Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
House Has Long History of Political Cowardice, Prolific Use of 'Deeming Resolutions'
Congressional Democrats have done a bit of homework and found, not so surprisingly, that the House has a long history of using parliamentary tactics to avoid tough votes. The lack of courage exhibited by today's members, it turns out, is nothing special.
The first time that the chamber used what's known as a "deeming resolution" -- the mechanism Democrats are leaning toward using to pass the Senate health care bill through the House -- was March 16, 1933.
Then, as now, it involved a bill that had little support in the chamber among individual Democrats, but all of them knew they had to pass it. Very few Democrats want to vote for the Senate version of health care reform, but most are okay with it as long as it's amended through reconciliation.
Less than two weeks into FDR's first 100 days, Congress needed to raise its debt ceiling, a ritual vote that hasn't gotten any easier for the majority party in the intervening 77 years -- and is still political fodder for partisan opponents.
Instead of voting on the underlying Senate bill to raise the debt ceiling in 1933, the House voted on Resolution 63, which stated that "immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the bill H.R. 2820, with Senate amendments thereto, be, and the same hereby is, taken from the Speaker's table to the end that all Senate amendments be, and the same are hereby, agreed to."
In other words, it was deemed passed and sent to the president for his signature.
There was some confusion on the House floor about the process.
"Mr. Speaker, a parliamentary inquiry," said Rep. Bertrand Snell (R-N.Y.), according to a transcript unearthed by Democrats. "Mr. Speaker, it would seem to me that if we adopt this resolution that ends the bill and there is no further vote on the bill itself."
"That is correct," Speaker Henry Rainey (D-Ill.) told Snell.
"I understood the gentleman from Alabama to say that we would then vote for or against the bill," responded Snell.
That gentleman then corrected himself. "No; the gentleman from Alabama was mistaken," said Rep. John McDuffie (D-Ala.).
"If we adopt this resolution, we pass the bill," Snell clarified.
Yes, said McDuffie. "We have then concurred in the Senate amendment, and, therefore, the bill is passed, so far as the House is concerned," he said.
"And there is no other vote on the bill," said Snell.
"No other vote on the bill, as I understand it," said McDuffie.
"That is correct," chimed in the Speaker.
Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the second-ranking Republican in the House, said modern-day Democrats are using "gimmicks" to bend the rules. Republicans, however, have often made use of the deeming resolution themselves -- 36 times in 2005 and 2006, when they controlled the lower chamber. Democrats used deeming resolutions 49 times in 2007 and 2008.
The GOP wasted no time using it as soon as they took the majority in 1948. This time it was left to former Speaker Sam Rayburn (D-Texas), who would retake the gavel in 1949, but was briefly in the minority, to wonder about the maneuver.
The issue again was the debt limit.
"Mr. Speaker, a parliamentary inquiry," ventured Rayburn.- Posted in

6 Comments so far
Show AllIf you wanted something like medicare for all, why didn't you vote for a party that supported that?
Hello!
Why even bother with the House of Representatives?
From the Senate's viewpoint, the House's job is just to rubber stamp the Senate's legislation. Obama and the Democrats have no problem saying the House (435 members) has to cave to the Senate (100 members) because the Senate doesn't have the votes; but they will never say the Senate, with fewer members, has to cave to the House. In other words, by choice, they are conceding more power to the Senators. This wouldn't be possible without House leadership complicity.
The problem isn't the parliamentary procedure, the problem is it's a terrible bill that will force the poorest most vulnerable Americans to buy marked up mediocre insurence from the criminal insurance cartel.
I'd have no problem with whatever process to get single payer, but this health insurance reform not so much. This sort of inside politics wonkery obscures the real issue and wastes time debating that instead of directly confronting bad policy.
A corrupt bill pushed by corrupt leadership.
If they pass this piece of trash by any other than an honest vote they will identify themselves as the most corrupt congress ever.
Guess they couldn't find a single photo of a cowardly congress-critter to accompany the article.