Election Officials Telling College Students They Can't Vote
WASHINGTON - Colorado Democrats accused a Republican county clerk Wednesday of falsely informing Colorado College that students from outside the state could not register to vote if their parents claimed them as a dependent on their tax returns.
At a news conference in Colorado Springs, Democrats also criticized Robert Balink, the El Paso County clerk and recorder, who was a delegate to the Republican National Convention, for taking other steps they said would dampen voting by college students, who are expected to heavily favor Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.
"When election officials spread false information about who is eligible to vote and remove, not add, polling places, we need to be concerned that eligible voters will be denied their right to vote," said Pat Waak, chairwoman of the Colorado Democratic Party.
Balink issued a statement saying his office had misinterpreted state law and "mistakenly published information that was incorrect."
Balink's actions are the latest of several instances in which local election officials, including some in Virginia and South Carolina, have discouraged college students from voting in a year in which legions of students have thrown their energy behind Obama.
Discovery of these restrictions comes as Democrats have increasingly accused Republicans of using an array of tactics to suppress the Democratic voter turnout in the November election.
Liz Olson, the elections manager in Colorado's El Paso County, said that the office "takes full responsibility for what's in that document. Nobody told us to put anything in there."
Martha Tierney, an attorney for the Colorado Democratic Party, said she obtained emails showing that Balink's office sent a misleading flier to the Colorado College president's office to provide students with voter-registration information and urged its circulation on campus.
The flier stated: "What this means is that if your parents still claim you on their income tax returns, and they file that return in a state other than Colorado, you are not eligible to register to vote or vote in Colorado."
Voter residency requirements vary from state to state, but must meet the guarantees of the U.S. Constitution, said Jon Greenbaum, a voting rights expert with the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Greenbaum said that what states and counties can't do is adopt rules that treat one group of voters differently than others.
Greenbaum noted that Virginia's elections board recently revised language on its Internet site that discouraged students from registering after reports of a similar episode at Virginia Tech, in Blacksburg, Va. The New York Times reported Sept. 8 that a local registrar had issued two releases that incorrectly suggested dire consequences for the university's students who registered to vote there, including the possibility they no longer could be claimed as dependents on their parents' tax returns.
Sujatha Jahagirdar, program director of the Student Public Interest Research Group's New Voters Project in Washington, said she encountered similar problems when she posed as a college freshman last week and called registrar's offices in Greenville County, S.C., home to Furman University, and York County, S.C., where Winthrop University is located.
Jahagirdar said a Greenville official asked if her parents listed her as a dependent, and when she replied in the affirmative, told her: "You should vote where your parents live." She said a York County representative asked if she was in town for school, and when she said yes, stated flatly: "You can't vote here."
A caller on Wednesday got similar responses.
Told of the information imparted by his staff, Conway Belangia, Greenville County's director of registration and elections, said that "if a staff person made a statement like that, it was an error."
A York County official didn't respond to calls for comment.
Belangia said, however, that if a student lives in a dormitory, he must respond to a series of questions laid out in a 1974 federal court order covering voting registration in the county. He said students must demonstrate their "intent to claim this locale as their home when they finish school."
Jahagirdar called the counties' policies "intimidating" and said they "send a message that young voters are not welcome in our democracy" just when they're first enjoying the right to vote.
The flap over students' voting rights comes after Democrats last week filed a lawsuit in Michigan, seeking a court order barring Republicans from using lists of people facing mortgage foreclosure proceedings as a basis for challenging their voting eligibility. Michigan Republicans denied using foreclosure lists to cast doubt about voters' qualifications.
And in Ohio, a pivotal state that was mired in allegations of voting irregularities in the 2004 presidential election, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner on Wednesday advised county election boards that foreclosure lists should not be considered proof that voters have changed residences.
"Ohioans faced with the pain and turmoil of a home foreclosure should not be targeted by the forces of disenfranchisement on Election Day," Brunner said.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
18 Comments so far
Show AllJust goes to show how much respect the republican party has for the idea of democracy. Anyone with any type of ability to research knows that the past two presidential elections have been won by the candidate whose party aggressively denied votes to thousands of Americans. It wasn't about who voted but who wasn't allowed to vote. This time there's just too many votes to disallow for the republi-fascists to win.
It is probably too late to change voting rules for this election cycle. Students who want to cast a ballot ought to register in their home district (where their parents reside) and pull a mail-in absentee ballot. Then, they can vote early and on a ballot guaranteed to be a paper trail. Why risk having their vote not counted and/or rejected? Then, work from now to have the rules for voting in CO, or wherever, changed for the next election.
i am encouraged by the neocons behaviors, because i believe most college students have enough brains and self-respect to rip new ones on the crazies come election day.
progressiveparty wrote:
If we got rid of the electoral college this certainly wouldn't matter on the presidential level. Republicans willingness to do whatever they need to do criminally to win is totally disgusting! I'm not an Obama supporter but it is clear that he would win without these shennanigans.
_______________________________________________
The electoral college has become a sham. It was originally intended to give equal voting power to those states with fewer citizens, but it has since been bastardized by the fact that questionable and immoral electoral delegates can cast their votes for any candidate they like instead of being required to cast their vote as the majority of citizens have directed them to do. It is an archaic system that demands revision, if not erasure.
Sadly, progressiveparty is also very correct in his/her assessment that the Republicans are most willing to do whatever is necessary for their candidates to win, whether it is legal or not.
The tricks are endless. On the day before Election Day, all newly registered Democrats, many who don't know exactly how voting is done, get a phone call from "the elections board" (not) telling them that they are expecting a very high turnout, so Democrats will now be voting the day after Election Day. Or that the voting hours have been extended to 10:00 p.m. Or they ask the Democrat to simply tell the caller how they plan to vote, and that would suffice as their vote -- no need to drive down to the polling place. I live in the Great Republican State of Florida, where there are many gullible, trusting Democrats. The system is based on good faith, because there's no way to police this sort of thing.
The only democratic voting system is one that sees ALL of the people voting.In Australia it is compulsory to vote, every single eligible voter over the age of 18yrs. What is more you can vote for your own electorate no matter where you are, even overseas.In the U S A you are lucky to have half the voters. and often elect a President or member with less than a quarter of the people voting for them.
Further our voting day is 7 am to 7 pm on a Saturday to ensure the greatest number of people attend without employment inconvenience. It is a secret vote (supervised by Party reps, hand counted) and the votes all counted preferentially.(Chose one and your next preference.) Five candidates? No problem the bottom one's preferences are allocated to the next until the final two. Now the only improvement would be to have proportional representation. Can't see it happening as this would let in a few minorities at the expense of the controlling major parties,
tomedgar@halenet.com.au
Put these election officials in the town stocks.
What part of FASCIST NATION don't you understand ?????
"Balink issued a statement saying his office had misinterpreted state law and "mistakenly published information that was incorrect.""
I'm sure they'll have it all worked out by November 3rd.
What I find interesting is that there appear to be no consequences for this illegal behavior, just that it is incorrect and please disregard it. Which may or may not be adequately disseminated. Are election officials getting a free pass for not knowing the rules, or for deliberately lying to change the outcome of the election? And why is it the only rules they seem to be confused about always favor Republicans?
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
"Balink issued a statement saying his office had misinterpreted state law and "mistakenly published information that was incorrect."
No consequences? That was my thought, too. Do they not have legal counsel regarding such matters, or is it left up to those in charge to determine what will or will not be published?
Fortunately, this was caught before a vote was cast. However, that doesn't mean that steps shouldn't be taken. Considering that Mr. Balink was a delegate to the RNC, there is just a whiff of partisanship here. Measures should be put in place to ensure that this kind of thing doesn't happen again.
"Bailiff, whack his peepee!"
We need direct elections. One person, one vote. There is no reason that a 51% to 49% vote should be winner take all.
Joe
If we got rid of the electoral college this certainly wouldn't matter on the presidential level. Republicans willingness to do whatever they need to do criminally to win is totally disgusting! I'm not an Obama supporter but it is clear that he would win without these shennanigans.
So why are the Democrats not interested in reforming the election system; proportional voting, elimination of the electoral college, public financing, fair access to the media, impartial election officials, etc.? Could it be that they like the current corrupt system just as much as the Republicans?
But why do the majority of Americans go along with it when they could vote for people who have sworn for years to change it if only they got the chance? In other words: why do Americans like corruption? They even send money to the people who are committing the voter disenfranchising dirty tricks. How funny is that? Are they mad at the criminality or just mad that the other gang is more adept at it?
One person - One vote - suppressing that is a crime - just march the criminals of to prison - what is so complicated about that? - Deny others their rights - get yours taken away - or is that too simple for the law makers and the enforcers - refusal to arrest is complicity! The idea that thieves are somehow "privileged" just doesn't pass any smell test!
Evil has only one tool - that is the disruption of peace - it is applied in infinite ways but it is always the same tool - JC
I was at a College Democrats meeting last night, and our guest speaker was telling us about how the Republicans suppressed college student voting in Pennsylvania and Ohio in 2004 and stole the election that way. Weeks before the elections, people went to the campuses with petitions calling for the legalization of marijuana. Instead, what the petitions did was change the person's address and party registration. Then when they came to the polls on election day, teams of Republican lawyers challenged each and every ballot cast by the college students, since they knew their names would not be on the voting rolls. Nice, huh?
Yet another Republican power-play...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/2973827/Republicans-move-to-deny-homeless-vo...
First the mortgage crisis disenfranchised... now uninformed college students? I wonder, when do they plan on repealing the Fifteeenth and Nineteenth Amendments?
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak; and that it is doing God's service when it is violating all his laws."
-- John Quincy Adams
Republican Troll
You're supposed to be shouting about honest errors and the need to prevent fraud by voters who might vote more than once.
Didn't you get the memo? :-)