Canada Sets Aside Its Boreal Forest as Giant Carbon Vault
By banning logging, mining and oil drilling in an area twice the size of California, Canada is ensuring its boreal forests continue to soak up carbon
In the far north latitudes, buried within a seemingly endless expanse of evergreen forests, the authorities in Canada are building up one of the world's best natural defences against global warming.
In
a series of initiatives, Canadian provincial governments and aboriginal
leaders have set aside vast tracts of coniferous woods, wetlands, and
peat. The conservation drive bans logging, mining, and oil drilling on some 250m acres - an area more than twice the size of California.
The sheer scale of the forest conservation drive is somewhat of an anomaly for Canada, whose government has been accused of sabotaging the global climate change talks by its development of the Alberta tar sands and its refusal to make deep cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions.
Last week, a former adviser to Barack Obama urged Canada to do more to keep up with America's moves towards a cleaner energy economy.
In the latest addition to the carbon storehouse, the provincial premier of Manitoba, Gary Doer, this month announced a $10m (£5.6m) Canadian fund to protect a 10.8m acre expanse of boreal or evergreen forest. It was one of Doer's last acts as premier; he took over as Canada's ambassador to Washington this month.
The $10m will go towards efforts by indigenous leaders to designate boreal forest lands in eastern Manitoba as a Unesco world heritage site. The Pimachiowin Aki world heritage project, which straddles the Manitoba-Ontario border, extends efforts by Canadian provincial leaders to protect the wide swaths of pristine forests in the north. It also ensures the survival of one of the best natural defences against global warming after the world's oceans, environmentalists say.
A report by the International Boreal Conservation Campaign said the forests, with their rich mix of trees, wetlands, peat and tundra, were a far bigger carbon store than scientists had realised, soaking up 22% of the total carbon stored on the earth's land surface.
"If you look across Canada one of [the boreal forest's] great values to us globally is its carbon storage value," said Steve Kallick, director of the Pew Environment Group's International Boreal Conservation Campaign. "There is so much carbon sequestered in it already that if it escaped it would pose a whole new, very grave threat."
Canada's cold temperatures slow decomposition, allowing the build-up of organic soil and peat. The forest floors beneath its evergreens hold twice as much carbon per acre as tropical forests, such as the Amazon.
It is unclear how long Canada's forests can continue to serve as carbon vaults. "As the climate warms, the place is going to dry up. There will be a problem with insect infestation. There is going to be increased natural carbon release due to fire or wetlands drying up," said Sue Libenson, a spokeswoman for the International Boreal Conservation Campaign.
But she added: "The general premise is that there is still a hell of a lot of carbon in there." Its release would be a climate catastrophe.
Canada's 1.3bn acres of boreal forest store the equivalent of 27 years' worth of current global greenhouse gas emissions, a Greenpeace study found. The destruction of those forests, scientists warn, would be like setting off a massive "carbon bomb" because of the sudden release of emissions.
That threat appears to have concentrated the official mindset in Canada, which otherwise has a poor record on action on climate change. On a per capita basis, the country is one of the worst polluters on the planet, producing about 2% of the world's emissions even though it has just 33m people. It holds one of the worst track records among industrialised states for living up to its commitment under the Kyoto accords. By 2007, greenhouse gas emissions were 34% above the target Canada agreed at Kyoto.
Canada's prime minister, Stephen Harper, is resisting doing much more, committing to just a 6% cut over 1990 levels of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. "I see Harper's policy as a continuation of the Bush agenda," said David Martin, climate director for Greenpeace Canada.
A key advisor to Obama made a similar point last week, comparing Canada's current climate change policy to the inaction in America under George Bush. "The Canadians would be well served by keeping up with what's going on in the United States with respect to this push towards clean technology," John Podesta, who oversaw Obama's transition team, told a conference in Ottawa.
Environmentalists also fear that Harper intends to exclude the Alberta tar sands - the heavy crude deposits that have fuelled the rise in emissions - from any future greenhouse gas emissions regime.
But the Harper government did relent on forest protection, working with the Sahtu and Deh Cho First Nations to set aside 40m acres in the Northwest Territories.
Canadian provincial leaders have moved even more aggressively in recent years, with Ontario committed to protecting 55m acres, or about half of its forest, and Quebec committed to protecting 150m acres. "Canada is torn between wanting to promote the tar sands and make money off it now, and wanting to live up to its promises under the Kyoto accord. But as far as protecting carbon rich ecosystems, particularly the boreal forest, Canada is a world leader," said Kallick.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
9 Comments so far
Show All"Canada is torn between wanting to promote the tar sands and make money off it now, and wanting to live up to its promises under the Kyoto accord."
Canada doesn't need to "make" munny off the tar sands. Canada can instead join the world in promoting a different value system in which munny is only a means to an end and not an end in itself. And with universal rights toward universal equity/justice, very little munny is needed at all. So Canada hardly needs to rape/plunder the earth for munny. How sick an idea! Who promotes that?
Large forest deplosits is not enough. There should be a technology push toward renuable clean and cheap energy solutions to replace coal and oil.
While this announcement comes as good news, I wonder if the combination of forestry-dependent small communities and current economic downwards trend will serve to maintain this proclamation.
Logging practices across the country have taken a hit, but there has already been significant clear-cutting (not as selective as they claim to be in their logging practices) of major forests across the country.
They are still logging up close to the ancient groves on vancouver island, the Ogoki forest in Ontario has been heavily decimated for toilet-paper production, drivng along the Northwestern Ontario portion of the Trans-Canada will demonstrate the extent of the logging that has been going ong and they are beginning to size up the forests in the provincial parks for so-called selective cutting - even though one can hardly call the practice of felling the biggest trees regardless of access to it - truly selective logging. Especially when a good deal of wood being cut today, regardless of size, is being converted into pulp.
Let's not even get into the deficiencies of our reforestation practices.
Until the forestry industry comes up with a better plan for producing pulp and paper, namely adapting their industry for the much more renewable and productive hemp-production, then I fear that industry lobbying for continued logging will persist regardless of these proclamations for protecting the forests.
Money overrules future arguments 100% of the time. Tyranny of the present will unnecessarily hurt future generations.
"Last week, a former adviser to Barack Obama urged Canada to do more to keep up with America's moves towards a cleaner energy economy."
That is just SO embarrassing. Its like the local retarded kid urging you to stop crapping your pants...or a homeless person suggesting you bathe more often cause you stink.
Harper's gotta go.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
It's fascinating that the US should be blaming Canada for any of this, and equally interesting that the US should be kvetching that various others - China and India, for instance.
Um, where do the products for all this get shipped?
American interests own some 60% of Canadian business.
I couldn't believe the quote you reproduced, either...to imagine such things actually being said is astounding...weirdly amusing, and confirming...that there are such people to say them, what?
Keep up with US? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Good for my personal neighbor, Canada, though, upon whose ground I have spent much time and from whence I have harvested many fond memories...
As elsewhere, however, a pledge made one day is not a promise kept on another...may your governments, friend Canada, remain diligent in this protection...
I was cringing as well, and realized that in this article Demoks are abusing the media, and abusing the people's concern for the well-being of the biosphere, to promote themselves for electoral gain, a doomed agenda. Under the left boot today is this old idea that elites can forever continue to exploit the people's concerns for selfish gain. No more, No more.
Now let's have the US ban logging on all federal land.
Uh, yeah, except for the tar sands mining area, which is the size of Florida.