SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
August, 02 2010, 02:39pm EDT
Contact:
Claudette Juska, Researcher Specialist, 202-319-2475;
Joe Smyth, Media Officer, 831-566-5647, joe.smyth@greenpeace.org
Government Industry Links and Hidden Causes of Gulf Disaster to Be Exposed Through Law
Greenpeace Submits Twenty Seven Freedom of Information Act Inquiries, Two State Public Records Act requests on BP Oil Disaster
WASHINGTON
Greenpeace is using legal means to expose the true scale of the
impact and the real causes of the Gulf oil disaster, describing links
between government and the oil industry as critical.
Greenpeace Friday submitted 27 separate Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests to multiple federal government agencies and two Public
Records Act requests to the offices of Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal
and Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, seeking information about
chemical dispersants, government communications with BP and other oil
companies, underwater oil plumes, impacts to marine wildlife, and oil
drilling safety regulation.
"The Gulf oil disaster and the efforts to hide and downplay its impacts
have revealed the extent of the oil industry's grip on our government,"
said Greenpeace Research Director Kert Davies, "Scientific researchers,
policymakers and the broader public deserve to know the full scope of
this disaster and what the government knows and isn't telling."
The federal agencies receiving Greenpeace FOIA requests include the:
* Department of Interior: Minerals Management Service/Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement, Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Geological Survey
* Environmental Protection Agency
* National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
* Navy
* Coast Guard
* Federal Aviation Administration
The scope of these FOIA requests were derived from our ongoing field
research, tips from local activists and reporters. Some of the FOIA
requests seek information on:
Chemical dispersants:
Internal communications within and between the Environmental Protection
Agency, U.S. Coast Guard and BP concerning directives on dispersant use
and exemptions granted to BP by the Coast Guard (EPA, USCG)
Details of the effectiveness of sub-sea dispersant application, how the
Environmental Protection Agency has monitored BP's use of dispersants,
and the point at which dispersants have a greater environmental impact
than leaked oil (EPA)
Flight records of C-130 aircraft carrying chemical dispersants (FAA, USCG)
Wildlife impacts:
Details of any communications about "carcass collection facilities" in the Gulf region (USFWS)
Details regarding turtles being killed in controlled oil burns in the Gulf region (USCG, NOAA, USFWS)
Details of any and all communications or information regarding any of 23
endangered, threatened, or species of concern in the Gulf region
including sperm whales and sea turtles (NOAA, USCG)
Details of U.S. Navy flights contracted for whale and dolphin sightings in the Gulf region (Navy)
Oil drilling safety regulation:
Details of communication between the United States Coast Guard and
ExxonMobil, Shell Oil, and/or ConocoPhillips concerning the safety of
oil rigs in the Gulf and/or the term "blowout preventers" (USCG)
Details of all internal communications regarding the 23 blowouts that have occurred on oil rigs in the Gulf since 2006 (BOEMRE)
Details of any information concerning the 27,000 abandoned wells in the Gulf (BOEMRE/MMS)
Details of communications between the Minerals Management Service and
the Offshore Operators Committee Deep Spills Working Group (BOEMRE/MMS)
Details of violations and inspections and the certification process of the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port facility (USCG)
Clean up operations:
Details of all communications regarding BP employees or contractors concerning their authority to police public lands. (USCG)
Underwater oil plumes:
Internal communications from NOAA missions to search for underwater oil plumes (NOAA)
Details of all meetings and correspondence between the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration and BP regarding underwater oil plumes
(NOAA)
Communication between oil companies and state offices:
Details of any and all internal and external communications between
Governor Bobby Jindal or any of his staff and the following companies:
BP, Shell, Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips, and/or the American Petroleum
Institute (Office of Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal)
Details of any and all internal and external communications between
Governor Haley Barbour or any of his staff and the following companies:
BP, Shell, Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips, and/or the American Petroleum
Institute (Office of Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour)
A full list of the 27 FOIAs and two State Public Records Act requests
can be found here:
https://members.greenpeace.org/blog/greenpeaceusa_blog/2010/08/02/greenpeace-submits-twenty-nine-inquiries
Greenpeace's team on the Gulf Coast has been providing and supporting an
independent assessment of the impacts of the oil disaster to the
ecosystem and the wildlife and communities that depend on it. In August,
the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise will begin a three month expedition
supporting independent scientists to investigate the impacts to Gulf
wildlife, underwater oil plumes, and more.
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000LATEST NEWS
Iran Accuses Trump Allies of 'Fascist Mindset' Akin to Hitler for Invoking Ancient Empires to Justify Aggression
"Even though the US has no ancient empire, it now claims to represent the 'West' and uses European history to justify its brutal military aggression on the Iranian nation," said a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry.
Apr 01, 2026
As President Donald Trump and his allies invoke the conquests of ancient empires to justify waging war across the Middle East, a leading Iranian diplomat says they have adopted a "fascist mindset."
"Even though the US has no ancient empire, it now claims to represent the 'West' and uses European history to justify its brutal military aggression on the Iranian nation," wrote Esmaeil Baqaei, the spokesperson for Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a post to social media Tuesday.
The regional war launched at the end of February by the US and Israel has entailed numerous attacks on civilian infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, residential areas, and water and energy facilities in Iran and Lebanon.
The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said on Tuesday that at least 1,598 civilians have been killed in Iran, including 244 children. The Lebanese Health Ministry said on Wednesday that at least 1,318 people had been killed since Israel began its assault on Lebanon, including 125 children.
As Baqaei pointed out, multiple figures in Trump's orbit have justified the carnage by portraying the war as an existential conflict of civilizations.
He referenced a comment made by former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon, who is now one of MAGA World's most popular podcasters.
In a recent episode of Bannon's War Room show, he called for "total war" against Iran and said the US was "gonna go back and redo what Alexander the Great did 2,300 years ago."
STEVE BANNON: If we're gonna go to war, let's go to total war. And what I mean by total war, let's shut down everybody trading with them. Let's go to UAE and say, hey, you’ve got like two hours to go to Dubai and shut it all down. The Pirate Cove in Dubai. Gotta stop. We gotta… pic.twitter.com/t4xDqSmCS5
— Bannon’s WarRoom (@Bannons_WarRoom) March 28, 2026
Bannon was referring to the Macedonian general's famous invasion of Persia in 330 BCE. Alexander's conquest, which led to the absorption of Persia, was carried out with historic brutality—from the mass killing, displacement, and enslavement of countless people to the razing of entire cities like Persepolis and Tyre.
Similarly, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), perhaps the most vocal proponent of a full-scale invasion of Iran, asserted on Fox News Sunday that with overwhelming military might, the US could end a “2,000-year-long conflict,” as if to imply that the modern hostilities between the West and Iran are ancient and intractable when they are actually less than 50 years old.
"Such distorted historical references are revealingly similar to Nazi and fascist thinking," Baqaei said, said, pointing to the German and Italian dictators Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.
"Adolf Hitler justified invading other countries by invoking 'Lebensraum' and praising the Roman Empire," he said. "Mussolini used the glory of the Roman Empire to excuse his aggressions in North Africa."
Baqaei's comments also come as Israel has launched a ground invasion of southern Lebanon, which it has suggested will result in an indefinite occupation. Defense Minister Israel Katz has described plans to fully demolish Lebanese villages adjacent to Israel's border without allowing displaced residents to return.
The New York Times reported on Wednesday that Israeli officials are also privately discussing plans to press Lebanon's Christian and Druse communities to "force out any Lebanese from neighboring Shiite Muslim communities who have sought refuge among them as Israeli bombardments flatten Shiite towns.”
Some figures in Israel's growingly influential far-right have described the conquest of Lebanon as part of a broader project to establish "Greater Israel," which would expand the nation's territory to neighboring states across the Middle East and clear out local populations to be colonized by Jewish settlers.
The expansionist vision, and the accelerating violent displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank by Israeli settlers, has been described by critics as an eerie parallel to the Nazi goal of creating "Lebensraum" by pushing out or killing ethnic groups viewed as racially inferior, particularly Jews, in order to create "living space" for Germans.
Portrayals of the war in Iran as a civilizational clash are omnipresent among Trump's closest allies. Some, like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, portray it as part of a holy "crusade" by Christendom against the Muslim world. Others like White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt have described it as a war to defend "Western civilization" from "brutal terrorists" who want to destroy it.
Baqaei said, however, that comments lionizing the war as a renewal of bloody old-world conquest is "reviving" a "dangerous pre-World War II fascist mindset—torpedoing the very modern values of human rights and international law the West claims to stand for."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Supreme Court Observers See Trump Birthright Citizenship Order on Thin Ice After Skeptical Reception
The majority of Supreme Court justices expressed "profound skepticism toward the government’s revisionist history of the 14th Amendment, with most sounding downright hostile," wrote one legal reporter.
Apr 01, 2026
Some legal experts who listened to oral arguments at the US Supreme Court on Wednesday came away with the impression that a majority of justices were skeptical of President Donald Trump's executive order that unilaterally reinterprets the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
During the hearing, many observers noted that some conservative justices—including John Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett—all asked pointed questions of US Solicitor General John Sauer, who was presenting the case in defense of the Trump executive order that declared an end to birthright citizenship in the country, despite more than a century of legal precedent.
After listening to the arguments, Georgetown University Law Center professor Steve Vladeck predicted that the final verdict would be "7-2 to block the executive order," and maybe even an 8-1 vote.
"This wasn't (and won't be) close," said Vladeck.
Cornell Law School professor Michael C. Dorf shared Vladeck's view that a clear majority of the court would likely vote to strike down the Trump order, but he cautioned that it could give the court cover to issue less extreme rulings that would nonetheless erode Americans' rights.
"Don't get me wrong: I'm relieved that this case is shaping up as either 8-1 or 7-2 against the Trump executive order," Dorf explained. "But the case is a gift to the Supreme Court. By rejecting an outlandish position, it will earn credibility as apolitical, even as the Overton window moves far to the right."
Elie Mystal, justice correspondent at The Nation, said after watching the hearings that he simply could not imagine a majority of the court ruling in Trump's favor.
"What I don't think is a possibility is 5-4 Trump wins," he wrote. "We have [Amy Coney Barrett]. We have Roberts. We almost certainly have Gorsuch (possibly as a concurrence). I CANNOT count to five on a Trump win here. So... good. I mean, terrible that it's gotten his far. But good."
Author and former CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin wasn't ready to make a full prediction on the outcome of the case, but he did note that "the birthright citizenship argument is going poorly for the Trump Administration."
Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern found that the Supreme Court hearing "quickly shaped up to be a blowout against the administration," with seven justices expressing "profound skepticism toward the government’s revisionist history of the 14th Amendment, with most sounding downright hostile toward the pseudo-originalist theory cooked up to legitimize the policy."
In fact, Stern thought that the administration's arguments before the court were so unconvincing that he found it "alarming" that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito appeared convinced by its rationales.
All the same, he predicted that Trump's birthright citizenship order "is about to go down in flames."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leading in Primary by 38 Points, Platner Takes Aim at Collins' Wall Street Cash and Iran War Support
"We need to defeat Susan Collins," said the Senate candidate. "That work can’t wait until June."
Apr 01, 2026
As Maine's US Senate primary draws near, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills has gone negative—focusing on online posts that her rival, political newcomer Graham Platner, wrote more than a decade ago.
But with poll after poll showing Platner beating the governor by double digits—and with the gap getting larger with each attack ad Mills releases—Platner this week turned his attention away from the primary race altogether, releasing an ad focusing on Republican Sen. Susan Collins, whom the Democrats are hoping to unseat next November.
In a one-minute ad released online Tuesday evening, Platner is seen in black and white at one of the many rallies he's held across Maine since launching his campaign last August, where he's spoken in support of Medicare for All, condemned President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign and war in Iran, and spoken out against oligarchy.
Collins, Platner tells the audience in the ad, "is the epitome of the establishment politician who serves the donors and serves herself, who is cynical and duplicitous, who's willing to say one thing and do another."
"We had to shed her from our politics. Quite frankly, we have to shed all the people like her," Platner continues as a musician plays the labor movement anthem, "Which Side Are You On?"
We need to defeat Susan Collins. That work can’t wait until June. So we plan to make clear to Mainers starting today: Susan Collins is not on our side.
Every dollar you donate to the ActBlue link in the reply will go directly behind this ad, to taking back this Senate seat. pic.twitter.com/djyuwSHfiI
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) March 31, 2026
While Platner addresses the crowd, text appears on screen:
"Collins raked in Wall Street cash before advancing Trump tax bill," it reads at one point, referring to the $2 million donation Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman gave to the senator's super political action committee (PAC) one day before she voted to advance President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which contained tax cuts for the rich as it slashed public programs like Medicaid and federal food assistance.
"Collins accepts thousands from insurers while health costs soar," the text continues, citing a Maine Beacon article about $120,000 in campaign donations from PACs associated with for-profit health insurance companies—"the same companies now raising premiums on Mainers by as much as 23% in 2026."
"Collins expresses support for Trump's war in Iran," the text reads at another point, regarding the senator's comment last month that Trump has "inherent abilities as commander-in-chief to react" to what he claimed was a threat posed by Iran when he began attacking the country along with Israel.
A poll released by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research last week showed nearly 6-in-10 Americans say the war has gone too far. Fifty-six percent of respondents to a Data for Progress survey last month said the war would benefit Israel more than the US, and this week two polls found a majority of Jewish Americans oppose the war.
"We need to defeat Susan Collins. That work can’t wait until June," said Platner on Tuesday, referring to the June 9 primary. "So we plan to make clear to Mainers starting today: Susan Collins is not on our side."
The ad was released as the latest polling from Impact Research found 66% of likely Democratic primary voters backing Platner, with just 28% supporting the governor.
That poll bolsters other recent surveys that have found Platner with a commanding lead, including at least one other that was taken after Mills launched her first negative ad against her opponent. A second ad was released days later, focusing on the same subject matter: comments Platner made on Reddit in 2013 about sexual assault survivors, which the candidate has said don't represent his current views.
"Janet Mills going negative backfired," said Ryan Grim of Drop Site News, "which doesn’t bode well for Collins either."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular