Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Locked in Burma
After 13 years of detention, Aung San Suu Kyi perfectly represents the suffering of the Burmese people, effectively trapped in the world's biggest prison. Pressure is building on the UN to act
It is hard to imagine what life must be like for Aung San Suu Kyi, locked up inside her Rangoon home, separated from her children, denied visitors, her phone line cut, her mail intercepted. Burma's opposition leader, whose 1990 election victory was annulled by the military, is now in her 13th year of detention. She has been held continually since 2003. In June she spent her 63rd birthday alone.
Unconfirmed reports suggest Suu Kyi, who has suffered health problems in the past, is unwell again. Her lawyer, Kyi Win, who was allowed to see her last month, quoted her as saying: "I am tired and I need some rest." Following her refusal of a food delivery, there is also speculation the pro-democracy campaigner and Nobel peace prizewinner has begun a hunger strike. Her lawyer said her weight had fallen below the 7st she was known to weigh in 2003.
While uncertainty surrounds Suu Kyi's plight, there is nothing at all ambiguous about Burma's political, social and human rights situation one year after the junta brutally suppressed the Buddhist-monk-led "saffron revolution". By almost any measure, it is distinctly worse. Last May's Cyclone Nargis disaster played its part. But most of the deterioration is man-made.
Despite last autumn's storm of international condemnation and impassioned calls for action, the junta continues to hold more than 2,000 political prisoners, including leaders of Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) such as U Win Tin, in jail since 1989. UN attempts to foster political reform have got nowhere. And trade sanctions imposed by the US and EU are being undermined by the generals' energy deals with China, Thailand and India. Oil and gas sales topped $3.3bn (£1.85bn) last year.
According to Benjamin Zawacki of Amnesty International, half a million people are internally displaced. He said the army is continuing "systematic" rights violations against Karen and other ethnic minorities including "extrajudicial killings, torture, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, forced labour, crop destruction [and] restrictions of movement".
Amid some of the worst poverty, health problems and corruption in the world, many people now have only one wish: escape. Even long-suffering Zimbabweans have an option to flee to neighbouring countries. But the Burmese are locked in, held down by their rulers and not wanted in India, China or Thailand. With an estimated population of more than 50 million, Burma has become the world's biggest prison camp.
"The UN mission has been a complete failure," said Mark Farmaner, director of Burma Campaign UK. Since Ibrahim Gambari, a former Nigerian foreign minister, was appointed special envoy in May 2006, the number of political prisoners had doubled, ethnic cleansing in eastern Burma had intensified, and humanitarian aid for Cyclone Nargis victims was blocked, he said.
"There has been a massive deterioration in the human rights situation. But during Gambari's last two visits no senior member of the regime bothered to see him," Farmaner said. "He is seen as biased towards the regime and we think he should resign. He no longer has the respect or confidence of either side."
Criticism of Gambari was also voiced by the NLD. It said his visits, the last of which ended on August 23, had produced "no positive developments". The party said the UN envoy's offer to help the junta organise elections in 2010 under a new constitution that the opposition rejects had undermined his independence. For her part, ill or not, Suu Kyi twice refused to meet Gambari, reportedly leaving him standing on her doorstep.
Farmaner said the time had come for Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, to take personal charge before the country exploded again. He is due to visit Burma in December following talks with Asian leaders. "There have been 37 UN visits in 20 years but things just get worse. Now they need to set timelines and benchmarks which the junta must meet. The first benchmark should be the release of all political prisoners," he said. It was also essential the UN security council fully back the process, and be ready to pass a punitive resolution if the generals did not comply.
Farmaner praised Gordon Brown who he said was personally committed to ending the impasse and actively raised Burma at the UN and in other forums. But other western leaders, and countries with real leverage such as China, were less concerned now the media spotlight illuminated by last autumn's revolt had shifted elsewhere.
"There is an increasing sense of desperation," Farmaner said. "People were very depressed after the uprising, very frightened. But there was hope that Gambari would do something. Now that hope has gone and there is even more repression than before. At the moment, the fear is stronger than the anger. But that could change."
- Posted in



3 Comments so far
Show AllThe Burmese junta are a first rate gang of thugs, BUT, since they do not particularly like Bush, expect them to get a pass here. Like Zimbabwe, Tibet, Georgia, Iran, etc, if the government doing the oppressing is anti-American, the oppression is forgiven.
Her late husband was British and she left her family in London to pursue politics in Burma. She has been offered freedom if she leaves the country and refuses, so is under house arrest and has been for much of her 20 year stay.
Her father had negotiated independence with the British in 1948 and was soon assassinated. The Karen National Union (KNU), supported by the British, then started an insurrection that has continued till today. It's likely the assassination of her father was done by this group due to his earlier support for the Japanese against the Karen during the war.
I do not know if she does what she does out of free will or is fearful for her childrens welfare and her own if she returns to Britain. If it is the latter it is a great tragedy.
Whatever the truth is, you can be sure the version of the truth we are given is not it.
Generally when you see events triggered on dates like 8-8-88 (the 8888 revolution) and 8-8-08 (Georgia invasion of S. Ossetia), then our hands (and the Brits-we are one and the same now) are behind it.
"TruthTeller September 2nd, 2008 1:22 pm
The Burmese junta are a first rate gang of thugs, BUT, since they do not particularly like Bush, expect them to get a pass here. Like Zimbabwe, Tibet, Georgia, Iran, etc, if the government doing the oppressing is anti-American, the oppression is forgiven."
THAT SOUNDS ODD, for the reality normally is the opposite; show an evil, despotic, ... dictator and he or she is usually pals with the U.S. govt's top officials and ruling elites. When good or resistant, obstructive some people might or would say, state leaders don't bend to the whims of the U.S. govt's elites, then they see to either outting or overthrowing that state leader, replacing the person with an evil, ... kind, just like the U.S. elites favour. Burma is another case of U.S. covert ops of various kinds and for natural resources; such as oil, f.e. But it has to do with natural resources, oil anyway, in another way, the shipping; given the straits Burma is nearby and, with the aid of China, protects so that China can receive its oil supplies or purchases.