We Failed to Follow Bombing Rules: Pentagon
WASHINGTON - US forces failed to follow procedures in carrying out deadly air strikes last month in western Afghanistan that killed dozens of civilians, the Pentagon said.
A military investigation by a senior officer outside Afghanistan found "problems" with US bombing raids in a May 4 battle but it was unclear if the mistakes caused civilian deaths, Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.
"There were some problems with tactics, techniques and procedures, the way in which close air support was supposed to have been executed in this case," Morrell said.
The Kabul government says 140 civilians died from US air strikes in the western Farah province on May 4 during a clash with Taliban insurgents, making it one of the deadliest such incidents since the US-led invasion in 2001.
The report, details of which were leaked to the media earlier, marked the most direct admission so far from the US military that it had made mistakes in the clash with Taliban forces, which triggered an angry public reaction in Afghanistan.
Civilian casualties -- often from US air power -- have caused growing outrage in Afghanistan and tensions with the Kabul government, with US and Western officials worried about handing propaganda victories to the Taliban.
The investigation found that a B-1 bomber involved in the battle lost contact with its intended target temporarily, Morrell said.
"That plane, because of how it takes its bombing routes, had to break away from positive identification of their target at one point to make its elongated approach," he said.
The finding on the B-1 aircraft was "the fundamental complaint that was rendered I believe from this investigation."
But Morrell said it was unclear if the failure to follow certain procedures resulted in civilian deaths.
"It was just noted as one of the problems associated with these events, not that it was the cause of the civilian casualties," he said.
The investigation was "exhaustive" and it shows "the guys on the ground who are involved in this incident took great pains to limit civilian casualties, to target those who had attacked them," he said.
While Kabul officials put the civilian toll at 140, an earlier probe by the US military in Afghanistan found that 20-30 civilians were killed along with 60-65 insurgents.
And Afghanistan's top rights body has said 97 civilians, most of them children, were believed to have died.
Morrell did not say how many civilians were estimated to have been killed in the air strikes.
He said the latest probe found "the numbers in terms of Taliban killed and civilians who perished in this attack are very similar to those that the Afghan -- some of the Afghan defense officials believe are accurate."
The officer chosen to lead US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal, warned last week that the war against insurgents could be lost unless civilian casualties were reduced.
McChrystal vowed at a senate hearing that he would examine combat rules and tactics with the goal of preventing civilian casualties.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked McChrystal and the officer nominated as his deputy, Lieutenant General David Rodriguez, to carry out a review of military strategy in Afghanistan and report back in 60 days, Morrell said.
Gates wants the new commander to look at possible changes to military strategy as well as how US forces are deployed at a pivotal moment in the war.
The number of US forces will rise to about 68,000 in Afghanistan by the end of the year, after President Barack Obama approved more than 21,000 additional troops.
Both officers still must be confirmed by the US Senate before taking up their posts in Afghanistan, where US and coalition forces face a growing insurgency challenging the Kabul government in the south and east.
The probe into the May 4 battle, ordered by US Central Command and carried out by Brigadier General Raymond Thomas, reviewed video from aircraft called in to the fight as well as audio recordings of conversations between ground commanders and air crews.
The findings were presented to Gates earlier Monday in an hour-long briefing, Morrell said.
The incident began after insurgents attacked police checkpoints and local police called for help from Afghan and international security forces. Fighting then raged for several hours as US air power was called in.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
21 Comments so far
Show AllU. S. bombing rules (since 1789): if too many of the natives squawk, issue a faux apology.
Let's give the Obama administration credit for 'fessing up. Do you actually believe under W/Dick/Rummy such mea culpas would have been forthcoming? This is a start.
Please read _A History of Bombing_. Ironically, as flying and bombing technology advanced, governments and their military establishments learned right away that bombing of CIVILIANS is an excellent method of striking fear in any nation. So military realpolitik targets civilian populations. Yes, bombing is _terrorism_, pure and simple. Or do you still believe Hiroshima and Nagasaki were "incidental?"
Yeah, the occasional industrial and/or armament plant and military reservation are desired targets but to destroy a country's "infrastructure" you target civilians.
They pay taxes that feed armies; they breed soldiers. The "bombers" _punish_ the civilian population for these actions...
The Pentagon does its job and so do we. Let's stop the sanctimonious hypocrisy unless we're willing to join the Berrigans in federal prison or stop paying taxes that feed our military-industrial complex. Let's elect pacifist statesmen or remain silent in our craven complicity.
a few dead civilians on May 4.
Kent State.
these were perhaps commemorative killings.
What rules?
we drop bombs
They die
we lie.
If the Pentagon is true to form, they will court marshal a couple of airmen who fueled the planes that dropped the bombs. But never, never punish an officer, not even a 2nd lieutenant if they can avoid it.
O'bama, the bomah. Yeah, that sounds about right.
>>The investigation was "exhaustive" and it shows "the guys on the ground who are involved in this incident took great pains to limit civilian casualties, to target those who had attacked them," he said.
So how many would have died if the forces on the ground did NOT take such measures to prevent Civilian casualties?
If they truly took great pains to prevent such then is this an admittance that the measures taken could NOT prevent such?
If taking painful measures to prevent Civilian casualties still results in 140 dead in a single incident, then might I suggest air strikes do not work?
This is all mealy mouthed and pathetic.
The sick cowards once again try and hide their crimes behind words.
Bob the Co Pilot: Geez frank we lost contact with our target while we turned to make the bombing run. Is there not a rule against that?
frank the Pilot: You are right Bob...we shall abort the run! We are not allowed to break the rules ! Lets go drop our bombs an a school in Pakistan instead!!
Bob the co pilot: Hmm no rules against that is there?
Deepa
"We failed to follow bombing rules: Pentagon"
As if the Pentagon and the US have followed other international rules???
US has the distinction of being the worst violator of International laws. So bombing civilians areas is nothing new to the US. When torture is implimented (in Guantanamo, Iraq, Afghanistan) as the US state law (and foreign policy), it is but natural for Americans to kill children, women, and men of OTHER COUNTRIES for selfish interests. Only through genocidal violence and plunder can the US sustain the AMERICAN DREAM:
HIGH CONSUMPTION
COMPULSIVE ACQUISITION
INSTANT GRATIFICATION
There's "Bombing rules"? Like bombs dropped on a civilian population can somehow, through high tech sophisticated Pentagon computer wizardry, immediately discriminate between the intended target from the surrounding children.
Drop some bombs, kill some kids, (or maybe just burn off their skin or blind them), whatever, it's all in a days line of work. Go back to base, have a beer, call the wife and kids at home, go to sleep.
Tomorrows another day for the brave warriors fighting the great battle for, for.....? what are we fighting for? I can't remember now.
What a pathetic mea culpa.
"Pentagon admits that pilots broke rules"
"Pilots admonished...given two minutes in penalty box"
"Oops, we goofed again. Don't worry, no children were hurt"
"Okay, so we killed 100 children again"
"Won't happen again, we double promise"
"Parents bury children, but all foreigners"
and so it goes
Hey, if international law is just toilet paper to wipe with, why should they follow "bombing rules"?
McChrystal vowed at a senate hearing that he would examine combat rules and tactics with the goal of preventing civilian casualties.
and barackstar promised change we can believe in.
while back in '04, regarding what the american empire's actions were and are and will be, michael ruppert wrote, in his intro to crossing the rubicon:
- apportion dwindling resources among competitors, some of whom possess nuclear weapons;
- maintain and expand their control over enough of the oil and gas remaining to ensure their global dominance and maintain order among the citizens of the empire;
- simultaneously manage a global economic system, made possible by hydrocarbon energy, that is collapsing and in which the growing population is demanding more things that can only be supplied by using still more huydrocarbon energy;
- acknowledge that they cannot save their own economy without selling more of these products;
- control the exploding demand for oil and gas through engineered recessions and wars that break national economies;
- hide the evidence that they are systematically looting the wealth of all the people on the planet - even their own people - in order to maintain control;
- maintain a secret revenue stream to provide enough off-the-books capital for the purposes of providing themselves a distinct economic and military advantage, improving their technological posture, and funding covert operations;
- repress any dissent and head off any exposure of their actions;
- convince the population that they are honorable;
- kill off enough of the world's population so that they can maintain control after oil supplies have dwindled to the point of energy starvation.
if anyone out there still thinks this whole sorry goddamn sordid affair hasn't been orchestrated, including 9/11, then you've really got your heads up your asses and are in deeper shit than your wildest imagination could ever imagine.
read the book.
Here's the corrected headline (too bad CD doesn't allow italics or bolding):
______________________________________
"Pentagon Pretends to Promulgate, Enforce Rules of Engagement; Blames Persistent Air Support Atrocities on Goofs, Merry Mixups"
· Yr Obd't Servant
Pure pay-off - the statement of the pentagon is not credibly. The US military authorities always boast about their technical superiority - and now this pseudo excuse.
Truth is, in TERROR operations, like the ones we hold in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, etc, the objective is to, well, TERRORIZE the people.
Perspective: who do you give your money/oil to?
1) "I'm a perfectly sane, reasonable person with a gun. I don't shoot by mistake. Now, give me your money/oil, please."
2) "I am totally out of my mind...known for wiping out families by 'mistake'. If you resist, I will execute your women and children. Now, give me your money/oil!"
Who gets your money/oil?
Americans, people just like you and me
Speak passionately of freedom and human rights
By day.
They wave their pirate flag innocently
And shed compassionate tears
In support of our crusading mercenaries,
And sing at church of rockets blazing and of bombs bursting
While they pray.
Americans, people just like you and me
Send their sons and daughters abroad
To spread freedom-through-genocide and plunder,
Love-through sexual torture and humiliation
Good-will through shameless parasitical conquest
Civility through mind-blowing violence and recklessness.
Then, we tuck in the precious little children,
And the whole American family sleeps like angels
By night.
www.meetyourworld.com
That. Was. Awesome.
Headline should be:
We Failed to Follow International Law and the Geneva Convertions, again: Pentagon
Or,
"We O.D. On Muslim Blood, Again: Pentagon"
"...most of them children, were believed to have died."
COWARDS! May God reward them in kind.