Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Billionaire Launches Campaign to Slash Social Security
Why does a billionaire want to take away your Social Security benefits? 
Peter Peterson is 84 years old. He's old enough to relax and enjoy the fruits of the years he was well paid for managing other rich people's money. Why is he spending his fortune to convince politicians they should ruin the average guy's retirement?
Today Peterson announced the next facet in his long campaign to hack Social Security, including a joke Presidential candidate named Hugh Jidette ("huge debt") and a website called Owe No. His aim is to convince Congress to raise the retirement age, cut Social Security's cost-of-living increases-and raise the payroll taxes we pay for Social Security and Medicare.
It wouldn't matter what one cranky octogenarian billionaire had to say if he weren't putting $6 million into ads, funding "expert" commissions, and spreading lies designed to panic the populace.
Maybe Peterson figures offense is better than defense-he's got a lot to defend. He made his fortune as a hedge fund manager-that is, moving money around-so he ought to be living in fear. Someone might get the idea he and his buddies would be good folks to tax. It's like Willie Sutton, the famous bank robber, once said. Asked why he robbed banks, Sutton replied, "Because that's where the money is."
Peterson and pals are the ones George Bush gifted with big tax breaks that are set to expire December 31. Although he says his top priority is reducing the deficit, Peterson doesn't want to cut that deficit by putting his own taxes back where they were in the 1990s.
It's hard to get your head around how rich Peterson is, and how many rich people there are in this country. But here's how to put their money in perspective, in relation to Social Security. If Congress decides to extend those tax cuts, for households making $250,000 or more (the top 2 percent of earners), the money the Treasury will lose would be enough to put Social Security in the black for 75 years--and raise benefits by 2 percent.
First They Took Your House
Meanwhile, we have a big chunk of near-retirees today who have barely seen their wages rise at all during their working lifetimes, the last 30 years. They couldn't save a huge amount; what they saved they had in home equity. And that was wiped away by the financial shenanigans of Peter Peterson and his ilk. There are millions of potential retirees who will have next to nothing except Social Security if they're ever able to retire. It wasn't enough for Wall Street to rob us of our houses' worth and what we had in 401(k)s. Now they want to take Social Security too.
Like I said, I don't understand it. Is there no shuffleboard court where this man could spend his golden years?
A friend wrote to me today. He's working his butt off to keep Congress from raising the retirement age and cut back Medicare. He said:
My mother was an LPN in a nursing home. The last few years that she worked, her back and legs ached so much that she literally had to crawl up the stairs to her bedroom at night. If someone told her that she would have to work three more years before retirement because hedge fund managers don't want to pay the same percentage of their income towards Social Security as she did, she would tell you what to do.
A slew of organizations is organizing a Call-In Day to Congress November 30. That's the day before President Obama's deficit commission is set to release its recommendations for raising the retirement age. They're saying "Owe No You Don't"-the goal is to create a groundswell of outrage that will make the recommendations dead on arrival. Find out more at strengthensocialsecurity.org and see Labor Notes' package of fact sheets and info.
- Posted in

71 Comments so far
Show AllThis guy is in Hell but doesn't know it.
Good point!
What sort of heartless man is this? I guess Dickens had him nailed-Ebenezer Scrooge.
If Peterson was the only wealthy man with a lifelong goal of destroying Social Security we probably wouldn't be too concerned, however, Obama has stacked his deficit reduction commission with Peterson clones having equal vigor and resources to transfer Social Security money into corporate welfare programs with the net result of no deficit reduction, just diversion of more of our money into the pockets of the uberwealthy.
Peterson HAS found the shuffleboard court of his dreams. Your head and my head are the pucks he is slamming around.
i think we need to know more about peterson than just what we read in one article. for instance, he has stated that he is for universal health care and reducing military spending as well as increasing taxes for the rich. before you rush to judgment, listen to this interview with charlie rose (one of 12 appearances):
http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10443
Pete Peterson has my vote for Fascist Bastard of the Year!!
see my earlier comment
Wait till you deal with Elder Care issues and find out first hand just how this whole thing plays out.
Don't count on leaving much, if anything, to your heirs.
What they will inherit is the last days of your life ( or years) will be fraught with navigating a boondoggle system, while trying to make the best decisions for their loved one.
And in the end, Medical will take most, or all, the assets.
Signed, being "educated" as we go, while Mother dies a slow death.
ah, I know this well. i'm on my third parent dying this year alone, and the system is a horror show. everything is designed to wipe you out financially coming and going, until medicaid may or may not kick in.
the irony is that the process takes a huge toll on caregivers and PoAs/Guardians simply from the constant fending off of relentless wolves trying to get their cut.
for doing the right thing, i'll have lost my career, my personal life, my initally scheduled inheritance, and solid chunks of my physical and mental health. especially since all of our cases have been long grinders, nothing fast.
i don't know of much that can rival the moral degeneracy of how this country forces many older people to be cared for, and the havoc this sytem wreaks on families in the process.
Sincere condolences to you, Jessia and Drone. Thank you for sharing your experiences, giving real substance the struggle we all wage. Our family went through similar ordeals a few years back, and I'm sure others here can empathize as well.
The added stress at the end of life in a Darwinian empire that treats the least among us as cast-offs is truly tragic and inexcusable. One day we will overcome that, perhaps at the end of empire, when the reckless elite are removed from power.
But even so, we know that some values always transcend these temporal financial struggles. The love you share now in saying goodbye to your beloved is finally the most precious, empowering, and enduring experience that never leaves you---ever. Love covers all shortcomings and trials, ours and others, and it is most precious to those who are leaving to feel that peace and spiritual bond at their passage.
We wish you strength and peace.
Excellent article, excellent expose.
If the Dems gut Social Security in the name of bipartisanship on Obama's watch, then they are toast forever.
Bill from Saginaw
That is what was said about republicans at the end of the cheney administration.
It is inevitable that both parties will work together to gut social scurity and medicare in order to pay for the cost of political and business corruption, the expansion of the overseas empire and the coming war with Iran. It is a simple question of priorities.
Real bank robbers aren't quite so dumb. The real Willie Sutton didn't actually say any such thing. This was attributed to him by a reporter.
In any case Sutton's reputation is besmirched by comparing him to a hedge fund manager.
"Never trust anyone over 30" (or, I might add, who pulls down more than $100,000 a year). Progressives won the important battles, for civil rights, womens rights, peace, and the environment, back in the 1960s. But, unfortunately, they did hatch some awful slogans. When it came to generational warfare, or class warfare, the hippies support was pretty weak: they knew they would grow old, and desired money like anyone else.
Ironically, people on the right were deeply offended. They knew they had been engaging in neither (but they also knew these were just slogans). Yet, at that point they hatched a plan, and have been engaging in BOTH class warfare and generational warfare ever since. Thats what the tax cuts were about, the deregulation of the finance sector, and the massive debt. It was all leading to this: where the poor and the young are asked to pay for it all.
This is important for young people to grasp. You don't inherit someone elses $13 trillion debt, made by giving tax cuts to the richest people in the country, unless they hate you, and your relative poverty. The sooner young people grasp that regressives have been engaged in BOTH class warfare AND generational warfare for 30 years now, the sooner they can join the battle, and win it for themselves.
(Oh, yes, and the roads, bridges, and electric lines are all about broken. Someone focused on tax cuts for themselves thought you wouldn't mind footing the bill on this one, too. Oh, and would you mind paying for Iraq? There's a fellow...)
Yes, the US is on the fast track to becoming a third world nation.
Well he's definetly going to hell ! Rich people have so much arogance, look at Bush, he thinks he has done nothing wrong at all...they all seem to have some inability to have empathty, oh I no ! they are soicialpaths, or however you spell that ..they are selfish dick heads that have no remorse for their evil deeds .
It's Rule by the divine right of Billionaires.
Very carefully, billionaires have placed themselves as champions of freedom and democracy. And way too many people who are not billionaires and suffer because there are billionaires believe them.
Peter Peterson should be dragged from his office and beaten with sticks. But instead he'll get a good online scolding.
At what outrage do we stop blogging and take to the streets?
We're doomed because we don't act, we only react. And our reactions are all powerless because we're too spooked to leave our homes.
The revolution will not be blogged.
I couln't agree with you more, and I was " in the streets" years ago. No, revolution or change will not come from a computor-only hard earned work and visible organization-remember Martin Luther King? will bring change. Why are people so scared ? What made them "pussies"? You're right-we react not act today. There are plenty of green activists but our mainstream media won't feature them or will act as if they;re "cute." Also, people forget-we were together for about five minutes as a nation after 911. Now we're more polarized than ever because of the almighty dollar.
Yes, it's terribly frustrating for all the FBI agents provocateurs that spend their days on these boards hoping to incite someone isn't it? Trying so hard to lure a bunch of egghead pacifist lefties into agreeing to blow something up. It's so much easier with right-wing neanderthals, whose every utterance is laced with murderous violence.
Then again, who wants to arrest their friends?
You know, what's going on in the blogs may in fact be better than running around breaking windows at Starbucks.
People are disgusted with all of this: war, torture, economic injustice, environmental destruction. They are tuning out the media. Shutting off cable. Dumping the duopoly. Learning to grow their own food. Not buying any more useless shit. Getting out of debt. Banks? Who needs them when you've got no money and don't plan on ever having any again.
Could be the revolution this time is much deeper, more lasting, and impervious to the machinations of the state to stamp out.
The latest report of the Bipartisan Commission that monitors Social Security forecast that Social
Security will be able to pay out the full benefits
for another 25 years (and the present level of benefits forever).
One simple change to the Social Security law (removing the ceiling on income subject to Social
Security tax currently $106,800 per year) would enable us to reduce the tax rate paid by both
employers and employees by at least one-third and
ensure Social Security solvency forever.
Right now billionaire hedge fund thieves pay the
same number of dollars to Social Security as do
new pharmacists at Walgreen's
A new pharmacist makes $106K a year? Or are you assuming the hedge fund managers would pay the employer contributon too.
$53K a year is still a very good starting salary. I started at about half that with a masters degree in civil engineering in 1992.
Watch the markets.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/pomo-schedule-announced-105-billion-monetizations-through-december-9
Yet another wet dream of emerging oligarchs, to be facilitated by the triangulating Oilbomber.
and on a lighter note, the guy, (Peter Peterson), has a double phallic name, is it any wonder what he wants to do to us?
see my earlier comment
Yes I do resent a few people having too much money and power over the rest of us.
Paupers Launch Campaign to Slash Peter G. Peterson.
What, really, do the rich do to earn their keep in a society?
Very few of them put in an honest day of work.
Few of them (contrary to those characters in Ayn Rand novels) create anything useful or beautiful. At very best, they fund someone - in an already publicly-funded State U. then sieze the patent for their own, for pennies on the dollar of the patents ultimate value, exploiting the need for the salary-earning inventor to keep his family fed. Or they simply use the clever patent-writing services of lawyers the rich man hires. But even these are a minority; most have nothing even perpherally to do with creating anything useful.
Alternatively, they earn their fortune on the backs of millions of sweatshop workers paid a penny on the dollar of the actual labor-value of the products thay make.
Mostly, they just make money with money using elaborate gravity-defying investment "instruments", that fall back to earth when someone else is holding the "instrument" which most recently were the roofs over family's heads. And they do this with inherited family money at that.
So, what good are they? Indeed, the question should be how bad they are.
Imagine what a society would look like if all the wealth generated in an economy was distributed to the people who actually produce it, in accordance with effort and sacrifice, and only effort and sacrifice - not pre-existing wealth or position in a heararchy. What a wonderful time to be alive that would be!
I expect a response from the troll Hector or whatver his nick is. We should look at his posts positively, the fact that the rich are trolling here is a sign that they are worrying.
Remember 1789, 1917, 1949, and 1959, rich man! That's not a threat, just a lesson from history.
Pete Peterson is the old crippled mean banker character Potter from the classic 40's movie "It's a Wonderful life." He wants to steal Uncle Billy's deposit ( all our SSI deps.) and give it all to himself like Potter did in the movie. Old man Potter is the quintessential American banker today. They all want to reduce the rest of us to paupers and force us to live in Pottervilles of their making. Unfortunately, it's looking pretty good for them these days.
"Is there no shuffleboard court where this man could spend his golden years?"
The point is here's a person with too much wealth planning to perform an asocial deed with some of it. He could as well be old, rich, and do good. Theoretically.
We all have little prejudices, but they, in this case ageism, don't belong in good writing.
I really don't think any amount of spending, lobbying, and propagandizing about cuts, privatization, etc. will avert a huge public outcry when Social Security is actually attacked. I hope I'm right.
Social Security has a 2.5 TRILLION dollar surplus, which was "borrowed" (stolen) to pay for other things . It will soon need to be repaid, and so now is the time for trashing SS. This is the ugliest form of class-war. The US is already way behind other western democracies in caring for its citizens, but nothing short of 100% corporate feudalism will satisfy these freaks. There are many sides to human nature, and these people personify all the worst.
Where my parents come from, they would grap this piece of shyte, slide some tires around his body, set him on fire and roll him down the street. Then, the poor people would make sandwiches with his meaty face. We are but sheep, in this country.
Wow. A man with all his billions wants to take away the only modest little safety net that keeps millions out of dire poverty (and even that only sometimes barely so).
The billionaire hedge fund vampires pay a smaller percentage of their income to taxes (on their ill gotten gains) than a waitress. The billionaires pay just a small fraction of their "compensation" to Social Security while all of a waitress's wages are subject to SS taxes. Just lift the cap on wage taxes which is currently set at $106,800 and have Pete Peterson pay SS taxes on all his earnings.
This jihad against SS by billionaires is just pure forking evil. Do not raise the retirement age, do not cut SS or the COLA, instead strengthen SS.
Peter Peterson is a rat bastard. It will be interesting to see how many of his brethren fall in line. Those that do will be doomed forever. They will find hell on earth.
Cut billionaires. To the bone.
I wish when an article like this is written that the reporter give the address where this schmuck Peter Peterson lives. The address of his offspring would be helpful as well. The earth will do fine without their presence.
This is personal. Needs a face to face solution.
Not too old to be taught a lesson. Boycott his companies? Or a paddling?
Not too old to be taught a lesson. Boycott his companies? Or a paddling? I'm sick of hearing what rich people think. They've created the mess this country is in. How about a visit to Madame Guillotine?
The only people I know who really want to keep on working after retirement are those lazy bastards in Congress. Just ask a brick layer or a brain surgeon if they want to keep working, put another way..do you want a 70 year old building your house or operating on your brain? Writers, artists, musicians are equipped to keep working longer as they are productive and contributing citizens.
The cost of living increase being denied for the second year in a row since its inception is nuts. Evidently the only people who feel it is necessary to keep up with the increases in the cost of living are those in Congress who voted themselves another nice increase. Their standard answer is... that they have to give themselves a raise because it is the law. My answer to that is... the people who made the law can change it.
I suggest putting the question of changing Social Security on a state referendum and hold a one time special election and let the people decide. Just put it on a ballot (a paper ballot) without any campaigning or any propaganda from the right or their think tanks or from any one of the deficit commissions. Settle the debate once and for all and get on with addressing the real cause of deficits...tax cut for the wealthy and endless wars!!!!
Why don't we get rid of disabled people while we're at it? People are not only heartless but brain dead. When are the oligarchy members going to be punished?
The only problem with Social Security is that Peter Peterson and other people making over $100,000 aren't paying their fair 13% into it.
These guys think they're winning the class war.
All they're doing is prompting the dusting off of the guillotines.
Shouldn't we just rename America "Potterville" and be done with it?
FIRST -- SOCIAL SECURITY COSTS GOVERNMENT NOTHING --
FICA PAYMENTS ARE MADE BY EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS AND HAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH THE DEBT!! NEITHER ADDING TO IT, NOR SUBTRACTING FROM IT!!
SOCIAL SECURITY IS IN THE BLACK AND IF THE TREASURY NOTES
WERE IMMEDIATELY CASHED IN IT WOULD BE SOLVENT INFINITELY.
AND SOCIAL SECURITY IS RUNNING HUGE SURPLUSSES EVERY YEAR --
$250 MILLION AND MORE WHICH HAS SERVED AS A SLUSH FUND FOR
WARS AND TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH.
BUT THIS IS AN INTERESTING COMPARISON OF HOW WELL THE
WEALTHY HAVE BEEN TREATED BY RIGHT WING POLITICIANS IN
CONGRESS WHOM THEY HAVE HAVE BOUGHT AND OWN....
QUOTE ....
It’s hard to get your head around how rich Peterson is, and how many rich people there are in this country. But here’s how to put their money in perspective, in relation to Social Security. If Congress decides to extend those tax cuts, for households making $250,000 or more (the top 2 percent of earners), the money the Treasury will lose would be enough to put Social Security in the black for 75 years--and raise benefits by 2 percent.
UNQUOTE
Imagine being Peter Peterson and waking up every morning
with such a world of opportunity within his reach and yet
his personal goals are to destroy and harm millions of others. Unimaginable!
.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
capitalism
The Social Security tax is a regressive tax. If you made $400 last year, you paid 13% of that into Social Security. Ouch!! If you made $100,000, you paid 13% into Social Security. If you made $1,000,000, you paid 13% on the first $100,000 and zero on the last $900,000, for an average tax rate of 1.3% on your income.
By bumping up the retirement age to, say, 80, they're telling all the middle income people who paid the tax all their life, and not the rich, that they're getting a little haircut. The government's biggest expense by far has been the Iraq war, which apparently has benefited Exxon, Shell and the Chinese government that will now get all the oil. So, basically they're haircutting a little off the top of the life savings of people who have paid into Social Security for 40 years or so. These hard working people have just been stooges to put their money in the United States Bank, and they will now have to shoulder the brunt of the war debt instead of having their money back. This tax has nothing to do with "making Social Security solvent". It's a bank robbery against your life savings.
Anyone here familiar with David Baerwald's album called "Triage?" David Baerwald was one half of the group David & David who made a brilliant album in the 80's titled, "Welcome to the Boomtown."
Baerwald's album is an amazing piece of work. A complex musical and lyrical album that is very political but not done in the traditional overt manner. The cover has a blood-stained hand juxtaposed over a US flag.
Baerwald did this album in the late 80's early 90's, can't remember exactly the year. He dedicated the album to Dean Acheson, Allen Dulles, James Baker III, George Bush Sr. and a few others of that ilk. In the dedication given to those men he followed it with, "In the hope that there is a God and that He is vengeful beyond all comprehension."
Same dedication applies to Peter Peterson.
David Baerwald made the album, Triage, in 1992. I had almost forgotten about him -- he deserves a wider audience. However, didn't he write the song, "Come What May," for the 2001 film, Moulin Rouge?
"A Secret Silken World" -- David Baerwald (Herb Alpert is the trumpet player)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LV7ZPuQc-0
For anyone who might be interested, the following link is an interview with David Baerwald for Hearsay Magazine in 1999:
http://www.dbinfosource.com/mags/hearsay.asp
Thanks, mcoyote, for the reminder!