Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Mugged then Shot
“The United States has been a leader in the multinational effort to end bribery and corruption in international business practices."
--Website of The U.S. State Department
If absolute power corrupts absolutely, why shouldn’t the United States be the most corrupt (and corrupting) country on earth? We’re number one! In America, each politician can be bought and absurd sums of money are routinely misallocated or missing altogether, with nary a peep from the complicit media. On the foreign front, America’s modus operandi is to bribe every dictator, and the ones she can’t bribe, she’ll undermine, overthrow or bomb back to Jesus. In exchange for this bribe, which can be disguised as loans or “foreign assistance,” said dictator will allow America to loot his country in perpetuity. If you don’t believe me, just strip any tinpot dictator and you’ll surely find “CIA” tattooed on one ass cheek, with a (pretty good) portrait of a recent U.S. president embossed on the other. Lovers always leave a mark, they often say. Sometimes it’s not a dictator, per se, but a dominant party that’s America’s hushed puppy. In any case, rapacious trade deals and unpayable loans are the bane of countless client states orbiting Washington.
Domestically, American corruption has been institutionalized as campaign contributions and lobbying, but that’s only the open, legal part. Perhaps these practices are allowed to trick us into thinking that American corruption only goes so far, but who really knows what goes on in the labyrinthine backrooms, basements and dungeons of Washington? In any case, us lumpen Americans are “represented” by millionaire politicians who are lint deep in the pockets of the fattest banks and corporations. The American politician is thoroughly corrupt, often from grassroots level, but the degree of venality and sanctimonious hypocrisy increase as he approaches Washington DC, that beautiful cesspool of martial madness.
No candidate who’s not heavily pro big business, overtly or covertly, can have any chance of being elected to national office. He won’t be funded, nor will he be seen on television. It’s not a democracy when all candidates are vetted beforehand, and only millionaires can be chosen by other millionaires and billionaires. In this setup, the average citizen doesn’t matter, as his vote or canvassing for a favorite are only charades designed to make him feel good and involved, as if his opinions and advocacy matter, but whatever he does, it won’t prevent the election of yet another tool who’s corrupt, pro war and pro big business, at the expense of all else. But don’t despair, all you earnest partisans, for even when your candidate does lose, the other guy, one who’s hardly different than your favorite man, wins! Those who voted for McCain, for example, got pretty much all of his policies through Obama, so it’s a win, win, lose, lose situation, see? Emblematic of this farce is the fact that American tax payers are even asked to contribute three bucks a year to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. Though stuffed with cash from Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Raytheon, etc., our candidates still panhandle from poor schmucks whom they will soon rip off anyway.
American politicians may differ on personal and ethical matters such as school prayer, gay marriage and abortion, but on all the major, lucrative issues affecting the military industrial complex or big business, they are remarkably uniform. Our senators and congressmen also behave like trained seals when it comes to Israel. Witness the 29 standing ovations a packed House gave Netanyahu recently. Whether Democrat or Republican, each was terrified to be caught sitting as his colleagues jumped up and barked.
Your rep sure knows who his daddy is, and it ain’t you, sucker! The primary job of the American politician, from Obama on down, is to spin and disguise an endless series of corporate and military crimes he’s enabling. Which brings us to the Pentagon. No other governmental organ is more gluttonously corrupt. The Pentagon’s main function is not defending America but to bleed this country dry to enrich Halliburton, Lockheed/Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman and the rest. Over and over again, the Pentagon has put hundreds of thousands of Americans in harm’s way, just so its masters can make a handsome profit. To feed these insatiable ogres, the Pentagon is willing to destroy American itself, and it is doing so, right now.
Beside bloody business as usual, billions of dollars often go missing from the Pentagon cash register without any explanation whatsoever, and in 2001, Donald Rumsfeld even admitted that $2.3 trillion had disappeared, which he blamed on sloppy accounting. So it’s not thievery or corruption, but merely inept arithmetic. Tamping down this scandal, the mainstream media seemed to agree.
But perhaps we do have a math problem. We are a people who clip 25 cent coupons, drive (an SUV) a mile to save a buck, register with subtle satisfaction the missing penny from a $19.99 price tag, yet these stolen trillions leave us unfazed. One reason for this, I think, is that American corruption is not experienced directly, face to face, as it is in many other countries. Most Americans have never been browbeaten and shaken down by a corrupt cop, clerk or judge, so we can pretend that corruption doesn’t hurt us. Washington has also been waging wars without raising taxes, so it’s no skin off my back, many Americans are thinking, but our bellicose policy overseas is certainly bankrupting the homeland, even as it increases our insecurity in future blowbacks. The constant hike in our money supply, devaluing our dollars, is also a form of hidden taxation.
Another reason for our passivity in the face of widespread corruption is the state of our media, which routinely hype trivial stories while suppressing much greater outrages. Thus, the money John Edwards spent on his mistress, a million dollars provided by two private donors, was discussed for a week by television and newspaper “pundits,” but no one is concerned about the $1.5 million of tax money wasted each time Washington fires a Tomahawk missile at Libya. How many thousands have been launched so far in this three-month war? No one knows, and no one seems to care about the real flesh and bones on the receiving end of those weapons. “Bad guys” deserve to die, and so do “collateral damages.” Even as they mug us, our masters speak to us as if we’re morons. As they gobble up the entire world and everyone’s future, we get to nibble on catch phrases and slogans
Like Pavlov’s dogs, Americans have been conditioned to salivate at the sound of a home run, a Lady Gaga’s burp and the promise of hope and change comes election time, but when that fat, familiar hand reaches into our wallet, yet again, we feel nothing. We’re cool and blasé until it’s our turn to receive the pink slip, be evicted, then having to curl up in our car or on cardboard.
Interviewed by Stud Terkels, retired congressman C. Wright Patman said in 1970, “A dictatorship could spring up here over night, if this country got so bad. If another Depression came, we’d have a revolution. People wouldn’t take it any more. They have more knowledge. The big ones, they’d be looking for somebody that’d have the power to just kill people, if they didn’t agree. When John Doe begins to get up, they’d just go down and shoot him.”
I’m not sure that we have more knowledge, but with a presidency that can wage wars without congress or popular approval, and that can imprison or kill any American citizen without due process, a dictatorship is certainly here. Ditto, that Depression.
In a productive economy, corruption is less glaring because there are so many legitimate ways to enrich oneself, but in an increasingly non-productive one, such as what we have now, corruption becomes the primary means to riches. As we starve and kill each other, the mega corporations and their servants, our politicians, will continue to fatten themselves through their access to power.
In a ghetto with no stores, only drug corners, any bling-bling dude steering a loud Hummer is viewed suspiciously (or with admiration), so in this nation of fewer and fewer factories, save those that make bombs, tanks and high-grade weapons, who are our biggest death pushers and pimps, and what should we do about them?


80 Comments so far
Show AllThis country is dead, it just hasn't stopped moving yet .....
Like a chicken with its head cut off, runnng all over the yard.
More like a cinematic zombie.
a zombified headless chicken?
Isn't she running for President?
A vivid portrait of the nightmare of US empire. Anyone see a creative way out of this or must it simply rot and decay and collapse from all the diseases Linh Dinh so articulately describes?? And can anything new and humane arise from such a toxic and vile morass? Or must evolution move on with the ages until other life forms develop and time will slowly detoxify this mess?
yes there is a way out of this mess deep and wide though it may be
linh also didn't talk about the state of education and medicine and pollution of the drinking water and food systems - but he can only talk about so much at one time
what he has described is a carefully built prison system - envisioned by the rothschilds/rockefeller debt slave banking system over 100 years ago
the whole psyop has been written about extensively by its leading practitioners from henry kissinger to aldous huxley and everyone in between
there aren't many secrets - they envisioned and have realized their plan of dumbing down the population, poisoning them with gmo's and other chemicals in the food supply, destroying critical thinking in their mindnumbing school system, and using their controlled media to denigrate working people so as to reduce their worth, their wages, pensions, benefits and rights
they have achieved many of these goals and are working daily on the rest
they have used tv as a mass mind control mechanism that has been very effective
so here we are - in debt, making very little money, no rights, under a fascist government, predated upon by terrorist banksters who own the politicians blasting us with corporate media gruel - roaming around the world killing every peasant we can get our mitts on
here is the solution - get the fuck out of the prison
1. pay off your debts - even if you have to cut back on everything you think of as extras
2. buy good food
3. turn off the fucking tv - it is shit wrapped in barf and it ruins your life one half hour at a time
4. read a few books and learn the history of the country and the world
5. get fit, or fitter
6. challenge yourself to regain your dignity
7. get the fuck out on the street and demand some real change
these things would help
one last thing - linh mentions that rummy "discovered" the trillions of missing dollars at the pentagon and vowed to never sleep until the money was found and recovered from whoever stole it
the date he made that announcement: september 10, 2001
the next day - 9/11 - everything changed as they tell us and we haven't heard diddly shit about that money since
can you say psyop....
shout out linh
Medmed, I would add another suggestion: Pack your grip and get the hell out of the urban theme parks we call cities.
I dont know about that. The only like-minded people organizing and working for progress are in the cities. It's hard to demand the change we need in the middle of the woods - and if you try it in a small town, you will only irritate some people.
Rural areas and small towns have some pretty scary right wing politics - backed with their guns. I don't feel safe there.
Despite what you say, the folks who despise and distrust Washington most and are more likely to do something to bring it down are the exact folks you speak of.
Put all the petty stuff aside and you have people (largely urban) that will parade, sing and dance about a problem, and those who, when really pissed-off about something, will deal will it seriously.
I say if anything is done to bring down Washington, it'll come from the folks out in the rural areas. Far fetched, but if they ever put 2+2 together and figure out this patriot/war mongering lie is just that, a lie and a ruse, they'll be some changes made.
I think it's a good chance its gonna be a civil war: the Urbanites against the Rurals. Washington will side with the Urbanites using everything they've built over the last 10 years enforce their police state. Cities can be largely protected and they're already on board with detention centers and central policing operations.
But in many ways, Urbanites are weak. And they lack one important thing: food. Washington and the Pentagon will seek to control the larger agricultural areas to feed its cities with tanks, drones, etc., while Ruralites wage a guerrilla style war.
Of course, I could be entirely wrong. :)
Where are the rural and small town people when we plan our mass protests and direct actions - including property actions against capitalist institutions and the cops at the G-20 in Pittsburgh and Toronto? We really could have used you country folk's help - but you were nowhere to be seen. Oh, I stand corrected - most of the cops borrowed for the event from a multi-state area were country-folk!
And it is clear from your piece that you have never actually been to a city. As far as food, we don't want the GMO and pesticide laden crap from a continent away the great majority of rural people provide us. It was only when I moved to the city did I learn of public-stall markets, farmers markets, Italian grocers, and CSA farms in the counties immediately outside the city - and urban vegatable farms too.
Having grown up in a rural area in Minnesota and having lived in Mexico City, Minneapolis, Seattle, Seoul, and Chicago, to say "Where are the rural and small town people when we plan our mass protests and direct actions....." Answer: Probably standing right next to you, but you didn't bother to ask.
pjd412, "Where are the rural small town when we plan our mass protests" I am one of those rural small towners. I have written and performed protest songs, carried flag draped coffins(which I built) down the streets of Seattle to protest the war, see: Quilcene tea party on you tube for some small town action. "We really could have used country folk help" Really! Most people live in cities or burbs. Aren't there enough of you to take care of business. City folk come out here to recreate, retire, and ravage. You only learned of public markets when you came to the city!? Were you raised in a cave by a pack of wild corn dogs?
Do we really get anything out of savaging the non-urban folk, P?
I'm a city kid too, and it's not hard to see (if only because nearly all apartments and homeless shelters are in cities) that the poorest members of the working class live in cities, not the burbs or the countryside. Nearly anyone who has a bit of land is better off than those who don't, even if the landowner lives in a shack.
On the other hand, historically it hasn't been the truly poor who've driven change, but the ones a few levels up, who can see what's going on and have enough freedom in their lives to take action. Which is one of the reasons the scum are trying to remove that freedom from us all.
It seems to me that if we want to produce more than splashy feel-good demos and other theater, we've to be organisers. Which means finding and illuminating common ground, not differences. Doesn't it?
Without the rural areas your concrete theme parks would crumble into dust. M y small unincorporated town has no gas station,(twenty miles away) stop lights or ghettoes. We live with nature, not recreationally, but as a lifestyle. In my neck of the woods we are seeking ways to preserve the natural environment, often from city folk who retire out here and wish to bring their vices and retail garbage outlets with them. I can walk ouround my neighborhoods any our of the day or night without fear. In Seattle, the nearest large urban area, downtown after dark is scary whatever your politics. "
"if you try it in a small town you will only irritate some people" Your generalization is as insulting as it is ignorant. Maybe you should spend more time in the woods. They say it's a great cure for biggotry.
In Seattle, the nearest large urban area, downtown after dark is scary whatever your politics. "
And what are you afraid of? It appears that you are getting your information about the city from the racism-tinged, sensationalist 6 O'Clock news.
As far as irritating people. We will plan a single-payer heaalthcare or antiwar march, or maybe even a gay-rights march, in say, Kitanning, PA and I'll report back how it goes. If rural areas are progressive, why are they source for the great majority of the elected, flying-monkey right?
And by your use of "concrete theme park" it is obvious that you have never been in an actual neighborhood of a functioning city - of which freeway-and-car choked, public-transit-less Seattle is not a particularly good example.
pjd, "it appears you get your info on the 6:00 news" And you from "Deliverence"
Cities exist and grow because they can be fed daily. Not to be afraid in the city, there are lots of police, surveilance cameras, and you'd be surprised how many people you see on the street or in their cars, men and women who are packing firearms in their belt or purse or underneath the seat of their car. I wonder what they are afraid of? Likely an invasion of rural rowdies. Alas.
Both on the job (mine safety) and off ((hang gliding - which entails dealing with landowners on a formal (maintaining the launch and designated landing field) or ad-hoc (landing unannounced in a field after a cross-country flight)) I am in rural areas a lot. And in the cases where politics or social issues come up, the people there espouse right-wing and racist views - to a person.
Your are either having bad luck with your landing zones or a bigot . Probably a bit of both. Sounds like someone who sees rural America as your little playground.
Okay, try again. (My last post evaporated into thin air as it was being typed???)
I live in a small town in of all places, East Texas. Yep, this town has more churches than convenience stores, billboards saying "Praise Jesus", and is most definately very conservative. But....
These folks are starting (finally) to see the corruption that infects our entire system of governance. Being in the south, of course some dislike Obama because of his color, but a surprizing number voted for him as well in 2008. They're pissed because Obama lied to them on a grand scale and became Baby Bu$h's third term. (Note: Even in the little towns in the south, the racial prejudices lie mostly in the older generations. From the Boomer generation and on, most welcome other races without any thought to the contrary.)
These people as well as those from the big cities are very well aware of the stench of corruption our government emits, from the local level all the way up to Obama. Sure, many of these folks are quite uneducated. The key to gaining their support is to be the first to impress them with an agenda which they believe will make positive change. This is what the astroturf teabaggers did. They saw the problem and had to stop it before it became a threat to the status quo, which the teaparty did quite well at. We on the left failed miserably by losing the support of these people. The fascists saw an opportunity to fool the uneducated and took advantage of that, and guess what? It worked.
Now the same people, after what has happened in the rust belt states with their new teaparty governors, have seen that once again they have been betrayed.
What we on the left need to strive for is gaining the confidence of these small town conservatives. They are exceedingly friendly people. The problem that separates the rural people from the urban dwellers is a totally different living environment.
I have lived in medium to small towns most of my life. The possession of guns, a blue collar or trade type workforce is the norm, religion gives these people peace from the turmoil of low incomes, but they are also the first to help if you are down. These people love their neighbors as family and will do anything to help anyone with a friendly face. They are honest and hard working, and yes, they care about the future for their children.
This is a population that if it understood the goals of the progressive would be on board in a heartbeat. We on the left are as skeptical of them as they are of us. There is a great big misunderstanding by both sides and we have to learn to tolerate their beliefs in religion and other things foreign to us, because I see that as the only barrier between a strong support group or an opponent.
These people share most of the same values progressives do. The right wing noise machine has convinced this particular group of people that the left is composed of intolerant, God hating commies that are totally intolerant of anything other than taking away their freedom to own guns and go to church. We need to convince them that we mean nothing of the sort, that what we *RESPECT* is freedom, for everyone.
They are generally very empathetic and caring, and once a friend always a friend. They know how to survive as well. What they lack is a quality education, which is of course why the fascists seek to curb spending on education. A populace that learns to think critically is very dangerous to their renslavement ideology. When people learn to realise who their oppressors are, they tend to put elite heads on pikes.
Sorry, I know I got off on a soapbox by preaching what we are missing out on, but trust me, though many are uneducated, when presented with a logical choice (just leave God out of the conversation by being neutral) they will use common sense and make the right choice.
Peace to all of my urban and rural friends:)
I lived for a while in Texas and can relate to some of what you say. While I felt they had some odd ideas there what can you expect from people who have never gone more than 50 miles from where they were born and who are pumped full of ideology from churches and newsporn from the MSM? I generally enjoyed their great sense of humour and while I felt they were far too paranoid they would mostly be the types to help you if you needed it.
If only they could get to see the rest of the world and get a better perspective on life they'd be more rounded and gentler people. Sadly, they were mostly far too insular.
"A populace that learns to think critically is very dangerous to their enslavement ideology."
We have the same problem in Canada. Here's a Canadian senator, Mike Duffy:
"In March 2010 Duffy criticized the University of King's College and other journalism schools in Canada for teaching Noam Chomsky and critical thinking. He went on to say that journalism schools in Canada were churning out leftists who thought private enterprise was bad. The head of King's School of Journalism reacted with surprise to Duffy's criticism, saying that Manufacturing Consent was not part of the curriculum. She also said she would not apologize for teaching critical thinking to journalism students"
Taken from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Duffy
To me, teaching critical thinking is the single most desirable learning skill beyond survival. That and throwing away TV sets which are sadly the subtle de facto equivalent of the 1984 'Ministry of Truth' beaming propaganda into all homes.
We are starting to get Fox (Faux) style "News" in Canada. Here's a disgusting example, watch the calculated and predatory ambush and bellowing rant that takes place against a very gracious dancer (all part of the Harper Con regime attack on Arts & Culture -the interviewer is an arm of the Con regime):
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/search/dance/a-lack-of-compassion/971454253001
Fortunately there has been a public outcry and over 4000 complaints to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council, so all is not lost yet:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/complaints-about-sun-news-interpretive-dance-interview-overwhelm-watchdog/article2078995/
Nice retort:
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1017002--mallick-meet-sun-tv-s-venom-for-hire-krista-erickson
Being nice to people you know (and are of the same ethnicity/race) is easy, and not very important. It is being nice to people you dont know that is more important.
Why do all the most savage right-wingers in Pennsylvania (and pressumably wWsconsin, Michigan and Ohio too) represent, and are elected by, rural and small-town districts?
As as far as "freedom" this is so slippery a word that using it is useless. By their definition of "freedom" we can never have single-payer helthcare, or a social safety net of any kind - or anti-discrimination laws, or environmental protection laws. All these things are manifestly "anti-freedom" as your friends define the word.
"Rural areas and small towns have some pretty scary right wing politics-backed with their guns". Amen to that buddy. I live in a place just like that and you are right. And you "better" agree with their politics or else..
I moved out to rural North Dakota from living in St. Paul, Mn all my life. I married a man out here and wanted to move way out in the country because I love nature and animals so much I wanted to live closer to nature. Well, guess what? No one else out here loves and respects animals and nature. The only animals they love are the cattle and sheep they raise for money. Everything else--BANG you're dead. The only good raccoon, skunk, coyote, badger, deer, duck goose is a DEAD one. A good example of that is what happened when I got a coyote for a pet. And here in N.D., there is NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD COYOTE. Anyway, I got a year old coyote that had been hand raised in captivity from a guy who couldn't keep her. I had her for one month and a nosey red-neck neighbor of mine found out about it and turned me into the game warden. In North Dakota it is against the law to have a coyote for a pet.----but, you can kill all the coyotes you want. Anyway, they came out and took her from me and euthanized her because "by law" that's what they have to do if they confiscate a wild animal that is illegal. I begged them to take her to a zoo, but they said by law they couldn't. If that wasn't bad enough, they came back a few days ago and told me that if I wouldn't tell them who I got her from, I could be in even bigger trouble---even possibly facing federal charges if I got her from somebody outside the state. I told them I will never tell where I got her from no matter what. I feel that the ultimate price was paid by the poor innocent coyote (and I will have to live with that for the rest of my life). I told them I will go to jail if I have to but I won't tell--and I won't pay a fine, either. I am a 66 yr old nurse that works for the state of North Dakota at the North Dakota State Hospital. I have never broken a law in my life before I got the coyote. They are treating me like a drug-dealing, illegal - alien - hiding criminal. I am getting ready to retire, and I may be spending some of my retirement in jail. So much for rural life.
Keeping a coyote is a crime because it's a wild animal. It is not a pet. It is cruel to keep such an animal as one. I don't think you should go to jail for that, but ... Sorry that I can't empathize with you on this issue. If they took the coyote to a zoo, that would only have encouraged other idiots to keep wild critters as if they could be pets. Pets are pets because we've spent the last few thousand years domesticating them.
Rural people do value wildlife, and yes, that includes using them for food. Which is what they are for. They're just not idiotically romantic about them as they get to live in closer proximity to them.
Excuse me; it's cruel to keep a coyote as a pet? In what way is it cruel? She was as tame as a dog. She was raised up from a tiny pup around people. The only crime is that she couldn't run loose and become fodder for the jerks out here that like to shoot them. The guy that called the game warden kills them all the time, and leaves them laying out in his back yard. It probably pissed him off because that was one less coyote for him to kill. If I had known the game warden was coming the day they took her, and I had shot her in her kennel, they would have come and seen her dead and turned around and left. It is legal to have possession of a dead coyote, but not a live one. By the way, do rural people eat coyotes?
It's not a pet. It should not be cooped up in someone's home. Yes, it is more cruel to keep such an animal as a pet than it is to let the thing starve to death in the wild. Sorry if that offends your city bred sensitivities, but that's what life is. At least that's life in the back country.
I can't agree with Saturnalia that it's more cruel to adopt a non-human than let it starve in 'freedom', and I'm very sorry that your coyote friend was executed.
But I have to think a coyote would be more a danger to those around it than a dog is, and we know that dogs are dangerous. Cats - or at least f. silv. lybica cats - are believed to have chosen to live with us, and there are no credible reports of them ever voluntarily being a serious danger to humans. But the same isn't true of dogs.
When I think of supporting someone like a coyote, I think of Charla Nash, who had her eyes gouged out, and part of her face and hands ripped off by the 'tame' chimp her friend had supported for years. Coyotes aren't chimps, of course, but they're not cats either, or even dogs.
"Rural people do value wildlife, and yes, that includes using them for food. Which is what they are for."
Your utilitarian point of view concerning wildlife (using them for food because thats what they are for) is one of the reasons of the upcoming ecological catastrophe/apocalypse/doom.
Im dissapointed that you think like that, animals dont exist to satisfy human needs.
All life is sacred, the life of the coyote is just as valuable as that of the warden who killed it. Anthropocentrism is an egotistical delusion to justify the unjustiifiable.
I also think we're here for the other critters to eat. I've asked not to be embalmed, so that my corpse will nourish other creatures. We EVOLVED to hunt those animals, so yes, that's what we do. The problem is that there are too many of us, and the only way to reduce our population is not very appealing, is it now?
I don't think critters exist for our needs, but we do coexist in ways that satisfy the needs of life on the planet.
As for the coyote, after being befriended by humans it had a death sentence imposed. Not by the game warden, but the idiot human who thought she could make a friend from an animal that is not domesticable. If we let nature take its course, we'd all be in a much better world.
"...but the idiot human who thought she could make a friend..."
Wow. I can not think of appropriate words to describe what a shitty, mean spirited creature you have represented yourself to be
Thanks. bite me
Very nice post, medmedude!!! Not many people would ever do the things you suggest [except whackos like me who have already done them] because of the addiction to that damn idiot box and to burning fossil fuels for fun. The true horror is that if 40% of the population actually did as you [and I ] suggest, the situation would be well on its way to resolution.
Does it really make sense to link Henry Kissenger and Aldous Huxley? I don't think either of them would think that.
This Man's consistent writing Brilliance elicits the genius tag.
Spot-on stuff, as usual, from Linh Dinh. I don't think there was a single sentence I didn't agree with, and I really like his turns of phrase.
Strange, though, that he mentions Rumsfeld's announcement of the missing $2.3 trillion at the Pentagon, mentions even the press's burial of this story, but doesn't mention that Rumsfeld's announcement came THE DAY BEFORE 9/11, and that the aircraft that hit the Pentagon struck the very offices where these accounting records were supposedly held.
Seeing that Linh Dinh is usually not one to pull his punches, was the connection between the missing $2.3 trillion and 9/11 perhaps edited out of his piece?
Hi Clovis,
It wasn't edited out, but in an article where I directly raised questions about 9/11, Dissident Voice, Intrepid Report and Information Clearing House were the only places that would publish it:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26350.htm
Hey CD, how about a retrofit publication of Linh's piece? His writing is consistently amongst the most appreciated and commented here, rightly so. Disappointed it wasn't here, especially as it is more recent than one might suppose, given the topic.
No surprise there.
Keep up the great work Linh Dinh, your vision is impeccable.
http://kiely-flashpoint.blogspot.com/
As more information is received, it's becoming clear to me that 9/11 was meticulously planned and immediately capitalized on.
Linh Dinh, excellent stuff!
Love your work. I assume that you would trust the CD posters to fill in the details on that 2.3 trillion.
Thanks for the link, Linh, I'll definitely check it out. And thanks for joining the discussion. You're doing great work.
I just read "Collapsing America," from your link: nice work! Too bad pointing out the obvious is frowned upon.
Great article. Thanks for the link.
Linh Dinh,
When I read your work, it's like you are reading my mind but with a vocabulary I don't possess.
Thank you, sir.
Hi Mr. Linh,
If I remember correctly, someone here linked your article from ICH in a comment on another article, about the same time it came out. It may have even been on another article of yours. I know I read that article to which you refer, and I am pretty sure I read it as a result of someone here linking it, mainly because I come to this site far more frequently than I do those other sites. Regardless, it was an excellent piece, as is this one, and I would recommend everyone reading it.
Thank you again for your eloquent and witty prose. They always make my day! : )
John
Also what has been buried (you may be able to find a cached copy of Time magazine from that July) are the statements by Rummy and a few other of the major players that they were no longer going to be taking commercial airline flights, just as a precaution mind you, in response to the information they were provided about possible terrorist attacks involving commercial airliners being rammed into buildings.
Duplicate post deleted.
Nothing left to say, again. I am more impressed each time I read Mr. Dinh.
Populaton 1910 on the planet Earth: about 1.9 billion
Populaton 2010 on the planet Earth: about 7 billion
Which resources will we run out of first, second, third, etc. How about solving aging [Alan Harrington's The Immortalist] and finding a way to arrive at another planet in another solar system [Robert Heinlein "Methuselah's Children]?
Then we can start this whole thing described above by Linh Dinh again!
A thousand years in our evolution divides the two dates. Why with all the tremendous gains in technology can't our world support another 5 billion people, especially since, 1% of the population have gained way more in monetary equations than 5 billion dollars in one year, and way more in the world live on way less than even 1000.00 per year. What exactly is holding up the progess. I am thinking it's not the poor folks.