Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Former CIA Agent's Hunt for bin Laden in Pakistani Badlands
He is sick and exhausted, and suffering from food poisoning. Back home in the US his father is dying of cancer. The plumbing is basic, the heat intense — the generator has failed again. He pores over cables looking for any scrap of information — an intercepted phone call, an aerial photograph — that might finally end the hunt for Osama bin Laden.
The fruitless search has essentially been outsourced by the US to a network of Pashtun spies run by the Pakistani intelligence services.
Mr Keller was one of an estimated 50 to 100 CIA agents and special operations officers whose mission for the past eight years has been to find and kill bin Laden and other top al-Qaeda leaders in the hostile and forbidding Pakistani border region, where he is believed to be hiding.
Mr Keller, 39, volunteered for the bin Laden team and was sent in 2006 to become acting chief of one of the CIA’s bases in the heart of al-Qaeda and Taleban territory in Waziristan. It was an experience that leaves him wondering today if the al-Qaeda leader will ever be found.
Mr Keller was not an obvious choice for the job — he spoke no Middle Eastern languages, and was not an expert on al-Qaeda or Pakistan. Yet in 2006, with many resources diverted to Iraq, the CIA was desperate for agents to join the hunt.
Today this is changing. The agency is bringing back CIA retirees — a group known as The Cadre — many of whom are veterans who worked with the Afghan Mujahidin during the Soviet occupation in the 1980s.
Mr Keller’s replacement when he left Shawshank — the nickname given to his base in Waziristan because it resembled the prison life depicted in The Shawshank Redemption — was one such man, a grey-haired, CIA veteran, 65, who speaks Pashtu.
“Some of these guys have been hunting bin Laden for years,” Mr Keller says. His replacement, whom Mr Keller believes is still in Pakistan, has spent eight months a year since the September 11 attacks working out of these CIA safe houses looking for the top al-Qaeda leadership.
“One of the things the agency has done is to bring back these old hands,” Mr Keller says, men who despite their age “are willing to spend many months in conditions most people would say is akin to prison”. Mr Keller, who has retired from the CIA and is now a freelance writer in New Mexico, adds: “The divorce rate is very high — it’s through the roof. Yet it’s part of the allure that keeps on driving them back. A lot of the time you are just sitting there reading stuff but you are also in the right area, it’s the big show — you are at retirement age but are you really going to sign up for the bowling league?”
The hunt for bin Laden is largely run by the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence service, an organisation for whom many CIA officials harbour deep mistrust because of its historical ties to the Pashtuns of Waziristan.
Mr Keller says the nerve centre of the hunt is in Islamabad but the ground operation is run from decrepit bases such as Shawshank. The hub of the operation was the communications room, from where he worked alongside officials from other branches of the US intelligence agencies.
Here they would pour over intelligence collected from electronic intercepts, aerial photographs taken by unmanned drones, and human intelligence collected by Pashtun spies. CIA agents were rarely allowed to leave the compound by the Pakistanis.
One reason was that blond-haired agents such as Mr Keller would be targets for assassination. The other is that the Pakistanis like to have control of the hunt. Any spying was done by local Pashtuns, and under the watchful eye of the Pakistani authorities.
“Our role in the hunt was done entirely from in front of a computer inside the base,” Mr Keller says. When he wanted to follow up a lead, he would get in touch with a local Pashtun proxy to ask him to travel to a certain area to glean information.
It is dangerous work. In 2005 the CIA recruited a local mullah to go into Waziristan to report back on any Arabs in the area — a sign that bin Laden, a Saudi, could be near by. Days later the mullah was found on a roadside, beheaded, a message tucked into his shirt that this was the fate of spies.
When a senior al-Qaeda figure was identified and located — Mr Keller said that it would take weeks, often months, to build a case for an airstrike by a US Predator drone — and even if the go-ahead was finally given by CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, the Pakistanis still had to approve. “Since 9/11, with 99 per cent of these strikes, the Pakistanis were consulted and they have to approve them,” he said.
There has not been one credible lead on bin Laden in years. His nickname among some CIA hunters is Elvis because of all the bogus and fanciful sightings. The CIA has been successful in killing many of the senior al-Qaeda over the years but bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, are different cases.
Mr Keller believes bin Laden moves from village to village in Waziristan. He communicates perhaps just once a month, and by courier. He never uses a telephone. Mr Keller believes that bin Laden arrives in each village with a small group of bodyguards, when he will sit and talk to the local tribal leader. A large bribe is paid.
Bin Laden is then the guest of the village, where under Pashtun custom, he must be protected. The main obstacle in finding him, Mr Keller says, is that even if someone wanted to betray him — and collect the $25 million (£15 million) reward — there is no one to turn to. The local police know bin Laden is there. “If you report bin Laden’s location there is a good chance you will get killed,” Mr Keller says.
“People in a position to give information can’t get it to anyone.” Morale is still good among the hunters, he says, because many top al-Qaeda officials have been killed. So will bin Laden be caught? Mr Keller lets out a deep breath. “I don’t know.”

20 Comments so far
Show AllIt is no surprise that a piece this informative and honest is not in a US-based media outlet. It is to the ISI's advantage that Osama bin Ladin remain out there, as it allows them to "tailor" the information to their advantage & keep US $ for this "effort" flowing.
Also of a side note is how ill-equipped the CIA is for intelligence operations in the Muslim world to where they have to bring out retirement Pashtu speaking agents who tramped through there in the 80's.
A third side note and further reflective of the miasma that afflicts US media -- this article actually acknowledges that this debacle is going on in Pashtun lands and that Puktanwali (the Pashtun honor code) is a big factor in the whole enterprise.
double post
Bin Laden is dead...................
http://www.informationclearinghouse.
info/article23127.htm
Bin Laden supposedly has kidney problems that require he use a dialysis machine, or at least that was the word back in 2001 prior to 9/11 when he was supposedly met by a CIA operative at the hospital where he was undergoing treatment. The article at the following libk details that and other items, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9542
After reading the linked item, one must conclude the above item to be black propaganda, which is why it's not in the US media.
Obviously, Obama could say that if Osama turns himself in, the US will immediately withdraw it's troops from AfPak.
Is bin Laden alive? The CIA probably doesn't know; it has so often been incorrect. The Pakis are smart to keep the CIA under physical control. The real problem is that, even if alive, bin Laden is most likely irrelevant. To use the cancer analogy, the al Qaeda movement metastasized widely due to US led invasions.
The entire article is a crock.
The most laughable statement is getting permission from Pakistan before we launch another drone attack. Since when does the CIA ask permission to kill any Muslim they deem needs to die?
How sweet.
According to this Times Online/UK report, "50 to 100 CIA agents and special operations operators whose mission for the last eight years has been to find and kill bin Laden and other top Al Qaeda leaders in the hostile and forbidding Pakistani border region..... [have been] forbidden by Pakistaki minders from venturing out into the badlands of Waziristan....."
"The fruitless search has essentially been outsourced by the US to a network of Pashtun spies run by the Pakistani intelligence services."
"The hunt for bin Laden is largely run by the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence service, an organisation for whom many CIA officials harbour deep mistrust......"
"Any spying was done by local Pashtuns, and under the watchful eye of the Pakistani authorities."
"There has not been one credible lead on bin Laden in years."
There is solid reason to believe exactly the same outsourcing dynamic was in play in the months immediately preceding the 9/11 attacks. The Bush/Cheney White House with held from Congress, and from the 911 Commission, all of the evidence about the working relationship in place between the US national security team and the Pakistani ISI.
Who the hell do you think was translating all that intercepted electronic chatter into English?
How was it possible for the incredibly detailed chronological account of the high jackers' identities, whereabouts, and modus operandi to be assembled and published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other major mainstream publications so quickly - while the WTC rubble was literally still smoldering - unless there was a snitch or two on the inside, perhaps even a double agent?
The link between the Pakistani ISI, US intelligence, and the 9/11 attacks was the story that Daniel Pearl was after, the story which cost him his head.
Eight years have now passed.
President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and CIA director Leon Panetta could declassify, and make public, the linkage that existed in 2001 between the Pakistani ISI and the Bush/Cheney national security team. They could do so tomorrow - if the will to reassert civilian control over the clandestine paramilitary operations of our spooks and soldier spies could be mustered, in the interests of open government, political accountability, and historical accuracy.
Come to think of it, rather than tomorrow, this upcoming Friday would be the perfect occasion for such a fireside chat. If this Times/UK account is anywhere near accurate, then we have fool me once, fool me twice, fool me once again in endless replay, in the Afghanistan "theatre of operations."
Who was it who said sunlight is always the best disinfectant?
Bill from Saginaw
Re. who was doing the translations leading up to the 9-11 attacks, I don't know about Pakistanis or Pashtuns, but Sibel Edmonds certainly has said that their were Turks.
See bradblog (dot com) for video recordings of her August 8th under-oath testimony given in Ohio, and he, Brad Friedman, has more videos and articles about what Sibel Edmonds has been long saying. She has her own website as well, JustACitizen dot org.
Oddly, I can't make posts more than two paragraphs long.
I've been having a lot of difficulty posting at CD, including when my posts had no links, but figured to not provide full, hard, ... links in this post to see if it does get posted. Hence the lack of normal links in my above post.
According to this Times Online/UK report, "50 to 100 CIA agents and special operations operators whose mission for the last eight years has been to find and kill bin Laden and other top Al Qaeda leaders in the hostile and forbidding Pakistani border region..... [have been] forbidden by Pakistaki minders from venturing out into the badlands of Waziristan....."
"The fruitless search has essentially been outsourced by the US to a network of Pashtun spies run by the Pakistani intelligence services."
"The hunt for bin Laden is largely run by the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence service, an organisation for whom many CIA officials harbour deep mistrust......"
"Any spying was done by local Pashtuns, and under the watchful eye of the Pakistani authorities."
"There has not been one credible lead on bin Laden in years."
There is solid reason to believe exactly the same outsourcing dynamic was in play in the months immediately preceding the 9/11 attacks. The Bush/Cheney White House with held from Congress, and from the 911 Commission, all of the evidence about the working relationship in place between the US national security team and the Pakistani ISI.
Who the hell do you think was translating all that intercepted electronic chatter into English?
How was it possible for the incredibly detailed chronological account of the high jackers' identities, whereabouts, and modus operandi to be assembled and published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other major mainstream publications so quickly - while the WTC rubble was literally still smoldering - unless there was a snitch or two on the inside, perhaps even a double agent?
The link between the Pakistani ISI, US intelligence, and the 9/11 attacks was the story that Daniel Pearl was after, the story which cost him his head.
Eight years have now passed.
President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and CIA director Leon Panetta could declassify, and make public, the linkage that existed in 2001 between the Pakistani ISI and the Bush/Cheney national security team. They could do so tomorrow - if the will to reassert civilian control over the clandestine paramilitary operations of our spooks and soldier spies could be mustered, in the interests of open government, political accountability, and historical accuracy.
Come to think of it, rather than tomorrow, this upcoming Friday would be the perfect occasion for such a fireside chat. If this Times/UK account is anywhere near accurate, then we have fool me once, fool me twice, fool me once again in endless replay, in the Afghanistan "theatre of operations."
Who was it who said sunlight is always the best disinfectant?
Bill from Saginaw
Sorry about the double post. Don't know what happened.
Bill from Saginaw
Bill from Saginaw September 9th, 2009 5:21 pm..................Just delete it and type in mispost or anything.
You could've simply edited your duplicate post, deleted the content, and replaced it with, "Oops, duplicate post. Now deleted", f.e.
For some truly history and because of the troubles I've been having posting more than a couple of short paragraphs at CD, I'll just provide some references regarding the U.S. in Afghanistan since 1979; prior to the invasion of Russia and provoking that invasion. Look for the following piece at www.GlobalResearch.ca.
"The CIA's Intervention in Afghanistan
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski,
President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998
Posted at (GR, the link removed for this post) 15 October 2001"
Look for the following piece at GlobalResearch dot ca.
"Hearing On US Interests In The Central Asian Republics
House of Representatives,
Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific,
Committee on International Relations,
Washington, DC.
(government Web page link removed for this post)
12 February 1998
Centre for Research on Globalisation, (link removed), 20 October 2001"
Sorry about this being a third post. All three would've been one, if it wasn't for all of the problems posting at CD starting around a week ago.
Look for the following piece at GlobalResearch dot ca.
"Clinton Administration supported the "Militant Islamic Base"
Editorial note
Posted at (GR, link removed) 21 September 2001"
Duplicate post snipped. I'm having plenty of troubles posting at CD as of very recently.
Also note that if Osama bin Ladin was truly believed to be guilty, the U.S. never indicted him. He is not on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list and an FBI agent or official told an inquiring reporter that the reason was that it's up to the Dept. of Justice or Supreme Court or something like that to decide whether OBL is guilty and this decision was never arrived at.
Within a few days following the 9-11 attacks, over 100 Saudis were flown out of the U.S. when the U.S. C-in-C had placed the whole airspace over the U.S. under total lockdown, the White House administration ruled. No one else was allowed to fly in U.S. airspace; total lockdown. Of these Saudis, there were I believe to recall over 20 of OBL"s family members.
The CIA's word is to usually be disbelieved. REMEMBER CIA history; black, dirty, ... covert ops and all over this planet. Op. Phoenix, and many others. After all, we're talking CIA ops, not analysis, in Pakistan.
We do not even have actual proof that Al Qaeda's responsible for the 9-11 attacks. We have claims that they are, but not really proof.
I got a longer post successfully posted this time, above; after having just tried to make the above post with Firefox 3.5.2 and Mozilla's Seamonkey suite browser, with both failing. The above was made with K-Meleon, although it failed when I tried to edit the above post to add this comment.
Has CD very recently changed its server software? If yes, then could there be some parameters in this new software that need to be set, unset, tweaked, ....? There's a problem somewhere and I guess that it's either at my end, while I don't know what I've added or removed of software(s) that could possibly cause this problem with posting at CD; or perhaps the problem is with the ISP for the ADSL or DSL service we use here, too. If neither of those is where the problem is and CD has changed server software, then I guess that that software's settings need to be verified. I'm no expert in this "stuff".