Rupert Murdoch's favorite megalomaniac Bill O'Reilly sent a crew to Minneapolis this weekend to stalk journalists Bill Moyers and Dan Rather. This probably doesn't surprise you. And that's exactly why Moyers and Rather were in Minneapolis. They were speaking at the National Conference for Media Reform, a gathering of 3,500 people aimed at finding ways to get better journalism to the American people.
How dare they! So Fox decided to crash the party; smear as angry radicals thousands of good people who took three days out of their lives to help improve our democracy; and play games with Moyers and Rather -- two actual journalists who understand the crisis in their craft.
That's right. Fox News sent grown men with cameras to lurk behind doorways, hide in alcoves, and crouch in the bushes at night (literally) waiting to surprise two reporters in their seventies with angry questions and a boom mic.You can see this pathetic ambush -- and Moyers classy response -- here on Olbermann. But the attack-dog tactics are already backfiring on Bill O. because they illustrate so clearly what so many of us already know: The corporate media system is broken, and it's hurting our democracy.The O'Reilly ambush is typical cable news entertainment-posing-as-journalism whose purpose is to sell eyeballs to advertisers, not to inform citizens or better society. Add in a good dose of shouting, name-calling, head-shaking, and spurious guilt-by-association invective... and voila! Ratings points.The standard model for cable news has become ridiculous. The facts are selected to fit a hysterical narrative that arguably makes for good TV but bears no resemblance to actual journalism. It breaks every common sense convention of the profession.Rule No. 1 of journalism is that you don't write a story about something you do not understand or witness yourself. None of the three talking heads in Monday night's O'Reilly segment were at the conference they were trashing. The organizers of the event were not called or interviewed. The facts were not checked. They just don't care about that stuff.Is this what journalism has become? Really? This great country deserves better.The conference that Moyers, Rather, Arianna Huffington and others addressed was about the failure of corporate media to inform and reflect our communities and our democracy. It is about consolidated TV, radio and newspapers turning the news into sound bites, trivializing critical issues like elections and war, and failing to hold power accountable.It is a free speech movement at its core, calling for a stronger democracy. We want more channels and more opportunities for voices and views of all kinds.
Some of us may be angry about what the media -- including Fox -- say and do, but I would defend Bill O'Reilly's right to speak his mind and entertain his audience however he chooses. I would defend his right just as firmly when he agrees with me as when he uses his show to launch angry attacks on what my community says and believes.
By the same token, every American that believes in the Bill of Rights should demand that O'Reilly respect our right to speak and be angry as well. There is more than a little irony in watching him angrily criticize people for angrily criticizing him. What's good for the goose is apparently treason for the gander.
So what are people so angry with the media about? They are angry about many things they perceive as injustices. But let's take just one -- the war in Iraq. It is now clear that we are fighting a war that was started and waged on false presences. No matter how you feel about the war today, the nature of its origins is hard to dispute. It is a war that was sold to the American people with a coordinated political campaign -- using the mainstream media as its outlet.
This is not the view of a radical fringe of left-wing political activists. This is the premise of an expose written by the White House press secretary whose job it was to execute the propaganda campaign. This is the inescapable conclusion of the New York Times story exposing the Pentagon's years-long secret program to shepherd retired generals with administration talking points to better than 4,500 news interviews.
And this is the self-indicting opinion of Dan Rather, America's most famous anchorman in the Tiffany network's No. 1 chair at the start of the Iraq war. That's actually what Dan Rather said in his speech at the conference: "These [media conglomerates] are entities that, as publicly held and traded corporations, have as their overall, reigning mandate, [the need] to provide a return on shareholder value. ... In the current model of corporate news ownership, the incentive to produce good and valuable news is simply not there. "
He laid down a critique that was directed just as much at himself and CBS as it was at Fox or any other media outlet. Let's also recall that it was the New York Times that has the most famous examples of complicity in botching this story. This is a very serious matter of historic importance by any reasonable standard.
So. Yes, Mr. O'Reilly. You can find people who are angry in America and not afraid to say so. Lots of them -- on the left, right, and center of the political spectrum. Tens of millions of Americans are angry at the costs of war in lives and treasure. Tens of millions more are angry about how the media has handled the global warming debate, tax cuts for the wealthy -- and the list goes on. Calling them "lunatics" and "fascists" and "fringe" would be offensive if it were not too silly to warrant a retort.
It is the perfect embodiment of what is wrong with the media today that one of its most visible talk-show entertainers puts his own self-righteousness above the plain facts in the news. Rather than helping guide and inform the American people in difficult times, Bill O'Reilly has made himself more important than the news. By personalizing everything, he turns the media into a megaphone for his own megalomania instead of helping people understand why their country is in trouble and what we can do about it.
The people in Minneapolis weren't asking to silence Bill O'Reilly. They were -- and are -- asking for something more than Bill O'Reilly. They are asking for journalism -- a craft the founders saw fit to put in the Constitution. That aspiration stands squarely in the best tradition of American freedom.
Josh Silver is the Executive Director of Free Press, a national, nonpartisan organization that he co-founded with Robert McChesney and John Nichols in 2002 to engage citizens in media policy debates and create a more democratic and diverse media system.
Ben Scott contributed to this post.
Copyright © 2008 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
65 Comments so far
Show AllDrinkin' tonight purvis?
*plonk*
Now, now, Miss newton, don't get your panties get all twisted out of shape. Just one more question. If you could be a vegetable, which one would it be?
That the campaign for media reform is drawing so much attention is a good indicator of the slow turn of the tide.
"Well, are you a nice, Young Republican girl or not?"
LOLOL!!!
After I blast numerous holes in your stupid argument that the NYT is right wing, and you subsequent complete failure to even try to address them, falling back instead on your stupid Ad Hom coping mechanism, it seems clear to me that *you* are the young female idealogue. Stupid too, LOL!!!
Thomas More wants more?
Nope....but I don't want to lose my hot dog! Worked too hard for it.
But I'm perfectly willing to redistribute wealth accumulated paying 15% in taxes while everyome else is paying over 40% total.
Its like under McCains tax plan if I make over $2 million I save 260,000 something. Under Obamas plan, which is just restoring the tax cuts they would pay $720,000 something.
I'd vote for Obama for nothing more than that....if I could be sure he'd do it.
jakenewton
Well, are you a nice, Young Republican girl or not?
Thomas More wants more?
I am perplexed. If 90% of media leans to the right of the spectrum why is everyone only calling for Fox News to be shut down? Keith Olberman needs to take His silver spoon out of his mouth and go back to sports reporting. I agree that media outlets are over run back wealthy sources with an agenda. Is this agenda american?
We ALL have a serious problem that if it doesn't get fixed, our children will be in worse shape than we are today. The problem being that our Representatives, Republican and Democrat (Third parties aside) take our money and spend it however they wish. You can bring up the War or whatever else you want but the problem still remains and until WE THE PEOPLE tell or force our Government to abide by basic financial principles that I have to follow in order to maintain whatever lifestyle I choose we will only see the national debt grow exponetially and we will be taxed to death (ALL OF US). Pulling the spending rug out from under Congress is the only way to get our point accross. If spending limits are not IMPOSED, with the exception of national defense (and I am not talking about Iraq), we are headed into a long dark tunnel with no light at the end of it. I am the child of immigrants. I feel that a lot of citizens in this country will not wake up until there is something that literally slaps them in the face. Only I fear by that time it will be to late.
Our Government should not be allowed to spend whatever it wants when it wants. We are their bosses. Concentate on the Congress. The Presidency is nothing. It is a figure head only. The power is in the Legislative body. Take that power back!
What would half a hot dog do for anybody anyway Mike?
mikero22 June 12th, 2008 1:21 pm
"Revolution to redistribute wealth…what do you think?"
Great! As long as it isn't mine!!
This country is finished. Read the book: "Dark Ages America" by Morris Berman. Either that, or read the U.S. Constitution.
Another thing purvis ames, when was the last time the far right NYT endorsed a Republican for president?
"When’s the last time you saw Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal or Lewis Lapham on TV?"
Irrelevent. How do you know they even want to be on TV?
"it’s fashionable to be anti-Bush now with his approval rating floundering in the twenties."
Nonsense, they have been anti Bush since before he was president.
"The NYT was solidly behind Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war"
There was *no one* who knew at that time that the WMD claim was false. No one.
"and its own Judith Miller was instumental in promulgating the administration’s brazen lies."
Judith Miller was a *reporter*, not on the OpEd page.
When was the last time they endorsed a Republican for president? What comnist on their staff offers any praise whatsoever for anything Bush does? We certainly *never* heard such a thing from Krugman or Hebert, each of which gets a lot of space on the OpEd page.
"By the way, why do I always imagine you as a nice, Young Republican girl getting paid by the RNC to troll on CD?"
My best guess is that it's a defence mechanism you have in response to having your ideas questioned. As you mature, you will learn to simply respond to the argument before you rather than get distracted with Ad Homs or trying to formulate clever insults. You may even rethink your positions on things when you realize that your beleif is untenable.
Also, if the NYT is so far right, who would you call far left?
Revolution to redistribute wealth...what do you think?
jakenewton
You didn't answer the question. When's the last time you saw Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal or Lewis Lapham on TV? As for the NYT, it's fashionable to be anti-Bush now with his approval rating floundering in the twenties. The NYT was solidly behind Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war and its own Judith Miller was instumental in promulgating the administration's brazen lies. By the way, why do I always imagine you as a nice, Young Republican girl getting paid by the RNC to troll on CD?
"sad and worn ideology which I think all of you call democracy:"
Revolution for what? Replace Democracy, actually our Republic eith what.
"Right, the NYT editorial board is loaded with them, all the pro Bush editorials we’ve seen prove it. Wise up."
He has a point there.
This was my post yesterday which i resubmit since subseqent posts have shown even further the way in which the liberals, Moyer et al., convelute an already sad politic
of matching the so-called progressives against the right wing Nut-jobs. Screaming at each other about a sad and worn ideology which I think all of you call democracy:
“Nut-jobs one and all! I love that…â€Nut-jobsâ€.
Frankly ALL OF IT is a reflection of a seriously pathological societal bent which thrives exclusively on Pop Culture and Celebrities. Pop culture, of course, meaning that which we are fed as information and entertainment that sells in the marketplace called the Media (as an example). Celebrity-ism is Pop Culture brought to its obvious result of an elite of so-called professionals who have the last word and are always and without exception, apologists for the pathogoly we could call (if we were Marxists anymore) bourgeois society .
It is all the reflection of a society which has profit and vain-glory as its motive and orientation. And nothing stands apart, rises above, this corporate capitalist scheme of things. Liberals out there and so-called progressives buy into the scheme except if they entertain and inform us according to the only thing that is necessary in these times, which is mass organization of angry people sick of ALL of the Bullshit. And liberals and progressives won’t do that. All of them are hanging by the thin hair by which they will feign intelligence and objectivity in order to avoid the call for revolution and real change.
Put that up your pipe and smoke it.â€
"In fact, the views of the MSM range only from the right to the extreme right. "
Right, the NYT editorial board is loaded with them, all the pro Bush editorials we've seen prove it. Wise up.
Some of the posters here are still stuck in the manufactured consent mode of "conservative" and "liberal". In fact, the views of the MSM range only from the right to the extreme right. The right is called liberal. When was the last time you saw Noam Chomsky or Gore Vidal or Lewis Lapham on TV? Don't expect to. What you get is a former sportscaster in a Punch and Judy show with overtly fascist Loofah Man, Bill O'Reilly.
annieyoungmn June 11th, 2008 1:41 pm
"Why are you against Bill O’Reilly?"
I am no more against Bill O'Reilly than I am against Hulk Hogan. I just wouldn't call either of them journalists.
"Fox News and most of talk radio aside, I cannot agree that almost all T.V. commentators lean right. I feel this way because of questions asked, stories reported and overall general content from morning to night. The same stories are reported over and over with no new points of view throughout the day."
Chris14,
Look at who owns most of the media and where their markets are.
While I never watch TV news (don't have cable or satellite), the issue isn't which way it leans, the issue is that it isn't journalism anymore - it is infotainment. No TV news is news anymore.
And while many in print media may be liberal (though, I have no way of verifying this) it is obvious from the way that they helped to sell the Iraq war that even they are hewing to the center/right. The fact is that the media in this country is not, and may have never been, about "reporting" the news, but rather it has been about giving us what is necessary to keep their owners happy and well fed. Just look at media ownership to see who reaps the rewards.
Oh, and leaving Fox News and most of talk radio out of the equation is not realistic nor fair. In the Portland, Maine area, talk radio is FAR to the right, morning, noon, and night, almost all week and weekend. Other media markets are the same...or worse.
Thanks Molly J.....Mostly agreed there
"and the list goes on. Calling them “lunatics†and “fascists†and “fringe†would be offensive if it were not too silly to warrant a retort."
I've seen these same words (and worse) used here and on Air America to describe the other side, so we shouldn't be so quick to throw stones. These are opinion journalists.
Bill O is an idiot, but he's certainly welcome to express his opinions. Occasionally (once in the ice age) he hits a true point.
Bill Moyer whom I love to watch (and let me point out is a Texan) can have off days too. I was embarrased for him when he interviewed Wright.
So maybe we shouldn't worry so much what Bill O and Limbaugh say....I certainly don't and I don't listen to them. Something I'd reccommend as therapy for others.
Bill
Jakenewton, I agree with your point and in my post of yesterday, that is what I attempted to do.
Please feel free to read it.
"Apparently the far-right lunatics have sent a few Trolls to piss around her. bye you two little assholes."
I'd be more impressed if you answered their questions. Ad Hom anyone?
Ibn Al-Kundara
As callers to the Hannety show would say, BillO is a great American. He embodies all the values of the new America.
annieyoungmn June 11th, 2008 1:41 pm
Why are you against Bill O’Reilly? He’s not afraid to speak his mind and if there is a conference on media, shouldn’t he be invited? Bill Moyers had plenty of time to talk to the audience. Isn’t it only fair that the other Bill should have the opportunity to address his audience too? This has gone on long enough, liberal media supporting only one point of view. What happened to just we report, you decide?
ladybug June 11th, 2008 4:19 pm
So being un-american is synonim of being decent?
Apparently the far-right lunatics have sent a few Trolls to piss around her. bye you two little assholes.
Modechai, a pugalist is a name equated with, I think as far back as a boxer named Sullivan, pugalist = boxer, no Nazi inspired delusional analogies here.
To anneyoungmn: why would anyone in the right mind stick up for that ass hole bully who, along with Limbaugh, is a hack so-called journalist, and a lying bastard to boot!? Libral media? Excuse me, but last time I had cable network news on my cable (and I got rid of that shit four years ago!) it was chock a block with Bush apologist right-wing fascists, like Hannity, O' Reilly, Carlson, Novak, Norah O' Donal, and any, many more, including Chris Matthews; and now I understand another idiot jerk Glenn Beck has been added to the neo-con lineup! Only one voice exists that is anti-Bush, tells the truth, and if anything represents not liberal but common sense views, and he actually reports the real news: Keith Olbermann. Otherwise it's Free Speech TV IF your community access stations have it, or Democracy Now with Amy Goodman, a real genuine journalist who asks tough questions! So Annie: get a clue! it's people like you who make me wonder how many lying, obnoxious, idiotic things can come out of people like yourself,a Bushista! Obviously your views have been "Foxed up" by watching Fox, the Ministry of Propoganda for George W. Bush, Dick head Cheney, and the so-called Republican (actually Amerikan Fascist) Party. Know doubt you probably believe that the Russians dumped the WMD into the Arabian sea, as though American recon flights wouldn't have caught it, or Bush would have been making that claim all along after the WMD wasn't found. Even he couldn't lie like that! So Annie, just keep on believing the bull shit coming out of the mouths of Beck, Hannity, O' Reilly, Limbaugh, Malkin, Coulter, etc. They get plenty of air time because the corporate fascist media want it that way, because they love those huge tax breaks they got from Bush and the Repugnicans! It's your Constitutional right, and mine for telling you you're full of shit!
There is very little true objective journalism out there , most of the infotainners are playing to their corp. marketing guru's who sell space to the corp ad. agencies It is understood that nothing is to go across the airways which would put these advertisers in a compromising position with their product line. Mush is the approach, but dress it up with thrill.
A conference for media REFORM!! The media has NOT been liberal for a very long time, so hatemongers, warmongers, and general jerks like Bill O'Reilly SHOULD NOT be invited to a forum to reform a media that has become a tool of the government that promotes hatemongers, warmongers, vapid fashion plates, beancounters, and fools like O'Reilly. Bill O'Reilly on Bill Moyers' show? Get your knife and fork, 'cause Moyers will carve him up for dinner.
"I call for a referendum a motion that We the People should revoke FOX’s license."
That's right, if I don't like what you say, you should be censored. LOL!
BO had Kucinich on tonight.
O'Reilly isn't going to go away until his own sheep recognize the poison he's been selling them. With Iraq in tatters, oil at $135 a barrel, housing and the dollar in the dump, a $10 trillion national debt, much of DC and the media under the control of the worlds richest 10% (the worlds, not just Americas), and republicans now widely seen as responsible, one worries if O'Reilly might just be strung up by the very sheep he's been fooling all these years.
I feel sorry for them both. They belong now to history.
More importantly, Murdoch needs to be shipped back to Australia.
Kind of interesting to see who this post has brought out of the woodwork.
I have to say folks, I used to listen to NPR to get my information. But it was not until I started going to www.tompaine.com and juancole.com and tomdispatch.com and www.democracynow.org yes commondreams.org that I started to fully appreciate what is NOT talked about by the mainstream media. Unfortunately NPR is fairly co-opted too.
To people who think that the msm is left leaning, try to going to the BBC and the above web sites and you'll see that the news as interpreted by the msm is not very substantial. It is like reading the Reader's Digest version of the news. Oh and btw the person doing the digesting wants you to get information that would cause you to rock the corporate boat as little as possible.
Now I can read people here at commondreams and at alternet and think, "Well this is other information that is missing here..." but often we get a point of view not revealed any where else. It is, at least, a slice of the pie. But for doubters...so much of our freedoms have been sliced and diced and parsed...without nary a whimper in the msm.
Do you know what's happened to media ownership?
Do you know who the FCC is serving?
Do you know who has top positions at the EPA and other regulatory agencies?
Liberal or conservative, everyone of us should be totally in revolt about what has happened to media ownership. How many of us living in smaller markets can get any kind of decent discussion about local issues on our local radio station? Used to be if there were bad weather, local issues, a bad accident you could tune in to your local station and actually get information. Now it's just an unending stream of robo-programming that has very little responsiveness to what is happening in the community.
That, folks, is what media consolidation looks like in your life. Do you remember when radio personalities were people you saw on the street and knew in your community. Now there may be one token such person. Maybe.
I thought Bill Moyers did no worse no better than most against this stalking producer. They both wanted to control the conversation. They were not having a conversation; they were shouting at each other. But I would guess that Murdoch had his folks at the meeting. Can't imagine he didn't. No frontline face--someone more incognito. If you go to DemocracyNow.org you can listen to Bill Moyers keynote speech. It's a great speech and for those folks who were mystified that Bill didn't try to have a conversation with this guy, you should go listen to the speech. Moyers and O'Reilly/Murdoch come from two very different paradigms. For Moyers, journalism is about keeping the people informed. For Murdoch, it's about the money--making it and making a lot of it.
So their ability to have a conversation is limited. They already come at the entity of media from two probably disparate perspectives. I don't think they've always been disparate but in this environment they are.
I will close with this quote from Moyer's fantastic speech. Here it is folks...the foundation premises that make what Moyers wants from media so different from what O'Reilly/Murdoch and their ilk want:
"Whether employing professional journalists trained at prestigious universities or polemicists whose ignorance, arrogance and malevolence serve partisan agendas, our dominant media are ultimately accountable only to corporate boards whose mission is not life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for the whole body of our republic, but the aggrandizement of corporate executives and shareholders; organizations whose self-styled mandate is not holding public and private power accountable so that there is an equilibrium in society, but aggregating their interlocking interests; organizations whose reward comes not from helping fulfill the social compact embodied in the notion of “We, the people,†but from the manufacturing of news and information as profitable consumer commodities, rather than the means to empower morally responsible citizens."
Murdoch is a puppy dog compared to how Hillary Clinton was - did you see this yet?
http://www.minimovie.com/film-128295-Welcome%20Back,%20Clinton
In the attempted ambush, Bill Moyers called O'Reilly "a pugilist". This is a diplomatic and somewhat humorous way of calling him Horst Wessel, the nazi street thug and brawler killed in a fight and later the subject of a famous nazi anthem. ALL figures of the American far right propaganda blitzkrieg, male or female, are these kinds of thugs - forever red in the face, screaming, cascading droplets of white hot bile and spittle from their pie holes. And you can reduce everything they say to one word: KILL.
Speaking as an Australian, let me apologize to the American people for the actions of Australian-born Murdoch. He is a megalomaniac, a greedy one at that.
Of course, there are many like him in the capitalist world. It breeds them, you know! Then America is the home of capitalism, isn't it?
Should the Three Wise Monkeys be shot? Check my blog.
www.dangerouscreation.com
It is too bad Bill Moyers did not run for President in the Democratic Party. Bill is still one Democrat along with Kucinich that I still respect. And one man who would have made one HELL OF A PRESIDENT!
Instead we get Little Barack and his inside the beltway friends like Johnson who just resigned today.
I thought Obama was bringing a NEW type of politic to Washington instead what we get IS MORE OF THE SAME.
When will the sheeple wake up?
I unpluged my television. Is that un-American, anti-Sematic or simple sanity?
I call for a referendum a motion that We the People should revoke FOX's license.
When I subscribed to pay t.v.( I cancelled it years ago:it was becoming a groundhog day experience),I used to watch the O'Reilly rant for its' entertainment value.Similar to World Wide Wrestling...i.e. bullshit and bluster.
These days are different.With so many lives lost as a result of blatent dishonesty and the screwing-up of the American "mind",there is no longer any element of humour in this type of journalism,just shame.
Nut-jobs one and all! I love that..."Nut-jobs".
Frankly all of it is a reflection of a seriously pathological societal bent which thrives exclusivly on Pop Culture and Celebrities. Pop culture, of course, meaning that which we are fed as information and entertainment that sells in the marketplace called the Media (as an example). Celebrity-ism is Pop Culture brought to its obvious result of an elite of so-called professionals who have the last word and are always and without exception, apologists for the pathogoly we could call (if we were Marxists anymore) bourgoise society .
It is all the reflection of a society which has fame and profit and vain-glory as its motive and orientation. And nothing stands apart, rises above, this corporate capatalist scheme of things. Liberals out there and so-called progressives buy into the scheme except if they entertain and inform us according to the only thing that is necessary in these times. Which is mass organization of angry people sick of ALL of the Bullshit. And liberals and progressives won't do that. All of them are hanging by the hair by which they will feign intelligence and objectivity in order to avoid the call for revolution and real change.
Put that up your pipe and smoke it.
BALAKIREV & THINK FOR YOURSELF: Excellent posts.
CHRIS 14: I believe the 2 posters I mention above answered your post, however, is it possible you missed the story about the embedding of retired and other generals in news rooms to FRAME the debate in FAVOR of war? Have you heard of FAIR? It's an organization that CHARTS actual stories to show their left or right bias. It's about 90 (right) to 10. True, too, that Bill Clinton moved the democratic party to the right (all that centrist nonsense) so that what PASSES for left by some is basically a fairly right of center position. Do you know what happened to Phil Donahue? To any voices, even those in the music world, that tried to oppose the war? When 95% of the media goes along with a war, itself FIXED on false data/evidence, the case MADE for war... and the necessary questions are NOT asked, that hardly suggests anything remotely liberal or progressive in media.
Bill O'Reilly is an Enemy Combatant
"Fox decided to crash the party; smear as angry radicals thousands of good people who took three days out of their lives to help improve our democracy..."
That the label angry (lefty) radical is seen as a smear even by the author is evidence of a sick political culture. The nationalist politicians, government and media are the true radicals of our era. Any left leaning activist hoping to work for change understands the corruption of electoral politics and works locally. God help us when the O'Reilly's and their ilk find out about community organizers. No, help us now.
So being un-american is synonim of being decent?
Annnieyoungmn:
God protect us from fools and patriots!
Keith Olbermann is the lone liberal anchor on MSNBC.
Then there is Air America.
The Nation is just slightly liberal.
Bill Moyers is center.
MSNBC has quite a few right wing nut jobs.
90% of MSNBC coverage is right wing.
The New York Times is decidedly right wing.
I could run out of space listing right wing media, but I can only think or 3 left of center programs or publications.
Perhaps chris14 can list some media and I will let him know if they are really right wing.
The media is out of control this election has shown us just how far it has gone to dumb-down the public. The recent move by ABC to remove candidates from the debates was outrageous. They are trying to determine the fate of the country and the world being mouthpiece for special interests and the government and to silence dissent.
Media censure is unheard, the FCC should rule for the public but like the EPA its teeth are continually drawn. The media has no right to exclude any politician who is running for office as happened recently with the ABC debate. The only exclusion under the rules used by ABC should apply to a candidate not sitting in public office. The license of ABC would be lifted if the rules were changed but the congress, with the exception of a few pushes for more media conglomeration supported by special interests. I hope that someone picks up on this thought. We have seen the obsession by FOX and CNN, particularly in the form of Wolf Blitzer, and the FOX rabid journalists constantly referring to the Rev. Wright controversy recently to obscure so many important issues.
Blitzer’s bias is clear. He is quick to use every possible negative he can against Obama from the Flag Pin to anything else he could get his mouth around. His support for Clinton became clear and inappropriate, for CNN to call itself a “fair and balanced†news network. It has become the medias roll to try to change public perception through obfuscation and misquotes. The Bill O, Reilly no nonsense is another example of media present day rubbish. I quote recent statement by Mr. Nichols:
†The media pretense of being a fly on the wall has often been preposterous. In the real world of politics — where power brokers and manipulators proceed with the cynical axiom that perception is reality — the fly on the wall is the wall. The political press corps is not observing reality as much as redefining it while obstructing outlooks and constraining public perceptions.â€
As usual, few are able to see the stampede of the public sheep created by media. I support the change that Obama represents! He is intelligent and wants America once again to be looked upon as a great nation that it could still be and once was.
The media who carries their continued assault against progressive ideas and those, who would in any way, attempt to bring different thinking to bear on the so called "American Dream" which has become the world's nightmare.
The media must begin to understand its roll as an objective commentator to the necessary changes that must be made to the USA and the world if humanity is to survive. It above all must also be changed to once again give exposure to ideas that facilitate understanding of complex thought on complex issues. A departure from the simplistic superficial treatment ad-nauseam we witness which passes for news.
Media censure is unheard, the FCC should rule for the public but like the EPA its teeth are continually drawn. The media has no right to exclude any politician who is running for office as happened recently with the ABC debate. The ABC's license would be lifted if the rules were changed but the congress, with the exception of a few push for more media conglomeration supported by special interests. I hope that someone picks up on this thought. We have seen the obsession by FOX and CNN, and others in the form of Wolf Blitzer, and the FOX rabid journalists constantly referring to the Rev. Wright controversy.
A flight from entrenched American politics is necessary . . .it has ruined this country and made greed the single value of importance. The young people once again embrace hope as a result of the Obama campaign.
Mr. Gore Vidal, has pointedly criticized mainstream media as one of the major problems, and what is wrong with the USA. The corporate media conglomerates control the message and that message is perversely distorted and panders to its advertising portfolio! Wolf Blitzer one of the glaring examples of this criticism and shows clearly those distorted ideas with his reporting, which is nothing more than partially factual opinion dictated by his bosses.
Blitzer, CNN and the mainstream media have no right to shape public opinion far from being the “fly on the wall†they and the fashion club of female journalists espouses to be they are opinionated lacking in depth. We must remember flies morph from media maggots that the media advertising dollars bloat. These so-called journalists display ignorance as a virtue for the entire world to see, an example of what is considered, by many in America to be news reporting.
If Blitzer and his bunch were billed as a CNN commentator, at least the public would not be hoodwinked to believe their reporting to be the truth, while in fact its lack of concern for accuracy, rectitude and fairness is to surface be considered to be news rather than opinion.
The people of the USA have been so ill informed as to what a change would really do and mean to this country and the change in leadership that is necessary, they have forgotten how to really form an opinion based on fact. A flight from entrenched American politics is necessary . . . it has ruined this country and made greed the single value of importance but no such discussion is ever enjoined in this media. Israel has dropped CNN in favor of Al Jazerza this is the state of American media.
The future leaders, Obama or McCain, should discuss the problems America and the world faces. The problem of public ignorance of the issues caused by the media is serious. In the heat of elections the media panders to voter ignorance in fact creates voter ignorance to promote the wishes of its corporate masters.
Rupert Murdoch, GE, Ted Turner and his self-satisfied belief in truth!
The emphasis, as we see on nightly, so-called news, is constant repetition of candidate’s miscues. The result of the media sensationalism becomes, the wrong problem and the wrong message at a crucial time in world history. The emphasis on having the politicians address a credible platform of ideas based on an American and global interaction in the world is critical but this is not the direction US media takes.
There is not enough time left for civilization to focus on rubbish. The energy and environmental issues for example or food and health care are the problems the media should be focusing upon. But to use the Rev, Wright issue for one week, to try and hurt the candidacy of Obama is a travesty. This shows journalism to be what it is as Rather and Bill Moyers understand.
The issues most pressing are once again avoided in present news reporting, those really important issues that must be put before the public who chooses the congress; issues of environment, continued funding of Iraq, energy issues, education, health care, food, global toxicity and so many others not dealt with, all impacting upon the economy and human survival and its state of being, is the failure of public dialog as a result of the current media. . .it is outrageous!
The issue of this election will impact on the environment, economy and the future of the USA as no others. Still, if more than 50% of eligible voters cast their votes it will be a miracle, as a result of regressive US election laws and media obfuscation. It is compulsory for everyone to vote as in Australia it should be so in the USA as well. Few of the candidates are really talking about the major points, even those who are the most erudite, because of the media rules that should be changed in congress, but again its the special interests that control the rules.
The environment in association with the economy or health care and elections reform, to name some, are kept out of public dialog as a result of the nonsense punditry hours on end which is supposed to bring the issues before the public. Donna Brazil is whom we have to rely on to tell us if the world is on the precipice to extinction. The world looks at America and its “star struck reality†in wonder.
The “American Dream†has caused endless abuses to its population, with the false promise of fame and riches that are legend, supported by the Hollywood myth and media indoctrination.
The claim that anyone can be president is manifold. However by some fluke of chance and hard work a man has come along that somehow defied conventional wisdom and possibility. He has made the inroads into populist thinking. However the media does not question him on the environment or the lack of depth of his chosen economist.
The political discussion rests on the complete lack of talking points in isolation. The candidates for the US presidency rarely talk about the complete interrelated package of the issues combined. Obama, alludes to this deficiency in the media and public issues. When he asks for this to occur it lands on deaf ears because the media and special interests do not want this to occur.
Welcome to American politics and their values as represented by the useless thinking of the American media. Between Russet’s baseball questions and Blitzer’s right wing empty questions, we begin to understand some of the reasons why the American public is considered empty by Europeans standards.
The media reduces the public debate to its most simplistic level with pundits arguing about one inconsequential issue or another rather than the truly important issues of our time. The American people are kept from hearing and understanding the relationship of the entire package of issues, which a true leader must address and deal with for the very survival of America in the world within a global economy. The costs for the war would pay for every single need from health care to American infrastructure repair and education, as well as the alleviation of world hunger and energy research this is what is what is at stake. The media however, deals with Rev. Wright and American Flag lapel pins instead.
A major revaluation of human ethics and goals, in terms of the capitalist ethic and globalization are necessary. The system has gone out of balance we need only look at climate change, one of its prime examples, to know that human survival and the further development of the species is in jeopardy as a result of an economic system out of control. However the media obsessed with Wall Street and their own 401Ks is not interested with the problems of the system that is in opposition to the values of the media boardrooms who support the system in lock-step!
The media keeps the public dumbed down for obvious reasons they represent the moneyed people. As a result the public becomes unable to talk about moving radically toward change and the related issues affecting their very lives and the future. The issues of climate change, energy issues and the global economy not only American economy is the part of the mortgage crisis created by the “free market†system. All the other issues like people losing their homes as a result of Wall Street manipulation are tied to these fundamental problems. These are the first and major issues, which affects all other issues and is completely related to the economic changes, which must take place.
The media board rooms instruct their so-called journalists (news/opinion readers) to stay clear of those subjects that would attack advertising, consumption, tied together in the media collusion with special interests to maintain the consumer system killing the world. Media in collusion with government does not want the changes that would result in the decline of there hundreds of millions of dollars in profits.
All environmental problems are in one way or another associated with the Western world’s consumption based lifestyle led by the USA. These issues are affected by consumer advertising much of it coming from the millions spent on advertising of irrelevant product and campaign advertising. The media should be dealing with true American and global issues in this campaign affecting the very basis of the so-called American Dream, fast becoming the global nightmare. This is what the next president of the USA must address
Thought Shamen sez:
Liberal media - What liberal media? Other than occasional shows like Olbermann’s Countdown, much of the main stream media is right-wing or centrist. I am waiting for the decent liberal or progressive change to occur.
*****************
It exists, try the following:
democracynow.org
alternativeradio.org
Making contact at: http://www.radioproject.org/about
Between the Lines at: http://www.btlonline.org/
Counterspin at: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3
TUC Radio at: http://www.tucradio.org/
Free Speech Radio News at: http://www.fsrn.org/
Radio Ecoshock: http://www.ecoshock.org/
KPFA at: http://www.kpfa.org/
(Especially the Morning Show, Guns and Butter, Flashpoints, and Informed Disent--all are archived)
KEXP at:
http://www.kexp.org/streamarchive/streamarchive.asp
(listen to Mind Over Matters a three hour public affairs program on Saturday and Sunday from 6-9AM Pacific Time or listen to the archived shows at your convienience)
KGNU at: http://www.kgnu.org/ht/listencomp.html
Happy viewing and listening and don't forget to contribute to those who keep you informed--(including Common Dreams!)
The media is out of control this election has shown us just how far it has gone to dumb-down the public. The recent move by ABC to remove candidates from the debates was outrageous. They are trying to determine the fate of the country and the world being mouth-piece for special interests and the government and to silence dissent.
Media censure is unheard, the FCC should rule for the public but like the EPA its teeth are continually drawn. The media has no right to exclude any politician who is running for office as happened recently with the ABC debate. The only exclusion under the rules used by ABC should apply to a candidate not sitting in public office. The license of ABC would be lifted if the rules were changed but the congress, with the exception of a few pushes for more media conglomeration supported by special interests. I hope that someone picks up on this thought. We have seen the obsession by FOX and CNN, particularly in the form of Wolf Blitzer, and the FOX rabid jouranlists constantly referring to the Rev. Wright controversy.
Blitzer’s bias is clear. He is quick to use every possible negative he can against Obama from the Flag Pin to anything else he could get his mouth around. His support for Clinton has been clear and inappropriate, for CNN to call itself a “fair and balanced†news network. I quote Mr. Nichols:
†The media pretense of being a fly on the wall has often been preposterous. In the real world of politics — where power brokers and manipulators proceed with the cynical axiom that perception is reality — the fly on the wall is the wall. The political press corps is not observing reality as much as redefining it while obstructing outlooks and constraining public perceptions.â€
As usual, few are able to see the stampede of the public sheep created by media. I support the change that Obama represents! He is intelligent and wants America once again to be looked upon as a great nation that it could still be and once was. The present “lack of experience†cry of Clinton is preposterous. Could anyone having been near the White house as long as Bush done as badly for the USA? There is experience! However, the discovery of a job approval rating for him at about 28% of the American people speaks volumes about experience. No one could have been as bad as the Bush team! There is experience!
A flight from entrenched American politics is necessary . . .it has ruined this country and made greed the single value of importance. The young people once again embrace hope as a result of the Obama campaign. The Hillary political group and entrenched politics have virtually destroyed America with its policies and exclusive power clubs. She has believed this form government is America.
Clinton recently morphed to the Obama populist message, it was called, “finding her voice†while at the beginning of her stump showing her Madeline Albright, bomb the children image. 
Can anyone truly think that change is unnecessary? I guess not since all the politicos have adopted his message including McCain? The mistakes that Obama may make as president cannot be greater than those of the past seven years. It is also necessary to give him a democratic congress to make certain that the programs that Americans want can be enacted.
Mr. Gore Vidal, has pointedly criticized mainstream media as one of the major problems, and what is wrong with the USA. The corporate media conglomerates control the message and that message is perversely distorted and panders to its advertising portfolio! Wolf Blitzer one of the glaring examples of this criticism and shows clearly those distorted ideas with his reporting, which is nothing more than partially factual opinion dictated by his bosses.
He is a person who has no right to shape public opinion far from being the “fly on the wall†he espouses to be. We must remember flies morph from maggots. He displays ignorance as a virtue for the entire world to see, an example of what is considered, by many in America to be news reporting. If Blitzer were billed as a CNN commentator, at least the public would not be hoodwinked to believe his reporting to be the truth, while it is lack of concern for accuracy, rectitude and fairness to be considered to be news rather than opinion.
The people of the USA have been so ill informed as to what a change would really do and mean to this country and the change in leadership that is necessary, they have forgotten that no one could be worse than George Bush. . . No one, not even a dogcatcher, at least the dog catcher has compassion for
animals!
The problems America and the world faces should be discussed by the future leaders, Obama or McCain. The problem of public ignorance of the issues caused by the media is serious. In the heat of elections the media panders to voter ignorance. The emphasis, as we see on nightly, so-called news, is constant repetition of candidates miscues. The result of the media sensationalism becomes, the wrong problem and the wrong message at a crucial time in world history. The emphasis on having the politicians address a credible platform of ideas based on an American and global interaction in the world is critical.
There is not enough time left for civilization to focus on rubbish. The energy and environmental issues for example or food and health care are the problems the media should be focusing upon. But to use the Rev, Wright issue for one week, to try and hurt the candidacy of Obama is a travesty. The issues most pressing are once again avoided, those really important issues that must be put before the congress; the environment, continued funding of Iraq, energy issues, education, health care and so many others not dealt with, all impacting upon the economy, the failure of public dialog is outrageous!
The issue of this election will impact on the environment, economy and the future of the USA as no others. Still, if more than 50% of eligible voters cast their votes it will be a miracle, as a result of regressive US election laws and media obfuscation. It is compulsory for everyone to vote in Australia it should be so in the USA as well. Few of the candidates are really talking about the major points, even those who are the most erudite. The environment in association with the economy or health care and elections reform, to name some, are kept out of public dialog as a result of the nonsense punditry hours on end. The world looks at America and its “star struck reality†in wonder.
The political discussion rests on the complete lack of talking points in isolation, such as, Clinton’s health package or the nonsense gasoline tax rebate and it’s cost, rather than what is really at stake with energy issues, human survival. The candidates for the US presidency rarely talk about the complete interrelated package of the issues combined. Obama, alludes to this deficiency in the media and public issues. When he asks for this to occur it lands on deaf ears because the media and special interests do not want this to occur.
The media reduces the public debate to its most simplistic level with pundits arguing about one inconsequential issue or another rather than the truly important issues of our time. The American people are kept from hearing and understanding the relationship of the entire package of issues, which a true leader must address and deal with for the very survival of America in the world within a global economy. The costs for the war would pay for every single need from health care to American infrastructure repair and education, as well as the alleviation of world hunger and energy research this is what is what is at stake.
The media deals with Rev. Wright and American Flag lapel pins instead.
The media keeps the public dumbed down for obvious reasons they represent the moneyed people. As a result the public becomes unable to talk about moving radically toward change and the related issues affecting their very life and the future. The issues of climate change, energy issues and the global economy not only American economy is the part of the mortgage crisis created by the “free market†system. All the other issues like people losing their homes as a result of Wall Street manipulation are tied to these fundamental problems. These is the first and major issue which affects all other issues and is completely related to the economic changes which must take place.
The media board rooms instruct their so-called journalists (news/opinion readers) to stay clear of those subjects that would attack advertising, consumption, tied together in the media collusion with special interests to maintain the consumer system killing the world. Media in collusion with government does not want the change that would result in the decline of their hundreds of millions of dollars in profits.
All environmental problems are in one way or another associated with the Western world’s consumption based lifestyle led by the USA. These issues are affected by consumer advertising much of it coming from the millions spent on advertising of irrelevant product and campaign advertising. The media should be dealing with true American and global issues in this campaign affecting the very basis of the so-called American Dream, fast becoming the global nightmare. This is what the next president of the USA must address
balakirev,
Fox News and most of talk radio aside, I cannot agree that almost all T.V. commentators lean right. I feel this way because of questions asked, stories reported and overall general content from morning to night. The same stories are reported over and over with no new points of view throughout the day. This could be because of lots of reasons but the ones who suffer are those who rely on these outlets for their information. Question: If Fox News is "the right leaning network" what is CNN? What is MSNBC? I could say that most print media in this country leans left. I mention this because I have had the opportunity to see most of this great country and have seen that a lot of what is in print media does not neccesarily reflect the ideals of the local population (not true in all cases but most). Look at paper distribution rates and how they are falling.
annieyoungmn,
The reason why O'Reilly wasn't invited is beacuse he has no interest in media reform. As far as thier stupid solgan (we report, you decide) is concerned that only works if you tell the people the truth and provide both sides to each story, and O'Reilly dosen't do eather.
I love journalism.
I wish I could see some
chris
There are no two-sides. There is an increasingly monopolistic corporate-owned media and there are individuals and small groups and under funded think tanks who wish to reverse this accumulation of media power.
In contrast, the minions of Murdoch and other media giants act on an opposing agenda that brooks no reform, reasoned discussions or statistical evidence of the non-democratic nature of their massive control over the content and focus of the news.
In fact, the media conglomerates use attack dogs like O'Reilly to casually and negatively label as un-American and dangerous any group of citizens whom actually attempt to reform the corporate-dominated media.
When you bring up the two-sides-should-heard argument, you leave out the unequal power context.
I guess you could say that there were two sides to the David and Goliath conflict. However, thoughtful media critics (and critics of the undemocratic foreign, economic and social policies pursued by the US elite)don't have access to the slingshot or stones that David possessed.
The corporate media certainly doesn't allow two-sides to be equally presented within their venue.
Almost all pundits, commentators and talkshow hosts are representatives of the corporate Right.
I was at the conference and knew that O'Reilly was going to attempt to smear the participants and guests. Notice that neither one of his panelists were even at the conference. Fair and Balanced eh?
I tackled some of the things that are wrong with O'Reilly's segment on my blog: http://chriscommons.blogspot.com/
and I am glad to see that this piece by Josh Silver was included here on Common Dreams to counter O'Reilly's distortions and lies.
As long as people watch him....he gets paid, same as all the other hate-mongers. My family disconnected our cable over five years ago and get along just fine without any of our money being channeled to Fox News. It does not matter if you don't watch, actually...if you have cable, Fox News gets paid.
I read this article and watched what Olberman "reported" but what I still don't understand is that none of the questions posed were answered. Now I completly respect Bill Moyers and Dan Rather and all they have accomplished but there seems to be a pervasive avoidance of answering questions asked in favor of blurting out talking points (from both sides of the spectrum). Moyers' response to one question (which we never heard) was that Rupert Murdoch needs to explain why oil is not at $20 a barrel. WHAT? If this was truly a "conference" on media reform than ALL people need to be invited and ALL points of view need to be discussed. Was what O'Reilley "reported" false? I heard some quotes that were very angry bordering on violent (albeit in a lighthearted way) but they only representd a "left view" of thinking. Am I wrong here? Or did I not see the whole thing? These forums are positive and healthy but but are a farse if not all sides are represented.
Why doesn't Bill O start his own Media Reform group and collect together all of his co-workers who have the same agenda that he has, Coulter, Limbaugh, etc. I do not think that the likes of people who are supporting Serious Media Reform would send in their sneaks to rile up Bill O's meetings. As for the persons who are delighted with Bill O and his friends they should have watched the speech given by Bill Moyers at his convention and written about each and every point of his presentation that they disagreed with. It would certainly make for an interesting debate.
"This has gone on long enough, liberal media supporting only one point of view. What happened to just we report, you decide?"
Liberal media - What liberal media? Other than occasional shows like Olbermann's Countdown, much of the main stream media is right-wing or centrist. I am waiting for the decent liberal or progressive change to occur.
O'Reilly does speak his mind, even if some of his views are off the deep end. His candor, I appreciate.
I just viewed the youtubes.
It amazes me that Bill can casually label members of this conference as loony Leftists, dangerous, anti-American, etc., etc...
In addition, when he uses the video of Moyers and Bill's rep., O'Reilly has it carefully edited in order to make his points while he's posing leading questions (and answering them) with the so-called body language "expert."
Of course, he generated totally negative interpretations from his PAID body language expert.
If anyone is dangerous, it is the likes of O'Reilly and his ilk. They still use the McCarthy smear and fear tactics that generate hate and manichean drama at the expense of knowledgable, reasoned two-way conversation.
Why are you against Bill O'Reilly? He's not afraid to speak his mind and if there is a conference on media, shouldn't he be invited? Bill Moyers had plenty of time to talk to the audience. Isn't it only fair that the other Bill should have the opportunity to address his audience too? This has gone on long enough, liberal media supporting only one point of view. What happened to just we report, you decide?
Like those you mentioned, Bill is very well paid opinionated righwing nut job. All of them are.
I wish I could also observe that the corporate-owned media also bestows its largesse and an equal amount of airtime to the same number of reasoning, critical and knowledgable journalists and commentators.
o'reilly reminds me of the rooster who believed the sun rose in the east because he crowed at it.
when will he finally achieve the obscurity he deserves?
How can anyone, even the Neo-Convicts call Bill O’Rally a journalist. He is just another opinionated right wing nut job the likes of Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh.