Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
2 US Architects of Harsh Tactics in 9/11’s Wake
WASHINGTON — Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen were military retirees and psychologists, on the lookout for business opportunities. They found an excellent customer in the Central Intelligence Agency, where in 2002 they became the architects of the most importantinterrogation program in the history of American counterterrorism.
They had never carried out a real interrogation, only mock sessions in the military training they had overseen. They had no relevant scholarship; their Ph.D. dissertations were on high blood pressure and family therapy. They had no language skills and no expertise on Al Qaeda.
But they had psychology credentials and an intimate knowledge of a brutal treatment regimen used decades ago by Chinese Communists. For an administration eager to get tough on those who had killed 3,000 Americans, that was enough.
So “Doc Mitchell” and “Doc Jessen,” as they had been known in the Air Force, helped lead the United States into a wrenching conflict over torture, terror and values that seven years later has not run its course.
Dr. Mitchell, with a sonorous Southern accent and the sometimes overbearing confidence of a self-made man, was a former Air Force explosives expert and a natural salesman. Dr. Jessen, raised on an Idaho potato farm, joined his Air Force colleague to build a thriving business that made millions of dollars selling interrogation and training services to the C.I.A.
Seven months after President Obama ordered the C.I.A. interrogation program closed, its fallout still commands attention. In the next few weeks, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is expected to decide whether to begin a criminal torture investigation, in which the psychologists’ role is likely to come under scrutiny. The Justice Department ethics office is expected to complete a report on the lawyers who pronounced the methods legal. And the C.I.A. will soon release a highly critical 2004 report on the program by the agency’s inspector general.
Col. Steven M. Kleinman, an Air Force interrogator and intelligence officer who knows Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen, said he thought loyalty to their country in the panicky wake of the Sept. 11 attacks prompted their excursion into interrogation. He said the result was a tragedy for the country, and for them.
“I feel their primary motivation was they thought they had skills and insights that would make the nation safer,” Colonel Kleinman said. “But good persons in extreme circumstances can do horrific things.”
For the C.I.A., as well as for the gray-goateed Dr. Mitchell, 58, and the trim, dark-haired Dr. Jessen, 60, the change in administrations has been neck-snapping. For years, President George W. Bush declared the interrogation program lawful and praised it for stopping attacks. Mr. Obama, by contrast, asserted that its brutality rallied recruits for Al Qaeda; called one of the methods, waterboarding, torture; and, in his first visit to the C.I.A., suggested that the interrogation program was among the agency’s “mistakes.”
The psychologists’ subsequent fall from official grace has been as swift as their rise in 2002. Today the offices of Mitchell Jessen and Associates, the lucrative business they operated from a handsome century-old building in downtown Spokane, Wash., sit empty, its C.I.A. contracts abruptly terminated last spring.
With a possible criminal inquiry looming, Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen have retained a well-known defense lawyer, Henry F. Schuelke III. Mr. Schuelke said they would not comment for this article, which is based on dozens of interviews with the doctors’ colleagues and present and former government officials.
In a brief e-mail exchange in June, Dr. Mitchell said his nondisclosure agreement with the C.I.A. prevented him from commenting. He suggested that his work had been mischaracterized.
“Ask around,” Dr. Mitchell wrote, “and I’m sure you will find all manner of ‘experts’ who will be willing to make up what you’d like to hear on the spot and unrestrained by reality.”
A Career Shift
At the time of the Sept. 11 attacks, Dr. Mitchell had just retired from his last military job, as psychologist to an elite special operations unit in North Carolina. Showing his entrepreneurial streak, he had started a training company called Knowledge Works, which he operated from his new home in Florida, to supplement retirement pay.
But for someone with Dr. Mitchell’s background, it was evident that the campaign against Al Qaeda would produce opportunities. He began networking in military and intelligence circles where he had a career’s worth of connections.
He had grown up poor in Florida, Dr. Mitchell told friends, and joined the Air Force in 1974, seeking adventure. Stationed in Alaska, he learned the art of disarming bombs and earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology.
Robert J. Madigan, a psychology professor at the University of Alaska who had worked closely with him, remembered Dr. Mitchell stopping by years later. He had completed his doctorate at the University of South Florida in 1986, comparing diet and exercise in controlling hypertension, and was working for the Air Force in Spokane.
“I remember him saying they were preparing people for intense interrogations,” Dr. Madigan said.
Military survival training was expanded after the Korean War, when false confessions by American prisoners led to sensational charges of communist “brainwashing.” Military officials decided that giving service members a taste of Chinese-style interrogation would prepare them to withstand its agony.
Air Force survival training was consolidated in 1966 at Fairchild Air Force Base in the parched hills outside Spokane. The name of the training, Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape, or SERE, suggests its breadth: airmen and women learn to live off the land and avoid capture, as well as how to behave if taken prisoner.
In the 1980s, Dr. Jessen became the SERE psychologist at the Air Force Survival School, screening instructors who posed as enemy interrogators at the mock prison camp and making sure rough treatment did not go too far. He had grown up in a Mormon community with a view of Grand Teton, earning a doctorate at Utah State studying “family sculpting,” in which patients make physical models of their family to portray emotional relationships.
Dr. Jessen moved in 1988 to the top psychologist’s job at a parallel “graduate school” of survival training, a short drive from the Air Force school. Dr. Mitchell took his place.
The two men became part of what some Defense Department officials called the “resistance mafia,” experts on how to resist enemy interrogations. Both lieutenant colonels and both married with children, they took weekend ice-climbing trips together.
While many subordinates considered them brainy and capable leaders, some fellow psychologists were more skeptical. At the annual conference of SERE psychologists, two colleagues recalled, Dr. Mitchell offered lengthy put-downs of presentations that did not suit him.
At the Air Force school, Dr. Mitchell was known for enforcing the safety of interrogations; it might surprise his later critics to learn that he eliminated a tactic called “manhandling” after it produced a spate of neck injuries, a colleague said.
At the SERE graduate school, Dr. Jessen is remembered for an unusual job switch, from supervising psychologist to mock enemy interrogator.
Dr. Jessen became so aggressive in that role that colleagues intervened to rein him in, showing him videotape of his “pretty scary” performance, another official recalled.
Always, former and current SERE officials say, it is understood that the training mimics the methods of unscrupulous foes.
Mark Mays, the first psychologist at the Air Force school, said that to make the fake prison camp realistic, officials consulted American P.O.W.’s who had just returned from harrowing camps in North Vietnam.
“It was clear that this is what we’d expect from our enemies,” said Dr. Mays, now a clinical psychologist and lawyer in Spokane. “It was not something I could ever imagine Americans would do.”
Start of the Program
In December 2001, a small group of professors and law enforcement and intelligence officers gathered outside Philadelphia at the home of a prominent psychologist, Martin E. P. Seligman, to brainstorm about Muslim extremism. Among them was Dr. Mitchell, who attended with a C.I.A. psychologist, Kirk M. Hubbard.
During a break, Dr. Mitchell introduced himself to Dr. Seligman and said how much he admired the older man’s writing on “learned helplessness.” Dr. Seligman was so struck by Dr. Mitchell’s unreserved praise, he recalled in an interview, that he mentioned it to his wife that night. Later, he said, he was “grieved and horrified” to learn that his work had been cited to justify brutal interrogations.
Dr. Seligman had discovered in the 1960s that dogs that learned they could do nothing to avoid small electric shocks would become listless and simply whine and endure the shocks even after being given a chance to escape.
Helplessness, which later became an influential concept in the treatment of human depression, was also much discussed in military survival training. Instructors tried to stop short of producing helplessness in trainees, since their goal was to strengthen the spirit of service members in enemy hands.
Dr. Mitchell, colleagues said, believed that producing learned helplessness in a Qaeda interrogation subject might ensure that he would comply with his captor’s demands. Many experienced interrogators disagreed, asserting that a prisoner so demoralized would say whatever he thought the interrogator expected.
At the C.I.A. in December 2001, Dr. Mitchell’s theories were attracting high-level attention. Agency officials asked him to review a Qaeda manual, seized in England, that coached terrorist operatives to resist interrogations. He contacted Dr. Jessen, and the two men wrote the first proposal to turn the enemy’s brutal techniques — slaps, stress positions, sleep deprivation, wall-slamming and waterboarding — into an American interrogation program.
By the start of 2002, Dr. Mitchell was consulting with the C.I.A.’s Counterterrorist Center, whose director, Cofer Black, and chief operating officer, Jose A. Rodriguez Jr., were impressed by his combination of visceral toughness and psychological jargon. One person who heard some discussions said Dr. Mitchell gave the C.I.A. officials what they wanted to hear. In this person’s words, Dr. Mitchell suggested that interrogations required “a comparable level of fear and brutality to flying planes into buildings.”
By the end of March, when agency operatives captured Abu Zubaydah, initially described as Al Qaeda’s No. 3, the Mitchell-Jessen interrogation plan was ready. At a secret C.I.A. jail in Thailand, as reported in prior news accounts, two F.B.I agents used conventional rapport-building methods to draw vital information from Mr. Zubaydah. Then the C.I.A. team, including Dr. Mitchell, arrived.
With the backing of agency headquarters, Dr. Mitchell ordered Mr. Zubaydah stripped, exposed to cold and blasted with rock music to prevent sleep. Not only the F.B.I. agents but also C.I.A. officers at the scene were uneasy about the harsh treatment. Among those questioning the use of physical pressure, according to one official present, were the Thailand station chief, the officer overseeing the jail, a top interrogator and a top agency psychologist.
Whether they protested to C.I.A. bosses is uncertain, because the voluminous message traffic between headquarters and the Thailand site remains classified. One witness said he believed that “revisionism” in light of the torture controversy had prompted some participants to exaggerate their objections.
As the weeks passed, the senior agency psychologist departed, followed by one F.B.I. agent and then the other. Dr. Mitchell began directing the questioning and occasionally speaking directly to Mr. Zubaydah, one official said.
In late July 2002, Dr. Jessen joined his partner in Thailand. On Aug. 1, the Justice Department completed a formal legal opinion authorizing the SERE methods, and the psychologists turned up the pressure. Over about two weeks, Mr. Zubaydah was confined in a box, slammed into the wall and waterboarded 83 times.
The brutal treatment stopped only after Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen themselves decided that Mr. Zubaydah had no more information to give up. Higher-ups from headquarters arrived and watched one more waterboarding before agreeing that the treatment could stop, according to a Justice Department legal opinion.
Lucrative Work
The Zubaydah case gave reason to question the Mitchell-Jessen plan: the prisoner had given up his most valuable information without coercion.
But top C.I.A. officials made no changes, and the methods would be used on at least 27 more prisoners, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who was waterboarded 183 times.
The business plans of Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen, meanwhile, were working out beautifully. They were paid $1,000 to $2,000 a day apiece, one official said. They had permanent desks in the Counterterrorist Center, and could now claim genuine experience in interrogating high-level Qaeda operatives.
Dr. Mitchell could keep working outside the C.I.A. as well. At the Ritz-Carlton in Maui in October 2003, he was featured at a high-priced seminar for corporations on how to behave if kidnapped. He created new companies, called Wizard Shop, later renamed Mind Science, and What If. His first company, Knowledge Works, was certified by the American Psychological Association in 2004 as a sponsor of continuing professional education. (A.P.A. dropped the certification last year.)
In 2005, the psychologists formed Mitchell Jessen and Associates, with offices in Spokane and Virginia and five additional shareholders, four of them from the military’s SERE program. By 2007, the company employed about 60 people, some with impressive résumés, including Deuce Martinez, a lead C.I.A. interrogator of Mr. Mohammed; Roger L. Aldrich, a legendary military survival trainer; and Karen Gardner, a senior training official at the F.B.I. Academy.
The company’s C.I.A. contracts are classified, but their total was well into the millions of dollars. In 2007 in a suburb of Tampa, Fla., Dr. Mitchell built a house with a swimming pool, now valued at $800,000.
The psychologists’ influence remained strong under four C.I.A. directors. In 2006, in fact, when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and her legal adviser, John B. Bellinger III, pushed back against the C.I.A.’s secret detention program and its methods, the director at the time, Michael V. Hayden, asked Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen to brief State Department officials and persuade them to drop their objections. They were unsuccessful.
By then, the national debate over torture had begun, and it would undo the psychologists’ business.
In a statement to employees on April 9, Leon E. Panetta, President Obama’s C.I.A. director, announced the “decommissioning” of the agency’s secret jails and repeated a pledge not to use coercion. And there was another item: “No C.I.A. contractors will conduct interrogations.”
Agency officials terminated the contracts for Mitchell Jessen and Associates, and the psychologists’ lucrative seven-year ride was over. Within days, the company had vacated its Spokane offices. The phones were disconnected, and at neighboring businesses, no one knew of a forwarding address.
- Posted in

29 Comments so far
Show AllPsychology, like accounting, has become another tainted occupation in the service of money and power. How about a lot more outcry about ethics from the honest practitioners of these trades?
Joe
We are out here, mental health workers, writing about and talking about ethics, but the media ignores us. Our society has sacrificed ethics for money and power. Here is an interesting interview with Coleen Rowley about what has happened to ethics in government. Coleen was an FBI agent for 24 years, taught constitutional law and ethics to law enforcement personnel in the 90's. Now she's a peace activist.
http://www.healingmagic.org/wbkm/paradigms/august92009.html
CD's discussion space is cutting off part of the url, so try
http://tinyurl.com/n5vqw8
Sick fuckin' puppies. But, then, if the decision at the top is to embark on a program of torture, I suppose that's who you'd want.
But, it's still funny--they're just like all the other grifters attracted to the money that was being spread around. Supporters say they were motivated by patriotism, but, it damned sure didn't take them long to starting using torture as if it were a giant ATM machine in their backyard.
Filthy lucre, I call it.
The repugs cried begged and tormented Clinton over his blow job affair. Yet there is nothing being said nabout so many wanting to give Bush one, or as many as he wanted. Especially the wanaberightwingnut neo-nazi men. Put them all in brown shirts so we will know exactly who the sneaky bastards are.
This article is an exercise in massive disinformation and simply stokes the red-herring issue of torture, which, while an appalling practice in itself, is only a symptom of the root problem of the illegitimacy of our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Note how many times the author uses phrases like "Qaeda operatives," "campaign against Al Qaeda," "Qaeda interrogation subject," and "[f]or an administration eager to get tough on those who had killed 3,000 Americans..."
As if the ragtag resistance fighters caught at random in those wretched countries were part of some great conspiracy against our "freedoms" and had anything whatsoever to do with the events of 9/11! Even if the official version of the attacks of that day were true (and anyone with eyes in his or her head and an open mind can see that it is not), it would still beggar belief to think that any of those poor bastards resisting the invaders and caught either by chance or because they were betrayed by some petty enemy bent on vendetta could possibly know anything about the Twin Towers events.
Aside from presenting military goons as basically good guys gone astray, the main purpose of the article, and of most of the coverage of the torture issue, is to perpetuate the narrative that the abuses committed by their like are mere "collateral damage" in an otherwise worthy cause that, because of the severity of the crimes to which it is the response, could be expected to produce such overzealous reactions.
Thus does this piece of so-called journalism serve to justify an unending war based on lies.
We must never accept this.
I wonder if it's really massive disinformation or just one among many reflections of a strong and pervasive reluctance at all levels to accept the reality -- that the system itself is rotten to its very core.
Or perhaps that core reality is so overwhelming that most people just can't deal with it and so tend to focus on relatively superficial symptoms instead. I see that tendency almost everywhere, not excluding some of the headline articles chosen here.
You may be right in part--that is, concerning the 9/11 narrative. But, as I said, how anyone with a brain could think that the mujahedin fighters rounded up en masse or betrayed by friends, neighors or acquaintances could have any knowledge at all about the events of 9/11, beggars belief, even if we accept the official narrative (which we don't). The writer of the article simply seems to be pressing automatically on certain buttons designed to elicit specific emotional responses in the brain-dead readership of the NYT.
Clovis wrote what I was thinking.
Torture in Iraq has nothing to do with the Saudi people implicated for the 3 towers coming down in NYC.
They are torturing the wrong people if they really want to find out what happened!
Quite so. Of course we don't really know what information they were actually trying to extract. In some cases, it would appear that they were probing for little more than some kind of self-justification entirely without regard for its highly dubious quality.
The dark ages have reawakened, the 911 attacks revealed all the king's soldiers and all the king's men along with the inquisition team all over again. The world is flat mentality is alive and well.
Torture...
What is it Good for...?
It's good for business...!
Who authorized/ordered the destruction of the interrogation videotapes, and did the get (destroy) them all?
These are very deep and troubling waters....
Who actually destroyed the tapes? Punishments all around....
"For an administration eager to get tough on those who had killed 3,000 Americans..."
A joke?
Eager to get tough on Dick Cheney et. al.?
Bingo!
"But good persons in extreme circumstances can do horrific things.”
I'm getting kinda tired of that remark. What were the extreme circumstances? 9/11, the all around excuse.
But mostly, it's just wrong. An "extreme circumstance" is the gold standard test of whether a person is good or not. Good people do good things in extreme circumstances.
Those psychologists were low life "entrepreneurs" without a particle of morals or "goodness", but the standards in the nation have reached bottom, so someone can call them "good people in extreme circumstances" without choking.
All those who are following Attorney General Eric Holder's ruminations over prosecuting torturers, top Bush/Cheney era decisionmakers who authorized torture, and the highly placed lawyer enablers who sought to rebrand torture to make it seem legal, should carefully parse the timeline in this NY Times piece.
Accepting for the moment the accuracy of this quite detailed article chronicling the origins of torture as official US government policy (and I agree with much of Clovis's observations about disinformation being interwoven within - including the bit about Condi Rice), here is what we get:
9/11/01: The shit hits the fan.
10/01 - 11/01: Mitchell and Jessen begin networking their old SERE military and intelligence connections to advise the CIA and Bush/Cheney White House on global war on terror interrogation policies.
12/01: A "small group of professors, law enforcement and intelligence officers gather outside Philadelphia at the home of a prominent psychologist, Martin E P Seligman, to brainstorm about Muslim extremism." During a break, Mitchell networks with host Dr. Seligman, an expert on inducing and studying learned helplessness in dogs by use of electroshocks during clinical experiments.
1/02: Mitchell is given a copy of a "Qaeda manual, seized in England, that coached terrorist operatives to resist interrogations." Mitchell contacts his old SERE colleague and mentor Jessen, and together they write a "first proposal" to turn "slaps, stress positions, sleep deprivation, wall slamming and waterboarding into an American interrogation program", as part of the war on terrorism. Cofer Black and Jose Rodriguez of the CIA's Counterterrorism Center are impressed by Mitchell's "visceral toughness and psychological jargon."
3/02 - 4/02: Mitchell/Jessen interrogation plan is ready. Abu Zubaydah is captured and interrogations begin at a secret black site in Thailand. Mitchell and a CIA team join FBI agents, who have successfully used conventional methods to gain info from Zubaydah. Zubaydah is stripped naked, subjected to cold, and blasted with rock music to prevent sleep.
5/2 - 6/02: FBI presence is gradually withdrawn, and Mitchell personally begins to take part in CIA-controlled questioning of Zubaydah.
7/02: Jessen joins Mitchell and the CIA team in Thailand. Interrogations continue.
8/02: Justice Department completes a secret legal opinion authorizing SERE interrogation methods. Psychologists Mitchell and Jessen "turned up the pressure. Over about two weeks, Zubaydah was confined in a box, slammed into a wall and waterboarded 83 times."
9/02: CIA briefs select Senators and House members in classified sessions about the existence of the CIA's enhanced interrogation program for the first time (mentioned in previous NY Times articles).
10/02 - 3/04: Enhanced interrogation techniques used on at least 27 more detainees held in US custody worldwide, including Khalid Sheik Mohammed (alleged mastermind of the 9/11 highjack conspiracy). KSM is waterboarded 183 times.
10/03: Mitchell is guest speaker at a Maui Ritz Carolton gathering of corporate executives, as an expert resource on behavior of potential kidnap victims.
4/04: Abu Ghraib photo scandal breaks, highlighted by man-on-the-box-in-the-hood-with-electrodes-attached. Shit hits the fan. Bush and Rumsfeld blame it all on bad apples at the bottom of the barrel. Videotapes of the KSM's waterboarding sessions are destroyed by the CIA before Congressional Committee can review them (mentioned in previous NY Times articles).
2005: Mitchell Jessen & Associates is formed with five additional shareholders, the new grantee corporation having offices in Seattle and Virginia.
2007: Mitchell Jessen & Associates has about sixty employees and "millions of dollars" in highly classified contracts with the CIA and other US intelligence agencies as a result of adoption of the Mitchell/Jessen interrogation approach by the Bush administration.
11/08: Barack Obama elected, following campaign in which torture is not a partisan issue because both Obama and GOP candidate John McCain vow to outlaw it and close Guantanamo Bay if elected (mentioned in previous NY Times articles)
4/09: Leon Panetta, new head of the CIA in the Obama administration, announces closure of CIA interrogaton black sites, and bans "CIA contractors" from conducting any detainee interrogations in the future. CIA terminates contracts with Mitchell Jessen & Associates. They lawyer up, take the money and run.
5/09 - 8/09: Former Vice President Dick Cheney makes series of public speeches accusing Obama administration of inviting a future terrorist attack on American soil by abandoning Bush era torture policies - policies Cheney claims (based upon classified records) thwarted over a dozen terrorist plots, and saved "thousands, perhaps tens of thousands" of innocent American lives (mentioned in previous NY Times articles).
Come on Mr. Holder.
Take a deep breath. Pull the trigger.
Do your job.
The decent people of this country will thank you and back you all the way.
Bill from Saginaw
I'll second your directions to Holder, Bill.
I'm interested by the breakdown of dates in this, though -- for which I thank you for your clarity.
What piques me is the originality this author grants Mitchell-Jesson when the CIA had extensively researched such techniques in the 50's, then taught them to Latin American goon-squads and used them themselves for decades.
I'm happy that Mr. Shane can print something that so damns these monsters in a corporate forum like the NYT, but the omission disturbs me.
I wonder - do you have a matching timeline for coverage of these events? I must confess that I got so ticked with the NYT's speak-no-evil policy that I quit following them in April '03, but their coverage in these years constitutes an historical event or non-event in itself.
Looks like a good list of people for GW Bush to have over for an evening of food and entertainment.
The current statements from Sibel Edmonds, and the fact that she has testified under subpoena, must not be too interesting to the alternative media (let alone the corporate media). Go check Google News to see how much coverage this is receiving, it's really quite striking. Maybe the lack of coverage means it's an important story.
Note: there are at least two distinct stories here. One is her recent court deposition. The other is her comments on a radio show regarding US ties to Bin Laden through 9/11.
Maybe Sibel Edmonds is only interesting to the media when she is completely gagged?
(I know there are those who think that anyone who is not talking about the big picture of 9/11, including No Plane Theory and the faked TV footage--which is my own understanding of what happende on 9/11--must be a government op. but I think that's a self-defeating assumption to make, even regarding an x-FBI agent.)
Who cares if Hastert, Feith, Scowcroft, et al have sold top secret information on how to design and build nuclear bombs to Turkey, And then they proceeded to sell that technology to Pakistan, North Korea, and other countries...?
So what if Turkey cut a deal with those traitors to give them a cut of the Afghanistan-Kosovo-Turkey heroin pipeline...?
Why bother investigating the BinLaden/Bush/Carlyle group connections...? Or that Osama was a CIA asset...?
Does it matter that Hastert is now the lobbyist for Turkey...?
Or that the Senate and the 9-11 Commission and the top brass of the FBI has known this for years and has done nothing...?
What's the big deal...?
so now we know 'whodunit'.............
Clovis-you said it. somehow we must find some way to grow up and face the truth. I wonder how many other societies we will destroy before we finally give in.
"”Colonel Kleinman said. “But good persons in extreme circumstances can do horrific things.”"
Listen, mercenary, good persons in extreme circumstances STILL DO HONORABLE THINGS. That’s why they are called GOOD people.
These architects of torture, Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, are certainly NOT good people, NOT good patriots, NOT good Americans. They are, as so many, ruthless psychopaths, who cut out their role of facilitators and henchmen for the abominable system the US has become.
Two more faces exposed for what they are. Faces of evil.
Read about a crime of unfathomable proportions trying to conceal the biggest scam in history: “Collateral Damage” by E. P Heidner, part I and II.
>>> www.scribd.com/people/documents/2169400-ep-heidner <<<
In the above article, Scott Shane of the NY Times wrote:
"For an administration eager to get tough on those who had killed 3,000 Americans, that was enough."
If Mr. Shane knew his facts about 9/11, he would know that 2974 people were killed on 9/11, not 3000, and that not all of these people were U.S. citizens, but that more than 90 countries lost citizens in the attacks on the World Trade Center.
For the exact counts and the countries of origin of the foreign victims, see "Casualties of September 11 Attacks" on Wikipedia.
Thank you for the public condemnation of two more leading perpetrators.
One aspect of this article bothers me. Author Shane writes throughout as though Mitchell and Jessen largely devised after 2001 torture techniques that the CIA has used for decades.
An article otherwise of this depth should prominently acknowledge the by now thoroughly documented truth: that torture has been a major part of US and CIA operations since the Second World War.
Why omit this?
Why imply that it is not so?
It's probably just more disinformation.
What is wrong with the USA ? ? ? ?
-- the most Christan country in the World ! ! ! !
American revenge for 9/11 has caused the murder over 1,331,754 Iraqis created over 4,000,000 Iraqi orphans completely destroyed that country with Depleted Uranium etc etc and that country had nothing to do with 9/11.
The USA has carried out over 300 X 9/11 on innocent people and more.
http://tinyurl.com/yrvqx
Scott Shane, I whole heartedly agree with your article with one exception. I get really angry when people use the term "architect" to describe the mastermind behind a plan or action that is not architectural in any way, shape or form. I am an architect. I trained many years and passed grueling exams so that I can call myself an architect. I know, as should all other people in the architectural profession, that it is a legal violation to call yourself an architect if you have not successfully passed the licensing process. So how does the rest of the world, particularly journalists, get away with using the term completely inappropriately?! Please stop it now!
Thank you very much.