Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A New Deal for Local Economies
More local, durable economies are already taking root. We can help them along by changing the way we regulate businesses, plan cities, and finance the communities we want.
Let me begin by sharing some good news. Scattered here and there, in my country and in yours, the seeds of a new, more local, and more durable economy are taking root.
The Power of Local
Locally grown food has soared in popularity. There are now 5,274 active farmers markets in the United States. Remarkably, almost one of every two of these markets was started within the last decade. Food co-ops and neighborhood greengrocers are likewise on the rise.
Some 400 new independent bookstores have opened in the last four years. Neighborhood hardware stores are making a comeback in some cities. Most students graduating from pharmacy school report that they would rather open their own drugstore than work for chain. Last April, even as Virgin Megastores prepared to shutter its last U.S. record emporium, more than a thousand independent music stores were mobbed for the second annual Record Store Day, a celebration of independent record stores that drew hundreds of thousands of people into local stores, became one of the top search terms on Google, and triggered a 16-point upswing in album sales.
Driving is down in U.S. over the last two years, while data from a dozen metropolitan regions show that houses located within walking distance of local businesses have held value better than those isolated in the suburbs, where the nearest gallon of milk is a five-mile drive to a superstore.
In city after city, independent businesses are organizing and building an increasingly powerful counterweight to the big business lobby on issues as varied as tax policy and global warming. Local business alliances have now formed in over 130 cities and collectively count some 30,000 businesses as members. These alliances are calling on people to choose independent businesses and locally produced goods more often, making a compelling case that doing so is critical to rebuilding middle-class prosperity, averting environmental catastrophe, and ensuring that our daily lives are not smothered by corporate uniformity.
And there is growing evidence that these initiatives are succeeding. During the 2009's slow holiday season, a nationwide survey by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance found that independent businesses actually outperformed chain competitors. What accounted for this relative good fortune? Many of those surveyed said that more people are deliberately seeking out locally owned businesses.
But here's what is perhaps the strongest—and, undoubtedly, the most bizarre—evidence to date that people's priorities are changing: Many massive, globe-spanning corporations are now trying to figure out how they can be "local" too.
Hellmann's, the mayonnaise brand owned by the processed-food giant Unilever, is test-driving a new "Eat Real, Eat Local" marketing campaign. Frito-Lay is using farmers to pitch its potato chips as local food. Barnes & Noble, the world's top seller of books, has launched a new campaign under the tagline, "All bookselling is local." Winn-Dixie, one of the largest supermarket chains in the U.S., has a new slogan: "Local flavor since 1956." The International Council of Shopping Centers, a global consortium of mall developers, is pouring millions of dollars into television ads urging people to "Shop Local"—at their nearest mall.
Most astounding of all, Starbucks, a company that has spent untold millions developing one of the most recognizable brands on the planet, is now beginning to un-brand some of its outlets. The first of these reopened as "15th Avenue Coffee and Tea" in Seattle. Unless you read the fine print on the menu, you would quite easily assume it was an independent coffee house.
Corporations desperately want to turn the local economy movement into nothing more than a cheap marketing trick they can appropriate for their own ends. These attempts at imitation are unnerving. But in the end I think this new variation on corporate green-washing—let's call it local-washing—will backfire. In the meantime, I'm heartened by what it says about the current consciousness. After all, these companies spend enormous sums on market research—they would not be doing this unless they had detected a sizeable shift in public attitudes.
Changing the Rules
While signs abound that people are rediscovering the benefits of an economy rooted in community and small-scale enterprise, all of this activity, though widespread, is still quite modest. It exists largely on the margins and is unlikely to coalesce into a wholesale reorganization of our economy unless we change the rules.
About ten years ago, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance launched the New Rules Project to develop and advocate for policies that would democratize ownership, refashion the economy for long-term sustainability, and nurture strong, self-conscious, and self-governing communities. To get the economy we want, I believe that three areas of policy reform are especially critical.
Resilience depends on diversity, but banks and businesses just keep getting bigger. We need regulations that create real competition.
Our city planning policies promote megastores and urban sprawl rather then healthy, local economies. We can reshape those policies to support neighborhood businesses that slow the pace of life and encourage people to get to know each other.
Reconnecting Capital with Community
Our investments tend to fund consolidation and speculation. But new models are emerging that allow us to finance the economy we really want.
- Posted in

Breaking the Curse of Bigness
Planning for Local Economies
8 Comments so far
Show AllI have commented before on the economics of localization but the more I learn the more complicated it gets, and not in a good way (if complexity can ever be considered good). I have heard that JMG addresses this issue to some degree and for that I applaud him although I have also heard this highly detrimental issue get a wave of the hand dismissal by simply stating that "success just depends on careful timing" Pfffissst!
I have many friends who are market farmers. Hardest working folks I know and I do everything I can to support them. There is a dynamic that happens every year where later in the season more and more people talk about how their own squash, peppers, carrots, etc. are growing gangbusters, or ask them how they can make their own veggies grow better. They don't seem to realize they are talking to a person who is trying to sell them those very same items. Its like at craft fairs when people come up to vendors and say "how do you make those" or they look at it and say "I could make that".
Now the farmers still sell OK but they do see a drop off of biz at that point. When the economy really started to tank and there were constant murmurings of layoffs, sales at the farmers market fell off big time and people went out of their way to shop for bargains.
PO means ever decreasing purchasing power for the vast majority of the population, HELLO????
This dynamic is now and the future.
Those who think that farmers markets will eventually faze out supermarkets or that supermarkets will gradually decline and farmers markets will pick up the slack, are most likely wrong. And we should hope that this is so. Even if a local farmers market ramped up 10 times the production, which is massively challenging, they would still only be feeding around 10 or maybe 20% of the population. What's the other 80% going to do for food?
Supermarkets will change significantly for sure but they will always represent the most cost effective way to feed the population.
Instead of dreaming of some fantasy future where we all shop at the renaissance fair like market in the oak grove, you would perhaps best serve your community by producing local processed food for your local Safeway.
The "renaissance fair like market in the oak grove" scenario would only be possible after massive dieoff in the very near future and I would posit that if we start down that road (The Road) few will be crawling out of the other end of the bottleneck.
By the way I just talked about local food production but the dynamics of the economics of localization applies to everything.
Thank you Stacey for the reminder on why going local matters. We would have a bigger local comeback if only capitalism could be done away with. Here in WI, it took rising unemployments for 5 years to get people to think locally and act locally. Without capitalism, corporations can't bully local businesses.
great, all this is great. but to juxtapose this as some 'alternative'?
as corporations and raping imperialistic gov'ts are doing so much damage every day, that this will be an 'alternative'.
the greens 'greenwash' their own good acts.
It will not save the planet. And certainly does NOT help all the sustainable farmers that our govt is killing every day...and funding dictatorships over the world who kill any farmers doing coops and land grabs (colombia for one example) AND funding and aiding by military, the world bank and IMF and etc...to stop any and ALL land and freedom movements.
americans wake up.
stop thinking and moralizing about your backyard.
stop your govt.
and the only way to do that is by mass bottom up social movements...not emailing, or voting.....
revolution.
can all you greens say that? are you all cowards....or upper class?
you HAVE to stop capitalism...and for environmental 'activists' in the USA...in the worst belly of the worst criminal not to recognize that is sheer folly.
the USA military alone is one of the sole destructive forces on the planet.
my god.
tommys: In terms of saving the planet, I'm not sure, at this point, that anything can. But change happens in many ways and this is one of them. Stopping our gov't will partly happen if financial support for large corporate entities starts drying up. Changing corporate taxes to a flat tax on gross revenue and exempting the first $50-100 million would be a great boon to these local businesses who would be exempt from federal taxes and capable of competing on price.
Yes the US military is destructive, and challenging it with weapons will not be very effective and will, at the very least, result in civil war. If with one hand we cut off federal power and with the other build local and regional systems we have the best chance.
On this Sunday in my town, the superstores were full of shoppers, the small businesses empty. People still decide where they will buy by the price of goods, not by concerns for small businesspeople. Partly that is due to economics--so many of them cannot afford to pay more, but it is also driven by ignorance: they don't know that every dollar they spend at those places leaves the community and, except for the scant wages paid to staff, will never return. We have a lot of educating to do. Let's get busy.
Good article but I was a little surprised to see no mention of local currency systems. Hours, LETS and Timebanks can and do make a big difference in communities where they exist. They not only increase local spending power, they also incentivize local production.
A little late here I know but this is exactly how the New Deal started, from local to national. Some people will believe in stupid heroism worshiping but I prefer going local and cooperation along with it. Take it from me, bottom up beats top down any day.