EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Endorses KXL Pipeline, Native Americans Forced to Protest from 'Cage'
Obama: indefinite 'development of oil and gas infrastructure'
Today, President Obama has endorsed a southern portion of the Keystone XL pipeline. "As long as I'm president, I'm going to keep encouraging the development of oil and gas infrastructure," Obama said in a speech in Cushing, Okla.
As the president spoke, Native American pipeline protesters were 'caged' miles away from the event.
Native American activists in Oklahoma have expressed outrage at the proposal of the pipeline as it will "desecrate known sacred sites and artifacts" on its path to refineries in Texas, in addition to the evident environmental degradation involved.
Local authorities have forced the activists to hold their protest in a cage erected in Memorial Park far away from the speech. "The protestors were stunned that their community, so long mistreated, would be insulted in such an open manner instead of being given the same freedom of speech expected by all Americans simply for taking a stance consistent with their values," reports the Global Justice Ecology Project.
#Obama: "As long as I'm president I'm going to keep encouraging the development of oil and gas infrastructure" #promiseofcleanenergy
— Friends of the Earth (@foe_us) March 22, 2012
* * *
BREAKING NEWS: Native Americans Protest Keystone XL From A Cage (Global Justice Ecology Project):
“President Obama is an adopted member of the Crow Tribe, so his fast-tracking a project that will desecrate known sacred sites and artifacts is a real betrayal and disappointment for his Native relatives everywhere,” said Marty Cobenais of the Indigenous Environmental Network. “Tar sands is devastating First Nations communities in Canada already and now they want to bring that environmental, health, and social devastation to US tribes.”
The President visited Cushing to stand with executives from TransCanada and throw his support behind a plan to build the southern half of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline to move tar sands bitumen and crude oil from Cushing to the Gulf Coast refineries in Texas.
A major concern for Native Americans in Oklahoma, according to spokespeople at the event, is that Keystone XL and the Canadian tar sands mines that would supply it ignore impacts to indigenous communities and their sacred spaces.
“Natives in Canada live downstream from toxic tar sands mines,” said Earl Hatley, “and they are experiencing spikes in colon, liver, blood and rare bile-duct cancers which the Canadian government and oil companies simply ignore. And now they want to pipe these tar sands through the heart of Indian country, bulldozing grave sites and ripping out our heritage.”
The group points to a survey done by the Oklahoma Archeological Survey which found 88 archaeological sites and 34 historic structures that were threatened by Keystone XL. TransCanada was asked to reroute around only a small portion of these, leaving 71 archaeological sites and 22 historic structures at risk. The group says they have asked for a list of these sites and to oversee operations that might threaten sacred burial grounds, but neither request has been honored. [...]
“The Ogallala Aquifer is not the only source of water in the plains,” said RoseMary Crawford, Project Manager of the Center for Energy Matters. “Tar sands pipelines have a terrible safety record and leaks are inevitable.”
“We can’t stop global warming with more fossil fuel pipelines,” added Crawford. “The people who voted for this President did so believing he would help us address the global environmental catastrophe that our pollution is creating. He said he would free us from ‘the tyranny of oil.’ Today that campaign promise is being trampled to boost the President’s poll numbers.”
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

142 Comments so far
Show AllI thought they were called reservations.
We didn't wait around looking for leaders in the 60's. Like Rosa Parks, we just took action. The leaders followed. Screw the petitions and investigations. Bust out of your cages.
McKibben was arrested in front of the White House protesting the Keystone XL pipeline with as much publicity and Hollywood stars like Darryl Hannah he could drum up in the Corporate Media. if you are just going to denigrate anyone on the Environmental side that somehow they did not go far enough, I see no value in that.
Have you been arrested for protesting the Keystone Pipeline, Wars for Oil or Auto Addiction yet as Bill McKibben has?
Until you have, I would suggest laying off the negativism which only feeds apathy and cynicism that anything can change.
As for McKiibben's Obotualism it is well documented, try these sources for starters
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2082
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-watershed-moment-for-obama-on-c...
http://twitter.com/#!/billmckibben/status/180369728496336896
http://tomhayden.com/home/mckibben-calls-obama-keystone-decision-brave.html
Yeah how dare I be critical about a Dim or one of their sycophants criticism is only fro vile Repigliecon crimes and always must be muted in a partisan way when a corporate funded Dim does the EXACT same thing, right?
FUCK THAT
The only thing that will change anything is physically blocking corporate destruction with out bodies and challenging the corporations handmaiden the state that keeps Native activists in quite literal cages.
I agree with your last paragraph regarding the need to physically block corporate destruction.
I would add that that is a process that benefits greatly from legal, political and economic support provided within the context of a larger populist environmental movement. The corporatocracy must be attacked on all fronts!
No the system will fall, or be overthrown like the Soviet Union, the corruption is too deeply entrenched for it to change it from within.
And why do you call me a thug? I have never hit anyone while the system you seem to think can be fixed painfully burns hundreds of women and children to death every week in the third world. Who is the thug again, and who a thug enabler? if you want thugs talk to the people here who shill for Democrats, Republicans or Communists with the blood of millions on there hands. Anarchism is all about non violence, non coercion and consensus based process that get the input of everyone.
orbit7er
Clearly, Darryl Hannah made a deep and penetrating and lasting impression on Obama -- her moral and political impact on his conscience has been palpable.
Obama thought fondly about Darryl Hannah...just before he began laughing hysterically and decided to "postpone" announcing the Big Green Light of approval for the Northern portion of the Keystone XL pipeline until after the 2012 election.
If Obama had any intention of putting a halt to the U.S./Canada leg of the Keystone XL pipeline, he would have just said, "No." Full stop. End of story.
But Obama didn't just "No." Instead, he played games with semantics and calculated delaying tactics knowing full well that he will pay no price with besotted Obots like McKibben and Darryl Hannah his loyal cult following of Hollywood celebrities.
If you're not filled with "negativism" and "cynicism" at this point in the disastrous Obama presidency, then you're not just suffering from "apathy" -- you're fucking comatose!
PS -- WTF is "Auto Addiction"?!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Loiterers" is what "Pittsburgh business community" calls black people who rely on public transit, and who must "loiter" incresingly long times due to the service cuts that the "Pittsburgh business community" supports.
pjd412
Allow me to unpack that bag of clichés.
The reliance of people on their cars is not "habitual" -- most people's use of their cars is borne of necessity for such things as getting to get to and from their jobs and the childcare center and the supermarket and the doctor's office and their children's schools and they combine errands to conserve gasoline -- and most people I know rarely use their cars for day trips and/or vacations for pleasure.
I live in a large urban area where there is no stigma whatsoever to taking the bus -- in fact, our mayor takes the bus when the weather is too snowy or stromy and wet to ride his mountain bike to City Hall -- and the only complaint from the citizens is that we want and need more and better bus and light-rail transit services.
Most people in this city use their cars for reasons similar to those of the mayor, such as time constraints and errands like trips to the supermarket and/or when the weather is too cold and wet and/or when taking the bus isn't feasible for a particular reason.
If people in Pittsburgh are such racist bigots and assholes that they stigmatize "black people" who rely on public transit, then why don't you confront them about their racism and demand more and better public services?
Plus, if you're so fundamentally insecure and narcissistic and self-absorbed that you dread being perceived as one of the "loiterers" waiting for a downtown bus in Pittsburgh, then who exactly is the asshole in this scenario?
Also, many people in this country still live in rural communities that are seriously under served in the provision of public transit of any kind and some places don't even have sidewalks, so your sweeping, whining, one-size-fits-all generalizations don't pass the laugh test.
If you live in Pittsburgh, then tell the "Pittsburgh business community" to cut the racist crap and just shut the fuck up! And demand better public transit services for everyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
jclientelle
Bill McKibben was interviewed this morning by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzales on Democracy Now! -- watch the video:
Bill McKibben: Winter Heat Wave Underscores Need for Obama to Reject, Not Fast-Track, Keystone XL http://www.democracynow.org/2012/3/22/bill_mckibben_record_setting_winte...
McKibben is in full Obot mode as he stumbles through a minefield of self-imposed dodges, denials, rationalizations, and delusions.
McKibben continues to claim that Obama "vetoed" the Northern portion of the pipeline -- when in fact the president merely delayed the decision pending TransCanada's submission of a new application that includes a modified plan to bypass the Ogallala Aquifer -- and, at one point, he even refers to Obama as a "progressive" president. Go figure.
McKibben blames the American Petroleum Institute for Obama's decision to embrace the Oklahoma to Texas leg of the pipeline, because a spokesman for the API said that there will be "huge political consequences" if the president blocks the full implementation of the pipeline. McKibben calls the API's statement "plenty ominous" and points out that the API is running ad campaigns linking the president to high gas prices.
McKibben suggests that Obama is so threatened and intimidated by the American Petroleum Institute that he may be playing defense -- but he does admit that “It’s tough to watch."
Finally, McKibben really pulls out all the stops to criticize Obama's "All of the Above" energy policy, stating that "It's not an intellectually very useful idea.” Ouch!
McKibben is hapless, hopeless, feckless, clueless, and delusional, and his mindless loyalty to Obama has rendered him useless as an activist...except for the Obama 2012 re-election campaign.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obedient Servant
Henceforth, I shall always think of Bill McKibben as follows:
Mr. McMiniver.
And I owe it all to you. Well played, sir!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Let the self-appointed anarchists and more-direct-action aficionados serreptitiously sabotage the industrial infrastructure, and let's see who has the greater impact.
But these self-described more-radical-than-thou "revolutionaries" seem to be wasting time denigrating successful activists rather than putting their bodies where their running-at-the-mouths are.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/12/23/ten-small-green-groups-that-make-...
Again I have been arrested for direct action, and lived out in the rain under a tarp for weeks at a time doing ground actions and re-supplying tree sitters so I most certainly have "put my body where their running-at-the-mouths is," And what have you done? Pulled the lever for some corporate funded politician, and sent a small check worth an hours wages to 350.org half of which probably went into admin expenses? Good job their guy, that really, really, really helped.
As George Carlin once said," we are going to have one of those really swell elections soon, and you'll vote for a President and then your country will immediately improve!"
SIGH!
Well, in 2004 I was kept behind a police line just one quarter mile from Dick Cheney's local appearance. Guess I had little to gripe about, huh?
Now with HR 347 signed into law a few days ago, your free speech will be constrained further, and obviously the president is testing the law's effects for more distance than just a quarter mile (as will all candidates!!).
And remember, in most states once when you're convicted of a felony-- as HR 347 so stipulates such protest-- you will be deprived of your right to vote. Neat trick, huh? You've just been disenfranchised for exercising free speech within camera range of a candidate.
“Barack Obama has done a little more than his predecessors about climate change. But nowhere near enough. And no movie producer, fifty years from now, will be able to resist a scene that explains the depth of our addiction to oil: the president coming to the state that just recorded the hottest summer in American history, in the very week that the nation has seen the weirdest heat wave in its history, and promising not to slow down climate change but instead to speed up the building of pipelines.
It's clear that the power of the oil industry drives political decision-making in America--that's why we need to go after them directly. The first step is an effort to remove the subsidies that they and the rest of the fossil fuel industry enjoy.”
"350.org is helping coordinate protests at Ohio State University this afternoon, where students will call on President Obama to stop Keystone XL, fracking, and other "extreme energy" projects. Last August, 1,253 people were arrested at the White House to push President Obama to stop Keystone XL. More than 12,000 people surrounded the White House last November to stop the pipeline, leading to an administration commitment to delay a permit for the project."
Obama just rammed an electric cattle prod up McKibben's ass and McKibben still loves him. Classic child sexual abuse.
This article shows the united front the dems and repugs put on for destroying the environment:
http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/08/environment-under-democraticrepublic...
I've never supported a lesser-of-two-evils choice, but McKibben knows that the differences in party approaches to energy are small but critical, as we quickly approach irreversible tipping points for our planet.
It is neither irrational nor cowardly to support small improvements or delays when the alternative is making things worse faster. McKibben has just as much right as the rest of us to make political choices, and he's kept up unrelenting pressure on the Obama White House on these issues.
Both parties are controlled as well as corrupt - 2 sides same coin. Without real mass organizations in the US, elections are an exercise in legitimating rule by one tool or another of the imperial oligarchy.
The Company no longer allows mass organizations to speak against the Empire. All such aspirants are relegated to the combine of coption, de-radicalization and destruction.
In this context OWS and the leaderless revolution is a survival technique.
Robert Riversong
First, critical analysis of Bill McKibben and the effectiveness of his tactics and organizing efforts is not "verbal excrement" as you suggest.
Second, you declare that you have never supported a "lesser-of-two-evils" choice, but then you issue the classic equal-but-opposite "greater evil" warnings that a GOPer in the White House "will more quickly reverse any environmental protections and accelerate fossil fuel extraction from every part of America."
Really? Such as give the green light to 167 million acres of new deep-water oil and gas drilling leases in U.S. coastal waters from the Gulf of Mexico to Delaware? Or open up the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas in the pristine arctic waters to oil and gas exploration?
Or those scary GOPers might block the EPA from implementation of new hard-won ground-level ozone rules? Or issue new mountain-top removal permits? Or worse yet, embrace the Southern phase of the Keystone KL pipeline with plans to approve the new application for the U.S./Canada phase in the near future? Plus, those evil GOPers would probably grant approval for the construction of new nuclear power plants, too! Yikes!
Third, no one said that McKibben is either "irrational or cowardly" -- those are your words -- and no one has questioned his "right to make political choices" -- but it is fair game to question the wisdom of his choices and the effectiveness of his tactics and his slavish devotion to Obama despite his multiple and serial betrrayals of the environmental activists who helped put him in the White House.
Thus far, Obama has stiffed McKibben on Copenhagen, Cochabamba, Durban, vastly expanded oil and gas drilling in the U.S. coastal waters and in the arctic marine waters, expressed openness to "fracking" and "clean coal" and nuclear power and now the Keystone XL pipeline. Does McKibben have a breaking point? Or is he a masochist and glutton for punishment?
Finally, McKibben's "unrelenting" pressure on the Obama White House is tantamout to a man who keeps banging his head up against the wall because he knows how good it will feel when he stops.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/02/16/the-rot-in-gang-green/
saucymonkey
D'oh! The name is Sarah, not "Sara" -- and I was not "arguing" with Robert Riversong as you suggest. I was responding to his comment and took issue with his attempt to impugn various commenters here by accusing them of throwing “verbal excrement” at Bill McKibben, and my response in that regard speaks for itself.
Nowhere did I suggest that Mr. Riversong was not “fighting the good fight” and I did not in any way impugn his activism or his motives. But that is precisely what he attempted to do to others in his comment.
PS -- I will decide when or if I'm "wasting my time" engaging with another commenter at CD, and I will continue to do so as I see fit. Moreover, engaging in civil discourse does not constitute “fighting amongst ourselves” – but perhaps you can’t discern the difference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~