Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Too Big to Jail
This week the financial crisis finally went prime time in the form of a big budget HBO docudrama called “Too Big To Fail.”
Goldman Sach's Lloyd Blankfein. (File)
It was a well-acted docudrama focused on the BIG men and some women in the banks and in government who tried to put Humpty Dumpty back together again up on that wall to prevent a total economic collapse when panic dried up credit and financial institutions faced failure.
Based on the work of a New York Times reporter, it offered a skillfully-made but conventional narrative which, like most TV shows, showcase events but miss their deeper context and background.
We heard all the explanations, save one.
There was greed, ambition, ego and money lust. There were personal rivalries and ideological battles, parochial agendas and narrow self-interest. There was panic on THE Street and in the halls of mighty institutions. In many ways, the program recycled and made an official narrative compelling viewing. In the end, everyone was to blame so no one was to blame.
But... what was missing was any notion of intentionality and premeditation, almost no mention of systemic fraud and CRIME, that one word that sums up what really happened for those millions of Americans who have lost jobs and homes. We never saw victims or felt their pain and bewilderment. We were never shown how a shadow banking system emerged or how the finance industry worked with their counterparts in finance and insurance to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the superrich,
When I was but a precocious lad, my elementary school encouraged students to take out a savings account at the nearby Dime Bank in the Bronx. We were each given a bankbook and taught to put in $.50 a week to show us how to build wealth by being thrifty. It was with a sense of pride that I watched my balance grow.
It may have been peanuts in the scheme of things, but to me, at the time, it was the way to plan for the future.
At the same time, in those year I watched TV shows glamorize the bank robbing antics of a man named Willie Sutton who also staged jail breaks wearing masks and costumes. When he was asked why he robbed banks, he responded famously, “That’s where the money is.”
And it still is, except in our era, it is the banks that are robbing us.
That’s because what’s now called the “financial Services sector” has gone from about 30 percent of our economy to over 60 percent. Through a process called financialization, they have transformed how all business is done.
Making money from money soon began to surpass making money from making things. What we were never warned about was the danger of getting too deeply in debt, or how the economy was shifting from production to consumption.
Private equity, credit swaps, derivative deals and collateralized debt obligations soon drove the economy. Markets became captives of high performance trading by powerful computers.
When Wall Street became the defacto capital of the country, the bankers accrued more power than the politicians who they bought up with impunity. Their lobbying power deregulated the economy and decriminalized their activities. They killed many of the reforms enacted during the New Deal designed to protect the public. They built a shadow (and shadowy) banking system beyond the reach of the law.
And now, here we are, in 2011, five years after the meltdown of 2007, four years after the crash of 2008 and the passage of the TARP bailout that pumped money into their treasuries at taxpayer expense. Since then, there has been a steady parade of scandals and the disclosures that have come out since. Every week, more banks close and or consolidate and run into problems with regulators.
Take “my” old bank in the Bronx. It has been through as many changes as I have been. A website on bank histories runs it down:
Dime Savings Bank of New York, The
04/12/1859 NYS Chartered Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn
09/10/1930 Acquire By Merger Navy Savings Bank
06/30/1970 Name Change To Dime Savings Bank of New York, The
09/30/1979 Acquire By Merger Mechanics Exchange Savings Bank
07/01/1980 Acquire By Merger First Federal S & L Assoc. of Port Washington
08/01/1981 Acquire By Merger Union Savings Bank of New York
06/23/1983 Convert Federal Dime Savings Bank of NY, FSB
01/07/2002 Purchased By Washington Mutual Inc.
01/07/2002 Name Change To Washington Mutual Bank
And then, of course, some years later, Washington Mutual itself, went bust and was bought up for a song by JP Morgan Chase. Here are some of the latest headlines about the bank now known as WAMU:
WaMu agrees on post-bankruptcy control -- report - Reuters
WaMu, Shareholders, Biggest Creditors Said to Settle ... - Bloomberg
WaMu shareholders are offered $25M-plus to drop claims
On the day I wrote this commentary, the New York Times reported:
“The nation’s biggest banks and mortgage lenders have steadily amassed real estate empires, acquiring a glut of foreclosed homes that threatens to deepen the housing slump and create a further drag on the economic recovery.
All told, they own more than 872,000 homes as a result of the groundswell in foreclosures, almost twice as many as when the financial crisis began in 2007, according to RealtyTrac.”
And to whom does the Times turn for expertise on the subject, but a key former operative at Washington Mutual who was with the bank in the go-go era of shoveling out subprime mortgages? Now, he gives advice on risk management:
“These shops are under siege; it’s just a tsunami of stuff coming in,” said Taj Bindra, who oversaw Washington Mutual’s servicing unit from 2004 to 2006 and now advises financial institutions on risk management. “Lenders have a strong incentive to clear out inventory in a controlled and timely manner, but if you had problems on the front end of the foreclosure process, it should be no surprise you are having problems on the back end.”
What were people’s homes are now “inventory” to be stockpiled even though it has a negative cumulative effect on economic recovery of the housing market.
The banks that are increasingly despised and blamed for their role in engineering the financial disaster, are now trying to play nice to change their negative image.
Explains the Times:
“Conscious of their image, many lenders have recently started telling real estate agents to be more lenient to renters who happen to live in a foreclosed home and give them extra time to move out before changing the locks.
“Wells Fargo has sent me back knocking on doors two or three times, offering to give renters money if they cooperate with us,” said Claude A. Worrell, a longtime real estate agent from Minneapolis who specializes in selling bank-owned property. “It’s a lot different than it used to be.”
So, they are still foreclosing, but with a smile. Is it a ‘lot different than it used to be’?
Just last month, Huffington Post reported:
“Top executives at Washington Mutual actively boosted sales of high-risk, toxic mortgages in the two years prior to the bank's collapse in 2008, according to emails published in a wide-ranging Senate report that contradicts previous public testimony about the meltdown.
The voluminous, 639-page report on the financial crisis from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations singles out Washington Mutual for its decision to champion its subprime lending business, even as executives privately acknowledged that a housing bubble was about to burst.”
The truth is that most of the bigger banks have emerged from the financial crisis stronger than ever, with executives cashing in with higher salaries and bigger bonuses. That old saying about criminals who “laughed all the way to the bank” has to be revised because in this case they never left the bank.
More shocking has been the largely passive response by our government and prosecutors. At last, the Attorney General of New York is said to be investigating but none of the big bankers have yet gone to jail or suffered for the scams and frauds they committed. Most of the State officials who vowed to after the banks in the absence of aggressive federal actions have backed down.
So what can “we the people” do? We can do nothing and watch more of what’s left of our wealth vanish, or we can join others in demanding a “jailout,” not a bailout.
A well-known international banker was just arrested for a high profile alleged sex crime but not one of possibly thousands have been prosecuted for well documented financial crimes.
Where are the political leaders and activist groups willing to “fight the power” and demand accountability and transparency on Wall Street?
Why are so many us banking on a financial recovery to bring back jobs and a modicum of justice created by the very people and institutions responsible for the crisis?
And why didn’t I learn about these dangers when I first discovered the wonderful world of banking? Isn’t that what schools are for?




32 Comments so far
Show AllExactly, I love the last sentence! "Isn't that what schools are for?" Not in this system!
ed griffin has written a good book on how the rockefeller/rothschild debt slave machine took over the medical and educational systems in the early 1900's
they now control the banking system, food system, resources, education systems, medical systems in our country and increasingly the world
why aren't we learning about that
why don't we learn about cold fusion, free energy
why is it that no one understands (or even knows about) the electro-magnetic spectrum
its called dumbing down
here http://www.rense.com/general75/pass.htm is a grade 8 civic test from 1954 - probably no one could pass it today
duh!
danny talks about how the bankers are using a movie to clean up their image - how about the zionist turd zuckerman over at facebook and his "social network" crap
the sheeple have been conditioned to watch tv and to believe
no one is going to say shit about it - if they were gonna do it they would have done it by now
Simply put, it is a successful wealth transfer scheme that will result in 1% of the population owning everything.
Most Americans will call you a conspiracy theorist if you talk about this stuff.
After listening to the author promote this blame the victims, exonerate the perpetrators movie on NPR's Marketplace program yesterday evening, there was no way I was going to watch it.
You Bet, and all the republican talking points are coming straight from Rupert Merdoch! I wonder how many investers, becides myself Faux Business Channel has lost due to their strident Winner or Loser attidute, Being on the loser side my AIG nor my CITI stock pay dividends. I'm supposed to wait 50yrs for the rates to come up,, At my age!
Yes! JailOut not BailOut!!
>^^<
By contrast with the author's teacher, my daughter had a teacher who taught the students to put their money in the stock market. I suppose that is not a bad plan if you understand the risks, but personally, I guess I'm just not a good capitalist. I've always found it just a bit repulsive to fork over my cash to the nihilism of profit above all else in the typical corporate machine.
Indeed!
"And why didn’t I learn about these dangers when I first discovered the wonderful world of banking? Isn’t that what schools are for?"
Every kid in this nation should get a basic schooling on the Media, Consumerism & Banking. (But we knot that's not going to happen, at least in public schools.)
Excellent points but I am under the impression that this financial collapse was engineered. In the Bronx this collapse has hit the poor very hard but it has speeded up gentrification, the people who were not at fault are leaving the Bronx in droves. The buildings are being remolded and a new class is being ushered in. Moore documented this collapse well in his film, "Capitalism a love story" where he called for a mass movement but either the people are too afraid or too lazy either way unless the masses take action the poor will simply be displaced and the wealthy will wallow in their wealth while the poor and middle class see their final days.
US financial history includes at least one engineered collapse each decade from 1776 until FDR's New Deal resulted in more than a half century (1935-1987) of relative financial stability where you had recessions in the business cycle that were resolved by adjusting interest rates and money supply.
Financial industry decriminalization (commonly called deregulation) started in 1978 and by 2001 had dismantled most of the New Deal financial industry regulations that enabled fifty years of stability. Since 1987 we have experienced a series of engineered financial collapses, with each one affecting the working class more severely than the previous one.
Too-big-to-fail banksters forecast collapses will occur every 5 to 7 years in the current and future financial environment where only a few token regulations, and no meaningful regulations exist.
Well it worked for one bankster, Everybody should file rape charges against all the major banksters,, we'll git'em one way or another1
>^^<
Sure feels like rape, or at least molestation of my pension!
Laughing all around inside the bank. While ruining lives and killing democracy.
they produce nothing, simply implement "financial systems" that let them take more and more of the wealth.
but also
and they profit from ignoring climate change
wars and the military industrial complex
jailiing people in the privatized prison industrial complex
scam on line for profit schools that in a few short years not eat of 25% of of the student aid budgeted for higher education
Does the government or wall street or anyone else have a REAL plan to get people back to work?
It isn't part of their agenda. "Real" jobs aren't coming back, and they haven't finished destroying all of the "good" jobs, YET.
They have yet to start privatizing everything!! By 2020 we'll select our president by cellphone on Americon Idol!
Congress will have been outsourced to India by then, more efficient!... or we could just heve a pay-per-view lobbiest death match!
>^^<
Yes they do, but it will involve repealing the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
"We heard all the explanations, save one."
At least the top left gatekeepers felt the crisis necessary enough for a limited hangout, implying at least someone at that level doesn't think they're invulnerable.
"Why are so many us banking on a financial recovery to bring back jobs and a modicum of justice created by the very people and institutions responsible for the crisis?"
I am not. Can't really speak for anyone else. This morning I awoke to the news that businesses that had received stimulus money had back taxes owed. Nothing has changed.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43143064/ns/business-us_business/t/report-says-tax-cheats-received-stimulus-money/
While Ireland celebrates Obama's Irish ancestory I wonder if they are aware that the austerity measures they face directly relate to how his administration has approached the crisis?
Private equity, credit swaps, derivative deals, collateralized debt obligations, shadow banking systems, subprime lending—how many of these terms do you think most US citizens, even “educated” ones, understand? How many understand financial, corporate, and tax laws, quagmires of obfuscation? I know I scramble to understand it. “Financial products”—now there’s a term that would truly turn Orwell in his grave. Indeed, we have moved from being a producer of things to a network of transactions, increasingly legalized scams, but to then call these transactions “products” marks a mystification in the language that makes it quite difficult for the great majority of people to figure out any of the financial news, even if they truly attempt to comprehend. If the financial sector is producing products, that must be a good thing, right?, because we need to be productive. It’s word magic.
The financial news gives us little pieces of the puzzle, but putting the pieces together is like doing a jig-saw puzzle without having a picture of the finished product to work from (a metaphor I’m borrowing from Mariale M. Hardiman’s work on “Brain-Targeted Teaching” http://www.braintargetedteaching.org/index.cfm). Very few have a concept of the overall scheme, and believe it to be far over their heads—to be left to the specialists, of course—and as far as schools go in terms of educating people on that overall scheme, forget it. Our educational system is designed to teach small portions of a situation—that is, the human and larger life situation—as disparate courses of study, to disperse facts with no grounding on how they interlink. The workings of the financial system, or its effects on the larger economy or indeed our total world, are certainly never explained to our children in high school, and as far as colleges go, they concentrate on making the details as mathematically complex, bit by bit, so the students rarely get to see how those details interact with the whole. Besides, unless students decide to major in finance (which virtually guarantees that all they want to do with their lives is make a lot of money), few students take courses in finance. Courses in economics and finance should be required—but alas, if they were, they’d likely be mostly propaganda.
It’s brain damage through education—the educational system pushed by the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Carnegies, the Fords, the Morgans, et al., specifically to make obedient, dumbed-down consumers. It worked for a while. We in the US were so proud of our material plenty, the opportunities afforded us by the beneficent corporations. Never mind that we’ve been being screwed, slowly, for 30-some years, and now the screw is pumping furiously and savagely. The MSM drones out its petty scandals, and life goes on in a dreamlike state of disconnect.
Great comment, Elizabeth. You describe exactly what a deliberately confusing labyrinth of financial gobbledegook these self-appointed Masters of the Universe have contrived, just so anyone trying to crack their manipulative codes will run into one snag after another and finally give up. Even hedge fund wizards probably only understand parts of how the financial system really works, the parts that make them rich in 10 minutes, and scarcely anyone in our hollowed out educational system gets it, so who could teach any of this stuff? The only students who get any real instruction in it are those who are already committed to working within the system of finance, the ones who will get rich manipulating money, or the symbols of wealth.
This is the biggest racket ever devised. If those courses in economics and finance you suggest should be required ever were required, they'd have to be nothing but propaganda and brainwashing (as most economics courses already are), or they would enlighten too many people as to exactly how the financial sector systematically and with impunity rips off the public every day, and is later rewarded for it. The kleptocracy would be exposed and perhaps the jailing of these crooks would commence. We might even return to some semblance of transparency and fairness, and that can't be allowed to ever happen.
Excellent comment. A Chinese financial firm concluded that if one removed those financial transactions that in fact represent NOTHING other then moving money from one pocket to another and back again the true size of the US economy would be 1/4 of what it is claimed to be.
It is all smoke and mirrors.
Another apt image is the famous one from the Charlie Chaplin film, "Monsieur Verdoux," where his protagonist bitterly spits out 'Numbers justify.' The implicit message, small crooks get prosecuted while the big crooks on Wall Street get rich, still applies today.
The 2005 book 'Conspiracy of Fools' by Kurt Eichenwald details the collapse of ENRON. In it, he details how the early versions of credit default swaps, securitization and other obviously criminal accounting tricks worked, and how the the SEC DELIBERATELY scuttled investigations that would have revealed what was happening.
ENRON was an acid test to see if the Banks could pull these kinds of criminal operations off, and make a profit from it while doing so.
The answer appears to be 'Yes'. Especially when you have the Government and the regulators helping you commit these crimes.
GALEN: I made this exact point in threads on CD before. I also added what came down with the S & L scam, as there were important illegal precedents there, too, that became part of the legally accepted weave, or established framework, when a variety of deregulatory reforms were pushed through under Reagan, Clinton and Bush. And don't forget to also include the creative accounting devices deployed by the Arthur Anderson Accounting Firm.
Enron, Arthur Anderson AND the S & L scam together formed blueprints that opened the way for the alchemy that Wall Street's hustlers have trafficked in. Not only have their purposefully misleading deeds & deals led to several million foreclosures here within the Homeland Security State, the impacts are currently rebounding all through Europe. Ironic that having crashed economies overseas, the U.S. dollar will be so far protected from the Hit it so richly deserves due to the corrupt practices of its elites.
Elizabeth H & Nate: Excellent posts
The purpose of modern banking is to hatch debt, get it rated AAA by wholely owned credit rating agencies, and dupe pensions into giving up real money for it. And when everyone figures it out, their owned Congress sides with the banks!
Its just a con, writ large.
You really should add the qualifier "large corporate" to "banking." Many smaller community banks are not at all like this.
UBREW: You and Ray Del Camino know how to nail economic chicanery in very concise, easy to understand terms. Thank you. Your short post is spot on!
Ray, excellent analysis, I was unaware of these engineered collapses. Thank you
Gotta love Capitalism.
>>Why are so many us banking on a financial recovery
>>to bring back jobs and a modicum of justice
>>created by the very people and institutions
>>responsible for the crisis?
Let's ask Ben "He can spell 'Keynes'" Stein.
Watched a little of it, but lost interest. Since none of them went to jail, they couldn't single out any one that should have.
Sorry Danny, but the jails are all full to over flowing. However, if they could manage to catch them with a couple of splivs, then we could probably get them a nice room with a view in Danbury.
The California Supreme Court ordered 40,000 prisoners released because the jails and prisons in that state are simply too crowded.
I wonder if Charlie Manson will be one of those freed?