Rumsfeld's "Bad Apples" Didn't Fall Far From the Tree
NEW YORK - On the heels of a bipartisan Congressional report blaming high-level officials of the George W. Bush administration for employing harsh interrogation techniques on detainees captured in the "global war on terror", many of the world's most respected civil libertarians are calling for the establishment of an independent commission to investigate the alleged abuses.
One of them, Amnesty International, has also released a detailed plan to close the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Amnesty's four-part plan sets out recommendations for actions the incoming administration of President-elect Barack Obama should take during the current transition period, others immediately upon taking office, and still others to be taken during the first 100 days and in the first 18 months of the new government.
Peter Shane, a law professor at Ohio State University law school, supports the idea. He told IPS, "I think it is critical to the health of American democracy that the historical record of 2001-2009 be set forth accurately and comprehensively with regard to the use and abuse of executive power by the Bush administration."
"A congressionally authorised investigation, whether conducted within Congress or by an independent commission with subpoena power and adequate investigative resources is essential," he said.
Amnesty's recommendations came as it was revealed that Bush administration Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates -- who has been nominated by President-elect Obama to remain in office -- has also ordered the Pentagon to begin drawing up a plan to close the notorious Caribbean prison. During his presidential campaign, Obama said repeatedly that closing Guantanamo Bay would be a top priority of his administration.
The Congressional report, issued last week by the Senate Armed Services Committee, concluded that former Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking Bush administration officials were responsible for the harsh interrogations against captured terrorist suspects that took place at Guantanamo Bay and at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
Rumsfeld had attributed such abuses to "a few bad apples" -- lower-level members of the military acting on their own. But the Senate report charged that Rumsfeld bears principal responsibility for the prisoner abuses. Most civil libertarians regard these abuses as torture.
"Attempts by senior officials to pass the buck to low ranking soldiers while avoiding any responsibility for abuses are unconscionable," committee chairman Sen. Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan, said in a statement.
The committee concluded that the prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib were "not simply the result of a few soldiers acting on their own." Most of those low-ranking soldiers were found guilty by military courts and are currently serving prison sentences.
Rumsfeld's "authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques and subsequent interrogation policies and plans approved by senior military and civilian officials conveyed the message that physical pressures and degradation were appropriate treatment for detainees in U.S. military custody," the report said.
The report added that Rumsfeld's authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques for use at Guantanamo Bay "was a direct cause of detainee abuse there."
Following release of the Senate report, Amnesty International joined many other human rights advocates in recommending a thorough investigation of prisoner abuses by a 9/11-type independent commission. Sentiment for such a body appeared to be growing, partly because many in Congress fear that an investigation by Congress could become mired in partisan politics and because some members appear reluctant to risk their political careers by becoming involved in such a divisive and controversial issue.
Amnesty's recommendations provide a timeline and conditions necessary to attain truth and accountability.
"Closing Guantanamo, as President-elect Obama has pledged, is just the first step. For real change, the incoming administration and Congress must work together to fully expose the Bush administration policies as a step toward ensuring that the same abuses committed in the name of national security are not repeated," said Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA.
The Amnesty plan urged that, in the transition period and before taking the oath of office, President-elect Obama and his team should examine the options for establishing a comprehensive, independent commission to investigate U.S. detention policies and practices in the war on terror and consider either establishing a task force in the Attorney General's office or appointing an independent prosecutor to take action on pressing individual cases. These tasks should be completed during Obama's first 100 days in office, Amnesty says.
The commission's investigation should include activities conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and other agencies, as well as the secret transfer of detainees -- known as rendition -- between the United States and other countries. It should have access to classified material, subpoena power to compel the appearance of witnesses, and a mandate to make recommendations as to criminal investigations.
The Amnesty plan calls on the president to present a progress report to the nation within 18 months of taking office, and to provide a full report of the commission's findings and recommendations by 2010.
In introducing its plan, Amnesty president Larry Cox said, "President-elect Obama has a mandate from the American people for change and that begins with restoring the United States' reputation as a country guided by the rule of law and human rights."
"The fact is that senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees," the Senate report said.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice admitted for the first time in September that she led high-level discussions beginning in 2002 with other senior Bush administration officials about subjecting suspected al-Qaeda terrorists detained at military prisons to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, according to documents released by Levin.
"Those efforts damaged our ability to collect accurate intelligence that could save lives, strengthened the hand of our enemies, and compromised our moral authority," the Senate report said.
The committee's report said Pres. Bush opened the door to "considering aggressive techniques" by signing a memorandum on Feb. 7, 2002 stating that the Third Geneva Convention did not apply to the conflict with al Qaeda and concluding that Taliban detainees were not entitled to prisoner of war status or the legal protections afforded by the Third Geneva Convention, the report said.
Last April, President George W. Bush told an ABC News reporter that he had approved of meetings of a National Security Council's Principals Committee, on Feb. 7, 2002 where these officials discussed specific interrogation techniques the CIA could use against detainees. This committee's advisers included Vice President Dick Cheney, then National Security Adviser Rice, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, former CIA Director George Tenet and former Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Civil libertarians are pressing President-elect Obama to make good on his pledge to close Guantanamo Bay and investigate the prisoner abuses that occurred there, at Abu Ghraib and at other locations, including the CIA's "black sites" -- secret prisons believed to have been located in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.
One such advocacy organization, Human Rights First (HRF), prepared a plan to close Guantanamo some months ago. Many other groups, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Human Rights Watch, have long advocated the closing of Guantanamo.
Geneve Mantri, Amnesty International USA's terrorism and counterterrorism director, told IPS, "Amnesty International is urging President-elect Obama's transition team to immediately examine the options of a Congressional Select Committee, a Presidential Commission of Inquiry or legislative enactment of a Commission of Inquiry."
"The transition team should ensure that an inquiry is a priority on the agenda and build consensus toward a strong, independent, and non-partisan approach," she said. "Our organisation then calls on President-elect Obama to appoint this commission of inquiry and ensure its independent operation within his first 100 days in office."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
12 Comments so far
Show AllThis crazy cycle has been repeated far too many times. Wrong thinking at the highest levels of government is exposed, Congress starts an inquiry, the finger of blame goes into action, and then the whole thing starts anew the next time some other outrageous action occurs. And from this, nothing has been learned. The last 8 years are solid proof of the stunning small-mindedness and shoddy egotism that has afflicted US leadership for many years.
What good will it do to haul a demon like Cheney before some tribunal? The man has zero conscience. He hides behind his own words.
There are so many open sores across this nation that are festering. By all rights an investigation is due. But is there time or manpower to start investigating these criminals? As every man must, they will pay for their actions. The unfathomable laws of karma will see to that. The universe does not distinguish between men who have been presidents and men who have been paupers.
Though it is tempting, it does no good to wish them ill. Let them go away and stew naturally in the stinking rubbish of their own lives and what they have created.
National leaders must have profound knowledge of right action and a sense of morality founded upon oceanic depths. The wrong people have been elected for a very long time, chosen as if people were relying on a trusted brand name. Politics typically attracts the crude, the power-hungry, the small-minded.
But now there is hope...
This is what happens when Republican chicken hawks come into power.
www.wunderman-comics.com
Guys ! To the world it looks like USA is responsible for the torture of their combat vets. Try at a minimum using some of that law we brag about every day to impress them that the west is not totally deceitful.
Look at that picture. Rummy lying his head off and George trying to figure out what is going on.
Yes but there are some other people who do not consider them above the law, and want to see them tried and convicted.
It may not be easy, but it has to be done. Why should the world trust us to fix the economic mess if we can't bring powerful criminals to justice?
When the abuses at Abu Ghraib happened a person asked on other boards who they felt was responsible.
I indicated THEN that all evidence pointed to the very top, to both Rumsfeld and ultimately the white house. The information was all out there THAT long ago yet GW Bush won re-election.
The machinery to charge and convict these people should have started several years ago. That they are still debating whether there should be charges merely shows how corrupt the system has become and how the politicians are more interested in protecting their own backsides then doing the right and just thing.
The Rule of law means nothing to these people in power . Their mentality is that they are in fact above the law. It seems very many Americans believe that such IS and should be the case.
Letting them get away with murder will send the wrong message.
Bad apples are bad apples because of the worms inside them, like the two night- crawlers pictured above.
Well, this report isn't surprising. But it does clearly demonstrate why Gates is vastly better than Rumsfeld.
And just HOW does it demonstrate that, Joe?
Read the article: Rumsfeld is responsible for torture.
You didn't respond to my qustion, Joe.
Where does it say that Gates repudiated any of Rumsfeld's policies?
Show me.
Joe, I have a news flash for YOU: YOU are reponsible for everything YOUR government does.
Don't try to weasel out of it, either.
I haven't lived in the US for many years, and have not voted for one of the two major parties since 1972, when I voted for McGovern, but because I hold a US passport I am ALSO responsible.
And I resent the time I have to take informing folks in other countries that I am anti-US 100%--just like they are....
Joe, this is not a sandbox. Things are just a little bit more complicated.