EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
Popular content
Today's Top News
Synthetic Novelty vs. the Occupation of Two Islamic Countries
A week removed from the ninth anniversary of 9/11, after all the sound and fury has temporarily subsided, we can look back and know that we have just witnessed the realization of historian Daniel J. Boorstin's most renowned prophecy.
In his 1961 classic, "The Image," Boorstin famously predicted that real news and serious discourse would eventually be replaced by a "new kind of synthetic novelty" called "pseudo-events" - synthetic for their media-manufactured artificiality, pseudo for their lack of authenticity. Though these contrivances attract attention, Boorstin correctly pointed out that they typically represent no deeper ethos than vainglory.
That, of course, perfectly describes the hullabaloo surrounding Florida pastor Terry Jones and his much-hyped plans to burn the Quran. This hateful act, we were told, would have inflamed anti-Americanism in the Islamic world, potentially provoking a terrorist backlash. So grave was this supposed threat that the major media devoted 24-7 coverage to the controversy; President Obama publicly appealed to the pastor to abstain from creating "a recruitment bonanza for al-Qaida," and Defense Secretary Robert Gates personally intervened - as if it were a Defcon-1-worthy emergency.
As pseudo-events go, this was a landmark - not for Jones' abhorrent prejudice (unfortunately, we've seen this kind of detestable bigotry before) but for the outsized reaction to one obscure gadfly desperately seeking celebrity. Indeed, the national pandemonium was an emergent symptom of a destructive aneurysm deep within the American cortex - one that has profoundly altered our psychology. Whereas pseudo-events were once seen as cheap attempts to manipulate the public's perception of significance, the public - in the form of the media, the government and the rapt audience - took part in this pseudo-event, thus manufacturing significance from scratch.
That complicity - both in making this extremist an international star and in subsequently encouraging more such pseudo-events - is this story's real commentary on the downsides of distorted values, selective outrage and myopic worldviews. A commentary not about Jones, but about us, as just a few comparisons prove.
Consider, for instance, that in the very week the American media, political Establishment and electorate fretted over the possibility of Jones enraging the Muslim world, the same media, political Establishment and electorate paid no attention to a Guardian of London report finding that "Twelve American soldiers face charges over a secret 'kill team' that allegedly blew up and shot Afghan civilians at random and collected their fingers as trophies." We ignored this, as if the tasteless theater of a single iconoclast in Gainesville is somehow more troubling to Muslims than allegations that their innocent brethren are being hunted for sport in their homeland.
Similarly, as the president took to national television to worry about Jones posing a clear and present danger to national security, he didn't mention - nor did almost anyone else - that America's continued military occupation of two Islamic countries might endanger national security in a much bigger way.
And, of course, as pundits and their couch-potato sycophants lit up cable TV and talk radio with arguments about Jones potentially inciting a terrorist blowback against U.S. troops, few bothered noting that the killing of between 600,000 and 1 million Iraqi civilians in our war has probably done far more to prompt such a blowback.
No, we are too mesmerized by the synthetic novelty - too entranced, in this case, by the handlebar mustache and the camera-friendly promise of book burning. We don't think to ask uncomfortable questions nor do we strive for enlightened perspective. We instead tell ourselves that by joining the cartoonish pseudo-events, we will magically defuse pressing crises - even as our participation in those pseudo-events allows those crises to fester.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



18 Comments so far
Show All"Indeed, the national pandemonium was an emergent symptom of a destructive aneurysm deep within the American cortex - one that has profoundly altered our psychology. Whereas pseudo-events were once seen as cheap attempts to manipulate the public's perception of significance, the public - in the form of the media, the government and the rapt audience - took part in this pseudo-event, thus manufacturing significance from scratch."
The perfect psy-ops event.
dkshaw, Indeed, a "psy-ops event".
I had the same thought sometime in the middle of this 'event'.
"If a book burns in the middle of the forest and no one sees it...........?"
An 'unknown' man living in the middle of florida gets personal phone calls from the president and cabinet members? Imploring him, no less......
Touche.
Well, it was the corporate owned news organizations who decided to give all their attention to that demented preacher in Florida. Or perhaps it was the same billionaires who are funding the tea parties who helped promote him to international status. But I err, they are one and the same.
If some idiot preacher in Bismark North Dakota decides to burn 51 copies of the Bhagavad Gita and the Vedas, will he get this kind of broadcast and print attention? Of course not. It would not serve the pro-war aims, or the need to provoke. The story should not even have been in the news, but it must have been good for advertising revenues.
It distracted us from the real news of gaping holes in the official 9/11 narrative. "Truthers" were marginalized, then mocked or ignored. And it worked. I heard 10 times more about Korans and "Ground Zero Mosques"--everyone referred to it as a mosque, Keith Olberman called it a mosque after telling us it wasn't a mosque, Jon Stewart called it a mosque, the local news called it a mosque--than I did about "Truth" and never any coverage of recent reports. If it was mentioned, it was disparagingly. I'm sure the masterminds behind 9/11 are saying right now "Whew, that was close, next year we might have to start another war to distract 'em".
I even find the "Ground Zero" designation offensive.
Although the events of 9/11 were an appallingly violent and catastrophic tragedy, it's a sign of Amerika's cultural myopia, exceptionalism, and hubris that the US readily appropriated a term previously applied to sites devastated by nuclear bombs.
At least they could've called it "Ground One"-- or maybe "Groundgate", since Amerikan journalism never gets tired of recycling the "-gate" tic.
Thanks. I also find the "ground zero" very offensive. A planned demolition (whoever did it) of a few large city buildings is of a different order of magnitude than the effects of even a small-yield nuke. The area in New York affected is incredibly small when seen in the bigger picture of even Manhattan Island, and only a tiny dot on the map of the whole nation, and yet the events there were manipulated to become, in the neocon's own words, a new Pearl Harbor, and the rest of the country, and a good part of the rest of the world, has been dragged through one level or another of misery and trouble because of the American holy affection for that blasted spot in New York.
I am so sick of it and so mad, and like the rest of us, don't know how to stop it, only how to try and stay out of its way- which really is impossible to do completely, since it affects us all, supporters and non-supporters both.
911 was made into a casus belli. Bush wanted a war, for his own sick and twisted reasons, and it was a conspiracy to commit "war of aggression", the "supreme war crime".
So, 911 gave then an excuse to start two wars.
I don't believe the official 911 story, but even if true, the nation's reaction to it is something like, say, cutting off one's own arm and throwing it in a fire because a mosquito bit it.
But the whole purpose all along was profit, and the "joy" of the hunt for "wogs" to kill- to use the old Brit colonial term.
Also, there is the religious angle, which is very important.The wars are, in large part, a new Christian Crusade, under another guise. It is obvious how much these wars have to do with those who believe Revelation and apparently want to help poor incompetent God to bring it on.
Everything else- Al Qaeda, Hussein, the Taliban, has been a sham and a smokescreen to cover the real reasons for these wars.
They are, really, a national sin, and an international war crime of pretty huge proportions.
In so many ways it is Vietnam all over again. Vietnam, our former "American Holocaust", which killed three or four million, or more, Vietnamese.
Since the Second World War, The U.S. is catching up fast, or has already passed, the number of mass murders of civilians done by the Nazis.
Why we think our genocides are somehow more pure than the genocides of other nations is a mystery to me.
The Germans also thought their brand of genocide was good, not bad, and justified, and a good number of them were hung for it.
Damn the warmongers. Filthy curses are too good for them so that is all I will say.
When did we surrender? What Jones ( l am purposely not using "The Reverend" ) wanted to do was more proof the "Christian Right" is neither, but see Amendment 1 to The US Constitution, is not that what we are suppose to be fighting and dying for?
This insultingly obvious orchestrated theater passed as news would be simply impossible if we had fifty small media companies, as we did thirty years ago, instead of five behemoths, as we have today.
The airwaves must be returned to their rightful owners, the public. The broadcast licenses must be ripped from the talons of the fascist corporations that pose as news outlets. And the media megaliths must be anti-trusted into a fine dust.
Additionally, every media employee that knowingly lied us into war or read government/corporate propaganda must be tried as a war criminal.
--------------
Whoever controls the media controls the country. Period.
You are definitely right. The dilemma is how to accomplish it.
It's always about US. No mention about how it would effect pious Muslims, only that it might cause a backlash against American troops. No one mentioned that it was wrong to burn Korans, only that it might hurt the U.S. We are not the only people in the world who matter.
Unfortunately, pious muslims reacted like good little hand-puppets (in Indonesia and Afghanistan, or so I read in our media) and turned out to protest this (non) non-event, as they had with the Danish cartoons. They appear to be as capable of irrelevance as we are.
Or am I wrong, and it's really our media? (See Nick Turse's article on what's in Wikileaks.)
Book-burning as an expression of protest has a long history, especially among Christians. When you burn a book, you don't worry about how it would affect the people who've actually read it. There is knowledge in that book that threatens your world view, so it must be destroyed. The Koran flatly denies the divinity of Christ, so of course Christians see it as the work of Satan. The book-burning, ill-conceived and symbolic of hate, would not have been "wrong" in the same sense that flag-burning as protest is still protected. I do not support book-burning, but I don't believe God has written anything other than Mene Mene Tekel Upharsim, nor do I believe He's had His angels dictate His memoirs to anyone. All religions are based on myth. Not one has gotten "God" right. I'm getting chilled, I think I'll go throw another Holy Book on the fire.
Jones should burn the Bible instead. It's another book he's obviously never read and it's ideas would threaten his perverse approach to 'religion' far more than the Qu'ran.
the essence of the black bag and the black budget
is the ability to turn up the heat on the POT
no matter how hot it is already. Proving of course,
that you can carry out ANY treasonous crime as long
as you have the capability to overshadow it with
DISTRACTIONS...which is what the MOSQUE on
SACRED GROUND WAS !!!!!!!!!!!!So the lesson is when
"faux media" erupts, look elsewhere for the story(s).
by the way I am burning the bible, the
torah and a koran AS I WRITE THIS.
l heard a good tip on NPR; burn a dictionary, it has all the words of all the rest of those offending books in it, it would save time and trees and be better for the enviornment!
Unfortunately, war has become the norm for an American society that has been violentized.