Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Wall Street Mega Bailout: Bad News for the World's Hungry
Rising food prices are proving deadly for the world's poor. Reeling under a combination of speculation, high oil prices, agrofuels and a weak dollar, one in every six people on earth are going hungry this year. Fully half the world is now at risk of hunger and malnutrition. The current financial crisis that threatens to spread globally can only mean disaster for the world's poor. The crisis is not limited to the developing world. In the United States food stamp enrollment is at an all time high. The 35 million people living below the poverty line-now joined by the 50 million near-poor are turning to the nation's food banks in record numbers. There, pickings are getting slimmer, as food programs strain under a combination of high food prices and shrinking donations.
Unfortunately, the unprecedented $700 billion Wall Street bailout will do nothing to alleviate this festering disaster-in fact, it may make things worse. How? The bailout will increase the U.S.'s national debt to over $11 trillion, calling into question the very creditworthiness of the U.S. Treasury. Debt and uncertainty will further drive down the value of the dollar. A weak dollar means high food prices to consumers because when the dollar decreases in value it takes more dollars to buy the same quantity of food. Though a low dollar might initially stimulate exports, a falling dollar will send food prices steadily upwards. Food prices have already increased 127% since the dollar began to lose value in 2001. The conservative CATO Institute estimates that up to 55% of this year's increase in rice prices was caused by the falling dollar alone.
If the bailout goes through, the poor will pay for Wall Street's greed with empty bellies. There is no consensus among economists that the bail out will fix the financial crisis. If it fails, we will be hit twice: once with rising costs for basic needs like food, heating and transportation, and again with job losses and less economic opportunity.
The massive cash transfer to Wall Street is likely just the beginning of more taxpayer bloodletting. Regardless, simply granting banks billions in corporate welfare doesn't begin to address the root causes of the food or the financial crises. In the long run, the bail out will do nothing to limit the role of index investors in commodities, nothing to reduce food or finance monopolies, and nothing to stabilize the rising prices of food and fuel currently squeezing poor and working families. A bailout is simply what it sounds like: an emergency measure with no attempt at reform.
The FAO estimates it will take $30 billion a year to eliminate global hunger. For the price of the bailout, we could make sure no one on earth goes hungry for the next 23 years. We could re-build food systems as engines for local economic growth. Instead of exacerbating global hunger, for $700 billion dollars we could fully fund the millennium development goals to eradicate global poverty, the root cause of hunger.
Decades of free market fundamentalism has left food systems around the world in tatters and our financial systems poised on the edge of disaster. Instead of throwing money at a system in crisis, we need to use the crisis as an opportunity to fundamentally restructure both food and finance. We need to re-regulate the financial services industry, re-establish national grain reserves, and use anti-trust legislation to break up the power of the oligopolies holding us hostage. Instead of considering a $700 billion dollar gift to financiers, Congress needs to jettison the laissez-faire policies that let Wall Street spin out of control in the first place.
- Posted in





47 Comments so far
Show AllI thought this was a very good article except for the suggestion that we were somehow responsible for solving world hunger and poverty.
While we are not solely responsible, we do have to own up to being only 4% of the world's population yet use more than 25% of the world's resources, including food. Our food policies need to be changed to help more people with nutritious healthy food.
If you are replying to me, you must not have read my entire post.
There are also poor people in this country that do not consume very much of it at all. But, I think you already alluded to that.
Wouldn't disagree with that, The farcial boodoggle of corn biofuels would be a good start.
As to the 25%, most of the world is not industrialized as we are. There always have been and always will be inequities in the wealth of the world. Fortunately for the world we have been in charge recently, if you check the record you'll find there has been no other nation in history near as generous or helpful to the rest of the world.
If neo-liberal and CIA takeovers of their govts is "helpful"--please stop helping!!
BTW, I think we cashed in the "industrial revolution" a lomg time ago. That "award" (cough, cough) would go elsewhere now.
If AIDS help includes "abstinence only education", given the young age of most of the pop. infected, it is doomed to fail.
If the jokers now in charge have anything to say about it we may not have any industry when this is over. We do still produce a lot of things.
What do we produce, that is not outsourced?
It sesms that all we can sell anymore is implements of war.
We are great dealers in bad debt, turns out, for one thing.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_com_to_for_aid-economy-commitment-to-foreign-aid
Check out this link. Denmark is first with 52%, US is at 3%.
It is a commonly believed fiction.
As a percentage of what? Also that is Foreign Aid, doesn't include many other things.
I% of our GDP might equal 99% of Denmarks. Numbers can fool you sometimes.
I truly don't believe the world would want to depend on Denmark for help in an emergency instead of us, do you?
They already do. Did you even go to the link? Or doesnt it work? (I'm not incredibly good at this stuff, plus my pc is old as the hills)
Sure I did, but there was no information on how they arrived at their percentages that I saw. Maybe I just missed it, but I don't think so.
The US contribution to world progress has now becomes such a mixed bag full of such destructive elements that we have to start applying the Hippocratic Oath to "do no harm". The good simply no longer compensates for the bad. The world is better off with ZERO contribution from the USA until the USA learns to apply the Hippocratic Oath.
I understand what you are saying, but if America just stopped its charitable contributions, foreign aid, disaster help, you'd hear a real howl from the rest of the world.
Perhaps ya'll are only thinking of government help?
Ah, yeah. When one is looking at it , country by country, it would be impossible to estimate how much suckers give to tv ministers, churches, all kinds of charities. Their lifeblood is to make sure that there is constant need.
Yes indeed, the USA is responsible for world hunger in 2008. Whos idea was it forty years ago to channel millions of barrels of petroleum into the "green revolution" mega-racket to "feed the world"? This petro-dependence became a key justification for a subsequent gargantuan US military buildup, did it not?
We were going to feed the world (or more accurately use that as a pretext to achieve greater economic dominance/control). So we took control of middle east petroleum production, we took military control of as much of the world as possible, so that we could in turn "feed the world" among other things. So after elbowing our way around this planet to secure markets for our petro-fired frankengrains, pushing millions of Mexicans out of their millennia-old food production traditions, forcing them into economic refugeedom, we have the responsibility, whether we like it or not, to deal with the current worldwide food crisis, largely a result of our relentless "green revolution" lobbying worldwide past forty years.
Of couse the world is far better off feeding itself, but it remains that our actions have consequences, so US progressives should hammer down on Washington to allocate $700 billion to support local land, water, food independence worldwide, to compensate its "green revolution" criminal act to destroy local land, water, food independence worldwide past forty years.
This has already been happening, and, will only get worse.
In the US, some of the problem was the "stock mkts" big grab for middle class cash and equity. (If we properly funded pensions and SS, we wuoldnt need thsee IRAs and 401ks) No money , no power.
Biden said, in the debate lst night, that we would "probaly have to cut foreign aid in half". It wil be more than that, and , the GOP is trying to gut the treasury , so that no social programs wil be able to be enacted in a new administration . (Actually, its will be used a an excuse not ot--because neither candidate was really going to do much with that anyway).
The "global marketplace" (run by mult-natls.) is a killer.Throwing large populatins of formerly agrarian populations into "multi-natl, free-mkt. capitalism", is a 'shock doctrine" and doomed to failure. Capitalism is NOT a system of govt. and it does NOT "lead to democracy". The Chicago/Friedman Boys tried it all over the Southern Cone of Latin Am. with disastrous resutls. I applaud the people of Venezuela, Bolivia, etc. , for finally freeing themselves of the multi-natl grip, who were actually trying to privitize WATER!
We need to get tthe CIA out of there, stop chasing people around for drugs (why does US use so many drugs?? No one ever asks that), stop letting multi-natls seize family lands, etc. It is a disgrace and the corp should be very ashamed.
If we are to give aid, we need to not attach strings to it, like "capitalize your economy and we'll give you a loan". The World Bank and IMF, should both be disabanded and replaced with institutions whose sole fucntion is to help the poor of the world. For now, they are just a front for what?--big, multi-natl corps.
Capitalism kills.
To add one more thing, we need to not subsidize bio-fuels, It is creating higher food prices.
To Thomas, below, I agree that the US is not responsible, by itself, for defeating world hunger (esp. now that we are broke). But, the advanced countries have a huge stake in how these starving people decide to escape from their hell. If we wish to remain part of teh G8, etc, ,we are saying that we have a responsibility, along with other rich nations , to do something to alleviate misery. In our own coutnry and abroad.
Alot of people think that we give the most aid of any coutnry. We 'give" alot, but it is with strings--sometimes justified, mostly not. Actually, other countries give more. China is starting to do the same thing thing, in S. Africa, etc. Some say that their influence willl be good, some say no.The WB, UN, etc, need to get together to decide how to provide a more equal districutiosn of trhe world's resources, or , I can guarantee you--we are screwed--after a few miillion other people.
Our fortunes rise and fall together, you know. I am agnostic, but, I truly believe that, what you do, comes back to --someone. That's the problem. The people who start these damn wars and messes, usually do not pay the price.
Every time we decide that military spending is what is important, killing people in country after country, we are not only killing people in those countries, but we are saying "f you" to poor people everywhere. We need to re-prioritize, vote for other than Dem or Repubs, and STOP justifying lesser evilist voting that makes us complicit in the death sentences for so many poor people. We need to join with the whole world and make nutritious healthy food policies for all a top priority.
we spend 4% of GDP on military spending. 4 to 5% have been the normal range since WWII.
http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/tying_spending_to_gdp_bad_policy/
Also, if you look at it as "what % of discretionary spending", it is the highest in the world.
It is a matter of opinion as to whether it should be.
Is this really Lou Dobbs?
http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Military-budget-of-the-United-States
The US spends 14 x more thaN the rest of the world combined.
I think that $850 billion dollars will build millions of houses from scratch - thereby solving America's homeless and unemployment problem at a stroke. This Congressional Bailout is only giving the Corporate Gamblers another stack of chips from the taxpayers savings. Is there anything in this bill about letting Grandma Millie sleep in her car or the homeless camp under bridges? No? This is October and the United States Army is unconstitutionally deploying in america to prevent these problems. With bayonets and bullets.
Just goes to show that when you elect rich conservatives like Bush, McCain, all Republicans and some Democrats, you get socialized bailouts for rich criminals, neocons and other fascists.
And when you elect poor people like Chavez, Evo, Kucinich and Obama you are likely to get democracy, at least until they sell out or get taken out.
Mammon rules until we have direct democracy.
I wish that we could elect a president here, that was as concerned about his people as Morales and Chavez. But, the US not only does not congratulate these people, we put them om a "terrorist" list!! Or they try. (When W said he woudl put Chavez on it--he replied, "I dare you")
Chavez can be full of --well, Chavez. And lots of melodrama. But his nationalizing of the big oil cos. and other resources, has finally put the poor in a position to reap some of the benefits. The multi-natls. that dont like it, should go to hell.
Uribe of Colombia, is a Bush lapdog. He was here pushing the Colombia "free trade agtreement" last month. It will not help the people of Colombia, nor of the US. It is for the big corp. only. The neo-liberal (and neo-con) push for globalization is merciless and self-serving.
How about some FAIR trade for a change. And we cannot have that in Latin Am,. as long as we keep trying to asssassinate their leaders.
Obama?? I just caught that , at the end! Obama is a multi-millionaire, my friend. He lives in a $2 million house. His wife was making $950,000 a year when he started to run for president. This crap about food stamps and student loans is just that--crap.
Kucinuich is not poor either (I think his portfolio is about $600,000), but, it is significantly smaller than the basterds voting to give Wal Stl the middle classes money, as se speak.
I make it a point to know, because it is so easy to predict their votes on certain schemes, once you follow the money.
Obama is very rich, by median income standards.
Let me put it this way, Obama was poor when he first got into office. By Bush/McCain standards, he is a pauper:
Salon.com: Presidential Candidates’ Net Worth
(h/t Salon.com and Money magazine who provide the net worth calculations)
Candidate
Net Worth
Mitt and Ann Romney $202 million
John and Elizabeth Edwards $54.7 million
Rudy Giuliani $52.2 million
John and Cindy McCain $40.4 million
Hillary and Bill Clinton $34.9 million
4/4/08 Update: The Clintons released their tax returns showing that they had earned $109 million since they left the White House.
Fred Thompson $8.1 million
Barack and Michelle Obama $1.3 million
http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/saloncom-presidential-candidates-net-worth/
They bought a manison at a loss, for $1.9 million. I just dont see how that can be.
I got the stats from Mother Jones.
In any case, they are a helluva alot richer than the middle class. If you want policies for the poor, take the damn lobbying money out of the process.
Maybe you should have said that Obama was a pauper , relatively speaking!
That comforts me, not at all.
He has raised more private money from Wal St. than any candiate in the history of the world. Think whar that money couldve done.
Comparing Obama to Chavez and Morales is a real insult to them.
And, you are aware tha Obama just voted for the bailout, are you not???
So, vote dfor "lesser millionaires" and get--what??
I'd wait a bit before I got too excited about Chavez and Morales. You may find they aren't as concerned about their poor as you believe.
Why do the poor keep electing them then?
Do you have any evidecne of this, or , are you jusr Nostradumbaass.
The voting is legal (more than wew can say here)--we know, because a vote to allow hi another ternm failed for Chavez. H accepted it.
So, what do YOU think that they are concerned about?
I've been there once last year and early this year helping with bridges that won't wash out in the rural areas. What I saw wouldn't lead me to believe that the poor are getting any help. Their young men are pressed into the army, believe me you wouldn't want to face those soldiers in the area. They are getting nothing, no help to speak of and set prices for their crops.
I think its pretty much like any other tin pot dictatorship I've seen in South America. As far as the poor voying for him...check out the ward politics in New York, Chicago...of course they vote for him.
I do not say I couldn't be wrong, its just my opinion. But I won't go again.
Well, I'd have to hear from someone from Venezuela to buy akll that.
Why did you go? Tourism? Cause I've found that , if you travel, (and, I havent, for way too long), and just go to tourist places, you will not see what is raelly going on.
I just cannot imagine that Latin America was better off with Am. appointed dictators, funneling them into multi-antl corporatism. If they are stil in a bad way, maybe we should open up trade with them (FAIR trade). We will not, because Bush the Terrorist, thinks that anyone who opposes private ownership of virtually everything, is a "terrorist". Then, our capitalist presidents have them assassinated, if they can.
The Latin Cone had the highest numbers (per capita) of middle class standards of any country of our hemisphere. The globalists just saw them as a mkt, ripe for the pickcing. Enron tried to privitiaze theri water. I coud go on asnd on. Try "The Shock Doctrine".
You know, it is hard to believe that the people of Latin Am. just "hate the US" just for the hell of it. And, how are the poor doing here? Or is it impossible for the census to keep up with the growing numbers.
I see--you went to build bridges. OK. And you honestly think that the people of Venezuela were better off with global capitalism? And that, their leaders are much worse than ours.
With capitalism? Yes. Not global capitalism, but capitalism.
I think their leaders are as bad as ours and worse in other ways. But ours are nothing to write home about!
I would disagree. But, then, I am pretty fricking poor, so life under capitalism (moneyism) for me, may be quite different than it is for you.
I think that, in a country that has had it's resources stipped, where there are many more poor than middle clas (wasnt that way before the Chicago Boys), capitalism is a disaster.
Capitalism allows things like contractors. Things like the highest prices for health care in the world. Soaring prices for food, (not for shelter!@!), transportation.
Unless you are a Type A Alpha, you wil not "get ahead" in a capitalistic society (they are NOT always the "best" people). If you are injured or fall behind--gawd help you!! The greedy capitalists wil just run right over you.
And, it is not best for the monied, in the end. Do you realize how much money you could save, if people who are staying broke and not working, to be able to keep measly health care , could train or go back to work? I have a Master's degree. If I earn a single penny--no more Medicaid. This was not my "plan".
"Born down in a dead man's town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
Wound up like a dog that's been beat too much
Til you spend half your life just covering up"
I (barely) have a house now. So, I am lucky.It is a dump--but I'm not in a tent.
So, what would you advise those in tents (New Orleans and Texas) with norunning water to drink or clean up, nofood--to go apply for a jov at McDonald's?? Have you ever slept in a park and tried to get up for a job interview?
I dont think that people liek you dont care. I just think youhave no idea hw bad it is realy getting.,
that 700b could have been used to pay down the national debt!!!!
The US is number 18 in foreign aid. Denmark is first. (I wish my dad had stayed there!)
Check out the stats. Some of the richest people in the world live here. It is digusting.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_com_to_for_aid-economy-commitment-to-foreign-aid
the american fascist genocide of the wold seems to be going quite nicely
thanks for the bailout chumps
cheers, b
Response from Wall Street:
F**k the world's hungry. What have they done for my stock portfolio lately? F**king whiners.
You don't like it? What are you gonna do - stand in front of my skyscraper with a sign for a couple of hours? You gonna call your Congressional "representative," the one me and my friends have been slipping a few million a year? Go ahead, here's his number: 1-888-EAT-SHIT. Tell 'em the cartel sends their best.
And may God continue to bless America,
Wall Street
The sociologists Bush and Cheney from AEI (America Eats Itself) have published a book entitled "So?", published by Wansee Press. The thesis is that if you eliminate tens of millions of undeserving and inferior mouths through "market" created famines, the food supply to the United States will become more stable. Food is basic; the suckers must be fed so they can be happy in their low paying, non-union work and won't consider insurrection when they wake up one morning to find themselves serfs living in human Skinner Boxes and getting powerful electric shocks up the backside if they slow down the pace of their work.
The Mammon Master’s Intervention
Save the tycoons
Intervene before they jump
We would be leaderless it they took the plunge
Don’t let them sweat over a little toxic debt
ain’t you never been over your head from a little bet?
Save the tycoons
We need the gilded dreams of the well to do
A little intervention and you will be gold plated too
just a few steps away from gated nests and private jets
for their dream is your dream too
Save the tycoons
save the mammon masters
for bottom feeding is never free
so please consume the cancer of their little splurge
roll over it’s time for another little purge
Until more Americans and Europeans are forced to live in the same depressed environment as the uber-poor elsewhere on this planet, Wall Street can still count on suckers to gamble. A true pro-lifer would not put excess greed for cash first.
how misinformed. dont you read the papers?
the dollar is strong as hell, and food prices are falling rapidly (as are oil and gas and copper and other industrial commodities). this is called deflation, folks.
what planet are you living on?
Ah, can you give me some stats on that? The dollar is "strong"??
What planet are you on? Planet Paul-tard??
The FAO estimates it will take $30 billion a year to eliminate global hunger. For the price of the bailout, we could make sure no one on earth goes hungry for the next 23 years.
Geez, where is it written that the US of A is responsible for feeding the world? I was not aware that this (albeit noble) enterprise was exclusively our provision.
Geez, I dont know.Cause, maybe , they are, like, your fellow human beings, and, like we waste more money on JUNK in the US than anywhere else on earth, with China closing in?
Do you think it might improve our world image, and, make us feel safer,. if the whole world didnt have to watch the US making other countries "free" (for global marketplace investment)and attaching strings to everything we "give".You know, like, if you think altruism is a wasted emotion.
If you prefer isolationism, then you have to take on the prospect pointed out above; that many peopel right here are hungry in the land of the "free".
Or, dont you feel any responsibility towards your own countrymen either?
The New Bum Deal
Bring back the guillotines
Love you people, if some more than others. The sun is setting at 7:30 and seems to have swung about 3 degrees south from yesterday. I feel the arc of winter coming on. The alternator went out in my 85 Ford LTD late yesterday so I couldn't get to work today. Ended up spending half the day reading CD. The car made it to the local repair shop. We have no auto parts store here. Normally I would do my own repair---replacing an alternator on an old Ford is fairly routine.
Poverty and food... There actually are people in the next county south of me in SE Indiana still living in log cabins, albeit with FDR electricity, in the rural hills, still growing their own veggies. Years ago when I lived in Bloomington, IN, I used to drive around the countryside in Monroe County and noticed the anonymity of rural poverty in America. It reminded me of Robert F Kennedy discovering West Virginia shortly before he was assassinated by an anonymous Terrorist. (By now if you ask me who killed RFK versus who killed John Lennon...! Does it really matter? They were Manchurian assassins.)
In the county immediately west of mine, where there still exists a certain level of industry but where a Ford parts plant just closed down eliminating a few thousand jobs, the rural poverty is just as bad as south of here. The garbage piles up in the yards because people cannot afford Rumpke collection. Old cars and other machines litter the lots for the sake of redundancy, each lot being its own junkyard of spare parts. The roads and driveways are gravel. The schools are failing and the libraries can't keep up.
Most of the women are overweight and there is no real healthcare. In Middle America you are on your own. Diabetes flourishes. The kids will die younger than we will.
We have been betrayed by our "leaders." When was the last time you read of Cindy Sheehan running against Nancy "Impeachment is off the table" Pelosi in San Francisco? October 3, 2008, the day the House passed the Senate's trillion-dollar BAILOUT of the rich and Dubya signed it as quickly as he possibly could, will go down in history as the Treaty of Capitulation. Democracy is now officially dead. The PEOPLE SPOKE and the House ignored their Voice. The Nazi Terrorist in the White House has won. Does McCain need a SECOND "October Surprise"? Like Israel bombing Iran?
We are living in a time of imposed FEAR, a government-induced collective irrationality. "These are the Times that try men's souls." Today, FDR would be wrong: We have more to fear than fear itself. We have our government to fear.
-30-