Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Top Ten Worst Things about the Bush Decade; Or, the Rise of the New Oligarchs
By spring of 2000, Texas governor George W. Bush was wrapping up the Republican nomination for president, and he went on to dominate the rest of the decade. If Dickens proclaimed of the 1790s revolutionary era in France that it was the best of times and the worst of times, the reactionary Bush era was just the worst of times. I declare it the decade of the American oligarchs. Just as the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Soviet Union allowed the emergence of a class of lawless 'Oligarchs' in Russia, so Neoliberal tax policies and deregulation produced American equivalents. (For more on the analogy, see Michael Hudson.) We have always had robber barons in American politics, but the Neoliberal moment created a new social class. At about 1.3 million adults, it is not too large to have some cohesive interests, and its corporations, lobbyists, and other institutions allow it to intervene systematically in politics. It owns 45 percent of the privately held wealth and is heading toward 50, i.e. toward a Banana Republic. Thus, we have a gutted fairness doctrine and the end of anti-trust concerns in ownership of mass media, allowing a multi-billionaire like Rupert Murdoch to buy up major media properties and to establish a cable television channel which is nothing but oligarch propaganda. They established 'think tanks' like the American Enterprise Institute, which hires only staff that are useful agents of the interests of the very wealthy, and which produce studies denying global climate change or lying about the situation in Iraq. Bush-Cheney were not simply purveyors of wrong-headed ideas. They were the agents of the one percent, and their policies make perfect sense if seen as attempts to advance the interests of this narrow class of persons. It is the class that owns our mass media, that pays for the political campaigns of 'our' (their) representatives, that gives us the Bushes and Cheneys and Palins because they are useful to them, and that blocks progressive reform and legislation with the vast war chest funneled to them by deep tax cuts that allow them to use essential public resources, infrastructure and facilities gratis while making the middle class pay for them.
Here are my picks for the top ten worst things about the wretched period, which, however, will continue to follow us until the economy is re-regulated, anti-trust concerns again pursued, a new, tweaked fairness doctrine is implemented, and we return to a more normal distribution of wealth (surely a quarter of the privately held wealth is enough for the one percent?) It isn't about which party is in power; parties can always be bought. It is about how broadly shared resources are in a society. Egalitarianism is unworkable, but over-concentration of wealth is also impractical. The latter produced a lot of our problems in the past decade, and as long as such massive inequality persists, our politics will be lopsided.
10. Stagnating worker wages and the emergence of a new monied aristocracy. Of all the income growth of the entire country of the United States in the Bush years, the richest 1 percent of the working population, about 1.3 million persons, grabbed up over two-thirds of it. The Reagan and Bush cuts in tax rates on the wealthy have created a dangerous little alien inside our supposedly democratic society, of the super-rich, with their legions of camp followers (sometimes referred to as 'analysts' or 'economists' or 'journalists'). The new lords and ladies are the Dick and Liz Cheneys and the people for whom they shill. They are the Rupert Murdochs and the Richard Mellon Scaifes, and they are guaranteed to own more and more of the country as long as more progressive taxation (i.e. pre-Reagan, not pre-Bush) is not restored. They are the ones who didn't want a public universal health option, did not want the wars abroad to end abruptly, did not want the Copenhagen Climate convention to succeed. They are driven by pure greed and narrow profit-seeking for themselves. They always get their way, and they always will as long as you poor stupid bastards buy the line that when the government raises their taxes, it is taking something away from you. It is the alliance of the Neoliberal super-rich with the new lower middle class populists led by W. and now by Sarah Palin that produces clown politics in the US unmatched in most advanced industrial countries with the possible exception of Italy.
9. Health and food insecurity increased for ordinary Americans. Health care costs skyrocketed. Most Americans in the work force who have health care are covered via their employers. 'From 1999 to 2009 health insurance premiums increased 132%" for the companies paying most of the costs of coverage to their employees. Euromonitor adds, "Average private health insurance premiums for a family of four in 1999 were US$5,485 per annum or 7.2% of household disposable income. 2008 premiums were estimated at US$12,973 per annum or 14.8% of average household disposable income." By Bush's last year in office, food insecurity among American families was at a 14-year high. About 49 million Americans, one in six of us, worried about having enough food to eat at some points in that year, and resorted to soup lines, food stamps, or dietary shortcuts. Some 16 million, according to the NYT, suffered from '"very low food security," meaning lack of money forced members to skip meals, cut portions or otherwise forgo food at some point in the year.' Hundreds of thousands of children are going hungry in the richest country in the world. From being a proud, wealthy people, our social superiors reduced us to the estate of third-world peasants, so as to make sure their bonuses were bigger.
8. The environment became more polluted. The Bush administration was the worst on record on environmental issues. Carbon emissions grew unchecked, and the threat of climate change accelerated. In fact, Bush muzzled government climate scientists and had their reports rewritten by lawyers from Big Oil.
7. The imperial presidency was ensconced in ways it will be difficult to pare back. But note that its powers were never used against the oligarchs (unlike the case in Putin's Russia), but rather deployed to ensure the continued destruction of the labor movement and the political bargaining power of workers and the middle class, and to harass and disrupt peace, rights and environmental movements. A part of this process was the abrogation of fourth amendment protections against arbitrary search, seizure and snooping into people's mail and effects, and of other key constitutional rights under vague and unconstitutional rubrics such as 'providing material aid to terrorists,'(rights which seem unlikely ever to be restored).
6. The Katrina flood and the destruction of much of historic African-American New Orleans, and the massive failure of the Bush administration to come to the aid of one of America's great cities. The administration's unconcern about the unsound dam infrastructure, about climate change, and about the fate of the victims are all a wake-up call for what all of us have in store from the small social class that Bush served.
5. The Bush administration's post-2002 mishandling of Afghanistan, where the Taliban had been overthrown successfully in 2001 and were universally despised. The Bush administration's attempt to assert itself with a big troop presence in the Pashtun provinces, its use of search and destroy tactics and missile strikes, its neglect of civilian reconstruction, and its failure to finish off al-Qaeda, allowed an insurgency gradually to grow. It should have been nipped in the bud, but was not. Once an insurgency becomes well established, it is defeated militarily only about 20 percent of the time. Eight years later, the Neoconservative thrust into Central Asia (in search of hydrocarbon leverage, or in a geopolitical pissing match with Russia and China?) of the early years of this decade has bequeathed us yet another war, this time one that could destabilize neighboring Pakistan-- the world's sole Muslim nuclear power.
4. The Iraq War, which the US illegally launched a war of aggression that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, displaced 4 million (over as million abroad), destroyed entire cities such as Fallujah, set off a Sunni-Shiite civil war, allowed Baghdad to be ethnically cleansed of its Sunnis, practiced systematic and widespread torture before the eyes of the Muslim Middle East and the world, and immeasurably strengthened Iran's hand in the Middle East. All this on false pretexts such as 'weapons of mass destruction' or 'democratization,' for the sake of opening the Iraqi oil markets to US hydrocarbon firms-- a significant faction of the oligarchic class. Cost to the US in American military life: 4,373 dead as of Dec 15 and 31,603 wounded in combat. The true totals of war-related dead and injured are higher, since 30,000 troops who were only diagnosed with brain injuries on their return to the US are not counted in the statistics, according to Michael Munk. The cost of the Iraq War when everything is taken into account will likely be $3 trillion.
3. The great $12 trillion Bank Robberry, in which unscrupulous bankers and financiers were deregulated and given free rein to create worthless derivatives, sell impossible mortgages to uninformed marks who could not understand their complicated terms, and then to roll this garbage up into securities re-sold like the Cheshire cat, with a big visible smile of asserted value hanging in the air even as their actual worth disappeared into thin air. Having allowed the one-percent oligarchs to capture most of the increase of the country's wealth in recent decades, Bush and Paulsen now initiated the surrender to them of nearly a further entire year's gross domestic product of the US, stealing it from the rest of us by deficit budget financing that will have the effect of deflating our savings and property values and relative value of our currency against other world currencies. That is, we are to be further beggared for sake of the super-rich. And while the banks and bankers are held harmless, the hardworking Americans who have lost and will lose their homes are extended virtually no help. While 500,000 American children will go hungry at least some of the time this year, the Oligarchs at Goldman, Sachs, will get millions in bonuses, on the backs of the ordinary taxpayers. It seems likely to me that the creation of a pool of vast excess liquidity for the super-rich by the Reagan-Cheney tax cuts was what impelled them to develop the derivatives, since they had too much capital for ordinary investment purposes and were restlessly seeking new gaming tables. The conclusion is that until we get our gini coefficient back into some sort of synch, we are likely at risk for further such meltdowns.
2. The September 11 attacks on New York and Washington by al-Qaeda, an organization that stemmed from the Reagan administration's anti-Soviet jihad in the 1980s and which decided that, having defeated one superpower, it could take down the other. Al-Qaeda's largely Arab volunteer fighters had confronted the Soviets over their occupation of a major Muslimm country, Afghanistan. Bin Laden was himself a Neoliberal Oligarch, but he broke with the Gulf consensus of seeking a US security umbrella, thus creating a fissure within his powerful social class. Al-Qaeda viewed the US as only a slightly less objectionable occupier, though they were willing to make an atliance of convenience in the 1980s. But they were increasingly enraged and galvanized to strike, they said, by the post-Gulf-War sanctions on Iraq that killed 500,000 children, the debilitating Israeli occupation of the Palestinians, and the establishment of US bases in the holy Arabian Peninsula (with its oil riches that Bin Laden believed were being looted for pennies by the West, aided by a supine and corrupt Saudi dynasty). Al-Qaeda was a small fringe crackpot group of murderous conspiracy theorists, since most of what they considered an American 'occupation' of Muslims was no such thing. The leasing of Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia was comparable to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? They intended to make themselves look like a world-historical force, and the US new Oligarchs, who no longer had the international Communist conspiracy with which to scare the American public into letting them have their way, were happy to buy in to the hyping of al-Qaeda, as well. But the catastrophe was not only the attacks, deadly and horrific though they were, but the alacrity with which Americans rsurrendered their birthright of yeoman liberties to a Bonapartist regime that ran roughshod over law, the constitution, the Congress, and anyone, such as Ambassador Joe Wilson, who dared oppose it.
1. The constitutional coup of 2000, in which Bush was declared the winner of an election he had lost, with the deployment of the most ugly racial and other low tricks in the ballot counting and the intervention of a partisan and far right-wing Supreme Court (itself drawn from or serving the oligarchs), and which gave us the worst president in the history of the union, who proceeded to drive the country off a cliff for the succeeding 8 years. And that is because he was not our president, but theirs.




82 Comments so far
Show AllRight On.
Obama is perpetuating items 2 through 10. Rather than a decade-long program, Obama is turning it into a century-long program.
Amazing how this article just re-hashes old news to make the Neofascist Lite(TM) party look "good" in comparison, and so many fawn with praise. I'm so pleased the Ds have super-majorities in both Houses and Obama is in power, we are seeing so much change in policy.
Very well put. The only critique I have of this article is the continued acceptance of the 'official' report of the 9/11 commission which was a complete white wash of Justice and investigative intelligence. Once the truth comes to the main stream population we will realize that this was the biggest cover-up in history and the crime that birthed the era of war crimes and crimes against humanity that continue to this day by the Oligarch's and Fascist elite that run the U.S. of A.
Sioux Rose
RISING: You hit the nail on the head. This was also the only thing I disagreed with in Cole's otherwise scathing and all-too accurate article.
The true exact details of 9/11 don't really matter from a historical perspective, since the event gave rise to the ability to introduce the already prepared Patriot Act and the subsequent events. Furthermore the true perpetrators will never see justice since they will all be dead before the truth ever comes out.
So in many respects I think the 9/11 conspiracy theorists throw too much energy into a 'fait accompli' when the consequences of the event are much more demanding of attention.
That is not to say that I believe the 9/11 commission or do not find the collapse of WTC7 unusual.
Bullshit!
Very good point about 911. I think people are naive to think just because Clinton (and now Obama) are in office that the neocons will just kinda hang around and wait their turn. The thing I just can't figure out is what motive someone like Bin laden would have in joining forces with the neocons who perpetrated 911?
LOL! A real knee-slapper, that last sentence!
Certainly. And they have been able to accumulate this wealth and power because of the absence of serious political opposition. And this is because the non-elites are divided by the social issues (whites vs. blacks, Christians vs. non-Christians, women vs. men, pro-immigrant vs. anti-immigrant, etc...) far more than they were in FDR's time. And that is no coincidence.
Sioux Rose
KIVALS: As per the division among the non-elites, how does that square with the following factors:
1. Control of media so that the truth does NOT get out there
2. Fiscal control of the think tanks that shape public opinion so that genuine causative factors are NEVER discussed
3. Role of sports in massaging the nation's psyche towards teams, war, and winning!
4. A Supreme Court that never met a pro-environmental decision it could support
5. An educational system that dumbs minds down and seeks uniformity as opposed to a vibrant class of thinkers
6. Karmic blowback for the great many wars and acts of aggression that the US has led, devised or championed
7. That PRE-selected candidates are vetted who will not shake up the status quo (no one else, for the most part, GETS the spotlight)
8. That the 2-party system has its own built-in "gridlock" that precludes other parties from gathering necessary momentum (see # 1)
9. That our nation is probably the most heavily populated by armed guards in the history of the modern world. The use of Lasers, noise devices for crowd control, intercepting emails of activists, cordoning off "protest" zones, etc... marginalizing these events so that they don't show up in the news. All of these factors diffuse the angst that might otherwise make protests viable and visible.
10. The prevalence of right wing radio shock jocks there to take the ample anger and misdirect it at the least responsible targets, a tactic that works very well with less-informed persons.
So the division among non-elites is, of course, a factor, but it is far from the only one, nor in my view, the most dynamic one given items 1-10, and I left out others, no doubt. Perhaps some in the forum might add to this list.
The sophisticated gameplan to divide the non-elites was the beginning of the end of this extremely flawed political system and nation, as Nixon devised a successful strategy to divide the people using social/cultural issues to win his two elections (as LBJ noted, he opened the door wide with the passage of the Civil Rights Act, which he knew would be exploited by the worst of the demagogues). Since then, as the elites have further consolidated their power and control, they have added factors you listed and more. However, I still think that division is at the core of the problem. Coalitions such as those that elected FDR have become impossible to form, as so many of the poor inevitably cling to religion (in the US, Christianity) as they have nothing else, and the corporate elites do all they can to promote scorn for religion and for the religious among the young and the educated (who can pass up such an easy way to feel superior to so many millions of people?). Even members of the left in the US have in some ways been deformed by the corporatocracy.
Of course the US may be unsalvageable, with its history of genocide, slavery, racism, Social Darwinism, and corporatism, and its superficial culture constructed by con-men, of various levels of sophistication, to sell the rubes what they don't need and to protect the oligarchs and their capital anywhere on the globe, including raising armies to support US imperialism. I get so irritated with those who assume that China or any other country will follow the path the US oligarchs have set for this country. The US is uniquely damaged and deformed, and I believe it is unlikely that any particular nation will become so depraved and warped.
hey, kivals and sioux rose...nice exchange...
what about the land beneath us? I still hold that all power stems from the fact that we are denied life's necessities if we have no money...we have no physical place to stand, or sit, or sleep, or grow food, or anything else, without income...this is the harness to which they hitch us...
these wealthy bastards stole our land at gunpoint and are selling and leasing it back to us, slowly, over our entire lifetimes...
before all is said and done, we will fight, physically, for the land, and our inherent rights to it...let's do it together on September 22, 2012...better together than alone...
Sioux: good, as always, to hear from you again. If I can find the time, I'll try to add to your list.
Kivals: "Even members of the left in the US have in some ways been deformed by the corporatocracy." I couldn't agree more. So many of my leftist friends (and of course I consider myself a leftist as well) have the same sneering, dismissive, know-it-all attitude as those they say they oppose. Especially if they are remotely successful in their particular walk of life. Ideas are worn on the sleeve, as signs of one's innate superiority. I often find I understand--emotionally, if not intellectually--the reaction of the "simple folks" to what they see as liberal elitism. For the political "left" in the US, and in most of the West, these days, does not really look beyond liberalism. That is, it does not look beyond a position that is by definition contradictory, embracing worthy ideals, perhaps, while refusing to criticize or do anything to change the inherently unjust structures of the society that ensures that injustice will always prevail. And this continues to be the case, even at a moment when consumer/finance capitalism is at the edge of the precipice, and before us looms only the unknown.
Good point. Sometimes I am amazed by the number of people I encounter who "know it all." I put out my opinions, and I will defend them, but I know in the end they are limited, flawed, and can be improved upon, as all opinions can be. We have very limited finite models of an infinitely complicated reality, so of course our opinions are flawed and always will be (I even suspect that on many issues, as we went deeper and deeper into them, we could very well flip back and forth on our positions with respect to them). Certainly some opinions/hypotheses may be defended better than others, especially if they have demonstrable evidence supporting them, particularly evidence that such opinions/hypotheses offer greater predictability of the environment in question. But it often becomes too easy to latch onto an opinion and to wear it "on the sleeve," as you say, as proof of one's "innate superiority."
Sioux Rose
KIVALS: I understand the endurance of the class struggle, and it is as you relate, a key factor. Which came first, that horse or another cart, I do not think can be entirely determined. I enjoy your posts and the nuanced thought process that goes into them. I do not aim my words in any confrontational manner, it's more showing complementary themes that may expand the pool of factors, or in your own parlance, lead to expanded models.
CLOVIS: Thank you for the head's up.
DUBET: Your always bearing witness to the "Green man" ideal, speaking for the land's own autonomy is laudible. Tonight I had to deal with driving in a city (a fate I stay away from on a very regular basis), and the more I identify with living away from it all, the more I experience this "other world" in bass relief. I mean, if anyone drives the entire expanse of a state like Florida or California (and I've seen similar in New York), it's like each city is its own world. Sometimes the flavor of each enclave is utterly distinct, so much so, that it would not seem tied to another place a mere 15 miles north or south of its own zone.
Anyway, I was contemplating this idea of how today's extreme right wing decisions are being marketed as being "centrist" or "moderate." My mind then skipped to the idea that some very dangerous forms of waste are being marketed under the heading of organic, and that words, themselves are being divested of meaning. The entire universe of language is being deconstructed in a manner that runs parallel to the ways that money has just been replaced with its illusory, inflated cousin, the derivative. The dark side is taking actual things of worth, fashioning the singing sirens of the media so that they can readily seduce minds to a version of reality that is the product of the marriage of Mammon (where profit trumps all other values) and Mars (where ANY THING is worth fighting over, since the fight itself can be profitable). This passive ideology promulgated as culture could not be more anti-thetical to life, and the remotest forms of genuine humane human interest.
The US is like a dangerous junkie that doesn't even recognize the nature of its addictions because these have been as insidiously placed into the weave of its life as have been torture practices placed on the menu of the average off-shored detainee. LAW has broken down so utterly... those with the least interest in sustaining life, in just values, in basic integrity have gained control of a lot of levers. I do believe the equal and opposite force is beginning to come out of its stupor, realizing that it fell for that one singular sin said to be the dark side's finest: deception, a/k/a P.R. (If you haven't seen "Century of the Self" it's time, if you're ready to put more pieces together. Zeitgest Addendum, too.) If you like fireworks, you signed up to incarnate (now) for a really big show.
"LAW has broken down so utterly... those with the least interest in sustaining life, in just values, in basic integrity have gained control of a lot of levers."
Sioux Rose, that, and much more of what you write, is beautiful. I really appreciate your ability to put words together. Thanks.
Sioux Rose
KIVALS: You are very kind, and I wish you happy, HEALTHY holidays. The past few days I have begun to think about looking into the purchase of a little place in another country. With Obama continuing the make-war state, the new organized crime muscle incentives encouraged on the part of the insurance companies, and watching nature die as leaders in the West turn their savage backs on these calamities... makes me wonder about residing amongst an ilk that maybe still owns the capacity to feel. I know there are many in this forum who do care and struggle for personal meaning, not to mention a "strategy" that will heal all the woes. During Dark Ages the enlightened often have to remain underground, lest they become wiped out. Like Michael Jackson, I am not a fighter... and yet it may come to street fights, a real break down of "civil" society as the elites are finding more and more ways to extract more and more funds from "the little people." The banks seize the public's money and return them a thank you in the form of raising interest rates on our credit cards, whilst paying 1/10th that interest rate on our CDS. Heists are breaking out all over. There are saner places to reside. I've had this thought for a few years, thought it would be safe to place aside when Obama got in. Most of us figured that the democratic tradition of throwing a few crumbs to the left would take place, a slowing down of the savage decimation of those laws that made this nation special in some ways, at least in terms of its ideals at inception. Without this forum those of us that see what's going on would probably consider ourselves gone mad, that such things could not possibly be happening...
Torture made legal, a policy of state
Unitary executive monarch-style rites never rescinded
Wars continued after excuses have fallen away like masks melted off wax figures
Back room deals with society's greatest trespassers while enormous segments of the public (and its interests) are sold-off to the highest bidders
Civil liberties placed on the auction block under Bush never re-instated
State crimes the new pragmatism, and/or "business as usual."
... and so much more.
Leaving sounds like a good idea. After my son graduates from highschool (should be in 2014), I plan to retire and my wife and I are thinking of bailing out as well, though we understand that health concerns that may come up could change our plans. If we do go, we will probably stay in this hemisphere as we do not want to make it too difficult for our son to visit us.
Happy and Healthy Holidays to you too!
take the kid with you and go now.
or do you think he'll benefit from a high school indoctrination?
I have my son pretty indoctrinated already (at our house, we often discuss Marx, Lenin, Mao, Voltaire, and Bentham, as well as FDR, Lincoln, Jefferson, Reagan, W Bush, Obama, Kucinich, Nader, Sanders, and others). I am fairly confident the propaganda he receives from the school will have no effect. He is an excellent student, strong in every subject, and we hope he can get a scholarship from a good school in the US for his undergraduate studies.
make that "just" business as usual.
Siouxrose,
as always right on, however:
the spectacle of faux religion as practiced by "palin like" masses, also called teabaggers or astroturfers and some such derivatives. No other country, as yet, could make a claim like this to have followers morosely echoing the sermons given from the pulpit of the RNC or other rightwing organization.
Sioux Rose
KOMMANDER: Thanks for the head's up. Just tonight I was thinking that if I were a musician I'd do a song that followed along these lyrical lines:
What's been done in the name of Jesus,
done in the name of Allah,
What's been spent in the name of Abraham,
or that of Jehovah, the Buddha, even Obama...
These could write the book of sin
in the shed blood of so many innocents.
Because religions have largely stepped down and away from any claim to spiritual integrity, they have played a huge role in convincing followers that it is their God's will to kill "other." How many would seriously take on that type of activity were they not utterly convinced that breaking this singular moral code that no intact soul should cross were not serving a higher purpose? In a sense, the ruse of patriotism establishes the nation-state as a symbolic extension of the deity. It is a great travesty what has been done in the name of God... faux religion, in DEEDS darker than a new moon night way beyond city lights.
Looking back I think the Raygun Eighties were worse. Sure the Chimp was selected but Ronnie Satan payed off the kidnappers even before he was swarn in as president. You CAN deal with terrorists! The Chimp gave us Blackwater but the Gladiator of Grendader gave the Contras aids. Remember Ronnie's Freedom Fighters? Nice guys, slice off your ear, make you eat it, then shoot you in the head. I lived through the Vietnam '60s but the Gipper made me realize how much I dislike the United States. I was never worried about USSR's war-heads pointed at me. I was more worried that Ronnie would get up in the middle of the night to take a leak,hit the wrong button and launch a nuke instead of turning on the light.
Cole's piece provides an excellent summary of facts with regard to our plutocratic oligarchy; however, I would argue that the rise of the "new" oligarchs actually started with the Reagan Administration. The Bush Administration simply amplified their radical-right neoliberal extremes and flagrant, brazen disdain of lawfulness. Remember, the corrupt Supreme Court that brought Bush to office in 2000 was assembled prior to his reign of terror. Without those criminals, Bush never would have become the worst president in history.
"...the rise of the "new" oligarchs actually started with the Reagan Administration." YES. This was done once every national leader and mass movement for economic and social justice had been ritually defamed, falsely imprisoned, or extra judicially executed under the rubric of COINTELPRO from say roughly MLK's assassination by agents of the government through the late 70's. And of course they'll still kill you today if you threaten the wealth or privilege of the Oligarchs.
Bush built on Watergate and The Enterprise (Iran-Contra) and had the same people from Nixon's and Ray-gun's time to help him - even the convicted felons. What a country.
Just look at the GINI coefficient for the USA from 1973-2009. The shift in distribution of income and wealth started way before Raygun. Clinton saw through NAFTA, social spending cuts, defense budget increases, and tax cuts for the wealthy, just like Raygun.
Absoultely--I completely agree.
The deficit in democracy in this country over the better part of the last 30 - 40 years is by design of the architects of policy--the oligarchs--it didn't start with Bush II. As Adam Smith pointed out many years ago, the architects of policy protect their own interests no matter how egregious the effects on others. Politicians, regardless of party affiliation, are the tools they use to achieve their interests; they are simply courtiers. So, yes, of course, the Clinton Administration played a huge role in the country's business-run state policies--more proof that democratic forms are merely pretenses. With the Obama Administration at the helm, it should now be evident to anyone with a pulse that the political party in 'power' at any given period of time is not relevant, as the two major parties have essentially colluded into one, subservient only to the architects of policy who finance their campaigns. I tried explaining this to someone on CD the other day who was still waxing obsequious over Bill Clinton, but I got nowhere.
Yes, Reagan was nearly as bad. But he didn't do the one thing that Mr Cole has neglected to mention, which was to stack the "justice department" with their own cronies who had just as few morals and ethics as they did. It was a guarantee that no matter what did, there would be no charges pressed against anyone involved. How Scooter slipped through I have no idea.
Reagan's cabal had more convicted felons by the time he left office than any other president in history. W SHOULD have been number one in that regard, but he stacked the deck and made sure that he wouldn't be. Cheney learned his lesson well from having seen what happens when you leave HONEST people in justice positions. He made sure that they removed them all and put in those who had just as little regard for law as he did.
I think that leaving out the politicization of the justice department is a glaring omission in this list. But with SO much failure and destruction going on at once, it's hard to decide what are the MOST wrong things. So much failure and disaster, so little time.
BTW, the teabaggers and those who want to make the worst 8 years in leadership of our history just amaze me. W said in public that the "haves and the have more's" were HIS CONSTITUENCY. Which do these teabaggers think THEY are? Sad that they will never realize that they are NEITHER part of who W gives a damn about.
It is ironic that the righties, conservatives,Palin and repugnants hold up Ronnie Raygun as a paragon of virtue. That tells you all you need to know about them! My uncle knew Reagan personally and before he passed away he thought he was the worst President in U.S. history, but he never lived to see Bush, who was possibly worse.
Funny how we all have short memories: Obama praised Reagan several times in public, for example:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/17/6445
Maybe that is because Obama is a neoconservative Reaganite?
I'd like to second the point made by risingdawn earlier.
A deep fog of lies has been thrown over that day's events by the same media noted in Cole's piece. If people can put aside the emotional conviction that "our" government wouldn't do anything so heinous to its own citizens the truth is plain to see.
For instance, when a building falls down or collapses because it can no longer withstand the force of gravity it doesn't throw out multi-ton girders sideways 500-600 feet with enough force to imbed them into neighboring buildings. Explosives are required to provide that much energy. That's not supposition or a theory...it's elementary physics.
The truth is hiding in plain sight folks if you can look past the lies.
I've often wondered how the American populace will react when they allow themselves to see through the propaganda. My hope is that the revulsion will be so great that they will purge these parasites from our midst and go about forming a government of the people...
The great majority of the American sheeple are so brainwashed by Foxy News and the rest of our whore media that they just cannot believe our government would do this to our own citizens and they are so closed minded that when I have mentioned that our government had no compunction about murdering 55,000 of our soldiers in Viet Nam some reply: " Well, we stopped Communism ". I do not know what it will take to wake these kind of people up.
"I've often wondered how the American populace will react when they allow themselves to see through the propaganda."
They won't react at all, in fact, they will continue to believe the propaganda. The majority of Americans still believe that the attack on Pearl Harbor was unwarranted and an utter surprise, despite some 50 years of the airing of evidence to the contrary.
If you look at the 9/11 footage from reporters viewing the scene they practically unanimously describe the buildings falling "as if it was a controlled demolition" or "as we have seen so many times in controlled demolition".
Only later did the story change to fit the propaganda.
With THAT kind of "resume," the Bush/Cheney Regime should have no problem being admitted into HELL!
but wait, there's more!
with Obama, Gates, Emanuel, Clinton, Geithner et al. right behind them. Too bad Hell is only a fairy tale.
Thanks to Big Money, the NRA, and the Religious Right (Wrong), we are pretty well screwed. It looks like it is every man for himself, so people better get prepared for the worst. What is funny, there are dummies out demonstrating against their own welfare, but the right wing loudmouths have them scared of their own shadow.
Less bread and more circus seems to have worked for them so far. Maybe when there is an army of homeless due to the increasing number of foreclosures, maybe when the unemployed have exhausted their benefits and run through their savings, families and friends, maybe when even more people are freezing and starving in the streets, maybe then people will rise up and challenge these gluttonous jackals of wealth.
Or maybe we'll just huddle together in the cold and watch the big screen television in the store window while the falling snow makes a blanket around us.
"Or maybe we'll just huddle together in the cold and watch the big screen television in the store window while the falling snow makes a blanket around us.'
And Murdoch will have the news tits ladies bare breasted so the watchers don't freeze to death (and don't notice the headlines about the new MRE cat and dog food brands for the troops costing $100 a can).
Every second they can distract us from noticing their rape and pillage of our society is more profit for them and a quicker death for us. I think Bush called it a two fer'.
Nice detail and write-up. But ANCIENT HISTORY, Juan.
Better start paying attention to the corporate-fascist conman CURRENTLY in office, who -- because of his studied cool and CrestStrips teeth -- is a far more dangerous character than the hapless fool from Crawford.
I'm sure Mr. Cole will be glad to inform us how bad 2010-2019 was, after the pillage is over, of course.
Time Magazine had it right. 2000-2009 REALLY was the
'Decade from Hell'.
How else can you explain the worst SCOTUS decision since Dred Scott(Bush v Gore), Chimpy as the self-appointed decider, the Great Depression II, two illegal and unjustified and losing wars, the ripping up of the Bill of Rights, torture as official state policy, and Habeas corpus is just a quaint memory.
The problem with Bush v Gore wasn't the decision, it was that the Court agreed to hear the case AT ALL.
Vote count accuracy in Florida is entirely the business of the State of Florida.
The U.S. Constituiton instructs that the U.S House of Representatives decide a winner in the case of a Prez Election where no one obtains an Electoral College majority.
The "SCOTUS" never should have been involved at all.
The Repubs controlled Florida (but NOT its Supreme Court) and the House, so the Dems were given the cover of a logical (but FALSE) narrative for why they joined with the Repubs and the U.S. Supreme Court Judges in shredding the U.S. (and really Florida's too) Constitution.
Also, "decade" means TEN years, not nine. And Bush II was only in office from 1-01 to 1-09 so that would be EIGHT years, which is also not a "decade".
-matti.
This article is absolutely useless, distorted and intellectually lazy.
Juan Cole is a sycophantic punidt loyal to the DLC. This is just as bad as the garbage on TV news.
More black and white, simplistic, childish, two-party nonsense. It's all those bad ol Rs fault. Now that we have D super-majorities in both Houses and Obama in power, we are seeing a real difference in policy eh?
Hear! Hear! George Wanker Bush is dead! Long Live FUBARack Obama!
Exactly.
A really feeble attempt to cover the Dem Party's (Corporatist Party -Blue Wing's) involvement in the horrors of the last "decade".
Personally, this doesn't bother me as much as:
1. The fact that, feeble as it is, it actually WORKS on so many. Just look at some of the comments here (and imagine what they are like on Huff Post, for instance).
2. The bizarre, yet casually implicit, assertion that NINE YEARS constitutes a "decade".
3. The even more bizarre, yet equally casually implicit, assertion that such a "decade" somehow BELONGS to Bush II! As if the EIGHT YEARS from 1-20-01 to 1-20-09 is the equivalent of the TEN YEARS from 1-01-00 to 1-01-10!
I guess as long as one is going to spout crazy B.S. one might as well really commit, huh?
Excellent Article