Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
California Senate Passes Medicare for All Legislation
New Energy for Healthcare Reform After National Bills Stall
SACRAMENTO - To ecstatic applause from healthcare advocates, the California Senate today breathed new life into national prospects for fundamental health reform by passing on a 22 to 14 vote a major bill to guarantee healthcare in the state through creating a Medicare for all system that would cover every Californian.
SB 810, The California Universal Healthcare Act, authored by Sen.
Mark Leno and sponsored by the California Nurses Association/National
Nurses United (CNA/NNU), with broad support among many healthcare,
community, and labor groups, will now proceed to a vote by the
Assembly, which has passed similar legislation in the past. The bill
would establish a single-payer system in California, modeled on the
healthcare systems flourishing in virtually all other industrialized
nations, where better patient outcomes are achieved at a fraction of
the cost of the U.S. system.
“It is unclear what the prospects are for health reform at the national level,” said CNA co-president Geri Jenkins, RN, “but this vote offers California the chance to chart a new course for the nation. SB 810 will guarantee healthcare for every family through a humane system that controls costs and allows patients and their doctors--not insurance agents--to make decisions about healthcare,” said Jenkins. “People will pay less, and no longer be denied care based on their income, age, location, or pre-existing health conditions.”
Noting during the floor debate that, “consistently 59 per cent of California voters say yes” they want a Medicare for all system in the state, Sen. Leno added that single-payer is not just a bill for a humane health system, but also a jobs program for a state that desperately needs one: “We can’t compete in a global marketplace where all our competitors have had the government take the burden of healthcare off the shoulders of their employers….as we move towards single-payer in this state, and have better universal coverage, this will attract employers to California. We are already underwater in our healthcare system. We can’t keep up.”
Referring to opposition arguments about supposed ballooning costs under the bill, Sen. Leno pointed out that a single payer system would simply redirect current spending on healthcare, away from insurance overhead and towards a more direct and efficient way of providing care. Additionally the bill would not go into effect immediately; the current SB 810 creates a system to propose revenue streams that would then go back to the legislature for final review.
Medicare for all or “single-payer” healthcare reforms, such as SB 810, would help create the kind of quality jobs so urgently needed today, and do so while providing a huge economic stimulus. A CNA/NNU study last year documented that national single-payer reform would generate 2.6 million jobs and $317 billion in additional business and public revenues. Further, CNA/NNU research last year found that six of California’s largest insurance companies reject more than one-fifth of all claims, an experience many California patients know all too well.
California is one of more than half a dozen states with similar state legislation this year, indicative of the desire for healthcare solutions by states no matter what happens at the federal level. Among major supporters of SB 810 are the California School Employees Association, California Physician Alliance, OneCare, and the Los Angeles Unified School District.
- Posted in



57 Comments so far
Show AllThis is a GREAT DAY for CALIFORNIA!!!
Next step is the governor's desk...where Arnold will be able to AGAIN CHOOSE to leave something of VALUE from his time in office...hmmm...
Might add that it's about time that our Congressional Representatives AND Senators notice that Californians WANT SINGLE PAYER. It's in the CA Democratic Party's PLATFORM, but them seem oblivious to the base and grassroots of their party.
Arnold already vetoed a previous attempt to do this (along with several other vetoes of progressive causes since 2003). Lets hope he doesn't veto it again.
This is a very very important development for those who support a single payer system.
This will be the new 800 pound gorilla that no one will be able to ignore.
The Devil is in the details. Specifically:
"...will now proceed to a vote by the Assembly, which has passed similar legislation in the past."
and
"Additionally the bill would not go into effect immediately; the current SB 810 creates a system to propose revenue streams that would then go back to the legislature for final review."
So this raises the following questions in my mind:
Supposing that the assembly votes in favor of the measure and "The Governator" signs the bill,What are the prospects of the funding legislation being passed?
Does such legislation require the famous "super majority" other tax measures require?
Nevertheless if nothing else, failure to support the funding of such legislation (if passed and enacted by governor's signature) could be an effective club to beat opponents come next election. California is still a trend setter for the rest of the nation and for that reason also this is a very positive and important development.
Poet
There's an Initiative on the ballot in California this year to get rid of that 2/3rds majority for revenue bills and adopt a simple majority rule.
But yeah, let's not pack our bags for that California Line just yet.
Cool, at least they wanna experiment with it. More power to California.
Now the problem is how are they gonna pay for it with the multibillion dollar deficit the state is running. I guess the future will tell.
-Now the problem is how are they gonna pay for it with the multibillion dollar deficit the state is running
Single payer is half the cost of what Americans pay for medical bills now. So the obvious answer is demonstrated by the following example:
assume john smith pays 10 000 for private health insurance
john smith saves the 10 000 he currently pays for private insurance
john smith pays 5 000 for the cost of single payer in the form of taxes
john smith comes out ahead, both in terms of money and better medicine, and California gets a revenue neutral universal health system
California is free to "experiment" all they want but the rest of the world has been doing this for decades.
right... "how to pay for it"... is a BIG republican RED HERRING... (and it fits in many other debates)...
"how to pay for it"... has already been decided... "it" is already being "paid for"...
the difference between the two political parties... is... has always been... what "it" is...
so... single payer costs are simply being spent elsewhere... the first thing any economics text has is the simple "guns vs. butter" graph...
after the great depression... an entrenched elite... FDR... enacted a host of populist legislation... enacted by a democratic led congress... (i'll have to defer to thom hartmann here as he knows his history)... but... FDR had a congress of democrats who supported populist legislation...
since 1970-1980 - esp. since watergate... the republicans have been absolute masters of re-framing the messages...
so... EVERYTHING populist is "government control"... when in reality... what has happened is people's money is going to high paid corporate officers... a.k.a.... the "it" is now the same money being spent on military... and now finance and health insurance and pharmaceuticals...
the argument should NOT be HOW are we going to pay for it... the progrssive argument needs to be...
WHY are we spending it on THAT?
which in the corporatist pursuit of ever expanding growth and customer bases... is ultimately unsustainable and "costs more" for your average... "joe the plumber"...
the "tea party" "water cooler" debates... should be... do you (your family) sleep better at night knowing that your health insurance company is charging TWICE what is costs to provide your current health care?
or... why do you support a senator/representative/governor who wants to DOUBLE YOUR TAXES on healthcare... would you be interested in CUTTING YOUR HEALTHCARE costs in half...
did you know... the top 10 officers at all the major healthcare companies... made more last year... than you will your entire working life... doesn't that... make you feel... you know... sick...?
SQUIDD.....
that is a Brilliant way of exposing the "RED HERRING" argument by the privatizers and conservatives.
it's really so simple, as you put.
take AWAY from the WASTEFUL , Destructive "other" expenses - war machinery, private "insurance" vampire industry, which themselves are already existing on WELFARE by the tax cuts they get and the other public financing support they get..and other forms of hidden taxation of ordinary people to support these SAME "private" industries...simply put THEM OUT OF EXISTENCE altogether, declare them not just ILLEGAL , but Criminal and Immoral ...(make those in that industry find OTHER jobs just like everyone else they have put OUT of jobs with the IRRELEVANT, UNNECESSARY existence of "private insurance" industry)...
and use THAT SAME amount for Single Payer for ALL. simple economics that does not need any further muddying which is what these "private enterprise" folks like to do.
Money is, after all, only paper.
a PROFOUND TRUTH!
as recently as last year -- natives in a pacific island nation (i think it is New Guinea)....had been complaining.
they were saying :
"we are seeing too many helicopters come and build and build..and taking away our land...now they will want us to use MONEY...and destroy our life...we are happy the way things have been....we wish they would leave us alone".
allright, so it's half. about $3500/person. at 37 million Cali residents that would be about $129 billion/year. california total tax income in 2007 was about $170 billion (probably less now). let's say about 30% is current medicare/medicaid. $55 bilion/year.
So the state of California will have to come up with $80 billion to fund this program. Nevermind the budget shortfall they have right now.
Don't get me wrong. More power to them. I lived in the EU and Canada (not visited, mind you, actually lived there for abut 10 years in each place) so I experienced their healthcare too and it was no different that what i get here in the US.
What i'm trying to point out is that this will not be "free" healthcare. That's what most people don't understand. They think their taxes are gonna stay the same and they gonna have some extra cash taht they won't have to use for health insurance.
I believe that health insurance for profit or any aspect of health care for profit is immoral.
I would support single payer health care even if it cost more than private insurance for profit. I don't believe people should profit from the suffering of others.
If people knew each other-----would you cheat your best friend if there were no way he could find out? How about if he knew and you had to see him every Sunday Morning?
I have trouble with depression now. I may not be able to live if I become convinced that I and everyone else is alone.
The key to your post lies in "most people".
Unless it is handled completely stupidly, "most people" WILL NOT see a raise in their taxes. The current budget shortfall in California is not an effect of El Nino, it is a direct result of unsustainably low tax rates on large enterprises and wealthy individuals combined with loss of jobs for the working majority- with a nicely delusional exploding real estate market to help screw things up mixed in, of course.
This healthcare bill addresses the jobs issue:
Any company that headquarters in California will be free of the expense of private health insurance for its workers. That's a big incentive.
The "Lakoff" Initiative to rid California of the Anti-Democratic 2/3rds majority rule for revenue bills takes care of the taxes.
And the "Tax Cannabis" Initiative creates both an entirely new and unique revenue stream for the State while simultaneously freeing the State from moronic prohibition expenses, AND stimulates jobs both directly in the emergant cannabis retail and cannabis-product production sectors but also in removing a too prevalent situation of felony records hindering job prospects for Californians.
I'm not saying that this is a slam dunk, but I am saying that the Assembly is virtually a lock to pass, and if these VERY popular Initiatives also pass, the arguments to fully implement this plan should easily succeed.
-matti.
Thank you MATTI for explaining it so well: the "cost" matter and why things are "unaffordable".
brilliantly said!
"Unless it is handled completely stupidly, "most people" WILL NOT see a raise in their taxes" - not true. Tax rate in countries with free healthcare is about 40%.
Let's take Canada for example. A 40 year old single mother of one making $40,000 is paying both federal as well as provincial taxes. Not sure that is happening in the US. Right now 50% of people in the US don't pay any federal tax.
Again I am not against "free" healthcare. Just wanted to bring people back to reality.
SSI is a tax. Gasoline, ethanol, and many other commodities are taxed at the federal level, so those who purchase those items are paying federal tax. Please justify your numbers, with plausible references.
Taxation in Canada might approach an average of 40 per cent for single individuals if you include every federal, provincial and municipal tax including VAT, sales taxes, gas taxes, property taxes, etc. Here are some figures from the OECD that show only average income taxes as of 2005. (Obviously many people pay much higher rates and many people pay much lower rates, depending on economic circumstance.)
As you can see, taxation rates for single individuals fall into a narrow range. The only anomaly is the Income Tax Rate for US Families. It would be interesting to know what the US rate would be if you added health care costs to the tax rate. Obviously it would be the highest on this table for singles, and probably comparable to the rate for families in the other three countries.
Country / Single no children / Married 2 children
Canada / 31.6% / 21.5%
United Kingdom / 33.5% / 27.1%
Japan / 27.7% / 24.9%
United States / 29.1% / 11.9%
And don't forget the additional savings. Right now, you are paying car insurance, which contains a medical section. With single payer, that will no longer be necessary. Home owner's insurance? It also carries a medical clause. With single payer, that is unnecessary, too. Workman's comp? With single payer, it's covered, so it can be eliminated. How many other times are you being charged for medical coverage? They can ALL be eliminated if single payer were enacted. The savings just from single payer can be HUGE, we just haven't had anyone look into it and give us the REAL numbers.
of course NONE of these is "free health care"....
the point is, and it is a monumental difference:
that the SAME amount of money, say, the SAME one dollar....that goes to taxes that is then , under the current "privatized" system or patchwork of private/public system , LAUNDERED so that it passes TO the PRIVATE Insurance and "delivery" system which should NEVER have been in the business of TAKING PUBLIC MONEY -- the SAME "dollar" - that is paid out in regular taxes, AND the other "hidden" taxes that come up as PREMIUMS and ever-rising "private insurance and health care provider" costs.
that is the point. the insurance business is nothing more than a "MIDDLE MAN" that is IRRELEVANT and USELFESS and only sucks taxes and public money and resources and infrastructure for NO OTHER PURPOSE than to be the "manager" or "administrator" of the funds accumulated in taxes (through their corporate tax "incentives" and other benefits insurance companies UNJUSTIFIABLY get throught their lobbyists) ...
while at the same time literally CHARGING the public for "private insurance and delivery" as part of at least TWO TIERS of taking public money so they can do their business of profiteering.
they are like THIEVES who are PAID by the working person out of his monthly earnings ....that's number one, and THEN they STILL charge the person ANOTHER "fee" through the tax cuts for offered to private insurers and businesses attached to this "privatized delivery system"...which they otherwise call "service" and related FEES...but which are in reality - MONEY accumulated through taxes and laundered towards these private businesses and industries through "tax incentives and tax cuts".
in other words - they are charging the public and individuals at least TWICE for a "service" that is devoted to DENIAL of care and profiteering.
the basic question is -- WHY SHOULD THEY EVEN BE ALLOWED to exist?
the answer for the STUPID , inhumane, barbaric american system is:
"we are a capitalist country" ...
and THAT"s the problem.
it's not the problem of COST - it's the problem of WHERE the cost is going...and it should REMOVE the part that goes to PRIVATE profiteers. PERIOD!
if anything, the so-called "rising costs" is due TO privatized health care, NOT any "inefficiency" or "waste" - even if they certain exist in any system , in the public system. it is the business of a government that properly functions to ensure that public money IS spent properly.
one of the ways to spend it IMPROPERLY is to take public money in taxes and give them away as "incentive" to PRIVATE corporations whose purpose is to profit at the expense of the public ..by using the public's OWN money in taxes to get away with its scams of stealing that money to transfer it into a few private hands.
that's what the insurance business does...in addition to its "normal" function of charging private fees (premiums, out-of-pocket contributions, deductibles, service charges, etc.) .
and THAT , in economic terms relating to public money is WASTEFUL and THEFT. nothing else.
"rising costs" they say? it's BECAUSE of privatization that costs are rising.
how else have big industries like the car industries gone bankrupt if not because of the "rising costs" charged BY these premium-crazy private insurance companies?
how else is it that middle class or working families have gone bankrupt due to premiums they can't afford and a single illness after which the private insurers practice THEIR form of "rationing" after gouging out the "clients?"
how is it that medicaire and medicaid payments are being cut because the taxes in social security, medicaid, medicaire and other taxes, state and federal are "laundered" so they appear ELSEWHERE such as in tax cuts for corporations, insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, the WAR industry and other such scams so typical of american "economics?"
remove all THAT -- and the taxes americans pay are SUFFICIENT to pay for universal, single-payer, high quality, ALL IN , no one out provision - with PLENTY left over for america's much needed infrastructures and with MORE to spare to even promote an america that is benevolent and generous towards OTHER nations
according to its CLAIMS but which is actually UNTRUE.
and how is this the case? because the people's money, first of all, is EATEN UP by these PRIVATE PROFITEERS.... from the banks and their bailouts, to the corporations , to the "health care and delivery" private system of Vampiric exploiters who shouldn't even be allowed to exist!
these people and their industries are simply USELESS and UNNECESSARY - and their existence is unjustified unless they turned themselves into gardeners and laborers just like so many other people and actually EARN their keep honestly and properly!
in reality the only ones that have been having and enjoying a "FREE RIDE" on public money and collective funds through premiums is none other than the insurance and private delivery system ITSELF!
they are the real "cost" that can not be AFFORDED by the nation or any nations. they are a BURDEN who should be excised from public life entirely and the money and funds and infrastructure to SERVICE them and their profiteering is better devoted to other TRULY USEFUL and beneficial things for a CIVILIZED society.
"A CNA/NNU study last year documented that national single-payer reform would generate 2.6 million jobs and $317 billion in additional business and public revenues."
I do think a national single payer system would be the best stimulus congress could pass. Every business freed from the burden of health insurance. Every employee free to move around the country without an insurance tether. Every doctor and hospital freed from the paperwork. Businesses and workers would be more competitive without that cost.
If you added the benefits of getting rid of the waste in the insurance system with commonsense improvements like drug price negotiations, you might be able to deliver care to everyone for less that we're delivering it to just a few now.
There's your change. If we could get real reform in healthcare and elections, which I guess is moot now, we could have a country that starts to work for ordinary people again.
Seems the perfect answer to everyone's objections. Let California try it for a year or two and let it prove itself. Whats wrong with that?
Then try and reject Single Payer because it doesn't work!
NOT SO FAST
(1) California has always been more Republican and conservative then liberal, more in favor of excessive wealth then social democracy.
(2) Correct solution to their long standing budget disaster is proper taxes for the rich, but never has it happened.
(3) More migrant workers and illegal aliens in California then any other state.
(4) Very easy for a Republican law maker to vote for social programs if they know it will never become law.
(5) The author of article made no effort to explain the sudden reversal in California politics.
This developement is news to me. Perhaps someone from California could tell us the chances that this might be vetoed or otherwise halted?
The California legislature has passed a single payer bill twice and the Governator vetoed it both times. He'll probably stay true to form this time as well. But eventually we will have a new governor and then perhaps we can make progress.
Yep, i agree he will veto it once more, this time its because of the budget crises .
According to sources I have within California's Single Payer Movement, Jerry Brown has vowed to veto any Single Payer initiative as well stating, "There is no way to pay for it."
So, I would suggest that those in California who are supporting Single Payer get together with Jerry Brown BEFORE he is elected to show him the numbers and convince him that the legislation being proposed would actually be workable.
As to a funding source for the system I would propose a tax increase on all the "sin items". All alcohol and tobacco products, marijuana (if it is legalized), high caloric "snack items" and sugary soda drinks. Yes, the scorned "Snack Tax" Brad Sherman so loves to put down. Perhaps a modest tax increase on energy/water (through each districts DWP). And finally a gasoline tax. Just enough to help fund the program. After all, folks won't be forced to fork out their money anymore to Blue Cross/Blue Shield. So it's obvious that a "new" form of tax will have to be implemented in order to fund the program. Especially with California's budget in such dire straits at this time.
Also, in order to secure the necessary number of votes in the House and Senate to OVERRIDE A VETO/pass a budget increase, I suggest that a study of every Assembly and Senate district be done to ascertain which seats need to be challenged in future elections so that individuals within the Single Payer movement in those select districts can be DRAFTED to run against those individuals who consistently vote against the Single Payer bill.
The power is in electoral politics. We need to become highly sophisticated with our efforts/energies and money in the future in order to secure the type of living arrangements we desire.
Abbybwood, R.N.
Jerry Brown is a Corp Dim Hack. Governor Moon Beam hasn't been for anybody but himself for 30 years. He spent several years orchestrating his 'come back' with a Pacifica Radio program called "We the People". He told all the 'lefties' and 'progressives' everything they wanted to hear. Then he ran for and won office and went hard right to his corp buddies. Jerry is there to sell us out like all the rest of the Dim Hacks.
Alcohol and tobacco are already heavily taxed, and probably more than enough to offset the social costs. Many other drugs are not, including those under various levels of control. Polluters are rarely charged sufficiently, however, and in CA, while gasoline and (I presume) diesel are taxed, all that revenue is used for roads, etc., and none for health care offsets.
The money is there. By relieving employers of the burden to pay, they can afford to pay (somewhat less) in taxes, a net gain for those who have paid for employee healthcare. Others, who provide minimum benefits now, would lose, but what is the harm in a level playing field?
Lowering business costs in exchange for a lower contribution to a state healthcare system, and taxing (or fining) activities which harm health, universal single-system health care in CA could very well reduce the state budget problem.
A veto is likely but not certain, since it would seal the Governator's doom at election time.
(1) California has always been more Republican and conservative then liberal, more in favor of excessive wealth then social democracy.
This is going to be real news to my relatives in California. Of all the states of the union, California would be the very last to be described as conservative. Or Republican for that matter.
Bravo California Nurses Union and the California Senate!
The absurd "reform" bill currently stalled in the US Senate should now be allowed to die, and state by state single payer can be introduced as their citizens recognize the advantages.
A few problems might arise, apart from funding. What happens when unemployed folks with medical problems start moving to California because they can't get or afford insurance in their home states?
-What happens when unemployed folks with medical problems start moving to California because they can't get or afford insurance in their home states?
Yes and what happens if someone in California wants to take a job in New York? Can they afford to give up their healthcare?
This is why the politicians you elected at the national level should start doing their job.
The Feds bailed out banks and they are going to let a state go under? I don't think so.
Should they be so stupid will John Q. Public sleep right through it? Naaaa never could happen. Of course they let New Orleans go under, but a lot of rich people live in California. Should all those filthy rich actors, producers, directors, AND filthy rich loafers who just like the docks on California----never could happen.
There are predictions that The US will be broken up into smaller provinces, each under the control of a European power. It can't happen to soon for me. This country has a reputation of which the whole world is ashamed.
The day will come when people will lie to avoid being suspected of being a citizen of the now proud and powerful USA. They will plead: "It has always been my home. I didn't choose to be born here." Try to think about you feel about your own country. Your own Home."
Way to go!
Once again, California leads the way. Though they may have a temporary immigration problem from other states, it has to be done to showcase the solution.
Big Insurance will be pouring millions into campaigns to cause it to fail. But if California can clean up their voter initiative and referendum system by removing the super-majority rule and limiting Big Money cons from buying propaganda ads, Single Payer there will have a good chance of success by the referendum system.
EXCELLENT news!!
I will be following this closely!
Sioux Rose
A heartfelt bravo and applause goes out to Donna Smith who never gave up and kept up the fight! May she, and her family, know the direct fruit of those labors. And I hope the intelligent, humane decision being spearheaded by California will become the trend throughout the land. Can we breathe in a sigh of collective relif that at least one piece of good news has arrived after so many setbacks?
EXACTLY -- and bravo to the Nurses Union! I am telling you...i know about what they do ..i know a lot of nurses ...and what they concern themselves with - and how hard they work and how they WISH they had better "nurse or care-giver ratio to patient"...and they KNOW what accounting needs to be done..and about proper "staffing" , and why poor staffing breaks their backs as well as that of their aides and patients suffer, and how medicaire or medicaid has to be cut due to "tax cuts" ELSeWHERE for the corporations and private profiteers...and how they LOVE their patients so much....
on the whole it is the NURSES as well as their aides who provide the most direct, DAILY care for patients in any setting - that most care about their patients ...they and their co-workers are the ones that know what it is about to have to "make it work" minute by minute based on "COST CUTTING" by privatizers while breaking their backs to provide as much HUMANE care for their patients.
it is the NURSES and their Aides and co-workers that directly deal with patients that are the REAL providers of CARE who know the whole score.
AND understand what "costs" are and its relation to LABOR and standards and taxes and privatization or "single-payer".
NURSES are Heroes. believe me.
in a coming month of Remembering and honoring Dr Martin Luther King, Jr...
people should not forget that Dr King began his civil rights and economic rights and justice and fairness march in history starting with the plight of WORKERS in nursing homes ....standing up for the issues that concerned Aides and Nurses.
Wonderful upstaging of Obama who last night didn't ask
for MEDICARE FOR ALL!!
Any chance that Schwartzenegger would veto this?
WHAT WE NEED IN AMERICA IS MEDICARE FOR ALL -- EVERYONE IN,
NO ONE OUT!!
And a shift from corporate government back to a people's government!
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
There are moves afoot at the national level to put single-payer back in play, coming primarily from Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), whose representatives have been blogging at the New York Times today in response to Obama's SOTU challenge for "better ideas."
There is no better idea than single-payer, and the economics are compelling to anyone who honestly looks at the numbers.
Also, Dr Margaret Flowers, also a PNHP activist, delivered a letter to the White House asking for a meeting with Obama to put the case for single-payer.
The timing of the California bill could support those efforts, particularly if the Assembly acts quickly to send the bill on to the Governor.
I have regularly pointed out that regarding Health Care progressing to its PROPER conditions in a civilized society ---
the work and dedication of the NURSES - especially in that California Union of Nurses are of UTMOST importance.
these Nurses are HEROES. THEY know the score:
both from the standpoint of dealing with insurance companies, with their patients, with pharmaceuticals and costs and accounting and being at the "trenches" of being providers of care and being concerned for their patients and those in need of care.
the NURSES , far more than doctors or "adminsistrators" as well as the Aides that work with nurses are the ONES that REALLY know what is going on, what conditions are, what are just wages, what taxes ought to do for care..what "privatization" does...etc...and what the consequences are.
the NURSES are heroes.
One down, 49 to go!
I hope everybody does move to California. The Federal Government would have to bail them out and we would have Single Payer Health Care.
ummm...has anyone heard of a prick called Schwarzenegger??? And the little matter of a veto? Fortunately, he's out this year, but the Supreme Court just took the reins off our corporate sidled state. The next greasy corporate cowboy that gets elected here will blaze into office wearing Pfizer embossed spurs and easily hog tie up our Murdoch owned air waves. The people here do what their TVs tell them to do. No questions asked. We're just as stupid and ill-informed as the rest of the country. When the corporations are through "interviewing" the good citizens of this state bashing "socialized medicine" for the whole nation to see and hear there won't be much left of our common dream of single-payer health care. Our media loves a fat red herring.
We need Jerry Brown as Governor, not some "corporate-funded cowboy" that will veto this California "single payer" bill.
JERRY! JERRY! JERRY!
I hope it works out better than what exists now. My brother has Down Syndrome and is on Medicare and MediCal. When I called to find him a doctor almost all refused to take MediCal. I asked if they could take his Medicare which is primary - they said "no" - because he is on MediCal they would not take him as a patient.
So Sorry that it is like that for your Brother and you trying to care for him.
it just goes to show -- that is another of the nonsensical, cruel realities of the same system that relies on "profit".
as if it's not enough that your brother is already suffering with his condition...because of the way the system is arranged...he and you have to suffer some more. it makes me cry just thinking about it, and what this system does to countless people, when it doesn't have to be that way.
in the past less than a year alone:
I had a severe tooth infection that was so sudden i couldn't go to work...and for nearly 2 days the pain got so bad, i wanted to bash my head on the wall..every second all those hours was real torture..until I could find a clinic that would take me..but first the dentist just gave me a prescripton for the pain, until the swelling went down, and scheduled me for a week later to take the tooth out. no insurance...so I had to pay 200 dollars..not including another 60 dollars for the medication. i was told it was so severe i could have died after a few hours.
this past few weeks - after working extra at work to cover for a fellow worker on vacation - i came down with a bad flu , not H1N1 but "classic flu" as the workplace doctor and nurses told me..by the time i had to be sent home by them, it was already several days old..again , no insurance from work...but he agreed to write a prescription...the pharmacy charged me more than 100 dollars for TEN pills.
adding all the regular cough and cold , flu medicines over the counter I had already bought - that all amounted to at least 200 dollars. just for Flu.
that these two ilnesses came upon me months apart is what "saved" me from being unable to pay for apartment...as each time, it set me back in my budget for at least a month...and had to borrow some money from a friend just to cover food or transport while holding on to the paychecks for the apartment.
just a single illness like any of these is brutal in not just one's condition, but in the finances.
but i know my case is nothing compared to so many millions with worse situations, such as your brother.
this is simply inhumane, barbaric, cruel of a system and is so unworthy of a so-called "greatest nation on earth".
The question isn't whether or not the Guv vetoes Medicare for all, it's whether a popular movement arises in support of Healthcare 4 All, a movement which would be a forerunner to what it'll take to change the world, namely, a mass uprising. What's more there are no alternatives, being that perpetual war + global warming + economic collapse = doomsday, and time's running out.