Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
GOP: Use Unspent Stimulus For War
As some Democrats consider raising taxes to pay for President Obama's escalation of the now-eight-year-old war in Afghanistan, the opposition party has a suggestion.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., left, accompanied by Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington,Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009. McConnell told his colleagues during a closed-door GOP lunch Tuesday that the best way to fund the war would be to use unspent stimulus funds. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told his colleagues
during a closed-door GOP lunch Tuesday that the best way to fund the
war would be to use unspent stimulus funds, according to Sen. Lamar
Alexander (R-Tenn.), the third-ranking Republican.
McConnell, at a press briefing with reporters following the meeting, repeated the idea -- only after making sure to share the blame with Democrats for not paying for previous wars.
"Well, I think ideally it would be better to pay for the war than not. As you know, in previous years both sides agreed not to," said McConnell (though the GOP controlled Congress through 2006 and the White House through 2008, leaving Democrats little opportunity to fund a war).
"We know the stimulus failed. It was sold to the Congress and to the American people with the suggestion that it would hold unemployment below 8 percent. We know unemployment is over 10 percent," said McConnell. "If we're looking for a way to fund several years of the war I would suggest unexpended stimulus funds would be a good place to start."
McConnell is heading to the White House Tuesday afternoon for a meeting with Obama in advance of the president's speech announcing the escalation of 34,000 troops, which comes on top of a recent 20,000-strong escalation, bringing the total number of troops north of 100,000.
On Monday, the Congressional Budget Office released a study finding that only about a quarter of the stimulus funds have been spent so far.
Regardless of how the war is paid for, the Senate will need to pass
a supplemental war spending measure at some point next year, said Sen.
Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, on
Tuesday.
The supplemental could come at a tough time for Democrats seeking
reelection in 2010, as the Democratic base clamors for an end to the
war amid widespread concern that the overseas effort is sucking up
money needed for the economic recovery at home.
In addition, the Afghan government propped up by the U.S. is mired in corruption and is widely perceived to have stolen the recent election. "It's controversial anytime you send troops to a foreign country, particularly one where there's been such poor governance in the country," said Levin. "You've got such evidence of corruption, which is continuing."
Democrats in Congress generally reacted coolly to Obama's troop escalation, but said that they would wait to hear his speech before drawing conclusions.
Various proposals to fund the war, from war bonds to a surtax on the wealthy, have been floated. GOP senators roundly rejected the surtax suggestion, as did one bellwether of elite opinion in the capital: the Washington Post editorial board. In a characteristically flawed editorial, the Post dismissed a surtax "since the House already has voted to tax high incomes to pay for health care, and raising the income taxes of middle-class families makes little sense when the nation is struggling to recover from a recession."
The Post knows -- or ought to know -- that the House tax on the wealthy is not in the Senate health care bill and that it is extremely unlikely to be included in the final measure. And the surtax would not, in fact, hit "middle-class families," but rather the wealthy.
Opposition to such a tax, however, means that only a fee on the wealthiest Americans has a chance of getting through, said Levin.
"I don't think any tax increase in the middle of a recession -- except a tax on the upper income bracket which has done so very, very well, even in the middle of the recession -- is going to happen," he said.
- Posted in



14 Comments so far
Show AllMore crazy ideas from Mitch McConnell!!!!
How about paying for it with Congressmen's salaries and health care, and Wall Street bonuses?
Whooo, I have an idea(for a change!)A real war tax on the American people to pay for this Afgan thing. We must pay ahead for this not later!!!
How about ending all wars.
How about putting a 10% tax on all the monies poured into the congressional members' coffers from the healthcare industry and big business? That might just pay for all the war spending since 2003 and beyond. Bet that would bring in a lot from McConnell's purse alone.
OR, since Cheney got the filthy rich their big tax breaks at the same time as he got the country lied into invading Iraq, why not take back at least half of those tax breaks to clean up the messes left over there by Cheney/Bush?
Don't stop at half, confiscate 150% of the war profiteers money.
Both parties are wrong. The money doesn't really exist once you factor in the borrowing nature of government.
Jason Jordan
Sandpoint, Idaho
1. A sales tax on all stock market sales.
2. A ten per cent income tax on the profits of stock market sales.
3. Remove the salary cap on social security and medicare taxes.
4. Progressive tax rate , starting at twenty per cent on income of $300,00 a year, twenty five per cent on $500,000 a year, forty percent on $1,000,000 a year, and so on.
5. Tax capital gains as taxable income.
6. Tax golden parachutes and all included benefits as taxable income. ( See number 4. )
7. Limit all military and government pensions to $100,000 a year.
8. Cancel annual pay raises of congress people who vote for war as long as war endures.
9. Cancel annual pay raises of congress people who vote to increase national debt.
10. All of the above.
11. I like the way you think!
Mitch: Fuck you Dickhead
Along with the "leftover funds" send these pigs and sons of pigs to Afghanistan to do their stint at the pointy end of things.
"Sold to the Congress"....? That would be more like 'Congress paid for by K street.
Mitch looks like he might be in need of a little 'stimulus' himself. :D
I think that the members of Congress, and members of the administration, who support the war should be required to sell their organs to pay for the war debts. They must keep on selling organs until the war debt is paid off or until they have no organs left.
"On Monday, the Congressional Budget Office released a study finding that only about a quarter of the stimulus funds have been spent so far."
What the hell are they waiting for?