Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Scientists Say Gulf Oil Disaster Altering Food Web
New Orleans - Scientists are reporting early signs that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is altering the marine food web by killing or tainting some creatures and spurring the growth of others more suited to a fouled environment.
This June 17, 2010 photo provided by the University of California Santa Barbara shows a dead pyrosome floating in an oil slick near the site of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico. (AP Photo/University of California Santa Barbara Department of Earth Science, David L. Valentine) Near the spill site, researchers have documented a massive die-off of pyrosomes - cucumber-shaped, gelatinous organisms fed on by endangered sea turtles.
Along the coast, droplets of oil are being found inside the shells of young crabs that are a mainstay in the diet of fish, turtles and shorebirds.
And at the base of the food web, tiny organisms that consume oil and gas are proliferating.
If such impacts continue, the scientists warn of a grim reshuffling of sealife that could over time cascade through the ecosystem and imperil the region's multibillion-dollar fishing industry.
Federal wildlife officials say the impacts are not irreversible, and no tainted seafood has yet been found. But Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., who chairs a House committee investigating the spill, warned Tuesday that the problem is just unfolding and toxic oil could be entering seafood stocks as predators eat contaminated marine life.
"You change the base of the food web, it's going to ripple through the entire food web," said marine scientist Rob Condon, who found oil-loving bacteria off the Alabama coastline, more than 90 miles from BP's collapsed Deepwater Horizon drill rig. "Ultimately it's going to impact fishing and introduce a lot of contaminants into the food web."
The food web is the fundamental fabric of life in the Gulf. Once referred to as the food chain, the updated term reflects the cyclical nature of a process in which even the largest predator becomes a food source as it dies and decomposes.
What has emerged from research done to date are snapshots of disruption across a swath of the northern Gulf of Mexico. It stretches from the 5,000-feet deep waters at the spill site to the continental shelf off Alabama and the shallow coastal marshes of Louisiana.
Much of the spill - estimated at up to 182 million gallons of oil and around 12 billion cubic feet of natural gas - was broken into small droplets by chemical dispersants at the site of the leaking well head. That reduced the direct impact to the shoreline and kept much of the oil and natural gas suspended in the water.
But immature crabs born offshore are suspected to be bringing that oil - tucked into their shells - into coastal estuaries from Pensacola, Fla., to Galveston, Texas. Oil being carried by small organisms for long distances means the spill's effects could be wider than previously suspected, said Tulane professor Caz Taylor.
Chemical oceanographer John Kessler from Texas A&M University and geochemist David Valentine from the University of California-Santa Barbara recently spent about two weeks sampling the waters in a six-mile radius around the BP-operated Deepwater Horizon rig. More than 3,000 feet below the surface, they found natural gas levels have reached about 100,000 times normal, Kessler said.
Already those concentrations are pushing down oxygen levels as the gas gets broken down by bacteria, Kessler and Valentine said. When oxygen levels drop low enough, the breakdown of oil and gas grinds to a halt and most life can't be sustained.
The researchers also found dead pyrosomes covering the Gulf's surface in and around the spill site. "There were thousands of these guys dead on the surface, just a mass eradication of them," Kessler said.
Scientists said they believe the pyrosomes - six inches to a foot in length - have been killed by the toxins in the oil because there have no other explanation, though they plan further testing.
The researchers say the dead creatures probably are floating to the surface rather than sinking because they have absorbed gas bubbles as they filtered water for food.
The death of pyrosomes could set off a ripple effect. One species that could be directly affected by what is happening to the pyrosomes would be sea turtles, said Laurence Madin, a research director at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Cape Cod, Mass. Some larger fish, such as tuna, may also feed on pyrosomes.
"If the pyrosomes are dying because they've got hydrocarbons in their tissues and then they're getting eaten by turtles, it's going to get into the turtles," said Madin. It was uncertain whether that would kill or sicken the turtles.
The BP spill also is altering the food web by providing vast food for bacteria that consume oil and gas, allowing them to flourish.
At the same time, the surface slick is blocking sunlight needed to sustain plant-like phytoplankton, which under normal circumstances would be at the base of the food web.
Phytoplankton are food for small bait fish such as menhaden, and a decline in those fish could reduce tuna, red snapper and other populations important to the Gulf's fishing industries, said Condon, a researcher with Alabama's Dauphin Island Sea Lab.
Seafood safety tests on hundreds of fish, shrimp and other marine life that could make it into the food supply so far have turned up negative for dangerous oil contamination.
Assuming the BP gusher is stopped and the cleanup successful, government and fishing industry scientists said the Gulf still could rebound to a healthy condition.
Ron Luken, chief scientist for Omega Protein, a Houston-based company that harvests menhaden to extract fish oil, says most adult fish could avoid the spill by swimming to areas untainted by crude. Young fish and other small creatures already in those clean waters could later repopulate the impacted areas.
"I don't think anybody has documented wholesale changes," said Steve Murawski, chief scientist for the National Marine Fisheries Service. "If that actually occurs, that has a potentially great ramification for life at the higher end of the food web."



39 Comments so far
Show AllThis could be a disaster of Biblical proportions.
We may see mass evacuations from the Gulf coast because of the health hazard from the evaporating crude oil. It will be compounded by the lack of seafood which supports much of the economy in the Gulf.
Maybe people will finally realize that what are most important for human beings are clean air and clean water, not oil.
Good point bossyman. Maybe someday, when both are more scarce than they are now.
That FKN Tony Hayward, Mr. Doug Suttles, Lamar McKay and their crimminal cronies need to be slapped into cuffs and hauled off to Federal prison ASAP. They are murderers that are in charge of the crime scene...
The ongoing and ultimate cost of human life and suffering let alone the destruction of the ecology of the Gulf is unfathonable to our imaginations..These people must be punished!!!
If an ordinary American had caused this willfull destruction they would never see the light of day...I, for one am sick and fed up with this double standard "Justice" system...
Hang these BASTARDS and hang them high!!!
Good golly, what a gift for GM Foods purveyors!
Genetically modified marine life that thrive
on oil-infested waters are soon to become
a staple in the American food pyramid.
Can you say market growth opportunity?
You Betcha!
"Federal wildlife officials say the impacts are not irreversible, and no tainted seafood has yet been found."
I feel much better now, because I know the government would never lie to me.
The standard taste test for fish is based on TASTING it to determine if it is safe to eat. Given the scope of this blowout and the amount of chemical dispersants used “Taste” tests can’t possibly be reliable.
yes, let's try to look on the bright side, shall we?
after all...um...well...
huh
is it stopped yet?
The article first states that "Along the coast, droplets of oil are being found inside the shells of young crabs that are a mainstay in the diet of fish, turtles and shorebirds." and then says that "Federal wildlife officials say ... no tainted seafood has yet been found."
Don't they consider oil-filled crabs to be tainted seafood? Have they redefined "tainted" to mean "causing irreversible organ failure or death"?
I think they mean no tainted caught-seafood in the markets.
That would not likely be truer, though, would it?
Aren't we glad we were told this, I could have never
figured this out for myself.
No shit! How's 'bout we take some of those "oil consuming microbes" and inject them into Hayward and the rest of the BP pricks?
"Scientists are reporting early signs that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is altering the marine food?"
I'm glad the scientists clarified this.
So, who’ll be the arbiter of truth to determine whether the seafood, which the people all along the Gulf Coast are consuming, is safe? Or will they add caveats to the menus "Eat at your own risk? Or, our food is "corexit free."
This is just so dam sad!
Words cannot begin to describe the horror the innocent people of the Gulf Coast and the sea and wildlife are now enduring.
To BP and their cohorts, go to F'n hell!
ohhhhh -
the fishbone's connected to the....
...to the oil bone...
...and the oil bone's connected to the Dead Zone...
This is turning into the worst disaster movie that Hollywood NEVER imagined, but it's real life.
I read that artists in England are now picketing British art museums that accept money from BP. It is good to know that many of the British are not swayed by BP's propaganda. Lest you dis the artists, remember how much of history and popular culture were ignited into action through art.
I also read that the EU wants to suspend ALL deep water drilling, but it is sad that the effects on BUSINESS seem so paramount and news worthy. If the ocean dies, who cares about business? It would seem that the creatures from H.P. Lovecraft, will be coming for us all.
How does personal responsibility fit into the equation?
It's our nature to point the finger elsewhere -> government, BP, oil industry, but try personal accountability.
I'm ashamed about decisions that I've made in the past in light of recent events. I still have an environmental "footprint" that I'm trying to downsize.
I haven't done any recreational driving for over ten years and would be pleased as hell if KEI vehicles were street legal without restriction. But Detroit lobbyists have had their say in state legislatures around the country and the federal government isn't moving on this issue that could have immediate effect.
"Immediate" you say? I'd dump the vehicle I have tomorrow for one that is affordable and gets 40 MPG.
Don't buy the rational that KEI vehicles are not safe for the US either. Is a motorcycle "safe" in a "contest" with a car, or a car with a semi? KEIs can go 55 mph. How fast does one have to go in commuter traffic? There are plenty of vehicles that are street legal that are similar to KEI vehicles, so why not KEI here; why not KEI now?
Terran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kei_car
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/07/14-5
We could always use more fuel efficient cars like are avaialble in Europe or east Asia. But better that people seek a lifestyle where they don't need a car for routine transportation. It's not as difficult as you think - simply don't live or take jobs in suburbia and choose to only live in areas that are walkable and served by public transit.
Hey Terran, Right on. Check out our site at driveeasy.org. Reduce consumption and attack their bottom line. They need $65/barrel to drill in deep water. Remember supply and demand and the effect on price. Wean the world.
All of BP's money & assets should be placed under the very strict supervision of some very trustworthy trustees who are not sympathetic to any corporation or oligarchy. They should enable BP to operate and work at cleaning up, but they should be very careful not to let them escape justice.
That the BP executives are more worried about profits than the damage they're doing to our planet and how they can best make it right, is criminal.
If any individual or group of individuals no matter how rich, causes a catastrophe on a grand scale, it is a no-brainer to expect them to walk away in financial ruin. It's a terribly unfortunate mistake, and we should have a little bit of sympathy for them, but they should not be exempted from justice.
The greatest story ever told and retold and retold: British Petroleum's seemingly endless futile attempts to plug their Gulf of Mexico deep water oil gusher.
In future, no more off-shore drilling in water deeper than Sarah Palin's knees... We'll give her a snorkel and let her stop any lil ole oil leaks herself...
Those pyrosomes are icky creatures. But, thanks to this article, which precipitated some googling, I now have finally identified this 5 ft gleatenous chain of primitive contracting organisms I saw when scuba diving in Bonaire (Netherlands Antilles - just off Venezuela) back in 1982 during my own oil patch days as a mudlogger in Venezuela. The critter was a chain of salps - a primitive organism that is considered the starting point in the evolution of all vertibrates.
And, learning this only took 28 years.
I'll never forget how when I asked the dive guide, a local Bonarian, he said he thought it might be a cluster of eggs from the Bottlenose dophins we had sen earlier. I could bear to tell him that dolphins (the mammal not the fish) don't lay eggs!
now we wait for news on what the controlled burns will be contributing to the food chain, uh, web.
i'm with stubonese49 on this one. make it a public execution.
Agreed. If I were to drain my engine oil out on the mesa and a cop drove by, I would surely get a ticket, maybe even go to jail.
This "was" one of my family favorite road trip vacation spots:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pcolagregg#p/a/u/0/HNnya9YBoGk
someone emailed me this. it just seems so pertinent.
GOD:
St Francis, you know all about gardens and nature. What in the world
is going on down there on the planet? What happened to the dandelions,
violets, milkweeds and stuff I started eons ago? I had a perfect
no-maintenance garden plan. Those plants grow in any type of soil,
withstand drought and multiply with abandon. The nectar from the
long-lasting blossoms attracts butterflies, honey bees and flocks of
songbirds. I expected to see a vast garden of colors by now. But,
all I see are these green rectangles.
St FRANCIS:
It's the tribes that settled there, Lord. The Suburbanites. They
started calling your flowers 'weeds' and went to great lengths to kill
them and replace them with grass.
GOD:
Grass? But, while it has its uses, it's not colorful, it doesn't attract
butterflies, birds and bees; only grubs and sod worms. It's sensitive
to temperatures. Do these Suburbanites really want all that grass
growing there?
ST FRANCIS:
Apparently so, Lord. They go to great pains to grow it and keep it
green. They begin each spring by fertilizing grass and poisoning any
other plant that crops up in the lawn.
GOD:
The spring rains and warm weather probably make grass grow really
fast. That must make the Suburbanites happy.
ST FRANCIS:
Apparently not, Lord. As soon as it grows a little, they cut it-
sometimes twice a week.
GOD:
They cut it? Do they then bale it like hay?
ST. FRANCIS:
Not exactly, Lord. Most of them rake it up and put it in bags.
GOD:
They bag it? Why? Is it a cash crop? Do they sell it?
ST FRANCIS:
No, Sir, just the opposite. They pay to throw it away.
GOD:
Now, let me get this straight. They fertilize grass so it will grow.
And, when it does grow, they cut it off and pay to throw it away?
ST FRANCIS:
Yes, Sir.
GOD:
These Suburbanites must be relieved in the summer then, when we
cut back on the rain and turn up the heat. That surely slows the
growth and saves them a lot of work.
ST. FRANCIS:
You aren't going to believe this, Lord. When the grass stops growing
so fast, they drag out hoses and pay more money to water it, so
they can continue to mow it and pay to get rid of it.
GOD:
What nonsense. At least they kept some of the trees. That was a
sheer stroke of genius, if I do say so myself. The trees grow leaves
in the spring to provide beauty and shade in the summer. In the
autumn, they fall to the ground and form a natural blanket
to keep moisture in the soil and protect the trees and bushes.
It's a natural cycle of life.
ST. FRANCIS:
You better sit down, Lord. The Suburbanites have drawn up a new
cycle. As soon as the leaves fall, they rake them into great
piles and pay to have them hauled away.
GOD:
No!? What do they do to protect the shrub and tree roots in
the winter to keep the soil moist and loose?
ST FRANCIS:
After throwing away the leaves, they go out and buy something
which they call mulch. They haul it home and spread it around in
place of the leaves.
GOD:
And where do they get this mulch?
ST FRANCIS:
They cut down trees and grind them up to make the mulch.
GOD:
Enough! I don't want to think about this anymore. St.
Catherine, you're in charge of the arts. What movie have you
scheduled for us tonight?
ST. CATHERINE:
'Dumb and Dumber', Lord. It's a story about....
GOD:
Never mind, I think I just heard the whole story from St. Francis.
Too funny. Thanks for that. I needed that now more than ever.
well done
As go the oceans, so goes the world.
Last one out, please turn off the lights...
Non Serviam - I will not serve.
Peak Oil... Counter Currents .org.
I can't say that this will solve the climate change problem ... But, if you go to the website, you will see that this is another issue which will add to the future of our world to not be socool.
Check out "Crash Course" on Youtube for a great presentation on how the situation with Energy, the Economy and the Environment are likely to affect the near-term future.
HEY PEOPLE, LET'S GET RIGHT DOWN TO IT.tHE BUCK STOPS WITH US...WE'RE THE CONSUMER. iF WE DON'T LIKE WHAT'S HAPPENING THEN REDUCE CONSUMPTION OF THEIR PRODUCT...OIL. How to...If you must drive, then drive easy, if not park it and walk, bus carpool, bike or just stay home and read a book. Reduce consumption will hit their bottom line. Thw world must wean itself from oil. Don't wait for leadership from the government...look to yourself and the grassroot's. We're talking behavior change...voluntary. Wean baby wean. Check out our site for all the physics on speed and efficiency. Remember to just Drive Easy...Conserve
Why are you telling people to go to that counter currents website ? I t has nothing to do with what we are talking about. It is a sales place for tacky trinkets, and novelty shit ! Also it screwed with my computer...... I would not advise others to go there !
I am glad to see everyone argees on this subject ! It is wonderful to hear.
From the AP article:
"Much of the spill - estimated at up to 182 million gallons of oil and around 12 billion cubic feet of natural gas - was broken into small droplets by chemical dispersants at the site of the leaking well head. That reduced the direct impact to the shoreline and kept much of the oil and natural gas suspended in the water.
"But immature crabs born offshore are suspected to be bringing that oil - tucked into their shells - into coastal estuaries from Pensacola, Fla., to Galveston, Texas. Oil being carried by small organisms for long distances means the spill's effects could be wider than previously suspected, said Tulane professor Caz Taylor."
Didn't I read a few weeks ago---or now months!---that the federal government warned that use of such dispersants at such a large scale could have unforeseen consequences and should be discouraged?
And didn't I also read that there exist fines and penalties for polluting by oil, based on the SIZE of the "spill" while the use of such chemical dispersants makes it much harder to determine the real size of the "spill," thus potentially mitigating the fines and penalties?
The introduction of these innately toxic dispersants complicates not only the environmental/biological outcome, but probably adds another decade to pending litigation!
There is an old adage an old doctor used to repeat to me decades ago: "The solution to pollution is dilution." We both knew this was a lie, because it is possible only in a non-finite world (the concomitant here is that, for example, if atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons spreads radiation around the world, you've lost your "baseline" for "background radiation" How many of you can obtain your medical records from age 21?). Our world is ultimately finite. As we pollute it, so shall it pollute us back. The deeper we go into molecular chemistry the more we are surprised by our ignorance.
The failure of the EPA and/or other relevant federal agency to force a halt to the use of these dispersants is a crime in itself. It may even be a conspiracy.
Wake up, people! Naomi Klein's "Disaster Capitalism" barely touches this consequence of pure fascism.
Meanwhile, we have no evidence to date that "they" can stop this possibly abiotic oil gusher. A mile below the sea water, they punctured the planet's crust and then went down another three MILES or so, with a reaction at 9,000 psi???!!! My tires are inflated to 32 psi.
One more point that just hit me...
How do the chemical dispersants impact evaporation of Gulf Water into the atmosphere? What strange new chemicals will come with the next rain? It would not surprise me these days if we in SE Indiana get a rain storm dropping dead pyrosomes out of the sky. Will my dog want to eat them? Will I need to eat my dog?!
-30-
I agree with you. This article appears to me to be a propaganda piece. Dispersants are a deadly cosmetic. Shame on Common Dreams for propagating such junk.
Nanoo
Don't like their new term. It will stay food chain with me, as it is basic, simple, to the point and easily understood.