African Nations Make a Stand at UN Climate Talks
African countries have said they are prepared to provoke a major UN crisis if the US and other rich countries do not start to urgently commit themselves to deeper and faster greenhouse gas emission cuts.
In a dramatic day in Barcelona, UN officials were forced to step in after 55 African countries, in an unprecedented show of unity, called for a suspension of all further negotiations on the Kyoto protocol until substantial progress was made by rich countries on emission cuts.
Earlier, the UN chair had been forced to abandon two working groups after the Africa group refused to take part.
The African countries were supported by all other developing country blocks at the talks. In a series of statements, the G77 plus China group of 130 nations, the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), the Least Developed Countries (LDC) group, as well as Bolivia and several Latin America countries, all broadly backed the African action.
The move by developing countries reflects their deep and growing frustration over the slow progress that industrialised countries are making towards agreeing cuts. With less than three days full negotiating time left between now and the opening of the final talks at Copenhagen, the split between rich and poor countries threatens to blow the talks fatally off course.
Bruno Sekoli, chair of the LDC group, said: "Africa and Africans are dying now while those who are historically responsible are not taking actions."
Algeria, which chairs the Africa group, backed by representatives from Gambia and Kenya, said rich countries were "more concerned with political and economic feasibility" while the poorest were "struggling to survive" with climate change.
In a press conference, the poorest countries demanded that the rich adopt the science-backed target of a 40% overall cut on emissions on 1990 levels. So far, rich countries have pledged an aggregate of less than 10%. The US, the world's second biggest polluter, has pledged to cut around 4% on 1990 levels, or 17% on 2005 levels.
In some of the most frantic diplomacy seen in the talks so far, delegates to hurriedly agreed to dedicate six of the 10 remaining negotiating sessions to discussions on mid-term emissions reductions. The decision received widespread support from all developing countries who stressed the importance of delivering real progress.
"African countries have shown they are not going to sit back and accept a bad deal in Copenhagen," said a spokeswomen for Oxfam international.
"The poorest countries say they are dying now and the rich are just sitting back doing nothing. Hopefully they will take action now," said Asad Rehman, head of international climate with Friends of the Earth.
"The world's largest historical emitter, the US, is missing in action during the climate negotiations, on its targets, on its finance – and the developing world is rightfully calling them out on it," said Greenpeace USA climate campaign director Damon Moglen.
"It is clear that for many countries, enough is enough. The fact that this has come today from countries including Kenya, President Obama's ancestral home, should be his wake-up call. Obama can no longer hide behind failed congressional legislation. He must provide ambitious, science-based emissions reductions targets and come to table in Copenhagen."
The talks, which are some of the most complex ever conducted, depend on all countries eventually agreeing to everything. They would be seriously jeopardised to the point of certain failure in Copenhagen next month if the African countries walk out again.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllClimate change work will have to be bottom up - like everything else that's important to our species. What can we do individually?: better insulation of our homes, higher gas mileage vehicles, fewer trips by car, recycling of all recyclable waste, better use of energy saving technology w/in the home. I've got everything down except for the car.
A lot of this seems like whistling past the graveyard.I'm doing everything you're doing, and I've just donated the beater car, leaving me and my wife with one, a Prius, and a motorcycle ( built in 1934, and amazingly parsimonious in its fuel consumption).I walk everywhere I can, and use the car and the bike only when I have to.All of this makes me feel like I'm making a modest contribution to solving the problem, and I don't feel that my standard of living is being compromised in any way.I'd like to think that millions of people are doing something similar, but I'm probably wrong.
It is going to be interesting to see how Obama responds to the Copenhagen Conference, and whether he will in fact attend. Word out of the Administration in the past few days are implying the need to negotiate a better deal. Ironically it is the old rock song "Light My Fire" that comes to mind, "The time to hesitate is through..." Other voices within the Washington circle are also urging that we have perhaps only months before we are faced with irreparable harm and massive human consequences.
Obama's previous disappointments frighten me as to whether he will now, in this crisis, wither away into perpetual negotiations that disguise inaction. He is reminiscent of Bill Clinton's eight years of doing the Michael Jackson "moonwalk" to progress and change. We still suffer with Guantanamo, the recent reinstatement of the Patriot Act, an Isreali-Palestinian strategy which will not realistically reach an accord in either a four year or an eight year period, the continuing war in Iraq, the first escalation and expansion of the Afghanistan war, and now possibly a second escalation, and a health care proposal from which the insurance companies will likely gain a vast new mandatory market and benefit more than the average, or certainly the poorest, of Americans.
Last year, 2008, was the year we learned the Polar Bear would likely become extinct due to drowning. Yet, the Green Party in the US chose to run an urban agenda campaign.
Mouthing the words of conciliation and the desire for accord is not enough. The American psyche of the rugged individualism is going to require some reworking, and respect for the global village must come to a point of pressure for at least this one issue of CO2 emission reduction.
Let the Iraqis and The Afghanis rebuild themselves. Let us begin to make the commitments to make our personal changes to save the planet. The Africans are right on this. Leadership requires the action of taking a decisive step in the right direction.
I was ashamed as a Canadian to see that Canada's per capita emission of CO2 is right up there next to that of the U.S. Our Tar Sands development is probably a major cause.
I have given away my car and try to do everything I can to minimize my own emissions. We have got to do better--it's a matter of survival for civilization.
Its a little Colder in Canada and we have much vaster distances to travel then they do in Europe but THAT said.
We should and could be far lower in our emissions.
Yes, even Russia, where it's just as cold as Canada, and where both the amount of raw resources available, and the inefficiency of much of their industry, should lead to very high emissions, is doing better than the US and Canada.
Anyone find it remarkable that a Eurpoean can emit just 40-50% of the CO2 as a USAn, yet by all measures, enjoy a better living standard?
And I have trouble believing my personal emssions plus those meitted on my behalf at work can come close to 25 tons a year. I'll try a calculation when I can review my utility bills. I use about 160 gal of gasoline per year. That would be about a ton and a half of CO2.
Having lived in Limeyland for a couple of years, I don't find it remarkable at all.People there live in smaller houses, drive smaller more fuel efficient cars, use more public transport, and in general are less obsessed with Big and Fat than Americans.Everything is scaled down there, and not surprisingly, they wind up using a lot less energy than we do.But as you mentioned, while we are living large (some of us, anyway), they, on the whole, are living better.
per capita = total Co2 emitted divided by total population; not 25tons per each person;
I perfectly understand the concept of a mean value. My implied point was, what exactly is much of the US population doing, or having done purportedly on their behalf, to create such a high average?
factories.
buses.
trucks.
rail.
power plants.
ships.
airplanes.
all the city lights.
lights on in / on downtown office buildings all night.
open doors to air conditioned buildings - supermarkets - malls.
nascar.
shuttling pro sports teams and their entourages city to city.
internet server farms - i.e. some google "server farms" use as much electricity as the city of honolulu...
not continental u.s. but...
any idea how much garbage one navy ship jettisons every day... it's a lot.
had the "total cost of using" 1 KwH of electricity, one Gallon of gas - to each user - been factored in from the beginning... we'd still be riding horses...
Try 50% coal based electric power generation.
Try 22 mpg fleet average for transportation.
Try 1000 sq ft per person for the average home.
Bill
The U.S. is the greatest nation in the history of the world. God Bless America.