Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
No Currency Left to Buy the Big Lies
As I contemplated the real possibility of an Obama victory and listened to right wing pundits revise history still unfolding, I thought of titles for this blog:
"Neocon Logic: This Statement is Untrue"
"The Modern Free Market System is False But a New Revelation Shall Come"
" They Would Feast on Themselves: All the Money's Gone, Nowhere to Go"
I decided on:
"No Currency Left to Buy the Big Lies"
In the pre-capitalist reality, James Madison said when he put power in the hands of the business elite, he would be entrusting "enlightened statesmen and benevolent philosophers who would devote themselves to the welfare of all."
Clearly, he believed this statement in the way I guess some modern Republicans do. The only problem was that he eventually realized this didn't work and in 1792, disillusioned and worried about the democratic experiment, condemned what he called "the daring depravity of the times." He went on to denounce the business elites who, given ultimate power, "become tools and tyrants of government...they overwhelm government with their powers and combinations and are bribed by its largesse." That's how he perceived the system he had helped design. In 2008, this is an apt description of the Republican relationship to government and power.
Finally, some blue light, tectonic plate shifts, a sea change, we hear... a wave of despair carrying us to a new place. The bastards are finally meeting their grisly ends and will be discarded and abandoned as men come to power who will actually try to govern. I know we're supposed to be civil but I'm not a real believer in this method when dealing with crimes.
What does the sea change mean? How can we help people understand what is happening and help them contextualize it?
First the past: Senator McCain, Governor Palin and assorted surrogates are delusional and breathtakingly corrupt. They disgrace themselves and their country as they lie, smear, slur and write it off as political manner.
Yet the creeping truth must frighten them late at night: there is no currency left to buy the big lies.
There is no more money left to loan or borrow the big lies or to sell them. No more money left to pay off the debt, the wreckage in the wake. The orgy of excess has drained every bottle, smashed the furniture and left the cupboards bare. All that's left is derivative debts -- bets between liars and lies. Trillions of dollars. It turned capitalism into a Ponzi scheme for trading worthless paper. No real value anywhere. No matter how much money Ben Bernanke prints.
We are asked to stand over the abyss and experience our own destruction as another political game show -- just another surreal horse race. We watch millionaires and paid Republican hacks appear on television yelling "Socialist!" at Obama as if the Bolsheviks are coming to rape our daughters. These are the same people who oversaw the greatest upward redistribution of wealth in the history of this country. The same people who, through general lawlessness and a privatization frenzy, succeeded in shredding the Constitution, turning war, illegal domestic spying, security, border patrol, interrogation, and even torture into profitable industries gorging on the state.
So define the big lie: free marketers want free markets. Not so, the facts say. They are the biggest welfare freaks on the planet.
These men and keepers of the faith would lecture us with a straight face on the evil socialists/ communists/terrorists /vampires/space aliens who would dare "redistribute wealth" by amending the tax code. Two wars and the only shared sacrifice they want is more tax cuts for the rich and for the U.S. citizenry to continue shopping. As Sidney Falco said, you gotta give it to them, their gall is gorgeous.
If we stay the course, we are told, we will finally, one day, reach that shining city on a hill, the free market-based fundamentalist utopia. (Hyper link black mass) Even though all evidence points the other way, we should listen, reason, step back and watch them as they devour what's left of the government. They will feast on themselves -- the feast of carrion the Book of Revelation tells us -- but I digress, sort of. It's over. This would be a great system if there were no human beings.
Mathematical realism. Eat what you kill. The bottom line. Greed is good. Graphs and flow charts and metrics for success. All social organization is based on profit as the unifying force and engine of the common good and even social justice; worship the market, even as you corrupt it.
Our perfect system will provide for all.
And yet Wall Street cripples America and the world because it won't adhere to the same rules it says we must obey for the good of freedom. Because reality won't be a slave to their machine.
And so this is how we can rationalize privatizing war. At last look, with 630 corporations like Blackwater and Halliburton getting 40% of the $2 billion spent each week in Iraq, no one can doubt the corporatist dominance of the war machine.
Mathematically, the market crash shouldn't have happened according to their system, but human feelings make panic and panic cannot be calculated. I would bet that someday someone will discover that math adheres to a quantum reality: the participants and the observers affect the outcome. I digress again. But not really.
Instead of an international consensus based on trust and global community, the Neocons say trust no one, need no one, ask no one. Rigged, "open" markets are created at the barrel of a gun after bombing a country. We must all bow to the market.
Collapse, chaos, lawlessness. And even the market voted with its feet.
The era of market idolatry is over.
This is the end of Milton Friedman, Reaganomics and supply-side theory. This ideology has never been about free markets but a fundamentalist vision that is a cover for naked aggression and a social contract based on fear and greed. The government's job is to create optimal conditions for corporate profit, to privatize everything in sight and to sell off its own body parts. To literally devour itself.
So we have laws that allow borrowing money against derivatives -- basically a bet between two people who create nothing without collateral. They leveraged the public financial health on something you wouldn't be allowed to do in Vegas. It illustrates the corruption that has become institutionalized through deregulation and a culture of predatory greed. Alan Greenspan testified that he was shocked: business didn't regulate itself. The common good was not achieved by greed. Naomi Klein read him the definition of crony capitalism and asked if it fit the description of the Bush administration's relationship to its favorite corporations.
I suppose he was shocked about that too. His testimony was incredible and felt like it was coated in lies or at least standing deeply in their shadows. But one doesn't doubt him as a true believer, absolved of messy feelings of collective responsibility. We made him a high priest even though we saw the suffering and the cruelty of the system.
The final irony of the free-market Darwinist model is instead of the strongest and best surviving, it's really the weakest and the worst. From a moral and spiritual point of view this is hardly in doubt. See George Bush. The gospel he purports to serve tells us this but perhaps he saw Christ as a conqueror. I've always doubted men who call themselves Christians who live by the law of the jungle. The gospels, the Koran and the Torah make no bones about it: wealth is not strength; power often represents not the brightest and the best but the weakest and worst. The beast in the Book of Revelation is not a horn-rimmed devil but Rome. Empire. Any empire. Every empire.
As Bush leaves office, the real truth is this: the new economies of the world disprove everything he ever said. Apparently that doesn't matter.
Neoconservatives will lie in the weeds and gather forces, the same players in a revolving door. They want back in and if history has proved anything, worshiping the markets is not enough. We must actually kill to feed them. A horrible cross-pollination of fundamentalism, dementia and market fever has turned America into a willing enabler of corporate cannibalism. Nothing else to call it when murder is seen as a legitimate extension of economic policy. Preemptive war is not only justified but openly referred to as a market opportunity. The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must. As we look out at the wreckage -- world economies collapsing, nationalized banks and a complete loss of trust -- we can see the hypocrisy as all are revealed as true socialists on the way down, crying in their scotch and Ambien as they run to the state for cover.
Many, like the Financial Times, endorse Obama. But let's remember when the F.T. and the Wall Street Journal talked glowingly and starry-eyed about the "Baghdad Boom" -- as horrifying a moniker as Shock and Awe. It was not the site of a gold rush, it was the sight of massacre and armed robbery. Now these men jump like rats off a death ship but don't be fooled. Francis Fukuyama and company will just lay low, regroup and rebrand. They speak openly about such things, beaten but unbowed, with no moral connection to the fiasco they have fostered. They speak as passing spectators watching the Weather Channel, (see Frum, Crystal, Brooks and all the rest), rather than intellectual architects, defenders, and foot soldiers in an illegal war and the thirty-five year assault on the New Deal.
As we help Obama try to implement another New Deal, I asked Naomi Klein about the parallels to The Shock Doctrine as it's polar opposite. She told me:
"I have been talking about the need for a progressive shock doctrine in speeches a lot. I call it disaster populism and the key difference is democracy. The right has been using shocks to suspend and sidestep democracy, declaring states of emergency and the progressive use of shock to enlarge and deepen the democratic space to bring more people into the political process. This is why it is important to remember that the New Deal did not come only from kindly elites handing it down from on high, but also because those elites were under massive popular pressure from below. We can all use shock and crisis to move the political direction of the country, but the progressive route is a democratic one, the right is an authoritarian one, even if it takes place within an electoral democracy."
The real challenge is to erase the delusion that greed equals freedom and prosperity, let alone the hideous lie that it somehow spreads justice. Amazingly, we are asked to listen to this gibberish in political life no matter how high the bile rises.
Many believe economies must serve humanity and not the other way around. Economies must make a moral connection to the republic. Brace yourselves free marketers: the quality of economic and human transactions will have to take priority over money. Faith and hope have to manifest in the social transactions we make.
A new social contract could be coming based on a real currency my friend Kevin McCabe calls the currency of grace. It is a currency of economic fairness and institutionalizing concepts of shared responsibility; a currency based on the gold standard that every human has value and should be awarded respect and opportunity, the dignity that comes from human beings protecting each other from the values and ideals of a Darwinist world. Its spirit is in Keynesian economics, a mixed economy with regulated markets and social spending. In the new era, we must remove fundamentalist right wing economists as the high priests and kings. Their ideology will stay dead only if we remain vigilant and call things what they are. It's a battle for the idea of America and it's just beginning if Senator Obama becomes president.
We should worship God if we want to, not the markets.
R.I.P Studs Terkel.
For more on War, Inc. go to my MySpace Page, or Amazon.com.



50 Comments so far
Show AllIt is hard to get excited about two Cats who feed from the same polluted trough while lecturing the rest of us about justice: namely Cusak and Obama.
My vote will be again going to a Third Party candidate.
Good, just don't stop after you vote.
-----------------------------------
I think, therefore I am dangerous.
Don't intend to. Worked in the non profit environmental arena for over twenty five years for substandard pay trying to improve something for future generations.
And here is some information light years out of the white inside the beltway/Hollywood scene: your Democratic and Republican representatives are now organizing the last Buffalo Hunt with regards the old growth forest in the pacific northwest (not to be confused with national parks). Soon these ancestors will be completely wiped out in our own country and converted into tree farms for the logging industry. People will tell their grandchildren stories about these great trees starting with the phrase, "Once upon a time there was a great forest..."
But what would Cusak know about that? He is too busy defining his work as Art and perpetuating violence in some of his films that create the mindset of anthropocentrism that will continue to diminish the Earth community of beings.
Chris, totally respect your efforts over the years and agree with your environmental views, but we've got to start somewhere and if we can't allow citizens, no matter who they are, to take stands to Start the process of turning this ship around then we're just going to keep steaming along until we stop and eventually sink. I want this country to turn in your direction, but its not going to happen unless the electorate becomes informed. You're probably right about the analogy. :) B.
Too bad. The nastiness and negativity is not limited to the Republican campaign.
Fighting among ourselves will set liberals back much more than any self-criticism would help.
Thank you John and Naomi for your truthful words.
What makes you think that Third Party voters are on your side? Obama represent more of the same. Wake up!
Since I can't take any more than 40 years of Republican rule, for this election I'm on the side that represents the 51% not the 2%.
"Don't intend to. Worked in the non profit environmental arena for over twenty five years for substandard pay trying to improve something for future generations."
Sweet, I am currently planning on doing the same thing...as soon as my papers for this semester are done that is.
-----------------------------------
I think, therefore I am dangerous.
Hey, Chris, why not give these guys a break? Yeah, they've become rich, Cusack from films and Obama from book royalties, but can you read? This is a surprisingly powerful article from someone I didn't even know was political. This article is from a guy who I've always admired as an actor, yet who still informs himself on the situations of the day. Ever eaten at McDonalds? Ever driven a car? Well, if so, you too are part of the problem. Cusack is extremely brave for taking an enlightened stand against our country's recent evils. You must know the kind of criticism he is in for from the unenlightened right. If he was all about money he wouldn't take the chance of losing it from Republican movie-goers who, of course, could villainize him in the same way they have villainized other upstanding Hollywood celebrities. He's taking a stand at his career's own peril for the country's good. And Obama? He's the guy who is wrestling America away from the neocons. Can't muster up much sympathy for your position there.
Being a raw vegetarian the answer on Mac is no. I have driven a car, but I have not owned one for over eighteen years. Hardly something that would link me to the status quo. Poor analogy.
The Forces of Darkness
c2008 OTTOMATIC
The Forces of Darkness
Are at your Front Door
The Dark Army
Is Camped on our Shores
What are we going to do?
When will they come for you?
The Treasury is Empty
All the Coffins are full.
They carry the Black Flag
Of The Corp-Pirate King
I see a Light in the Darkness
My Brother is near
He is my keeper
I shall have no Fear.
Put your Trust in Humanity
In our Grand Children untold
Unaware of the Struggle
About to Unfold.
I Pray for Forgiveness
As I protect our Home
I will turn away the Belligerent
While you save the Lambs
I see a million Micro-Democracies
Growing in our backyards
Harvesting Food and GREEN Energy
From The Horn of Plenty
Creating a New way of Life
A Self Sufficient, Sustainable Society
That’s what we must do
Something beyond:
Just,
Me and You!
Cooperation, Harmony and Helpfulness,
Brother and Sisterly Love
Truth, Compassion and
Patience
Peace, Trust and Forgiveness!
At least in my liftime, I think the republican nastiness started w/Nixon. The people who sold us GWB as the "compasionate conservative" wanted us to believe he was Ronnie Reagan's kindred spirit (look, he even has his own ranch). In truth, he was more like Nixon. But even GWB makes Nixon look like a flaming liberal. And yes,
War, Inc. is one kickass movie.
Thank you John Cusack for an article demanding that we tell it like it is. Democracy is a journey not a destination - and with globalization, we share the company of indigenous peoples, labor and progressives the world over. The MSM would have us think we are alone, the MSM is alone. They fail to peep under the airwaves and see humanity - journeying, greening and bulding structures OF democracy not just for it.
Its hard to see if Obama or McCain would be better at blocking progress. Obama seems more dangerous from the point of view of going backwards -- McCain would fail to "reform" social security as Bush did, but many people would believe Obama had their best interests at heart and let him go ahead (similar to Clinton).
Perhaps it comes down to whether these Obamaniacs give up when he wins or whether they really "hold feet to the fire". I honestly just can't see that happening. It didn't happen after 2006. But maybe.
I wonder how long it will take for Obama to become the new Pelosi.
… perhaps with the "hidden COGs" { Continuity of Gov't } every turn, a bushel of legislative blood is ground -- such that Pelosi is now so much less of the person than any of us could ever imagine -- merely air and remnants of propped up broken bones ?
How Obama leads -- may be more a function of how many Americans instill the absolute fear of their growing demands -- upon his otherwise agenda.
___ Have the belief, and
___ we'll begin to see
___ that which we believe
___ (( to be possible )).
Namaste
"As Sidney Falco said, you gotta give it to them, their gall is gorgeous."
After Sidney Falco was beaten to death by NYC police Detective Harry Kello, he came back as George Wanker Bush or Cheesedick Cheney, possibly both. On the other hand, Karl Rove is the more plausible reincarnation. J.J. Hunsecker came back as every Neocon in the United States. "Come back, Sidney. I wanna chastise you.!"
"instead of the strongest and best surviving, it's really the weakest and the worst" - It's interesting that you say this John… I have worked for two millionaires and both have been very weak in the knees. In fact, a few weeks into working with each of these men I could see right through their armored exteriors into their broken hearts. These men have been manipulated by the system and have been led to believe that the way to power is manipulative influence, degradation of their employees, and total apathy towards those fighting for what is true and real in this world. I was able to manipulate these men in a split second with simple mind games and I did this just to see how easily they could break. I have been offered countless opportunities and promotions with various companies sans a formal education because I am smart and I know how to get things done, yet I turned these “career opportunities” down, stayed with family and friends, struggled and started over many times because I needed to follow what I felt was right and just. I think the hardest part about living in our society is being able to find a balance between truth and food!
Miss Angell - Housekeeper On A Bike!
I believe in Angells.
Awesome life trajectory, and laudable balance in a world profaned by consummate materialism and superficiality.
I would expect that any that call you their friend, would be quite willing to provide you -- all the food and a place to stay -- for your grace and pure expression of love incarnate, through truth ( and inner beauty, too ).
Namaste
thank you john Cusack - well said
"As we help Obama try to implement another New Deal..."
What the hell have you been smoking, John Cusack? Is the bailout package that Paulson, Obama, McCain, Pelosi et al. rammed down our throats part of this so-called New Deal? Sounds more like a Raw Deal to me.
It represents an old deal: i.e., more of the same...
It remains astonishing that Obama will win and win big. Nevertheless, Obama's corporate handlers are the same people who have been running the global show on behalf of their pay masters as you name.
All the cheerleaders are in a state of euphoria (like John) but after the dust settles we can sit back and watch the enfranchised elite dole out crumbs off the table. Obama's environmental record is identical to McCain's. What we are going to get is Nuclear, Coal, and bio fuel with a few crumbs to solar and wind.
Cusak is in denial like the rest of the herd of sheeple he speaks for.
Perhaps you've read into this article much more than he intended ?
I suspect that John Cusack would have been much happier for Dennis K. to be soon elected, were that even possible in this twisted morass of immorality and not so well hidden economic global imperialism.
His words to me, are about the unvarnished possibilities of new opportunity -- no longer sullied by a pretender_in_thief of the office of governance.
Regardless, it is not by his actions ( neither John's nor Barack's ) , but by my own -- that the changes that I desire will come to fruition !
Namaste
"We watch millionaires and paid Republican hacks appear on television yelling "Socialist!" at Obama as if the Bolsheviks are coming to rape our daughters. These are the same people who oversaw the greatest upward redistribution of wealth in the history of this country."
I agree with this comment most of all. Not only have we witnessed the greatest upward redistribution of wealth in history, radical fundementalists have been able to convinced lower income people to act against their own self-interests. These people are so conditioned into believing that the "free" market will cure everything, while at the same time their jobs are sent oversees and their family goes bankrupt because of medical bills they can't afford.
That is why I think an Obama win would be a good start to change this line of thinking. These poor disinfranchised right-wing supporters are afraid of Obama not because of what he stands for, but for what he represents, that is in-your-face change. We can all play with the semantics of what that really means, but Barack will be different because he is different. Obama is made up of experiences other presidents did not have to go through and he brings those personal, racial, religious, and cultual differences with him. Many people, even some libs, do not see this.
Regardless of how much change we could actually see in an Obama administration, he still represents something this country has never seen before in the White House. Barack is a black man who took advantage of so-called right-wing social darwinistic ideology and now his success is staring at them right in the face, so of course, people can't handle it.
The best thing Obama can do is steer our country away from its "top down" ideology to a "bottom up" one. To wish for anything else is probably overreaching because it took decades for the Reagan revolution to implode and there are just too many Americans out there brainwashed into thinking that only corporate America has their best interest at heart.
Sarah Palin would be "different" too. Her background isn't Ivy League. She has had different experiences (or lacked the usual experiences).
You know what? Policy counts for something. Obama is a right winger.
Comparing Palin to Obama is like comparing apples to rotten oranges. He's running for president, she's running for vice-president. He gets elected, she selected. She owes her whole existance in the campaign to Obama. Palin being 'different' is why she is there, it is not what drives the McCain campaign.
Kinda seems to me that she is running for president.
Like comparing rotten apples to rotten oranges maybe?
brilliant... and not so brilliant.
Although I agree with your assessment pointing to some of the most egregious root causes, you make an effort to greatly distinguish between the two factions of "The Party, Inc.", and I find that to be either intentional or delusional. I would give you the benefit of the doubt, if there was one.
I find anyone who attempts that impossibility, to be part of the problem. Your proposed cure for America's ills, is based upon reassessment and enlightened change, but we can not achieve that if we refuse to grasp that part of the problem stems from massive complicity. It isn't one or the other... it's BOTH of them.
They are owned by the same masters. Obama played such a leading role in the latest $850 billion pillage that it would have seemed to me that lesson would have been well learned. However... America's five minute attention span is tactical... and perhaps you are affected yourself.
If we stay the course with Democrats, we are told, we will finally, one day, reach that shining city on a hill, the market-based progressive utopia... and Obama (our savior) will lead us.
"Happiness... We are all in this thing together!"
Like your future cult classic "War, Inc.", Stolen Liberty was a theme of Terry Gilliam's dark comedy "Brazil". I had forgotten how much he got it right, until viewing it last night for the first time in almost 25 years.
"The government's job is to create optimal conditions for corporate profit, to privatize everything in sight and to sell off its own body parts. To literally devour itself."
Gilliam's twist was similar to what you so aptly describe as the basic flaw in this country's politics, and that those "economies" would eventually lead to the epitome of greed... an engineered large slice of fear that focused upon contrived terrorism. And to top it off, he posited a service economy that supported itself by charging its citizens for being questioned, tortured and processed by the machinery that was fabricated to "protect" them. Yes, extremely convoluted, but we only have to look at the ground on which we stand to get an inkling of how it works.
I can not recommend too highly, that you (re)view this film... it was altogether incredibly funny and terrifyingly too close to home. Revisit the 1984 that is now partly our reality. There are several versions... the library DVD set I checked out had two.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=gilliam+brazil&aq=f&oq=
"...entrusting "enlightened statesmen and benevolent philosophers who would devote themselves to the welfare of all.""
My point is that you fail to observe that we need to trust ourselves more and not our leaders. We are the government... not the spinning Obamas who are firmly planted in the ground you reportedly despise... especially when through their actions, they prove unequivocally that they are "more of the same". Yes, slicker... but that should just frighten you all the more.
"We can all use shock and crisis to move the political direction of the country, but the progressive route is a democratic one, the right is an authoritarian one, even if it takes place within an electoral democracy."
I would agree with Naomi... but I would also point out that the Democratic faction of "The Party, Inc." is wide right of center... led by a corporatist war-monger and supported by the same greedy theives as the outgoing administration. We can hardly believe that they are progressive, except perhaps as a result of buying into the the way real progressives on the left have been co-opted and marginalized.
"Corprogressive" policies remain firmly grounded in the same politics against which you rail. You will have to work harder to make us believe otherwise. It is NOT time to sit back and sigh with relief.
I loved that movie Brazil, saw it what when I was a teenager?
I saw the version where and correct me if I'm wrong, Robert DeNiro was the plumber, that scene was sooooo funny.
Wow, I have to watch that again sometime.
Dear _ J O H N __ C U S A C K ,
Very provocative and inspirational
___ perhaps you have discovered the
___ pure GRACE to be channeling Studs ( ? )
as we so need his wisdom and verbal potency to scale and tumble down the walls of ignorance and corruption.
Thank you ( so much ) for a clear headed, well detailed, and comprehensive rebuttal to slinking despicable "beasts" of illegitimacy and once "glorious" exhibitionists of feigned freedom, those pursuers of iconic towering bastions of greed -- built upon the sludge of wickedness and wrecked twisted bodies of millions -- that can hardly be expected to withstand the winds of change and the focus of clear thinking moral people.
Please do take on more endeavors like "War Inc" and our current-sea of troubled waters of deeply flawed lies -- our taste for your words and thinking are demanding m.o.r.e.
Please do continue to take a "Point Blank" aim -- to blast those illegitimate scum -- from our respectful sphere of governance and re-instill the pure honor and courage to be of service to America ( and of course our world, as we're ALL ONE in spirit ).
Namaste « Presence »
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world » — Gandhi
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man’s need but not for man’s greed » — Gandhi
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — ML King
Based on his excerpt of James Madison I'd say he's been reading Noam Chomsky too.
man, the groupies are out in force today.
Oh, please. The US has been borrowing from China to prop up the war in Iraq based on lies. Fuck, Napoleon invest fake money when there was no real money left and that's all our current leaders are doing anyway.
thank you for this!
John Cusack, it's strange to hear of a celebrity who reads Naomi Klein and watches Democracy Now.
Is that strange? Are there more of you out there? Does Hillary Duff secretly read Chomsky? If you're out there, please, everyone come out of the woodwork, we need all of you.
Since you mentioned the New Deal and Obama, what do you think of Huey Long and Upton Sinclair's critiques of the New Deal as being a sell-out to big business?
"We watch millionaires and paid Republican hacks appear on television yelling "Socialist!" at Obama as if the Bolsheviks are coming to rape our daughters. These are the same people who oversaw the greatest upward redistribution of wealth in the history of this country"
Let's not forget that the Bill was bi-partisan with more Democratic supporters (including Obama) than Republican supporters.
“I'd ask Obama, do you plan to follow up on the program of the New Deal of FDR?
I'd tell him, 'don't fool around on a few issues, such as health care. We've got bigger work to do! Read FDR's second inaugural address!'
The free market has to be regulated. And the New Deal did that and they provided jobs. The government has to. The WPA provided jobs. We have got to get back to that. We need more reg-u-la-tion.” Studs Terkel
Franklin D. Roosevelt Second Inaugural Address Wednesday, January 20, 1937 http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres50.html
Thanks John,
Why does Hollywood sit back and allow this attack on our Constitutional freedoms.
They should make more movies like " V " .
The destruction of our financial systems is more proof of this sinister money grab by keeping us locked up in fear. Everyone looks over their shoulder for the lingering DHS domestic spy when they speak out.
They all work for us, lets remind them, and fire the unpatriotic spying traitors.
We must protect the Constitution at all costs.
BornFreeMen
The bottom line is really quite simple. Greed and conflicts of interest will always exist, With due respect to James Madison, he should have known this from the beginning. Alan Greenspan is a good example. He always did the biding of whoever was President at the time, Democratic or Republican, it didn't matter as long as he could remain top dog at the Federal Reserve. It wasn't a matter of collusion, he just knew what the Presidents wanted and gave it to them.
Since Obama has never been a business man, we can only hope that he understands this; hell, most business people turn their back to it as long as "business is good". The "dot com" boom is a prime example. The bright guys bringing those companies public might as well have been given a printing press to print dollars, but few cared, especially Greenspan.
Greed will sooner or later cause havoc if it isn't held in check (strictly regulated) and if anyone has a conflict of interest it should be assumed that sooner or later he will use it for his own benefit.
Perhaps you've not heard yet,
( 1. ) the Fed isn't part of the Federal gov't and
( 2. ) has no accountability to either Congress nor the Prez -- other than a superficial allowance to appoint the Frontman chairman,
( 3. ) which is always the one that the Fed Reserve Board suggests.
Namaste
Enliven! - "Perhaps you've read into this article much more than he intended ?
I suspect that John Cusack would have been much happier for Dennis K. to be soon elected, were that even possible in this twisted morass of immorality and not so well hidden economic global imperialism.
His words to me, are about the unvarnished possibilities of new opportunity -- no longer sullied by a pretender_in_thief of the office of governance.
Regardless, it is not by his actions ( neither John's nor Barack's ) , but by my own -- that the changes that I desire will come to fruition !"
Agreed!
If those of you on this comment board have actually listened to Cusack speak in various interviews you understand that his thoughts, opinions and moral values run much deeper than a few "cut n' paste" facts full of political jargon. John possesses a certain level of spirituality and self-awareness that we all inherently possess, yet some ignore... Listen to the pin drop, it's saying something to you;)
_ M I S S __ A N G E L L_,
It's my honor to clarify the message -- as far too often we all can be hijacked by our limited perceptions and focused attention.
It's taken some years, but I'm starting to better understand that what's clear for me -- is not so clear to many others. While similarly, what is clear for many others -- is not always so clear to me. Ergo, we need each other to learn better what we do "see", and what we don't "see".
__ 'There are none so blind as those with eyes who refuse to see … '
Thank you for reinforcing my guesses with your own more relevant experience -- I am encouraged now to seek more of John's words and ideas.
Namaste
Epic. May I be forgiven that I did not know who this John Cusack is, whose
political assessments are stunningly well formulated and easy to follow. My head
bows in deep respect, not only for this brilliant piece, but for the fact that it comes
out of the feather of one of my most admired 'Film World' Members of all.
Thank You for giving me hope again. I am not alone. We are not alone.
530+ comments on Huffington Post speak for themselves.
It's Just Karma
May all Beings be blessed. Specifically the weak and ill minded.
Bring America Back !!!!
**Yes, this is a brillant statement of our condition, and its causes being the base greed, corruption, and war mongering Neocons.
**BUT, if Mr Cusack reminds us of the Big Bucks that were and are used to push forth the Big Lies, then himself needs reminded indeed.
**Our Friend Mr Cusack--the Neocons do not need any more Big Bucks==they already made off with all of it !! Did you not just witness 800 Billion $$$ walk out the door ??
**You do know about the Trillion $$$ America has poured into the black hole of Iraq !!! And you have got wind of the hundreds of billions in windfall the Big Bush Base of Big Oil has reaped since Sept 11, 2001??
**Is it not a well established fact, Mr Cusak, that those golden parachuters==the 10% of America have and control 95% of the wealth of the USA ???
**So look, those rich SOB's dont need any more $$$ to push the Big Lies==they've got it already, and we have collectively bought enough of the Lies to last us for decades to come !! As Saddam would say, we already bought the Mother of all Lies==George W. Bush and Sept 11, 2001 !!! The New Neocon Pearl Harbor !!!
**The Biggest Lie==9/11, has already been sold to us by complicit Mainstream Media, and corrupt FBI and Military !
So much so, that , if Obama is elected he has pledged to mount a Crusade to Tora Bora to get bin Laden out of that secret boogieman cave , and do him in like the Dragon - terrorist he is/was .
**Does anybody still believe a cave-dwelling Muslim and 19 airline pilot flunkouts pulled off the absolute technical genius that was Sept 11, 2001 ??? Well obviously, the potential next President swallowed the hook, line, and sinker, and he's gonna lead a Crusade to the Afghans to root out the dirty little mastermind !!!!!!!!!!Oh Boy !!
**When Obama voted to immunize the Big Telecons from their felonious wiretaping of Americans--in the FISA law--he contributed to precedent for total loss of Privacy==just
the Constitution, thats all !! The corrupt criminal NSA, the Big Telecons, Bush, Cheney==they don't need to pay us back for the violations--and the door is left open for their successors to do it AGAIN !!!
****Even if the dirtbags needed more Big Lies to push over
on us little guys, they sure would not need any additional funding--THEY ALREADY HAVE EVERY PENNY OF IT THEY WILL EVER NEED !!!!
**AS KUCINICH SCREAMED AT THE CONVENTION WAKE UP AMERICA
*******WAKE UP AMERICA WAKE UP AMERICA !!!!!
The Grant Park Generation
Tonight as one million gather for peaceful change a new generation has been born and that generation is the Grant Park Generation. Its definition will be known for its collective effort to reify the words of George Bernard Shaw: “Some men see things as they are and say why? I dream things that never were and say 'Why not?
I think this frantic gibbering that is coming up on the CD website is all a byproduct of the most recent betrayal of the Democrats with Obama at the lead, the 700 billion dollar bailout of the criminals who worked under Bush's watch.
It is causing such an absolute panic in the left and yet again this panic is blamed on the right.
I find this human drama fascinating.
New deal indeed, what off of more bailouts? More war? Taking more rights away from the people?
Obama, we are all waiting now, and if, if you win, the world will be watching you and all your avid supporters, because the dream, the new deal will begin, if we are to believe you and them, on your watch.
But if you fail, there will always be the long winded and gibbering essays on how it was the neo-cons fault really.
Elites create the clubs which set the rules for everyone but the elites.
Today is election day in the USA, will the new leaders prosecute the old leaders for their crimes?
If the USA cannot or will not prosecute it's own criminal administration does that make them open targets to any who insist on justice?
We are speaking of Capital offenses here which mandate Capital Punishment. Should any just man on the street with a weapon have the right to gun them down?
Wow this was almost a completely emotional attack but you are right however, I think this model of capitalism has been completely bunked. I definitely share your need to vent.
Oh and as a biologist, I don't like the Darwinist remark. Especially since there is strong evidence that the rise of cooperative social behaviors can be explained by evolution. We probably would not have the capacity to work together if natural selection hadn't "chosen" certain traits. Working together obviously affords many advantages.
Probably Cusack's best piece ever, although I share the opinion of a few here who correctly point out that the Democratic Party has been complicit in most of the evils he cited.
I look forward to casting my vote for Barack Obama today. OTOH, I'm skeptical that he'll actually usher in the era of change he's been promising.
Putting things in perspective...
"This, folks, is the way of the world. Forget all the promises to make the rich pay their fair share. As the candidates get closer to office, the actual paying customers move to the front of the line." - Matt Taibbi
Like all aspiring presidents past and present, Barack Obama has spent the last year-plus going around the country (and Europe) making heaps of promises and offering his new vision for America - no surprises there. But if elected - which looks highly probable - are we really going to see the Democrats increase the top tax rate on capital gains to 25 percent, raise the top rate on qualified dividends, and raise the tax rate on most of the income of hedge-fund managers from 15 percent to 35 percent (all of which Obama has said he wants to enact) after he's raked in nearly $9 million from securities and investment executives? As Matt Taibbi rhetorically asks, "Why would corporate giants like these throw so much weight behind a man who promises to strip them of billions in tax breaks?"
If you really believe that if elected, Obama will stay true to those promises, then I would say that whatever lenses you're wearing are certainly several shades rosier than the specs I'm wearing.
What seems probable is that an Obama presidency is basically going to be Bill Clinton's third term. Now you may be thinking, "Gee, would that be so bad?", and of course the answer is "No". But I guess the thing that separates the Jesus people from the agnostics is that somehow the former are much more assured that Obama will usher in the era of change he's promising, while the latter see an Obama presidency as nothing more than a dab of gauze on a hemorrhaging jugular (at best). In other words, he'll be the same ol' corporate Democrat we've seen before. Only this time the patient is starting to look dangerously pale.
I've been reading articles from the 90's written by Democrats and progressives who were disappointed by and highly critical of Bill Clinton's first term performance as Change Agent (yeah, he ran on that platform, too). As I read comments from disaffected Dems and libs in "Off the bus: blue-collar Democrats ditch Clinton" by Jon Nichols from the January '96 edition of "The Progressive", I had a flash-forward to a day 4 years from now where I'm sitting at my computer reading similar comments from apostates who were let down by President Obama's performance as Change Agent II.
Here are some of those comments:
"There's something like 127 billionaires in this country, and as far as I can tell, Bill Clinton has spent his entire Presidency catering to them," says Solomon, who proudly wears a United Auto Workers Union T-shirt. "I counted on Clinton to deliver on a few things for working folks in this country, but he let us down. He threw in with the billionaires, and he told the rest of us to go to hell."
"You have a lot of diehard Democrats who thought, `This is the man, he's going to deliver,'" says Todd Loyd, a sewer-plant worker in the hard-scrabble southern Illinois town of Sandoval, where Clinton campaigned after earning the Democratic nomination in July 1992. "Now that he hasn't delivered, they're doubly disappointed."
"You know, in 1992, I told people they couldn't vote for George Bush because he was bought and sold by Wall Street," says Solomon. "Now people on the line come back at me and say, `Well, Clinton's bought and sold by Wall Street, too.' And I can't argue with them."
Bob Wages, the president of the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers, who indicated more doubts about Clinton's first Presidential candidacy than any other international union leader, now says Clinton "turned out to be everything I thought he would be and worse."
Patterson was a passionate Clinton backer in 1992. "He broke my heart," she says now. "As far as I'm concerned, he had a chance to stand with the working people or against us, and he chose to stand against us. He was against us on NAFTA. He was against us on GATT. He didn't come through for us on the striker-replacement bill. There's no difference between Clinton and the Republicans except maybe that some Republicans are honest enough to admit they're on the side of the rich."
Social critic Barbara Ehrenreich says that the President has worn out his welcome with a great many American workers.
"I don't think the Clinton people realize how deeply frustrated a lot of working people in this country are," she says. "There's a real sense that Clinton lied to them in 1992, and they aren't going to be won back with a campaign that says, 'I'm a little bit better than a Republican.'"
And we all know the rest of the story: Bill Clinton went on to defeat an aging, hair-dyed, vaguely-senile and permanently crippled war hero who was most famous for referring to himself in the third-person - Senator Bob Dole.
At least when all was said and done, Bill Clinton did balance the budget and even left a sizable surplus, so I guess that's something. But outside of that, what did eight years of Bill Clinton actually accomplish for working-class Americans?
There is one thing we can all count on, though: Corporate CEOs will be lining up to receive their obligatory presidential fellatio regardless of who wins, while We The Peasants will be left taking it up the ass as usual.
But at least with President Obama we'll be getting something.
Like I said before,,,,, when Greenspan goes bye bye, I will piss on his fucking grave!
Coffeelover,,,,,,
Re: Cusack writing about "630 corporations like Blackwater and Halliburton getting 40% of the $2 billion spent each week in Iraq."
How many of those 630 companies that are pocketing that weekly $800,000,000 own controlling shares of the Congress, the media, etc?
cflpeace