Nadler: Obama Violating Law By Not Investigating Bush
WASHINGTON - Even as the issue of torture appears likely to burst back onto the public agenda next week -- thanks to the much anticipated release of an internal CIA report -- one of the most progressive voices in Congress is arguing that the Obama White House has a legal obligation to investigate the Bush torture legacy.
New York Congressman Jerry Nadler, a senior Democrat on the House
Judiciary Committee, told the Huffington Post that he believed that
President Obama would be breaking the law if he decided to oppose
launching investigation into the authorization of torture.
"If they follow the law they have no choice," Nadler said in an interview this past weekend.
The logic, for Nadler, is straightforward. As a signatory of the convention against torture, and as a result of the anti-torture act of 1996, the United States government is obligated to investigate accusations of torture when they occur in its jurisdiction.
The alternative, Nadler said, "would be violating the law. They would be not upholding the law; they would be violating it."
Nadler said that a special prosecutor should handle the task, because some of the likely subjects of such an investigation worked in the Justice Department. "There is an inherent conflict interest," said Nadler," which is why you must appoint a special prosecutor. But, again, you have no choice because that's the law."
Respected by his colleagues as one of the sharpest legal minds in Congress, Nadler has taken a leading role in pushing the Obama administration to investigate its predecessor. Beyond the legal requirements, he argues that there is a moral and political imperative - lest the precedent be set that potential illegalities go un-probed. In recent weeks, Attorney General Eric Holder has hinted that he would support a special prosecutor to look into the narrow issue of whether some interrogators exceeded their instructions. But Nadler is far from satisfied with what he's seeing from DOJ.
"[Holder] was strongly inclined to support a special prosecutor," he said. "But not for the lawyers who wrote the memos justifying the torture, and not for anybody who acted within the scope of those memos; only for some local level guy who acted beyond the scope of those memos, who waterboarded with too much water or whatever."
"You must not limit it that way," he added. "Again it would be
against the law to do it because you have got to investigate everybody
involved in torture or in a conspiracy to order torture."
But Nadler is no dupe. He recognizes that this matter is complicated by
politics. He says his major concern is not whether the Obama
administration sees the legal rationale for such an investigation, but
rather whether it has the political fortitude for tackling such a task.
"If you start prosecuting the Bush people," Nadler said, "you know what is going to be said? What's going to be said is, this is politically motivated payback for the Clinton impeachment. That is what they are going to say."
"And you know that if you do this, there is going to be a tremendous pushback starting with Fox News and everywhere else," he added, "not on the merits but on the political motivation of the Obama administration for vengeance... Who needs that? So from a political point of view it is the last thing you want to do. From a point of view of reestablishing justice in this country, it is essential."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
113 Comments so far
Show AllInvestigation should conduct to make sure no president doing same mistake in future.
It sounds like the Obama Administration should get rid of FOX News and the other traitors *before* they start cleaning up the crimes of the Bush Administration.
I heard Rupert Murdoch was giving high level US government secrets to China, in return for concessions on setting up his TV and newspaper networks there.
Obama should take him in for some extreme interrogation, and find out what he has told the Chinese (including his wife/spy).
Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, and Rush Limbaugh also have ties to noted criminals and rogue nations like Columbia, Honduras and Russia. They should all be taken in for extreme questioning and possible imprisonment
If the Democrats don't play hardball with the Rethuglicans, in a few years they will be trying to impeach Obama for not enforcing the 'torture laws'.
Anything to win an election, as the Grand Oil Party says.
"The alternative, Nadler said, "would be violating the law. They would be not upholding the law; they would be violating it."
Hasn't every president, since Richard Nixon, violated "the law" and not been held accountable for those violations by our spineless, "co-equal" branch of government, otherwise known as Congress?.......The same co-equal branch of government which over the years has led many people in this country to believe that it has the "prerogative" and not the "obligation" to hold the executive branch accountable for breaking the law?
Checks & balances? The 1787 doctrine of the separation of powers - to "preclude" the exercise of arbitrary power?
What part of this doesn't Congress understand.....or are its members simply refusing to uphold their obligations under constitutional law for the citizens of the United States? Didn't we hire them to protect us from arbritrary power?
As Rousseau said: "There is no subjugation so perfect as that which keeps the 'appearance' of freedom, for in that way one captures volition itself."
The saddest joke of all is that to try the Bush administration for its many crimes in any other forum than the Internatoinal Court of Justice would be a mockery of justice.
The USA is not a 'nation of laws' it never has been and may not have enough time left to it now----to finally achieve that.
The USA is very good at reinforcing my often repeated statement;
"If the USA were another country; the USA would invade the USA to keep the rest of the world safe"
Good Luck America, you really need it.
Ragdoll
When the Libyan held responsible for the Lockerbie catastrophe was granted compassionate release by Scotland, Secretary Clinton and families of the victims in the US were crying out for the letter of the law to be applied absolutely until the man's last dying breath! And it was all over the media in the US.
But when it comes to such crimes as pre-emptive war in Iraq or torture or other violations of the Geneva Conventions by the US presidential administrations, it just never seems "convenient" to uphold the rule of law and we are served over and again the tired old cliche about "moving forward."
Ragdoll
When the Libyan held responsible for the Lockerbie catastrophe was granted compassionate release by Scotland, Secretary Clinton and families of the victims in the US were crying out for the letter of the law to be applied absolutely until the man's last dying breath! And it was all over the media in the US.
But when it comes to such crimes as pre-emptive war in Iraq or torture or other violations of the Geneva Conventions by the US presidential administrations, it just never seems "convenient" to uphold the rule of law and we are served over and again the tired old cliche about "moving forward."
Try 'Em & Fry 'Em
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
Could we get clear on something, nobodyknown? There is no democracy in the United States. I appreciate that you, I, we must go on pretending that there is, since the reality is so god-awful and such a rebuke to what Americans think is their proud history that you'd practically want to shoot yourself sooner than think about it. But it really is high time we stopped bullshitting ourselves. For just two lousy, obvious examples: (a)The 'public option' re health care being kept off the table and shit upon from a great height by all these insects who are going to drive this health-care-as-commodity thing to the point at which the population of the country is going to start dropping like flies, and then so will whatever productivity exists in a land that's outsourced everything, so will consumerism, so will 'national security'. A hefty majority favours universal health care. How much democracy are they getting? (b)
Pandora's Box is open. Get used to it. There's no fixing this fucker, i.e. returning it to some former 'normalcy'. The system, of which Obama is, perhaps reluctantly, a cheerleader, is completely screwed, and thoroughly screwing us and the world. There is only ditching Imperial America and putting one's shoulder to the wheel of David Korten's 'Earth Community'. For god's sake, check the book out. It's only one of the most important publications, if not the most important, of the last 100 years, that's all.
Pelosi is guilty of treason. The second she opened her trap and said impeachment was off the table the morning after 'winning election', I had zero doubt about her guilt. 'Political complications, etc., etc.' be goddamned.
jlohman, 'vindictive' re Bush??? Are you kidding?
The bottom explosions are clearly visible on the unedited tapes first seen and broadcasted. Evidence of thermite is very evident in some fires of molten metal took days to die down, only heat above 3000 degrees Celsius can do that and the best heat from burning oil is about half that,plus the matter of cleanl cut girders is a dead give away because nothing except thermite can do that, thermite can reach 5000 degrees Celsius and more depending on the type of thermite used. Try to follow the story of the clandestine movement of nuclear weapons sometime back. Would they be destined for BLACK WATER or some outfit like that and who in the military made those moves, or is McDONALDS NOW IN CHARGE? The only thing these criminals are good at is murder and coverups. The COWARD OBAMA and almost the entire government including the top military are supremely guilty of the most HIDEOUS WAR CRIMES EVER PERPETRATED, every crime ever imagined, they are disgusting!!
I think in the case against Bush it would be a lot easier to defend the illegal invasion of Iraq position than illegal torture. Not only is it easier to defend, it is by far the greater evil.
But both are in the category of not gonna happen.
Obama was quite chummy with Bush during the transition period.
Every President sees himself as possibly ending up in the same position. I think it is an unwritten code of conduct that President's don't pursue criminal charges against their predecessors.
I wonder what would be worse, to be tortured and then released because you were tortured illegally or to be imprisoned unjustly for 22 years or possibly the rest of your life for a connection to terrorism that did not exist. Yes, there are many Muslim U.S. citizens suffering an unusually cruel, long, sentence, not in Gitmo but in U.S. Federal Prisons,because of the Bush Administration's need to look like they were tough on terrorists. Muslims who did not have a connection to terrorist or terrorism. But if President Obama gives any of them a pardon then the Republicans will scream "soft on terrorism, Democrates are soft on terrorism". That might hurt the Democrat's chances of keeping a lead in Congress to vote for domestic policies that will make life better for Americans such as decent programs to help the poor, sick, elderly and the disabled in America. The people the Republicans only use(deceitfully) when they want to defeat a Health Care Reform Bill or other compassionate social program. I see Obama's dilema about not investigating the Bush Administration. Many Americans do not care that Bush broke so many laws. Obama will look unamerican to them if he proves it to the world. Obama would need to have faith in the many voters who are informed enough to understand that he must do what is ,right and just, under the law and not what is politically advantageous. He must investigate the Bush Administration.
PHOTO CAPTION
Following a private White House meeting with Obama, the anxious former President cowered behind a bush, saying he feared "litigious prosecutors." In a striking display of bipartisanship, President Obama personally soothed Bush. "I've got your back," long range mic's heard the President say, followed by the assurance that, "By God, this hounding of you over the past WILL stop on my watch."
How can Obama/Congress investigate Cheney/Bush for the same criminal policies/actions that Obama/Congress are still allowing and encouraging to be committed? Wouldn't Obama have to be investigated for the same criminal charges?
ThomasJefferson... August 22nd, 2009 8:35 am.....Very important documents....6 years of research and 400 footnotes. This will amaze you...do not let the length stop your reading.......
http:/www.israelshamir.net/Contributors/
Collateral_Damage_911.pdf
Hooray for Rep. Nadler.
Keep up the pressure for investigation and prosecution.
Keep asking ALL politicians at ALL public events "Why do they support Torture?"
If they aren't actively calling for enforcement of our Federal Torture Laws They Support Torture.
SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and a Special Prosecutor
For All Their Crimes
at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
"...he argues that there is a moral and political imperative - lest the precedent be set that potential illegalities go un-probed."
Yes. Exactly. That's Government 101 stuff and I was truly shocked when Pelosi and then Obama seemed to decide being pleasant to their collegues was more important than justice. A terrible, terrible precedent to leave something so grave pass into history without action against those who violated the law, as though torture was just a social gaffe.
All Obama need do is give the Justice Dept. the autonomy it should have. Let the investigation go forward and let the chips fall where they may. It seems pretty likely there's more to the authorization to torture than there was for a criminal investigation of Whitewater, and look where that led!
It's truly amazing! Obama pretends that he can refuse to prosecute Bush and Co., for their torture, etc., on the grounds that it would lead to accusations from the Right, that it would all be motivated by the desire of democrats to exact revenge over Bill Clinton's impeachment. What "desire to exact revenge" is the administration referring to? It wasn't just that the American people were made fools by a bunch of despicable and hate-driven right-wing politicians, during the Clinton impeachment trials, it was also, that the public was (and still is) continuously subjected to a campaign of Clinton bashing from all sides, so that the mention of the Clinton name, Hillary or Bill, creates, even among their defenders, a feeling that something demeaning and humiliating is about to be said. Even buffoons like Bill Maher, cannot oppose the hateful drivel that his writers force Maher to mouth, against, particularly Bill Clinton.
The point here, is that Obama need not fear blowback from the republicans, over the impeachment. A huge number of democrats bought into that impeachment, and can't stop thinking about blowjobs, and the "hateful bitch," they're constantly told, Hillary is.
Obama will never prosecute the Bush gang, for anything. Obama has been in office a short time, during which he has, in effect, conceded the government to the right. The absurd ongoing efforts to apologize for this quivering greenhorn are truly dismaying. In spite of this largely successful effort, by the republicans, to demean and diminish the Clinton name, Hillary won the "popular vote," against Obama, when they competed for the nomination.
Please, this has nothing to do with Clinton's impeachment. Obama simply can't prosecute Bush because Obama's party (and the Clinton's) was behind every Bush crime during 8 long years. Democrats were aiders, abettors, co-conspirators, facilitators, accessories and accomplices in each and every of Bush's crimes, when are you partisan Democrats waking up? Bush would drag them down with him in a New York minute.
Pelosi was in on the torture deal, Democrats voted to authorize Bush's wars then voted to fund them, they confirmed ALL his Nazi cabinet members and Supreme Court nominees. They refused to investigate 911, Katrina, illegal wiretapping or the outing of Valerie Plame among so many of Bush's atrocities. How many filibusters did we see from Democrats during 8 years of Bush? That's right: ZERO. And a filibuster only takes 40 senators. If that alone doesn't tell you that Democrats are rotten to the core, Bush's partners in crime, now Obama's, nothing will.
I don't know why people in the USA think they are trying to 'regain the moral ground' when for so long they haven't had any despite what they may think.
Only Nazi's torture?
Well right after WW2 the USA actively recruited ex-Nazi soldiers and members, using them in all sorts of things from rocketry to espionage. (project Paperclip)
The military, CIA and government actively covered up or ignored their wartime involvements such as with Reinhard Gehlen who the USA utilised to create the Gehlen Organization which also imported in a lot of ex-Nazi's such as Alois Brunner who was/is a Nazi war criminal held responsible for sending 140,000 people to their deaths in the Drancy internment camp.
The USA has cozily feted and deliberately sought after these individuals and their 'talents' to further the glorious aims of the USA.
Other places the USA has gone for inspiration has been good old Britain too for their insipid handling of suspected IRA prisoners.
Face it, the USA has been rotten for a very long time. No amount of 'let's bring America back' will work since it's so infested and the systems are either beyond redemption or just won't cut it in a world that's moved on and desperately cries out for an abandonment of all the crap that's gone before it.
It's no good beating a dead horse because you've already beaten it to death, BBQ'd the carcass, sucked the bones clean of marrow, and now you're being poked about with the sharpened skeleton as you begin to starve.
Any efforts to 'return the system to what it was' will just perpetuate what's gone on before, and don't the power mongers, elites, and bankers love that?
By all means all attempts should be made to prosecute those responsible for all manner of heinous activities but I'm pretty sure you're not going to be allowed to get very far. Perhaps a minor sacrificial lamb or two will surface but in the main things will pass by and be replaced by greater 'urgencies', real, imagined, or created.
Sure the lingering stench of what the USA has done, is doing, and will continue to do carries on and decent people of which there are many recognise all of that for what it is but unless something of a huge public groundswell, a paradigm change of thinking, a different zeitgeist adopted, then you're just going to go on like this forever....and get worse.
You had the Klu Klux Klan proudly marching up en masse on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington in 1928, huge pre-WW2 Nazi rallies in the USA, and there's still a Nazi party in the USA today....the American Nazi Party....
Anyone surprised that Bush's grandfather dealt with/for the Nazi party?
For a nation that prided itself on supposed values it must come as quite a shock to find out that for the most part it's been a charade which only covered up America's empire building either by military force, economic warfare, subversion and assassination either directly or by proxy.
Couple that together with a ridiculous adherence to sky-god religion that cherishes ignorance over intelligence & human compassion, then you have a continuing festering abscess in your society that you'll never evolve from.
It's a pity because decent intelligent people in the USA have got plenty to offer the world rather than the war, famine, and pestilence that's got the upper hand at the moment.
The United States of America used torture long before World war 11. They used it in the Philipines during the peoples rebellion there for independence. Hundreds of thousands of Filipinos were killed by US forces and buried in mass graves.
When the US decided it could not defeat the rebels as long as the people supported them, they took the war to the people destroying rice crops and burning down villages.
This taking the war to the people and making war on woman and children had ample precedent in the Civil War.
Ulysses S grant gave specific orders to his generals to take the war to the people. Shermans march to the sea was one of pillage and murder with MILITARY of the South bypassed while Civilian targets and infrastructure was attacked.
In the siege of Richmond Grant sent his Generals into the Shenodoah Valley to burn down farms giving orders that NOTHING was to be left wherin even a crow would have to pack its own rations when entering that area.
The Native Americans sided with the french for the most part in the French and Indian wars because compared to the British the French were saints. These same tribes allied with the British against the peoples of the United Sates of America because the "Americans" were even worse.
The revisionists, the Militarists, the lovers of Violence and Murder and Torture and slaughter and war on woman and children turned all of this into a "Glorius" HIStory.
and as filipino - i know that part about the violence to put down the filipino "insurgency" which , in the old "history books" formerly utilized as part of american propaganda being that the "books" were really american products, were not really an atrocity. this is reflected in most of america's "glorious" "reports" right to this day about its past and present..about is "civilizing culture". it took a long, long time, before even those were challenged by scholarship based on native findings.
Mark Twain who learned of those atrocities was so shamed and angry that it prompted him to start his newsletter railing against "empire" and to expose america's bloody , lustful thievery in other countries.
it was also in the philippines where a platoon of black soldiers abandoned their "service" seeing that what their country was doing :creating concentration camps, etc - was the same it was doing to blacks in america.
George C. Brown - The authorization of the use of torture isn't the only thing of the Cheney/Bush Administration that needs investigating. Nor does this need to be partisan in nature: all Holder (or the Administration has to do [ or let
the Congress authorize]) is to appoint as many independent Prosecutors as might be required to have investigations of such things as authorization of torture, the firing of Federal District Prosecutors, the use of Emergency Alerts for political purposes or a real investigation of the facts relating to the 9/11 attacks.
I had a real hope that when we had a Democratic sweep of the 2008 Presidential and Congressional contests that things would change for the better - - so far most of the changs have been little more than window dressing, and K Street and the corporatizers are still running the show, to say nothing of "The Family" as well.
George C. Brown - The authorization of the use of torture isn't the only thing of the Cheney/Bush Administration that needs investigating. Nor does this need to be partisan in nature: all Holder (or the Administration has to do [ or let
the Congress authorize]) is to appoint as many independent Prosecutors as might be required to have investigations of such things as authorization of torture, the firing of Federal District Prosecutors, the use of Emergency Alerts for political purposes or a real investigation of the facts relating to the 9/11 attacks.
I had a real hope that when we had a Democratic sweep of the 2008 Presidential and Congressional contests that things would change for the better - - so far most of the changs have been little more than window dressing, and K Street and the corporatizers are still running the show, to say nothing of "The Family" as well.
Despite this article, I don't expect Congress to push Holder to conduct an honest and comprehensive investigation without fear or favor.
It just doesn't have big enough nadlers.
· Yr Obd't Servant
In the file photo from the Presidential Cloning factory model line up, wearing identical costumes, you can see the Bush model, standing behind the bush, and the Obama model standing behind the Bush. The face of the Obama model was given a slightly darker skin for voters to be able to differentiate between the models that are otherwise identical. A technical defect in reading scripts noted on the Bush model was corrected for the Obama model.
Not shown are the McCain model (whose artificial brain was misplaced), and its running mate, the Palin (who kept putting its foot in its mouth).
There were problems with the Clinton, which was seen as far too frightening, and it was decided that it would be difficult to pass it off as a human being.
But on a lighter note, as usual, Shakespeare warned us 400 years ago...
"Or in the night, imagining some fear,
How easy is a bush supposed a bear."
A Midsummer Night's Dream
The point made in the article is 100% correct. Politics are demonizing the process. It is up to the president to let the law take its course, his political advisor's feelings on the subject notwithstanding. If the US is to be a model of democracy,it must be a country ruled by law not by men.Bush made it a despotic, rogue like entity beholding to no law whether national or international, answering to his desires only. This has to change or the great democratic experiment that was the US of A is over.The president should go before the nation and tell the people that he will let the law take its course wherever that may take the country. He should make plain that he is subject to the law the same as everyone else and he cannot obstruct justice by letting politics overrule the law. It would help him if some other countries would start requesting information through formal channels as to when the US will live up to its requirements and duties under the various treaties against torture and war crimes it has signed. Maybe the president needs this formal demand to do the right thing.
Investigating the "torture allegations, will of course, turn out to be only the beginning. Once that door has been opened and a path laid down, we will find more doors.
However long it takes, a crucial door we will need to walk through has to do with demolishing the utterly flimsy and phantastic government narrative re- 9/11. This is truly a "conspiracy theory," that x number of hijackers did such and such, etc. The evidence pointing in a different direction is already in the public sphere.
And, it will not be fun to recognize where it leads and deal with the inevitable implications.
exactly.
the responsibility of the president , if nothing else, is to serve as the "leader" of a nation's LEGITIMACY to itself and to the world...whether it is in economic policies, state policies, foreign policies, social policies. the STAMP of his position, and the clarity of it , IS why he is there.
he does not make laws, he carries them out.
he does not DICTATE policy, he gives it REASON to be accepted through the strength of his commitment, right or wrong.
since the US constitution covers the making of US LAW subservient to INTERNATIONAL laws signed by the USA
"...they shall supersede..and become supreme law of the land".
such as bans against torture , prosecuting war criminals including that from the USA...
and that according to the Constitution...should a president try to conceal evidence from the people :"who..if they knew the intelligence would be less inclined to support a president's desire to go to war"...it is considered TREASON by the "executive...and congress shall begin impeachment proceedings".....etc....
then if obama denies the process that leads to the proper investigation of war crimes , torture, committed by US high officials among others
HE TOO becomes "the executive" that has "committed treason and must be removed from power".
Bush - Obama and all of them always claim
"my duty is to PROTECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE" and thus sanction treason , torture, spying, war crimes, deception, etc....
but there is nothing in the constitution that say their duty is "to protect the american people".
it is "TO UPHOLD the Protect the CONSTITUTION of the USA"
which instructs that Treaties signed into international law with the USA - such as the Geneva Conventions, Human rights, Conclusions from the Nuremberg Trial against war crimes by any nation , INCLUDING the USA (specified by the lead prosecutor from the USA) - and obama already is slipping into committing violations against not just the international treaties signed by the USA ..
but the US constitution itself.
trying to "limit it to interrogators"......is an all-too-obvious attempt to avoid doing his FIRST DUTY as president....uphold the constitution ....
NOT "Protect americans"
NOT BAIL OUT banks.
it is to UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA and the International LAws IT has signed that have BECOME PART of the Laws of the USA - as the Constitution clearly specified.
Well, don't we continue to live in interesting times.
Either we'll find out REAL SOON NOW whether Obama is a real human being who's going to try to screwdriver open the door to the start of straightening out this insulting shithole of a country (at least in the capitalism-run-amok/corporate governance/self-identity as an evilly narrow-minded, hyper-Jesused, hyper-militarized threat to the rest of the world, much of which is actually civilized compared to the U.S.), or he's yet another in the long line of puppets with guns to their heads, who shoots his face off with horseshit about hope, change, MLK, Jr., and all that crap.
We're going to find out if Obama has a spine.
Don't anyone hold their breath. I'm actually still, inasanely perhaps, giving Mr Obama the benefit of the doubt. I've been wondering since the election if maybe he's Superman, or SuperBarack or something; that he and his top fixers have an agenda to really have a crack at overturning the fucking Empire and start in to establishing what David Korten calls earth community, and that it will be quite gradually worked into place over 4 years, hopefully forestalling assassination, etc. along the way.
And then I wake up and ring up my therapist and book another appointment.
I fear the buck don't stop with Barack. I fully expect that we'll all get fucked over with some cock-and-bull story about how we mustn't squander precious political capital by going after the murderer Bush and his gang, that we must look forward and all that shit.
Political fortitude??? IF OBAMA AND HIS PEOPLE DON'T HAVE THE FORTITUDE TO GO AFTER MORE EVIL PEOPLE THAN THEMSELVES, PEOPLE WHO WERE NEVER AS POPULAR OR AS SEEMINGLY RIGHTEOUS, WHO ARE GUILTY AS SIN OF MAJOR CRIMES OF TREASON AND AGAINST HUMANITY, AND UPON THE PROSECUTION OF WHOM RESTS THE VERY MEANING OF THE COUNTRY'S SO-CALLED FOUNDING PRINCIPLES, THEN IT IS GAME OVER.
GAME FUCKING OVER.
Will someone please explain to me why any of us should be polite, circumspect or politically correct about any of this any longer? It's way too late. If Obama's not to make himself a bloody liar in every word he said in the campaign and in the inaugural, AND I MEAN BLOODY LIAR WHO MLK Jr. WOULD RISE UP OUT OF THE GRAVE TO PISS IN THE FACE OF, then he needs to get the gloves off and get down on the fucking carpet.
Here's your chance, Barack. Political blowback??? NO SHIT. YOU DON'T SAY. FANCY THAT.
Frightened of Fox and their ignorance-mongering?? Sweet Jesus Christ. Pass executive orders. Revoke citizenships. Arrest Fox's 'people' on hate charges. Here's what you do with Fox: Blow back at them twice as hard, very publically. Have a goddamn war with Fox. Call them for the imbecilic hate-mongerers they are. HIT BACK. Just like you should have hit back over the health-care town-halls and failed to.
And if they want to say that it's payback for the Clinton impeachment, let 'em. Then straighten them out on that one.
The Truth is the most powerful tool in Obama's tool box. If he doesn't use it, he will be seen as weak by ALL parties.
Then we will have to live with another Republican administration.
Barry I believe you're saying "Bring it on...!" Then what?
Like the windshield said to the bug, "Hit me again if you've got the guts."
Step back and leap forward.
Kudos on the well-executed gonzo screed, Barry! Thanks!
And it gave me a thought: do you think that someone has been dropping pinches of Kryptonite into Obama's brewskis?
The Secret Service would be well-advised to analyze any emerald jewelry worn by the royal couple.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Right on Barry. about everything. I especially congratulate your observations about fox effing news. anyone in government who is afraid of fox rants should pack up and go home
abuelo, I second that emotion.
Barry Greene August 21st, 2009 7:00 pm................Friggin gloriously beautifully said. Keep the gloves off and leave some scars, friend.
Obama has great precedent for breaking the law: Bush doing it for 8 years right before him. What exactly do you think is the reason why Obama refused to prosecure Bush? So that he could do the same exact thing himself...duh!
Exactly. Remember that time Obama joked about how He had been accused of palling around with some low down characters? He deadpanned that they were right. He was a member of the U.S. Senate. Everyone laughed. But you see, he wasn't really joking. and to get to be president, you have be MORE evil than the senators. The president is breaking the law? Can you tell me of a U.S. President that HASN'T broken the law? Laws are for the little people, not the elite politician criminal class.
How is it that "senior" Democratic leaders want an investigation NOW, when Pelosi reiterated several times that "impeachment is off the table"? The time to have acted was while the crimes were still in progress (if that is his conjecture). As another posting pointed out, Congress was itself complicit with at least MOST of what happened, albeit not all.
Jerry Nadler should FIRST start by introducing charges against Nancy Pelosi for refusing to fulfill her duties as Speaker of the House of Representatives, and not once, but several time twarting the attempts of Congressmen who tried to bring articles of impeachment to the floor.
Then, and only then, should the "honorable" (small 'h') Representative from New York worry about if the President is fulfilling his obligations of office.
Don't get me wrong. I consider the past administration criminal in every sense, but it is "history" at this point. We should have new investigations over 9/11 and I feel that the whitewash that occured in the 'official report' was made to influence the historical standings of the administration. IF we allow ourselves to get into the cycle where every past administration is 'investigated and prosecuted', we might as well put a 'banana rupublic' sticker over our flag. It is a very dangerous precedent to set! We need to READ our Constitution and hold each and every elected official accountable for his/her elected duties in a timely manner. Democracy is NOT a spectator form of government and REQUIRES citizen involvement.
nobodyknown August 21st, 2009 6:56 pm..........President or not, there is no statute of limitation to murder or complicity to murder. Please let justice take it's course and let history judge the precedents that are being set. Each time a crime is forgotten, the next crime becomes easier. That is how we wound up where we are today...by letting things slide. Murder, genocide and torture are crimes to be prosecuted. Period.
Oh, I agree that 'justice should take it's course'. BUT, fix first things first. If a carpenter is using an air gun that does not fully set the nail and has to go back and repound in each and every nail, it would be reasonable to advise the man to fix his tool FIRST, to prevent having to go back and do everything over again. Nancy Pelosi, in my opinion, has committed crimes against America through complacency and complicity. So long as she sits at the head of the Congress, we can expect more of the same. My concern is to set the machine right first, then go back and see what history will reveal.
How far back shall we go? Shall we posthumously go after FDR? Truman? Nixon?.... Okay, if we stick to just the living presidents shouldn't we go back to Carter first, and see what his role was that lead up to the taking of hostages in Iran? It has been pretty well documented that Clinton "could have" gotten Osama a couple of times..... the time he tried, might have been to take the press off of what was happening with "Monica".... Okay, Bush, the elder.... Do we investigate his CIA career and involvement with Noriega and drug running? The invasion of Panama had FAR more than the "offical" 3,000 deaths, which was documented by a Latin American film that was basically banned in the US.... Only shown once on PBS and it absolutely showed US soldiers with live prisoners of war that were subsequently shown shot to death on the ground. The shooting was not captured, but the before and after shots are undeniable.
The real time to have tried Bush/Cheney was back in 2003.... The Democrats did not however have the political power to do so until 2006/7 and then decided that they did not want to do so. I too want "investigations", however, I can almost certainly guarantee that IF charges are ever brought against a past president, each and every subsequent president will face the same fate. Should the president "investigate"? Probably, but Pandora's Box is not easily shut.
nobodyknown August 21st, 2009 7:47 pm.........I don't think this machine can be fixed. It's broken beyond repair. Deal with the most recent crimes first and we may be surprised how the dominoes start to fall. Personally, I do not care how far back we have to go to apply justice, but prosecuting the most recent deviations is of the utmost importance. You must start someplace. Are you not in favor of a re-investigation of 9/11?
If some poor soul has spent the last 15 years on death row and a recent appeal has the possibility of giving that person a new trial and possible innocence, do we dismiss that chance and just move forward because other innocent people have died previously? How about those still in prison who have a chance of vindication through DNA evidence. Do we say, "no deal", because precedents have been set and innocent humans have died erroneously?
I said before that murder, genocide and hopefully, torture has no statute of limitation.
Think of the victims friends and relatives...millions by now through these illegal wars...how do they move forward without justice? Tell them about all the other criminals/politicos that have gotten away with murder. Little comfort it will give them, friend.
If we deal with the most recent crimes, we'll have to go after Obama as he is committing war crimes as we speak (not to mention eminently impeachable offenses against the Constitution he swore to uphold.)
Going after some of the previous administration will expose the whole crime family and might circumscribe the further criminal activity that is now considered a tool of the state (i.e. corporations) by the power elite.
That was the major element Nadler failed to mention.
Of course, I would like to see justice applied to the neocon criminals, but it probably won't happen for the reason unmentionable in the mainstream.
and for Pelosi , obama and the rest of them trying to avoid prosecuting to the FULL and investigating to the FULL those that committed clear war crimes and crimes against humanity --
by saying "there are many important OTHER priorities" such as "fixing the economy" ..."the war on terror"..."finding bin laden"..."keeping our nation SAFE".........
those are all AVOIDANCE of carrying out the Constitutional demands upon them...and are poor excuses.
the "economy" will "fix itself" however it has to go.. if it can...or not.....REGARDLESS of whether they avoid or uphold the constitution.
but it is their DUTY to uphold the constitution of the USA as leaders of the USA. it cannot take a backseat to "the economy". the economy will still be there, good or bad. there have been economies that existed that did not have a constitution..
but the USA calls itself singular BECAUSE of its CONSTITUTION.
if obama and us leaders do not respect their own highest laws of the land and the international laws that their own constitution accepts to become "SUPREME LAW" of the land
then they are nothing more than speechmakers who make laws and respect laws only according to convenienve and might as well throw the entire USA constitution away..........
but LEAST never again lead americans in going around the world spouting about "laws and justice and truth".
Cheney was getting in Obama's face several weeks ago, Holder mentioned a special prosecutor and he shut his mouth.
A special prosecutor will end up appointed in a year or two; timed so that the meat is coming off the bone, a white skeleton of torture exposed in 2012.
Even Fox will find that hard to fix,
This is Obama's ace in the hole not to
be a one term president, given his betrayal
of his base. Blind Fool.
My compliments to the 1st 2 posts.
Well, yeah. But the bush to 1st investigate is that creep jeb in florida that set the whole stage for the fraudulent appointment of his brother and dick by his scrub lists, his connections with the voting machine republicans, es&s and diebold.
Then the attack of 9/11 can be investigated if for nothing else, just how 3 buildings were brought to the ground by undisputed demolitions, 2 of which were explosive and the other by implosive set charges and let this country see the tapes of what actually hit the pentagon which the fbi so conveniently confuscated and has withheld for so long.
That should get the ball rolling on w & dick's criminal careers, then we can start the obama investigations into why the financial disaster in current process was allowed to do so and the 'best and brightest' crooks that created it were NOT investigated and prosecuted but actually allowed to remain at their jobs of stealing from the people.
samosamo August 21st, 2009 6:47 pm...We all know there are no tapes of any plane hitting the Pentagon. THEY know it and we know it. Here's one of the reasons..............mathematically and physiclly indisputable, BTW......
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2009/0702-Flight77.html
I know that, but calling out another traitorous part of america in that attack, the fbi, to show what IS on those tapes that caused the explosion is of vital importance to me and I feel the rest of the country just to find the truth and start living with it along with the possibility of some culpable people being held accountable:
JUSTICE IS SERVED WHEN THE RIGHT PEOPLE ARE PUNISHED FOR THEIR CRIMES!!!!!!
samosamo August 21st, 2009 8:09 pm..............Who said anything about no justice? I am simply trying to say that they cannot show the tapes because there was no plane that hit the Pentagon. Did you check that link? The FBI's guilt is a foregone conclusion...as are the rest of those complicit in this false flag. The evidence all around is overwhelming. That is why I ask everyone to support NYC CAN and a new investigation of 9/11 to bring the guilty to justice...and that could be MANY who are still serving and in THIS current administration
Again, I say something hit(a cruise missile perhaps) or something exploded in that area of the pentagon that killed several people, I don't appreciate NOT knowing what that could have been.
And hell, no, NO plane the size of the so called 757 or whatever type was supposed to have hit could have been brought in the supposed tragetory and that low to the ground. (again I suspect a cruise missile or planted devices)
I would appreciate no answer to this because in essense we support the same thing, a false flag operation, and continual argument is counter productive.
Were you an eyewitness to the pentagon crash?
Hundreds of eyewitnesses saw an American airlines airplane crash into the Pentagon. From what position of arrogance do you pretend to make all these claims against eyewitnesses? Are you of the generation who believes that if something doesn't appear on TV, it doesn't exist?
If you look carefully at the one or two critical frames of that security camera footage, you will also see it was an airliner in American airlines livery. Recall AA livery in those days was a shiny clear-coat finished aluminum fuselage with red and blue stripes at the windows.
How can Democrats possibly investigate Bush war crimes if they themselves were co-conspirators, aiders & abettors?
Obama knows that. Democrats and Republicans started this and other wars for profit, so a real investigation is out of the question.
I just feel sorry for the stupid 60 million who voted the Black Bush into office. Blind fools. Nader and McKinney told you so.
There are laws for some and there are laws for others. You just have to figure out who are the some and others.
OBAMA is a hypocrite and a COWARD, the GENEVA CONVENTIONS clearly state if you don't investigate a war criminal you are one. In this case OBAMA THE COWARD is several times a war criminal. The entire USA is guilty of the most hideous war crime of all, deliberately STARTING A WAR FOR PROFIT (oil). The entire government should be on trial and the Government should recess until this nasty situation is resolved. Recent news releases have shown that 9/11 was a false flag operation.Link; http://newschief.com/article/20090812/NEWS/908125031/10. Read it and weep. no modern country has ever been so hideous!
Those people that died at that horrific event were more than likely murdered by their own elected officials!
tmbluesbflat August 21st, 2009 6:10 pm......My friend, I am glad you are finally seeing the light....."recent news releases?...We have been fighting for the truth of 9/11 for nearly eight years...where ya been?
Anyway, please support NYC CAN and their Novembner ballot initative.....If they cannot do it, no one can.
http://newschief.com/article/20090812/NEWS/908125031/10
I just checked that article. That info has been around a long time. For the most recent info, check out ae911truth.org and send to the 911dvdproject.com for some free videos. Good idea to subscribe to Flyby news, too.
According to the Obama administration there are so many cookies in the torture jar that it has a hard time to chose which one to eat. Moreover, Obama himself believes that all of the cookies are politically poisoned anyway and that eating even one of them will kill his chances for re-election in 2012. It is precisely the same "internal" argument used by Senator Obama and his advisers that voting against funding Bush's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan might kill his chances of becoming our next president until it became clear in the summer of 2006 that voting for funding might actually kill his chances of becoming our next president so he once voted "nay". It is not until an overwhelming majority of American voters demands the investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of highly placed persons in the Bush administration and, if necessary Bush and Cheney themselves that our "Weathervane-in-Chief" might change his mind. My opinion is that this is very unlikely to come about. Hence the Obama administration will continue to hem and haw and its Attorney General will try to make us believe that a Prosecutor who is restricted by his rules is "independent". Independent my foot.
A political bombshell may descend in the form of a long-delayed report on "torture" on the White House and the AG (who has professed having been "shocked" by its contents) coming Monday. I wonder how our "Houdini-in-Chief" will try to wiggle out from under that apparently devastating report which will finally be made public albeit probably in a form severely castrated by CIA Director Panetta to save his boss from having to act. I am pretty sure that Holder has seen the non-castrated version.
Last night Keith Olberman reported that approximately 50% of the text is "redacted" meaning blacked out. We sure need a few "leakers" of the CIA.
OBAMABLANCA
Chief of Police Obama: "I am Shocked, SHOCKED! That torture is going on in this establishment!
Floor Manager: "Sir, here are your oil pipeline winnings".
Chief of Police Obama: "See you boys in four more years...goodnight"
cheney/bush criminal enterprise should be fully investigated. Start with this. Violations of U.S. Code:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113C >§ 2340A. Torture
(a) Offense.— Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a) if—
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.
(c) Conspiracy.— A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
Over 100 detainees died in U.S. custody. Every Enlisted member of the military is taught in bootcamp what you can and can't do to EPW/POW/DETAINEES in your custody. Any military member who was involved in any Detainee abuse should be tried under the UCMJ. From the lowest private to the President of the United States should be held to the same standard. The standard of Law.
cheney/bush/rumsfeld/ashcroft/rove/card/yu/addington/libby/gonzalez/bybee etc. should be fully investigated for criminal activity. When criminal activity is found they should be brought before the Courts. When found guilty they should be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. All wealth confiscated and donated to the VA. The guilty should only be let out of prison to go empty bed pans at NMC Bethesda and Walter Reed Hospitals.
Exactly NavDoc.
Come on guys. Yea, I voted for Bush twice, and now wish I could have a do-over. I think he is going to go down in history as the most inept president in history. But I do not believe that we should be expending efforts to nail him for past bad decisions, and crush the CIA and FBI in the process. Bush bounced back from 9/11 in the best way he could. Let's bury this thing and move on to bigger and better things. Bush will get his due, but let's not be vindictive to the detriment of the country.
TWICE?? Do you have a brain? How could you? "Bush bounced back from 9/11 the best way he could"! Bury the destruction of democratic institutions and move on, he says.
Someday, I do think we will see a bunch of ex-presidents in a war crimes docket. I hope both Bush and Clinton are there, and I'm sure Obomba will be.
yeah, lets just pretend nothing happened... this post p*&$#ess me off so much with it's superficiality that i can't write anymore...
This is typical of former Bush voters, even when they see a thin beam of light years after it's too late to matter. It wasn't "bad decisions" Bush made that defrauded the country into invading Iraq. They were very deliberate, calculated lies meant to divide the country and create an opening for Bush as dictator, and they worked because millions like jlohman drank the kool-aid. Prosecuting this war criminal for heinous crimes against humanity has nothing to do with being vindictive. Failing to prosecute will only lead to the further detriment of the country, if you're really interested in the country's welfare. Ignoring 8 years of lies, deceit, chicanery and illegality cannot help but dig us deeper into the moral cesspool the Bush-Cheney years waterboarded the entire world into. But it's apparent you lack the basic moral equipment to detect this, having voted TWICE for this consummate idiot.
In addition to 500,000 dead Iraqis and 3 or 4 thousand dead Americans, and an ancient country in ruins with the intention to wipe out their history and culture...signing thousands of deregulations turning a blind eye to corporations and Wall Street leaving the country in financial ruin, not to mention torture, rendition, etc. etc.
...oh yes, let's just move on...let bygones be bygones...geeez.... what are you doing on CD after voting for Bush not only once, but twice...you are part of the problem and one of those neanderthals the rest of the world shakes their head in disbelief of so much ignorance ...
jlohman August 21st, 2009 5:41 pm..............Bush is a genocidal murderer. This is not vindictiveness. This is JUSTICE. The entire Bush criminal family is a pox on this earth. The CIA needs to be crushed. The FBI has some hopes. Tell your "moving on story" to the victims of the Bush regime....especially the tortured children and future victims of the use of DU in the ME.
9/11 was a false flag, so there was little to bounce back from.
Support NYC CAN for a re-investigation of 9/11.
I know I am wasting my time here, since you voted for Bush twice. Are you sure you are on the right website?
Yeah, like I know this guy, he murdered someone a few months ago. But hey, that's in the past and we must look forward. We can't be bothered by the 'rule of law' and other responsibilities.
Obama is a hypocrite just like previous Presidents.
Give credit to Nadler for spelling out the "reality" that political considerations and anticipated public reactions TRUMP the national interest, the rule of law and justice. Nadler was in a position during the last Congress when "torture" was in the public domain along with numerous other violations of the Constitution by the Bush administration to move for an impeachment investigation. He did not -- and in my one conversation with the Congressman [January 2008 in NH], he seemed not to be knowledgeable about impeachment. Nadler apparently wants Obama to move -- I believe he is still in a postion as a member of the House Committee on Justice to do more than he is doing.
Peace,
Herb Hoffman
Heck, no one should obey the law, no one should pay their bills, every one should cheat and get as much as they can get no matter who you screw especially if it is the government ( taxpayer citizens) since that is the example our officials set. Excellent anarchy and chaos-just what the system needs to recover, make a 5 year plan and be able to anticipate the rules of the road ahead. Labour is in the same boat-they should know what to expect from experience by now-the shaft and few job opportunities. I feel more secure already.
Cheers,
RR
Accessory after the fact
http://www.gpln.com/accessory.htm
Obama is not stupid. He has crafted everything from running his campaign to his presidency today. He chose Holder to head up the justice dept because Holder worked at a Washington DC law firm that represented GWBush in the Rove missing email case. He defended the RNC against many suits like the phone jammbing case in New Hampshire.
Upon entering his presidency Obama chose Holder because he knew that it was very unlikely unless pushed he would go after the last administration. Obama said "look to the future" and I am passing this to dead end Holder.
However the spirit of justice that statue with the scales is blind folded. She is blind folded so that she can not see if the prosecuted is rich or poor, black or white, holds power or has none. Without the equality of justice and we are so very close to that even without this issue then the rule of law fails.
Obama not seeking prosecution of crime as is his sworn duty is braking the law and braking the back of the spirit of justice casting out the rule of law and replacing it with president as King. He may wish he was on the field with Martin Luther King but as we know by now he is not even in the same league.Will we allow him to be the other kind of King?
500,000 unnecessary deaths in Iraq some very backward, picky, over sensitve radicals might just possibly find a crime in that USA made hell.
Afghanistan is going the way of Iraq or worse,( less resources to rebound with and much longer warfare) might be a crime in those untold number of dead civilians and dead nationalist freedom fighters.
correct. as i do believe many others have noted many times during the last 8 years, the Nuremberg judges did declare that unprovoked invasion of other countries is the ultimate war crime.
this is certainly the case in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
JUSTICE!.....It's that simple....JUSTICE......InternationaL and domestic laws have been broken. If you cannot live up to your OATH OF OFFICE, step down and let someone with COURAGE take the helm, Mr. Obama. This is not a choice because of political overtones.....IT IS MANDATORY THE LAW BE ENFORCED.
Talk is cheap, Mr. Nadler. Where's the action?
And when, exactly, has Obama, since winning the election, shown any regard for the law?
Mr. Stein is in all seriousness entertaining the notion that Obama has political fortitude. Must be something wrong with that man Stein.
"From a point of view of reestablishing justice in this country, it is essential."
Yes, and from a moral point of view, it is also essential.
But justice and morality no longer seem to matter to the power elite who run this country.
You said it, Ed! If they don't indict and charge them with war crimes (not to mention crimes against the constitution, and for lying to the American people and the world) they owe every tyrant and war criminal ever prosecuted pardons, and/or apologies. The Lies and acts of Bush, Cheney, Rove and Ashcroft; to name a few, are as evil and wrong as any dictator or tyrant in modern times
perhaps a career change is in the making for. it goes like
this- push cart vendor in the dc area working between doj and
the whitehouse. product in demand? BALLS! GOT EM BY THE SET
DOZEN OR GROSS.free instillation included! lifetime guarantee!
need some focus group feed back here. what do you all think?
genicon
The real crime was not sterilizing the Bush and Walkers beginning with Prescott's generation, what a better world it would have been.
Now all we can do is wonder what vermin with those names waits for its time to come.
-- But Nadler is no dupe. --
Now why is this sentence here? Why is there the supposed need for the author to write this and then have to explain why Mr. Nadler is no 'dupe'? This is either sloppy writing or something more invidious.
"But Nadler is a realist" would say the same thing and not have any negative connotations, only positive.
Thank GOD...
It will be to wait and see how far it goes.
If it isn't done, we won't have a moral leg to stand on on anything. We 50 somethings grew up with one total constant...nazis torture, barbaric inhumane governments torture, WE don't torture. It's a line you don't cross.
And 7 years ago, it was the 50 somethings (and slightly older) in the Bush administration that gleefully crossed that line. Some people of your generation didn't get that memo.
Amen, and damned straight, OnceAgain!
THE OBAMA DEFENSE
I don't much like my next door neighbor, and I suspect he may be a terrorist. So tonight I'm going to torture and kill him.
I don't have to worry about facing prosecution. When they catch me I'll tell them it all happened in the past, and that we should only look to the future.
That's right, I'll call it "The Obama Defense."
In California we can't afford prisons anyway. Shouldn't the "forward looking" Obama Defense be reason enough to shut them down completely?
the alternative would be violating the law. this is news?
Nope. A "senior democrat" recognizing it publicly - now that's news!
This kind of public recognition and acknowledgement creates a motivation to prosecute - both the bushAdmin torturers and perhaps eventually 0.
Here we are arguing about what is considered torture when we should be investigating goals outlined in the "original" Project for the New American Century" as applied by the Bush Administration.
The BIG LIE, to the people, to deceive them into a war without end!
That's the BIG crime! First things First!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Video on PNAC:
http://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=oSPqto796Lc
NMBill August 21st, 2009 2:16 pm..............Re-investigate 911.....there will be no peace and moving ahead without a new and independent investigation. This is a must. Please support NYC CAN.
If you mean including an investigation about what and when top people in the Bush administration knew about an Al Quieda plot, and the possibility that they let it happen that is fine. but if you are hoping for some kind of conclusion that the events on Sept. 11 were all a huge lurid Bush administration plot of remote controlled planes and secretly planted explosives - well, you have good company among the gun slinging "death panel" people.
The facts are a group of radical Arabs hijacked the planes and flew them into the symbols of US imperial power, and for some pretty obvious reasons. It was indeed a horrible tragedy, but it was a fully expected consequence of US foreign policy. It is that foreign policy that needs investigation.
1. Remote controlled planes exist. Were they involved in the WTC attacks? How should I know for sure. But maybe...it would explain the flying ace piloting that was involved in the attacks.
2. Hidden explosives. The evidence is strong and mounting that the WTC collapses were controlled demolitions. The clearest indication is WTC 7 which was not hit by any plane or damaged by large debris, but collapsed anyway into its own footprint as in a controlled demolition. Also a peer reveiwed Danish science journal published a study that found significant nano-thermite (a powerful military restricted explosive) residue in WTC debris.
Opportunity-The Bush family had tentacles that reached deeply into information about WTC security. With Cheney's, the plotters were able to be sure that there would be no air defense intercepts until it was all over.
Motive
Motive 1 - Excuse to invade Iraq. It's an historical fact that that Cheney & the Company pushed the false 9/11 - Saddam connection
Mtive 2 - Destroy Pentagon accounting records that would have shed light on the missing 3 trillion at the Pentagon= google Dov Zakheim.
Motive + Opportunity = Suspect
Arrest and Prosecute all War Criminals Now!!!
Im for a real investigation but all of your truth books are off on
" Hidden explosives. The evidence is strong and mounting that the WTC collapses were controlled demolitions. The clearest indication is WTC 7 which was not hit by any plane or damaged by large debris, but collapsed anyway into its own footprint as in a controlled demolition."
Here is why:
number 7 was heavily damaged from the tower debris falling on it and in fact it did not fall in its foot print as the damaged back side peeled away and fell back away from the front side as in the fall in movie clip you see.
All your cult books like leave out these facts.
Ask why your sources leave out the contradictory facts to what you are claiming.
Steel frames do not have to "melt" and the way you guys keep this melt crap up the more you show ...no Show.
Engineers know that structural steel begins to fail and warp under normal loads at only 1,000 degrees. F
After the explosions of the airplanes there were no normal loads on the damaged frames trying to hold the upper ends of the towers... they were big time heavy loads on hot reduced, damaged and weakened frames getting hotter by the second.
Any one who calls these fires "little fires" is out of touch with reality.
All these false claims have been proven false and the amount of "unburned thermite" claimed to have been found in the dust seems to be more than anything else stored in the building.... thermite does not go out.
why didn't it burn?
Because there was no thermite...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_
1WP8do&feature=player_embedded
If Obama does not investigate these guys, He will not get reelected, and I might get so pissed, I'll write another protest song!
See ya
Jim Glover August 22nd, 2009 3:16 pm
Im for a real investigation but all of your truth books are off on
" Hidden explosives. The evidence is strong and mounting that the WTC collapses were controlled demolitions. The clearest indication is WTC 7 which was not hit by any plane or damaged by large debris, but collapsed anyway into its own footprint as in a controlled demolition."
Here is why:
number 7 was heavily damaged from the tower debris falling on it and in fact it did not fall in its foot print as the damaged back side peeled away and fell back away from the front side as in the fall in movie clip you see.........(What movie clip?...which link?...the one below?....nothing there about WTC 7. Get it together! If you have evidence, make it easily available. If you have seen a video from the rear of WTC 7, I would sure like to see it. No one else has. And any rear view has nothing to do with the controlled demolition of this building. Even experts who did not know this was WTC 7, have said this was absolutely a controlled demolition. Witnesses heard the countdown. Silverstein said, "Pull it". The damage from the falling tower was no place near enough to bring down the building. One must remember that a steel structured building has never collapsed from fire in the history of mankind. Yet, on that dreadful day, we are supposed to believe against unbelievable odds that THREE buildings collapsed on that day due to fire that could never have exceeded 600 degrees.)
All your cult books like leave out these facts........(What facts...you have presented NONE!)
Ask why your sources leave out the contradictory facts to what you are claiming....(Same as above...you have presented NO FACTS...only the illusion of facts...c'mon, you can do better than that!)
Steel frames do not have to "melt" and the way you guys keep this melt crap up the more you show ...no Show.....................( No, they may not have to melt...AND the temperature was not even high enough to "bend" them....600 degrees..PULease! There was also NO HEAT on the bottom structure below the supposed points of impact. Those girders were constructed to easily support the entire top structure whether or not it was collapsing due to the enormous heat you propose. Heat that was so enormous, that one of the firefighters said would take ONE HOSE to extinguish.
Engineers know that structural steel begins to fail and warp under normal loads at only 1,000 degrees. F......(Even if we accept your engineers hypotheseis that the temperatures were that hot, were they hot enough to vaporize FOUR titanium engines...which would normally melt at about 5000 degrees? Would that heat also turn the 100's of thousands of tons of concrete into nano particles of dust?? Would it set vehicles on fire eight blocks away.??)
After the explosions of the airplanes there were no normal loads on the damaged frames trying to hold the upper ends of the towers... they were big time heavy loads on hot reduced, damaged and weakened frames getting hotter by the second.....................(Steel is a great conductor and wouild therefore disipate the heat thrpoughout the building....what LITTLE HEAT THERE WAS!
Any one who calls these fires "little fires" is out of touch with reality.....................(Then, I guess the fireman (chief, I believe) that was on the scene did not know of what he spoke.....it's all on tape and has been replayed a million times)
All these false claims have been proven false and the amount of "unburned thermite" claimed to have been found in the dust seems to be more than anything else stored in the building.... thermite does not go out...........(What claims?....what have you proven?
why didn't it burn?
Because there was no thermite...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_
1WP8do&feature=player_embedded
If Obama does not investigate these guys, He will not get reelected, and I might get so pissed, I'll write another protest so.................
((If you are truly interested in finding the truth for yourself, there is no need to be an engineer...the facts and research are readily available on many sites and on myriad DVDs. Even if you accept the pancake theory (which is total hogwash and has been disproved hundreds of ways and hundreds of times) you would still have a rubble piles tens of stories high. The concrete and everything else (bodies, desks, chairs, fixtures, TITANIUM ENGINES et al) would not have disintegrated in to nano particles of dust. Vehicles almost a half mile away would not have caught fire in strange patterns. Explosions witnessed in the basement BEFORE the buildings collapsed would not have occurred (recorded on seismograph readings). The truth is on it's way and cannot be stopped. And remember that in the history of mankind, steel structured buildings have never collapsed from fire...NEVER...and on that fateful day, three huge buildings came down from very short and small fires. WTC 7 was NOT hit by any plane.))
Free DVDs from the 911dvdproject.com
Other valuable sites that will lead you to many more and some excellent books:
ae911truth.org
911sharethetruth.com And please support NYC CAN
911weknow.com
stj911.org
911blogger.com
physics911.net
911research.com
infowars.com
wtc7.net
pilotsfor911truth.org
See ya!
Wow, you sound like an advertisement.
just this one site
http://www.debunking
911.com/
index.html
will show photos of many things that you think I am wrong on.
It is such a cliche this "And remember that in the history of mankind, steel structured buildings have never collapsed from fire...NEVER...and on that fateful day, three huge buildings came down from very short and small fires. WTC 7 was NOT hit by any plane.))"
Ya failed to mention none of the steel structured buildings that did not collapse were first hit by jet airliners and when the towers fell, the debris destroyed every building in the complex which is not too foot printy for me.
so tell me what this site prints about the Debunking and than you can debunk the debunkers on.
but I want proof that you got proof of anything that you can prove that proves what you are trying to convince me of.
So Maybe you can tell me what happened.
I saw all this fire and smoke commin outta huge holes an your gonna tell me they were little fires... there was more smoke visible than fire but the fire was a burnin and it was bending the beams a glowin according to the firemen in the helicopter observing the fire.
So Just the facts please... and questions don't quite equal facts.
Jim Glover August 22nd, 2009 6:08 pm..........Wow, you sound like an advertisement. .......(Cut the crap...just deal with the facts on all the sites I gave you. You are responding in generalizations. I've given you specifics. Here's another one about the Pentagon.....which says it is mathematically and physically impossible for that flight 77 to have hit the pentagon without disintegrating....please respond to this.....
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2009/0702-Flight77.html
just this one site
http://www.debunking
911.com/
index.html
will show photos of many things that you think I am wrong on.......(I refer you to David Ray Griffin's "Debunking 9/11 Debunking".
It is such a cliche this "And remember that in the history of mankind, steel structured buildings have never collapsed from fire...NEVER...and on that fateful day, three huge buildings came down from very short and small fires. WTC 7 was NOT hit by any plane.))".......(.It may have become a cliche, but that does not dismiss it as fact. Stick to the facts and please stop the diversionary remarks. )
Ya failed to mention none of the steel structured buildings that did not collapse were first hit by jet airliners and when the towers fell, the debris destroyed every building in the complex which is not too foot printy for me..........(I thought you said the fires destroyed the towers. Now, you are saying the impact destroyed the towers...which is it? The towers were built to withstand the impact of several airliners.
so tell me what this site prints about the Debunking and than you can debunk the debunkers on..........(What site?...Be specific!)
but I want proof that you got proof of anything that you can prove that proves what you are trying to convince me of..(What the hell are you saying. Again, stop the crap and stick to the facts.....
So Maybe you can tell me what happened.............(Do the research if you are interested in finding the truth instead of the lies of the official story. I did.) I've given you all the info. I am not here for you to pick MY brain. Do the work.
I saw all this fire and smoke commin outta huge holes an your gonna tell me they were little fires... there was more smoke visible than fire but the fire was a burnin and it was bending the beams a glowin according to the firemen in the helicopter observing the fire. .........(More smoke than fire...an oxygen starved situation, which means the temps could get no where near the degrees necessary to melt or compromise the steel. I did not say they were little fires...the chief did. If the fire was so hot, how could that woman standing in the opening stand the heat? Ever see that picture? Ever see the pics of the huge steel girders cut diagonally...only could be done with thermite or thermate.)
So Just the facts please... and questions don't quite equal facts...(.Nonsense...I've given you plenty of facts and there are many more on the sites. Do the research, read the sites...answer the FACTS I have presented.)
You have stated that you want a re-investigation of 9/11. You must have some doubt about the official story.
nevergiveup,
Since you suggested we "cut the crap".
You have not given me any facts and I don't think David Ray Griffin is an expert in the subject or science. He is into religion. That is his expert field of study and it shows.
.
You say:
"(I thought you said the fires destroyed the towers. Now, you are saying the impact destroyed the towers...which is it? The towers were built to withstand the impact of several airliners."
THE ENGINEER WHO SAID THE TOWERS WERE BUILT TO WITHSTAND IMPACT OF AIRLINERS ALSO FINISHED THE SENTENCE WITH, IT WASN'T DESIGNED TO TAKE A MASSIVE FIRE FROM THE IMPACT.
We can all see that the buildings stood for a while after the crash but the fires built up and could not be extinguished no matter how much you distort it.
You guys always cherry pick apart a statement and that is your crap.
You "thought", that is the problem you did not read correctly what I said. It was the fires that warped the beams including the weakened, and already damaged beams from the huge impact and explosiions. They go together no matter how you try to make it all one or the other. It is you guys who try to make it only a "little fire', you take a comment out of context and a single picture of an impact or exit explosion hole where some poor person was somehow able to get to, does not indicate the temperature of the beams and raging fire inside the towers. If i remember that photo the wind was blowing the smoke and fire away from that person by the hole. Tell the firemen who were there that it was a "little fire".
Most fires in big buildings well give off more smoke than fire but that does not mean the fire was not hot. More crap from YOU.
I gave you the site to debunk.
http://www.debunking911.com/
It takes all your crazy theories and puts them up to the light of reason and science, not religion which is the real expertise of David Ray Griffin, not science or fires.
Yes, I have a doubt about the official story. I doubt that the Bush was not aware that a suicide plane attack was in the works because many intel agencies knew and Bush called off the FBI from investigating the Saudi connections to the hijackers just before 9/11. Bush was planning on attacking Afghanistan for oil pipelines at the time.
The truth movement largely doesn't even believe there were hijackers so that gets Bush off the hook and puts him in your fantasy.
This article is about investigating Bush.
If by some miracle there is an investigation, if I was defending Bush you guys with your crazy theories would be the first witnesses i would call and the case would be dismissed from lack of any real evidence.
Bush would be off the hook. The best way to ruin a case is to bring sensational charges which have no proof.
I am familiar with all your charges and the demolition ones are false.
So are you prepared to testify under oath about what you are charging here?
Every cover-up needs these distractions to succeed and you are doin a swell job.
Give up Jim, the loonies will go their graves believing in their nutty theory.
I am a civil engineer, and the most obvious evidence debunking their nonsense is simply that, when reviewing movies of the collapses, which clearly initiated at the floors where the impact and fire occurred, look absolutely, positively, NOTHING like any kind of building demolition using explosives, and everything like a progressive collapse. It is like someone pointing at a Cessna 150 and insisting that it is a Airbus A380. Well, yes, they are both airplanes, but otherwise are completely dissimilar. Same with the manner that these building collapsed, versus a explosive demolition.
And then ther is the Building 7 nonsense. Even if, for arguing, the collapse of Building 7 was enigmatic, (it wasn't) it is completely irrelevant to the other irrefutable facts. It is like dismissing an otherwise rick-solid case against a bank robber, because one of his accessory's has an alibi.
pjd412
So now you're a civil engineer are you? How many professions could one screen name posses?
Answer this civil engineer:
What was the original specification of the world trade center? What was it designed to be able to absorb? ANSWER: an impact of a B707 just as nuclear containment building were from the 50's. Next question Mr engineer: Are the B707 weights the same weight class as a B757? Are they same fuel loads? I'll let you answer this one, because I suspect you don't know and are going to get the answer wrong.
What are the odds of two buildings, both designed to absorb and burn the fuel out of that class of airliner, failing to meet their design specification?
What are the odds that both of them, would fail symmetrically even though the impact on the south tower hit on the corner where the remaining fuselage exited the building (clear from one video I watched.)
What are the odds, that an insurance company would pick up the phone to FEMA and voice concern that adjacent buildings might go down if the failure occurred on one side first and the thing tipped over like a giant falling redwood tree taking out ten city blocks?
Would you scramble a team to blow the building to save the lives in the adjacent buildings?
I would.
TJ
p.s. Not only would I have done that, but after the near collapse in 1993, I would have planned for this eventuality and pre wired all tall buildings in accordance with prudent FEMA contingencies.
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
The odds are good when the building was not designed for airline hits plus catastrophic explosions and fire, and the design specifications were on paper but the cost cutting corners were in the rubble.
the Empire state building was made to take a hit and fire but the towers were not.
Even if you would have wired all tall buildings does not prove anything except your weirdness and you are no Thomas Jefferson.
pjd412 August 22nd, 2009 11:07 pm...........Why not try to debate without your childish personal attacks.
If someone does not believe in what you believe, that does not make them loonie. It simply makes them someone with a different opinion.
Beliefs that have no roots in physical reality are not opinions. Saying the earth's sky is yellow is not an opinion.
Go here:
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
Explain Bldg. 7, pjd412, and don't give me the insane story that it was those tiny fires.
I think there is plenty of room for you over at the nearest "death panel" meeting.
Go here:
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
pjd412 August 22nd, 2009 12:44 am.................Read David Ray Griffin's book, "Debunking 9/11 Debunking".....
No, go here:
www.-
journalfor9/11studies.com, stj9/11.com, ae9/11truth.com, pilotsfor9/11truth.com, etc.
Go to books like, "Crossing the Rubicon," which was presented as case evidence by a former police detective, using forensics and investigation as if 9/11 were a crime, which it was.
If the truth were there, why wasn't OBL tried in absentia? Why hasn't he even been charged with this crime, even to the present day? Why haven't the confiscated DC hotel camera video tapes been released? Why was no explanation given to the fact that photographed in the Pentagon wreckage was a turbo-fanblade from an air-breathing cruise missile? Why hasn't a coherent explanation of the Unbelievable Total Lack of the survivability of the hidden massive-beam Inner-core backbone of not just one but BOTH towers addressed - if Those Giants crumpled so easily, then why isn't every steel-frame building shut down and razed as unsafe?
Why then, if the steel actually were 'melted' by the spectacular but brief and relatively harmless Hollywood-style air-blowoffs of most of the jet fuel, and then the resultant office furnishings-and-paper fires, did the towers not fall asymmetrically, as the fires were totally asymmetric as was the physical damage? Why have there been NO successful and enlightening trials of terrorists YET in this country (whatever happened to the 'terrorists' in Florida who asked their FBI handler/instigator if they could have some shoes first please?) And so on.
IF Americans were involved, most probably Bush and Cheney were not, directly; no reason for them to be, though it is tempting to read something into Bush's nonchalance the day of the attacks, sitting there as if he had been told that the plan had been executed, rather than the reported phrase that the nation was under attack... and then sitting there for seven more minutes and reading a kiddie book before someone finally decided to hustle him away as being a little TOO nonchalant... because he 'didn't want to scare the kids'... ya gotta be kidding.
No, IF Americans were involved (and it is not an established fact, just like all the other inconvenient facts, which is the problem), this would have to be done by something like a rogue CIA superblack cell. Nothing reported out of the box. Nothing evidenced as going into the box. Independent operation, no directives. All of it roped off from the politicians that had handed down the generalized clandestine initiatives (America doesn't torture... but maybe somebody does, wink, wink. And the President does not condone torture... but maybe someone will, wink, wink. And we have to work on the Dark Side... but how Dark well who knows WINK WINK. And according to PNAC if there were a new Pearl Harbor... but of some homemade kind WINK WINK. And if the Chicago Boys Gangleader Friedman thinks it would be great to perpetrate Shock Doctrine Treatment on Americans... maybe someting might will happen to dem WINK, WINK.)
And as far as keeping all this secret, well, the Manhattan Project was totally unknown to the American public at the time and the details unknown for decades, even after atomic bombs leveled whole cities, though thousands worked on the project. A 9/11 project wouldn't even need as much as a few dozen insiders, all of them silenced by their own high treason. Hey, just look at Bernie Madoff...can people keep a secret for years or what?
But the investigation of the most important single event on American soil of the past decade has been a shameful whitewash and bumsrush. I am not a 'truther'-cultist, I am a truth-searcher, as most questioners are. And the 9/11 investigation has been most obviously politically thwarted from the start, and still is. Let us investigate this major crime as a major crime, investigated by detectives not politicians, in public and in full, to wherever it may lead, as it is clear nobody now knows the full truth. Because the real opposite of the 'truthers' are the 'obstructionists'.
Excellent post Mr. Horn,
I was a pilot for many years and must tell you that there are a few disturbing accidents in the pilot community that do not add up at all.
They are:
• Colorado Springs. No evidence was ever recovered and no plausible causes ever determined. The yaw damper was eventually blamed via pressure to conclude the long running investigation, but none of us ever saw any transcripts of CVR or FDR printouts. Just a picture of a smoking crater like at the pentagon. We accepted it as: a high speed impact. But nobody reported a sonic boom in the area, which means it wasn't going fast enough to cause a supersonic crater like that. That close to the ground, with an object as big as a B737, somebody's windows should have been blown out.
• TWA 800. All B747 TWA pilots I have talked to, have told me that they feel the plane was hit by a missile. Much of the evidence was destroyed. It was well documented by the Mcgraw Hill publication Aviation Week and Space Technology, that the FBI interfered with the investigation (Director Louis Free) , and for the first time in history would not allow the NTSB investigators to see or photograph any of the wreckage until after the Navy yanked it up on deck. This destroyed any hope of figuring out which pieces came off first. Many were never recovered. Fuel pump wiring in the Center Fuel tank was blamed, even though for 40 years nothing like this has ever happened to a B747 before or since. Eyewitnesses on the shore claimed they saw a smoke contrail head for the plane and hit it.
• 911. Again, no transcripts were ever made available to the pilot community. Why? With these exceptions, since the advent of CVR and FDR devices transcripts were always released if the "black boxes", which are actually orange, are recovered. But even if all those were lost, (All four flights; what are the odds?) at least ATC radar data, showing direction and speed is released. Not this time. But controllers working that day claim that a NORAD exercise was underway that simulated false targets making it impossible for ATC to know what the hell was going on. No one, has ever been able to tell me what speed and bank angle the second aircraft hit at. The video is clear, that even an experienced pilot would have had trouble hitting the building from greater than a 45 degree bank angle. If the speed was over 250 knots it would have been even harder.
We have to know those two things to access whether it was likely that it was under human control. My guess is the guy was just lucky, (from his perspective) since he almost just clipped the corner and missed the building. Massive vacancies were in the building (from the 2000 recession) and the ownership had just changed. After the 1993 near collapse, insurance companies were concerned about the payout on a teetering building that would fall like a redwood and take out ten city blocks. A guy used to post here at CD that claimed there was an "operation Godzilla" mandated by FEMA to prewire tall buildings in case they got hit and threatened large adjacent buildings if they were not expected to collapse straight down. It's logical.
We need a real investigation, starting with Salem Bin Laden, GWB's financial business partner in Abusto Energy, and then with the hundreds of transactions between H.W.Bush's Caryle Group and the Bin Laden Brothers Construction for Industry.
Otherwise, this government doesn't want us to know what happened, and we're just pissing in the wind. All of the above, is just my opinion only.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
ThomasJefferson, Typical. Great Post!
'cept one thing, all you wrote ain't jus'
yer opinion sir; cuz I concurr.
Thanks Joe, feedback means a lot to me,
And I sincerely regret attacking you earlier in the year on environmental threads. I tend to automatically suspect that anyone who disagrees with me is a NeoCon troll! I need to work on that.
I hope you will forgive me.
TJ
double post
Totally agreed.
Plus, I think they coined (and vigorously pursued) the term "never waste a crisis" way before Rahm Emanuel ever did.