Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Blood and Guts: Pakistan’s ‘Gutsiest’ Woman

by Declan Walsh

Lunchtime yesterday, and a gaggle of lawyers in black suits crammed into a small room in the sweaty bowels of Pakistan’s Supreme Court. Balancing cigarettes and cups of tea, they savored the moment. An epic struggle was nearing its climax. The court was about to deliver its verdict on a battle that has captivated Pakistan since March, between the President, General Pervez Musharraf, and the chief justice, Muhammad Iftikhar Chaudhry. The country had never seen it before: a civilian openly challenging a military leader. After months of raucous protest, the lawyers smelled victory. But one was not sure.

0721 08Asma Jahangir, an eagle-eyed lawyer on the frontline of the chief justice’s campaign, was apprehensive. “I don’t know, I just don’t know,” she says, her voice trailing away. “I could be surprised, but it looks like there’s going to be a compromise.” We sat down to lunch, a few discs of unleavened bread and a scoop of dhal.

At five feet tall, Jahangir, 55, is not an imposing figure, but for almost four decades she has towered over Pakistan’s human rights war. She has championed battered wives, rescued teenagers from death row, defended people accused of blasphemy, and sought justice for the victims of honor killings. These battles have won her admirers and enemies in great number. But she doesn’t care, mocking the mullahs and poking a finger in the face of the barrel-chested generals. In conversations with friends, one word constantly recurs: guts. “Asma is the gutsiest woman that Pakistan has,” says Abbas Nasir, editor of Dawn newspaper and a friend. “Whatever she believes in, she has the conviction to say it publicly in a sea of complete intolerance and ignorance. In a country like this, that is fantastic.”

News of her courage is spreading abroad. Four years ago Time magazine declared her an “Asian hero”; this week’s New Yorker called her Pakistan’s answer to Burma’s Aung San Suu Kyi. But what matters to Jahangir is what people in Pakistan think. And for them she is just one thing: the woman to call when in trouble. In February, in the port city of Karachi, I met one of those she has saved. Abid Zaidi, a Shia student falsely accused of involvement in a bombing, had been abducted by the intelligence agencies, illegally imprisoned for months and ruthlessly tortured. Word reached Jahangir that he was missing. One day, Zaidi told me, an army officer stood over him in a dirty cell in Lahore, interrogating and berating him. Then he asked a question: “What the hell do you have to do with Asma Jahangir?” A few days later, Zaidi was free.

Jahangir says many others have “disappeared” in Pakistan since 2001. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, a collective of lawyers and activists that she helped found in 1986, has recorded hundreds of cases. For her, it is a symptom of the moral corruption of the military dictatorship under General Musharraf, funded and encouraged by his great ally in the “war on terror”, the United States. But now, as various crises explode across the country, the house of cards is starting to burn. “The military is not a solution, it’s a problem - particularly under Musharraf,” she says. “If your people don’t really believe or respect you, if you don’t have the moral authority to rule, then your goose is cooked. He’s trying and his foreign allies are helping him. But there is a big disconnect between him and the people. And that’s a very serious problem.”

Certainly, Pakistan is entering perilous waters. The siege of the Red Mosque this month turned a corner of the capital, Islamabad, into a war zone. More than 100 people died. Since then Islamist extremists have unleashed a wave of suicide bombs across the country - three on Thursday alone, in which 50 people died. General Musharraf has appealed for unity, something his followers say bleeding-heart liberals such as Jahangir can never achieve in a complex, conflicted country such as Pakistan. The minister of state for information, Tariq Azim Khan, says: “She’s a great campaigner but has lost credibility because of her involvement in opposition circles. People like her should keep themselves away from politics.”

But Jahangir cannot turn away from injustice. Over lunch she broke off the conversation to catch the ear of a passing clerk. “You know I’ve been coming here for years yet we still don’t have a women’s toilet,” she admonishes softly. The man spluttered an explanation in Urdu; she cut him off: “I’ve had to use the men’s toilet, you know.” The man skulked away.

Being a gadfly is in Jahangir’s blood. Her father, Malik Jilani, was a civil servant who resigned in protest after Pakistan’s first military coup, in 1958. He entered leftwing, liberal politics, guaranteeing himself countless spells in jail. As a teenager, Jahangir remembers, intelligence men in ill-fitting suits would wait in cars outside the family home in Lahore. When she was 13, the violence came to her door. A journalist and a politician were shot outside her house. One died; Jahangir helped take the other to hospital. “We saw the trail of blood running into the room. That was the first time I saw human bloodshed,” she says.

Jahangir launched her own rebellion in 1969 with a women’s march to the residence of the governor of Punjab. She trained as a lawyer and in 1980 set up Pakistan’s first all-female legal firm with her younger sister Hina and two others. The fundamentalist military dictator General Muhammad Zia Ul Haq had seized power; there was plenty of work for the idealists. Jailed for leading protests against the Hudood ordinances, a harsh set of laws that, among other grotesqueries, denied justice to rape victims, Jahangir befriended a blind woman who had been raped then convicted of “adultery”. Since then, she says, she has rarely been able to say “no”. “What else can you do? Otherwise you just have to pack up and go home,” she says. “But I didn’t think women’s issues would turn out to be so dangerous - that you take on the case of a 20-year-old who wants to marry, then you have people coming into court trying to kill you.”

Unsurprisingly, it’s been a dangerous journey. In 1999 a gunman burst into Jahangir’s offices and shot dead Samia Imran, a battered wife seeking a divorce. One of the bullets missed her sister Hina by a couple of feet. Some years back a gang of assassins broke into Jahangir’s house, but were detected and scared away. Jahangir later discovered they came from a sectarian militant outfit called Sunni Tehrik, but she believes the orders were given by the government. She sent her children, who are now grown up, to boarding school in England after their lives were threatened by militants. “They were very young at the time,” she says, pointing across the table at her daughter, now a journalist. “I just couldn’t take the tension of them being there.”

Slavery-like conditions, honor killings, horrible disfigurements - why does so much bad news come out of Pakistan? “Look, crime takes place in every country,” she says. “But it becomes abuse when the state is unwilling and unable to protect the life and honor of its citizens. That is the shocking part of it, and under Musharraf it has got much worse.” In corners of Punjab or Sindh, she says, powerful feudal landlords, police chiefs and judges run their personal mafias. “It’s very frustrating,” she says with a sigh.

There have been victories along the way. This year the Hudood ordinances were repealed, although pressure from religious parties ensured many restrictions remained. Thanks to pressure from the HRCP and other groups, hundreds of “disappeared” people have been freed or accounted for. A list of more than 400 names has been whittled down to 97, she says.

But few victories can have been as sweet as that of yesterday afternoon, a few hours after our interview, when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the chief justice. General Musharraf’s case against him was “illegal”; Mr Chaudhry should be immediately reinstated.

In the courtroom, lawyers punched the air and hugged each other. Some wept. Jahangir beamed like the sun, swept along in a great wave of people that poured out of the courthouse. For once, words escaped her. “Unbelievable. Unbelievable,” she cries, struggling to keep her feet. “I’m just speechless. Speechless.”

A throng of cameras waited outside. “This is one of the high points of the past 30 years,” she says. “People had started to give up. They thought the military was invincible, that nobody could stand up to them. Well, now people have stood up to them, while upholding the rule of law. Today I am a very proud Pakistani.”

© Guardian News and Media Limited 2007

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

9 Comments so far

  1. ron murry July 21st, 2007 2:14 pm

    what is happing there will be coming to America soon by way of the Bush crime famly.

  2. bobh July 21st, 2007 3:09 pm

    I believe that it’s already been happening, Ron. Nevertheless I’m still hopeful that there are enough of us who still seek justice that an exemplar of freedom like Asma Jahangir will spring up from our midst and lead the resistance to imperialism in the U.S.

  3. valjean July 21st, 2007 5:52 pm

    Would that it be true. Mandela, daw aung san sui kyi, dennis kucinich, jean valjean…could happen.

  4. gyptian July 21st, 2007 8:19 pm

    Asma Jahangir has always been in the forefront of the fight for basic civil liberties in Pakistan. She is carrying on a long tradition of women in the subcontinent who stand up to power. Her struggle is particularly poignant as she is up against the mullahs ( the bearded ones) and the generals (mush and co) as opposed to her Indian counterparts who operate within a democracy. She needs to be supported to the fullest.

  5. jungleboy July 21st, 2007 8:46 pm

    Long live the defenders of the people! Angels from heaven!

    You go Ron! If a case can be made out of country, then it can make its way back here. The Hague should make more public, its cases. Maybe then Truth might be heard. I heard that a number of our politicians are wanted elsewhere.

  6. kathyodat July 22nd, 2007 2:01 am

    yeah, well the Pakistani Supreme Court ruled in their favor. Can you see our Supreme Court (stacked with Bush unitary executive supporters - thank you Democrats!) doing that? I can’t.

    At least we will have a chance to see when Bush’s defiance of Congress gets there if this country is ruled by law or by Bush.

  7. gyptian July 22nd, 2007 2:27 am

    Wow .. this has got to be a new low … our point of reference now is pakistan … also the pakistanis are on the street protesting the dicktator while we sit on our pathetic asses and whine …

  8. neoconned July 22nd, 2007 12:04 pm

    “Look, crime takes place in every country,” she says. “But it becomes abuse when the state is unwilling and unable to protect the life and honor of its citizens.”

    Unlike Pakistan, America has no Asma Jahangir. The Sheeple will fall into line and subject themselves to whatever dictatorship Bush invokes under the catch all phrase “national Security”.

    Kathyodat - we had our day in 2000 well BEFORE the Bush appointees Alito and Roberts took seat on the Bench.

    Gore v. Bush 2000 -
    US Supreme Court overreaches its own Constitutional authority and intervenes in a FL State Supreme Court case. The ruling which was important for Americans to notice was missed. Everyone (including myself) was caught up in who won the election. The reality was that the Supreme Court intervened to prevent exposing just how the Electoral College works. It was in the ruling for all to see, but few read it and the media of course never once mentioned it. “The citizens of FL do NOT have a Constitutional guarantee to vote for Presidential Electors.” Sadly this is perfectly legal and so the FL State legislature would have been operating under the Electoral College rules by holding a special session to declare who the States Electoral votes would go to. They could have chosen Mickey Mouse, the home town candidate if they wanted and it would be perfectly legal. The Electoral College works without our votes and we technically do not get to vote for Presidential Electors, those folks are chosen by the State Legislatures and ARE the Electoral College. But the Electorla College and how it actually functions was not exposed in 2000 thereby preventing the people from becoming aware they have no real vote for President.

    One more…

    Mineta v. Alexander 2000 -
    Once again the US Supreme Court outlined on paper that DC citizens do NOT have a COnstitutional guarantee to have representation in Congress. This is because they do not live in a State, but in a Federal City or District. Every one I tell this to simply says,’yeah, it is not a State”. But I ask you where does the Federal jurisdiction stop? Remember eminent domain? What about people living in National Forest’s? This could be a precursor to further diminshment of voting rights and representation for many more people in the future. Didn’t we have a Revolt in 1776 against the King of England essentially sueing for taxation with representation? I contend that we have already lost our rights well before the Bush appointees came to the Kangaroo Court. We have a long uphill climb to get to where Pakistan is at now… that is what is truly sad.

  9. Natalia July 22nd, 2007 3:10 pm

    Impossible for US to have an Asma Jehangir. First, everyone in the US is spineless (as someone said above: the Pakistanis are on the streets, protesting). Second, Asma Jehangir believes deeply in what she is doing, selflessly, for the benefit of OTHERS. Can ANY USan be described in this way? Not likely. USans are selfish and narcissistic.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org