EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
World Economic Forum: Davos Under Fire
Public Eye Awards 2009
DAVOS, Switzerland - One of the few indicators on the rise at this time of economic and financial crisis is the level of repudiation expressed about those responsible for the disaster, and about the institutions sponsoring them.
This became apparent at this eastern Swiss tourist resort, the venue for the annual sessions of the World Economic Forum (WEF), one of the arenas which has supported the deregulation policies blamed for causing the crisis.
Socialist Swiss lawmaker Susanne Leutenegger was outspoken in linking the WEF with the crisis. The Davos Forum has been one of the ideological agencies behind these policies, as finance, industry and politics mingled at the Forum sessions, which started 39 years ago, she said.
This was the place where contacts and informal networks were established, while politicians sat "below the salt" and the media were fascinated by the rich and powerful global élite, she continued, saying the Forum was "a fly-by-night lobby operation for the bankrupt neoliberal (free market) business model".
Leutenegger was speaking at the awards ceremony of the Public Eye on Davos, organized by Swiss non-governmental organizations The Bern Declaration and Greenpeace Switzerland, where "dubious distinctions" are conferred on companies that have shamefully violated ethical and environmental principles.
As a result of these awards and the political content of the prize-giving ceremonies, the Public Eye has been, since 2000, one of the most critical observers of the Davos Forum.
Back then, the media were in such a frenzy about Davos that they stifled voices of critical dissent calling for a more socially responsible economy with sustainable policies, Leutenegger said.
The global Public Eye award went this year to U.S. mining company Newmont, the world's largest gold producer, for its "scandalous" practices in Ghana, where it has destroyed unique natural habitats, carried out forced resettlement of local people and polluted soil and rivers, according to the jury.
The "prize" for Swiss companies was awarded to BKW FMB Energy, for building a coal-fired thermoelectric plant in Germany. Coal is the most polluting of all fuels, the organizers said.
In contrast, the Public Eye awarded a Positive Prize, in recognition of the efforts of Colombian trade union leaders Jairo Quiroz and Freddy Lozano and their union Sintracarbón to reverse the decision of a transnational coal mining company that had displaced 800 Afro-descendant families to expand their operations in El Cerrejón, in northeastern Colombia.
In fact, the negative awards target two companies that epitomize the social and environmental abuses committed by all the members of the WEF and by large corporations that are the true image of profit motivated globalization, the organizers of the Public Eye said.
The Bern Declaration and Greenpeace sent a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama on Thursday, asking him to introduce corporate regulation now.
So far, efforts to impose mandatory international corporate accountability rules on transnational corporations have failed because of opposition from the United States, they said.
The message to Obama requests that in future, all transnational company projects respect the rights of local communities in their area of operations. It also asks for an end to impunity for companies that violate the rules.
The two organizations want the Public Eye to become a rallying point for all critics of the Davos Forum, said Oliver Classen of The Bern Declaration.
The Swiss authorities also came in for criticism for their financial support for the WEF. The Forum is a private meeting, but the Swiss government subsidies it to the tune of eight million Swiss francs (seven million dollars), mostly for security services, Leutenegger said.
She estimated that total spending by the Swiss state on the Davos Forum amounted to some 20 million Swiss francs (17.6 million dollars).
Police from several Swiss cantons and some 5,000 army soldiers are deployed during the week of WEF sessions, while the national air force, in conjunction with that of Austria, secure the air space over Davos.
Leutenegger said that street protests against the Davos Forum are for the most part prohibited. The rights to free speech and free association are practically suspended throughout the country during the WEF, she emphasized.
A demonstration against the Davos Forum, convened by leftwing political and social organizations for Saturday in Geneva, has been banned by the authorities.
Leutenegger remarked that the neoliberal revolution appears to have failed dismally worldwide, and now its "shameless promoters" want to get free money from the state.
However, the Davos Forum, a successful instigator of that economic model, is doing very well, the lawmaker said. According to her estimates, the world's top 1,000 companies, members of the WEF, contribute some 40 million Swiss francs (over 35 million dollars) annually to the Forum.
In total, including the special contributions from financial companies and the fees paid by Forum participants, the WEF, which operates in Switzerland as a charitable foundation, has an annual income of about 100 million Swiss francs (88 million dollars).
Leutenegger also rebuked the left and trade unions for failing to apply the necessary pressure to contain the forces that precipitated the crisis.
Fundamental discussion is needed, especially among the left, trade unions and social movements, about building a post-capitalist system and putting it into practice, she concluded.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

26 Comments so far
Show AllGood reporting,
A "charitable foundation", banning demonstrations and stifling dissent that sets world war economic policy in the historical home of secret banking and in the country http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements where the private Central bank of all national Central Banks, the Bank of International Settlements in Basil, keeps its secret decisions on the relative value of all money. Just a few years ago these facts would seem to be another "conspiracy theory".
Way back even before the secret Jekyll Island meeting attended by all the top international banks and Warburg the representative of the Rothschild banks created the Federal Reserve (which is not Federal or a Reserve) Congress did an investigation of "Charitable foundations" like Carnegie and found that they were setting up there own college professors to teach the British system of finance as the savior of the world using War and conflict for a power independent of government for a collectivization of the power of all big private banks that joined the Big Boys.
You can Google it
So much to do, so little time. I get exhausted just contemplating a part of it...
I find this a very revealing comment....thanks davidpeace.
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
Fat chance Mr. Obama will do anything but PR on this.
Did anyone else notice how quickly criticismm of US as instigator of current finacial debacle quickly dissipated?
But I could be wrong !
The Fat Cats can't wait to get the old system rolling along again so that they can make ultra-profits by ripping off the proles. Like the Israelis, those responsible are never going to admit guilt!
The proles need to rise up and get rid of these greedy carpetbaggers and conmen, cleanse the world of them. Who needs such parasites?
www.dangerouscreation.com
I have been wondering where is the money Increase in Debt thrown at the Banks so far?
This helps a little but it sure is scary http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_Dealers_Credit_Facility
According to the article:
"The Bern Declaration and Greenpeace sent a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama on Thursday, asking him to introduce corporate regulation now."
So, I guess this another "wait and be hopeful" kind of moment.
Someone wake me up when Obama replies.
-TIA
I think the corporate bailout is his reply.
Economics, the global crisis, is one important topic at this WEF meeting, though the elites probably don't have much real caring about the rest of us anyway, really. But there was also an other and interesting topic, and the speakers are or were UNSG Ban Ki-moon, Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan, "Amre Moussa, Secretary-General, League of Arab States", and "Shimon Peres, President of Israel", while chairing this was or is David Ignatius of Wa. Post, who evidently sided with Nazi-Israeli schmuck Peres (and ilk), who speaks persuasively enough; too much, for anyone who's not sufficiently informed about the real truth of the Israeli govt's actual warring on really all Palestinians who believe in democracy, democratic rights, freedom, and so on. The Hitler-Nazi-Isaeli regime, the centuries old U.S. regime, and so on, have fooled many ignorant, or rather ignorant [and] naive, people with LIES, and the Nazi-Zionist-Israeli regime succeeds at this too.
Naive people are a [bloody] nuisance!
Anyway, Ban Ki-moon started off in what appear to be okay terms, but then says that Hamas must stop provoking Israel, so (I guess he means) Israel's therefore retaliations or else diabolically insane or sociopathic heinousness. Problem: It's not Hamas that is really provoking Israel; it's Palestinian freedom, democracy, even existence, that is provoking Israeli leadership. Well, just because Satan would prefer to see all innocent people dead, this does not mean that these people should choose to commit suicide, kill themselves, only to please Satan; I figure ... no way!
PM Erdogan certainly speaks very well in this. His introduction, by chair Ignatius, is at the end of the first clip (following Ki-moon's ... bla bla, but worth listening to in order to be witness to his words of bla bla ...), the full of the 2nd clip, and a little over half of the 3rd one; and then Amre Moussa speaks.
Peres speaks in clip 5, possibly part of 4 too, and also some of either 6 and 7, apparently having received more coverage or time due to evidently pro-Israel Ignatius ... of Wa. Post, the aka favourite "news" paper of the CIA, which works not for The People, but the one-eyed casino capitalism (having learned about "casino capitalism" from Ralph Nader's article here at CD on Jan 30th, i.e., yesterday) elites who basically run the U.S. govt and want to dominate economics globally, "full spectrum dominance" style.
Iow, I haven't listened to all of these seven clips, so far, but have heard some of all of them, and all of 1, 2 and 5, plus all of what PM Erdogan says in part or clip 3. The rest of what I said just above is based on clips from other people posting at Youtube.
Video, "Davos Annual Meeting 2009 Gaza The Case for Middle East Peace 1", that is, Part 1 of 7 of the topic of "Gaza: The Case for Middle East Peace", and posted by cpsiliotis, Jan 31st
Parts 1 through 7, in this order:
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=XTIVXPozwfQ (9:40)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=4b3n3DdgWnM (10:00)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=ipuWwgleAV8 (10:16)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=GyGTDQnp81I (9:48)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=xeqc7X4lim0 (10:04)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=D2OWct2Pbbo (10:07)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=X5MQvvQMCrs (8:45)
As for the economics parts of the WEF, the explicitly economics part anyway, well, I don't really care about this part for I don't trust the people who are pretending to be our elites, while actually being predators, liars, and so on. And while they won't likely do anything to seriously address the criminality of Israel against Palestinians and others, I do care about this and also believe that until we have a world in which such extreme crimes, therefore also the many extreme crimes of the U.S. and all of its brown-nosing coalition(s) allies, are addressed as they should be, then bitching about economic problems for the rest of us is all empty, hot, and wasted air or gas!
If we can't garner the energy and will to stop and prosecute the [supreme] international crimes, then there's little, if any, point in bitching, griping about global or regional economic problems; while some of those might get possibly resolved, a little, for some ... time, the world here is really burning up as if actually being in the furnaces of [hell].
Is their any possibility you would consider the idea that the worst crime being committed today is commonly committed by us all?
If you are willing to consider this, answer this; if we who care commit this crime without knowing, and it is the root cause of all crimes, what can we do?
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
"Leutenegger remarked that the neoliberal revolution appears to have failed dismally worldwide"
Now THAT is a RELEVANT truth. That the neoliberal revolution was doomed to fail before it started is another one. What can the people do about? Stop running the rat race.
"Leutenegger also rebuked the left and trade unions for failing to apply the necessary pressure to contain the forces that precipitated the crisis."
The "left" and the unions referred to here are not really left. They are pseudo-left. They sit passively in the extreme right gutter with their gutter mates who actively perpetuate the crises, handing power back and forth in a satire of democracy.
"Fundamental discussion is needed, especially among the left, trade unions and social movements, about building a post-capitalist system and putting it into practice, she concluded."
Many thanks to IPS and CD for publishing this article. Notice how the Swiss socialist distinguishes between the "left" and social movements. This is because the "left" isn't really left. It's pseudo-left, and a real obstacle to socialist movements. In power today in Washington is the pseudo-left, yet another opiate of the masses, but a "special" one.
Our post-capitalist system is built on the foundation of localism, individual and local self-sufficiency and self-determination, mass enlightenment and responsibility, in the markets and in civics. Land and water rights for all, then responsibility for local food/fuel/materials production. Notice how this fixes environmental, health, economic and political problems. This is because small scale independent producers are open to the truth about enironmental, health, economic and political impacts of production and are willing/able to adjust to maximize individual/local benefits, implying benefits for all, rather than benefits only for the elite. Localism, socialism, universalism. Everyone knows the way.
"The "left" and the unions referred to here are not really left. They are pseudo-left. They sit passively in the extreme right gutter with their gutter mates who actively perpetuate the crises, handing power back and forth in a satire of democracy."
They are not left in the sense they want to make the system right as it is. But hopefully they will become left as in I left the system to build the right one elsewhere.
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
"Our post-capitalist system is built on the foundation of localism, individual and local self-sufficiency and self-determination, mass enlightenment and responsibility, in the markets and in civics. Land and water rights for all, then responsibility for local food/fuel/materials production. Notice how this fixes environmental, health, economic and political problems. This is because small scale independent producers are open to the truth about enironmental, health, economic and political impacts of production and are willing/able to adjust to maximize individual/local benefits, implying benefits for all, rather than benefits only for the elite. Localism, socialism, universalism. Everyone knows the way."
A real jewel!
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
'Neo-liberal free market' ? Are you sure your are talking about the right ideology there? In a free market companies that fail are allowed to fail, and are not bailed out. Also, our current model, at least in the USA, is one by and for conservative rich folk. Trickle down idiots. Who are now shocked that they've looted and Ponzi-schemed their own country so badly, that they might actually have to pay taxes to keep the country running. You know, cause the 'middle class' is about gone.
Exactly!
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
We need to stop speaking in fabricated terms invented by the capitalist class. In the real world of economic systems, there is no such thing as the "middle class". There are essentially just two competing classes that exist - those that own the means of production (the capitalist class) and those that sell their labor power to the capitalist class in return for wages (the working class). This latter class includes those who are presently unemployed in what Marx called the "reserved army of the working class". Capitalists have introduced the idea of "middle class" simply as a way to divide the working class, much in the way they introduced racism, sexism, red state/blue states, etc. It makes it easier to divide and conquer if elements within the working class think they belong to some other special class, above the working class. If the so-called "middle class" does not own the tools of production, but depends on selling its labor for wages, commissions, salaries, etc., it is in fact a part of the "working class" and its economic interests are diametrically opposed to the economic interests of the capitalist class. Hmmm, that sounds like "class struggle" that the capitalist class knows only too well but makes every effort to keep that knowledge away from the working class. :-)
-----------------------------------------
Remember the butchery in Gaza by the IDF.
What a missed opportunity. A lot of the criminals in one area. They could have been arrested and tried at the world court. I wonder if the world court would be impartial?
By all reports it looks like the Davos gathering is looking to save global capitalism by adopting the social democratic model. It has been recognized that so much wealth has been appropriated from the working class by the capitalist class, that they can no longer fulfill their jobs of being consumers of the goods they produce. Consumerism can no longer be propped up by simply placing consumers in debt through the credit systems. Will the social democratic model succeed in saving capitalism? Of course not, since it still leaves the capitalist class intact to continue appropriating wealth from the working class in the way of profits based on the exploitation of labor and the private accumulation of surplus-value.
-----------------------------------------
Remember the butchery in Gaza by the IDF.
Here is a crazy Idea but The Republican party needs a direction now.
The Dems are going to be defensive and guard their power.
3rd parties are good for education but in a 2 party winner take all system they can't get power.
The real left including Ralph Nader should run as Republicans to get their ideas some influence ...a new direction.
It sounds way out, but if you want power, create a Republican Left and you can show Rush Limbaugh what the best for America can be. A Republican Green revolution.... sounds crazy and out of the box.
Coalition politics is the way to get political power. Having Nader and Mckinney split votes of the Real Left is stupid and it is not a real strategy to get anything done but complain.
Complaining is good but is only a part of running a country. Being able to get the power to fix the problems is the other part.
There are enough real Left activists to do it... Just a thought but if I wanted to run for office and have influence, I would try something new. Yes, I know I am Crazy but this is the only way I see to shake up the system and get out of the right/left rut.
Staying out of politics and doin good locally is also just as good.
In history on can see that capitalism always implodes at various times and that the rich supercapitalists whose greed has driven all into the ground end up doing just fine while the rest suffer terribly. It's part of the system. And then those on top warn against class warfare, as though they haven't been bleeding the underclass (all but a few thousand world wide) all along. The great surprise is that only in the French Revolution have those at the top had their heads lopped off. Let those holding shares in the investment banks at least lose their shirts. Bankruptcy and penury for the investment bankers, I say. Banks should be regulated like utilities from now on. I'd prefer soft socialism, but would accept seeing Paulson living in a cardboard box on Wall Street with his palms upturned for alms.
A cause of the current economic collapse is a misunderstanding. Assuming Wittgenstein's "solipsism, when its implications are followed out strictly, coincides with pure realism," [Wittgenstein, Tractatus nt. 5.64, 58.] "capitalism" being a "free market," humans “are in the condition which is called war . . . . and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” [Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, edited by John Plamenatz (Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1969) 143.] Therefore, a "free market" can be "efficient" only when its parameters are imposed. This being so, it is not "free." Thus, if defined as a free market, there is NO SUCH THING AS CAPITALISM. What is mistakenly identified as "capitalism" is more properly "mercantilism," fostering of primary economic interests as state objective. Encompassing wage suppression to lower cost, demand is reduced until engendering a crash. Objectifying this process by designating it "the business cycle" legitimizes the lower classes being a means to the upper classes' end.
oldcreditiste says that the control of the money supply gives the ability to control the economy . Until the people know that the capitalists are creating money out of thin air, [and charging interest on it], they will continue to be at the mercy of the system. Canada needs to use its Bank of Canada to create its money in stead of allowing the private banks to do this, to their profit. The United States needs to create its own Central Bank to replace the Federal Reserve, which is a private corporation, and make the money creation process a transparent public process. Of course the other countries in the world might well do the same and that would be the end of the American empire just as the end of the British empire came with the fall of the preeminence of the Pound Sterling.
Inflation is a sign/result of too much money. Depression is a sign/result of too little money.
The fact is that the bankers have no faith in their fellow bankers. That is why the credit market is 'frozen'. In addition the putative borrowers can not tell what will happen next and are reluctant to borrow and so the money supply stays down because it is not expanded by the borrowing that does not occur.
oldcreditiste would like to add a quotation. In my public school the history book had a chapter on 'The Man Who Freed the Slaves'. It did not include the following quotation, but it should have.
" Government, possessing power to create and issue currency and credit as money and enjoying the right to withdraw currency and credit from circulation by taxation, and otherwise, need not and should not borrow capital, as the means of financing Governmental work and public enterprise. The Government should create, issue and circulate all currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity." Abraham Lincoln
1. Those who would take over the earth
And shape it to their will
Never, I notice, succeed.
The earth is like a vessel so sacred
That at the mere approach of the profane
It is marred
And when they reach out their fingers it is gone.
For a time in the world some force themselves ahead
And some are left behind,
For a time in the world some make a great noise
And some are held silent,
For a time in the world some are puffed fat
And some are kept hungry,
For a time in the world some push aboard
And some are tipped out:
At no time in the world will a man who is sane
Over-reach himself,
Over-spend himself,
Over-rate himself.
LaoTzu #29 600 BC
He also said, "Pursue an offender only to show him the Way."