Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraq Orders Former Blackwater Guards Out
Iraq gives hundreds of former and current Blackwater employees 7 days to leave country
BAGHDAD -- Iraq has ordered hundreds of private security guards linked to Blackwater Worldwide to leave the country within seven days or face possible arrest on visa violations, the interior minister said Wednesday.
Iraq has ordered about 250 former and current employees of Blackwater Worldwide to leave the country within seven days or face having their visas pulled. The order comes in the wake of a U.S. judge dismissing criminal charges against five Blackwater guards who were accused in the September 2007 shooting deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad. (AP Photo/Marko Drobnjakovic, File) (Marko Drobnjakovic - AP) The order comes in the wake of a U.S. judge dismissing criminal
charges against five Blackwater guards who were accused in the
September 2007 shooting deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad.
It applies to about 250 security contractors who worked for Blackwater in Iraq at the time of the incident, Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani told The Associated Press.
Some of the guards now work for other security firms in Iraq, while others work for a Blackwater subsidiary, al-Bolani said. He said all "concerned parties" were notified of the order three days ago and now have four days left before they must leave.
Blackwater security contractors were protecting U.S. diplomats when the guards opened fire in Nisoor Square, a crowded Baghdad intersection, on Sept. 16, 2007. Seventeen people were killed, including women and children, in a shooting that inflamed anti-American sentiment in Iraq.
"We want to turn the page," al-Bolani said. "It was a painful experience, and we would like to go forward."
Based in Moyock, N.C., Blackwater is now known as Xe Services, a name change that happened after six of the security firm's guards were charged in the Nisoor Square shootout. At the time, Blackwater was the largest of the State Department's three security contractors working in Iraq.
One of the accused guards pleaded guilty in the case, but a federal judge in Washington threw out charges against the other five in December, rapping the Justice Department for mishandling the evidence.
The legal ruling infuriated Iraqis, with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki vowing to seek punishment for the guards.
Last month, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden flew to Baghdad to appease Iraqis with a promise by the Obama administration to appeal the case and bring the guards back to trial.
The shooting further strained relations between the United States and Iraq, leading the parliament in Baghdad to seek new laws that would clear the way for foreign contractors to be prosecuted in Iraqi courts. The U.S. government rejected those demands in the Blackwater case.
In January 2009, the State Department informed Blackwater that it would not renew its contracts to provide security for U.S. diplomats in Iraq because of the Iraqi government's refusal to grant it an operating license.
But last September, the agency said it temporarily extended a contract with a Blackwater subsidiary known as Presidential Airways to provide air support for U.S. diplomats.
The Justice Department now is investigating whether Blackwater tried
to bribe Iraqi officials with about $1 million to allow the company to
keep working there after the Baghdad shooting, according to U.S.
officials close to the probe.
Associated Press Writers Lara Jakes, Mazin Yahya and Chelsea J. Carter contributed to this report.
- Posted in

43 Comments so far
Show AllMore schizophrenic decisions from Obama's administration. As my ma used to say, you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas. Xe and the U.S. government are covered with big ol' fleas.
and everyday -- obama is looking uglier and uglier - as the spiritual and moral corruption in him grows...
if corruption and mendacity such as these wanna-be global tyrants and fascists could erupt like boils on the skin, Obama, Bush, Cheney, and their cronies would not be recognizable - they would be covered in boils...
PLEASE do not compare my dog to Obama .....!
Meanwhile there are many more Xe contractors in Afghanistan. This nation of ours, and I do truly love my country, is pretty damn screwed up.
Jeevee
Shades of Nazism! Blackwater, by whatever name, has further blackened this country's name in the eyes of the world.
"Iraq has ordered hundreds of private security guards linked to Blackwater Worldwide to leave the country within seven days"
...and head for Pakistan.
When are the three so-called "progressives" on MBNBC, Keith, Rachel and Ed going to start telling us about the vile history of American corporate imperialism and interventions in third world countries for the last one hundred and twelve years? Our imperialism began in the Philippines back in 1898 with the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Filipinos who dared to resist US colonial occupation...
Some indigenous peoples would argue that it started in 1492.
[Seen: A great t-shirt with a photo of Geronimo, Sitting Bull, Numaga and Oseola with the caption: Department of Homeland Security. Fighting Terrorism since 1492]
I want one! where can I buy one of the t-shirts?
http://t-shirts.cafepress.com/terrorism-1492
I bought one from a small catalog that I used to receive in the mail. I can't remember the name of it at the moment but hopefully it will come to me. If it does, I'll let you know.
I have worn the shirt a few times on flights and gotten some dirty looks from airline personnel. That was fun.
For those who like to read:
Richard Drinnon's book Facing West: the Metaphysics of Indian Hating and Empire Building does an excellent job of tracing US history from the Puritans at Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1630s, to the Philippines in 1898, to Vietnam in the 1960s.
Doesn't go all the way back to 1492, but focuses on unifying threads of racism, genocide, theft and imperialism in the vicious history of the United States.
I have that shirt. I frequently wear it and mostly get thumbs up, and occasionally a few middle fingers.
Time to invade Iraq! How dare they tell the us corporation that it has to leave their country! Who do they think they are? US solders killed tens of thousands of people in order for Xe to be able to kill thousands of people in Iraq.
NUKE EM!!!!
(the above comment is to be taken with a rather large grain of salt. In fact if you know what a 'salt lick' is, that's the size of the grain I'm thinking of here...)
1.5 million dead. 4 million refugees.
A salt lick is a block of salt, about 8-10 pounds of it. And is used to give cows a bit of salt while they eat the grass grown on the prairie...
That's a pretty good sized grain of salt all right. Brought back a childhood memory. When I was a kid I couldn't get enough salt, and even licked the salt lick, in the indent where the cows' tongues had worn it down.
I'm sure Blackwater will make sure to get in as many "suicide" bombings as possible in the next 7 days.
How dare these Iraqis determine what happens in their own country!
This headline on CD's front page is shamefully misleading. Yanking some visas (as if they mattered much in a war zone where mercenaries far outnumber flag-bearing troops) isn't kicking a company out of the country.
In fact, it's just the ones involved!
This should be followed by JAPAN -- saying
:"US FORCES have one week to get out...and STAY OUT"
and --- in a world of "miracles" - 100 other countries telling the 700-plus US bases :
"GET OUT -- this isn't YOUR land"
Oh dear, Xe may have to change their name once again or create yet more subsidiaries with nice sounding names like "Peaceful Defence International" or "Serene Windstorm".
But not to worrry, if worse comes to worst there's plenty of pickins' to be had in Pakistan, Yemen and the near future potential in Iran, Syria, N.Korea, Venezuela.....
well..if countries stand up to US corporations and US "court rulings" that way -- soon enough one can apply to American Companies guilty such corruptions :
"they can run but they can't hide"...if more and more countries, especially with pressure from their own people and fearing the WRATH of their own people (who do tend to be more active than americans are when it comes to such things) --
the USA will simply be forced to limit its presence ...simply put...Iraqis simply are a classic example of the "neighborhood" folks that were long bullied by a big "muscle man" (USA) and are standing up to him, basically turning the tables and even using the Bully's own tactics:
such as "visa restrictions".,...
"rulings", "laws"....as THEY see fit..and there really isn't much the USA can do about it, IF the iraqis are serious.
of course they are simply probably also playing a game to get MORE out of the americans....higher prices or "taxes" of doing business, and other things they want...
and WHO CAN BLAME THEM?..at the very least -- that's just DOWNPAYMENT on what the USA really owes iraq for destroying it over decades already, the iraq war merely being the most dramatic in "shock and awe".
I had a reaction similar to Mason C's [6:12 pm].
There IS less to the story than meets the eye.
Has anyone noticed the depressing regularity in which such "bones" are tossed to a readership starving for social justice?
Whether it's broadly encouraging reports, e.g. Obama "halting" torture, "resolving" to close Gitmo, a loathsome mega-mercenary like Erik Prince and his foul creation finally getting a comeuppance, etc., a closer review ALWAYS reveals a legion of devils in the details.
I'm rooting for the Iraqis vis-à-vis Blackwater/Xe, but this is part of a two-step being danced by the Iraqi and US governments.
· Yr Obd't Servant
are they beginning to see the light?...................
Hey, Obama, this is how you lead.
Hey! Can we here in the US tell them the same thing?!
Erik Prince . . . don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!
Will AfPak follow suit?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
What if Erik orders Xe to "go rogue" and assassinate the top leaders of Iraq to topple the government in favor of a different set of Shiia or more accommodating regional oil sheik-connected Sunnis!? Criminy!
It may seem like half a joke now but how far are we away from such a scenario when, until recently, we had 120,000 mercenaries in Afghanistan which was more than the number of U.S. troops?
In other words, when are all these private corporate armies intelligence gatherers and torturers going to start embarking on their own various foreign policies and threatening any world leaders (including the nominal political leaders of the U.S.) if they stand in their way?
they can do that, even succeed...but they won't be able to get "everyone" they want to replace....someone will always come up that's even more against them ..and wary , with an eye towards what the PEOPLE of iraq, AND the ARAB and Muslim World will
IF any of the 'replacements' try to let the americans go off scot-free...these leaders, if the americans put them in place - will be exposed anyway for aiding or "going along" with americans -- and these leaders WON"T be protected by the Americans ANYWHERE near enough before they will be massacred by their own people.
the assassination scenario that you are putting by americans will be far TOO OBVIOUS to the arabs...
and any of that kind of bloodshed against arabs (so long as arabs TOLERATE their leaders as the arabs perceive them standing UP to americans) -- will ultimatly turn against the americans who will THEMSELVES be massacred like no tomorrow....that's clear enough. the americans - trying to assassinate arab leaders by the scores for "regime change" again?
they would be turning themselves into sitting ducks...if their mere presence there hasn't already been enough to have targets on their backs that arabs simply are holding back.
doesn't matter how much munitions or tactics the americans bring...in the end they are at the mercy of the Arabs in their own land - PERIOD . i mean - all fingers will point at the americans...who ELSE?. and they might as well commit suicide or go home with tail in the their behinds before the arab populace is through with them AND their "munitions".
i mean -- the SHOCK AND AWE hasn't EXACTLY pacified and "awed" the arabs, have they? how many times can the americans do that before bankrupting the treasury for GOOD, how many times can americans try "regime change" in iraq alone with assassinations before they'll be MASSACRED in their Splendid Garrisons once the arabs wait them out, destroy all american Supply routes , and literally StARVE the americans?..
they'd be like sitting ducks...well..they already are...
the americans really, in iraq are merely being TOLERATED because arabs are too focused on going on with their lives and simply waiting out the americas who will eventually be kicked out anyway.
if it ever came to that -- can you imagine the EXPLOSION in the ENTIRE arab and muslim world -- syria, lebanon, even US "allies" - arabia, egypt, jordan..not to mention the Shiites persians in Iran - not to mention the northern Central Asian Muslims?
the usa - even JUST the us forces and presence in IRAQ alone - would be facing over a BILLION muslims...and it will "only" -- take - what? a small percent of that MASSING against the americans everywhere in the middle east...
they WON't Be able to come home...it will be a bloodbath the Americans will NOT forget for a thousand years.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
You keep ranting on and on about "the Americans" this and "the Americans" that as if I'm referring to mercenaries run by the American government. Mercenaries from all over the world participated in the botched Iraq occupation: South African mercenaries, Israeli mercenaries, Columbian mercenaries, British mercenaries, etc. These are CORPORATE contractors who do their work for the highest bidder regardless of whether that bidder is a government or a centemillionaire or billionaire or drug cartel or a gaggle of corrupt oil sheiks or just some corrupt Third Party dictator settling some old scores and trying to keep it secret.
The point I'm trying to make is that, in the post-Soviet era, the U.S. has made war such a growth industry around the world and privatized it so extensively and so sloppily that not only have the U.S. government's Pentagon and CIA become a self-incentivizing run amok war machine, but the number and size of the purely mercenary contractor firms has grown to the point where it is also becoming a self-incentivizing multi-national industry. There were more mercenaries in Iraq than the entire British troop contingent. That means as time goes on this new and massive mercenary industry will seek out "growth opportunities" in war around the world to maintain and expand the number of its lucrative contracts--and since these firms are motivated first and foremost by profits they will not necessarily hesitate to refrain in engaging in operations without any government's approval so long as the company's execs think they can get away with it--and look at what Erik Prince has gotten away with already. He's just the tip of that ice berg.
Multinational banks and corporations will soon surpass in power (and many of them will rival in military strength) most of the world's official governments. Some sub-set of them may, in the not so distant future, even turn on the U.S. government that helped create the "growth market" in war for the private contracted intelligence gatherers and mercenary armies in the first place. I suspect the U.S. government has already lost control of "its" mercenaries (by becoming too over-dependent on them) and cannot trust private intelligence gatherers for the same reason.
In this scenario it doesn't matter how furious or violent a Sunni Arab or Persian Shiite backlash is against perceived American assassinations of Muslim leaders because (1) the assassins will be mercenaries and may not even be American mercenaries, (2) they may be operating without the knowledge of the American or ANY government, and (3) these mercenaries only care whether or not THEY OR THEIR COMPANY gets caught or retaliated against, not whether Uncle Sam or other Americans take the fall for them. The multinational mercenary firms are global entities who have had years of multi-billion dollar contracts that enable them to metastasize and hide almost anywhere in the world. Several of them have headquarters in Dubai, no doubt, but they can retire so far out of reach of the "Muslim street" that not even a billion Muslims could find them if they wanted to and also had the plane fare.
Regardless of whether or not the 9/11 attacks were carried out on orders from the old CIA asset Bin Laden as part of an American fascist conspiracy or not, the Muslims who participate in or cheer on the Jihadis and Al Qaeda are thrice damned fools because of all the self-incentivizing war machines of the West that they've given American fascists the excuse to set loose now on the entire world--including the U.S. itself--for DECADES to come.
Those rogue war machines care first about PROFITS. They don't care if they have to drag down the U.S., destroy its domestic economy and completely militarize what's left as a Fascist State. That would be just a brief dip in their war profits until an even larger war fully engulfing Pakistan, Iran, Yemen and possibly India is launched by our Republicans who are just chomping at the bit to do it. Why do you think Israel is still so brazen? They know what's coming. If a wider war is declared then TENS OF MILLIONS of Americans would be fully mobilized along with the remnant U.S. economy in a military Draft. The last time that happened it led to the deaths of over 3 million people in Southeast Asia and the U.S. wasn't even really trying then. The American people weren't as programmed to be terrified of the Viet Cong and Khmer Rouge as they are regarding Al Qaeda. The mercenary firms have made tens of billions of dollars that depend on keeping wars going and growing: Crushing, destroying the infrastructure of, creating massive refugee populations in governments in a ruthless search for control of oil, natural gas, strategic minerals and other resources. Even if the U.S. government decided it wanted peace, by the time it reaches that decision the mercenary armies may be so powerful they may decide to keep the wars going to maintain their own bottom lines anyway.
The old Soviet Union paradoxically helped grow AND kept in check the U.S. military-industrial complex and the global economy. Now there is no military super-power equivalent to divert the U.S. from its own worst capitalist, war profiteering tendencies and thereby help protect the rest of the world from the U.S. Even if the U.S. economy completely crashes before launching a wider Middle Eastern/Central Asian war the mercenary armies and private intelligence gatherers may take on a post-U.S. life of their own and continue the vicious cycle of destruction.
well..you can get yourself riled up over my using the phrase "the americans" all you want.
does YOUR opinion or anger at how I describe it - matter TO the iraqis or observers everywhere?
ALL that matters to people being occupied or that observe they are being occupied is
WHICH COUNTRY and therefreo WHICH PEOPLE occupies them:
in short - even if I removed ALL other words in my comments...it will amount to
"the americans" PERIOD.
do you REALLY think the ordinary iraqi - who knows the ground better than any of us -- with his own knowledge of the difference between "corporations" , the american ARmy, the Generals, blackwater, Xe, all foreigners, politicians, the american people, CARES a hoot about what riles you up for the distinctions between "the americans" ,'the corporations', etc.?
all that matters to the occupied people is THIS:
"americans invaded, americans built that big base, they want to control the middle east, they want our oil, americans kicked in our doors , americans support these politicians we don't trust, americans bring these airplanes to bomb us, americans drive around in their tanks , americans have golf courses in that big army base, americans...americans. americans".
try going there YOURSELF -- and see if iraqis might remove you from the word:
"an american".
you can explain that "it's our corporations"........
welll -- to the iraqi - to the afghans - to ANY people AMERICANS invaded and occupied and undermined their countries through the generations..........
it is summed up one simple way:
AMERICANS. you are merely paying the price of what AMERICANS have done everywhere. you can dislike the generalization...but to the rest of the world where americans have invaded , meddled, and occupied...it is AMERICANS.
if americans can lay claim to the fact that to people everywhere -- if an american, be it from government or not, business or personal - behaves in a good way towards others, helps them , sacrificed for them even, - becomes a "generalised" idea that "americans" are good people.......
why should the OPPOSITE be offensive, where people will think "americans are invaders and occupiers?" because they sent people who ill-represent them?
that IS a product of america , u know.
so - i am not concerning myself with what YOU might wish to distinguish between the corporatists and "ordinary americans" from whom the corporatists and army TAKE their soldiers and killers anyway ...and THAT TOO is a product of "americans".
why would you then be offended if I am describing it in a way that is already what the world - where america invades and occupies - to preserve (as many americans NOT in the army would say) "our way of life"....perceives AS being "americans"?
is tht MY fault? is that perception the fault of Iraqis, or venezuelans, or argentinians, or vietnamese, or chinese, or afghans?
do you think these people CARE about YOUR distinctions between "corporations and americans"?
NO - they only know that FOREIGNERS -- americans came and bombed them and invaded and occupied and destroyed THEIR way of life.
and i can certainly understand the differentiation between the Corporatocracy and the "ordinary american people" -- i have wasted too many words on THAT subject alone here. so you don't really have to instruct me about THAT.
after all -- my own home country was a PRIME exhibit of how corporatist AMERICANISM destroyed that economy , isn't it? and do you know how ordinary filipinos back home would think of it? SAME as the others everywhere :
"these americans" PERIOD.
that does not mean they are idiots or ignorant or uninformed about the distinctions YOU wish to make about corporations. of course not. that's their country and they KNOW and LIVE the consequences of american domination...but they SEE that "these americans" live like kings in THEIR own lands.
they even have - what I would translate - an OPENING phrase:
"ang manga americano , talaga....!"
it carries a tone of disappointment...which translates..:"THE americans...really...!"
because, like with other peoples, the vietnamese, the chinese, the koreans, the palestinians, the iraqis, the afghans...they only see the HARM that was done to them in their histories -- by "the americans" ...
THOSE are what reside in their memories.
as easily as what resides in the crying memories of the Native Indians is that the "america" that you want to distinguish from corporations - is NONE of their america.
to them - it is no different than americans would generalize "these illegal aliens" , "these muslims" , "these terrorists".
but the point of this discussion centers of the CAUSE of what makes you riled up at my "not distinguishing" between the ordinary american or the corporation...and that is -- because it is a PRODUCT of america.
it is sad that conscientuous americans like yourself have to deal with such things....but that is the price YOU pay for what FELLOW americans HAVE done.
so - i you have a quarrel - your quarrel is not with ME nor my "phrase: the americans".
your quarrel is with your OWN country and fellow americans and with what - to the world - "AMERICANS" have done to them.
here's another example:
the Brazilians and argentinians...some high officials have said :
"With the CHINESE -- we can really sit down and talk seriously about our concerns....with THE AMERICANS....you could never do that..they always wanted to tell us what to do"...
it was merely a few individual americans - state department, corporations, etc...
but you see the RESULT?
the south americans put it all together as ONE:
"THE AMERICANS" .
a chinese worker paid low , even if, as a business owner in china on clothes said:
"of course i want to share the earnings better with my workers...but it is so difficult to stay open because THE AMERICANS want cheap prices"...
quibble with them, then. there are BILLIONS of those all over the planet you can instruct about "the americans" and difference from "the warmaking corporatists"....an american product
tell the billions of people affected harmfully by AMERICANISM and the "american way" -- that they should , please, USE
"the war corporatists" rather than "the americans".
better yet - go back to the Native Indians and quibble with them that "it was our corporate masters...not US americans that committed genocide on YOU"...
and they might say :
"really? you're ALL living the american dream -- at OUR expense".
i'll ask you a simple question:
do you think the Vietnamese, the Iraqis, the Afghans, etc....
say:
"the Corporations invaded us"?
"it's really the military,industrial/miltonfriedmanites that harmed us?"
"it's these privatizers that kicked in our doors and destroyed our libraries and museums and broke our precious antiques"?
hmmm?
i would venture that they only saw ONE thing:
"the americans came and destroyed our country".
quibble with THEM.
you know that old saying that our mothers instruct us, wherever we come from:
"be careful how you behave outside...people might think our family is bad"....
well....THAT"s the FACE of america , invasions, occupations, mass murder under disguise of "democracy"....war, exploitation, giving americans "immunity" from local laws --- to the world.
people everywhere don't think:
"the corporations of america, the bailed out banks, the newly-named Xe from blackwater, the privatized mercenary army rivalling the standing army:"
an iraqi boy that gets candy and a pat on the head from an american soldier...will say to his friends:
"THE AMERICAN gave me candy..he was so nice".
but then -- with the same power, an american soldier that kicks in a door and kills that boy's brother...will be said of:
"THE AMERICAN did it".
so why do you quibble?
no -- they only think about their lost loved ones, their destroyed homes and traditions and ways of earning a living, their schools, their children unable to play with joy and without care from being torn apart by bombs and munitions...
they only say - and tell each other through the generations:
"the americans did this to us".
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Teddy, you need to calm down and take a breath. You are fixated on America and Americans. You clearly don't get the distinction between governments and private corporate mercenary companies that operate internationally.
Mercenaries are not all Americans. There are South African, Israeli, British, Columbian, Russian, Japanese, etc., mercenaries and mercenary companies. Mercenary firms don't limit their operations to American military occupations or incursions and not all of them participate in those occupations or incursions. Sometimes they operate more or less in concert with a government and sometimes they simply take the highest bid from whomever will make it financially worth their while. That means they don't necessarily undertake certain operations with their own government's approval.
Some mercenaries are retired spooks and hunter-killers from the Cold War: Former KGB, CIA, Mossad, etc. These types have been involved in the heroin trade in the Shan States for decades. No telling how involved some of them are with the younger generations of spooks in the opium trade out of Afghanistan.
The point I was trying to make is that too many of these mercenary firms have gotten too large and too powerful as a result of America's post-Soviet wars and incursions and have become a self-incentivizing, often rogue war machine that is less accountable to ANY government than traditional regular military personnel. The Pentagon and CIA like to use them because the Congress lacks direct oversight of their activities and it creates an additional level of "plausible deniability" when the government wants to pretend that the Pentagon or CIA had no part in such & such operation. But my point is that those additional degrees of unaccountability are too great a temptation for these mercenary firms to start making up their OWN foreign policy and striking out anywhere they choose to increase their OWN bottom lines regardless of other consequences.
Blackwater/Xe's illegal activities have already blown up in the face of the U.S. more than once but I don't think we've seen anything near the worst of it yet. These are multi-billion dollar multinational companies and can create a lot of havoc in the world while being very difficult to restrain. We may, in the not distant future see wars between mercenary companies and the U.S. or other governments of developed Western nations.
Yet there is quite a bit of truth to what teddy says. Even today, more than 60 years after the fall of the British Empire, there are people who damn the British for the sins of their ancestors. The ancestors might have been working for the companies (some as mercenaries) or they may have immigrated to Britain after the Empire fell, but from the pov of the people who lived in parts of the former empire it's the British who are evil. They don't make the distinction between 'good' and 'bad' brits, they lump them all together.
200 years after a bunch of British soldiers killed four colonists in Boston, your nation's history classes still damn the British for the 'Boston Massacre'. In another episode of that war the Brits hired Hessian Mercenaries who weren't the nicest of people, do the yanks blame the Germans for the depredations of the Hessian mercs? Or do they lay the blame on the people who hired the mercs?
I do agree that the use of merc soldiers is never a good idea, warfare is bad enough without using thugs who are willing to kill for money.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Jeezen Croitz on a white pine crutch in the mud in the rain in Mississippi! Neither you nor Teddy get my point.
Yes, the U.S. has done awful, horrible things in these oil/terror wars and their foreign policy towards Iraq and Iran over the last 30 years is overwhelmingly atrocious. Every long-timer who posts on this site knows that.
That wasn't my point. My point is that these mercenary firms have acquired a level of wealth (tens of billions of dollars) and economically self-incentivizing profit motives of their own that may soon put them beyond the control of ANY government if this hasn't already taken place. They may start generating their OWN foreign policy as another dangerous set of players competing with legitimate governments in the global foreign policy arena. This will very probably lead to highly unpredictable and potentially catastrophic consequences. I don't know how to explain it any better or more concisely than that.
The Iraqi people are in a great position to put the heat on the crusaders/occupiers, and this they have done, by pressuring their government. Now let's support the Iraqi people in their bid to up the ante.
Trouble is, a ghastly US imposed governent, widely loathed, except by the Iranian backed militia, many oif whom came in with the US/British tanks, is probably doing this more as a popular move than out of concern for the people.
What a great chance, instead of letting them fly off in to the sunset, to arrest the who sorry, murderous lot and put them on trial.
Odd that the U.S. would "allow" the Iraqi govt to sentence Saddam to death but the U.S. cannot find it within itself to "allow" the Iraqi govt to even try these thugs? WTF?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Probably because Blackwater/Xe is heavily involved in unlawful incursions, assassinations & kidnappings in Pakistan (and elsewhere) and the U.S. government, rather stupidly, cares more about U.S. public opinion being roused against Blackwater/Xe by a sensational trial than public opinion in Iraq or Pakistan.