Bailed-Out US Banks Gave Employees Billions in Bonuses in 2008, Report Says
Citigroup, one of the biggest recipients of US government bailout money, gave employees $5.3bn in bonuses for 2008, New York's attorney general said today in a report detailing the payouts by nine big banks.
The report from attorney general Andrew Cuomo's office focused on 2008 bonuses paid to the initial nine banks that received loans under the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (Tarp) last fall. Cuomo has joined other government officials in criticising the banks for paying out big bonuses while accepting US taxpayer money.
Citigroup, which gave 738 of its employees bonuses of at least $1m, is now one-third owned by the US government as a result of its bailout. It paid bonuses of at least $3m to 124 of those employees, even after it lost $18.7bn during the year, Cuomo's office said.
The New York-based bank received $45bn in government money and guarantees to protect it against hundreds of billions of dollars on potential losses from risky investments.
Bank of America, which also received $45bn in Tarp money, paid $3.3bn in bonuses, with 172 employees receiving at least $1m. Of those, 28 received bonuses of more than $3m. Merrill Lynch, which Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America acquired during the credit crisis, paid out $3.6bn.
Cuomo's office said Merrill Lynch doled out 696 bonuses of at least $1m for 2008, with 149 of those workers getting bonuses of at least $3 million.
Bank of America has been sharply criticised for its acquisition of Merrill Lynch because of mounting losses at the Wall Street bank and the size of bonuses Merrill paid its employees.
A spokesman for Citigroup was not immediately available to comment on the report. Bank of America did not immediately comment on the report.
But the banks have said they needed to pay their top performing employees to prevent them from defecting to competitors. Companies that accepted Tarp money have had to comply with government restrictions on employee compensation, including bonuses.
JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, which have already repaid Tarp funds they received, paid out the most bonuses of more than $1m, the report said. However, they were considered among the healthiest of the bailed-out companies.
JPMorgan, which gave 1,626 employees of at least $1m, paid back the $25bn it received in Tarp money last month. Goldman, which repaid its $10bn in government money last month as well, gave 953 workers bonuses of at least $1m. The two banks each gave more than 200 employees bonuses of more than $3m.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
60 Comments so far
Show AllThose giving and receiving bonus' while working at bailed out banks have absolutely nothing on the worst Third World kleptocrats that have crawled out of the slime.
The answer is as plain as the nose on your face. The people have the power all along. If people would just stop doing business with these crooks they would either change or go out of Business. Close your accounts with these banks, open accounts with credit unions. The American people are saving more of their income than ever before,dont put the the money in these wall street banks.Without customers they cant exist.
JJ Apple...thanks for your post!
I like your expression: Mass- Passive America, this could be the name of the 'psychic virus', as Jung defined them, that has spread to epidemic proportions throughout North America.
As to your request for any "ideas, suggestions or additional perspectives..." I can only add that Jung himself placed great emphasis on the responsibility of the individual to increase his/her own consciousness through the painful efforts outlined in the individuation process, which in brief, involves a dispassionate and truthful examination of one's shadow (inferior and repressed personality traits), followed by a moral response which amounts to an integration of these qualities which in effect enhances and expands consciousness. After the painstaking work of integrating one's personal shadow one moves on to identify the collective shadow and begin the much more difficult work of dealing with one's partial involvement in the collective unconscious, shadow emanations and projections. The psychological hypothesis explicates the notion that the catastrophic consequences of a mass psychosis will be ameliorated to a degree corresponding to the number of people who have achieved an 'individuated' state; differentiated and awakened from identification with the mass unconsciousness, a collective persona if you will and in this case mass psychosis. It points to the idea of the hundredth monkey phenomenon and the idea in esoteric spirituality where one enlightened master can awaken multitudes of sleeping souls. All who have done this type of work will feel an inclination, a moral and social responsibility, to do what ever they can to assist in the process of the evolution of consciousness and the healing of the illness diagnosed in the collective psyche. This science ought to be taught throughout the education curriculum so that our youth will have a firm understanding of the psychological processes that affect social and collective behavior. Understanding goes a long way to healing an illness of the psyche!
Best wishes
Risingdawn
As economist, Peter Schiff recently quipped:
“Why fret about growing unemployment lines when banks are paying big-time bonuses again?”
How many $TRILLIONS are taxpayers on the hook for with the FDIC insuring banking institution assets and Fannie and Freddie buying up the toxic assets the banks don't want on their books?
So much for the "free market" and "fractional reserve banking".....and a government of, by and for the Wall Street rich and super-rich.
This American obsession with money is repulsive.
This is one of the most sensible diagnosis of our present situation.
Sociopathic Paychecks
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that "Executives and other highly compensated employees now receive more than one-third of all pay in the US... Highly paid employees received nearly $2.1 trillion of the $6.4 trillion in total US pay in 2007, the latest figures available."
This article is largely excerpted from Thom Hartmann's new book "Threshold: The Crisis of Western Culture."
One of the questions often asked when the subject of CEO pay comes up is, "What could a person such as William McGuire or Lee Raymond (the former CEOs of UnitedHealth and ExxonMobil, respectively) possibly do to justify a $1.7 billion paycheck or a $400 million retirement bonus?"
It's an interesting question. If there is a "free market" of labor for CEOs, then you'd think there would be a lot of competition for the jobs. And a lot of people competing for the positions would drive down the pay. All UnitedHealth's stockholders would have to do to avoid paying more than $1 billion to McGuire is find somebody to do the same CEO job for half a billion. And all they'd have to do to save even more is find somebody to do the job for a mere $100 million. Or maybe even somebody who'd work the necessary sixty-hour weeks for only $1 million.
So why is executive pay so high?
I've examined this with both my psychotherapist hat on and my amateur economist hat on, and only one rational answer presents itself: CEOs in America make as much money as they do because there really is a shortage of people with their skill set. And it's such a serious shortage that some companies have to pay as much as $1 million a day to have somebody successfully do the job.
But what part of being a CEO could be so difficult-so impossible for mere mortals-that it would mean that there are only a few hundred individuals in the United States capable of performing it?
In my humble opinion, it's the sociopath part.
CEOs of community-based businesses are typically responsive to their communities and decent people. But the CEOs of most of the world's largest corporations daily make decisions that destroy the lives of many other human beings.
Only about 1 to 3 percent of us are sociopaths-people who don't have normal human feelings and can easily go to sleep at night after having done horrific things. And of that 1 percent of sociopaths, there's probably only a fraction of a percent with a college education. And of that tiny fraction, there's an even tinier fraction that understands how business works, particularly within any specific industry.
Thus there is such a shortage of people who can run modern monopolistic, destructive corporations that stockholders have to pay millions to get them to work. And being sociopaths, they gladly take the money without any thought to its social consequences.
Today's modern transnational corporate CEOs-who live in a private-jet-and-limousine world entirely apart from the rest of us-are remnants from the times of kings, queens, and lords. They reflect the dysfunctional cultural (and Calvinist/Darwinian) belief that wealth is proof of goodness, and that that goodness then justifies taking more of the wealth.
Democracy in the workplace is known as a union. The most democratic workplaces are the least exploitative, because labor has a power to balance capital and management. And looking around the world, we can clearly see that those cultures that most embrace the largest number of their people in an egalitarian and democratic way (in and out of the workplace) are the ones that have the highest quality of life. Those that are the most despotic, from the workplace to the government, are those with the poorest quality of life.
Over time, balance and democratic oversight will always produce the best results. An "unregulated" marketplace is like an "unregulated" football game - chaos. And chaos is a state perfectly exploited by sociopaths, be they serial killers, warlords, or CEOs.
By changing the rules of the game of business so that sociopathic business behavior is no longer rewarded (and, indeed, is punished - as Teddy Roosevelt famously did as the "trustbuster" and FDR did when he threatened to send "war profiteers" to jail), we can create a less dysfunctional and more egalitarian society. And that's an important first step back from the thresholds to environmental and economic disaster we're now facing.
It's uncanny just how much your analysis resembles Thom Hartmann's. You are EVEN a psychotherapist as he. In any event your missive makes sense to me. These swine are soulless, heartless scumbags richly deserving a spot in hell. Sure hope it exists.
"These swine are soulless, heartless scumbags richly deserving a spot in hell. Sure hope it exists."
Now there's hope I can believe in.
Okay, we know about all of this. Will anything happen as a result? It's a rip-off of every American taxpayer.
Bushwhacked in the Obamanation, but people never learn. Both sides are bought and paid for, so the Oligarchy doesn't care who wins, they always take the prize.
article doesn't mention how much was/will be paid out in campaign contributions and who they went to. That warrents at least a footnote.
I went to my bank and withdrew a bunch of cash, about $5000.00. The teller looked concerned. Then a manager came by and tried to be friendly but he seemed concerned as well, then he had the audacity to ask me what I was going to do with the cash. I told him I was going to buy a boat and sail to Jamaica, which wasn't really true, but what the hell? He went and talked to some other person, they had a little conference. Finally they gave me my money. It was my money! What's their problem?
Yep.
That's almost always the case with the megabanks. Subtle pressure to get you not to withdraw cash. If you just write a check, the money doesn't really ever leave the megabanks. They will just cook the books between the other banks and cry poor for another bailout. Nothing physical goes between those banks. Just a bunch of "1's" and "zeros" zipps into fake accounts. Buy when you take out greenbacks they panic, since they don't keep any reserves since clinton/bush deregulated the banks.
But cash is king. They absolutely hate it when I do that. Sometimes they make me stand there for twenty minutes. I have learned that every withdraw is going to be treated with suspicion. But because of that flaky treatment, I make it a point to only leave a few dollars in their bank at all times.
Whatever you do, don't answer their question about "Why do you want it?" "This is unusual" etc
My standard answer is always "because I want it." , "because I said so."
and my all time favorite:
"I read in the wall street journal that this bank may be insolvent. It must be true then?"
"should I close this account?"
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
The Bastards Never Die
By JOE BAGEANT
Go to Counterpunch for a short history of oil in the 20th century. And if you think it has nothing to do with banks and finance, I feel sorry for you.
boblecht
Are these payments "bonuses" or hush money? The banks justify the payments by saying they must keep the best talent to rebuild. I suspect they want to keep these banksters within the fold lest they become disgruntled and blow the whistle on the scams and fraud they perpetrated to make billions for the few, then pass the tab to you and me. Dons want to keep their capos in the family because they know where the bodies are buried.
Regarding Citibank--I have taken out five loans in the past 10 years. Four were originated with various Parent Plus college loan lenders. The fifth--a remortgage-- was originated at my local community bank. Since then, three of the four college loans ended up with CITI. Two years ago my mortgage--probably after being sliced and diced--ended up being serviced by CITI. I have always despised this bank because of its lack of corporate ethics. To all you "free marketers"--please explain to me how this company that I hate and would never choose to do business with ended up with four of my five outstanding loans? They have soaked me with a number of spurious charges. In spite of all this free money, they needed me to bail them out? Adding insult to injury, as a taxpayer and citizen I now own 1/3 of CITI, so hear me when I say this-- PUT THIS PREDATOR CORPORATION OUT OF BUSINESS! It is far too big to survive.
Is America Fascist yet? Government of the people by the corporations and for the corporations is NOT Democracy--it is Fascism. You can look it up in your Webster's.
Student loans are the best kind of parasitic racket for a bank, and any bank would love to get their hands on more of them, because in case of default, the gov't will pay the bank then come after the debtor, or a collection agency with the full weight and power of the gov't behind it.
Student loan debt cannot be written off in bankruptcy, and the gov't or collector can take ANY asset you have to collect on the debt - including property, bank accounts, inheritances, tax refunds, Unemployment, Pension, or Worker's Comp...even Social Security and SSI/Disability payments.
The reason for the billions in bonuses?
Because there are, what, 5 Big Banksters left?
And, between them, they have to share the very small gene pool of ruthless, conscienceless uber-greedy fellow Americans with the right skill set.
No different than, say, major league baseball - there are only so many great pitchers - and the highest bidders get them.
Plus, said uber-greedy fellow Americans need lots of bucks to help assuage the guilt they never admit to but suffer from...
The reason for the billions in bonuses?
Because they could.
Joe
Quick,
Somebody call DHS! We know where at least five Economic Terrorists are hiding right here in the USA. The number one threat to America is not a bunch of Afgans on burros, it's Domestic Banking Terrorists.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
There's a new deck of cards in Monopoly.
Out goes "get out of jail free" (habeas corpus)
In comes "bank error in THEIR favour."
And the Water Works is now the Water Board.
That's why I think this will fall through again, nobody has changed the rules they play by. Sure the banks pumped that initial taxpayer loan up multiple times by waving the magic wand.
The big executives who play this game are being rewarded for doing their magic. We will see!
TheProf has it right. When enough people feel enough pain something will give. I am concerned that before that time, the country will choose fascism and the ensuing battle will be bloody. I suppose it would in any case. The Wall Street Party will not give up without a fight.
My neighbor is almost 40 years old and when I told her the minimum wage in 1966 was $1.40/hr, gas was $.32/gallon and a house could be rented for $80/month she was shocked. It's only those of us who were around back then who know just how much we're being screwed today.
I read that the Europeans did it somewhat differently, imposing some rules on their banks, and the populace was infuriated that AIG gave bonuses to their European subsidiaries. In Europe the governments pay attention to public outrage.
Obama is not alone in this debacle. The House and Senate is still 50% conservative with all those Blue Dog "Democrats" (many formerly Republican) and throw in the moderates and it's impossible to pass progressive legislation. We need a sea change, we need to throw out both sides of the Wall Street Party and replace it with the Main Street Party. With the exception of this website, I find considerable enthusiasm for the Main Street Party with everyone I talk with, working people, small business owners and small farmers.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
JJ
while you treat the mental illness that has invaded the American mind get together with others move to an agrarian state. Learn to raise your veggies and animals. When things go pop you'll be a long way toward your own survival.
pjd412-- surely true!
The bailouts in W. European countries, vritually all of which are far more democratically governed than the US, may or may not reflect similar tendencys toward fascism/oligarchy there.
In any case, those bailouts don't in any way affect the validity of the premises one can draw about the USA's internal condition.
Why was it that the cost of health care reform needs to be paid for but the billions in bank bailouts was just added to the deficit without a peep about how it was going to be paid?
For the same reason that banks, wall street, and health care companies are linked hand in hand to supplement bottom lines. Does it make sense to rape us once with a bailout and then, in turn, apply stringent oversight to those companies who benefited at our expense to insure we are not ravaged again or to take our bailout and then give it back to us in the style of affordable healthcare? No. Best to rape us again and again as we've proven we are hardy enough to take it and then unwittingly ask for more.
risingdawn -
Thank you for your post.
Whether the US mass population suffers from a formal psychosis or from a form of clinical mass hypnosis (asuming the two disorders are technically distinguishable), I agree that it is nevertheless clearly a very mentally unhealthy populace.
Unhealthy as they are, most Americans seem either to not know, or not suspect, or in any case not care about their own un-natural passivity toward the illicit uses of power against them, as perpetrated by their political and economic ruling class.
I believe the key to restoring healthy instinctual responses to the individuals who comprise Mass-Passive America can't come simply thru US progressives fighting logistical political battles for them, in their name.
Americans must instead first become aware that they ARE dysfunctionally passive; aware of Why they have become so, and aware of How and By Whom their passivity is systematically cultivated and maintained.
Even a modest amount of mass/individual insight, here, could have a profound effect on helping Americans behave more politically reasonably in the future.
As one Jungian to another, I would welcome any ideas,suggestions, or additional perspectives you may have as to how US political progressives could better go about Psychologically educating mass Americans in these regards.
It seems evident to me that, without any such greater psychological self-insight, most Americans will continue to allow their country's present slide into fascism and mass mental illness to continue, unabated -- arguably toward a world-engulfing, ruinous outcome, much as we saw happen with the fascist Axis meta-state, led by Germany, several generations ago.
Sorry to spoil the premise of your argument, but Europe spent $4 trillion to bail out its banks.
jj's argument applies to far more than the bank bailout.
Yeah, but you see, you have to look at this from the banks' standpoint. The big execs deserve the bonuses because they were VERY successful in scamming the public and getting the banks bailed out with taxpayer money, and then turning in huge profits besides! These guys are heroes in the banking industry, where morality simply doesn't exist!
Congress could have prevented bonuses, forced the banks to help homeowners stay in their homes, and demanded an accounting of all the money by simply writing it in the legislation. They didn't because they didn't want to. Goldman CEO Paulson asked for a blank check and got it.
Every excuse or feigned outrage from OBAMA and Congress is an insult.
Congress and the President could have AT LEAST imposed a moratorium on foreclosures until people could get back on their feet.
I didn't even get a thank you note. Did you?
Joe
Over $10 billion for so few republicans (you know they are republicans) in these banks.
And the republicans want a mere $6 billion for the ENTIRE US population as start-up money for their universal "health care co-op" idea.
Does it get more glaring than this?
Ok, now... Whoever was not expecting something like this to happen please raise your hand. Anyone?
I'm usually not the nostalgic type, but every once in a while I get a hankerin' for a good old-fashioned tar & featherin' of slimy swindlers. This is one of those whiles.
As a Canadian I watched with equal horror and shock, as I did when Bush led the way to war, as the American people were being prepared for the largest financial heist in history. I thought, and almost every Canadian that I talked with thought, wow! how dumb can these people really be? I mean, they are about to be ripped off for their future and their children's future and they are going to allow it to happen? And guess what? Yes! They allowed it to happen. Unbelievable!!! I am a Jungian psychologist and I think the citizens of the US have succumbed to a mass psychosis of which the world has never seen. The Elite's know how these psychological processes occur, as this information has been adequately described in the annals of modern psychology, and they have used this science to achieve their ends: Fascist government! Goodbye freedom and prosperity and hello slavery and poverty!
But hoo boy! Are those Canucks in Toronto (and maybe the whole country) up in arms right now about the city's trash workers keeping some fringe benefits in of their new union contract! Many are calling for busting the union, and some are calling for the abolition of all unions everywhere.
The ghost of Ronald Reagan sure is stalking the land abouve the 49th - and not just in Alberta either.
Dear Rising Dawn:
If Americans are uniquely stupid, then how do you explain the fact that European governments bailed out their banks to the tune of $4 trillion?
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/apr2009/gb20090410_254738.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+inde...
Or even better: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12007
January 25, 2009
"The $700 billion US bank bailout under the Troubled Assets Relief Program, was the object of debate and legislation in the US Congress.
In contrast, in Canada, the granting of 75 billion dollars to Canada's chartered banks was implemented at the height of an election campaign, without duly informing the Canadian public.
Canada's media and financial press bears a responsibility in this regard. The matter was barely mentioned. It passed virtually unnoticed a few days before a federal election.
Media coverage was minimal. There was no parliamentary debate. No discussion, no debate as one would have expected from the opposition parties at the height of an election campaign as well as in its aftermath.
Nobody seemed to have noticed. Most Canadians do not know that there was a 75 billion dollar bailout of Canada's financial institutions."
Now that they know what they should have known...what will Canadians do about it? Apathy is not just an American sickness.
This is not a small thing that happened....
This is organized crime between bank CEO's worldwide. Bush's family is HEAVY into banking; especially the Walker side. Bush's family in the past was HEAVY into the federal reserve. He hatched it, he got away with it, and it's just never going to stop. After all, Neil Bush at Colonial and Silverado S&L's got away with the same thing in the 80's.
A repeat pattern of criminal behavior. These people are a Crime Family, and are never going to stop. Obomber is just their front man.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
ThomasJefferson... July 31st, 2009 7:45 pm...The following is a must read ....long, but mind blowing....If you cannot get them to come up, go to israelshamir.net and scroll down to these articles.
http:/www.israelshamir.net/Contributors/
Collateral_Damage_911.pdf
www.israelshamir.net/Contributors/
Collateral_Damage_Part_II_26122008.pdf
Lies are general. Truths are detailed and documented. I've never read such a backed-up, footnoted piece of research in my life. Must have been a CIA analyst's work, with a conscience is all I can think of.
The fact that is not on the original site any more, gives it even more credibility. Some of it may be wrong, but the vast complex financial web appears to be legit.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
It's only money. Yeah right!
Good ole US taxpayers, guaranteeing the bonuses of their Wall Street heroes. Oh those masters of the universe.
This will be remembered as the beginning of the end for Amerika--the rich now can await their punisment not by their fellow citizens, but by the rath of JEHOVA GOD!
I figure it'll be Zeus and Athena that finally get pissed off enough to impose a few changes. Jehovah's a wimp. Couldn't stand up to Zeus in a real knock-down drag-out. I was just partying the other evening with Dionysius, knocking back a few goblets of wine, and we were discussing just such a situation. Jehovah, though invited, never showed up. He was too busy trying to figure out which group of people to select as his chosen.
You heathen, you. ;^ ]
The unbridled Arrogance of Man...... thinking that greater forces in the Universe, if they even existed, would be at all interested in this little blue ball.....
We are completely on our own.
We have nothing to fear but religion itself.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Thank you, Obama voters
for all that change you can believe in.
the consumer society:
costs only pennies.
all of them.
Let them eat cake.
This baffles the mind how billions of tax payer money could go to these giant banks and the people get the pink slips. When Bush beat Gore in 2000 I told all my friends to prepare for a world wind of disaster, hurry into their local colleges and get a degree because things were going to get worst. Well, they ridiculed my ideas and decided not to pursue higher education and now they admit they were wrong, well too late. In 2002-2003 when Bush and most of Washington went in pursuit of an Iraqi war I tried to organize as much support on and off campus against it but everyone was too busy in their own lives to join a humanitarian cause and decided to wait out the storm, well the storm continues on with no end in sight. When Obama was running for office everyone was ecstatic while Nader warned us of his hypocrisy and betrayal but no one listened because either they were blinded by color or liberal guilt and we are stuck with a puppet. Now we are in the mist of yet another of the many turning points healthcare, financial crises and the never ending fight against a women’s right to choose and no one seems to care enough to set off a movement. Before we become a fascist country where health care is strictly for the elites, welfare only for corporations and a women’s right to choose is stripped from her we must act and do it soon because there comes a point in every situation where it will be too late to act.
pablo30 July 31st, 2009 8:57 am........I understand your points and sympathize tremendously. My question is..."If it has not happened as yet, what will it take? What will be the final straw that awakens the average American to say they have had enough?? Will it be in a news conference from the WH simply stating that we are now a fascist state and you no longer have any choices? This is a serious question. If the masses have not revolted by now, what will be the last blow to We the People. What's left?
"When Obama was running ...and we are stuck with a puppet."
Individual politicians don't matter. The US corporate state has been increasing its power for the last 30 years and they now have complete control. Revolution is coming, sometime this century, partly due to the impending disasters of climate change. You are probably young enough to see the change but I will not.
Remember the system is corrupt and cannot be changed. Change will occur from the bottom up by the development of alternative ways of living and economic organization that will in time displace the current system.
"Change will occur from the bottom up by the development of alternative ways of living and economic organization that will in time displace the current system."
I sure hope so.
The "communists" tried to impose a system of collective farms from the top down, and the farmers were not allowed to keep all of their produce, but were required to give, or sell, not sure which, to the state. Crops to be grown were specified by the state and imposed upon the populace. Obviously, this didn't work, and killed incentive.
BUT, if "collectives" or "communes" evolve from the bottom up it might be possible for small groups to own land in common and become self-sufficient subsistence farmers. Its just a vague idea at the moment, in my poor old mind, but all it means is neighbors getting to know one another and working together for their own good, their own sustenance. Any given group might be composed of a carpenter, an electrician, a plumber, a farmer, a teacher, a mechanic, some more or less unskilled people, all working the land together and helping each other out on home repairs, etc. Whatever happens, the current paradigm is at the edge of a cliff and I think there ain't no turnin' back at this point.
"The kids" tried communes in the 60's and 70's but it didn't work because they were too young, and though full of idealism, didn't have the "capital" to really make it work. Living in yurts, no plumbing, raising goats? Nahhhh... no thanks. But some early middle-aged to aged people with some resources might be able to make a go of it. For example, I "own" a small townhouse that I might be able to sell to come up with the funds to invest in some land and buildings, pooled with a few other people in the same situation, might result in a workable, sustainable, subsistence living situation. Grow your own, and roll your own!!
I've been pondering the idea of trying to get together a group of people to pool resources to buy a "McMansion". Six bedrooms, six people or couples investing in a place to live and work. Whatever. Maybe its a scatterbrained idea. I don't know. SOMETHING has got to GIVE soon, though. "If it keeps on rainin' the levee's goin' to break".
(High water risin')
"you find the things you have the hardest time partin' with -
are the things you need the least."
Our Czar at work! Business as usual. I'm so glad they were too big to fail.
I simply LUV all of Barry's Czars -- the most of any president ever (36+)! And unlike cabinet positions, most Czars aren't subject to Congressional confirmation or oversight. It's a further erosion of accountability and transparency. As Senator Collins asked, "Who's in charge of health care? Is it the secretary of Health and Human Services? Or is the White House czar? Who is in charge of environmental and energy issues?"
Can you say "one term president" ?