EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Popular content
Today's Top News
Occupy Davos: Attendees Confront a New Wave of Anger
Plus: George Soros on the Coming US Class War
This years’ World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, marks the start of the perennial capitalist meet-and-greet summit season.
Members of the Occupy WEF movement gather at their camp site in the Swiss mountain resort of Davos January 22, 2012. The Occupy WEF members will stay in a camp of several igloos and tents to protest during the World Economic Forum (WEF), which takes place from January 25 to 29. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann The economic equivalent of the Oscars, the WEF is a time for the 0.1% to celebrate the achievements and successes of free-markets, and to discuss how to keep the crumbling ship from running ashore; it’s also a time to get in a few good runs on the slopes, deep tissue massages and a soothing hot tub session on the 99%’s dime.
Nestled in the picturesque Swiss Alps where the melting glaciers are deceptively intact and the hotels serviced by an army of invisible temporary workers, approximately 2000 global elites discuss everything from redistributing their obscene profits (a.k.a philanthropy) and environmental sustainability, to forecasting new areas of expansion and the future of capitalism.
On this latter note, delegates will be treated to a special brainstorming session on corporate capitalism’s forecast led by the wisdom of Bank of America CEO, Bryan Moynihan. Then to jazz things up, there will be several roundtable discussions with social media and internet hotshots, Facebook and Google, on how the revolutionary elements of web organizing can reinforce market growth.
Gag. Why hasn’t a stink bomb already gone off in this place? (Adbusters)
* * *
Davos Forum Founder Says Capitalism is Out of Balance, Warns Conflicts Await
The Associated Press reports:
DAVOS, Switzerland — The founder of the World Economic Forum warns that capitalism is out of balance and welcomes protesters’ ideas of how to fix it.
In an interview, Klaus Schwab insists he’s still “a deep believer in free markets, but free markets have to serve society.” He’s getting ready to greet 2,600 world leaders, CEOs and other dignitaries for talks this week to tackle global economic challenges.
He said members of the Occupy protest movement camped in igloos in Davos have been invited to a session on the sidelines of the forum on reforming capitalism.
Protest organizer David Roth told the AP his group hadn’t decided yet whether to accept.
* * *
Davos Attendees Confront a New Wave of Anger
From the New York Times today:
Occupy WEFToday, the gap between the haves and the have-nots is no longer just a rallying cry to incite anticapitalist activists. It has become a mainstream issue, debated openly in arenas where the primacy of laissez-faire capitalism used to be taken for granted and where talk of inequality used to be derided as class warfare.
In the United States, the issue surfaced when protesters proclaimed they were the ‘‘99 percent’’ of the population who were paying for the sins of the wealthy “1 percent,” taking their grievances directly to the epicenter of capitalism. The Occupy Wall Street protest, which began in New York, later spread to other cities around the United States and across the world.
In Spain, thousands of “indignados” converged on Madrid and other cities to vent their frustration over mass unemployment and government austerity measures. In the Arab world, a wave of unrest that toppled governments began with a protest over a lack of economic opportunities in Tunisia.
* * *
Global Leaders to Ponder Over Lows of Capitalism
India's Economic Times reports:
DAVOS, Switzerland -- Snowclaws and snowboots have been packed, diaries confirmed, reconfirmed and changed a hundred times, and invitation lists compared with a "see you somewhere then" as over 19 heads of state, more than 15 central bankers, assorted European royalty, and over 2600 of the great and mighty of global business descend on a remote ski resort high in the Alps of for the annual WEF schmoozefest.
This year, there's more than a hint of irony in the event that created the concept of the quintessential "Davos Man", that global super-achiever into disrepute after 2008: some of the richest people in the world, and companies who have paid millions to sponsor the event, will pontificate on the failings of capitalism and inequality before slipping off for vintage champagne dinners and parties. [...]
It's unlikely that any of them, or the top businessmen busy closing private deals in the bilateral meeting rooms or hotels, will drop in at the Occupy camp near the station outside the Davos security cordon, where protestors are camping out in -- yes, igloos and heated teepees - to protest against everything Davos stands for.
"Capitalism, in its current form, no longer fits the world around us. We have failed to learn the lessons from the financial crisis of 2009. A global transformation is urgently needed and it must start with reinstating a global sense of social responsibility," said Klaus Schwab, of WEF. Its recent global risks report highlights rising inequality as the biggest threat facing the world in future. Will anyone be listening to him?
* * *
George Soros on the Coming US Class War
George Soros, in an interview with Newsweek magazine titled “George Soros on the Coming US Class War”:
“I am not here to cheer you up. The situation is about as serious and difficult as I’ve experienced in my career,” Soros tells Newsweek. “We are facing an extremely difficult time, comparable in many ways to the 1930s, the Great Depression. We are facing now a general retrenchment in the developed world, which threatens to put us in a decade of more stagnation, or worse. The best-case scenario is a deflationary environment. The worst-case scenario is a collapse of the financial system.” [...]
Soros draws on his past to argue that the global economic crisis is as significant, and unpredictable, as the end of communism. “The collapse of the Soviet system was a pretty extraordinary event, and we are currently experiencing something similar in the developed world, without fully realizing what’s happening.” To Soros, the spectacular debunking of the credo of efficient markets—the notion that markets are rational and can regulate themselves to avert disaster—“is comparable to the collapse of Marxism as a political system. The prevailing interpretation has turned out to be very misleading. It assumes perfect knowledge, which is very far removed from reality. We need to move from the Age of Reason to the Age of Fallibility in order to have a proper understanding of the problems.”
Occupy Wall Street “is an inchoate, leaderless manifestation of protest,” but it will grow. It has “put on the agenda issues that the institutional left has failed to put on the agenda for a quarter of a century.”Understanding, he says, is key. “Unrestrained competition can drive people into actions that they would otherwise regret. The tragedy of our current situation is the unintended consequence of imperfect understanding. A lot of the evil in the world is actually not intentional. A lot of people in the financial system did a lot of damage without intending to.” Still, Soros believes the West is struggling to cope with the consequences of evil in the financial world just as former Eastern bloc countries struggled with it politically. Is he really saying that the financial whizzes behind our economic meltdown were not just wrong, but evil? “That’s correct.” Take that, Lloyd Blankfein, the Goldman Sachs boss who told The Sunday Times of London at the height of the financial crisis that bankers “do God’s work.” [...]
While Soros, whose new book, Financial Turmoil in Europe and the United States, will be published in early February, is currently focused on Europe, he’s quick to claim that economic and social divisions in the U.S. will deepen, too. He sympathizes with the Occupy movement, which articulates a widespread disillusionment with capitalism that he shares. People “have reason to be frustrated and angry” at the cost of rescuing the banking system, a cost largely borne by taxpayers rather than shareholders or bondholders.
Occupy Wall Street “is an inchoate, leaderless manifestation of protest,” but it will grow. It has “put on the agenda issues that the institutional left has failed to put on the agenda for a quarter of a century.” He reaches for analysis, produced by the political blog ThinkProgress.org, that shows how the Occupy movement has pushed issues of unemployment up the agenda of major news organizations, including MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News. It reveals that in one week in July of last year the word “debt” was mentioned more than 7,000 times on major U.S. TV news networks. By October, mentions of the word “debt” had dropped to 398 over the course of a week, while “occupy” was mentioned 1,278 times, “Wall Street” 2,378 times, and “jobs” 2,738 times. You can’t keep a financier away from his metrics.
As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable. “Yes, yes, yes,” he says, almost gleefully. The response to the unrest could be more damaging than the violence itself. “It will be an excuse for cracking down and using strong-arm tactics to maintain law and order, which, carried to an extreme, could bring about a repressive political system, a society where individual liberty is much more constrained, which would be a break with the tradition of the United States.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

54 Comments so far
Show AllUm, so when those bombs go off, the massive firepower and troops go in, the killer-mercenaries-for-hire descend, all at capitalism's corporations capital design and intent, no one really intends that people/animals/environments gets blown to bits, suffer torrid physical and social maladies, and mass social and economic upheavals and population migrations, do they? Seriously? Are all of you 1% totally daft? Or, by saying something like that, do you all just think the 99% is?
The NDAA is already fact -- there is no 'what if' scenario to contemplate, the worst has already happened.
The response to the unrest could be more damaging than the violence itself. “It will be an excuse for cracking down and using strong-arm tactics to maintain law and order, which, carried to an extreme, could bring about a repressive political system, a society where individual liberty is much more constrained, which would be a break with the tradition of the United States.”You'd think we could get these bastards, we outnumber them almost seven billion to one!
The wealthy know this would put them in great danger. So they buy armies and police forces and property far from the hoi polloi. But the world has become very small and offers no hiding places other than caves in Afghanistan.
You can use basic HTML code to create paragraphs.
The simplest way is to write < p > with no spaces, just the angle brackets around the p, at the head of each paragraph. You can use the "preview" button repeatedly to ensure you are actually creating paragraphs, before you hit the "save" button to post your final version.
That's how i'm creating these paragraphs.
None of us have come up with a reasonable explanation why one set of CD posts automatically accept your line breaks, while the other set of CD posts do not. But that is the way it is!
The system was just fine when it allowed workers here to benefit from the destruction of poor countries. What many want, and what the leaders seem to want, is to make capitalism "work". That means to spread the benefits a little more evenly so radical calls for change are fought off. The system hasn't "gone too far" or "gotten out of control", its the same god damned system. The victims and who benefits from the system is the only real change, so boo freaking hoo to the pro-capitalist workers in the West.
This is all in addition to the worldwide environmental and ecological collapse we are causing. There is no way capitalism can solve those problems, it will only and has only made the situations worse. My guess is that if the system is reformed so the benefits in the West are more widely shared then some of the wind behind the sails of OWS will go away. All this talk of economic justice, it is just for the new victims of the system. Some of these people can be and will be bought off, then they'll go back to mindless conspicuous consumption and their suburban lives. The majority of the world's people, who have always been left out of the the benefits of the capitalist system, will continue to suffer. Liberals in the US, and so called social democrats in Europe, suck and aren't tons different or better than their friends on the right. All hot air, little understanding of the fundamental problems of the system and no, NONE, alternative vision on how to run the economic system. There are pockets of non-capitalist development and theoretical alternatives, but not nearly enough people are willing or able to rally around any alternative. So, we have this talk of making capitalism "better". Better for who? How can capitalism deal with the ecological and environmental crisis?
I agree that the movement is world wide, but it is at the present time very ideologically diverse. We agree that the current system sucks. Do we agree what to replace it with? How many are even aware of possible alternatives? Lots of work left to do.
"We need a fair economic system tilted towards the environment" — a radio quote after 9/11 from a G8 member.
3/4 of the world's food is still grown by low-energy, local means, and people living in cities take up far less space and use fewer resources than others in developed countries.
IN THE US — We need to stop legal loopholes, stop the chokehold the DemoReps have on our laws (a 'party system' has been feared in our past) and make sure any activity is well regulated and overseen.
Obama has done well in forcing industries who are breaking laws to stop it, and in protecting the environment, from Phosphates in Dishwasher soaps, for instance.
We need to restrict or tax damaging activities so much that it's more profitable to do something else. A Carbon Tax ($25 - $30/ton of released CO2) would greatly lower our GHG releases. Each $1/ton would cost only about 1 cent/gallon of gasoline.
We need government to collect from the rich: THEY didn't sweat for their profits — they mostly pay others to earn it for them! So what if they have to pay $.80 to the gov't for each dollar earned? (It was about that before Reagan cut it down, and it got put up to $.40 then cut again, with Republicans cutting it.)
WORLDWIDE — To make it fair nations sign a treaty agreeing to tax pollution in their own borders and collecting a large import duty (to cover non-signers' pollution).
I'd give each nation the same fraction of its' taxes, and I'd use rest to pay for LifeBoats (preserving lands used to support indigenous peoples).
I'd give a credit to each non-earning person. Where ecologists and users want it, I'd install windmill-driven wells, segregated sewage pipelines (fertilized water for farming, herding, and wilderness), and raising and planting local and useful trees.
Middle class cons are only separated from OWS by oligarchy propaganda about evil liberals, jingoism and superstitious dogma. And liberal OWS are only separated from Tea Partiers by oligarchy propaganda about evil guns, meat and beer.
Direct democracy
...peace...
and the children will lead them
Attempting to put out a fire by heaping more fuel upon it is clearly an exercise in futility.
If your house is burning you have basically two options; do nothing and allow the house to burn to the ground or extinguish the fire completely and rebuild your house making sure it is totally fireproof this time.
A problem cannot be solved by applying more of the same reasoning and principles that created it.
The for-profit, kapitalist paradigm is an unsustainable, unspeakably evil, criminal enterprise. It is the problem. It is the fire burning down the house.
Unless and until it is completely extinguished, what we'll get is what we've got and have had for many centuries. In due time the house will be completely destroyed and nothing will remain.
This existing system cannot be fixed. The reason for this is quite simple; it's not broken! It is functioning exactly as desired for the small minority that controls it. They are the fire-starters, a group loosely referred to as bankers or financiers.
That minority, along with the lapdogs and sycophants from the corporate and political classes, is a parasitic infestation within the human species and upon the body of Gaia. The parasites are controlling the hosts and killing them at an ever increasing pace. The parasite must be extirpated.
When your house is burning, you don't take the fire from the living room and move it to the dining room to "fix" the problem. We've got to put out this fire completely, tear down the ruins and build a completely new, fireproof house.
Unfortunately most of us, the 99%, have been so indoctrinated to the top-down, hierarchical systems that have ruled us for millennia, we can't conceive of doing things any other way. Even when it gets bad enough to arouse a bit of rebelliousness in us, all we seem to do is meekly plead for the system be "repaired".
Only the complete demolition of the existing system and its replacement with an entirely new, non-profit, open civil society will suffice. It's time for us to finally become civilised.
Populations are now so receptive to blindingly successful systems of indoctrination that willful ignorance has become the new intellectualism.
We have been conditioned to comply rather than question. Ideological "belief", blind loyalty, patriotism and faith trump rationality and critical thinking every time. "My country right or wrong!" Think about it if you can.
We have been trained to "believe" that competition is better than cooperation. We so believe regardless that common sense and experience show clearly, repeatedly and incontrovertibly the complete opposite to be true.
Competition is merely a euphemism for war. As anyone knows, in any such scenario, if someone is to win, someone else must lose. To the winner go the spoils.
Now, after centuries of cleaving to this ill-conceived, regressive paradigm, despite overwhelming evidence of its utterly destructive nature, we have a class of parasite, the "1%", that has finally "won" the "competition" and is sucking the Life out of Life on a global scale.
The sustenance of the parasites, today known as "capitalism", with its all-encompassing program of globalisation, a usurious, privatised monetary system based upon fraudulent commodity money and the for-profit paradigm of gluttonous, unrestrained consumerism must be utterly eliminated.
That fire must be drowned, leaving not so much as a smoking ember. No chance can be left for this conflagration to ever be rekindled. Thus deprived and isolated, the parasites will die off. They are utterly non-productive, incapable of self-reliance and can only survive by the labor and deprivation of others.
Parasitism is an aberration. Life is ultimately a symbiotic process. Given a chance to evolve within the constraints of natural law, the human species could become a fully functional partner in the Life process.
The Universe is yet emergent and humanity nascent.
The consummation of the marriage of Mammon and Mars has produced an offspring that relishes in and profits from destruction and death. If the small minority that worships this monstrous deity is allowed push the rest down a path that is clearly suicidal, our species will never attain its full potential.
The creatures we named dinosaurs dominated Life on Earth for over 200 million years before succumbing to natural forces beyond their comprehension. Not their fault. Could happen to anyone.
After a paltry 200 thousand years, the species Homo sapiens teeters on the brink of extinction as a result of its own hubris and recklessness. Nobody's fault but our own.
That the critical moment we now face would come was clear to me at least 30 years ago and I've tried to warn people of it most of my Life. Being a mere blue collar labourer, without "credentials", my voice was never heard.
Now that the credentialed pundits are announcing old news as new and the masses are finally responding tepidly to the oppression that has been building stealthily around them for so long, I fear it's too little, too late.
The momentum of this Imperial cycle has passed the Rubicon. The sad and bloody folly that passes for human history will be repeated yet again. This time, I'm afraid the blood will bathe the entire world.
In my opinion, if the protests, demonstrations and civil disobedience in amerika escalate and start to gain momentum, cohesion and broad support, our ostensible government will make the dictatorships we allegedly oppose, even though many if not most were installed by us, appear benevolent by comparison.
The hypocrisy of Hilary Clinton, condemning various tyrannical regimes for using violence against peaceful protesters, whilst our militarised police are doing exactly the same, is simply nauseating.
We are a global family, community, tribe, clan; whatever descriptor you pick, we are all fundamentally the same, bound together by Life.
It's time to recognise that this is an asset, embrace it and use it for the benefit of all.
It is time for the parasites that profit from death to be cut from the body of humanity once and for all.
If not, then in this time of cancerous kapitalist globalisation, what has happened to the least of us will soon happen to all save a privileged few who will fiddle with gluttonous glee while burning down the house…once and for all.
"There is no way to Peace. Peace is the way."
A.J. Muste
http://hamsayeh.net/world/1329-burning-down-the-house.html
good article.
Capitalism and most economic theory is ideology not science. They're not even based on rational principles for the most part.
Essentially they're just religions of greed; Mammon worship. The priesthood, economists, bankers and financiers, claim esoteric knowledge of these mystical, avarice driven alchemies for which they create new spells and potions as needed.
They then pronounce themselves the experts in these arcane practices and, through the use of obscure insider language, terminology and convoluted rules and procedures, make their activities incomprehensible to anyone not a member of the prelacy.
You may find the writing style at the link below a bit archaic and therefore something of a challenge, but the wealth of information and knowledge to be gleaned is well worth the effort.
http://www.perfecteconomy.com/
As John Maynard Keynes once said; "capitalism is mans exploitation of his fellow man, communism is the reverse".
Oh, and thanks for the tip on separating paragraphs.
It seems to me that the systems in place have be purposely designed to be easily corrupted.
As long as a nations' monetary system is allowed to be privately controlled, for profit, it cannot help but be corrupt.
"Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nations laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile."
William Lyon Mackenzie King, the tenth Prime Minister of Canada from December 29, 1921 to June 28, 1926
The issue and control of a nations currency should be permanently vested in the appropriate branch of the nation's government.
The simplest step that could be taken to alleviate the problems with the monetary system would be to permanently outlaw usury, using the earliest definition of that practice we can find.
Like any source of information, the bible can contain that which is utter nonsense but there may also be found principles that make perfect sense.
"12 In you men accept bribes to shed blood; you take usury and excessive interest [a] and make unjust gain from your neighbors by extortion. And you have forgotten me, declares the Sovereign LORD."
The cited revision of the Old Testament above relates a forbidden behavior to excessive interest.
The word "excessive" however has recently been introduced to the re-translation; and so only if we refer to a footnote [a] can we return toward the actual translation / meaning: a. Or usury and interest.
Where does the word "excessive" come from, particularly if there wasn't even an equivalent term for the word "interest," and either usury or interest could only be deduced from the metaphors which originally comprised the expressions?
Here is an even earlier translation of the same paragraph of Ezekiel 22: "12 In thee have they taken gifts to shed blood; thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou has greedily gained of thy neighbours by extortion, and hast forgotten me, saith the Lord God."
Here we see the metaphor carried forth. Thus "increase" was interpreted all the while to apply to what we understand to be interest/usury.
Interest therefore is usury; and because either comprises irreversible processes to but one inevitable state of dispossession, interest too is always usurious.
People For Mathematically Perfect Economy
http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-what-is-usury.html
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" -- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good" -- George Washington
"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." -- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." -- Mahatma Gandhi
The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, short swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of unnecessary implements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues and tends to foment uprisings. -- Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Shogun, August 1588
"One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms." -- Constitutional scholar Joseph Story, 1840
"The bearing of arms is the essential medium through which the individual asserts both his social power and his participation in politics as a responsible moral being..." -- J.G.A. Pocock, describing the beliefs of the founders of the U.S.
Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty, will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest. -- From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.