Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Barack Obama to Order Salary Cuts at Bailed-Out Firms
President Obama's 'pay tsar' looks to curb boardroom excess • Executive packages to fall by 50% on average
The US government is preparing to order bailed-out banks and car companies to slash the cash salaries of their top executives by an average of 90% in an effort to quell outrage over multimillion-dollar boardroom excess.
Kenneth Feinberg, the US treasury's so-called pay tsar charged with vetting remuneration, intends to tell seven struggling firms still dependant on taxpayer dollars that their 25 highest-paid executives must accept severe year-on-year cuts. The biggest drops will be in salaries. But after taking into account bonuses, stock options and other elements, total pay packages are set to fall by an average of about 50%.
Feinberg's power only extends to companies that are yet to repay government aid. The firms concerned include the struggling banks Citigroup and Bank of America, plus the insurer AIG.
Also on the list are the Detroit car manufacturers General Motors and Chrysler, and the car companies' financing arms, Chrysler Financial and GMAC.
A mediation specialist formerly responsible for settling compensation claims for victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks, Feinberg has spent the last two months scrutinising pay proposals submitted by bailed-out businesses. His findings, due to be formally released within the next week, were leaked to US media yesterday.
Several individuals have already acquiesced to Feinberg's will. Bank of America's soon to retire chief executive, Ken Lewis, last week announced that he will forgo his $1.5m (£900,000) salary this year, under pressure from Feinberg.
Other ordinances will require any "frills" worth more than $25,000, such as country club membership, limousines or private aircraft, to be subject to government approval. And Feinberg is likely to insist on a division between the roles of chairman and chief executive.
Speaking at a conference on Tuesday, Feinberg suggested that he faced an almost impossible task in pleasing everybody: "The incredible gap, the chasm, between Wall Street perceptions and main street perceptions, is a formidable chasm that I'm not sure can be bridged, although the law requires me to bridge that chasm."
Most of Wall Street's top earning institutions, including Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, will escape the crackdown as they have repaid government aid. But AIG has been ordered to make good on its promise to cut back $198m of bonuses paid to staff at its financial products division, which sparked Congressional fury and death threats to certain executives involved.
The cuts, however, may not be as uniformly deep as they sound. Some top individuals have already given up virtually all of their pay, skewing the average reduction. For example, Citigroup's chief executive, Vikram Pandit, has committed himself to working for a salary of $1 until the bank returns to health. And in an effort to head off controversy, Citigroup is selling an energy trading arm, Phibro, where British-born star trader Andrew Hall is in line for a bonus of nearly $100m.
Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the US senate, said government intervention was inevitable, given the amount of money committed to bailout efforts: "If the federal government is a partner, in effect, in these companies, then it ought to have some say on compensation."
But Wall Street, banks and Republicans have vigorously opposed any moves by the Obama administration to go further by enforcing pay restrictions at banks operating without government aid.
Feinberg's move against top corporate pay came as Obama's former "car tsar" attacked the "stunningly poor management" he encountered at Detroit's carmakers as he worked to avert a collapse of the biggest US auto firms this year.
Steve Rattner, a former private equity executive, was the treasury secretary Timothy Geithner's top adviser on the car industry between February and July - when the US government acted to rescue both General Motors and Chrysler.
In an article for Fortune magazine, Rattner offered a savage verdict on the leadership culture at the industrial giants, singling out GM's former boss Rick Wagoner for his "friendly arrogance", and top executives' reluctance to mix with workers.
"Everyone knew Detroit's reputation for insular, slow-moving cultures," he said. "Even by that low standard, I was shocked by the stunningly poor management we found, particularly at GM, where we encountered, among other things, perhaps the weakest finance operation any of us had ever seen in a major company."
Rattner attacked GM's top executives for sequestering themselves on the top floor of the Renaissance Centre skyscraper in Detroit, with exclusive lifts, to avoid mixing with lower-ranking "drones".
In March, the White House forced Wagoner to step down as a condition for more funding to keep GM afloat. Rattner accused him of blaming everyone else for the company's difficulties. "Rick set a tone of 'friendly arrogance' that seemed to permeate the organisation," he said.
- Posted in

9 Comments so far
Show AllI have an idea that would save the US a lot of money;
Every Republican senior citizen that does not support a national health care program should refuse Social Security and Medicare benefits. This would help pay for national health care and provide a cost of living raise for senior Democrats that support the president.
i've seen plenty of senior residents in nursing homes -- watching Fox News all day - and being served through their Social security and medicaire and medicaid combination packages along with whatever private insurance they have -
sometimes railing against "socialism".....hardly realizing the irony of their own condition.
teddy - that's why "Medicare For All" is such a teflon slogan. It makes immediate sense. It's hard to advocate taking away Medicare when almost every family in the US benefits from it, either directly or from the peace of mind knowing that they do not have to choose between taking care of elderly parents' medical needs and going broke as opposed to neglecting their parents.
Joe
Is it salary only? It should be TOTAL COMPENSATION including salaries, bonuses, retirement packages, options, golden parachutes etc. The only talent these guys have shown is the ability to bring down the world economy while sitting protected in their personal bubbles of wealth. If it were up to me, I would ask them to return their bloated salaries from prior years to pay damages to all those who have lost jobs, retirement savings, homes and medical coverage.
Joe
"Ask them to return their bloated salaries..." No. Get the bailout money back by confiscating their phony profits if necessary and let them fail. Take themn over, break them up and sell them off as local banks.
Mitch McConnell is right that this was inevitable but it doesn't make it less stupid. Barry Commoner once said you couldn't regulate most things. They were either done or not done. His example was DDT production. Same here. We should never have bailed anyone out and the stupidity of that decision is like the gift that keeps on giving.
This is a public relation campaign to mollify the public and obscure the fundamental fact that what is needed is a root-to-branch reform of the financial system.
Mervin King, the governor of Bank of England, recently advocated that the casino, the speculative part of banking should be split off from the utility, the money transaction and lending part. This was the way more or less it was before the repeal of Glass-Steagall act. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and/or an insurance company. This provision was repealed by Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Obama wagging a finger at executive pay may be an effective populist posture, but it will not prevent another massive taxpayer bailout of the likes of Goldman in not so distant future
Ooooh, the "Robber Barons" won't like that - better to just hang the bunch of them now.
See, once in a while he makes me like him again.
"Feinberg's power only extends to companies that are yet to repay government aid. The firms concerned include the struggling banks Citigroup and Bank of America, plus the insurer AIG."
Is Feinberg on the payroll of Goldman Sachs, or did he simply forget that Goldman received $$Billions from the bailout money that AIG got and never returned that money to taxpayers? Is it any wonder why Goldman Sachs is called Government Sachs by the slime on Wall Street?