Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US States May Axe Executions to Cut Costs
WASHINGTON - In an unexpected twist to the economic crisis, several US states are weighing whether to abolish the death penalty as the execution process proves too great a drain on dwindling resources.
Death penalty laws remain on the books of 36 of the 50 US states, and capital punishment is supported by some two-thirds of the American public.
Death penalty opponents demonstrate outside the Supreme Court in Washington. In an unexpected twist to the economic crisis, several US states are weighing whether to abolish the death penalty as the execution process proves too great a drain on dwindling resources. (photo: AFP) But across the nation, states as diverse and far-flung as Montana, Kansas, New Mexico and Maryland are among those actively considering abolishing capital punishment in a bid to overcome ballooning budget shortfalls.
"It is quite unusual that we've seen this blossoming of state legislative activity this year. It's because there is a renewed inspection of the death penalty," Steve Hall, director of the anti-capital punishment group Standdown, told AFP.
Most of the states involved in the move are those which have only executed a few people -- five or less -- in the past 30 years since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976. But "state legislators across America seem to be re-examining the death penalty," he said.
The financial savings could be considerable.
Carrying out the death penalty can leave a state footing a bill that is 10 times higher than for an inmate serving life imprisonment.
On top of a complex and lengthy process, appeals can last years and the prisoners are often represented by lawyers paid by the state.
Guarding death rows and death chambers are also costly items on a state's budget.
In Kansas, which has not carried out a single execution since 1976 but has nine men on death row, financial concerns trump other considerations.
Republican state senator Caroline McGinn has proposed a bill banning the death penalty starting in July in order to reduce the state's budget deficit.
Activists have calculated that in Kansas the cost of executing a prisoner is 70 percent higher than keeping someone in prison. The bill for a death row inmate tops 1.26 million dollars, while for someone serving life imprisonment costs 740,000 dollars, according to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC).
In New Mexico, politicians are hoping to pass a repeal law this year. The state, which has only executed one person in 30 years and has only two people on death row, could save a million dollars, observers say.
On Monday, Montana was debating a bill to abolish the death penalty and replace it with life in prison without parole, after years of failed efforts to repeal the law.
The northwestern state has only executed three people since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976. And only two inmates are currently housed on its death row, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
Nebraska and New Hampshire lawmakers are also considering repealing the current laws, while Oklahoma and Utah are considering limits on the death penalty.
Maryland, which has carried out five executions since 1976, seems closest to abolishing the death penalty with the support of governor, Martin O'Malley. According to figures from the DPIC, those five executions cost the state some 37.2 million dollars.
- Posted in



10 Comments so far
Show AllThere's one upside to the downturn.
A very good thing. The death penalty should be one that sees the prisoner buried behind walls, never to be released unless they could prove their innocence. An execution is more expensive than the mere cost of killing someone.
I'm glad that none of the politicians are arguing that they should just cut the 'red tape' that allows for appeals and lawyers.
It's weird how the motivation to save money is convincing legislatures and politicians to do what's always been fair, just, and right all along.
Mercenary mercy
Here's a not unrelated story.
Compare this with the parents in the Uk who had their two small dogs killed because they accidentally killed a 3 month baby left unattended by the parents.
If its ok to show mercy to humans who commit the most heinous acts, then it should be the same for non humans who simply act from survival.
Glad the parents resisted the urge for blind vengeance-even many anti-death penalty people would probably show their human supremacist bigotry and demand revenge.
Boy's body found in crocodile
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7896162.stm
The remains of a five-year-old Australian boy have been found in the stomach of a crocodile, police say.
Jeremy Doble was last seen on 8 February playing near his family's home beside a flooded mangrove swamp in northern Queensland.
Police now say he was attacked and eaten by a 14ft (4.3m) crocodile who was then trapped in a flooded river.
The announcement came after police examined the crocodile, using non-lethal surgical procedure.
"The family have requested that media respect their privacy at this time," police said in a statement.
Queensland officials say the animal will now be sent to a crocodile farm or zoo.
The victim's parents have reportedly asked authorities not to kill the crocodile.
I'd argue killing them is far more merciful than caging them for 40+ years. When you're dead, you're dead. No guarantee that they're still being punished for what you think/well the courts think/ they did. For all you know they're in heaven because god's a psycho who loves it when people kill each other.
It's disgusting that we only stop killing people because we just can't afford to. But whatever it takes.Maybe we will start seeing that we just can't afford to jail everyone that we want to, as well. But I'm not holding my breath, at this point.
In my state, doing such an act is somehow deemed "aiding terrorists". If you want to see your state's status, check out this site:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/state/
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Ray Berthiaume
So the cost is the determining factor? How about War? What are the chances of banning war?
Can't you see the advantages of unbridaled capitalism? During "chimpy's bonanza", that wild wild west speculation binge on each and every commodity from corn to copper to credit, during that gilded petro-profiteering, war profiteering, disaster profiteering, colluding, monopolizing, dumping, plundering, polluting frenzy, we could afford to kill our petty criminals! God Bless the United States of America!