Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
How The Mobile Phone in Your Pocket is Helping to Pay For The Civil War in Congo
GOMA - After two hours, drenched in sweat, he tugs on a cord tied to his waist and is pulled back to the surface, carrying with him a 30 kilogram sack of raw columbium-tantalite ore.
More than 80 per cent of the world's coltan is in Africa, and 80 percent of that lies in territory controlled by Congo's various ragtag rebel groups, armed militia and its corrupt and underfunded national army. Few people have heard of this rare mineral, known as coltan, even though millions of people in the developed world rely on it. But global demand for the mineral, and a handful of other materials used in everything from cellphones to soup tins, is keeping the armies of Congo's ceaseless wars fighting.
More than 80 per cent of the world's coltan is in Africa, and 80 percent of that lies in territory controlled by Congo's various ragtag rebel groups, armed militia and its corrupt and underfunded national army.
Despite Friday's ceasefire summit in the Kenyan capital Nairobi, and visits to Congo by earnest international politicians and diplomats, there will be no peace until the economic forces driving the conflict are addressed, experts warn.
"Until now, this question has been avoided on the basis that it is too sensitive or could derail peace talks," said Patrick Alley, director of Global Witness, a British charity which has investigated the militarisation of Congo's mineral trade.
"That is a short-sighted view. If international dialogues continue to ignore this critical aspect of the conflict, they will not find long-term solutions."
In Congo's North Kivu province, scene of the current bloody conflict, the supply chain that links the sweating miner to the mobile telephone in your pocket starts around Masisi district, the rebel-held area 110 miles northeast of the provincial capital, Goma.
Back up on the surface again, the miner hands his sack of ore to his shift boss, who pays him less than a dollar per kilogramme. Some mines also use child labour, often for no pay at all.
The rocks are then packed into even heavier 50kg loads and passed to porters, who hoist them on to their backs and set off, in flip flops or Wellington boots, for the two-day walk through the mountains to the town of Walikale.
There, the ore is sold once again, now for just over a dollar a kilogramme, to a middleman known as a negociant. He consolidates several loads and calls in an aircraft to land at the town's grass airstrip, collect the rocks and fly them to Goma.
Dotted across Goma, behind high walls and locked gates, there are hundreds of small-scale traders called comptoirs. Men in dusty overalls sit with large piles of rocks in front of them, using a trained eye to scan scan for the chunks likely to yield the best-quality product, samples of which they then grind to assess its coltan purity and how much to pay the negociant accordingly. In an office to the rear, the comptoir director sits in front of his laptop, scanning coltan and cassiterite prices on the internet site of the London Metal Exchange.
"Things have progressed a bit today because we are able to see what is the best price instantly, rather than having to guess as we did before the internet," said Joseph Nzanzu, a comptoir director in Goma.
"But still the process, the negociants, how they come to us with the ore, how we grade it and argue over the price, this is the way it has been for decades."
Gathering hundreds of kilogrammes together, the comptoir loads the ore on to trucks which set off for Mombasa on Kenya's Indian Ocean coast, five days' hard driving away through Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya.
From here, cargo ships carry the coltan to processing plants in the Far East, although it is also traded as a commodity on the London Metal Exchange and in Belgium, Congo's former colonial power. The ore, still hunks of rock just as it was when it came out of the mine, is ground down and refined to extract tantalum, a heat resistant powder which is sold to firms making the capacitors which are found in mobile telephones and other electrical devices.
Finally, the equipment manufacturers buy the capacitors, without which their goods would not work. From North and South Kivu, a total of 428 metric tonnes of coltan was exported in 2007, according to the provincial ministry of mines, worth around £2 million. But these figures are notoriously inaccurate, and take no account of illegally smuggled minerals, likely to make up almost as much again.
There is nothing illegal in buying or using coltan, despite concerns that some of profits from the trade in the Congo helps fund its myriad armed groups. All of the big electronics manufacturers say that they make every effort to ensure that the components in their products are from legitimate mines, either in Congo or in other coltan-producing countries including Brazil and Argentina.
But in Congo's anarchic environment, it is impossible for customers to know for sure that the tantalum in their mobile phone, DVD player, PlayStation or desktop computer did not come from a rebel-held mine. Buyers say that ore from these mines is mixed with that from legitimate mines, and they cannot tell which is which. There is no equivalent of the Kimberley Process, the international system which certifies that diamonds are from conflict-free areas.
The links between Congo's vast riches and its blood-stained history stretch back to the Belgian colonial era, when King Leopold II forced labourers onto his rubber plantations and ordered his agents to chop off the hands of workers who failed to fulfil their harvest quotas.
But throughout the latter half of the 1990s and the beginning of this decade, as Congo descended into two wars, its mineral wealth began directly to stoke its conflict. At the height of a coltan price boom in 2001, the UN estimated that rebel groups were earning $20 million a month from mineral exploitation, though the market price has since fallen.
A 2003 United Nations investigation into the illegal exploitation of natural resources accused both Rwanda and Uganda of prolonging their armed incursions into Congo in order to continue their plunder. Peace was supposed to have come to the region that year. But in the east, the rebels and armed militia remained and proliferated, extending their reach into the mines opened by a series of state mining companies and then abandoned as war swept the country.
Today, these armed groups earn their money either by directly controlling the mines themselves, or by taxing lorries as they pass through their territories. Alongside them, Congo's own army runs various mines and its officers pocket the profits.
There have been calls for an international embargo of the trade in the country's minerals. But that would only hurt its poorest citizens, who have little else to do to earn money, said Mr Nzanzu.
Instead, according to Mr Alley of Global Witness, buyers must double efforts to ensure that they do not trade in any mineral tainted by contact with any of Congo's armed groups.
"For as long as there are buyers who are willing to trade, directly or indirectly, with groups responsible for grave human rights abuses, there is no incentive for these groups to lay down their arms," he said.
"It is not acceptable for buyers to claim they do not or cannot know where the minerals come from. They have a responsibility to find out exactly where the minerals were produced and by whom.
"If there is any likelihood that they have passed through the hands of armed groups or army units, they should refuse to buy them."
- Posted in



16 Comments so far
Show Allhttp://quicksilverscreen.com/watch?video=48945
...just a thought about the picture caption…if the army is corrupt, you don’t really want to call attention to the fact that it’s underfunded do you? I mean, somebody might do something about it. An underfunded corrupt army is better than an up-to-date, fully-equipped, fully-funded corrupt army, right? We in the US should know that better than anyone, right?
"It is not acceptable for buyers to claim they do not or cannot know where the minerals come from. They have a responsibility to find out exactly where the minerals were produced and by whom.
"If there is any likelihood that they have passed through the hands of armed groups or army units, they should refuse to buy them."
I want to send articles like this to the people I send things to, but I can only think of 1 person beside me who doesn’t already have a cell phone. No one without other coltan-containing machines. I don’t see the point in making people feel guilty for something they can’t do anything about now.
So I’m not sure what personal or even political action this leaves us with. If as the article says, it is impossible to know where the coltan in any device came from, only not buying electronics will ensure not buying tainted coltan (despite that hurting--temporarily we hope--the poorest). Always a difficult decision, and not the kind of motivator a clear easy difference would be for fence sitters. Everybody willing to not buy has probably already not bought.
What might help is contact information for blood-free coltan electronics suppliers, (end products—cell phones, etc.) if they exist, activist groups, and officials who are or should be in charge.
It is important to have something to do when confronted with our culture's encouragement of horrors like this. Like the article says though, simply not buying the products or boycotting Congolese materials will make things worse for the poorest people.
Personally, I think it's reasonable for me to feel guilty for having a cell-phone, but I have used that negative to inspire the positive of supporting people working to make these situations better.
I donate the same amount I spend on my phone to these groups:
http://www.congoweek.org (Students have again started leading activism on this issue.)
http://www.urgentactionfund.org/ (Women's Human Rights Africa fund)
And you can even get a fund-raiser CD from: http://cdbaby.com/cd/congosangels
I also did a radio show that raised funds and attention for the same groups: http://accordionnoir.org/drupal/node/85
The Congo wars are all about minerals and the corporate entities (mainly British)who own them. There's a free-for-all in the Congo over precious minerals. The corporate folks need to settle this thing since they run the show.
Dr Wu, the last of the big-time thinkers
AccordianNoire,
A friend of mine, indigenous by ethnicity, told me once that guilt was not productive to addressing the issues they were confronting. Instead what they sought were allies and friends among the white non-native communities to get justice for their people. Similarly the case is true here with respect the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. My wife and I got new cell phones the other day. I didn't know about this until today. It's important to get connected with a movement as was done with the situation in East Timor. The East Timor Action Network struggled for decades to free their people from Indonesian repression. It was long and hard but in the end they won a decisive victory.
As for this resource, coltan, or columbium-tantalite ore, it is used specifically for the manufacture of tantalum capacitors. It is used in DVD players, computers, LCD screens, IPods, Sony PS-2 play stations and other electronic applications because of its compactness and high reliability. To start to turn this around Bayer would be a juicy target to pressure because of their links to illegal coltan trafficking.
You can read more about the coltan trade at Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coltan
Former Tutsi soldier Abdul Ruzibiza, has described the 1994 conduct of the Rwandan Patriotic Front in the most savage detail. He says that this supposed army of liberation attacked the civilian population of Rwanda without pity (“nous avions l'ordre strict massacrer toute la population sans exception”), bombing Hutu refugee camps with heavy artillery (“des fois les bombes explosaient au milieu d'un camp et tuaient des innocents”), poisoning the drinking water (“intoxiquer l'eau potable des déplacés de guerre”), and even killing their own relatives (that is, the Rwandan Tutsi) and blaming it on the Hutu, so that world opinion would be swayed in their favor. (www.rwanda.be/news/article.php3?id_article=51)
Another former RPF soldier, Deus Kagiraneza, spoke before the Afro-American Network in Maryland in 2001. He takes the official story of what happened in Rwanda and Congo, and turns it practically upside down. “I ask for forgiveness,” says Kagireneza. (www.inshuti.org/kagirana.htm)
“Pour moi c'était acceptable,” says Ruzibiza, as he described his acquiescence in gross violations and duplicity, the ultimate aim of which was “pour trouver des prétextes d'aller piller les richesses au Zaïre.”
Thus do Paul Kagame’s officers confront the aftermath of genocide in Rwanda, as it spilled over into the Congo, causing not a civil war but an international conflict, while heedless Americans with their unceasing technological demands, accepted their share of the plunder. This was already an old story when Adam Hochschild wrote “Chaos in Congo Suits Many Parties Just Fine,” New York Times, April 20, 2003, found at...
www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/congo/2003/0420suits.htm.
If those with hands-on participation in this orgy of bloodshed can come to the realization that they are in need of forgiveness, perhaps there is hope for the rest us. Thank you, Mike Pflanz, for trying to help us all make sense of it.
I'd suggest guilt isn't exactly a sucessful tactic, especially about ordinary things.
What do you cell-heads need, then, to wake you up? Images of bloody corpses, severed hands and heads, steaming guts on the floor of the jungle? No, not even the collatoral murder of the magnificent mountain gorillas, for the same minerals, would affect greedy self-centered westerners bent on endless paltry chatting (mostly in public where you can be "seen")with total disregard for the plunder they cause...
calling people names never helps anything.
our biggest problem in the world is the "good" vs "evil" paradigm that ends discussion just when it needs to get started.
Don't start with the cell phone users, unless you are willing to also deal with the users of virtually every precious metal. - got a gold ring? know where it came from?
We need to instead demand that all precious metals are accurately sourced - boycotting cell phones won't do much.
I know that the next time I shop for a phone for my 15 year old daughter, I'll make sure I demand to know the source of the phone's precious metals, and make enough noise to know it gets reported up the chain.
I'm certainly not going to take away her cell phone - lord knows that would take years off my life - it was hard enough getting them to stop using bottled water.
Changed my mind, this type of thing doesn't deserve attention.
Thanks for some rationality coopersy.
I will bet you that if this was mined by union labor with reasonable environmental controls and a portion of the value was given to the people in the country there would be no need for all the violence.
If the cell phones were required to be reprogramable (so they can be reused and resold by other people) and recycled when they fail (with a sufficient deposit to ensure recycling) the negative impact of cell phones could be reduced.
If the cell phones were made repairable with mostly standardized parts they could be used for a long time - reducing environmental damage further.
One person to really refer to on Africa, including Congo or DRC, is Keith Harmon Snow, http://www.allThingsPass.com .
I can say a little more on this, from a paper I did for a course in college in the early 1980s, besides what we already get in high school or less on slavery in the U.S. and which much neglects to cover Haiti and the rest of the Americas; as well as Australia. We do get some early education on all of that, and also British "colonisation" of India, but, in the latter case, the slavery hindus regained power and restored their slavery caste system, which we don't have in Australia and the Americas, where Brits and other Europeans managed to maintain much of their slavery systems; directly, and through descendants, like in Colombia, f.e. Not only Colombia, but much so nonetheless.
What is this? Roman Empire DISEASE, or ... what? Disease or syndrome? What is it?! Well, I guess not, given Hindus have had their slavery, oppression, ... caste system for ages; but I'm not historian and maybe that caste'ing bs was adopted from Britain or the Roman Empire (I don't have a clue, only knowing that it's obviously wrong).
In any case, I don't think it's Roman or European, but malicious human. We always had traitor Blacks in Africa, traitor indigenous in other regions of Earth, and nationally (f.e., when Joan of Arc sought to form, formed, and led an army, against external predators and (internal) traitors, both, she fought against both and not against the British people, just their dumb soldiers who served the "elites", like we have for most soldiers today). We always have the external predators and (internal) traitors; and the dummies who serve without realising what their real purpose or use is, while the ruling "elites" do know the purpose and won't talk about it publicly! Distractions, lies, fabricated stories, ... we have it [all], so we [need] to wake up and realise that we can't just go around obeying in blind terms! No majors, no generals, colonels, admirals, presidents, etcetera; we must always [think] for ourselves! Voila, a significant meaning of [individual conscience]! Voila why we have IVAW, VFP, and so on! Voila!
Like I said many enough times, humanity has [not] really evolved. Sure, we have tech. means today that we didn't have in the past, but this is [nothing]. Given the [rest], our so-called evolution is NOT evolution; it [is] [de]-volution! We have [not] evolved!
In his email subscription, KHS also provided the link to the following article and I haven't read it yet, but it's evidently very important based on what he says in this email alert; plus what I have read of his extensive articles in the past. KHS is perhaps not, I suppose not, the sole expert on Africa, but "man", "gal", is he very extensive. You can find of his writings at his above website, the author index at www.globalreserch.ca, www.towardFreedom.com , and possibly other websites. Just loaded TF now, to see that it's indeed '.com' and it evidently is, but quickly see that an article there or re-posted there is by Johann Hari, of Independent, UK, and KHS warns about JH, so [beware] of what JH says. I already knew before coming across KHS's articles that matters were very bad in much of Africa and because of western corporations; anyone who pretends, in any way whatsoever, that the "West" is not very guilty for the problems in Africa is either lying or else very under-informed; the West's imperialists, etcetera, have been there for a long time already and they're not about giving up the natural riches of that continent without a serious fight.
From the streets I much come from and I know that there is NO 'towards freedom' without serious struggle; there is [not]! It is not disneyland!
"A World Playground: Congolese People Sacrificed for International Games and Profits",
by Roxanne Stasyszyn, Nov. 8, 2008
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/11/a-world-playground-congolese-people-sacrificed-for-international-games-and-profits/
Sacrificing people fits with Roman-ism, and all of the rest I mentioned, above. I'm weared by and wary of it, but evidently many others aren't. Primitive profits, to be made; ya know!
'Congolese People Sacrificed'? Yes! That's what has been too long happening!
I'd quote KHS's email, for he lists numerous enough U.S. "news" media that have been keeping this information ... unknown in the U.S. or West, but am not sure I can quote like this, so won't. (Subscribe; it won't hurt!) But it's [many], many enough msm U.S. "news" media anyway. So, BEWARE of what you read; and not only about U.S. "news" media.
I've been glad that some news is being reported on the minerals aspect of the Congo, but didn't read the recent articles posted at CD and held them as suspect, for while they speak of the minerals exploitation, this doesn't say what the rest of these articles do say. Yet I still supported the idea that they were at least mentioning the minerals exploitation, instead of only stories of "apes" and women being raped; not that women being raped is good, no way, or that jungle apes are being "genocided", which is also not good; but why these women are being raped often is a much more serious matter, and KHS (and some others) [explain] what's really going on. Yes, there's the rape; yes, there's massacring of apes; yes. But there's importantly more and we need to know what that involves. It's the same as Jesus taught, to not judge based only on apparences; we must find out what's really happening behind what strikes us as apparent. It takes [investigators]; we need truly investigative reporters, for without them, oh muck, we're left with apparences and don't know what lies [behind]. We need to get to the [behind] "stuff".
Diamonds in South Africa, coltan in the Congo, labor in China, etc. Modern global industry is nothing BUT slavery and exploitation. Remember how NAFTA was supposed to raise all boats? How has that worked out? They sent decent living-wage jobs overseas to sweat shops, and destroyed the US economy in the process. That's right, and now there are many fewer high-paying jobs than there once were, and the credit's run out. So what happened to their market? Who's left to buy those crappy goods and appliances? Watch shopping during this Christmas season, it should be quite telling.
Economies are all interdependent, as we are individually, it is a relationship. That relationship is now so inequitable that it is clearly unsustainable, and yet the idiots at the top continue with the same inane and insane policies. The corporate greed that promoted NAFTA to maximize their profits essentially killed their golden goose: the consumer. They destroyed and are continuing to destroy the very thing that they need to sustain their profits, heck even to break even. What good is a 'free market' if there is NO market?
So now, everywhere, you find people struggling to survive. To do this they are killing each other and/or destroying the environment. And unless mankind changes its course dramatically, and greatly improves its economic relationships, things will continue to worsen. This cannot happen without an individual awakening, though. Many who complain about their bloody toe, are unaware that they are stubbing it themselves while sleep-walking at night, meaning that the vast majority do not realize how they are contributing to their own demise, and the demise of the whole (ignorance does not absolve us from the consequences of our actions, regardless of what we believe or how fervently we believe it) If more players wake up, the play itself will take on a different form, and will not be the insane drama we're witnessing now. Anything short of that will not work, not refraining from eating soup or using cell phones.
Basically continuing with my prior post:
A new "iron curtain" of media sort, around the USA? There's also the following "tidbit", and this is much. BEWARE, though, for there are pictures in this article that [not] everyone will be able to or can view, I think. You all want to read the article and, if possible, view the pictures, too; [unbelievable] consequences of western tech. warfare, but real. There's the text of the article and then the pictures, so everyone can at least read the text portion. I have heart arythmia sort of problems and I don't need these kinds of pictures to come "my way", but need to know what is going on (theoretically 'need' to know, anyway). I'm not a "happy camper" at all in this "campsite" called Earth.
Also, I think some of these pictures appear to not be recent, for some seem much like, if not identical to, pictures in what I think was a 1992 article, by an Iraqi MD, perhaps, and on 'extreme deformities' (can use that for Web search to check for yourself and the article has been copied to many websites). That was, I also believe to recall, extreme deformities of Iraqis, children anyway, due to the U.S. having used much D.U. during the first Gulf War of the U.S. there. It seemed odd to me, for some of the children with these E.D.'s weren't newborns, but then maybe these deformations have not been extremely deforming only newborns, which (I guess anyway) is likely enough true and would help to eliminate the odd aspect I wondered about. I'm definitely not MD of any kind, but we're told to be very careful when getting x-rays, that this can lead to development of cancers or tumors, cancerous tumors (whatever the consequences can be, but bad, we are or at least used to be told).
If, however, it's only newborns who are extremely affected like this, then I also guess we could suspect that some of the extreme deformities aren't due to only D.U.; but then we have the Israeli bombing of the Iraqi nuclear plant in ... I believe 1983. I don't know that that military strike caused radiological poisoning of Iraq, never having read mention of this; only having read of the bombing and destruction of the plant. But it was a nuclear plant or power plant, or for making "nukes", nuclear anyway, and I'd expect such a strike would cause radiological leakage into the environment. Maybe the plant was not yet completed, the construction, maybe there was nothing radiological there at the time, but I never read of such details, either. Some people have said that Gulf War Syndrome, f.e., has been caused in part due to rad. poisoning of the environment and people, but also the U.S. having bombed Iraqi plants and/or oil industry infrastructure that caused toxic poisoning of the environment.
Iow, I'm not expert on this topic, but can clearly see that the extreme deformities are NOT normal and expect that warring on Iraq has been the sole or, else, most serious cause.
"Bush Missing Iraq WMD has Been Found in Iraq and One Million U.S. Soldiers are its Victims",
by PRWeb.com (press release), Oct 29 2008,
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m48373
That article, btw, also provides an "understandable" reason for why PM Chretien and the Cdn govt did not want to send CAF ground forces into Iraq; not for good reasons, but for D.U. reasons! If that's true, then Ca did not stay out of the ground war in Iraq for good reasons, for if it hadn't been for the major use of D.U. by the U.S., then we're to believe Ca would've had ground CAF sent to Iraq, for the criminal war. And while I don't like this, it's believable.
I think it's from that article, somehow, but had to get the link through a Web search, and it's a video with Doug Weir of CADU in England, nearly 30 minutes long, about D.U. used by the U.S. and maybe U.K., possibly also Israel (?). I think we all want to view and listen to this, but am in a "tight" situation and come across links to information I can't always read or view, yet think this is one "piece" we should all and carefully listen to (if not, then I'll hopefully come to learn that this isn't recommendable after all, but believe, for now, that it is). CADU is not a junior sort of organisation; from what I've gathered about it and which is little information, but cadu seems authentic, a real resource.
"Video: Depleted Uranium - Iraq's nuclear Nightmare",
by Campaign Against Depleted Uranium, www.cadu.org.uk, Oct 20 2008,
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m48104
The actual video page is the following.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3282290837712416408
I often wondered why the capitalist bastards allowed/condoned/participated in the destruction of the Congo region. They appear to have little retrievable oil.
The article on coltan has enlightened me. I have allowed myself a computer only to be in touch with information being denied me by the capitalist-controlled media.
I am now even more encouraged by the fact that I have no cell phone. These for profit and nothing but for profit assholes make me want to puke.
Wake up, people.