Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Nalco Dispersant Makes Oil More Toxic to Marine Life, Group Says
WASHINGTON - BP Plc is making oil leaking into the Gulf of Mexico more toxic to marine life by mixing it with Nalco Holding Co.'s dispersants, an environmental group said.
A plane sprays dispersant over the oil leaked from the Deepwater Horizon wellhead in the Gulf of Mexico. More than 1.2 billion gallons of dispersants have been sprayed into the Gulf, according to the Deepwater Horizon Unified Command linking companies and government agencies responding to the spill.(Reuters) Oil and Nalco's Corexit dispersants combined have higher
toxicity than either substance alone, Richard Denison, a senior
scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, said today by telephone.
Denison yesterday posted on his website an analysis based on technical
product bulletins that Nalco provided to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
"Dispersed oil is more toxic than undispersed oil," Denison wrote in his posting. "The dispersant maker's own test data demonstrate that the combination of oil plus dispersant is quite a bit more toxic than the dispersant alone and -- even more significant -- the combination is more acutely toxic than the oil by itself."
More than 1.2 billion gallons of dispersants have been sprayed into the Gulf, according to the Deepwater Horizon Unified Command linking companies and government agencies responding to the spill. BP has applied Corexit from planes and from the seafloor to help keep the worst oil spill in U.S. history from damaging wetland habitats.
According to Denison, 2.61 parts per million of a mixture containing 1 part Corexit EC9500A and 10 parts oil killed half the silverside fish in a 96-hour study cited in a Nalco bulletin. Oil alone requires a higher concentration -- 10.72 parts per million -- to achieve the same toxicity, and Corexit requires 25.2 ppm, Denison said, citing the bulletin.
Corexit reduces total environmental damage, said Charlie Pajor, a spokesman for Naperville-based Nalco who didn't dispute Denison's findings.
"It's more toxic to marine life, but less toxic to life along the shore and animals at the surface because the oil is not at the surface," Pajor said. "It's generally less environmentally harmful than allowing the oil to migrate to the surface."
Nalco rose 44 cents, or 2 percent, to $22.50 at 12:41 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares declined 14 percent this year through yesterday.
Based on the total used so far, the dispersant-oil mixture is capable of killing half the fish across 4 square miles down to the ocean floor, Denison said. If diluted 10-fold, the oil-dispersant mix would kill 5 percent of fish across 40 square miles, he said.
Nalco's dispersants are approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said Tristan Vanhegan, a BP spokesman. He declined to comment specifically on the Environmental Defense report because he said he hadn't seen it.
"We continue to use Corexit while looking for alternative products," Vanhegan said. "The EPA has asked us to look for less toxic products."
Nalco Chief Executive Officer J. Erik Fyrwald met with members of Congress on May 26 to assure them that Corexit is safe after the EPA demanded BP limit its use.



4 Comments so far
Show AllI read the following information from a comment to an article a few weeks ago. It said Goldman Sachs is tied in with the dispersant.
Nalco, the company that manufactures Corexit, shares executives with BP.
In 2003, Goldman Sachs was part of a three-pronged group that purchased Nalco.
So Goldman Sachs is not only a key player in destroying the world’s economy and facilitating the greatest wealth transfer in history, it is now playing a small role in bringing about this environmental disaster. Corexit is more toxic and less effective than other known and available dispersants.
There's nothing that can be done unless this administration takes over. BP already told the EPA to stick it up their butt. Why Obama, et al are continuing it to go on means they are part of the problem and not the solution. Is their any doubt who is in control of the government now? Goldman Sachs is Obama's boss.
I knew that something wasn't right with BP insisting on using "Corexist". And now we know. They were using the stuff to deliberately kill off the bird and marine life that might be covered in oil and have them disappear to the bottom of the Gulf. This way the heartbreaking pictures (the ones we have been allowed to see) would be kept to a minimum. Where was Obama on this- to step in and call Tony Hayward and demand that they stop using this poison?
Why hasn't he spoken up for the press and demand that BP stop interfering with their access to the wetlands, beaches and birds?
Chessgame56 and free2speak - you guys are right on! I had voted for Obama and sent money/campaigned, but his bowing to BP in this catastrophe is the last straw.
He is one of the "Hollow Men", as written by T.S. Elliot
Gee, if it is more toxic to marine life, what does it do to the workers BP has in the area, the ones it refuses to allow gas masks and protective gear?
If BP uses the same formulae as nuclear power companies, we should see that workers in dangerous circumstances will be subcontracted through ad hoc companies that can fold in a few months or years when the medical claims start to get too high.