Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
U.S. Legacy in Afghanistan: Giant Prisons
Despite claims to hand over control of the main U.S. detention center in Afghanistan to the Afghans, the U.S. military is instead investing millions to double the size of the facility.
Spencer Ackerman writes in Danger Room this morning:
(U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Matt Hecht)
There once was a plan to turn over the main U.S. detention center in Afghanistan to control of the Afghans in 2011. That’s out the window. Instead, the military is offering millions to vastly expand the center’s inmate intake.
Specifically, $35 million will fund expansions necessary to house “approximately 2,000 detainees” at the Detention Facility at Parwan on the outskirts of Bagram Air Field, an hour’s drive from Kabul. The Army Corps of Engineers wants to expand “detainee housing, guard towers, administrative facility and Vehicle/Personnel Access Control Gates, security surveillance and restricted access systems,” according to a recent solicitation. A Turkey-based company received the contract in late January. [...]
And Parwan isn’t the only detention center on the grow: the U.S. is spending up to $100 million building jails across Afghanistan.
* * *
As Nick Turse noted last week, the "drawdown" in Afghanistan has been anything but:
Despite all the talk of drawdowns and withdrawals, there has been a years-long building boom in Afghanistan that shows little sign of abating. In early 2010, the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had nearly 400 bases in Afghanistan. Today, Lieutenant Lauren Rago of ISAF public affairs tells TomDispatch, the number tops 450.
The hush-hush, high-tech, super-secure facility at the massive air base in Kandahar is just one of many building projects the U.S. military currently has planned or underway in Afghanistan. While some U.S. bases are indeed closing up shop or being transferred to the Afghan government, and there’s talk of combat operations slowing or ending next year, as well as a withdrawal of American combat forces from Afghanistan by 2014, the U.S. military is still preparing for a much longer haul at mega-bases like Kandahar and Bagram airfields. The same is true even of some smaller camps, forward operating bases (FOBs), and combat outposts (COPs) scattered through the country’s backlands. “Bagram is going through a significant transition during the next year to two years,” Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Gerdes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Bagram Office recently told Freedom Builder, a Corps of Engineers publication. “We’re transitioning... into a long-term, five-year, 10-year vision for the base.”
Whether the U.S. military will still be in Afghanistan in five or 10 years remains to be seen, but steps are currently being taken to make that possible. U.S. military publications, plans and schematics, contracting documents, and other official data examined by TomDispatch catalog hundreds of construction projects worth billions of dollars slated to begin, continue, or conclude in 2012.

38 Comments so far
Show Alltoday's major powers are competing for strategic interests and military bases along the old Silk Road."
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/the-new-gr...
A good pretext for war/occupation is always necessary. The US and Europe owe much to the efforts of MI6/CIA to provide it by creating Al Qaeda and working to destabilize the area for decades.
"The development of the region is comparable to the development of America's Last Frontier by the Union Pacific Railroad, as it cut straight across the North American continent:
The great pitch in the Great Game.
Despite their strategic location and economic potential, ... the Central Asians ... have the least power to shape their own future..."
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/the-new-gr...
A vast network of prisons and outposts are to manage any opposition (and to instill fear in the people to decrease its possibility), and to have numbers of localized control/operational centers.
Here's the situation within our lovely "homeland" (quoted from Morris Berman's blog of February 13, 2012):
"Land of the Free Data reported in Adam Gopnik's New Yorker essay of January 30, 'The Caging of America':
1. There are more black men in the grip of the American criminal-justice system today than there were in slavery in 1850. (I have also read that both in absolute numbers and per capita, the US has more black people in its jails than South Africa did at the height of apartheid.)
2. There are more people under 'correctional supervision' in America (more than 6 million) than there were in the Russian gulag under Stalin, at its height. (I have read elsewhere, in several academic sources, that 25% of the world's prisoners are in American jails -- this in a country that has less than 5% of the world's population. I also read that 1 out of every 31 Americans is caught up in the criminal justice system in one form or another.)
3. More than 50,000 men are currently in solitary confinement in the US.
4. More than 70,000 American prisoners are raped every year.
5. In 1980, 220 people were incarcerated for every 100,000 Americans; in 2010, the figure had risen to 731 (more than tripled). 'No other country even approaches that,' writes Gopnik.
6. In the last 20 years, the money states spend on prisons in the US has risen at six times the rate of spending on higher education.
7. A huge percentage of American prisoners are serving sentences much longer than those given for similar crimes anywhere else in the developed world (e.g., marijuana use).
Gopnik concludes: 'Mass incarceration on a scale almost unexampled in human history is a fundamental fact of our country today...incarceration...acts as a hidden foundation for the country.'"
A government that does that to its own people is capable of doing nearly anything to other peoples.
One problem that surely will translate into the Afghan prisons is racism of the guards. With no oversight and no family visits, bad things will happen.
Don't you care about the babies?
I think anyone doing that should have their country invaded and smashed to smithereens. What they do after we leave, and their country is in ruins, is up to them. But at least by blowing up Iraq we gave the babies a chance.
What do you think?
Don't you know we are spreading democracy and protecting human rights? If we didn't bomb everything, kill millions, lock up more millions, impoverish still more millions, torture people, poison the water and air, destroy ecosystems and keep everyone in a constant state of fear and anxiety, just THINK how horrible things would be.
This is the pseudo-liberal justification for war -- liberate these poor people from oppression. But only the people can liberate themselves from oppression, as the sheeple in Amerika will learn.
Afghanistan survived for thousands of years before the USA "liberated" it, or more accurately, "liberated" their natural resources and terrain. What makes you think you have higher moral standing than Muslims when it comes to ethics? Almost all Muslims abhor violence such as acid throwing, but white Christians project the acid throwing onto the entire Muslim population.
We had to burn the village in order to save it.
...and Mexico, Dominican Republic, Panama, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Laos, Korea, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Honduras, Haiti, Cuba, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Uruguay, Chile, Bolivia, Granada, Ecuador, Brazil, Russia, China, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Libya, and against the native peoples in North America.
Yes, "we terribly regret" these "mistakes from the past."
Not familiar with the Boxer Rebellion, I see.
So. Let's see if I understand you. History is full of mistakes and successes, so we can't really say anything about anything. Since war is inevitable, we may as well get on with it. If we didn't go to war, things would be worse.
http://mindprod.com/politics/iraqdubabiespix.html
http://uruknet.info/index.php?p=m58926&hd=&size=1&l=e
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ix=sea&ie=UTF-8&ion...
Along with: - Forty years of US interference with Afghan domestic politics.
- Luring the then USSR into intervention and disastrous military misadventure in Afghanistan.
- Creation and support of the mujahadin 'freedom fighters'.
- The legacy of US invasion and occupation.
- CIA support for the Afghan opium trade.
- US support of warlords tied to the drug trade.
- Widely dispersed sub-munitions (bomblets) from US cluster bombs
- Greatly increased impoverishment of already marginal rural communities.
- The destruction of UN recognized world heritage sites.
- The thousands of night-time terror raids and abductions.
- The unprovoked US execution of prisoners locked in a steel shipping container.
- The US legacy of abduction and torture of innocents betrayed for monetary gain.
- US legacy of Predator drone attacks.
- The hundreds of deaths due to drone attacks and air strikes on weddings and funerals mis-identified as 'terrorist gatherings'.
- The installation of a despised US puppet government headed by a former oil company stooge.
- The nationwide destruction of electrical generation power plants, water treatment facilities, bridges, roads, hospitals, schools and other advanced infrastructure.
- Tens of thousands of dead and maimed.
- Dozens of US Military bases following a proposed pipeline route.
Should I list even more highlights of the US 'legacy' in Afghanistan?
To c03x1s, 7Feb 20 2012 - 12:18pm, State Dept troll:
The legacy of Amerikkka (aka the Evil Empire) to Afghanistan is mayhem, destruction, torture, more mayhem, more torture, more civilians (primarily women and children) murdered, and more terrorism.
Don't give me the women's liberation card: it's an old, hackneyed, pathetic justification for the US being in that country, already used to death by your friends, Baby Bush and his pals.
US go home and mind your own business, for a change!