EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Where to Find a Trillon Dollars
Even by Washington standards, a trillion dollars is a lot of money. That's approximately the figure for the cumulative savings President Obama wants to extract from proposed federal budgets over the next ten years. While some of the money would come from closing tax loopholes and increasing the burden on individuals earning more than $250,000 per year, the bulk of it would come from domestic discretionary spending - everything from low income heating assistance to accelerated interest payments on college loans. In all, the Obama administration's freeze on non-security-related discretionary spending would result in $400 billion in reductions over the next five years. These cuts will be painful, and they will be felt in every middle- and lower-income household in America.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates holds a Pentagon press briefing to comment on the Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2012 budget submission to Congress, Feb. 14, 2011. "Only in Washington, DC can a spending increase be described as a 'cut'." (DOD photo by R. D. Ward ) By contrast, the Pentagon will barely be touched. In fact, the $553 billion proposal for the agency's base budget announced by the Obama administration today is a 4% increase from current levels. And the highly touted $78 billion in Pentagon "cuts" Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has called for over the next five years are essentially a slowing in the rate of growth of Pentagon spending. As Christopher Preble of the Cato Institute has suggested, only in Washington, DC can a spending increase be described as a "cut."
So what is to be done? We need to make sensible cuts in Pentagon spending that will address the long-term deficit problem without undermining our security. Doing so would take a lot of pressure off of domestic programs, allowing for milder cuts -- or even no cuts at all -- depending upon one's feelings about what level of deficit reduction is needed over the next decade.
The Sustainable Defense Task Force, a network of over a dozen experts (including yours truly) that was brought together last spring to address the issue of deficits and defense spending has made proposals for nearly $1 trillion in reductions in Pentagon spending over the next decade - a number comparable to the $1.1 trillion in budget savings on domestic programs contained in the Obama budget. With military spending running at post-World War II record levels in recent years, and with a steady rise for the past fourteen years, this is eminently reasonable. It is even more so when one considers that the United States spends roughly what the rest of the world combined spends for military purposes, and that the main threats out there - from Al Qaeda to nuclear proliferation - can't be meaningfully addressed by building more long-range missiles, combat ships, fighter planes, or aircraft carriers. In short, many of the most expensive items in the Pentagon' s procurement budget are irrelevant to the most urgent threats we face.
Among the items that can be cut without harming our security:
•The $238 billion Joint Strike Fighter program: Cancelling the program and relying instead on upgraded versions of current aircraft would save almost $50 billion over ten years.
•The MV-22 Osprey: Replacing this dangerous, overpriced, and underperforming aircraft with cheaper alternatives would save over $10 billion over ten years.
•Reducing the number of U.S. troops in Europe and Asia to 100,000 from current levels of 150,000 would save $80 billion over a decade.
•Reforming Pentagon health care systems so that retirees pay modest, reasonable premiums could save $60 billion over a decade.
•Scaling back missile defense and space weapons programs could save over $50 billion over a decade.
•Further reductions in the U.S. nuclear arsenal, including deployment of fewer ballistic-missile launching submarines, could save over $100 billion in a ten year period, much of it in operating costs.
•Reducing the size of the Navy from 286 to 230 ships would save over $125 billion over ten years.
These are not radical proposals. They would average out to about $100 billion per year in cuts from a military budget that has doubled since President George W. Bush took office. In addition to the question of how relevant traditional weapons systems are to fighting terrorism and the spread of nuclear weapons, the sheer size and capabilities of U.S. forces allow for significant cuts. As Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has noted, the U.S. Navy is larger than the next 13 largest navies in the world combined, and a 11 of those are U.S. allies. And under current plans the U.S. will have an overwhelming advantage over China in top-of-the-line fighter planes for the foreseeable future, perhaps up to a 20 to 1 edge as of 2020.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

54 Comments so far
Show AllFinally! Reasonable proposals to cut the defense budget!
this is not reasonable
this is peanuts
It is truly outrageous, what we spend on the military in this country -- and how so many of those expenditures are treated as being "off the table" when it comes to budget-cutting. I've never understood why.
When I was in the Peace Corps, the program director -- a Reagan appointee! -- was fond of pointing out that the program she oversaw, which at that time sponsored something like 12,000 volunteers working in 50+ countries around the globe, operated on a budget that was less than what the U.S. spent annually on its military bands.
Military bands!
We, as a nation, have our priorities seriously f***ed-up.
Seems the money we spend on our military is what is undermining our security!
That may be a very important part of the big plan. GRIN.
It's called the "repeat business" model.
http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-175-the-rand-corporation-exposed/
Agree we need spending cuts and agree we should start with military spending cuts but few in Washingon are listening.
Now let's go back to December. Not two months after Obama signs a tax reduction package (with a token amount for unemployment benefits) that will cost the US $850 billion, Obama now is looking to cut $1 trillion from government spending because he says the US can't run such high budget deficits. If he simply didn't pass the tax cut, we'd be near break even right now. He is simply using the Republican "starve the beast" budgt tactic.
"Progressive101"
2 things.
1. That "token" reduction you mentioned was an attack on the amount paid into Social Security in order to begin depleting it.
2. It is no longer a "republican" tactic. It is THE method preferred by Wall Street and thus, by Washington - almost entirely.
Sorry people but playing nice with the Pentagon won't cut it. When we can give major cuts to non-military related programs that hurt us, there's no reason to not give major cuts to military related bs. Here are some reasons I have in mind.
1. Jobs. How long are we gonna allow more employment to be tied to the Military Industrial Complex? The metal being wasted on bombs and guns could be used for expanding railroads.
2. Environment. Aren't we forgetting all too often that the military has been made to be the biggest energy hog thanks to bloating its budgets since WWII ?
3. Austerity itself. It has been brought up that the real meaning of austerity is being sabotaged by creating double standards on spending cuts. There's no reason to create one set of rules for non-military related social programs and another for military spending.
4. Defense itself. We need to get back to the real meaning of defense such as health care and safety from violent outbursts that are 90% rightwing here in the country itself. The majority will never figure this out until war spending is drastically reduced. It's disingenuous to call war spending "defense" spending. The true meaning of defense is about caring and not invading and occupying. The nature of occupying another nation is like a man controlling a woman physically or mentally and this brings me to my next point.
5. Helping men respect women and even women respecting women. I'm still unable to shake away from what a brave feminist recently told me about feminism being dead in America while shining high in Europe. She proved that feminism has been making inroads even throughout Asia and Africa where male oriented dominance used to define past traditions and cultures. Her biggest sorrow was women fighting each other and I told her that I too felt bad about this. I don't blame her for her anger and sadness. There's no doubt that serious reductions in military spending would go a long ways towards more men embracing feminism that could help them confront internal weaknesses and more women not shying away from it either.
By the way, I don't think feminism is dead but the MIC has become too much of a monster that we're in a Catch-22 where we either fight fire with fire and risk losing compassion or we play nice and risk losing to tyranny. It's no different than the war between practical and ideal.
Reasonable proposals! Also why do we need 725 military bases around the world?
Taking away winter heating oil from the poor while cutting taxes for billionaires is obscene.
Exactly. We have a goonsquad disguising as a government.
This is how it happened since 1948:
http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-175-the-rand-corporation-exposed/
Washington DC is the centre and main propagator of collective psychosis on the planet today. Not only are the politicians of the US psychotic, they are criminally insane! They spread their psychic virus through the main stream media, which is a culture for morphing the primary virus into countless variations of insanity. Most of the US citizenry exposes themselves to this psychic warfare (psy-ops) daily and have succumbed to the viral psychic toxins exuding from the cable and satellite networks!
You get what you pay for.
And if you pay for military, you will get war.
It's not rocket science.
We cannot NOT pay! This is an incredible and very tight scam! The Banks, the War Machine, congress, so on. All united in robbing us. And they have been succeeding and increasing their loot every year. They are all psychopaths created and maintained by us, the taxpayers of this country. And the most hilarious of all is that these top goons don't even pay taxes! They have their buddies create loopholes just for them. We are their mere slaves. They control us 100%. Very tight knot. I have no clue how to untangle this, if at all possible before this country becomes a 3rd world country. It is already the very first under-developing nation!
I'd have to take umbrage with the author's statement: "While some of the money would come from closing tax loopholes and increasing the burden on individuals earning more than $250,000 per year"
When has Obama done this?
he may have spoken those words but Obama has proven to be a lying schmuck - he extended the tax breaks for the richest -
If he would have allowed them to expire he would have had more savings than his cuts provide -
Obama is a lying hypocrite, corporate, fascist loving, reptilian, warmongering neo-con -
I'm sick of these "If Obama just did these things" BS articles - Obama is NEVER going to do any of these things - just as bush would never had done them -
I have a better chance waking up as Kobe Bryant and playing basketball for the Lakers than Obama turning into a progressive!
All sweet talk and absolutely no action on anything that concerns us, the slaves! The only actions are for the filthy rich that are his direct reports! Obama is a War salesman. His job is to instigate wars and sell lots of ammo, guns, heavy equip to all parties. The longer the conflict the better. More money going to the banks who finance all of this because not even all our taxes suffice anymore. The Fed just keeps printing and the government just keeps on perception control. They are doing this ALL OVER THE WORLD!!! All taxpayers of the planet are "volunteering" their taxes to the war corporations and the banks. It one hell of a pyramid scheme and we are all at the very bottom just getting totally screwed and doing nothing about it!
Missed the mark here William. What we need ARE radical proposals and radical actions. The zealots in the MIC are the true extremists who threaten our everyday lives with their colossal theft of our labor and resources as manifest in the expenditures of the US War Machine.
Additionally, Hartung at the end of his piece, slyly slips in the propagnda noise about "terrorists" thusly legitimizing the very notion that was manufactured by the forces he is ostensibly, though mildly, speaking against.
If this is the reasonable voice that is held up as the opening position in attempting to negotiate with these Wall St./MIC psycopaths we are in trouble.
We ARE in trouble.
I agree. This piece is thin gruel.
swords to plowshares...
We should eliminate 90% of ALL military spending...which includes uniformed folk, spooks of all stripe, nuclear weaponry...in fact weaponry of all kinds...ships, tanks, airplanes, satellites, etc. Our considerable resources should go to raising the standard of living for our own citizenry AND genuine humanitarian aid to others in the world who are blessed with less.
If we actually did these things we would win true allies who would leap to defend us if we were ever threatened. THAT would be an effective "defense."
... and over 1000 military bases all over the planet!
Absolutely! You got it 100% Now for the even harder part of this conversation which is what do we do about it? Why can't we sue the hell out of all these goons? Isn't that the American way? No revolution, just a huge law suit to break them all and a big jail sentence!
What can we expect when we have gone from being recognized as citizen's of this country to consumers who have nothing to say except keep buying stuff.
"Sustainable Defense Task Force" , another new excellent Orwellian term. They want to make sure the "perpetual war for perpetual peace" is sustainable---a word they must have co-opted from Al Gore. Why are the things people really need, like heated houses in the winter, considered "discretionary", while lasers(Reagan's ray-guns?) in space are "essential to national security?
Right-on, John Savage!
George Lakoff has opened our eyes to the power inherent to language frames.
I'd like to see the following words come under the scrutiny they deserve:
Enemy.
National defense (masking the make-war-for-profit state)
Entitlements (only when they apply to people, evidently NOT the case when benefits extend to corporations)
Derivative (modern word for SCAM on a grand scale!)
Since all of our politicians have all their money invested in the stocks of the military industrial complex companys. It is a pipedream to think they are going to loose money by cutting the pentagon budget. As their portfolio fatten, they are looking for more military projects, like maybe let'snuke Iran. We are on the Neo cons path of continuous war. Thiskeeps their wallets fat at the expense ofthe country and its Children. I remember the huge outcries from musicians and movie start during the Vietnam war. Where are the protests over a war in a county, that never threatened us. Our Children are dying for the sole purpose of fattening the bank accounts of our elected officials. Boy is our country getting ducked yo.QQ
The Majority of What Americans pay in Taxes are used for Military Budgets and paying off the Debt of Paper money to the federal reserve.
(Military Murder and Paying DEBT on Our own Money - Insane)
Maybe we should all just stop paying taxes, then there would be no money for the Military Empire which is the united WAR states government.
Sometime we need to take extreme measures to get things done, look at Egypt for an example of that!
or we can go on sitting behind our computers whining about how unfair life is.
Yes !...stop paying Blood Money to the war criminals in congress, the white house and the military !
Sorry, they have that covered! They will use the power of the State to bully the hell out of anyone who attempts not to pay their taxes! You will be so harrassed until you finally give up and pay. Same as torture!
Absolutely. And they could not care less for the quality of the junk they sell us, only the profit. Same as Fox News with facts. They only care about how much they can charge their second! As far as the audience goes, it is very similar. Why do people volunteer? They fall prey of the perks! On TV people fall prey of the precious adrenaline rush they got addicted to.
V.P: Fine analysis: As usual!
METAL: Excellent post, too.
VP as was said above, this is it in a nut shell. The question of goals brings to mind the total disconnect that the last "successful" action that this amazingly inflated military has managed was the invasion of Granada......
They could not defend the country against 4 civilian aircraft. They Afghanistan and Iraq have been examples of the wrong idea made worse by the application of incompetence shot through with, lack of adequate training, lack of discipline, bad moral, and war crimes. So despite all the hype and bull about those brave heroes, and all the problems of mental health, drugs and post traumatic stress that running an empire takes, the American taxpayer appears to be getting a pretty shoddy bank for an enormous buck or several trillion of them.
Oh ya, and then there is the little matter of the accounting which Rumsfeld briefly pointed to a matter of 2.3 trillion on 9-10-01, or about a 1/4 of the budgets:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU
No, it is a racket and the racketeers hold the guns, the purse strings, the secret ears and eyes and all the media talking heads and the American sheeple are not about do a Tahrir Square on them, and believe me that and more is what it would take.
The Military has become the biggest employer in the 21st century. Im amazed when I travel America and especially the Midwest, Prairie States that seemed to be everyother person in the neighborhoods serves in the Military or Reserve units. Reserve Units have become secondary "Cash Cow" Employment for people. Some make more money on Deployment in Iraq then they do at the regular Jobs. Plus after 20 years Reserve time they get a pension when there 62, Military Care, VA. other types of assistance. 20 year Active military have become the 1st career to jump to a Govt. job waiting when they retire. I hate to attack the Members of the Armed Services and I m a Veteran and eligable to retire from my State Job. The conservatives attack public employees and our Unions and they won't say a word about the Military employees/Service Members.
The Pentagon's 553 billion $ annual budget and the U.S. support of over 700 military bases on foreign soil...that is the real terrorism that needs to be exposed for what it is!
Beside weapons and pot, what else do we have to sell?
The single most outrageous aspect of Obomber's budget proposal is his INCREASE in military spending when we already annually spend well over two and a half times what we spent on peak Cold War Pentagon budgets when we faced the nuclear arsenal of the Soviet Union. We have NOTHING to show for ten years of our oil/terror wars but the global and domestic proliferation of terrorists, terrorist attacks and attempted terrorist attacks. We have not rebuilt the infrastructure or the economies or democratized the governing institutions of Afganistan or Iraq (where there is spreading civil unrest and ongoing horrific IED bombings on a weekly basis). Our gutless "mainstream" corporatist press and sold-out politicians don't have the courage or integrity to question our failing strategy and tactics in the "global war on terror." Now our dictatorial allies in the oil sheikdoms face the spreading threat of civil insurrections copying those in Tunisia and Egypt and the U.S. is on the wrong side of history siding with those dictators, failing to conserve energy inside the U.S., becoming MORE dependent on oil imported from unstable regions, and further infuriating average Muslim citizens in the oil sheikdoms.
Sec. Def. Gates and Obomber are proposing $78 Billion dollars in Pentagon "cuts" spread out over 5 years that do not take into account the actual yearly costs of these quagmire wars but only the Pentagon's basic operations budget. A realistic cut would be $140 Billion EVERY year for three to four years, commensurate with a domestic Green New Deal to employ returning veterans and unemployed civilians. Veterans returning from these botched occuvasions already have a higher unemployment rate than the domestic civilian "official" unemployment rate and their rates of home foreclosures are soaring.
Our domestic and foreign policy priorities are ass-backwards, purely corporate-serving, and intensely stupid and short-sighted on all fronts. We are governed by the reigning oligarchs and their political puppets as if we are planning for the 19th century and not the 21st.
"Now if you are speaking of providing tax incentives or regulatory relief for targeted industries, different story."
Creating or re-creating long-term domestic manufacturing jobs as long as the "free trade" regime is tolerated is the FANTASY--regardless of how much "tax incentives or regulatory relief" is given to the neo-liberal corporatists in the upper-class. They've already concentrated more wealth, political and mass media power in their own hands over the last 30 years than even in the Gilded Age.
"Subsidized jobs are not real jobs because they don't last past the subsidy."
Historically speaking, big government jobs programs like FDR's Works Progress Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps did not last past their subsidies, and they were only partly helpful in getting America out of the Great Depression by providing constant stimulation of domestic demand, but they got tens of millions of Americans THROUGH the Great Depression that lasted from 1929 to roughly 1942. Millions of Americans would've starved to death or sickened and died in the streets like the victims of Soviet forced migrations in the 1920s and 1930s had it not been for New Deal subsidized jobs programs.
We have real unemployment of tens of millions of Americans who urgently need jobs to get them through this class-split-level Recession/Depression that could last another ten to fifteen years--"many years" as Ben Bernanke keeps saying.
The real economy underlying the "financialized" Wall Street economy of endless speculatory asset bubbles has been devastated by 16 years of "free trade" and lack of adequate investment to remedy our $2.3 Trillion dollar infrastructure deficit. Other nations are spending big to invest in green tech--to invest in their already more competitive future--while Amurka's right-wing clucks whine about more tax incentives and "regulatory relief" for dinosaur companies that, given those goodies, still wouldn't create enough jobs to put a dent in the rising level of long-term unemployment and give lip service to internationally competitive public education improvements they don't intend to pay for.
I believe a comprehensive Green New Deal would create long-lasting jobs that outlive initial subsidies because it would substantially reconfigure several major industries in the U.S. requiring new technological and maintenance workers to upgrade and maintain these new systems and components. These industries would include among others, heating, ventilation and air conditioning technologies, the entire electrical grid, a nationwide network of clean (wind turbine or solar powered) electric car refueling stations, private energy surplus sales & related technology, green vehicles of all kinds, biodegradable packaging, high speed rail linking many more cities, more energy efficient residential and commercial real estate structures, national access to high-speed broadband, etc.
Obama speaks softly, the good cop to Bush's bad cop, but still recklessly fights on in the middle east. These efforts include our general to general talks with Egypt, which further empower the military takeover.
Ron Paul calls for taking our troops of out Iraq and Afghanistan--saving us billions. Bravo Ron Paul.
As for social security--I'm waiting for the President as well as the media to note that social security takes in more then it gives out-- and, believe it or not, runs a surplus. I wish the politicians and media would admit that they've taken money out of this fund and used it for other purposes. (Under Reagan, Greenspan arranged an increase in the SS tax rate so as to keep it funded over the years-- but then they took the money from the fund and used it elsewhere--in other words, it was a sneaky Reagan tax increase. What a country!
The politicians who advocate the privatizing of Social Security do not seem to understand that this will making war more difficult.
The military will be scaled back when our country goes broke and we aren't able to afford our empire anymore, not before. Don't expect any traction in this arena / ain't gonna happen .....
Let's be clear, we don't avoid cuts for the sake of national defense. We avoid them because they are propping up our economy. If we cut the military it would devastate our economy. It's how the right can actually stay Keynesian without admitting it. Republicans will actually (and have) make the argument that closing bases and reducing spending will result in losses of jobs. The left needs to understand it because it has to propose a way to convert military bases to some other way of providing jobs. Veterans need other ways of receiving an income and so forth. The city of San Diego would be crushed if the navy were significantly cut. It's a sad and ironic fact that the republicans are closet Keynsians but watch out, in a couple of years there will be a left-right alliance based on this principle. Let's start now with conversion proposals so that we don't get our economic policies hijacked by soldiers looking for the status quo. You will wake up one day and Fox News will explicitely say governments need to spend money to prop up demand. Instead of them making the argument that we need to spend on military lets switch to infrastructure. The army core of engineers could build high speed rail networks for example. Lockheed-Martin could design maglev trains, etc. Yes, this is state-run capitalism but this is the model Asia uses and it works for them. And we use it too, for bombs though and not bullet trains.
This could be done if we had a president with balls. Not the case!
KRONOS: All that manpower could be used to rebuild the nation! Wasn't it The Army Corps of Engineers that gave the U.S. bridges and dams failing grades? All that manpower could get inside the ghettos and lead unemployed youth in projects to take PRIDE in rebuilding their communities, block by block. All that manpower could help GREEN the nation's infra-structure and technology. If so much wasn't aimed at the latest ways to efficiently murder thousands and thousands of people, something CREATIVE and CONSTRUCTIVE might be done with all those human bodies, trained for labor and loyalty.
This is why I think deconstructing the word DEFENSE, along with that of SECURITY, could unravel the labyrinth that amorally justifies so much treasure being endlessly wasted on such deadly (as well as sickening) goals.
By the way, the bullet trains are also a fine idea.
I am sorry to say this, no offense, but it seems to me that most people here are ignoring the huge elephant in the room: the war scam! This president like most of them, are all in on this. They do not represent the people. Surely, they do represent some of the people of this country but not you and me. Well, definitely not me! It is clear, crystal clear, that they represent the monster created by an enormous corporate greed. Here are some of the top names of this pyramid scheme: Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Boeing, GE, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America among many others. On the corrupted side you have Congress, The Pentagon, The Supreme Court and the Office of the President of the US. Those corporations are completely out of anyone's control, and are the number one obstacle for any chance of a balanced budget and a better, friendly, peaceful, hard working country most of us could be proud of instead of totally disgusted of.
The government we have do not represent us, period! They represent arrogance, greed, irresponsibility, unaccountability, dishonesty. We, The People have been shut out from any decisions. We have become slaves that pay our masters. On the very top of this incredible Pyramid Scheme built over several WARS are the big Banks financing it all, completely in secret via the Federal Reserve and Treasury through Goldman Sachs and others.
The sooner we recognize this the sooner we can look for possible solutions to our dilemma.
Josh NC
Very well said. Your insightful comments are most reminiscent of the documentary Why We Fight. In that film, directed by Eugene Jarecki, there is a scene which shows congressperson after congressperson getting up on the House floor in order to justify why their particular state must have a particular bomber or air base and that is because their states must have these weapons of mass destruction in order to demonstrate their supposed patriotism. Their motto would appear to be: more guns but less butter.
"Almost all propaganda is designed to create fear. Heads of governments and their officials know that a frightened people is easier to govern, will forfeit rights it would otherwise defend, is less likely to demand a better life, and will agree to millions and millions being spent of 'Defense' ". John Boynton Priestly [1894-1984], English Writer
Fear is the monster at the center of our psychic labyrinth. We can only act once we lose all fear. Remember what just happened in Cairo.
Like who needs help paying the bills, with a glut of mercenary and weapons manufacturing, freeway expansion, and continued building boom "jobz" despite the crash? In my area, there's been absolutely no slowdown of the kapitalist's frantic pace of plunder and CON(de)struction.
In my area we re now surrounded by the War Machine on a new front: IT contractors for the Federal Government! Yet another scam! More profit paid for by your friendly taxpayer with a little help from the Federal Reserve backroom-deals window.
THIS is what the US Military is up to.
http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2011/02/14/us-air-force-c17-transport-caught-smuggling-arms-and-drugs-into-argentina/
A manifest provided by the US did not list war materiel and drugs which were seized by Argentine authorities.
>>Among the confiscated materiel were communications interception equipment , encrypted communications equipment, sophisticated GPS devices, high power rifles, a machine gun and narcotics as well as a full trunk of expired pharmaceuticals including stimulants. All boxes had the stamp of the 7th Army Airborne Brigade based in North Carolina.
So why would the US Military be smuggling drugs and arms into Argentina?
Are they planning another "insurgency"?
The US Military is the ENFORCEMENT arm of the Fascist Corporate State. They are not "defending" anything.
There is something fundamentally wrong with a nation that cannot educate its young, cannot care for its ill, cannot feed its poor yet has endless funds for war and prisons.
IÂm impressed, I need to say. Actually not often do I encounter a weblog thatÂs each educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you have got hit the nail on the head. Your concept is outstanding; the difficulty is something that not enough individuals are speaking intelligently about. I am very completely satisfied that I stumbled across this in my seek for something regarding this.
locksmith seahurst wa graviton .
locksmith in sultan wa acetotoluidide .
locksmith indian hills co homozygoses .
locksmith hood lesser .
locksmith in milton wa vibrant .
locksmith sacramento mesorectum .