EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Jobless Millions Signal Death of the American Dream for Many
Richard Gaines is one of the best-known faces on Camden's Haddon Avenue. It is a rough-and-tumble street, lined with cheap businesses and boarded-up houses, and is prey to drug gangs. Gaines, 50, runs a barbershop, a hair salon and a fitness business. He works hard and is committed to his community. But Haddon Avenue is not an easy place to make a living in the best of times. And these are far from the best of times.
Union members hold up "I want to work" placards as they join a protest of several thousand people demanding jobs outside City Hall in Los Angeles on August 13, 2010. (Photograph: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images) Just how badly the great recession has struck this fragile
New Jersey city, which is currently the poorest in America, was recently
spelled out to Gaines. In happier times – whatever that might mean for a
city as destitute as Camden – local businesses on Haddon Avenue could
at least rely on a bit of trade from those who made their money on the
street.
Young men bought flashy clothes and got sharp haircuts and always paid in cash. But no longer. The economy is now so bad in Camden that even the criminals are struggling and going short. "Even the guys who got money from illegal means really don't want to spend it," Gaines said.
Such a development, though, is just a snapshot of the deep problems still hitting the wider American economy. Growth rates are stuttering and a recovery is struggling to take hold. It may even now be showing signs of going backwards again, as countries such as Germany start to power forward. Joblessness has taken hold in America, with the numbers of long-term unemployed reaching levels not seen since the Depression of the 1930s. The figures are frightening and illustrate a society that remains in deep trouble.
The headline jobless figure of 9.5% is bad enough but does not begin to convey the problem as it fails to measure those who have stopped looking for work. Over the past three months alone more than a million Americans have fallen into that category: effectively giving up hope of finding a job and dropping out of the official statistics. Such cases now number some 5.9 million and their ranks are likely to grow as millions more find their jobless status becoming a permanent state of hopelessness. Surveys show that with each passing week on the dole their chances of finding a job get slimmer.
Though corporations, especially in the banking sector, are posting healthy profits, they are not hiring new workers. At the same time, government cuts are sweeping through city and state governments alike, threatening tens of thousands of jobs and slicing away at services once thought vital. Schools, street lighting, libraries, refuse collection, the police, fire services and public transport networks are all being scaled back.
America appears to be a society splitting down the centre, shattering the middle class that long formed the cultural bedrock of the country and dividing it into a country of haves and have-nots. "A once unthinkable level of economic distress is in the process of becoming the new normal," warned Nobel-prize winning economist Paul Krugman in a recent New York Times column. Or, as Steven Green, an economics lecturer at Baylor University, put it to the Observer: "We are really in a tough spot right now."
There is a new name for those falling down the black hole of joblessness that has opened up in America's economy. They are the 99ers.
It is a moniker that no one wants. It refers to the 99 weeks of benefits that the jobless can qualify for in America. Government cash helps those laid off keep a tenuous grip on a normal life. It keeps a roof over their heads, pays a phone bill, puts food on a table and petrol in a car. But once the 99 weeks are up the payments stop – as is happening now for millions of people – and they are 99ers.
For many, that moment, which America's politicians have refused to extend, represents the moment of destitution; a sort of modern American version of the old Victorian trip to the workhouse. There are now more than a million 99ers and the number gets bigger each week.
But who are they? Despite Republican attempts to paint them as feckless or job-shy, they are usually anything but. The 99ers are people like Anne Strauss, 58, who spent 35 years working as a PR professional on Long Island. Despite spending every day hunting for work, she has not had a job since June 2008. She and her husband are now living on credit cards watching debts mount as they stare into the abyss. "Looking for a job is the hardest I have ever worked," she said with a smile that conveyed no humour or happiness, only the deep stress that is common to many 99ers.
Strauss, along with about 50 other 99ers, protested on Wall Street last week, demanding an extension of the benefits that could keep them out of poverty. As bankers and financiers strode into the flag-draped Stock Exchange they chanted: "Shame! Shame!" and told their stories. It was a litany of middle-class lives shattered by the recession. There was Connie Kaplan, a corporate librarian who was desperate to resume her career. "We are not bums, we are hardworking," she said. Or Lori Ghavami, a New Jersey financial analyst in her 30s, who had once worked on Wall Street itself and now was staring at landlords' bills she was scared she could not pay. Or New Yorker Steven Bilarbi, 62, who had worked for the same employer for 37 years, until 2007. He has not worked since, despite refusing to spend daytime hours at home and engaging in a permanent job hunt. He is now living off savings and depleting his pension.
"I go to job fairs. I don't feel like staying home. What would I do? Watch game shows and soap operas?" he fumed.
Meeting 99ers is to tap into a deep well of anger at lives that have been knocked off course, shattering the enduring vision of the American dream that many had felt they had achieved. Just take Donna Faiella, a 53-year-old New Yorker who lives alone in Queens. She spent 28 years working in film post-production and video-editing. She was successful and had a career. Now she is desperate for a job, any job. But she cannot find one. "I will do anything. I will sweep floors. You think I look forward to collecting unemployment? It is fucking degrading," she said, almost quivering with anger.
Faiella is in dire trouble. Joblessness has eaten away at her sense of identity. "I feel like we are worthless. We are lost in the world. I don't know what to call myself. I don't have a title any more. What do we do? What do we do?" she implored. Faiella has one week of benefits to go. Then her 99 weeks will be up. She will have a title again. But not one she expected. She will be a 99er. "I am petrified. Do I become homeless?" she said, adding that she has begun making inquiries at local shelters.
If the 99ers are coming to symbolise a human segment of society that America is slowly abandoning to its fate, then Camden is the geographic expression of that marginalisation. Large stretches of the once bustling river port city seem to epitomise urban blight. Vacant lots and burned-out abandoned houses line many of its streets.
Its 79,000 residents have the lowest median household annual income of any city in the US at just $24,000 (£15,000). In terms of crime rates it was the nation's second-most dangerous city last year. Some estimates reckon that about a third of Camden's houses are empty. A third of its people are in poverty and a fifth are unemployed.
It is a deeply grim picture and it is getting worse. Camden's city government is facing the prospect of massive cuts as its cash-strapped resources have run out and it has built up huge debts. Services have already been cut and only a last-minute rescue last week saved Camden's three public libraries from being closed.
In a city that has had it tough for decades these are hammer blows to its residents. One woman who has watched in dismay as the recession unfolded outside her door is Dorothy Allen, 81, who has lived near Haddon Avenue for almost four decades. Known by almost everyone as "Mom", she calls herself "the mother of the block". She has never known anything like the area's current troubles. "I have been here since 1971 and it's the worst it's ever been," she said. Yet to listen to America's politicians many would think recovery is just a matter of time. Yes, they say, the recession has been hard, but America will pull through and everything will be as it once was. Last week New Jersey senator Robert Menendez visited Camden, stopping at a local health clinic. He spoke of the achievements of the Democrats in staving off economic disaster.
Job creation was coming, he told his audience of health executives: "It is not going fast enough to get people back to work but it's a dramatic turnaround." It does not feel that way for millions of Americans all across the country. Camden is far from unique in slashing its services. In Colorado Springs more than a third of street lights have been switched off to cut the municipal electricity bill. The city has also sold off its police helicopters.
In Hawaii schoolchildren were told to stay at home for 17 Fridays to save costs. In a suburb of Atlanta local bus routes were closed, at a stroke wiping out public transport for thousands of people who relied on it to get to precious jobs.
Whether it's the poor of Camden or Colorado Springs or Atlanta, or among the growing throngs of the 99ers, millions of Americans are discovering that working hard, doing the right thing and obeying the rules are no longer enough.
Back at the 99er rally on Wall Street, Anne Strauss felt that way. During her working life she had refused to claim benefits to which she was entitled as she thought she was doing just fine. Now, as a newly minted 99er, she was looking for help from the country that she had always believed in. But the help was not forthcoming. It is hard to see how the version of the American dream that Menendez described could now ever apply to her. For Strauss, living on credit, desperate to work, but with no job in sight, that dream looks a thing of the past, not the future. "This is not the country I grew up in," Strauss said.
Case study: 'This is my last $260 and barring a miracle I'll be sleeping in my car'
Alexandra Jarrin, 49, worked for a small technology company near New York City, earned $56,000 a year, had petrol in her car and a roof over her head. She was enrolled in a graduate business school. Then, two years ago, she lost her job .
She received her last unemployment payment in March, putting her among the first wave of "99ers" who have come to the end of their 99 weeks of entitlement to benefits. When interviewed by the New York Times, she was living in a motel in Brattleboro, Vermont, having paid $260 she managed to scrape together from friends and from selling her living-room furniture – enough for a week-long stay.
She said she wept as she left her old life. 'I thought, you know, what if I turned the wheel in my car and wrecked my car?' Her vehicle is now on the verge of being repossessed. Jarrin has contacted her local shelter, but was told there was a waiting list. "Barring a miracle, I'm going to be [sleeping] in my car," she said.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



165 Comments so far
Show AllSocialism is looking better and better. Now, this socialism must be eco-socialism so as to also address the ecological imperative, climate deniers notwithstanding.
Socialism, unlike capitalism, rests upon an ethical basis. In simple terms, socialism says that humanity will make progress as a whole--not just elites--or it will not make progress at all. It also takes a positive view of human nature: people will work to better themselves; left alone, they will not loaf and take advantage of the system. Almost all people wish to make a contribution to the community and do not have to be compelled through the suffering of penury to make that contribution. Conservatives take the view that everyone will just goof off, stay home, drink beer and have sex with each other given the freedom to do so. That is why they won't support social programs like mandated vacations, healthcare for all, time off after childbirth, shorter work hours, and the like.
The eco-socialism you talk about recognizes the importance of taking the environment into account when making decisions. People do not have unlimited freedom to do what they want with natural world; they must pay attention not only to other humans but to other species of plants and animals. Predictably, libertarians oppose constraints on their freedom to do whatever they want. They haven't come to terms with questions of resource depletion, pollution, monopolistic practices aimed at controlling resources, or population. The new socialism does take into account the capacity of humans to destroy the Earth through overconsumption and promotes actions that are sustainable in the long run. I don't see how any intelligent person can oppose these principles.
Seen on a T-shirt:
You can be
a Socialist or
an anti-socialist.
Choose one.
Beautifully stated!
"Conservatives take the view that everyone will just goof off, stay home, drink beer and have sex with each other given the freedom to do so."
I believe that a psychologist might suggest this is projection, since the people who hold this view are typically the ones caught with their pants down.
Wonderful comment! thank you.
Eco-socialism would rather place the natural world and all her eco-systems at the pinnacle of considerations and demand that our livelihoods, our "political economies" be predicated on this natural world in recognition that she is our support system. Economy acknowledging the primacy of ecology.
"Any sensible person right now would join an anti-capitalist organization.
-David Harvey
Quoted from RSA Animate's version of Harvey's lecture called "the Crisis of Capitalism"
(about 10 minutes long)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0
For starters Socialism doesn't have to extend to every area of our country. Some industries and some endeavours should be socialist. Things that we consider societal rights shouldn't be for profit. Legislate the insurers out of business. There shouldn't be any profit in suffering. They will piss and moan about jobs and loss of income the same way the slave owning south did. There shouldn't be profit in providing electricity or roads or healthcare. They should be managed and controlled by the state. You want to build a fancy new toaster and sell it at 400% profit and screw your workers go ahead. There is still room for the greedy capitalists to make their hay. Just not in certain areas we will call the "common good". It doesn't have to be either/or
The problem with socialism is that it ends up taking our cars away. Then where do we sleep?
I learned everything I know about politics from commercial media.
Thanks, qat, I really needed a laugh. Aren't the aol and yahoo "news" stories risible too? I mean, the world's burning and they give us dating tips and celebrity gossip. PTL for CD and my fellow travellers here. Like the earlier commenter, it's great to feel not alone. I'm having trouble talking this talk with close friends. Only one gets it. The rest don't even want to go there. Maybe they will when they get as hungry as I, a TEN99er, am. They won't even listen to the cumulative facts about nineoneone, much less that the game's up.
I love you all. Peace.
You're not alone my friend.
Thanks, CSP.
Your friend, Jack
This all started in 1986 when the corps introduced temp workers.
It makes me sick and angry the way the government treats the people. It's nothing new, but for most folks, and I don't know why this is, they don't understand a problem until it becomes happens to them. The lessons that were there for them to take when the problems of job loss, poor health care, lack of a social safety net, etc., were all happening to others,were never learned then.
Reminds me of the words in Tom Paxton's old song: "It's a lesson too late for the learning made of sand, made of sand."
Government?
Ii is "the way the capitalist bosses treat the people", not the government.
The pro-capitalist government policy we have today is a result of the politicians the voters elected. The voters, in turn, are victims of the corporate medias pro-capitalist propaganda syatem. I other words, the government is a victim of the capitalists as much as the people.
And based on your blaming of "government" you may be a victim of that propaganda campaign yourself.
It all started with the reification of the abstract concept of "freedom" to the economic sphere, even though the real operative concept in this realm is "power", and all this "freedom" has done is allow the powerful to accumulate absolute power.
An extremely important distinction, Sabocat. I think we are all victims of this propaganda campaign, it's just a matter of degree.
I am ashamed to live in a country that lets this happen to people like Alexandria. Am I in a minority?
You are not. Thank Clinton/Bush/Pelosi/Reid and Obama for this.
That list is WAY too short!
Yup...
I have been ashamed of America since I was a teenager when several of my neighbors returned from Viet Nam in boxes.
If you are in the minority, then, I, too, am in the minority. I am deeply ashamed! Unfortunately, we are on our own!
The American Dream is dead -- and has been dead for a long time. Otherwise, Flint, Michigan would still be a thriving community.
No. There should be a way for us all to connect, but I don't know what that is. Instead we in the middle and lower classes are being torn apart to prey on each other instead of gathering together.
Fernand Braudel, in one of his books on the old regime in France and Spain, wrote about a society in which the economy of the lower classes (80% of the population) was based on the poor preying on each other.That was in the 17th century, a time of war and prolonged economic contraction. Here, the future looks more and more like Camden.The only 'growth industry' in Camden is making elaborate iron gates for the houses of those with something to protect.
"The only 'growth industry' in Camden is making elaborate iron gates for the houses of those with something to protect."
You don't have to go back to the 17th century, just go to most modern-day Latin American countries. The thing that struck me most when I worked in Venezuela (oil field) in the 1980s was the elaborate heavy-duty iron gates, and thick walls topped with those unsightly grouted-in broken pop-bottle bases, that surrounding any home even approaching middle-class stature. Only the vast numbers of destitute poor in the shantytowns in the flat, hot, scrubland around Maracaibo, or on the steep slopes around Caracas, did not have these security measures.
And believe me, they were needed. Our US/British/Australian carelessness about locking the gate led to burglaries a few times.
I believe the model for what the US will look like in a couple more decades will be Colombia. We probably will even have paramilitary death squads hired by the rich to take care of workers who get funny ideas about organizing a union.
Samalabear: " Instead we in the middle and lower classes are being torn apart to prey on each other instead of gathering together ". That is exactly it! The vast majority of Americans are and have been screwed by the MIC and their sybarite, wealthy elite. The people that are being screwed are: Greens,Libertarians, Democrats, Republicans, Independents and many,many non-voters who are either apathetic or have given up on America's fixed political system that is: for the rich; by the rich; and of the rich. If all these people could just realize this and put there political differences aside, what a powerful coalition that would make! Just think, if the vast number of people just said; we are all Americans being taken advantage of by a small minority and just said the hell with this conservative,liberal ( the false opposition) divide and conquer crap and just said we are all in the same boat, the Titanic, and once we are in the water, it will be too late. Is that an iceberg I see ahead?
We will connect in food lines and at shelters, and there maybe we will realize that our differences were manufactured to keep us at each other while the country was looted. And there, hopefully, we will launch the next American revolution. I don't expect it to play out this way, but there is no way we will get back what has been stolen without taking it back, and we are not ever going to get it back by voting.
But as long as Joe and Joan Middleclass next door are still employed, they won't give a shit about how the clones next door just lost everything. "When the bankers came for my neighbors, I did nothing..."
Your right the working class and the middle class are being torn asunder. The Tea party group will turn it's anger on the poor and the Progressive middle on the rich. Who do u think will back who in this class war? The Tea Party group has the wealthy behind it and it's going to be utilized to keep the rest of us at bay. The Progressive segment will be and is being attacked by both party elites. Last week we witnessed the Obama regime turn it's guns on the left. Why? because , they have to do this to show their loyalty and fealty to the Dark Overlords AKA the Oligarchs that own them.
"The Tea party group will turn it's anger on the poor and the Progressive middle on the rich."
Can you correct this sentence? Is an "on" supposed to be an "of" and is there supposed to be a "not" somewhere?
Your shame is misplaced, tammons. It is not your country. You don't own it and you don't control anything which happens here, including your own life. You are at best a tenant farmer here.
People need to internalize this fact and need to stop saying "we" as in "WE attacked this country for no reason" or "WE have a high level of poverty".
Start substituting "The U.S." for "We", not only in your posts and conversation but in your mind. It is a reflection of reality.
The "money" economy is "spent" i.e. exhausted/played out/bankrupt/obsolete.
We must construct an economy based on real value, which all of us possess. The "money" economy is poisonous, fatally flawed, ruinous, murderous.
We don't need "jobs", we have important, crucial work to do.
We don't need "money", we need clean air and water and all to be fed and safe.
We need to cut out all the middlemen, and renounce and abandon this sclerotic way of life (that has simply outlasted it's historical context). No blame, just a turn to our own fine human intelligence/imagination/creativity/innovation.
Our solutions are already in our midst....lift your head out of politics for a look-see at what the best among us have fashioned, in all fields of human endeavor.
We're a lot closer to getting through this agony than we realize. The news is extraordinarily good heading into the future. We are a deeply gifted species, and given just half a chance good-hearted too.
Forgiveness of debt, general amnesty, institutionalization for those unfortunates who are sociopathic. And a new social structure, a new understanding, new agreements.
The "law" is only what we agree on. Anything more or less is illegitimate and likely destructive, and we've had enough destructive. Have heart, we're close.
Think about this question:
Why should I give MY money to someone who needs it?
People who have money think about this question differently than those who need money. When you move from the former class to the later, notice how your thinking changes.
When you had a good paying job and a home, did you help out the homeless, the destitute, the incarcerated? Why be surprised then, or disheartened, that those who still have homes and bank accounts do not rush to share them with those who don't.
It's socialism or barbarism.
One major contradiction in the middle-class social contract is apparent now, and currently defies solution. The size of the middle-class and its prosperity owe much to imperialism.
The role of the national state in all of this gets confused. Imperial success re-introduces competition among workers across national boundaries. To the degree that globalization actually removes national barriers (by essentially removing the sovereignty of the lesser nations), the out-migration of capital is inevitable. There are two side-effects to this. On the one hand, the old scheme is based on international production but domestic consumption... i.e. the "home market". The reduction of real wages in the developed countries upends this formula. The alternative is to develop domestic consumption in "emerging markets". Certainly this is anarchic and unpredictable (social conditions vary, and nobody is specifically "tasked" with such a "mission"). The larger problem, though, is it sets up a larger contradiction.
The exterior infrastructure of the home country - its military capability, its garrisons, its colonial institutions - are largely funded by internal taxation. The leverage which the national state once had in taxing its own capitalists is somewhat undermined by the new-found mobility of its now truly global entrepreneurs. The irony is that those who are increasingly the only ones benefiting from the success of Empire, become largely exempt from Imperial "responsibilities", even as their entire existence becomes solely dependent on the continuation of that Empire.
On the other hand, working class, and especially middle-class, taxation becomes more and more burdensome as the standard of living stagnates or falls. The irony is that the middle-class is paying for its own demise, but it rarely appears this clearly. What is clear is that domestic consumption which drove domestic revenues and, through them, made the world safe for empire, becomes, in its turn, just another force undermining the middle-class social contract. Suddenly, government becomes "too big".
This peculiar turnabout actually predates the modern state and is visible in virtually all Empires going back to the Romans and before. It is certainly at the center of British politics for more than a century. Still... it all leads to a set of questions:
Does the "middle-class", or do its major component parts, really have a stake in Empire? Do they have a stake only at the beginning and not at the end of the process? What are the political implications of this and are they even felt in the short time-frames that result from this dilemma? All of this fuels reaction and "radicalism" but does it really have the ability to survive even a decade in such a form?
mcoyote:
Great summary of much of the first world’s dilemma.
What is puzzling to me is whether the elite actors behind the scene really have any sort of plan or is there just a incoherent tug of war between these actors that enforces the status quo of neo-liberal doctrine in an attempt to level the playing field internationally so that we are all beholden to those that prosper from this dysfunctional system.
What is amazing is how pliable the ‘we the people’ tax payers are in supporting the corporate welfare of those who prosper from gushers in the gulf, non stop wars, and casino capitalism.
When much of our economy is a service one based on exploitation of labor in the third world, it should not come as a surprise that most of us are not really needed except as consumers even if this were based on a minimum living allowance or public works programs.
The Bush/Cheney Depression is doing what it was supposed to do. Wonder how that wonder kid Bush is doing? Does he have all his brush cleared yet?
Democrats were behind them 100% of the time, so you can't only blame Bush and Cheney. Number of Democrat filibusters during 8 years of Bush: ZERO.
Obama himself as president is deepening the insanity by escalating Bush's wars and giving Wall Street, car makers, health insurers and oil companies like BP more than they ever dreamed of under Bush.
So not true....... but too many platitudes to argue with.
America should do itself a favor......... go to the Clinton Presidential Library in Arkansas. You will relive what America was before the appointment of Bush/Cheney. The Tea Baggers say we can't get back there............. they are so wrong. This election is crucial though--we need to get rid of the Party of No.
Dear William,
This is nothing personal, but I'll skip going to the Clinton Presidential Library, even when I go home for a visit later this fall to my hometown in Joplin, Missouri, just a hop, skip, and a few jumps north of the Arkansas border.
Bill Clinton is largely to blame for this mess we are in. Al From's DLC formulated the core policy direction of Bill Clinton, who campaigned on, supported, and signed into law bloody "free trade" agreements NAFTA, GATT, and the formation of the WTO.
Bill Clinton also signed into law, in his last month of office, the Financial Services Modernization Act, which discarded Glass-Stegal.
There is no doubt, that Reagan started the deregulation ball rolling, but it is under the Administration of Bill Clinton, that the massive exodus of jobs through direct government incentives and the new trade agreements, that absolutely has directly put us into our current economic disaster.
Why would we want to go back to an unsustainable economic system that we had before? We'll just end up back in the same boat again.
Our entire economy in the go-go 80's and 90's was based on unsustainable levels of consumption, based on unsustainable levels of credit, based on based on unsustainable growth ... particularly fantasy bubble 'growth' of real estate value (residential and commercial).
I really do not understand why this or any administration wants to 'recover' us back to that.
The only reason to go to the Clinton Library would be to piss on it. No, actually, it would be better to take it over as a home for homeless unemployed folks.
Oh sure I'd LOVE to visit the Clinton Library! Does it have a well documented list of all his war crimes?
Does it have a well documented list of all the bribe money that he received for signing NAFTA/GATT into law, which sent millions of American jobs overseas?
Does it have a well documented list of the millions of poor Americans that he backstabbed when he ended "welfare as we know it" in 1996?
What about a list of all the bankers that became billionaires under Clinton when he signed laws that created the current mortgage crisis?
Dem Party Apologists and Dem Kool-aid Drinkers like you are just as detrimental as the Tea Baggers.
And your "too many platitudes to argue with" is a classic cop out by someone who can't really offer arguments.
"We" are living Plato's Republic. That is a theme of mine here on CD. Steal the money, all the money. Keep all the money and power forever. Any ideology beyond the money is simply a diversion.
The Spartan's made their slaves wear dog skin caps and clothing. Why? To humiliate. Young slaves who showed promise of growing to be large physical men would be killed. The Spartans had no intention of ever giving up power.
History is the story of bloody oppression by the few. Would people who submit to drug testing at Walmart wear dog skin caps? America is dying the death of a thousand cuts. ‘Don't go quietly into the night. Rage! Rage! Rage!'
About ten days ago, a commenter here said we are not in a recession or a depression. The United States has experienced a paradigm shift. How right that person was. Welcome to the Dog Skin Republic whose National Motto is : Bend Over and Grab Your Ankles.
Everybody should read your comment for you have described the fate of the United States in three succinct paragraphs.
I love my dog. Can I just wear him over my shoulders? He's only 90 pounds...
Seriously, you've made an astute and concise statement. Thanks.
Great post! Thanks.
Rage!
Rage!
Against the dying of our rights!
The economy is now so bad in Camden that even the criminals are struggling and going short. "Even the guys who got money from illegal means really don't want to spend it," . . .
The Great Nightcrawler, aka, Barack Obama, should take heed. Here is the source of your political doom in 2012, for the economy will be no better then than it is now. You can swathe your economic ruthlessness and brutality in kid gloves but your electoral fate will remain unchanged.
"Even the guys who got money from illegal means really don't want to spend it," . . .
Ha! I picked up on that quote, too, and my first thought was "I'll bet the bankers and brokers and military profiteers and all their ilk who 'got money from illegal means' aren't holding back their spending." Yachts, after all, are expensive to maintain, as are luxury autos, mansions, private jets, security, prostitutes, private clubs...
I feel the hatred starting to churn...
As for Obama, he's a one-termer, with the possible exception of an accelerated collapse within two years inspiring him to declare a national emergency and postpone elections. Bush left that plan for him, too.
In the deep recession of the 1981-84 period unemployment was extended up to 3yrs for ex-workers in the Midwestern states, probably everywhere. Now it is those state's like N. Dakota, Nebraska, S. Dakota and The Old South mixed with lightly populated Western American states who are blocking further aid. The pattern is very apparent. Rural, small states have already experienced their shared diaspora. Citizens fled these places and depopulated the workforce a long time ago. The excess moved to the cities of this country. Now the cities are expelling their excess workers. Cities have grown and some states have experienced large growth in 30 years. This is where the issue really becomes a philosophical one. ALL the states I have mentioned have DEMOCRATIC Senators who are blocking further unemployment extentions. They are doing so with LARGE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITIES in both houses, claiming fiscal austerity is necessary, not more aid to the unlucky. Let's add up their entire population base: it is then perfectly clear that 10% or less of the entire population is blocking the desires of 90% of the rest of the citizens of this country thru arcane, byzantine and petrified SENATORIAL PROCEDURES. The conclusions drawn could be several but the point is a Democratic Party problem, period. Why should West or East Coast constiuents of the SUPERMAJORITY Party; the Democrats, support ANY issues which primarily effect rural, small states. Or ,why should we support a union and it's political apparatus that allows this type of political discrimination of democratic principles. I have long advocated the splitting of this country into regional areas and substates with a common, shared defense treaty. I do not want to put my life and liberty into the hands of the most Conservative Wing of the supermajority. Either change the Senate rules, whip the renegade Dems back into line or become a chapter in American history that signalled the end of the Democratic Party. I don't care at this point about a more perfect union or The Confederates States or being ruled by politicians that haven't got a clue where their bread is being buttered by transfer payments from Federal laws they corruptly added 100 years ago. People are " coming out " in great numbers these days and it is no big thing. The hypocrites and eltes are being " outed " for their hypocrisy on life and death issues facing most of the citizens not residing in Washington, D.C. We may see the end of the Democratic Party by 2012 and a lot of good people may bite the dust. Maybe that is the medicine this country needs to heal itself or die. The question clearly lies in the hands of the MAJORITY PARTY of this country. For myself, I would rather not waste another breath trying to explain The Old Confederacy and their conservative, ignorant citizens to visitors from other countries who are confounded by their backwardness and racism. But, then, we all have our personal crosses to bear.
"it is then perfectly clear that 10% or less of the entire population is blocking the desires of 90% of the rest of the citizens of this country thru arcane, byzantine and petrified SENATORIAL PROCEDURES." -- linkwray
I have brought up this issue a number of times on CD -- I lived in Nebraska for a number of years, and one of their so-called Democratic senators, Ben Nelson, consistently holds all of us hostage. Nebraska has a population of about 1,800,000 people. I live in NYC, a city of 8 million people. And, Ben Nelson still holds me hostage even though I no longer live there. The state of Montana -- the state Max Baucus calls home -- has a population of about 970,000, even less than Nebraska. And, Max held us all hostage during the so-called health care debates, the debates that never really took place.
North Dakota population: about 640,000.
South Dakota population: about 800,000
These 4 states, all together, don't add up to the population of NYC. Just some examples I thought I'd share.