Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- 'Biggest Act of Civil Disobedience in Canadian History'
Popular content
Today's Top News
Young Activists Fired Up in Fight Against Coal
JOHNSONVILLE, S. Carolina - Outside the high school here Tuesday night, as people gathered for a public hearing, three young women wrestled with a big black inflatable coal plant that looked similar to a jump castle - except for the words "CLEAN UP DIRTY COAL PLANTS NOW" on the side.
Across the country, anti-coal activists, many of them students in their 20s, are attending hearings and engaging in demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience reminiscent of the protests their parents might have seen in the 1970s against nuclear plants. (Sierra Club) One
woman trying in vain to get the prop's smoke stacks raised was Katheryn
Hilton, 20, of Aiken, who two months ago spent 11 hours in jail after
being arrested at a demonstration at a coal plant in Virginia. Hilton
said coal is a dirty technology that will spew mercury into the air and
waterways and contribute to global warming.
Next to her, Sara Tansey, 20, looked for leaks. She took a year off from the University of South Carolina to fight the coal industry. "There are lots of young people who got engaged on the climate and energy issue during the election," she said. "I think young people are really awakening to injustice of the whole life cycle of coal."
Across the country, anti-coal activists, many of them students in their 20s, are attending hearings and engaging in demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience reminiscent of the protests their parents might have seen in the 1970s against nuclear plants.
It's a big change from the 1990s when utilities went on a coal-plant construction binge with little or no controversy. But today, projects such as Santee Cooper's plan to build its Pee Dee coal plant face a new generation activists, along with the usual cadre of established environmental groups.
"It's a little intimidating to be here with people in their 40s and 50s," said Sara Sprehn, 19, a sophomore at the College of Charleston. She and seven others from the college drove two hours to attend a state Department of Health and Environmental Control hearing about the plant's effect on state waterways. "We're educated about the issues, and we want our opinions to be heard."
Santee Cooper is seeking state and federal permits to build two 600-megawatt generators.
As part of the permitting process, DHEC and the Army Corps of Engineers must hold a series of public hearings. Tuesday's focus was on water quality, and about 200 people gathered in the Johnsonville High School gymnasium to support or oppose the project.
As in past hearings, some argued that the new plant would create new jobs. Santee Cooper officials insisted that the plant would be the cleanest of its kind. Their supporters said without the plant, the region could face brownouts and blackouts.
Meanwhile, other residents said they worry that the coal plant will pollute the air and waterways and contribute to global warming. Some cited information from the recent Post and Courier series "Toxic Ash," which revealed that coal ash is contaminating groundwater at some landfills and ponds with arsenic and other heavy metals many times the federal drinking water limit.
DHEC officials said they plan to take these comments into account as they decide whether to grant Santee Cooper a permit, but government regulators and environmental groups all have said they expect the matter to end up in a court battle.
A wild card in the coal debate is whether anti-coal activists take the matter to different arenas.
In the past several months, protesters picketed a coal plant in Kansas. They formed human barriers outside a plant in Virginia, where Hilton and 10 others were arrested.
In April, activists locked themselves to bulldozers outside a Duke Power plant under construction in western North Carolina and spread a banner that said "Global Warming Crime Scene." Police used stun guns to control some of the demonstrators and arrested eight people. This fall, Al Gore said, "We've reached the stage where it's time for civil disobedience to prevent construction of new coal-fired power plants that do not have sequestration."
During the hearing, Hilton became emotional as she talked about her concerns. She said she drove four hours to be here and had a four-hour drive back that night. "I'm here representing thousands of South Carolina youths who say coal is not the answer to the state's energy problems."
Special reports
Read the special report series on mercury from The Post and Courier.
Also see the special report series on toxic ash from The Post and Courier.
- Posted in

12 Comments so far
Show AllHere in Appalachia, we can't stand anymore of Presidebt Bush's prosperity. Wise County, Virginia is becoming a toxic waste dump, third world America.
http://www.wisecountyissues.com
"CLEAN UP DIRTY COAL PLANTS NOW"
This is already happening. Obama has promised funding for clean coal.
There is no such thing as "clean" coal. Getting energy from coal means you are burning dirt. That's a simple way of putting it, but my point is you can never make such a process "clean." You can make it less dirty, but it will never be anywhere near as clean as renewable forms of power generation.
Coal companies will label any plant they are proposing "clean" whether it actually has the cleanest technology or not. This is a form of green washing they use based on the idea that new plants will be cleaner than plants built 50 years ago. This is true, but the vast majority of these plants are nothing resembling what a non-psychotic person would call clean.
None of these plants are doing anything to address CO2 either. There was a recent court ruling requiring one plant in Utah to regulate CO2 as a pollutant, which could be precedence in fighting coal plant cases, and which could be the greatest weapon coal activists have acquired to date:
http://www.coalblock.org/latest-updates/news-mainmenu-2/13-news-release/140-ruling-coal-plants-must-limit-c02.html
For more information I suggest perusing http://www.coalblock.org and feel free to contact me - my information is on that site. We also have a community site that you can join and get involved in discussions and ask questions about these issues.
"Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the shadow"
We're talking about future technology here, not technology that currently exists. You make some good points, but I feel I can trust Obama to do the right thing.
To trust any "leader" who probably hasn't talked to a non-millionaire in months, and gets all his advice from the elite business interests who largely funded his campaign, is to put it mildly, a bit naive, isn't it?
I find you attitude toward Obama rather frightening. It is clear from his initial planned appointments that we have the fight of our lives coming up if we are going to get Obama to do anything right.
The technology to capture the carbon emission is the easy part. A large power plant produces dozens of tons of CO2 every single second. Designers are only beginning to whimsically conceptualize the infrstructure needed to get such volumes of CO2 underground - yet we only have 10 years to make deep cuts in carbon emissions.
And it is all unnecessary if we develop the huge Plains-States wind resources in conjunction with a massive new smart grid to distribute it. (Something Obama at least supports too to his credit)
---USAn---
Pandonodrim: You're right. "Clean coal" are two mutually exclusive words. Coal cronies keep trying to push CO2 sequestration in the ground but, to date, there is no sizeable sequestration going on. Besides, why put money into this technology when it could be spent more wisely on truly RENEWABLE energy sources. Coal is dangerous to mine, dirty to transport and filthy to burn. Unless, of course, you own a mine.
I trust Barack Obama to do the right thing here, too, but if he supports coal at all, it will be a stupid move.
http://freesolaradvice.blogspot.com
Obama unambiguously supports investing in clean coal. You cannot predict scientific progress. We must invest in the future. Science has accomplished many things previously thought impossible.
You are completely hopeless, Joe. With all the facts available on the pollution and costs of even "clean coal,' you still parrot vacuous comments about trusting Obama. You also trust the Easter bunny and the tooth fairy, right? Stick your head back in the ground where you can keep up your delusions.
With due respect for the power of mercury in the air to stunt the growth of children's brains, I'm quite surprised that global warming is knocked down to a #2 position in the list of arguments against coal.
It is quite heartening to see the youth starting to become more activist.
It's great to see kids getting in the face of Big Coal. After all, coal-burning power plants are the biggest polluters in the world. Burnt coal gives off a fine black particulate leading to any number of respiratory ailments and the CO2 emissions are proving catastrophic. In the 90s Germany actually factored in the cost for health care and absenteeism from work and school when they determined the true cost of producing a kilowatt hour of electricity from coal. When all was said and done, solar and wind power looked real good as alternative and RENEWABLE power sources despite Germany's northern latitude. Today, Germany leads the world in photovoltaic systems installed.
Just yesterday, Barack Obama committed the U.S. to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emission by 80% nationally by 2050. Finally, the fight against global warming is heating up here.
BTW, Sun Microsystems is offering a FREE GHG calculator for organizations who need to start tracking CO2 emissions. Another firm, Enviance, is having a free web seminar on GHG accounting on Dec. 9. For further information go to:
http://freesolaradvice.blogspot.com
Viewed some clips at the site that pandonodrim provided. Watching Texas governor Perry and his petrified coiff brought back fond memories of Molly Ivins.
Thank you to all the younger folks who are fighting this vital issue
I've heard that the McMansions in Shaker Heights,Ohio,Westchester County and elsewhere can be bulldozed to mine the unrelenting greed beneath.This hyper-powerful greed need only to be converted to humane uses with a bit of Fung Shei.