EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Turkey: The Mideast's Real Revolution
The revolutions and uprising that have been sweeping across the Mideast are widely believed to have begun in Tunisia. In fact, the first seeds of revolution were planted in 2002 in Turkey, as its Justice and Development Party began the long, arduous battle against disguised military dictatorship.
Turkey’s popular prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has turned Turkey into the Mideast’s role model for successful democracy.To understand how important last week’s Turkish elections were, step back for a moment to 1960 when I was in high school in Switzerland.
A Turkish classmate named Turgut told me, tears in his eyes, “The generals hanged my daddy!” His father had been a cabinet minister.
The 510,000-man Turkish armed forces, NATO’s second biggest after the US, have mounted four military coups since 1950. Turkey’s current constitution was written by the military after its 1980 coup.
Ever since the era of national hero turned strongman, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey has been run by its powerful military behind a thin façade of squabbling politicians. In the process, it suffered widescale political violence, Kurdish secessionism, rigged elections, and endless financial crises.
Americans always liked to point to pre-2002 as the ideal Muslim state. “Why can’t those Arabs be more like the sensible Turks?” was a refrain often heard in Washington. Its proponents chose to ignore, or simply failed to see, that Turkey was an iron-fisted military dictatorship.
Turkey began to change in 2002 when the new Justice and Development Party (AKP) won an electoral victory. The shift from the traditional left and rightist Kemalist parties was due to a major demographic shift. Rural and middle class Turks began moving into the cities, diluting the political and economic power of the minority secular elite: the military, big business, media, academia, and judiciary.
Turkey’s tame Muslim religious establishment was kept under tight security control. Under Ataturk and his successors, Islam, the bedrock of Turkish culture and ethos, was savagely attacked, nearly destroyed and brought under state control – just as the Russian Orthodox Church was during Stalin’s era.
What Turks called “the deep government” – hard rightists, security organizations, gangsters, the rich elite, and rabid nationalists -wielded power and crushed dissenters.
AK called for Islamic political principles: welfare for the poor and old, fighting corruption, responsive, ethical political leaders, good relations with neighbors. Turkey’s right and its military allies screamed that their nation was about to fall to Iranian-style Islamists, or torn apart by Kurdish rebels.
In fact, AK’s decade of rule has given Turkey its longest period of human rights, stunning economic growth, financial stability, and democratic government.
Under AK, Turkey has moved closer to the European Union’s legal norms than, for example, new members Bulgaria and Rumania. But France and Germany’s conservatives insist Turkey will never be accepted in the EU. Europe – particularly its farmers – don’t want 75 million mostly Muslim Turks.
Largely unseen by outsiders, AK has relentlessly pushed Turkey’s reactionary military back to its barracks. This long struggle culminated in attempts by the military, known as the Ergenekon affaire, to again overthrow the civilian government.
The plot was broken: numbers of high-raking officers were arrested and put on trial. So were journalists and media figures involved in the plot – probably too many. Investigators are examining questionable arms deals between Turkey’s military and Israel.
Ergenekon broke the power of Turkey’s generals, who were closely allied to the US military establishment and Israel’s Likud party. In fact, the Pentagon often had more influence over Turkey than its civilian leaders. Until AK, the US nurtured bitter Turkish hostility to Iran, Syria, Hezbullah, Hamas, and, at times, Iraq, and an artificial friendship with Israel.
Today, all has changed. Turkey’s popular prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, backed by a majority of voters, has turned Turkey into the Mideast’s role model for successful democracy, and unleashed the latent economic power of this nation of 75 million.
Turkey’s capable foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, engineered a “zero problems” policy that vastly improved Turkey’s relations with all its formerly hostile neighbors, excepting Armenia and Greek-Cyprus. Turkey’s foreign policy now reflects Turkish rather than US and Israeli interests.
“Zero problems’ opened the Mideast’s doors to Turkish business, restoring Turkey to the former dominant regional leadership it held before World War I.
Turkey’s popular support for the Palestinians led to a bitter clash with Israel. As a result, Turkey has become the target of fierce attacks by the US Congress and media for no longer favoring Israeli interests. The Wall Street Journal, the North American mouthpiece of Israel’s hard right, has led the attacks against Turkey.
Claims by the right that Erdogn is turning Turkey into an Islamic dictatorship are false. The stable, democratic, productive Turkey he is building is a boon for all concerned. Istanbul used to be the Paris of the Muslim world. It’s returning to that role again.
Erdogan’s third electoral victory fell short of allowing him to rewrite the obsolete constitution without consensus from other parties, but it means years more democratic and economic progress for this vitally important nation that will play a key role in stabilizing and building a new, modern Mideast.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


11 Comments so far
Show AllFinally! An honest assessment of Erdogan and the AK as a force for good in the region. All the rubbish that has been published in the US and Israel about Turkey and its supposed return to Ottoman imperialism and all the scare-mongering about a new "Caliphate" was getting super-tedious.
Erdogan is a bit conservative for my tastes, but there's no doubt that he has positioned Turkey for progressive leadership. Turkey is now a role model for all those fighting for the Arab Spring.
Thank you, Eric Margolis.
I have been reading Eric Margolis for as long as I can remember, and it is good to see his post here.
Manysummits
=====
Thank you, Mr. Margolis, for an enlightening column. Turkey should be the role model for the entire Mideast. It would be beneficial if Western countries took a page from Turkey's playbook, too.
How much closer to peace we would be if Western leaders would follow Erdogan's approach to Israel.
Any proponent for the improvement of the Palestinans' plight gets high marks from me.
"What Turks called 'the deep government' – hard rightists, security organizations, gangsters, the rich elite, and rabid nationalists -wielded power and crushed dissenters."
____________________
This statement almost rises to the level of "buried lede". It's gratifying to learn, as this unqualified term suggests, that "Turks" actually perceive and acknowledge "deep government".
Within the Amerikan Imperium's "Sphere of Legitimate Debate", the very notion of "deep government" or "deep politics" is ignored or dismissed as an esoteric concept validated only by crackpots or intellectual deviants.
In Amerika, the pseudo-pragmatic, two-dimensional "inside politics" that bubbles 24/7 in both mainstream corporate and "alternative" news and analysis is the be-all and end-all.
That's why Amerika spends most of its time pulling its own Weiner out of its nose.
I agree with the gist of this article, but it is a bit simplistic. Erdogan has done good things, but there is a danger that he is letting his success get to his head. Some of the prosecutions against writers, cartoonists, etc, are not a good sign.
Also, while praising Turkey, the article actually to some extent, underrates the good that the rise of the AKP has done, in the Muslim world. The example of the AKP, a political party coming to power via democracy, coming to power championing democracy, economic growth, income equality, has influenced Islamist parties in other Muslim countries (not simply in the MidEast) to some extent to also champion democracy, income equality, anti-corruption (instead of obsessing over jihads, how women are dressed, other religions)
"Turkey’s tame Muslim religious establishment was kept under tight security control. Under Ataturk and his successors, Islam, the bedrock of Turkish culture and ethos, was savagely attacked, nearly destroyed and brought under state control – just as the Russian Orthodox Church was during Stalin’s era.
"
Also this is simplistic.It is simplistic about Mustapha Kemal, it simplistic about Turkish culture, it is simplistic about Islam.
Margolis has a certain type of bias that comes through in most of his writings - a bias that doesn't seem to bother too many people here. His cursory mention of Armenia and Greek-Cyprus even while praising the “zero problems” policy shows that this is not quite a balanced presentation. It can also be argued that the AKP is building on the legacy of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and the Kemalist vision or ideology - a legacy that includes both good and bad. Eric Margolis is a certain kind of apologist who might appeal to people because he often writes about US imperialism - something that a smart grade school student can do (I know, I'm exaggerating on the grade school part). That said, I don't have any squabbles over anything factual in this article, but his cursory and somewhat dismissive mention of Armenia, Cyprus, the Kurds and Mustafa Kemal Ataturk indicates a possible bias. I still read his columns when I get a chance.
The problem isn't bias. People who dismiss Mustapha Kemal, forget that if the western powers had gotten their way, Turkey would be another Palestine, partitioned into bantustans, occupied, with Istanbul seized. Heck, there are STILL some Europeans today who want Istanbul "back".
The most telling fact is that under the "Islamist" Erdogan, relations with mortal enemy Greece have improved dramatically, and are better than they ever were during the time of the secular military regimes. There has even been a promising rapprochement with Armenia as indeed it was the Kemalists who were responsible for the Armenian Genocide.
Armenian Genocide. What Armenian Genocide?
Is Turkey now admitting it occurred?
-30-