May, 08 2019, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Katelyn Kriesel, katelyn@hansensadvisory.com
Lindsay Meiman, lindsay@350.org
Syracuse, NY Council Endorses Fossil Fuel Divestment Act, Calls on Statewide Elected Officials to Join
Pressure mounts on Comptroller DiNapoli as Syracuse announces intention to screen funds for fossil fuel companies
Syracuse, NY
Just over a week after a legislative hearing on the New York State Fossil Fuel Divestment Act (FFDA), Syracuse Councilors Joseph Driscoll and Michael Greene announced their city's support for the FFDA and challenged mayors and elected officials across the state to join in supporting divesting the $200 billion state Common Retirement Fund (Fund) from coal, oil and gas companies. The City of Syracuse does not currently invest in fossil fuel stocks, and announced its commitment to implement screens to ensure no future investment for the City's internal funds in these energy sources of the past.
"The City of Syracuse is supporting the New York Fossil Fuel Divestment Act, and calling on other cities around the state to do the same," said Joseph Driscoll, City of Syracuse Common Councilor. "This is the right thing to do economically, morally, and environmentally. In the interest of the long term viability of the communities we represent, we are supporting this bill, and calling on Comptroller Dinapoli to divest from fossil fuel companies in our state pension."
The FFDA would require State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to responsibly divest from the largest 200 fossil fuel companies within five years, prioritizing low performing coal companies. Governor Andrew Cuomo has repeatedly called on DiNapoli to divest from fossil fuels, and recently directed state agencies and their $40 billion funds to move toward divestment.
Driscoll, Greene and all city councilors and most Syracuse government employees are members and future beneficiaries of the Fund which currently has more than $13 billion invested in fossil fuel companies. The FFDA has 28 Senate and 38 Assembly sponsors, gaining support from Senator Michael Gianaris support last week. The Common Council of Syracuse and Mayor Ben Walsh both submitted letters of support for the FFDA last week.
Commenting as a co-sponsor and supporter of the Act, local Senator Rachel May, said: "It is critically important for New York to be a leader in combating climate change. The Fossil Fuel Divestment Act is a common-sense choice. We must invest wisely and begin to shift our economy away from fossil fuels so that we can meet our targets locally and globally for reducing greenhouse gas emissions."
Earlier this month, the State Decarbonization Panel released a long-awaited report recommending overhauled management of the Fund, including urgent climate risk assessment, essentially divestment by any other name. Testimonies from members of the Decarbonization Panel underscored that if Comptroller DiNapoli incorporated their recommendations, the Fund would not have any fossil fuel investments.
"Divesting our state pension fund from fossil fuels will protect workers, retirees, and taxpayers from the rapid loss of value that fossil fuel companies will suffer in the coming energy transition. It will also send a powerful message that it is no longer acceptable to invest in a business model that puts our entire planet at risk. I commend Councilman Driscoll and Councilman Greene for recognizing that the climate crisis is here, and both fiduciary and moral responsibility require the process of divestment to begin now," said Senator Liz Krueger, lead sponsor of the FFDA.
To date, over 1050 institutions representing more than $8.5 trillion in assets have committed to divest, including the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, New York City's pension funds, the City of Denver, Colorado, and the country of Ireland.
QUOTE SHEET:
"Fossil fuel companies have significantly underperformed the broader market over the last 10 years, losing the pension fund more than $20 billion. The comptroller's argument that he is maintaining a stake in these underperforming companies as leverage for shareholder engagement holds no water. As a financial advisor that focuses entirely on socially responsible investing, we understand shareholder advocacy. You cannot proxy vote a fossil fuel company out of drilling for fossil fuels. It simply doesn't work. Comptroller DiNapoli must divest," said Katelyn Kriesel, Financial Advisor, Hansen's Advisory Services; Board President, Reinvestment Alliance.
"Transitioning away from expensive, unhealthy, and inefficient energy sources goes hand in hand with transitioning TO affordable, efficient, renewable energy. We need to put our money toward the energy system we want to have, the one that we need to have if we are to maintain a livable planet," said Andra Leimanis, Communications & Outreach Director with Alliance for a Green Economy.
"With Syracuse joining the call, there's no denying the momentum for divestment of New York state's pension fund. Remaining invested in coal, oil and gas companies makes no financial or moral sense. If Comptroller DiNapoli won't act for New Yorkers, the legislature and the people will force him to. While our communities bear the destruction of climate destruction like Superstorm Sandy and flooding across the state, it's more critical than ever that we use all the tools at our disposal to accelerate the just transition to a fossil free world," Cata Romo, New Yorker and Campaigner with 350.org.
"The Town of DeWitt Supervisor Ed Michalenko and Town Board Member Kerin Rigney strongly support the use of Divestment as a means to switch our country's energy source to one that is sustainable. It is established that the use of fossil fuels is a major contributor to climate change and resulting weather-related disasters that are felt around the world. Divestment of the NYS pension funds are a powerful tool to change this course," said DeWitt Supervisor Ed Michalenko and Board Member Kerin Rigney.
"In addition to Mayor Walsh and Councilors Driscoll and Greene, more than 220 local elected officials from across New York State have called on state officials to align New York's investments with its commitment to clean energy. To protect the communities we serve and the local government employees who depend on the pension fund, we must act quickly. It is inconsistent for the pension system to maintain a financial interest in companies invested heavily in practices that worsen climate change while New York State is committed to policies necessary to avoid catastrophic climate change," said Gregory Young, Fulton County Supervisor and Coordinator for Elected Officials to Protect New York.
"We fully supports and commends Mayor Ben Walsh and the city of Syracuse, NY, in their support of the NY State Fossil Fuel Divestment Act. This legislation, sponsored by Senator Liz Krueger and Assemblyman Felix Ortiz, will legislate a timeline for divestment of the New York State Pension Fund from fossil fuel investment. Saratoga Unites commends the city of Syracuse, NY, and Hansen's Advisory Services for their leadership in fiscal responsibility in the light of challenges of climate change," said Saratoga Unites' Environmental Action Committee.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Retired General Says Hegseth Boat Strike on Shipwrecked Sailors Was a 'War Crime'
"Secretary Hegseth is basically convening everyone to think... this is the kind of thing that happens in war," said retired Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling. "It's not."
Dec 08, 2025
A retired general suggested Monday that the Trump administration’s strike on shipwrecked survivors on September 2 may have been a war crime.
In the face of mounting scrutiny, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has continued to defend what has been described as a "double-tap" strike off the coast of Trinidad, alleging that the two survivors were drug traffickers bound for America who could have still theoretically harmed it in some way despite clinging to the wreckage for their lives following the first strike.
NBC reported this weekend that Adm. Frank "Mitch" Bradley, who oversaw the strikes, told lawmakers that Hegseth had given direct orders for all 11 men aboard the vessel to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted.”
Last week, when reports first emerged of a second strike, Hegseth denied that it had taken place, calling it “fake news” before the White House later confirmed and defended the killing of the survivors.
Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling, who served as the commanding general of the US Army Europe from 2011 to 2012, discussed the strikes on Monday in an appearance on MS NOW's (formerly MSNBC's) "Morning Joe."
"It is, in fact, in my view, a war crime," Hertling said.
"Imagine yourself falling off a cruise ship and being asked to hang on to a piece of wood after you've just been struck with a large kinetic round that has killed nine of your 11 copilots on this boat," Hertling said. "It doesn't matter what they're doing at that point."
Hertling suggested that the frequent use of the term "double-tap" to refer to the strike was a misnomer, as was Hegseth's invocation of the phrase "fog of war" to defend the military's actions.
“That’s a term that special operators use when there are two successive rounds at a target to eliminate it, and to get rid of someone who is attacking them,” the general explained regarding the claims of a "double-tap" strike. “This was a restrike, with time between the first strike and the second. That gives you time to figure out what you’re going to do and clear that so-called ‘fog of war.'”
He cited the definition from Carl von Clausewitz, the 18th-century Prussian general and military theorist who coined the term to describe the “uncertainty” of battle.
"Secretary Hegseth is basically convening everyone to think he has been in war for 20 years, and this is the kind of thing that happens in war. It's not," Hertling continued. "What I'll tell you, having been involved in strikes like this on the ground, the only time you consider a restrike is when the enemy continues to fight, and you're continuing to either strike them with artillery or some type of faraway missile. So a restrike like this occurs when you realize the individuals on the ground or in the water are trying to fight back."
Hegseth and Bradley’s defense of the strikes has centered around the idea that even as they floated helplessly on a piece of debris, the victims still posed a “continuing threat” as they could have theoretically called in other traffickers as backup to retrieve them and their cargo.
As of yet, the administration has presented no evidence that the men were calling for backup, and videos of the incident viewed by members of Congress during a closed-door hearing reportedly suggest they lacked any means of communication. Bradley, meanwhile, acknowledged in his Senate testimony that the survivors did not appear to have any radio or communication devices.
Further undermining the Trump administration's argument that the boat posed an immediate threat, Bradley also reportedly told Congress that the ship was not even bound for the US, but for the South American nation of Suriname.
Hertling emphasized that the two men were shipwrecked on "a piece of debris floating in the middle of the Caribbean," adding that "these individuals are not going to go anywhere, which will become clear with the film," though Hertling acknowledged that he had not personally seen it.
In recent days, leading Democrats, as well as some Republicans in Congress, have called for the release of the video, which House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Jim Himes (D-Conn.) described last week as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.” Himes said that while the video showed the men were carrying drugs, “they were not in a position to continue their mission in any way.”
The strike was the first in a months-long campaign of extrajudicial bombings by the Trump administration on boats that they have claimed without evidence have contained drug traffickers bound for the US. At least 87 people have been killed in the two dozen strikes since September. Some of those killed in the strikes were later reported to have been ordinary fishermen, and others who had nothing to do with the drug trade.
While focus has been centered on the details of the September 2 strike in recent days and Hegseth's role, experts have emphasized that the entire boat-bombing campaign is illegal.
"The initial attack was illegal too,” said Kenneth Roth, the former longtime director of the advocacy group Human Rights Watch, on social media last week. "Whether Hegseth ordered survivors killed after a US attack on a supposed drug boat is not the heart of the matter. It is blatantly illegal to order criminal suspects to be murdered rather than detained. There is no 'armed conflict' despite Trump's claim."
While the "Morning Joe" segment focused on the question of whether the second September 2 strike was a war crime, some legal experts have said those involved in ordering and carrying out that attack and the other bombings could actually be liable for murder under US law, since Congress has not authorized an armed conflict in the Caribbean.
Keep ReadingShow Less
After Trump Vow to Intervene, Kushner Linked to Paramount's Hostile Bid for Warner Bros.
"The correct option is neither Paramount nor Netflix buy Warner," said one antitrust advocate.
Dec 08, 2025
Paramount Skydance on Monday launched a hostile bid to take over Warner Bros. Discovery shortly after US President Donald Trump publicly expressed skepticism of Netflix's proposed deal to acquire parts of the media company—and pledged to intervene in the federal review process.
"It is a big market share, there’s no question about it," Trump said late Sunday of Netflix's proposed $83 billion purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery's (WBD) film studio and streaming business.
"I’ll be involved in that decision," the president added.
Hours after Trump's comments, Paramount CEO David Ellison—the son of billionaire GOP megadonor and close Trump ally Larry Ellison—announced the hostile bid to buy WBD, attempting to subvert the Netflix deal by taking an all-cash, $30-per-share offer directly to Warner Bros. shareholders.
Observers expressed alarm over the seeming coordination between the president and Paramount's chief executive as the fight over Warner Bros. escalates. Trump reportedly favored Paramount to win the bidding war for WBD, which owns CNN, HBO Max, and other major assets.
Axios reported Monday that "Affinity Partners, the private equity firm led by Jared Kushner, is part of Paramount's hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros Discovery, according to a regulatory filing."
"Affinity Partners was not mentioned in Paramount's press release on Monday morning about its $108 billion bid," Axios noted, "nor were participating sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar."
Ellison was reportedly at the White House last week urging the Trump administration to block Netflix's bid for WBD.
Speaking to CNBC on Monday, Ellison said that "we've had great conversations with the president about" Paramount—which controls CBS News thanks to a merger that the Trump administration approved—potentially becoming the owner of CNN, a frequent target of Trump's vitriol.
CNBC: Do you think the president embraces the idea of you being the owner of CNN given his criticism for that network?
DAVID ELLISON: Ah -- we've had great conversations with the president about this but I don't want to speak for him in any way, shape, or form pic.twitter.com/FdwBzfP3eO
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 8, 2025
Nidhi Hegde, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, said in response to Ellison's remarks that "the correct option is neither Paramount nor Netflix buy Warner."
"The president inserting himself in the deal is obviously problematic, regardless of the parties involved," said Hegde. "If Netflix’s Ted Sarandos, who Trump called a great person, finds a way to appease him, that is also not good!"
US Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) expressed similar concerns about Trump's potential corruption of the regulatory process. The proposed Netflix deal is expected to face a review by the US Justice Department's Antitrust Division, where top officials were recently ousted for "insubordination" amid criticism of agency leaders' corporate-friendly approach to merger enforcement.
"Is that an open invite for CEOs to curry favor with Trump in exchange for merger approvals?" Warren asked after Trump pledged to insert himself into the Netflix-WBD review process.
"It should be an independent decision by the Department of Justice based on the law and facts," added Warren, who called the Netflix-WBD deal "an anti-monopoly nightmare."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Top Brazilian Official Warns Trump of 'Vietnam-Style' Regional Conflict If He Attacks Venezuela
"The last thing we want is for South America to become a war zone," said Celso Amorim, chief foreign policy adviser to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Dec 08, 2025
A top Brazilian official is warning President Donald Trump that a US military attack on Venezuela could easily spiral out of control into a "Vietnam-style" regional conflict.
Celso Amorim, chief foreign policy adviser to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, said in an interview published on Monday by the Guardian that a US military strike on Venezuela would inevitably draw nations throughout Latin America into an armed conflict that would be difficult to contain.
"The last thing we want is for South America to become a war zone—and a war zone that would inevitably not just be a war between the US and Venezuela," he said. "It would end up having global involvement and this would be really unfortunate."
Amorim added that "if there was an invasion, a real invasion [of Venezuela]... I think undoubtedly you would see something similar to Vietnam—on what scale it’s impossible to say."
While acknowledging that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is disliked by many other South American leaders, Amorim predicted that even some of Maduro's adversaries would rally to his side in the face of destabilizing military actions by the US government.
He also predicted that anti-US sentiment would surge throughout the continent in the event of an invasion, as there is still major resentment toward the US for backing right-wing military coups during the Cold War in Chile, Brazil, and other nations.
"I know South America," he emphasized. "Our whole continent exists because of resistance against foreign invaders."
The Trump administration in recent weeks has signaled that it plans to launch attacks against purported drug traffickers inside Venezuela, even though reports from the US government and the United Nations have not identified Venezuela as a significant source of drugs that enter the United States.
The administration has also accused Maduro of leading an international drug trafficking organization called the Cartel de los Soles, despite many experts saying that they have seen no evidence that such an organization formally exists.
Trump late last month further escalated tensions with Venezuela when he declared that airspace over the nation was "closed in its entirety," even though he lacks any legal authority to enforce such a decree.
The Washington Post reported on Monday that Maduro is remaining defiant in the face of US pressure, as he is refusing to go into exile despite the threat of an attack on his country.
According to the Post's sources, Maduro's inner circle of allies "shows no signs of imminent collapse," even as he has limited his public appearances and beefed up his personal security amid fears that he could be the target of an assassination attempt.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


