Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Spike in Iraq Deaths Follows Grim Milestone of Dead US troops

WASHINGTON - Civilian deaths spiked in Iraq over the past week, around the same time the United Stated marked the fifth anniversary of the war and the milestone of 4,000 US troop deaths, a US military official said.0325 04 1

There were roughly 480 incidents of violence across Iraq last week, up five percent over the previous week, with a marked increase in high-profile suicide bomb attacks, the official said on condition of anonymity.

That level of violence was still well below peaks reached last year at the height of the surge in US forces into Iraq, though it is too soon to tell whether the increase signals a new trend, the official said.

“So far everything is still well below the worst of the worst, but we want to make sure that trend continues,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The US death toll for the five-year-old war hit the 4,000 mark over the weekend, with the killing of four soldiers in a roadside bombing in Baghdad.

Meanwhile Iraqi civilian deaths climbed even more steeply, by 18 percent according to the official, who put the number of civilian deaths at 71, up from 60 the previous week.

Casualties of all kinds — civilian, coalition and Iraqi security forces — have totaled about 1,190 dead so far this month in about 1,500 incidents, the official said.

“I haven’t seen anything that says the trend is definitely going up,” said the official, who acknowledged that increased suicide attacks and high profile bombings in recent weeks have raised concerns.

“Are they shifting tactics? Is it because the weather is better?” he said.

The military is particularly vigilant now as the drawdown of the extra US combat brigades sent to Iraq as part of a surge begins in earnest.

Speaking to CNN television General David Petraeus, the highest US commander in Iraq, also noted the increase in violence, including “some sensational attacks.”

David Walker, head of Government Accountability Office (GAO) the congressional watchdog organization, noted recently that “while security has improved in Iraq, a permissive security environment has yet to be achieved.”

The second of the five surge brigades has largely completed its redeployment, and three others are supposed to move out by July, bringing US force levels to around 140,000 troops. Currently, there are some 156,000 US troops in country.

As US combat power in Iraq is reduced, Iraqi security forces are supposed to take up the slack.

Petraeus has urged a pause in the US drawdown after July to see how the Iraqi security forces perform and whether further cuts in US force levels are possible.

Petraeus is expected to make more detailed recommendations on the pace and scope of the drawdown early next month in testimony to Congress.

General George Casey, Petraeus’ predecessor in Iraq and now the army chief of staff, had argued when he was in command in Baghdad that a surge in forces to Iraq would only dampen the violence temporarily unless Shiites and Sunnis reconciled.

Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said the surge had created the “opportunity for governments, particularly at the local level, the space and time to get some traction there.

“It’s also given us some time to further develop the Iraqi security forces, which now are increasingly taking the lead and responsibility for the security functions,” he said.

But he said US commanders were mindful of the risks of drawing down forces.

“We want to do it in a careful and deliberate way so that any repositioning that needs to take place, any turnover of responsibility to Iraqi forces is done in such a manner that we don’t have any backsliding,” he said.

© 2008 Agence France Presse

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

7 Comments so far

  1. debate March 25th, 2008 11:09 am

    snails move faster than the resolution of this war.

  2. citizenblog March 25th, 2008 4:17 pm

    terrestrial snails mate and reproduce at this time of year

  3. AlexLawyer March 25th, 2008 9:03 pm

    No pile of bodies (4000 American and probably about 1 million Iraqi), no amount of violence, no count of the warring factions, no perusal of the failed reconstruction effort, no number of refugees (more than 4 million), and no accounting (up to $3 trillion final cost) will dissuade McCain from his belief that we are winning the war, that’s it’s been well worthwhile, and that we should continue with the same brilliant strategy. There is a term for denial of reality on such a scale: psychosis. If the American people elect him it will be an epic, colossal misjudgment.

  4. KEM PATRICK March 25th, 2008 11:02 pm

    How long before the Iraqi’s run out of people?

    I imagine Cheney has it figured out and that’s why McCain said 100 years.

  5. greatbear215 March 26th, 2008 8:03 am

    Instead of the war-whores living in the WHite House or sitting in front of a microphone-they should be grabbed right by the scruff of their necks, slapped in handcuffs, and marched off to the Hague. It’s the right place for em’ and it’s the right way to treat em,’ too.

  6. Dan March 26th, 2008 8:47 am

    Let us not forget McCain’s role in the Viet Nam war.
    He apparently believed that the VietNam conflict was
    worth the one million Vietnamese casualties we produced.
    (and with agent Orange still quietly working- more to follow)

    Remember Forrest Gump- the movie?
    Coming from a military family,
    a McCain has fought in every war since?

  7. bobpomeroy March 26th, 2008 11:15 am

    How long will we be caught in the analysis? We need to surrender our chief war criminals to the World Court, seek UN controlled rehabilitation, and start digging into our pockets, starting with those who have sponsored or benefitted the war.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org