Common Dreams NewsCenter

Summer Reading

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Bush’s Public Lands Legacy Is A Sad Sight To Behold

by Timothy Egan

MOUNT HOOD, Ore. — Most Americans don’t own a summer home on Cape Cod, or a McMansion in the Rockies, but they have this birthright: an area more than four times the size of France. If you’re a citizen, you own it — about 565 million acres.

The deed on a big part of this public land inheritance dates to a pair of Republican class warriors from a hundred years ago: President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot, first chief of the Forest Service.

Both were rich. Both were well educated. Both were headstrong and quirky. Pinchot slept on a wooden pillow and had his valet wake him with ice water to the face. Teddy and G.P., as they were known, sometimes wrestled with each other, or swam naked in the Potomac.

In establishing the people’s estate, they fought Gilded Age titans — railroads, timber barons, mine owners — and their enablers in the Senate. And make no mistake: Those acts may have been cast as the founding deeds of the environmental movement, but they were as much about class as conservation.

Pinchot had studied forestry in France, where a peasant couldn’t make a campfire without being subject to penalties. In England, he had seen how the lords of privilege had their way over the outdoors. In the United States, he and T.R. envisioned the ultimate expression of Progressive-era values: a place where a tired factory hand could be renewed — lord for a day.

“In the national forests, big money was not king,” wrote Pinchot. The Forest Service was beloved, he said, because “it stood up for the honest small man and fought the predatory big man as no government bureau had done before.”

A century later, I drove through the Gifford Pinchot National Forest on my way to climb Mount Hood, and found the place in tatters. Roads are closed, or in disrepair. Trails are washed out. The campgrounds, those that are open, are frayed and unkempt. It looks like the forestry equivalent of a neighborhood crack house.

In the Pinchot woods, you see the George W. Bush public lands legacy. If you want to drill, or cut trees, or open a gas line — the place is yours. Most everything else has been trashed or left to bleed to death.

Remember the scene from “It’s a Wonderful Life,” when Jimmy Stewart’s character sees what would happen to Bedford Falls if the richest man in town took over? All those honky-tonks, strip joints and tenement dwellings in Pottersville?

If Roosevelt roamed the West today, he’d find some of the same thing in the land he entrusted to future presidents. The national wildlife system, started by T.R., has been emasculated. President Bush has systematically pared the budget to the point where, this year, more than 200 refuges could be without any staff at all.

The Bureau of Land Management, which oversees some of the finest open range, desert canyons and high-alpine valleys in the world, was told early on in the Bush years to make drilling for oil and gas their top priority. A demoralized staff has followed through, but many describe their jobs the way a cowboy talks about having to shoot his horse.

In Colorado, the bureau just gave the green light to industrial development on the aspen-forested high mountain paradise called the Roan Plateau. In typical fashion, the administration made a charade of listening to the public about what to do with the land. More than 75,000 people wrote them — 98 percent opposed to drilling.

For most of the Bush years, the Interior Department was nominally run by a Stepford secretary, Gale Norton, while industry insiders such as J. Steven Griles — the former coal lobbyist who pleaded guilty this year to obstruction of justice — ran the department.

Same in the Forest Service, where an ex-timber industry insider, Mark Rey, guides administration policy.

They don’t take care of those lands because they see them as one thing: a cash-out. Thus, in Bush’s budget proposal this year, he guts the Forest Service budget yet again, while floating the idea of selling thousands of acres to the highest bidder. The administration says it wants more money for national parks. But the parks are $10 billion behind on needed repairs; the proposal is a pittance.

Roosevelt had his place on Oyster Bay. Pinchot had a family estate in Pennsylvania. Bush has the ranch in Crawford. Only one of them has never been able to see beyond the front porch.

Timothy Egan, a former Seattle correspondent for The New York Times and the author of “The Worst Hard Time,” is a guest columnist.

© The Seattle Post-Intelligencer

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

5 Comments so far

  1. hayduke1 June 27th, 2007 12:11 pm

    I suggest that all the greed-driven capitalists be required to pay for a sanctuary for all the human and other animals who don’t buy into this consumption-over-all culture; after all they are using public natural resources to line their pockets. Morality, ethics and basic fairness require that their windfall be distributed like the resources.

  2. ezeflyer June 27th, 2007 1:11 pm

    CHAIN THE CORPORATE BEAST!!!

    http://www.gp.org/

  3. wcdevins June 27th, 2007 5:24 pm

    Maybe BushCo could hire that foreign firm (Irish, I think it was) that was gonna build a water park in Baghdad after Saddam was deposed. I understand its 2006 opening has been pushed back due to unforseen circumstances, so the firm could probably find the time to fix up some of our National Parks and Forests at a bargain price!

    Seriously, aside from the fascisizing of the supreme court, the destruction of the environment on his watch will provide the bitterest of Bush’s lasting legacies. We’re all under the heel of consumer corporate capitalist fascism, and there’s no way out.

  4. armchair June 29th, 2007 6:56 pm

    hahahaha. bush killed the environmental movement by being the “war president”. what environmental movement? who is standing to protect it all now? fragmented we stand against exploitative corruption in a war president’s world. sustained forest management is in sync with community based forest practice, rampant extraction is against long-term sustainability, from fisheries to forestry. this administration, however, hasnt thought it through that far. guess they must jus b punk arse botches serving monied masters. rivers will stand on their own only because we were busied by a lie. war.

  5. NMBill June 30th, 2007 2:18 pm

    Oh yes! In wartime say good-bye to little things like YOUR public lands and your right to protect them. Many forests are charging to park and hike in your land. This is to lead you to believe that it’s a privilege to access your land instead of your right to. This “use fee” was started under Clinton and is meant to start a president where your right of land use is challenged!

    Your compassion for nature is what the machine is trying to destroy! I have seen many peoples attitude change when they get away from civilization. THE ENVIRONMENT WE EVOLVED IN has an interaction with our psyche that is timeless.

    This is what Pinchot, Roosevelt, Muir and thousands of others wanted to preserve for us in the face of the industrial revolution. It wasn’t easy back then and they had to compromise with industry, and that compromise had been the battleground since.

    On one side, wilderness is more valuable today because there is less of it. On the other side the “world money supply” has grown so large that it wants to consume all available resources just to avoid collapse.

    We have 565 million acres around the country that are being fought over and in the fight I hope that we are not intimidated by rhetoric criticizing our love for an environment in its natural state. We can be made to feel like such weenies for defending the birds, bees, flowers and trees.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org