Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Planet at War With Itself
Poor sanitation, water shortages, climate change and environmental destruction – Afghanistan grimly illustrates the fate of many nations if we do not act now
Sala Khan Khel, 40 miles outside Kabul, looks like a rural paradise at harvest time. Women and children play behind the high mud walls of the old houses, the men thresh the wheat, teenagers pick walnuts and the water coming straight off the snowy mountains high above the village gurgles through the irrigation canals.
A shortage of clean water and no proper sanitation are two of the most severe problems affecting refugees living in the Parwan-e-duo slum, Kabul, Afghanistan. (Photograph: Jason P. Howe/Oxfam) But the rural idyll hides conflict, deep poverty and growing environmental degradation. Most families here say they have been uprooted by war in the last 20 years, and that climate change means the seasons have become shorter. Also, the population has grown so much there's not enough land to grow food for everyone. On top of that, they say, the water is polluted and is now a source of conflict.
"We can't earn nearly enough. Compared to 20 years ago we are now much poorer. We have new crop diseases we cannot treat, there's conflict between the herders and the settled farmers, and people are cutting down the forests for fuel," says Mahmoud Saikal, a village elder.
Sala Khan Khel's problems mirror those seen all over Afghanistan and the prospects of this war-torn, hungry country getting anywhere near meeting millennium development goal 7 – which covers water, sanitation and the environment – is zero in the next decade and probably for far longer.
Afghanistan is not just one of the poorest countries in the world, it has some of the very worst human development indicators, comparable to Sierra Leone and Angola. Its development has been tied closely to conflict for decades and it only signed the Millennium Declaration in 2004.
Since then, its situation has worsened. Millions of people have flooded into the capital Kabul, either to escape conflict or increasingly to find work or food. The city, with an estimated five million people, is believed to be the fastest-growing capital in the world and new, illegal shanty towns creep up and over the hillsides every year. More than 75% of the whole of the urban Afghan population live without water, electricity or secure ownership. In Kabul, the figure is almost certainly higher.
Government statistics, which are sparse and unreliable, are shocking: in rural areas, it is estimated that 80% of all Afghans are drinking contaminated water. A similar proportion of hospital patients in Kabul suffer from diseases caused by polluted air or water. The burgeoning city generates nearly 2,000 tonnes of solid waste a day but only has the capacity to handle 400 tonnes.
It is one of the only capital cities in the world without a sewage system and last year a survey found that it had only 35 public toilets. The authorities say only one in 10 or 20 households have access to clean water via the city water system, with everyone else sharing communal water pumps.
In rural areas, where people rely on timber for fuel, the forests are disappearing. This, says a spokesman for the environmental protection agency, "is an ecological disaster. With the loss of forests and vegetation, and excessive grazing, soils are being exposed to serious erosion from wind and rain. Land productivity is declining, driving people from rural to urban areas in search of food and employment."
Like many other developing countries, Afghanistan has strong environmental laws but no money to implement them. An EU review of MDG 7 statements from more than 60 countries earlier this year shows that monitoring and reporting, for the most part, have not been undertaken systematically.
The result is that the cycle of poverty, ill health and environmental destruction continues worldwide, say observers.
Although the world is ahead of schedule in meeting the MDG 2015 target on drinking water, in 2008 some 13% of the world's population, or 884m people, still depended on unimproved water, sharing it with animals from lakes, rivers and dams.
On sanitation the situation is desperate. "If current rates of progress go on, MDG 7 target will take more than 200 years to be achieved in sub-Saharan Africa and countries like Afghanistan. Globally, 4,000 children die from diarrhoea a day and in Africa it is now the biggest killer of children under five. Even if the MDG 7 sanitation target were achieved, more than 1.7 billion people would still be without sanitation," says a spokesman from campaign group WaterAid.
Progress on the environmental targets has been the slowest of all MDGs. Worldwide, forest deforestation and fish-stock depletion rates are higher now than they were in 2000. The target to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss has been missed by all 192 countries who have signed up. Climate change emissions in developing countries are soaring and rose overall nearly 30% between 1990 and 2005.
Bright spots include slums. In 1990, UN Habitat could report that 46% of urban populations in developing countries lived in slums, a fall of more than 10% thanks to rapid industrial growth in China and India. Equally, while millions of acres of forest continued to be lost in Latin America and south -east Asia, the rate of replanting worldwide increased dramatically in the last decade.
Worryingly, the pressure on biodiversity – the wealth of nature that is the base of all economies – is increasing. No country has reported progress since 1990, and the need to produce more food and materials for a rapidly increasing global population is threatening most developing countries' habitats.
Most indicators are negative. No government claims success. Some 17,000 plant and animal species are threatened now with extinction. The world's fisheries are not satisfactory – more than half are fully exploited and 28% are overexploited, says a UN report.
- Posted in

36 Comments so far
Show AllAnd why are so many Nations hurting so badly ?
War
Example Aghanistan
Early seventies considered Golden Years under Shah.
Series of coups brings socialists who are implementing gender and agrarian reform.
Afghanistan degrades when the USA arms fundalmentalists and landlords rebelling against the reformist, progressive, socialist government in order to draw the Soviets into their own "Vietnam".
Soviets withdraw and a decade of Civil War follows.
Taliban defeat all opposition and pacify Afghanistan, bringing stabilty and law and order (albeit flawed in some ways).
Poppy reduction 90% at USA and UN request.
Agentina and UNOCAL willing to invest in cross country pipeline.
Taliban firmly control 90% of the Nation.
Then the USA attacks and initiates another decade and counting of warfare.
The USA is responsible for 30 years of almost continuous warfare in Afghanistan.
Afghanistan does not exist in a vacumn, there are specific reasons for its problems and number one is USA geopolitical violence.
last week I read that the Number one war material manufacture was in trouble..That is of course
the good old usa the proponent of endless war.
Seems business was down..
Now this week we hear that the number one dictatorship in the world Sandia arabia
is to be sold Over 60 billion dollars worth of killing stuff.. Of course that will be paid for by you and me in the end..
I think that this is not a coincident!!!
Death is the business of the usa..
Bleed the beast stop buying stuff.
Before Louis XIV built Donald Trump's wet dream (the "Palace" at Versailles), he had tried to re-do Paris in a way that the elites could stop being exposed to the rabble and filth. He soon realized that he could not contain and control all of the people, so he switched to escaping from them and took his (their) money away.
We, in the United States of Global Domination, are part way through the same kind of process.
The end results (guillotines and back stabbing) are already in the air. The main difference is that the "palace" on the Potomac (and the Hudson and Lake Michigan) is economically and environmentally much more deceitful, deadly, and vain.
"L etat c'est moi." In a very sad way, truer words were never spoken.
Dear birdbrain alley:
Very true, and one other interesting thing about Louis and friends was that they had beautiful buildings, but no bathrooms. They used back hallways and the stairs to "do double duty" there!
Ironically, Afghanistan has 35 toilets for 5 million people. There aren't enough back stairways in all the European castles to handle that.
It was wonderful hearing from other posters , that witha simple glass bottles, people could sterilize the water; I just hope the water doesn't have oil in it, or any other combatant fuel.
Saddest of all, is that not only has the U.S ruined Afghanistan's environment, but our own too. Yes,there is a war with the planet, but it's not the peoples' war; it's the profiteers.
Real history free zone. That way the US can be blamed for everything form the Black Death to China's real estate bubble.
Now the US is responsible for the Soviet invasion? There are no other reassons for Afghans troubles but the US?
This is the kind of resasoning that leads people to disbelief. Our invasion...you bet, but the other stuff is hokem.
Bresynski (sp?) specifically said he wanted to give the Soviets their own "Vietnam".
The rebelling fundamentalists and landlords would most likely have been defeated by the socialist government pre Soviet invasion except for USA support, thus no 30 years of warfare and no Taliban.
But the USA did not want a Progressive Socialist Afghanistan
Just as it attempts to crush any other Progressive Socialist Nation.
I am sure the posters here could quickly list 20 such nations.
And 30 years of USA instigated warfare is not Afghanistans only problem but is the primary cause of it's devastation.
During Russia’s Afghan occupation we could have given the militants hospitals and schools instead of stinger missiles to make life miserable for our cold war arch enemy. But our motives as always were greedy, so our actions were greedy.
from the article:
~ Government statistics, which are sparse and unreliable, are shocking: in rural areas, it is estimated that 80% of all Afghans are drinking contaminated water. ~
here is one study confirming what I'd heard elsewhere:
simply placing contaminated water in small, clear containers (a few mason jars, or the like), and setting it in the sun for a matter of a handful of hours, kills virtually all of the harmful bacteria...
please note this particular study was done in 1979, 30 years ago, and yet I know of no current school of thought that discusses this free method of sanitizing water...this article doesn't...
http://almashriq.hiof.no/lebanon/600/610/614/solar-water/unesco/35-46.html
understanding this may not answer every possible water-borne hazard, isn't it weird not to regularly take advantage of such free, solar assistance to health?
And Afghanistan's sun is so strong it can literally draw the blood through your skin.
Nice, Dubet. I seem to remember this study, but had forgotten it. Easy to test it, though. Getting clear containers that are clean is another problem, but certainly one easy to solve.
I just Googled 'solar water treatment'. Sure enough, the system has been around for thirty years. Take plastic water bottles [see following note] and fill them with your normal polluted water. Lay them on a piece of black plastic [or black anything] in direct sunlight for 5 hours. The sunlight will kill virtually all organisms. The water needs to reach 150 degrees for one hour minimum [pasteurization]. Temperature can be tested with a tube of congealed meat fat, which will melt at 156 degrees. Note from above: plastic water bottles contain a chemical known to produce birth defects in fetuses. However, if the child lives long enough to produce a kid, that is, I suppose, an advantage. Once the kids stay alive, then maybe we could talk about birth control ... Glass bottles would be much better, but the plastic ones are everywhere, polluting our world. Incidentally, this system will not kill chemical pollution, only biological agents.
At the rising of the sun and at its evening departure
May we feel remorse for the sins of man.
At the blowing of the cold wind that brings the beauty of winter
May we feel remorse for man’s inhumanity to his fellow man.
At the birth of Spring and a new wondrous life cycle
May we feel remorse for the horrors of our devastating destruction.
At the end of a long warm day of summer
May we feel remorse for our long, continuing-failure to realize goodness.
At the rustling of the leaves and with the beauty of fall
May we feel remorse for the deaths and pain of the innocents.
As long as we live
May we feel remorse for what we have failed to do and become.
Remorse don't help unless you change your behavior, stop the destruction, try to feed life.
This is another case of hierarchal/power elite mentality laying ruin to all in its path.
AD
The "hierarchal/power elite," they are the upper half of society, the 51% most aggressive and wealth, all those with great jobs, terrific homes and deluxe healthcare.
No envy here as I have no desire to be aggressive, wealthy, have a so-called "great job", one of their "terrific homes" (barf) and NO WAY do I want "deluxe healthcare." They can have it all.
The title of this article in incorrect. The planet is not at war with itself. The rich people are at war with the rest of the population. All of these problems are ones of GREED. Some people want it all, and they damn near have it all. In the United States the top 1% of the top 1% own nearly everything in our nation. It is these same excessively wealthy people who are the cause of all the problems listed in this article.
The earth is here for all of us to SHARE. No one should be allowed to grab it all and cause such pain and suffering on the people and our dear Earth. The rich are killing us and our mother the earth.
I wish a biblical plague on them. May they perish from the earth.
But then we would never reach the ultimate conclusion of misery, and always would there be some liar creating darkness by a pretense of good, to hide his intent to be enriched upon our misery.
wantrealdemocracy You are absolutely right about GREED being the cause of the suffering and devastation we see in the world. The terrible trend of our government's focus on controlling the world with military force and threats
will continue until sane citizens unite in demanding sanity and a return to a true democracy. Most members of congress in both major political parties are tied to the greedy war profiteering industries and the nonproductive greed of Wall Street.
We need a strong third party of real progressives before the next presidential election! In the meantime we need to make our voices heard loud and clear.
speedyfrank
FINISH THE WAR IN HEAVEN -- WHAT EARTH IS ALL ABOUT
To have a freewill, the freedom to pursue happiness as we perceive it to be, we need to have a desire to never do evil, to never enrich ourselves upon the misery of another no matter how great the emotional ecstasy and pleasure may be.
A relatively simple thing to accomplish, just create us with a realization that life is more then we deserve, which will give us a grateful harmless mind that feels most guilty if ever it fails to give all it can give.
Problem is, this would make us a slave to good and destroy our freedom to do both good and evil. Also this would make it impossible for us to tell if God was the highest good or the highest form of evil. For a lie is a pretense of good hiding evil, and as God has the greatest knowledge of good, he could lock us in slavery and darkness forever with an unending pretense of good to hide his enrichment upon our misery. Which is exactly what the super smart rich are doing to us now.
So, God created two thirds of the angels with a grateful mind that always did good by giving all it could give. Also God created a Satan and a third of the angels with a mind locked in darkness with the illusion that it deserved more then life, which gave them an ingrate mind and a guilty conscience if ever they failed to take all they could take.
And so, there was war in heaven, whereupon Satan and the third of angels who loved to take all they could take, they were cast down to earth. Then humanity was created with the vast majority like the evil angels, with an ingrate mind and a guilty conscience if ever they failed to take all they could take.
So the purpose of this world is to establish a full and perfect understanding of darkness, so that never again may any liar enrich himself upon our misery in darkness.
never mind...
New Orleans, Detroit, Southern California, Alberta Canada, West Virginia mountains, Dimick Pennsylvania, and just about any forest still left in state and federal parks that hasn't already burned.
Afghanistan is an excellent laboratory for the entire world, for what happens as environmental limits are overrun, and what happens when military solutions are imposed. The diverse environmental systems problem facing the people have not been helped by this foreign occupation. The fact that it is not accepted by the majority means that there is no effective government. The end result as trends move to predetermined conclusions, has to be mass starvation and disease. As the self appointed ultimate source of authority here, the USA is responsible.
As the USA plans to stay indefinitely, it will be responsible for distributing food aid to the entire nation. At this point it will have won its war, for the entire population will be dependent on it for survival, on the continued supply of food. With the cost of oil, and rising world food prices, the cost of continuing occupation will exceed todays. Does the USA really want to continue fighting for the privilege of having another long term debt and burden? What is the point of an Empire, if the client states cannot be positive self supporting assets?
"September 14, 2010 by The Guardian/UK
A Planet at War With Itself"
A planet that consisted of One Country.. UNDER LAW... sounds as though it might have some appeal - how could it be worse than what we have now?
I can't help but consider this aim, this goal, that has been on the cards for generations.. decades. We can look at Freemasonry, The Illuminata, 'Theosophy' and other such kinds of 'organisations' toward which I believe most of us find or would find if they knew of them : weird, occult, 'bad', objectionable.. we can examine the back of the American one dollar note via google.. and understand things we didn't understand before.
BUT, what alternative is there - we are destroying the planet. What other solution is there but to allow no single nation to have arms with which to murder each other and people of other nations? And, poison the planet. For ALL of us.
Most thinking people, and so many of them come in here, might see the rational.. And note that there are too many people (irrational, I think, to say there are not and that we should continue to pollute Earth's water, air and soil to feed an evergrowing world population until we can't drink the water, breathe the air and grow crops to feed ourself.)
Any other suggestions, not as to what has happened, is happening but 'should, rationally' happen?
~sc
I don't think we should consider 'America' as if the 'World Government' would consist ONLY of Americans!!...
That is not the idea... most likely there would be Americans included in that government - The Government would be better composed of the most brilliant and good (and non-religious) people of the world. I say, 'non-religious' - other than those who are religious in their believing in the existence of their own idea of 'god' 'as in a closet'. Religion as the atheist, agnostic and sensible religious person will surely admit.. Religion strife would be one HUGE less issue to worry about.
Einstein said (as I keep repeating, from his book 'Decoding the Universe') : 'The only salvation for civilization.. lies in the creation of world government with security of nations founded upon LAW' (my caps)(including his, no countries having arms etc)
~sc
"But the rural idyll hides conflict, deep poverty and growing environmental degradation."
There is something very troubling about this article that reduces to the level of off-hand remarks the nine+ years of devastation brought about by the US invasion and attempted occupation of Afghanistan. I think that the war ought to be moved a bit more front and center in any analysis of current Afghanistan.
The long history of wars and colonialism ought also to be mentioned. This is an ahistorical report and as such is close to meaningless. One can only wonder at the purpose of such a distorted article.
john ellis
"Problem is, this would make us a slave to good and destroy our freedom to do both good and evil"
Ah, The Christian : 'The Argument from Evil'.. Which goes like this :
God can not do the logically impossible.
God can not make 2 + 2 = anything other than 4 (GIVEN THE MEANING OF THE WORDS).
That would be a logical impossibility and God can not do the logically impossible.
God can not make a triangle be at the same time a square. That is a logical impossibility and God can't do the logically impossible.
God can not have made Man be all good AND have free will. That is a logical impossibility and God can't do the logically impossible.
CONSIDER : God is all good and God has free will... so guess what God is !
~sc
raine
“God cannot make man to be all good, and still have a freewill.
That is a logical impossibility and God can't do the logically impossible.”
LIGHT
We have a freewill to do anything but commit suicide, otherwise we suffer eternal non existence.
To willingly jump off a cliff is suicide. Likewise, to enrich yourself upon the misery of another is suicide for the human race, as evidenced by man’s ingrate greed and the environment scheduled to self-destruct by greed.
Now what would happen if there were such a God as above poster describes, one that could make man be good? And what if he would give everyone a conviction that this day of life is more then they deserve? Would not everyone have a grateful harmless mind that felt guilty if ever it failed to give all it could give?
So, the purpose of this ingrate world is to reach the ultimate conclusion of evil, so that all can experience the misery of evil.
For we all live a doomed existence, even the rich, and nothing can be more miserable then death.
Raine
“The only salvation for civilization… a one-world
government… free or religion…founded upon LAW”
LIGHT
Since the beginning of civilization, all the governments of men have been ruled by the 51% most aggressive and wealthy. The great American Civil War for example, the North won only because it came up with the largest army.
Take our very religious government for example, with a most fake morality that decrees, “All men are created equal and endowed by their Creator…” The result being the most unequal society the world has ever known, as it has the greatest disparity of wealth.
For true morality is to grasp the reality that this day of life is more then you deserve, as it gives you a guilty conscience if ever you fail to give all you can give.
I just want to tell you that I appreciate that you hammer this home:
~ For true morality is to grasp the reality that this day of life is more then you deserve, as it gives you a guilty conscience if ever you fail to give all you can give. ~
While I was already familiar with this 'place', and continually try to do this very thing, it is very helpful, and reassuring, to have someone else state it so clearly and consistently...
one cannot be perfect, but one can forgive oneself for error, and continue to try to improve...'maintenance' being an illusion, as what really is meant is the constant effort and focus required to 'gain', balanced against the ongoing regulation, and acceptance, of inevitable loss...
gravity, like rust, never sleeps...
peace, john ellis
"LIGHT
We have a freewill to do anything but commit suicide, otherwise we suffer eternal non existence"
>>>>>
Of COURSE we have the free will to commit suicide! Jesus comitted suicide. He 'knew' (he even told his apostles) that one of them was going to 'sell him to the soldiers' -
give his whereabouts away.
What did he do? He stayed - which was not just tantamout to committing suicide.. but was, in fact, committing suicide.
Socrates could have fled - he refused to do so. He preferred (of his own free will) to commit suicide rather than either move to another district or, stop talking.
~sc
John and Dubet :
"So, the purpose of this ingrate world is to reach the ultimate conclusion of evil, so that all can experience the misery of evil.
For we all live a doomed existence, even the rich, and nothing can be more miserable then death."
*Shudder*!! However :
Richard Dawkins :
(do look at his biog. without condemning him as some 'ape' who is uneducated evil et al!)
"“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”
If you don't agree with the above description, maybe there is another description, more correct, in some other book than the bible?
I don't like the sound of the biblical one. !
~sc