EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Popular content
Today's Top News
Power Concedes Nothing Without a Demand
The liberal class is discovering what happens when you tolerate the intolerant. Let hate speech pollute the airways. Let corporations buy up your courts and state and federal legislative bodies. Let the Christian religion be manipulated by charlatans to demonize Muslims, gays and intellectuals, discredit science and become a source of personal enrichment. Let unions wither under corporate assault. Let social services and public education be stripped of funding. Let Wall Street loot the national treasury with impunity. Let sleazy con artists use lies and deception to carry out unethical sting operations on tottering liberal institutions, and you roll out the welcome mat for fascism.
Damon Terrell speaks to demonstrators at the state Capitol in Madison, Wis., during a series of protests against a then-pending bill to eliminate collective bargaining rights for many state workers. Last Friday Gov. Scott Walker signed the legislation into law. (AP / Andy Manis)
The liberal class has busied itself with the toothless pursuits of inclusiveness, multiculturalism, identity politics and tolerance—a word Martin Luther King never used—and forgotten about justice. It naively sought to placate ideological and corporate forces bent on the destruction of the democratic state. The liberal class, like the misguided democrats in the former Yugoslavia or the hapless aristocrats in the Weimar Republic, invited the wolf into the henhouse. The liberal class forgot that, as Karl Popper wrote in “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” “If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.”
Workers in this country paid for their rights by suffering brutal beatings, mass expulsions from company housing and jobs, crippling strikes, targeted assassinations of union leaders and armed battles with hired gun thugs and state militias. The Rockefellers, the Mellons, the Carnegies and the Morgans—the Koch Brothers Industries, Goldman Sachs and Wal-Mart of their day—never gave a damn about workers. All they cared about was profit. The eight-hour workday, the minimum wage, Social Security, pensions, job safety, paid vacations, retirement benefits and health insurance were achieved because hundreds of thousands of workers physically fought a system of capitalist exploitation. They rallied around radicals such as “Mother” Jones, United Mine Workers’ President John L. Lewis and “Big” Bill Haywood and his Wobblies as well as the socialist presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs.
Lewis said, “I have pleaded your case from the pulpit and from the public platform—not in the quavering tones of a feeble mendicant asking alms, but in the thundering voice of the captain of a mighty host, demanding the rights to which free men are entitled.”
Those who fought to achieve these rights endured tremendous suffering, pain and deprivation. It is they who made possible our middle class and opened up our democracy. The elite hired goons and criminal militias to evict striking miners from company houses, infiltrate fledgling union organizations and murder suspected union leaders and sympathizers. Federal marshals, state militias, sheriff’s deputies and at times Army troops, along with the courts and legislative bodies, were repeatedly used to crush and stymie worker revolts. Striking sugar cane workers were gunned down in Thibodaux, La., in 1887. Steel workers were shot to death in 1892 in Homestead, Pa. Railroad workers in the Pullman strike of 1894 were murdered. Coal miners at Ludlow, Colo., in 1914 and at Matewan, W.Va., in 1920 were massacred. Our freedoms and rights were paid for with their courage and blood.
American democracy arose because those consciously locked out of the system put their bodies on the line and demanded justice. The exclusion of the poor and the working class from the systems of power in this country was deliberate. The Founding Fathers deeply feared popular democracy. They rigged the system to favor the elite from the start, something that has been largely whitewashed in public schools and by a corporate media that has effectively substituted myth for history. Europe’s poor, fleeing to America from squalid slums and workhouses in the 17th and 18th centuries, were viewed by the privileged as commodities to exploit. Slaves, Native Americans, indentured servants, women, and men without property were not represented at the Constitutional Conventions. And American history, as Howard Zinn illustrated in “The People’s History of the United States,” is one long fight by the marginalized and disenfranchised for dignity and freedom. Those who fought understood the innate cruelty of capitalism.
“When you sell your product, you retain your person,” said a tract published in the 1880s during the Lowell, Mass., mill strikes. “But when you sell your labour, you sell yourself, losing the rights of free men and becoming vassals of mammoth establishments of a monied aristocracy that threatens annihilation to anyone who questions their right to enslave and oppress. Those who work in the mills ought to own them, not have the status of machines ruled by private despots who are entrenching monarchic principles on democratic soil as they drive downwards freedom and rights, civilization, health, morals and intellectuality in the new commercial feudalism.”
As Noam Chomsky points out, the sentiment expressed by the Lowell millworkers predated Marxism.
“At one time in the U.S. in the mid-nineteenth century, a hundred and fifty years ago, working for wage labor was considered not very different from chattel slavery,” Chomsky told David Barsamian. “That was not an unusual position. That was the slogan of the Republican Party, the banner under which Northern workers went to fight in the Civil War. We’re against chattel slavery and wage slavery. Free people do not rent themselves to others. Maybe you’re forced to do it temporarily, but that’s only on the way to becoming a free person, a free man, to put it in the rhetoric of the day. You become a free man when you’re not compelled to take orders from others. That’s an Enlightenment ideal. Incidentally, this was not coming from European radicalism. There were workers in Lowell, Mass., a couple of miles from where we are. You could even read editorials in the New York Times saying this around that time. It took a long time to drive into people’s heads the idea that it is legitimate to rent yourself. Now that’s unfortunately pretty much accepted. So that’s internalizing oppression. Anyone who thinks it’s legitimate to be a wage laborer is internalizing oppression in a way which would have seemed intolerable to people in the mills, let’s say, a hundred and fifty years ago. … [I]t’s an [unfortunate] achievement [of indoctrination in our culture].”
Our consumer society and celebrity culture foster a frightening historical amnesia. We chatter mindlessly about something called the “American Dream.” And now that the oligarchic elite have regained control of all levers of power, and that dream is being exposed as a cruel hoax, we are being shoved back into the cage. There will be hell to pay to get back to where we were.
Slick public relations campaigns, the collapse of public education—nearly a third of the country is illiterate or semiliterate—and the rise of amoral politicians such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, who posed as liberals while they sold their souls for corporate money, have left us largely defenseless. The last vestiges of unionized workers in the public sector are reduced to protesting in Wisconsin for collective bargaining—in short, the ability to ask employers for decent working conditions. That shows how far the country has deteriorated. And it looks as though even this basic right to ask, as well as raise money through union dues, has been successfully revoked in Madison. The only hope now is more concerted and militant disruptions of the systems of power.
The public debate, dominated by corporate-controlled systems of information, ignores the steady impoverishment of the working class and absence of legal and regulatory mechanisms to prevent mounting corporate fraud and abuse. The airwaves are saturated with corporate apologists. They ask us why public-sector employees have benefits—sneeringly called “entitlements”—which nonunionized working- and middle-class people are denied. This argument is ingenious. It pits worker against worker in a mad scramble for scraps. And until we again speak in the language of open class warfare, grasping, as those who went before us did, that the rich will always protect themselves at our expense, we are doomed to a 21st century serfdom.
The pillars of the liberal establishment, which once made incremental and piecemeal reform possible, have collapsed. The liberal church forgot that heretics exist. It forgot that the scum of society—look at the new Newt Gingrich—always wrap themselves in the flag and clutch the Christian cross to promote programs that mock the core teachings of Jesus Christ. And, for all their years of seminary training and Bible study, these liberal clergy have stood by mutely as televangelists betrayed and exploited the Gospel to promote bigotry, hatred and greed. What was the point, I wonder, of ordination? Did they think the radical message of the Gospel was something they would never have to fight for? Schools and universities, on their knees for corporate dollars and their boards dominated by hedge fund and investment managers, have deformed education into the acquisition of narrow vocational skills that serve specialized corporate interests and create classes of drone-like systems managers. They make little attempt to equip students to make moral choices, stand up for civic virtues and seek a life of meaning. These moral and ethical questions are never even asked. Humanities departments are vanishing as swiftly as the ocean’s fish stocks.
The electronic and much of the print press has become a shameless mouthpiece for the powerful and a magnet for corporate advertising. It makes little effort to give a platform to those who without them cannot be heard, instead diverting us with celebrity meltdowns, lavish lifestyle reports and gossip. Legitimate news organizations, such as NPR and The New York Times, are left cringing and apologizing before the beast—right-wing groups that hate “liberal” news organizations not because of any bias, but because they center public discussion on verifiable fact. And verifiable fact is not convenient to ideologues whose goal is the harnessing of inchoate rage and hatred.
Artists, who once had something to say, have retreated into elite enclaves, preoccupied themselves with abstract, self-referential garbage, frivolous entertainment and spectacle. Celebrities, working for advertising agencies and publicists, provide our daily mini-dramas and flood the airwaves with lies on behalf of corporate sponsors. The Democratic Party has sold out working men and women for corporate money. It has permitted the state apparatus to be turned over to corporate interests. There is no liberal institution left—the press, labor, culture, public education, the church or the Democratic Party—that makes any effort to hold back the corporate juggernaut. It is up to us.
We have tolerated the intolerant—from propaganda outlets such as Fox News to Christian fascists to lunatics in the Republican Party to Wall Street and corporations—and we are paying the price. The only place left for us is on the street. We must occupy state and federal offices. We must foment general strikes. The powerful, with no check left on their greed and criminality, are gorging on money while they busily foreclose our homes, bust the last of our unions, drive up our health care costs and cement into place a permanent underclass of the broken and the poor. They are slashing our most essential and basic services—including budgets for schools, firefighters and assistance programs for children and the elderly—so we can pay for the fraud they committed when they wiped out $14 trillion of housing wealth, wages and retirement savings. All we have left is the capacity to say “no.” And if enough of us say “no,” if enough of us refuse to cooperate, the despots are in trouble.
“Let me give you a word of the philosophy of reforms,” Frederick Douglass said in 1857. “The whole history of the progress of human history shows that all concessions yet made to her august claims have been born of struggle. ... If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. The struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will...”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


241 Comments so far
Show AllThe liberal "class"? What the hell is that? Socioeconomic class--that I understand. But I do not know what the "liberal class" refers to. Does he mean all the people that subscribe to vaguely left points of view--capitalism with bounce for the poor and the workers? Would a black guy who picks up trash and votes for Obama be "liberal"? An retiree from teaching who believes McCain would have been a mistake far worse than Obama? George Soros?
Upon thinking about it, I know what the "liberal class" is: It is everyone in this country (besides Republicans) who Hedges doesn't like. Apparently, such people do not do enough to fight the engulfing tide of evangelicalism, free marketeers, small government activists, climate change deniers, and big monied interests that whine about the demands placed upon them. Can't say as I am impressed with his analysis: People are people--they try to feed their families, educate them, and grasp for a few straws of happiness in life. They don't deserve the opprobrium Hedges has for them. In particular, he seems isolated from the currents of life ordinary people experience: the getting ready for work, the card games at the Senior Center, the church socials, the visits to the library, watching a school basketball game, the time fishing on a lake somewhere. Yeah, we should not tolerate the forces that would overturn our world, but neither should we scream ourselves hoarse at the torpor of ordinary people just trying to get by. Hedges has time, money, and the will to confront Evil but not everybody does.
You should be thanking him for trying to help you feed your family, educate the masses, and bring happiness into your and your children's lives.
He spends his time and money fighting for you.
You throw darts at him and then go fishing.
I'm not sure his articles, full of rage, do anything to make the world a better place to live in.
And what exactly are you doing about the right wing Obama Admin. hero besides its chief apologist?
Who's an apologist for Obama? Just because I think Hedges is unhinged at times doesn't mean I support the president.
So what pray tell are you doing about it? Every time Hedges posts a piece you mimick the same obnoxious refrain about Hedges "rage." Conversely, one might conclude that you are under no such emotional trigger about the rightward drift into neo conservative values, along with Obama's assault on the disenfranchised. On the one hand, you claim to be against Obama, then attack Hedges who accurately critiques the impotent liberal movement which is more conerned with keeping their corproate jobs, driving their gas guzzlers, getting their little darling into Harvard, and the upkeep on their pretty little house on Sunny Side Street in the burbs. Hedges has advocated for grass roots activism, building Third Parties, he has participated and been arrested for protesting the war in Afghansitan within the last six months. I was in Washington with him on one of those events with other vets. Where were you, hero, besides posting on CD?
Hedges has been on the front lines his entire life, so save us the self-righteous indignation.
He's a rabble-rouser. We're the rabble. And the alternative to becoming roused is to lie down and let the steamroller of unfettered capital do its thing. So, yes, a world where people are enraged at injustice is a better place to live than one where we arll go fishing and wait for the steamroller.
Methinks you should reread this article, and some of his others.
What have you done recently to make the world a 'better' place? Gone fishing??
Don't forget the card game at the Church . . .
Hedges' writing gets better with every posting. drosera, with all due respect, I think you are very mistaken.
"Words. The real heroes are ideas, but these have no life without words. We don’t think in one grand idea. Maharishis and gurus have been trying to do that for centuries and if we were conscious like that we’d be god. So it is that words get all the praise and adulation, and why not: the messenger is the message.
The periods of the Revolution and the Civil War recorded so much oratory and written argument that is unparalleled in the utterances of ordinary times, that it is easily believed that here were human beings superior to ourselves. Words, carefully crafted and stripped of unnecessary distractions, exposed the core issues and urged the audience to action. “…the world will little remember nor long note what is said here today, but we should never forget what has been done here…” Sorry Abraham, you were wrong; your words likely will always define the truth of such a devastating struggle as Gettysburg.
Before television, before radio, before newspapers and magazines, people talked. Words were in much greater demand and more highly regarded than they are today. But, just as ideas are the actual heroes, they are also the root cause in the shortage of good words today. Good words are just the fruit of good ideas growing strongly and naturally from healthy reasoning." Justaman - 6/15/05
"Hedges' writing gets better with every posting" - absolutely!
Oh well - I have also seen Chris Hedges on demonstrations and vigils. But I do not know if that does anything to make the world a better place either. Point is, he is trying his best and that is all any one of us can do. But we have to keep thinking critically about how to improve what we do, and most importantly, how to get more people to understand and to act.
I respect seekers. I think he is a seeker like Malcolm X, and may have to go through many revisions of his thought and action, as we all must.
drosera,
The only rational response to a tsunami of outrages perpetrated on the average person over the last 30 years (at least) is RAGE.
I think you are in denial about our plight. We are at the beach watching that huge wave on the horizon coming this way. Chris is yelling and screaming to everyone to DO SOMETHING and you are telling everyone to calm down and be rational...
I am a pacifist. However, I believe in using lethal force to defend myself. I will not go quietly.
If you want to go quietly, you certainly have that right. I hope your family and descendents forgive you.
Someone below wrote "no disrespect intended". Screw drosera and his bile and bellyaching. He should get off his fat ass, go out and commit some remarkable act of defiance against the oligarchs, and then come back and write about, instead of whining about how much Hedges earns.
Line of the Day: "You throw darts at him and then go fishing."
This was so often my experience in activism - people who should be chomping at the bit to get involved behave like petty millionaires. Chris Hedges is the thunderous moral voice we need, and something else is true: there will either be a battle or there will be a surrender. The rich and corporations have left no other choice.
"Chris Hedges is the thunderous moral voice we need" - I wholeheartedly agree!
Drosera:
"The liberal "class"? What the hell is that? .... Upon thinking about it, I know what the "liberal class" is: It is everyone in this country (besides Republicans) who Hedges doesn't like."
*******
No disrespect intended, Drosera, but I think you're misinterpreting this article and Hedges's use of the term "liberal class" entirely.
Hedges is not demonizing ordinary people on the liberal "left".
By "liberal class" Hedges is referring to powerful INSTITUTIONS-- "the press, labor [unions], culture, public education [universities], the church or the Democratic Party"--that traditionally could be counted on to offer some sort of resistance to the now all-consuming power structure of the state capitalist-oligarchy TO AGITATE ON BEHALF OF ORDINARY PEOPLE.
Hedges argues that these traditional "liberal" institutions have been co-opted by the "corporate juggernaut" and are now subservient to the capitalist power structure and, though they often hide behind the veneer of Enlightenment principles, no longer agitate on behalf of ordinary people or the vulnerable and downtrodden, but have instead become antagonistic to traditional liberalism in pursuit of power and profit.
Anyone who critically analyzes the role these "liberal" institutions now play in our society could not disagree with Hedges's conclusion. For a more indepth analysis of his argument, I highly recommend his most recent book, Death of the Liberal Class.
Drosera,
If you don't know what the liberal class is, then you must be living in a remote cabin in the woods somehere. You certainly have never been in any of the many "fashionable" high-rent gentrified urban neighborhoods - and the "Prius with a Obama-sticker" suburbs, where they can be viewed in their native habitat.
Hint: If you cant get to these places, simply tune in an NPR's "Morning Edition" or "All Things Considered"; that is your liberal class...
For a deeper understanding you need a dose of George Carlin:
http://ampedstatus.org/network/members/johnny/activity/11489/
Or just look up Phil Ochs famous song "Love Me I'm a Liberal". Then again, can we even assume that everyone here knows who Phil Och's was?
Well, for me "liberal" first means a lifestyle. Fashion. Materialism. Money. Anything "me" first. Liberalism has many things in common with conservatives--but mainly domination, empire/capitalism and war. No matter how much liberals argue the point, liberals are just as cold bloodied. Both political parties justify killing others. One in the name of 'defense', the other in the name of 'humanity'. Both feed the empire. My own basic line is this: If you support the killing of others and acquisition of their resources to expand the Empire's dominance, then you are a liberal. Life itself for me is the dividing line--whether its killing humans or the exploitation of all creatures. If you don't revere all that lives within the planet, that nature had produced, then you are a liberal.
What differentiates liberals from conservatives though is its chilling tendency to use lethal force against its own citizens at home, e.g. Waco and Ruby Ridge. These types of incidents always occur under democratic/liberal administrations. They are then ignored by the liberals. They are always pro-state.
On another note, I still remain rather perplexed at the notion of calling out FOX News but letting the likes of NBC, CBS and ABC slide. They are all guilty of being parties to empire. It couldn't have happened without them. Fox simply cornered a market of conservatives which took money out of liberal pockets. The meat at the end of the day though is the same. Empire by violence: abroad or at home.
Of the two parties, Democrats/Liberals scare me the most. I think of them as human chameleons.
Ruby Ridge was 1992, Bush Sr.
moonpie, I applaud your focus on the centrality of Empire --- and with the fact that both political parties justify killing others, and that both the facade of "liberalism" and "conservativism" enable and disguise Empire's focus on domination, empire/capitalism and war. [I would only add, both abroad and at home]
Hedges, early on, accurately states, "The liberal class has busied itself with the toothless pursuits of inclusiveness, multiculturalism, identity politics and tolerance" ---- including the tolerance of this hidden Empire.
Hedges is exactly right that a supposed 'liberal class', which should focus on the single, signal, and seminal cancer of Empire, has been diverted by a multiplicity of toothless, varied, divided, identity and 'issue' politics --- which only furthers the hiding the seminal and CAUSAL Empire.
Yes, Chris, it is false tolerance to allow the global ruling-elite's capitalist corporate/financial/militarist EMPIRE, which hides behind the facade of its bought and owned TWO-Party "Vichy" sham of faux-democracy, to perpetrate all crimes foreign and domestic, and yet to stay covered and hidden by a tolerance which does not shout out, "It's the EMPIRE that is doing this".
We can not be so tolerant as to allow Empire to not be publicly and clearly identified, targeted, attacked, and excised --- like the cancer that it is.
I strongly believe in what Hedges' says here, but even more strongly believe that the 'silence' of hidden "EMPIRE" must not be tolerated any more.
There needs to be a clear and easily understood singularity to the very name of what can't be tolerated --- and that name, which engenders detestable intolerance to all 'democracy-thinking' people is Empire.
We, as the "Multitude" committed to revolt "Against Empire" and overturn this sneaky "Inverted Totalitarianism" and "Empire of Illusion" can not arise in solidarity for that battle if there is not a name of what it is that we are confronting, combating, and excising from our lives --- both here in the US and throughout the world that is ready for revolt --- and that name is Empire.
All working-class and democracy-thinking people here and abroad innately hate Empire --- those abroad because it is the lance of imperialism in their faces even now, and those here because, as Americans, we still harbor an American colonial memory of hatred of Empire.
Both "The Coming Insurrection" and Wikileak's target of exposure and confrontation is with none less than --- global Empire.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Liberty over violent empire -- People's Party
we got a shill here folks - ignore him, he'll head back to fox news directly i suppose
Drosera is a long-time poster here. You have to understand that a person who has not been involved in antiwar and social justice activism - i.e.at least personally knows some organizers and attends rallys and demonstrations, is understandably confused as to what Chris Hedges is talking about, but if you are involved in activism, you know exactly what he is talking about.
Drosera, your words are the words of a coward. Rationalized fear keeps people from taking action. If you cannot fight then at least stop criticizing those who can, it's pathetic.
Drosera - you are right about one thing - Hedges should define his terms. Having read a lot of Hedges, I'd say he means the elite Liberal class: wealthy, powerful, involved in arts, media, finance, writers, TV liberals, columnists and mainly, the political apparatus of the Democratic party. This is the small army of operatives, errand boys and mouthpieces and their focal point - the elected officials who profess the modern version of the Liberal political philosophy "Work hard and play by the rules and you will succeed". A cowardly slogan but about all that mainstream Liberals seem willing to voice anymore.
I don't think Hedges is talking about everyday folks who happen to vote for liberal politicians, although sadly enough, they share a significant portion of the responsibility. I too am busy with life and family but I have never surrendered, boiled down or pissed away my underlying worldview to the point where I would call Barack Obama or John Kerry "progressives". I know formerly perfectly sensible liberals, however, who adhere rigidly to these unfounded characterizations. And they do share some of the blame.
Let's face it, by distraction, apathy, confusion and "tolerance", we have surrendered almost all of the available political terrain to people who want nothing but to exploit us and our world. "Hope" itself has become a brand, not a virtue. And now they are coming for the tiny fraction that they do not already control. That's what Hedges is talking about.
So, drosera, how much were you paid for this?
let there be "days of rage" against corporate dictatorship!
Well, this is my first time reading an article by this guy, but ... I would definitely have to agree with your assessment of this, drosera. It was a good article until he had to go bashing people by name, showing much more "tolerance" for those on the Republican side than those of Democrats or "Liberals" ... whatever that's supposed to mean these days.
I would have loved to have passed this story around to others ... but, Mr. Hedges sounds like he has a major chip on his shoulder ... bitter, angry and like a partisan trying to sound bipartisan ... and failing miserably, kinda like CNN does with their facade of "fair and balanced" news reporting.
Hopefully he will learn to tone it down a notch, 'cause while I like the general gist of his message, unfortunately, the delivery of it leaves a lot to be desired.
The corporate plutocrats were more than passive bystanders as the left intoxicated itself with delusions regarding the magical properties of tolerance. The plutocrats controlling the media set up levees to direct the flow of ideas, blocking the flow that would support tolerance of socialistic or communistic ideas, while allowing the flow that supported tolerance of other ideas. Often the plutocrats would even encourage the flow of ideas of tolerance to help create a divergence in values, making it ever more difficult for the little people to find common ground to defend and organize around, making solidarity elusive and making the formation of an effective resistance to the plunder of the plutocrats unlikely.
Starting Monday morning with Hedges is a powerful challenge. His truth and concise analysis is a dope-slap to all of us as we move through our habituated lives, in varied levels of comfort and struggle which for most of us have way too much of the former and do way too little of the latter. Our toys and distractions are siren songs, soma to our as yet undeveloped outrage against the undeniable trends our decadent society exhibit. We have so many tools available to us, what we don't have is the backbone, commitment and ethic of shared struggle our former generations had. It is completely understandable why the powerful want to separate us from our history.
Yes, and besides all of the toys and distractions we have become so self-involved and selfish. I mentioned on a post yesterday that people are now protesting heavily because the shit is finally hitting THEIR solid, middleclass lives. It seems to take too much self-interest to get motivation.
Well said Joe. Check out the video, Kucinich in Wisconsin....another voice who is a "rabble rouser" for the People! Chris Hedges has been becoming more and more enraged. I saw him as a pacifist a few years ago....effective but without any clear ideas about how to change things. Now, he is advocating "militant civil disobedience!" This is a huge change from his original stance of quiet, peaceful civil disobedience. Why? Because quiet, peaceful civil disobedience was patently ignored by the oligarchy! They just discounted us as trivial annoyances. It's time to ramp up the decibel level a bit.
I do believe in a tipping point in which humanity may transcend our present downward spiral and self destructive tendencies....but in order to have time to get there, we will need to make some noise globally, to let the Corporate Capitalists know we are NOT on their side one single bit and will fight them for our lives. We can change the world or not. The choice is ours. We must start somewhere and we need to replace the poisonous propaganda fed into our brains with living, nourishing food....and that food is NEW words, new ideas that are spread like refreshing rain on a soil grown dry and cracked and infertile. Don't kill our visionaries and seed planters! Don't stifle the messages that will reform our brains circuits!
Thank you Mr. Hedges for your essay. I, too, have a problem with the term liberal class. Was it Chomsky who said that the term liberal means anything we want it to and therefore, nothing.
What we really need is more of the language that you use to blast the "scum of society," as you wrote. We need to shout the words class warfare in the faces of the oligarchs and their sycophantic whore politicians who have sold out their fellow citizens. This war started at least 30 years ago and at least some finally are calling it what it is.
If you read the article again, Hedges says it started about 150 years ago, when workers became wage slaves. The transition from skilled workers to factory workers, in environments described by Dickens, was the start.
We on the left are voiceless, lack organization and the ability to mobilize. Hedges is correct. AmeriKKKans have hardly any knowledge of history, and the pablum that is served up in the public schools is a history re-written to reinforce the ruling elites' lies and propaganda.
The other day someone on commondreams suggested that we set a date for a general strike; yet hardly anybody even responded to the comment. Unless and until we demand a living wage, good health care, fair-trade policies, good public schools, etc. and back up these demands with general strikes, boycotts and non-violent direct action, things will get worse.
On May 1, don't go to work (call in sick), don't buy anything, don't drive anywhere--continue these actions for as long as you can or until the ruling elite give back to us what is already ours. How about it?
Let's start putting ideas into actions. NOW!
"When the working class unites, there will be a lot of jobless labor leaders".-Eugene V. Debs
"I am not a number. I am a free man!"-spoken by #6 from the 1960s cult classic television program The Prisoner
These are nice quotes, but it's unclear what your point is.
I thought the point was obvious. When the working class is able to unite and stand firm then they will have no need for anyone to lead them. As to the second quote, I take that to mean that one does not have remain a cipher in today's world which is what the corporations and those in power have in mind for the working person, the individual in this country, as well as the rest of the world. They will not allow themselves to remain subjugated at the hands of the ruling class because as #6 observes, he, and therefore they, are free to make choices which benefit them and not those who rule over them.
"We on the left are voiceless, lack organization and the ability to mobilize."
Bullshyt Tom Joad. You just do not understand the new technology. Centralization is out and Decentralization is in. Each person is now an online participant in policy formation. Ideas are crunched until a vision is formed. Currently that vision is the understanding that dissent must be forceful. Dissent was weak in Wisconsin because it failed to strike, to fight and do the risky dirtywork of Democracy. That is the concept that people are adopting. Wisconsin cowered. Will Ohio cower too or will people get the message?
When does the much-vaunted national STRIKE begin? I'm hearing April Fool's Day. Is everyone mobilized?
At this point there are two differing groups calling for General Strike on Facebook. One on March 30 and the other on March 31. Since FB was a big part of the revolutions in Egypt and other nations, why not organize around one of those dates and actually stop everything. Check it out.
Thanks!!
When does the national STRIKE begin? I'm hearing April Fool's Day. Is everyone mobilized?
I hear you Tom....May 1st sounds good. We have to start somewhere, so I will put this date on my calendar and not buy anything or go anywhere. It's a start and the formation of a new mindset that may, if we give it a chance, turn into "empowerment!"
May 1 is May Day, and groups are organizing for an international day of solidarity and asking everyone to not work, go to school, or shop. It also happens to be a Sunday (when no one's in school and most do not work). Nevertheless, it's a start:
For Immediate Release:
May Day United
Contact: info@maydayunited.org
March 10, 2011
Groups Nationwide Call for A Day Without Workers on May 1st to Combat Growing Attacks on Working Families
We are all Wisconsin, We are all Immigrants, We are all Workers!
New York, NY- May Day United, an emerging network of worker and community-based organizations has called today for a national day of action on May 1, 2011, International Workers' Day, to demand jobs with dignity and equality for every working person. The call for A Day Without Workers comes amid spirited resistance to the relentless attacks taking place against public and private sector union members, immigrants, and all working families across the United States. In the spirit of the historic actions of May Day 2006, large-scale resistance to union-busting in Wisconsin, and mass worker dissent in Egypt, organizers are asking working families to embrace a call of No Work, No School, and No Shopping on May Day 2011.
“The vicious attack on workers, in Wisconsin and statehouses across the country, has generated a strong response from labor to protect the right to bargain for wages, working conditions and benefits. As workers we refuse to be scapegoated for the economic woes of the state." said Carlos Pelayo, of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA) in San Diego. "We ask that all working families on May Day say no to work, school, and shopping and come march in the streets with all workers for dignity and respect."
As tension builds around the country over the attempt to destroy collective bargaining and continued violations of the human rights of immigrants, May Day 2011 could be a pivotal movement for the U.S. working class. May Day United's Facebook event for "A Day Without Workers" (http://on.fb.me/gEQSjG) has quickly gained almost 800 people committing to the call of No Work, No School, and No Shopping on May 1st. With many unionists in Wisconsin and elsewhere seriously discussing a general strike for the first time in recent memory, the potential for a dramatic May Day is high. May 1st falls on a Sunday this year which organizers say will help facilitate participation.
"We marched in 2006 and every year since for immigrant rights and workers' rights," said Cesar Barturen, an immigrant worker from Peru. "We hope to see more people in the streets this year - all workers united as a single force in this country and across the world."
May Day United is an emerging national network of worker and community-based organizations promoting dynamic actions on May 1st, 2011 for jobs with dignity and true equality. The network is online at www.facebook.com/maydayunited.
This is in fact just common sense. It's obvious what has happened, how our culture has regressed, often deliberately. The great sin is that we tolerated it. We've stopped calling BS even when something is obviously BS--or to look at it through the jaundiced, myopic eyes of our so-called media, BS is now considered a valid point of view deserving of equal time with serious scholarly study, for example. People who call themselves Christians but behave as anything but are referred to as Christians with no irony or qualification.
It would not have taken drastic action to squelch this in its infancy, simply a refusal to accept it or anyone who supported it. Now, it will require much greater effort because we must regain what has been lost.
Media is the front line of oppression, the trenches dug straight into people's living rooms. The first action of the counter-offensive is to clear the trenches.
If a politician told a lie in the woods and no one was there .......
clear the media trenches...absolutely...
give yourself a chance to think, uninterrupted...
hard enough ignoring what is being spewed now...even harder to rip out what's already been planted within...
if the politician found the woods empty, he\she would be forced to wander aimlessly until encountering anyone to lie to...
proselytizing...
if Dr. Dolittle sold out, and tried to lie to the animals, would they buy it?
I don't think so...
radioactive explosions and ensuing radiation leaks certainly focus the mind...
what a party!