Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Green-Jobs Evangelist Sells Obama's Ambitious Plans
WASHINGTON - When Van Jones - Oakland activist, best-selling author and "green jobs" proselytizer - spoke to online political organizers last fall, he couldn't resist kidding them: "You've really messed up. You're about to win this election."
Jones has joked that the prospect of clean energy from coal is as likely as "unicorns pulling our cars," while the president has taken a more flexible approach to ventures in clean-coal technology. (photo: Green for All) Their favorite candidate, Barack Obama, was going to inherit a mess, Jones predicted: "It will be like cleaning out the barn with a straw. I don't know why he even wants the job."
Now Jones has signed on to help clean out the barn.
Obama has lured the 40-year-old Jones into his administration to work on clean-energy issues and become a major spokesman for the president's energy policies. Jones was given the unwieldy title "special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation."
In the Bay Area, Jones gained a reputation as a fierce advocate for racial and economic justice. He shed a spotlight on police abuse in Oakland and San Francisco, successfully fought a "super-jail" for juveniles and became adept at mixing cajolery with confrontation.
Then he launched Green for All, an effort to bring green-energy jobs to poor areas that is now run by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, former head of the South Bay Labor Council.
Jones' book, "The Green Collar Economy," came out in October. Jones emerged as an activist who could bridge the gap between the inner city and the environmental movement.
Then came the call from Obama. Two months into his new job, Jones said he is adjusting to life as a government insider.
"It's like playing a new video game. It's simple when you're an advocate. You have a paddle with two buttons - 'please, please' and 'protest, protest,' " Jones said during a recent interview. "Now it's a much more complex keyboard, and I'm still learning how to read the music sheet."
But he added that his work as a community organizer was "invaluable experience" and not that different from his new job. In both cases, it's all about getting "people to talk with each other and trust each other,'' whether it's community groups or federal agencies.
Environmental groups see Jones as a key ally. "He's a terrific leader," said Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund. "Having him in the White House means we can expect more rapid progress in creating clean-energy jobs."
Jones will coordinate efforts inside government to promote "green jobs" - work in renewable fuels and energy efficiency. He will also be a highly visible point person for Obama's energy plans, including a mandatory cap on carbon emissions.
A dynamic speaker, Jones is equally at home on a black radio station, "The Larry King Show" or the Comedy Channel's "Colbert Report," where he disputed Stephen Colbert's notion that pursuing green jobs was as realistic as "herding unicorns."
He doesn't think it's a pipe dream to combine "greening the ghetto" with fighting global warming. He rejects warnings from some economists that new jobs in the solar and wind industries won't be enough to make up for losses in a declining coal industry.
Jones said he is optimistic because another former community organizer, Obama, is determined to revamp the economy and reduce the nation's reliance on fossil fuels. He also thinks the country, traumatized by the severe recession, is ready for real change.
Jones and Obama aren't always on the same page. Jones has joked that the prospect of clean energy from coal is as likely as "unicorns pulling our cars," while the president has taken a more flexible approach to ventures in clean-coal technology.
Two years ago, Jones wrote that "we are witnessing the slow death of the Earth-devouring, suicidal version of capitalism," and the birth of "eco-capitalism." Now he meets with leaders of major industries, "not just the usual liberal suspects," and listens to their "special needs."
The federal government's task, Jones said, is to invest wisely in clean energy and set the right rules, such as putting a price on carbon emissions. "Then the private sector is going to solve the problems," he added.
Jones also sees a crucial role for information technology and venture capital: "I hope folks in Silicon Valley understand how much the president is counting on them. This whole thing - the idea we can have a clean-energy economy - is a huge bet on the kinds of thinkers and innovators concentrated in the valley."
And while he focuses on his new work in Washington, he still thinks about "the economic desperation" in Oakland, and ways to link fighting climate change and urban poverty:
"Maybe we can not only cool the Earth down, but cool the block down, too."
- Posted in

18 Comments so far
Show AllGovernment funded "green jobs" are not green jobs, thery are simply government funded jobs. This is beginning to look the farce its becoming.
And all law enforcement, education, fire fighting, defense contractor/manufacturing, regulatory jobs are not jobs either, right? They're also a farce?
"This is beginning to look the farce its becoming."
Whats new Thomas. If its Black and it helps inner city black kids its gotta be a farce right ?
The Government is helping to fund Green jobs in Germany and in Sweden too.
Sweden will be energy self sufficient within a few decades. Germany, a country with less then a third the population of the USA is the worlds largest exporter nation with Countries the world over buying her goods with their own dollars.
Meanwhile the US Government spends 1 trillion a year on its Military so that it can steal the resources of other countries.
And the Thomas Mores Condemn Government spending that create green jobs.
I think the US would be a lot further ahead emulating Germany and Sweden.
"became adept at mixing cajolery with confrontation."
Bless your soul my brudda !! Van Jones is simply the best organiser you can meet ... on the streets. He has always been at the forefront of every major protest in the Bay Area these last 10 years as far as i can remember. His attempts to bring a semblance of hope back into inner cities by merging the promise of jobs with green solutions should be highly commended. Im frankly surprised that he went to D.C. though ... hopefully he can translate his ideas to actions.
The capitalist economy produces a ruling class, a handful of men who wield dictatorial power and are accorded material privilege beyond all reason. Karl Marx termed them the bourgeoisie. Capitalism demands unity among this small group based solely on an absolute allegiance to profits. That unity will not be undermined by nationalism, or racism, or anything as silly as sentiment or mysticism. Patriotism and religious belief are for chumps who fight and die in their wars for profit.
Former President George W. Bush was a prop of the bourgeoisie and Barack Obama has now assumed that same role. The silly idea that Barack Obama was ever a man of the people because he spent some time as a community organizer is equally ridiculous in the case of the green huckster, Van Jones. Jones is just playing a different (video) game now.
Eco-capitalism indeed!
The capitalist economic system, whatever clever euphemism might be applied to it, is exhausted and will soon collapse. From the time of the collapse of feudalism and its birth in the Industrial Revolution, capitalism was always destined to become a dominant global force. Globalization will be a historic marker as the zenith of its existence. But globalization robbed the system of the only thing that kept its fatal internal contradictions at bay—-growth. Capitalism has conquered the planet, it has nowhere else to feed. The time of its death is now at hand.
True revolutionaries will fight for socialism, the most profoundly "green" economy ever devised.
Van Jones was on the streets for years, trying to make a difference ... the last time i checked you were still sitting on your a__ and playing with yourself. The ivory tower is a really cool place to chill ... been there myself ... eventually though you gotta get off and do some organizing.
lol, nice rebuttal. I did organizing myself last year for Power Vote but didn't care for it too much. But I definitely acknowledge how important it is.
I like this man, his Green Collar Economy shows his organizing ability and fore sight. Having him in this administration is definitely a step in the right direction to get us off our oil addiction.
The increase in energy from renewables in the U.S. from 2003 thru 2007 was entirely consumed by growth. The only way to "cool the neighborhood" is to stop waste and slow growth. Make public transit free, move to town, educate all children, and give the suburbs to the organic farmers.
http://freepublictransit.org
eco-venture capitalism. and "green-collar jobs"
a) will it work in creating long-term jobs? Not so far --or not yet-- in Europe. Then there's the recession and material cost and demand, and also the government factor is looking very political and geared as supplements for political programs. how does that lure "private sectors" for the transitional phase from subsidies to privately functioning --and who gets to pick the route?
b)and 'green-collar jobs' aren't lobbying and/or political organizing. So what are some green collared jobs and will the most excited voter (college students)actually apply or be qualified for these jobs? Or will there need to be government sponsored programs to train workers?
How many of these "green collared" jobs will be scraped or never take hold if homeowners and consumers reduce consumption and purchase of electricity, but also become do-it-yourself (DIY) and opt out of more expensive product purchases?
It has created long term Jobs In Germany. Hundreds of thousands of them. There are farms in Germany able to fuel 400 homes a year with all electrical needs just by using their barn rooves for solar cells, or the methane from the Manure and the like for bio fuels.
The GREEN economy will be Germanies largest employer by 2020.
pk
Awesome, got a link for that?
I don't know how you can say this when both Germany and Spain have had to reduce their subsidies in solar energy which directly impacts production plants who are trying to stay afloat. Silicon is at an all time high right at the same time of massive market crashes. Energy costs are strapping both governments.
We just don't know yet if these new jobs will sustain under these constraints. That's the long-term question. Without massive government oversight and protections, there is questionable long-term success. new development is rarely successful in the short-term. The above Evangelist also knows federal oversight is an issue for interested private companies, hence his desire to promise the federal subsidies/oversight will end with private companies taking over. But take over when and take over what is the question.
An example of a green company in the US is the Chicago Republican Windows and Doors company recently championed as a labor rights accomplishment. The new CA owners business plan is dependent on federal green incentives for manufacturing green windows. It supplements the overhead, but they still need a buyer. In the short-term, I suspect the buyer will be the Chicago School District seeing how Obama just gave the schools a chunk of cash for new construction. But in the long-term, I don't know if there will be a market in Chicago and if people afford to take out a line of credit to buy updated supplies.
There is surely hope and optimism and I think a good place to look is at all the DIY types coming up with novel ideas to reduce, recycle, and conserve energy and resources. If the end result reduces carbon footprints this is good, but if it ends up reducing the projected green market of the future that the federal government's subsidized programs and start up funds are banking on, then what?
Last time I checked, coal and oil also have long-term government protection and subsidies. We go to war over fossil fuels to acquire and protect them. Do you think the subsidies for renewable energy will be nearly as much as that for fossil fuels? I don't think so.
You seem to misunderstand my concerns evident by your snide circular reasoning.
You need more examples? Local, state, and federal governments provide roads for use. Instead of people who drive on them paying. How is that not an eternal subsidy for oil? Everything new needs a subsidy. And some very old things need to have their subsidies ended.
Don't allow the elites to co-opt the people's movement. Kick the elites off the bandwagon.