This article was published on Monday, May 29 - Memorial Day, 2007:
The nation pays its respects today to those who have fallen in America's wars. The central ritual of our communal bereavement takes place with a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington , Va. Because those remains are anonymous, they are fitting representatives of the entire legion of war dead, who are the focus of affection on Memorial Day.When we send men and women off to battle for the sake of the nation's greater good, we promise that, should they not return, their sacrifice will always be remembered. It is the minimum such heroes are due. But because the nation is at war today, the observance has special poignancy, and added pain. Like numerous graves at Arlington, the grief of all too many families is fresh. Given the kind of war this is, however, the mourning is for more than departed individuals.
Is it presumptuous to imagine we can know something about those whose lives were lost, perhaps even the "unknowns"? The military women and men who have been killed in war wanted more from life than they got. They began by believing in a higher cause, but ended up, from every frontline report, caring most about the buddies to their right and left. They saw the horrors of combat, but what really frightened them was the threat of moral collapse as feelings of anger, fear, and, perhaps, revenge replaced the stately cohesion of the drill.
Trained in glory, they died in absurdity. On Memorial Day, can we pay tribute to the dead without falsifying what befell them?
"If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted," the Vietnam novelist Tim O'Brien wrote, "or if you feel that some small bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie." O'Brien says that the hallmarks of truth, when it comes to war stories, are obscenity and evil. "You can tell a true war story if it embarrasses you."
Such dark notes are struck by the chroniclers of every war, going back to Homer, but they seem especially apt when those being mourned have fallen in a war that, even before its end, has already shown itself to have been mistaken from its first trumpet.
That recognition compounds American grief on this Memorial Day. In addition to the bright faced young men and women for whom taps has sounded, "a secure sense of the goodness of the social order is irretrievably lost and must be mourned." The psychiatrist Jonathan Shay, treating veterans, wrote that in response to Vietnam, but the observation applies equally to Iraq.
Even the most diehard of American commanders and politicians show signs of recognizing the strategic and (therefore) moral futility of the war in Iraq, which is why they are tangled in the impossible snares of what-to-do-now. The nation, meanwhile, has a larger problem, which is only apparently less pressing: How to reckon with the strategic and moral damage the United States has done and is still doing to the shared well-being of the human family?
In addition to the lives it has needlessly destroyed, the war has helped ignite the most volatile region on earth; it has polluted US relations with former allies; and it has resuscitated the armed suspicions of former enemies. What of more value has been lost than the golden opportunity at the end of the Cold War to further empty nuclear arsenals, to midwife international structures of law, to heal the planet's poisoned environment, to address the global crisis of southern poverty?
Memorial Day is a time of social grief. We deliberately call to mind the names and faces of the dead. We attend to their selfless patriotism, and the courage with which they conducted themselves. We insist that, no matter how misbegotten the cause in which they died, they did not die in vain.
In the glorious past, that faith depended on carrying wars forward to the point of victory, which alone redeemed the mortal loss. But now, we eulogize the heroes without approving the war that killed them. Because today's national desolation must include a larger grief for lost American virtue, the determination that the fallen not have died in vain requires that their sacrifice be taken as a fuller opening to the truths both of what our leaders have wrought, and of the responsibility that belongs to us all.
The proper memorial to the war in Iraq is its immediate end.
James Carroll's column appears regularly in the Globe.
© Copyright 2007 The Boston Globe
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllSeriously, the Boston Globe has always been a right-wing mouthpiece. Carroll, you are exactly what is wrong with the democrats.
How about sparing a thought for the millions of 'lesser breeds' murdered world-wide :merely because it was the will of "the American people"- who are the equal of the Almighty God Himself, perhaps.
(That phrase used at the drop of a hat by every wretched Yank - makes one's stomach turn over and the skin fairly crawl.)
The 'kill ratios ' :
Vietnam War : a minimum of 3 million dead vs 58000 Americans.
Iraq War : nearly a million dead vs. 3500 of the 'coalition of the willing'.
would have made even a Holocaust-hardened Himmler green with envy.
Ah but then these are mere 'collateral damage'.
Where is the Westerner's much -touted 'humanity' -or are these just so much sub-human vermin - fit only for extermination.
The proper memorial to the war in Iraq is its immediate end.
Using James Carroll's own words and logic , carpet-bombing Iraq with enough conventional and nuclear war-heads to kill every single living person in and around Iraq would bring the war to its immediate end thus be a proper memorial: genocide.
The only proper memorial to this war or any war would be to those servicemen obviously still living who refused to bear arms when the invasion of an adversary-country was pre-emptive.
Did James Carroll oppose the war publicly from the beginning as being a war-crime and therefore agreeing according to Geneva Conventions that all perpetrators from privates to generals being justly described as war criminals and thus not worthy of a memorial or suddenly have those same soldiers become worthy of a memorial because the essentially loyal , patriotic , innocent , self-sacrificing , obedient servicemen were duped into believing that the commands of the president trunped the commands of their consciences and the "commands"of the Constitution of USA?
Why should a memorial be erected to men and women who don't know , believe or uphold the Document on which all American laws are based ?
Why should a memorial be erected to men and women who forsake their consciences behave more heinously than dock-side bullies with the excuse that they were commanded to do it?
"I think that human beings are body, mind and soul and integrity means combining body mind and soul so that they are all part of you. If we lack any one of them, the others are a little less valid." –Dave Dellinger_
as i remember the unnecessary dead from my generation's war; (vietnam) i do mourn the loss of legitimacy, trust, and connection i feel towards my government. as a bumper sticker says so well: i love my country but fear my government.
There is no war. We have beaten beaten up these people for 16 years. How many more people must we kill to make a point. Like the america indians used to say white man speaks with fork tounge. Bush is fighting the people he fired and because the civilian are pissed that he did a bad job.
It is so good to see someone like James Carroll present the big picture of what we have done to ourselves and others. This is a horrible mess that the USA has made. We can mourn in spades. One would have thought that one Vietnam, one war of folly, would be enough to teach us a lesson. We seem to be slow learners and stupid voters.
This article makes me want to vomit. The past was not glorious; neither is the army anything other than a brutal, divisive, cruel group of thugs out to destroy the world.
Stop turning our children into war criminals.
Bring the troops home.
James Carroll has never written more truthfully. I wish I knew how to get this column before the eyes of those who entangled us in this immoral war.
This is an undeclared war fought for political power, to gain power, to hold power, and as such has been from the first a criminal endeavor, and our soldiers have become criminals for the rest of their lives and they know it.
It's NOT a WAR-It's a CONTINUOUS AND EXPANDING OCCUPATION!
No, NMBill, it is not just what you said. The tombstones in Sec. 60 of Arlington Cemetery carry the designation of place/cause of death "Operation Iraq Freedom".
Thus this administration of sociopaths denies the fallen the dignity of having fallen in a "war", but are consigned to the PR flakery of a sales pitch.
What a dishonor, what chuzpah, what cynicism!
Is there nothing so cheap, so tawdry, so tarnished that Dumbya won't use it for his personal fame and glory.