Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- More Damning Evidence Points to Pesticide as Cause of Mass Bee Deaths
- Nobel Peace Prize Jury Under Investigation
- 'Gasland' Film Director Arrested at US Capitol Hearing
- The Cancerous Politics and Ideology of the Susan G. Komen Foundation
- A Journey To The End Of Empire: It Is Always Darkest Right Before It Goes Completely Black
Popular content
Today's Top News
Early Signs Are Obama Has to Guard His Left
SAN FRANCISCO - As he prepares to enter the ring of White House politics, President-elect Barack Obama might need to perfect that left jab just as much as his right hook.
Medea Benjamin says (jokingly) the anti-war group CodePink gave Obama "a 24-hour honeymoon." With just over two months until the new administration takes office and the transition in full force, Benjamin's words underscore the challenges facing a president whose historic campaign was bolstered by an unusual coalition that involved the activism, energy and money of unapologetic progressives like Benjamin as well as moderates and independents who are far more conservative.(Stephen Chernin / AP) Not only can the Democratic president-to-be expect the predictable
shots from the conservative right, but eventually a pounding from the
left if he doesn't deliver "change you can believe in" on issues that
concern liberal voters - health care reform, an end to the war in Iraq,
environmental protections and taking care of the economy and the
housing crisis.
"We gave him a 24-hour honeymoon - and that was generous," joked Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the anti-war group CodePink, Thursday about the chances of Obama's election silencing protests for the foreseeable future. "We believe in celebrating and then moving on."
Her grassroots organization has wasted no time doing just that. On Thursday, CodePink members hit five consulates in San Francisco - those representing Bolivia, Venezuela, Syria, Cuba and Iran - delivering flowers, apple pies and cards with a message as much for the president-elect as for the leaders of those nations: "Yes We Can ... Live in Peace."
"We told them we are embracing Obama's message, and part of that is to push him," said Benjamin. "He's getting a lot of backlash on issues like direct talks with preconditions. But that is what the American people voted for - and we will hold him to that."
With just over two months until the new administration takes office and the transition in full force, Benjamin's words underscore the challenges facing a president whose historic campaign was bolstered by an unusual coalition that involved the activism, energy and money of unapologetic progressives like Benjamin as well as moderates and independents who are far more conservative.
Mainstream tack
And many political observers say that means Obama must tack toward the political mainstream to avoid miscalculations made by President Bill Clinton, who veered left and fired up the 1994 Republican backlash and its "Contract with America" - a GOP rebirth scenario Democrats don't want to see reprised.
Obama supporter Rep. Barbara Lee of Oakland, an icon to liberals because of her long-standing activism on issues such as AIDS/HIV and her opposition to the Iraq war, said that as Democrats celebrate the new president, they are also very aware of issues to be addressed.
"We know that the president-elect - and rightfully so - is going to work to unite the country, and we will have to see how he does that," said Lee. "I'm not saying it's going to be easy. If we really want change, you have got to do it differently, you have to accept the process of change and accept that his processes will be more inclusive."
But, she adds, "we're certainly not going to lose sight of our goals and our values. ... If you look at the progressive promise - 95 percent of what we advocated for, energy independence, infrastructure, health care reform - it's mainstream," she said.
'Symbolic victory'
At the Edmund G. "Pat" Brown Institute of Public Affairs' California Policy Issues Conference this week, Melina Abdullah, a professor of Pan-African studies at Cal State University Los Angeles, said that although she and millions of other Democrats sang "It's a New Day" when Obama was elected, "we need to be very clear ... this is a symbolic victory."
African Americans, particularly, who supported Obama "need to think about ... the fact that we are overrepresented in the prison population, that infant mortality in our community looks a lot like developing nations," and that jobs and economic opportunities are still lacking, she said.
"The only way that change can be substantive is if we push him," she said of Obama. "Push him on the issues that are important to us, ... so institutional racism, institutional oppression can really be eroded in eight years," she told a crowd of young activists and students at the conference, which was held in Los Angeles.
SEIU's agenda
Andy Stern, who heads the Service Employees International Union - the nation's largest union, with 2 million members - says that labor fully expects to push ahead on critical interests, such as health care reform.
Especially since SEIU kept a singular focus on the health care issue by spending millions of dollars on advertising that aided the Democrats' cause - even as tens of thousands of its members provided critical ground troops for his election, he noted.
"Most presidential elections, we are electing a transactional president, someone who comes in and has a set of priorities and bargains with the Congress and tries to find solutions," Stern said. "Every once in a while, we have a transformational president, who actually changes the rules. And that is the moment where we're at.
"This is not about transactional discussions with health care. This is about transforming the economy, to change the way we provide health care, to change the opportunities for people to get an education," he said.
"We say we will have a 21st century economy that can compete globally," Stern said. "We need a fundamental reworking of our economic theory - and it can't just be a little stimulus ... or to provide health care for children only. It is a moment where we have to transform the way we think."
Already, there have been complaints from the left regarding Obama's choice of Rep. Rahm Emanuel as his White House chief of staff. Some liberals have complained that Emanuel was too supportive of the Iraq war, too tied to Wall Street and too connected to entrenched interests to represent change - or the views of the left - in the White House, where he worked in the Clinton administration.
Dan Schnur, a former GOP strategist who now directs the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Urban Politics at the University of Southern California, said they may have reason to be concerned.
Perils of pull to left
"Rahm Emanuel ... understands the perils of a newly elected president who intends to govern from a centrist force and how that president can be pulled leftward," he told the Brown Institute conference Wednesday.
"Emanuel is one of the five smartest people in American politics. He has that experience, he's intelligent, he's tough as nails and he's one of the few people I know in Washington who would be willing to go down to Capitol Hill" and deliver the message to the left: "If you really want to help this president ... then give him some space to enact his agenda," Schnur said.
Emanuel's lore includes an incident in which he reportedly sent a dead fish wrapped in newspaper to an adversary, said Schnur.
If Obama is to succeed, he said, "my hope ... is that there is a steady stream of such deliveries from one end of Pennsylvania Avenue to another to help President Obama accomplish his agenda."
- Posted in



159 Comments so far
Show AllMaybe we just elected the Democratic wing of the Likud Party.
Holding, pushing, tugging...
Leaving.
Its not looking good, for sure.
.We are getting exactly what we on the left forecast before the election, it never looked good in fact.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Darn....give the little feller a bit of time.
I heard that he may offer Sec. of State to Hillary and I know that would make you extremely happy. Right? Heh-Heh.
.Thomas,
This notion that one should remain silent as to ones preference for the course of this nation has led us to illegal invasion, illegal confinement, torture, murder, the theft of our treasury, the collapse of our economy ( if not that of the entire world), the crippling of many dreams for retirement, etc.
So, if you don't mind I will not lose my sense of urgency. I suggest you reevaluate your own seeming complacency as well.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Remember, nothing will change till he takes office. Bush won't change. Its not complacency, its the time between election and taking office. I don't have a clue which way he is going to jump myself, so I have to wait to see who he really is.
I think we all do.
But as to "This notion that one should remain silent as to ones preference for the course of this nation" if you construed my note as .. don't say anything...I'm going to tell you not to say anything? FUNNY!
.You are a wise man, and a real wise guy too.....hee.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
"So, if you don't mind I will not lose my sense of urgency."
I like that - nor will I.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
Thomas,
Regardless of what anyone thinks of Hillary, it seems to me apparent that the only reason he would offer her the post is to try to make sure she is in no position to challenge him in 2012.
Give the little feller some time? We don't have the time to give him, we are running out of it.
(made some notes about our other exchange on Donna Smith's article in preparation for response, but am becoming very frustrated in terms of the format as a suitable vehicle for lengthy exchanges especially when it takes time to agree on "definition of terms", e.g. with regard to rights, benefits, etc. - did not "abandon" thread mentally, 'cause it's an issue after my own heart, but do not know how to meaningfully maintain process in this "unreal" time, and space, limited format!)
Gotcha.
I only threw the Hillary thing in there because I knew that Ardee didn't favor her or Obama and I was just joshing him. He knows I would have voted for Hillary.
I agree though, it would remove her from a number of paths and she more than likely would do an excellent job in that post.
"(made some notes about our other exchange on Donna Smith's article in preparation for response, but am becoming very frustrated in terms of the format as a suitable vehicle for lengthy exchanges especially when it takes time to agree on "definition of terms", e.g. with regard to rights, benefits, etc. - did not "abandon" thread mentally, 'cause it's an issue after my own heart, but do not know how to meaningfully maintain process in this "unreal" time, and space, limited format!)"
Yeah, I agree. I've said my peace with the Common Dreams folks - all to no avail (nor even a response). Pity, this place has such potential.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
.I just cannot imagine Senator Clinton giving up her seat to become a cog in Obama's administration. If she did it would deprive us of what promises to be a whole lot of fireworks in the coming four years!
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
"If she did it would deprive us of what promises to be a whole lot of fireworks in the coming four years!"
Truer words never spoken!
Left.
a Green is born
I've always been amazed at the way our presidents have turned grey in those few short years spent in the White House. They come in looking so vibrant and youngish, and when they leave, they're old men.
After listening to, and reading all the expectations being heaped on President Elect Barack Obama from the day after the election, and knowing all the problems he must do his best to fix, I feel so much anxiety and apprehension for him as he heads into the presidency. Being of an age between my two sons, I often think how I'd feel if one of them were in his shoes. I'm very thankful they're not.
To me it seems this poor young man, still with over sixty-five days to go before entering the white house, already carries a crushing load upon his shoulders, and faces a range of mountains he'll have to climb the moment he walks through the door. I imagine how he'll look after four or eight years, and feel a great saddness for him.
I hope all who voted for him are sending him our thoughts of strength to carry that load, energy to keep going, focus to keep his eye on his goals, wisdom to know what must be done and determination to forge ahead, as well as our prayers for him and his family, and our words to let him know we stand behind him.
Nice comment.
sure being the president is tough, but not as tough as living on the street in the white cardboard box house. lets put things in perspective, obama is rich. damn rich.
and most of the problems that we're counting on obama to fix were a result of his and most of the rest of congress' support.
"and most of the problems that we're counting on obama to fix were a result of his and most of the rest of congress' support."
You mean like voting for FISA bill amendment, the Patriot Act, the bail-out of exec's who kick it in luxury hotels with the tax money of people who are losing their homes due in part to the racial discrimination of sub-prime loans - people who are losing their jobs and pensions due to Wall St. speculators, funding the illegal occupation of Iraq?
Poor Barry. Give him a chance.
"I hope all who voted for him are sending him our thoughts of strength..."
I am because I know how very much depends on his success. His task is to drink from a fire hydrant while threading a needle. He needs our help.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
"I am because I know how very much depends on his success. His task is to drink from a fire hydrant while threading a needle. He needs our help."
Nice analogy!
Ted,
He asked for the job, he campaigned and competed actively for it and spent a LOT of money to get it. He wasn't drafted for the job, nor does he take it reluctantly. Now let him do it or step aside for someone who will; I know a couple who would.
Of course he did - and that automatically sets him apart from the rest of us. However, knowing that he really isn't our messiah, nor that he walks on water for very long, we know that he has a very hard and long row to hoe. And by the way - that row is our row.
If we don't help him, we screw ourselves.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
Ted,
What does it mean to "help" him?
The list is too long to enumerate. It is up to each of us to determine how to help.
For me, helping includes constructive criticism. Criticism with the intent of strengthening Obama's focus and building a cohesive plan to will help us all. What it does not include, in my opinion, is cynical sniping and turning our backs in disgust. It's good and right to be angry and to vent it, as long as we do it in a constructive way.
Helping also means writing letters, opinion pieces, and contacting my reps. These are things that are looked down on by many here, but I hear from many quarters that this does matter - people are hungry to know how others feel about things. In the past, my opinions have swayed others to change their minds and their votes. This came about through the use of reason, not cynicism and invective.
Helping also means working with others to build community and resilience, to strengthen our support systems for the coming lean years.
In and of themselves, these things will not change the world, just my little piece of it. That is all I can hope to do.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
Nice comment.
"Helping also means writing letters, opinion pieces, and contacting my reps. These are things that are looked down on by many here, but I hear from many quarters that this does matter"
True statement. Though I wouldn't say "many", most here realize these are effective tools too. Use what works should be the order of the day, within civilized limits of course.
"Though I wouldn't say "many", most here realize these are effective tools too."
Point taken.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers"
DAVID WALKER THE PETER G. PETERSON FOUNDATION
David Walker and the Peter G. Peterson Foundation,http://www.pgpf.org/ it seems, are out to destroy Social Security and Medicare. They are the example of what Keynes meant when he said, "The real difficulty in changing any enterprise lies not in developing new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones."
It seems that the argument is not should we reform Social Security and Medicare to save the economy and the USA, but the converse that changes must be made so that this failed economic plan, of at least the last 28 years, will not destroy Social Security, Medicare and the USA. In fact, should we venture to make the economy better for the working and middle classes, Social Security and Medicare would work better for the middle and working classes. We shall have a better economy, but we ought to remember it is the economic failure of lasses-faire capitalism that threatens us with economic failure not Social Security and Medicare. “America can remake itself into a saner, more humane society.’-Nichols von Hoffman
What must we do to fix the economy?
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers"
Today, William Ayers on "Democracy Now" commented that he felt that most of the country was really center left, not center right. He also had some great comments on improving education. Wish he would get appointed to Obama's administration somewhere in Education. What a contrast to Fox News. Would like to see the expression on O'Reilly & Hannity's faces.
He's right! On issue after issue the country leans further to the left than a majority of the political class. That's why the right-wing has been on a talking points rampage about the country being center-right. They're trying to maintain that myth through propaganda.
It all began about the time -- about 25 - 30 years ago -- the Republican party made the formal decision to ditch serious working class politics (what very little they represented, or pretended to anyway) in pretty much every form and to create wedge issues -- which are cultural issues -- to garner/continue support from people they were screwing. Those are the issues people are typically a little more conservative on, thus the bogus claim the country is center-right. Toss in a couple of question about taxes and you get mixed results. It's not always that simple, of course, but it's pretty close, generally speaking. On important issues like war & peace, the economy, health care, human rights, etc. upwards of 70% fall on the left. Those are the issues people voted (many semi-described conservatives as well) for this election and the mainstream candidate that represents that is Obama.
"The Only Church That Illuminates Is A Burning Church"
-Buenaventura Durruti
It may, or may not, have begun when "the Republican party made the formal decision to ditch serious working class politics (what very little they represented, or pretended to anyway)", but it made no real headway until the so-called "opposition" party (Democrats) did the same.
We also elected the corporate wing of the Democratic Party. Party over! Along with the corporatists (Summers,Rubin), we got the AIPAC nuts (Emmanuel, Dennis Ross)and, finally, the pro-torture National Security types (John Brennan and former CIA intelligence-analysis director Jami Miscik- she of the WMD lies)running the show.
Bad news for the America as Empire crowd! The empire is broke, the oil is peaking,the spirit is lacking and the leadership is truly Roman.
So it went.
Dr Wu, the last of the big-time thinkers
DemocracyNow had a good interview this morning with Bill Ayers, interviewed with his wife, Bernadine Dorn and the interview was by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez. Three of the four have 1960s and a bit beyond,"history". I am a bit older and have less drama history than the three, but I was involved. The transcript of the interview (as well as show to view online)will be up online at the website:www.democracynow.org. I'm not sure if was Ayers or Dorn who pointed out that we are the mainstream: the majority of Americans want those reforms. Another point made someplace, not sure where, was that the media/press are blaming Clinton for going toward Left when he started in office, as an excuse to tell us that is why the Repubs.got Congress majority in 1994 and that we're not mainstream. (I may have seen it on DailyKos.)It's the mainstream media who are cautioning Obama,not us. We are the mainstream of America; the media is not.
Noam Chomsky has pointed out what he calls the "democracy gap". The gap between what the people want and what the government wants. I think we should push,push,push. There's nothing radical about the reforms most Americans want: one example:universal health care, Medicare for All is overwhelmingly supported by all Americans. It's the Congress who is scared to change.
Yes.
Revisionist history has Clinton ushered into the Whitehouse because of the economy-but the real issue of the hour was abortion. Clinton actually diffused the issue, but it was downhill from there. The Clintons rode the wave in but then they never really had the steeliness of purpose. Not so sure that Obama has it especially if he abandons everything before he even gets in the door. Stacking the deck with Clintonistas means that corporate interests are already shaping his agenda and not the true center of the majority of Americans who want out of Iraq, want single payer, are prochoice and generally find their views more in line with Kucinich when asked in a blind study, than Rahm Emanuel--but Emanuel gets the first seat at the table as gatekeeper.
Vern,
I suggest that Clinton did the same thing as Obama, campaigned on the equivalent of "change", went through a few feeble exercises for the sake of lulling his supporters into complacency, then proceeded with his real "agenda", handing us over to the Wall St. Free Market philosophy of Big Business, and succeeded to a great extent because he put a "kinder, gentler face" on this brutal agenda. Read the fine print.
Correction:Dohrn is correct spelling.
One of the things progressives have started doing is trying to influence cabinet choices. For example, there's an online petition to get Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond appointed, Secretary of Education.
You can see and sign it at http://www.petitiononline.com/DHammond/petition.html .
Please sign it and spread the word.
Thank you.
Dave Atias
Good luck with that! Many petitioned to stop the bailout - you can see where that got us.
All this talk of pushing Obama to the left is pure nonsense. His veer to the right began months ago, and will not change now that he is president-elect. The corporations and the Jewish lobby bought him off months ago. His selections for advisers and potential cabinet members are the same old faces from the Clinton era who sold the true Democratic base down the river in the 1990s.
Obama is a right-of-center politician that has what all good conmen have: a charismatic personality and promises that he doesn't intend to keep.
Obama: "Change we can believe in." Yeah, right.
This has been said before in many threads but it bears repeating:
It is not so much about pushing Obama to the left, as it is about pushing the country to the left.
The nasty right-wing Nixon signed some progressive legislation (for example the National Environmental Policy Act), NOT because he was somehow convinced by personal appeals from the Left, but because there were large somewhat organized movements demanding progressive action.
Franklin Roosevelt did not come into office with his progressive agenda worked out, but in the midst of national crisis there was a national movement (including the Communist Party and the Unions) that pushed hard for effective reforms.
We need to not worry so freaking much about the individual in the White House! We need to organize movements to push the country in the directions that it needs to go in. And with the astonishing agglomeration of national and global crises that are underway, we have powerful arguments and compelling reasons to do so!
i know i keep repeating myself in various ways, but the history of the future is actually not written yet, and we need to see ourselves as potential authors of that history. Telling ourselves that there is nothing we can do, or that our future depends on the personality or commitments of key individuals, is simply defeatism.
Well said.
I would suggest that to the extent Roosevelt, et.al, responded in the way he did was not because the left "petitioned" him, it was because it CREDIBLY threatened the Dem party with loss of power, something which the contemporary "left" has refused to do for some time. "Pretty Please", ala the Nation's pitiful open letter, or the call for petitions, marches, (and now those magically powerful e-mails) are paper (or virtual) tigers - easily blown away. Hate to say it, but Bush was right when he called us "focus groups", and Cheney openly voiced the predictable response, "So?" Do you seriously think the corporate powers that be, whose fingerprints, and checkbooks, are all over this "new" administration, will allow it to respond to "pretty please"? Give me a break! It is still true that power concedes nothing without a demand - petitions and e-mails are not demands. Demands involve stated and enforced consequences for failure to deliver. We had this chance in '96, '00, '04, and '08 - and blew it every time. The Dems have no reason to believe there will be any "consequences" for them if they merrily continue their corporate agenda, especially if they smile, use nice words and reassure us that they "feel our pain" as they do it. Obama will not be the Roosevelt of our time, because we are not the Left of the '30's.
PS - am currently watching Book TV on C-Span2, Miami Book Fair presentation by Klein and Scahill. Good stuff, check it out.
Another serious consideration is the organization of the police. Democracynow.org did reports from the DNC and RNC (where they were assaulted and arrested) on the multi-million dollar command centers. There were pre-emptive raids on police watchdog group iwitness video http://iwitnessvideo.info/ - an Iraq veteran that was peacefully protesting outside the last presidential debate was trampled by a policeman's horse. Dissenting protesters are put into cages, or controlled zones.
Have the labor unions really organized the ranks to demand majority supported issues like single-payer when they have supported a candidate that will subsidize health insurance companies with our tax dollars? The Employee Free Choice Act will certainly grow the union's income from dues payers, so they can keep supporting corporately controlled Democrats.
"The Employee Free Choice Act" About the most undemocratic thing that the unions have ever put out. They should be ashamed.
before it disappears off the radar:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/14/obama-brings-clinton-team_n_143795.html
Obama is certainly not center right. How far left is still to be determined. We will hope its just center left or it will be a short run.
Ayers and Bernadine Dorn would do Obama and the left a great favor if they stay quiet and far in the background.
Thomas More:I misspelled Dohrn. They said they kept quiet during the campaign. Amy Goodman wanted to interview them for DemocracyNow. One half of the interview was run today and the rest will air on Monday, Amy G. said. It's a good interview and the transcript is up or will be shortly. www.democracynow.org I enjoyed hearing it on WBAI and will read the transcript. I'm slightly older, I think and there was a lot I didn't know about them.
There's a lot to know. The problem is they represent a perfect weapon for Republicans to use in 2010 and they won't hesitate to use them like McCain did. I believe it would be better if they refrained from raising their profile.
Thanks for the link.
Ardee knew both of them fairly well I think if you want to know more about them.
.My association with both Bernie and Bill is not an issue, Bernie especially was quite active in SDS, on several important committees and a tireless worker too. I would only note that , despite the activities of the Weather Underground which I discussed at some length including the mindset of those days that contributed to a violent solution to our problems, these two are among the best and brightest we have.
I would ask Mr. More especially to read that interview as I believe he holds some media supported and rather cartoonish views of them that might be at least partially dispelled by getting to read their words and ideas.
If given a choice myself I would much prefer Bill Ayers in a governmental role than Dick Cheney.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
I read it you rascal.
"If given a choice myself I would much prefer Bill Ayers in a governmental role than Dick Cheney."
Even I would buy that.