EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Right-Wing Political Violence: More Terror, Less Coverage
On the morning of January 17 in Spokane, Washington, city workers found a backpack with a bomb that was set to go off along the route of the Martin Luther King Jr. Day parade. An FBI official (Spokane Spokesman Review, 1/19/11) called the bomb “a viable device that was very lethal and had the potential to inflict multiple casualties.” Another official told the Associated Press (1/19/11), “They haven’t seen anything like this in this country.… This was the worst device, and most intentional device, I’ve ever seen.”
On March 9, Kevin Harpham, a white supremacist with past links to the neo-Nazi National Alliance, was arrested and charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and possessing an improvised explosive device. The device contained shrapnel dipped in rat poison, which can enhance bleeding (Hate Watch blog, 3/10/11), and was set on a park bench where its impact would be directed toward marchers.
The Spokane bomb plot received sparse coverage compared to that lavished on a far less dangerous plot attempted in Manhattan’s Times Square just a few months earlier. On May 1, 2010, a poorly made bomb incorporating Fourth of July firecrackers and nonexplosive fertilizer (Washington Post, 5/4/10) was allegedly set by Muslim-American Faisal Shahzad, who was reportedly outraged by civilian deaths from U.S. airstrikes (New York Times, 6/23/10). The device smoked, drawing the attention of a man who alerted police, but failed to go off.
However, network news shows considered the Times Square dud 14 times more newsworthy than the far more sophisticated Spokane bomb. According to the Nexis news media database, in the 10 weeks following the respective acts of terrorism, the Times Square story received 49 mentions on network evening news programs to the Spokane story’s three. (ABC World News didn’t mention the Spokane bomb a single time.)
Likewise, as Salon blogger Justin Elliott pointed out (2/19/11), the very real Spokane bomb plot received one-third the coverage given a November 2010 FBI sting operation in Portland, Oregon, that used a fake bomb, provided by an undercover agent, to ensnare a Somali-born Muslim teenager. On the scant coverage of the Spokane story, Elliot concluded, “The incident does not fit into the reigning narrative of Muslim terrorism.”
That narrative is fundamental to understanding the skewed coverage of domestic terrorism. For instance, on the eve of congressional hearings on domestic Muslim extremism, chaired by Rep. Peter King (R.-N.Y.), a Wall Street Journal editorial (3/11/11) attempted to justify the bigoted proceedings by misrepresenting a RAND Corporation study as finding that Muslims are responsible for virtually all U.S. domestic terrorism. What the 2010 RAND study actually found (FAIR Blog, 3/16/11) was that the vast majority of “homegrown” terrorist attackers—those of all ideologies who successfully carry out an attack—were not Muslims: Of the “83 terrorist attacks in the United States between 9/11 and the end of 2009, only three…were clearly connected with the jihadist cause.”
Running his own interference for King’s hearings, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly (O’Reilly Factor, 3/8/11) responded to domestic terrorism expert Mark Potok’s statement that “our biggest domestic terror threat…pretty clearly comes from the radical right in this country,” by exclaiming: “Are you kidding me? The radical right? The last terror act assigned to them was the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995.”
To make his claim, O’Reilly had to overlook many right-wing domestic terrorist attacks that have happened since Oklahoma City, including two that appear to have been partly inspired by his Fox News colleague Glenn Beck, and one in which O’Reilly himself has been accused of whipping up hatred. (See sidebar.)
In reality, there have been dozens of violent domestic attacks perpetrated by right-wing extremists in the U.S. in recent years. On the Crooks and Liars blog (1/21/11), right-watcher David Neiwert keeps a running list of domestic terror attacks by rightist and anti-government extremists. Since August 2008 alone, Niewert’s list includes two dozen such attacks.
The post-9/11 demonization of Muslims recalls an earlier political era: The post-war Red Scare period of U.S. politics, which featured countless charges of Communist subversion. Some were even true. But during the same period, extremist groups on the right, many of whom embraced racist and fascist violence, received little scrutiny by elites intent on keeping U.S. eyes focused on the Cold War.
Scrutiny of right-wing extremists would have been self-defeating, as red-hunters were often in bed with the far right. From its founding in 1938, the House Un-American Activities Committee was shot through with racist, anti-Semitic and fascist-sympathizing members. Its first chair, Rep. Martin Dies (D.-Texas), hobnobbed with avowed fascists and Nazis like German American Bund chief Fritz Kuhn (Frank Donner, The Un-Americans), while leading member Rep. John Rankin (D.-Miss.) explained HUAC’s refusal to investigate the Ku Klux Klan: “After all, the KKK is an old American institution” (Michael Newton, The Ku Klux Klan in Mississippi).
The links between today’s anti-Muslim witchhunters and the violent far right are more ideological than personal. But the pundits and politicians currently hyping a domestic “Muslim Scare” narrative and ignoring right-wing violence are, like their red-baiting predecessors, maligning and jeopardizing the lives of millions of people, and leaving the public misinformed about the real dangers they face.
SIDEBAR:
FOX & Domestic Terrorists:
Singing the Same Tune
In July 2010, Byron Williams opened fire on two California Highway Patrol officers when they stopped him, as he later told police, while he was on his way to kill people at the Oakland offices of the progressive Tides Foundation and the ACLU. Byron cited as an inspiration Glenn Beck, whom journalist John Hamilton (Media Matters, 10/11/10) pointed out had aired anti-Tides commentaries on 29 separate episodes of his Fox News show.
The Anti-Defamation League reported that Pittsburgh’s Richard Poplawski—who was arrested after a shootout with police that left three officers dead—was so inspired by Beck’s anti-government conspiracy theories he posted to a neo-Nazi website a recording of Beck suggesting the government was building concentration camps for dissidents (FAIR Blog, 11/10/10).
Prior to anti-abortion activist Scott Roeder’s May 2009 murder of women’s health provider Dr. George Tiller, Fox’s Bill O’Reilly and his guests had demonized Tiller in 28 separate episodes of his show, dubbing Tiller a “killer” and accusing him of “Nazi stuff” (Salon.com, 5/31/09).
Jim Adkisson, who shot and killed two people and wounded seven others at a progressive Tennessee church in 2008, wrote a “manifesto” (FAIR Blog, 3/11/10) explaining that he “wanted to kill…every Democrat in the Senate & House, the 100 people in Bernard Goldberg’s book [100 People Who Are Screwing Up America]”. These days, Goldberg is best known for his regular appearances on the O’Reilly Factor.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


13 Comments so far
Show AllWell, that's a rather pathetic attempt at a troll. 2/10 I'd give it, if only because you saw the name of O'Reilly while you scrolled down to hit the comments...
If you haven't figured by now, likeitornot does not actually read the articles that he posts comments to, beyond capturing some vague sense that the article is "un American". He never rebuts the points in the article, and apears to completely miss the point of the article.
What a tool.
WTF are you on about?
No one is being unfairly demonized here.
Your comment is gibberish, and your tossoff about the 60's is stupid and stereotyped.
I know this is not going to be a very popular solution with some, but I'm going to say it anyway. Arm yourselves. Pacifism and passive aggressive whimsy disguised as activism has had absolutely no effect on the crazed authhoritaian fantasies of the teabagging right. Its unfortunate, but the extremists on the right have proven in the last 30 years that they will not be swayed by reason, communication, satire or voting them out of office. Our continuing passivity and need to find "common ground" with those who will not be reasoned with has simply emboldened the right to demand more and more and more. We need to stand up and say we are sick of this and get ready to beat these assholes down in a way they haven't been beaten down before. We need to stop apologizing for making a stand ourselves. Until we do, they will never, ever by satisfied with what they have
This topic of terrorism and double standards for the right is just what it should be and as expected coming from FAIR. Keep up the good work!
Right. We arm ourselves with hand guns and rifles against...what? THE ARMY???? You think our military will join us, the way those of Northern Africa joined the people? Pardon me while I laugh my ass off.
You're a troll, right? Trying to get us scanned as a violent resistance. Back in the 60s there used to be guys like you come to Peace meetings. Easy to spot.
Oh, come on now. We all know that the handguns and rifles that are protected by the second amendment are there to secure your liberties. Liberties like the right to a fair trial, and to not be searched unreasonably. not to mention speaking out about whatever you want. That second amendment has worked very well for everyone in the States over the last two centuries, and especially in the last decade.
Given the record of the US Army in the last few wars, I'd have to say you'd have a great chance... really... honest...
Bhwa ha ha hah a
The fact that right-wing political violence gets less play in the corporate media (especially in Rupert Murdoch's 'news' organs) is not surprising in the least. Often times, the perpetrators of right-wing violence are deluded, barely sane (if that) dupes who actually believe the tripe emanating from the likes of Fox Noise Channel. Thus it is quite natural said corporate 'news' operations have no desire to air the misbegotten results of their propaganda. It deviates from the company line.
As always, it's not terrorism if 'we' do it...
When is FAIR going to stop simply giving us one more example of the corporate media's dominant narrative/propaganda model? I read all the examples I need years ago in Chomsky and Herman's "Manufacturing Consent". Sure, FAIR calls for us to write polite requests for the media to correct their stories. But we have been this doing enough to know that it does not work.
We are long overdue for direct action against the commercial corporate media - in their offices and presses and at their transmitters.