Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Avatar ,The Prequel: Will 'Earth’s Last Stand' Sweep the 2013 Oscars?
The anticipation may be building, but we'll all have to wait for the 82nd Academy Awards on March 7th to find out just how many Oscars the global box-office smash Avatar will receive. That 3-D sci-fi spectacle, directed by James Cameron, has garnered nine nominations, including ones for Best Picture and Best Director, and it's already overtaken Titanic, another Cameron global blockbuster, as the top money-maker in movie history. But there's an even bigger question absorbing Avatar's millions of fans: What will Cameron, who has already indicated that he's planning to write a novel based on Avatar, do for a screen encore? As it happens, I have a suggestion: skip the sequels on faraway Pandora's sister worlds, and do the prequel.
Admittedly, the movie I have in mind (set in a world that Avatar hints at) would lack the blue-skinned Na'vi people, but it would still feature Jake Scully, this time in his real body, on the most intriguing planet of all: Earth. And given a global audience that can't get enough of Cameron's work, how many wouldn't pay big bucks for a chance to take a Pandora-style, sensory-expanding guided tour of our own planet? It would be part of a harrowing tale of environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and perennial conflict in the twilight years of humanity's decline. Think of it as Avatar: Earth's Last Stand.
Cameron offers many indications in Avatar that this is the logical direction for him to take. At a poignant moment before the climactic battle between the Na'vi and the remorseless humans begins, for instance, Scully, the renegade Marine turned native rebel, pleads for help from Eywa, the goddess who rules over Pandora: "See, the world we come from -- there's no green there -- they killed their Mother." At another point, Colonel Quaritch, the homicidal Marine commander played with gusto by Stephen Lang, refers to Scully's previous service with the First Marine Reconnaissance unit on Earth, highlighting his three combat tours in Venezuela. "That was some mean bush," he says. Then, speaking of his own combat record, Quaritch alludes to fierce fighting in Nigeria. For anyone familiar with the present competition for global energy resources, Venezuela and Nigeria stand out as major oil producers with a history of civil strife.
2144 in 3-D
Imagine them, then, on a future, energy-starved planet. In fact, I can easily picture such a future, so let me take one more step and offer myself to Cameron as a technical consultant on his prequel. Admittedly, I wouldn't be the person to write the film's plot or script -- I know my limits -- but when it comes to charting future resource wars, I think I could be useful. Drawing on Cameron's clues in Avatar and my own books, including Resource Wars, Blood and Oil, and Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet, let me just sketch out the prequel scenario I envision:
It's the torrid summer of 2144, just a decade before Avatar begins. (That movie takes place in summer 2154, after a flight from Earth that, we're told, involves six continuous years of sleep, which helps us backdate Jake Scully's Venezuelan combat tours.) As it has been for decades, the world is at war, with competing power blocs fighting bitterly over a diminishing pool of vital resources.
Three great power centers dominate the global resource struggle, all located in the northern latitudes where the climate still remains tolerable and the land still receives sufficient rainfall to support agriculture. The first of these, in whose legions both Scully and Quaritch fight, is the North American Federation, founded after the United States, facing desertification in its southern half, invaded and absorbed Canada. The second, Greater China, incorporating northern China, the Korean peninsula, and eastern Siberia (seized from Russia in a series of wars), dominates what's left of Asia; the third, the North European Alliance, encompassing Germany, Russia (west of the Urals), and Scandinavia, relies heavily on Arctic resources. As in the world portrayed by George Orwell in 1984, these powers continually jockey for dominance in shifting alliances, while their armies face one another in the torrid, still relatively resource-rich parts of the planet. In this neo-Orwellian world, warfare and the constant pressure of resource competition are the only constants.
Thanks to global warming, the planet's tropical and subtropical regions, including large parts of Africa, the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, and South and Southeast Asia, as well as Mexico and the American Southwest, have become virtually uninhabitable. Many island nations and coastal areas, including much of Florida, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and the Philippines, lie under water. Critical raw materials like oil, coal, natural gas, uranium, copper, and cobalt are perennially scarce. Starvation is a constant fear for those not affluent enough to pay for increasingly expensive genetically-modified crops and meat produced on corporate farms with multiple chemical inputs.
Large-scale industrial civilization still persists, but many once-industrialized areas have been abandoned, and what factories and transport systems remain are constantly constrained by limited energy supplies and the lack of steady flows of vital resources. Oil is particularly hard to come by, and so, in all three power blocs, its use is largely restricted to the military, security forces, emergency services, the largest of corporations, and the very rich. (If you want to get a sense of such a world, imagine Mel Gibson's 1979 movie Road Warrior on steroids.) Other sources of energy, including natural gas and uranium, are also in increasingly scant supply. Renewable sources, including wind and solar power, help to make up some, but not enough, of the difference, while a shortage of critical minerals -- copper, cobalt, tin, manganese, titanium -- limits the scale of many industrial undertakings.
For ordinary people -- and only somewhat less so for the elites of the planet's heavily militarized states -- survival is a constant struggle. Outside of the industrialized power centers, life involves a daily search for food, water, and energy of any sort, as well as whatever precious goods (gems, weapons, bits of technology) might be traded to get those basics. For the big corporations and their government sponsors, as they send the Scullys and Quadritches to the distant corners of the planet to enforce their will, the struggle is no less fierce for control of the world's few remaining deposits of oil, natural gas, coal, copper, and uranium.
In 2144, only five areas of the world still possess any significant reserves of oil and natural gas: Russia (and contiguous areas of the former Soviet Union), the Persian Gulf, West Africa (including Nigeria), the Orinoco basin of Venezuela, and the now long ice-free Arctic. Even these areas have been substantially depleted, giving the remaining deposits staggering value to whichever country or company controls them. If these are not quite as valuable as "unobtanium," the rare metal being plundered from Pandora and brought back to Earth, they are close enough to be thought of as "barely-obtanium."
Life (and Death) on a Depleted Planet
For the record, I'm being an optimist here for the sake of Avatar: Earth's Last Stand. Based on my own assessment of planetary energy resources, I doubt that any oil or natural gas worth drilling for will remain in 2144. But for narrative purposes, if such deposits are to be found anywhere almost a century and a half from now, the likely candidates are: the Persian Gulf area because it still possesses the world's largest combined reserves of oil and natural gas, and so probably will be the last to run out; Russia, Africa, and the Orinoco basin because they have to date been spared intensive exploitation by the major Western firms, and so still retain substantial recoverable reserves; and the Arctic, which will only become fully accessible to oil producers when global warming has melted the ice cap.
Given the tripartite global power structure of 2144, Russian oil and gas reserves will have been divided between the North European Alliance, controlling western Siberia and the Caucasus, and Greater China, garrisoning eastern Siberia and Central Asia. The Arctic will be a constant source of conflict among all three blocs, with periodic fighting breaking out concerning overlapping territorial claims in the region. That leaves the Persian Gulf, West Africa, and Venezuela -- the sites of constant warfare between the Na'vi of this planet and the various expeditionary forces sent out by the three big power blocs which, often in temporary alliances of convenience, will also be fighting each other.
Already, we can get a sense of what this might look like. Under its ultra-nationalist president Hugo Chávez, Venezuela has sought to distance itself from its traditional client, the United States, and bolstered its ties with Russia and China. As part of this effort, Venezuela has purchased billions of dollars worth of arms from Russia and forged a strategic energy alliance with China. Claiming evidence of a U.S. plan to invade his country, Chávez has also conducted sizeable self-defense maneuvers and strengthened the military's control over ports and other infrastructure.
Looking into the future, one can imagine a time, some decades distant, when Venezuela is a satellite of Greater China and its deposits of heavy oil -- the largest remaining on the planet -- are reserved for China's exclusive use. Under these circumstances, it is not hard to imagine a move by the North American Federation to oust the prevailing Venezuelan regime by launching an invasion on a remote stretch of coast and striking out for the capital, Caracas. The Venezuelans, backed up by Chinese expeditionary forces, might manage to halt the invasion, but fail to dislodge the North Americans, holed up in harsh patches of the countryside. Brutal fighting might follow -- the "mean bush" mentioned by Quaritch in Avatar. Jake Scully, sent back into this gruesome contest for his third deployment, is gravely wounded and barely survives the trek back to safety.
If Venezuela is still a peaceful land today, Nigeria is already conflict-ridden and certainly destined to be a major battlefield in the unending resource wars of a future planet. Possessing the largest pool of untapped oil and natural gas in Africa, it is already the site of a fierce competitive economic struggle involving the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union, all of which seek to exploit the nation's energy riches. Nigeria's oil and gas reserves were first developed by Royal Dutch Shell and British Petroleum (now BP) -- a legacy of the country's past as a British colony - but now American, Chinese, and European firms have acquired drilling rights to valuable hydrocarbon deposits. Russia, too, has entered the scene, promising to help build a natural gas pipeline from the Niger Delta in southern Nigeria across the Sahara to the Mediterranean coast for eventual shipment to Europe.
Nigeria is also a battlefield today. Disgruntled inhabitants of the Niger Delta area, where most of the country's oil is produced and few benefits are ever seen, have taken up arms in a struggle to receive a bigger share of the nation's oil revenues. Both the United States and China are competing to provide the Nigerian government with military aid to defeat the insurgents, hoping to strengthen their respective positions in the country's oil fields in the process.
Again, it's not much of a stretch to imagine a scenario in which, 134 years from now (or a lot sooner), Nigeria has fallen under the sway of Greater China or the North American Federation and Colonel Quaritch and his cohort are carrying out combat operations in the Delta's jungle regions, a setting not so unlike Pandora's, with obvious Cameron-esque possibilities.
Where else might Scully, Quaritch, and their buddies be sent to fight? As a start, don't assume that the current fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan will simply end or that the United States will ever willingly withdraw its forces from a whole string of bases in the Persian Gulf area. As long as the United States obtains part of its oil from the region -- and the North American Federation might still be fighting to do so in 2144 -- U.S. forces are likely to remain. Given the historic enmities that divide the region and a widespread antipathy to the U.S. presence, don't be surprised if North American Federation forces are still in battle there deep into the twenty-second century.
Finally, the warming Arctic, not currently on the global conflict map, could also experience warfare as it attracts major oil and gas drilling operations. The region also houses some of the world's last remaining indigenous communities that still practice a traditional way of life, and which will undoubtedly face the sort of habitat-destroying invasions pictured in Avatar.
Still, as Cameron imagined, despite constant warfare, the North American Federation (like the other major power centers) will, by 2144, still find itself in desperate need of vital materials, no longer easily available on this planet. Economic conditions, even for privileged elites, will by then be deteriorating rapidly. It is in this context that the giant mining corporations might join in a fabulously expensive bid to use space travel to replenish the planet's resources, voyaging to distant Pandora to extract its precious supply of unobtanium, a miraculous new source of energy.
It's not that hard to imagine just such a future world if we continue on our present course toward ever greater resource consumption, increased carbon emissions, and the militarization of resource dependency. Can you doubt that the movie Cameron and I would make, Avatar: Earth's Last Stand, would be both gripping and spectacular? It would be an amazing, if tension-producing place to visit in 3-D. Here's the only catch: you wouldn't want to live there.
- Posted in




73 Comments so far
Show AllI would much rather see a movie that depicted a na'vi-like deep resonance between humans and sentient trees / plants. trees and plants speak (and listen), via vibration; they feel and know so much.
our world would be different if more people were connected (through vibration) to the natural world. an equally dramatic movie could be made about the ways we can connect to plants and how it would massively change our experience here.
this is the movie I want to see!
Check out the film The Cove, while not specifically about trees it speaks to something the status quo Democrats and Republicans cannot comprehend.
Last night, I watched The Cove. And, I agree -- the status quo Democrats and Republicans don't get it! And, this movie is 100% real and relevant to our lives today!
I'd like to see both your movie and the one Michael Klare describes ... in fact I wish all movies were more like these, and less like "Valentines Day."
Avatar about planet Pandora, was a great movie for me because it is obvious it relates to the world now.
Pandora is here.
People are realizing we are living in the same Pandora's Box that our Bankster military machine, with Obama's help, is preparing for the Middle East and around the planet.. more government in Pandora's Box.
We are in the Box now, and now is everywhere... we are insiders of the box.
When Leon Panetta's CIA was warned "don't open Pandora's Box" by letting the truth be known, now I see what they mean is "don't let the people know they are in the machine's Box".
Wouldn't it be great if war movies would replace war?
Science fiction always involves a "gimmee." In this case, the gimmee is the space travel itself, a feat unexplained coming from a resource-starved Earth. The fact is that no kind of conventional travel can ever get us to another star system, regardless of light-speed limits. Only engaging in the most extensive co-operative research project in history to develop unconventional quantum travel can take us to another star system. If others are visiting us, this is certainly the method they are using, although it involves centuries of development with no prospect of profits, only survival. Enjoy my sci-fi book on the subject:
http://home.roadrunner.com/~markwrede/Fiction/TARAKAYANA.pdf
Wow! Very interesting -- if very scary -- scenarios sketched out here. Thanks for the mind-expansion! Your prequel has my vote.
How many millions of acts of kindness are taking place every one hour around this world, acts of generosity, acts of helpfulness? How many words of love are being spoken?
Herein lies the power, as it grows and spreads, that is going to transform this world and its people.
A Divine Intercession took place in this world in October 1981.
In Wrath of Word, come among here, all have been given the actual power to obliterate human life on this planet.
Each and every one is now a destroyer or a savior. Which will it be?
The time is near when all will clearly understand that to murder one person is the same as having murdered every person on this earth.
Many will come to love by way of fear. Many will cease to speak forever.
When we leave this Planetary Mind Realm (The whole thing is MiND, is: the matter of it all.) and return to the Pleroma, we are going to be taken up the time/history of this universe (we will be in it but not of it, of it but not in it) all the way back to where the matter of this universe first appeared, through this, across the approach and into the Beginning.
Never before, ever after.
I have seen this Beginning. In such enormity there is no enormity.
Another ice age is coming.
Sioux Rose
LELAND: The most dangerous ice age to be currently feared exists in the hearts of those who own the temporal power to plan the development and deployment of yet more bombs that readily turn precious children into blood and guts spilled across the wounded earth for no purpose... other than that of satisfying the dark ego games of those who would play god, owing to their access to an absolute power that has corrupted them absolutely while freezing their humanity.
1st Hermit, year 1: We are here in heaven.
2nd Hermit, year 2: We are here in hell.
3rd Hermit, year 3: We are not here.
4th hermit, year 9: All yer gonna do is argue, I'm outa here.
There was the great out-breath, which began when the FIRST THOUGHT of this world came into being. Now, we have entered the in-breath.
That Which Is Intelligence is not a number, not even one. It is not a word. It is not a thought. It aboves all word, beyonds all thought. There is no image in it. Into the Mystery Of Mysteries we cannot go in our thinking, nor will we-souls ever enter therein.
We were never created, but always were and always will be; we are immortal beings.
In the sense that we never die, we are angels.
Who hears me here, hears me there.
Who hears me once, hears me every time.
Your little dharma-talk start off on fairly solid Buddhist ground, then you blew it with new-ageish talk about immortality.
Of course, Buddhism teaches exactly the opposite - all things are impermenent and fleeting. Oddly, the Catholic Church quietly teaches the same thing as churchgoers were reminded of last Wednesday - Ash Wednesday, when they are admonished to remember that all is dust, all is dust, all is dust!
A sentient being's desire to grasp for permanency where there is none, is the suffering talked of in the Buddha'a Second Noble Truth - his Great Diagnosis. The third noble truth provides the guarded prognosis, and the fourth, the prescribed lifetime course of treatments.
Intellectually, I love the clinical logic of Buddhism, even if I haven't been very good following the treatments myself.
Well. Catholicism. I won't even go there. Nothing personal. But they should learn to deal with human sexuality before they can be called grown ups.
Buddhism. Still separation of body and spirit. As if all were not connected.
And 'New agey' isn't valid? Who decides our truth for us? A committee agrees on it?
It is what got us 'here'. I don't think looking backwards for answers is the answer.
Serious Buddhist practice requires celebacy too.
Oh...bummer.
Sioux Rose
It's celibacy, oh, great authority on all religions and esoteric disciplines. You pose as an expert and you're as full of holes as Swiss cheese. Your arrogance is the only thing greater than your capacity to cut others down. I suppose your toilet, or royal throne is gold-plated; or is it made with recycled materials taken from the nuclear power plants you advocate? Gee, with a glowing behind in your next life you can "display" as a Hammadrias Baboon!
Ooooops. I'm outa here!
Nope.
The western notions of separation on body and "spirit" (whatever that is) or ego and body, is dualism, and is specifically a source of suffering and transcending it is what Bhuddist practice is all about.
I am not deciding amyone's "truth" but the word means nothing unless there also exists falsehood, and I am entitled to write as forcefully as I can about if it hurts your feelings, tough. Zen Masters use lots of forcefulness, including physically striking lazy or un-diligent monks.
A good place to start is with some of Alan Watts writings.
Sioux Rose
PJD: Given the sad fact that Phil Hartman is no longer with us, I'd recommend that you try-out for a new take on one of his great character sketches from Saturday Night Live. In your case it would best be done as "The Anal Retentive Spiritual Authority."
You have a way of slicing everyone down whose spiritual epiphany doesn't suit your own narrow grounds for as much. Leland has been moved. When anyone is touched by the Light, their understanding must adapt itself to the language they know.
You take this condescending attitude towards others' spiritual paths, insights, and breakthroughs as if you alone represent some consumate authority. I find cruelty in your comments. They diminish you and whatever spiritual knowledge you purport to possess. And I studied with Buddhist monks IN Nepal, and do NOT see Buddhism as you define it. Not in the least. The Buddhist path entirely embraces reincarnation, so your put-downs of this belief system under the banner of "New Age," when in fact it's quite ancient and LASTING... shows YOUR ignorance.
No, a belief that arrangemetns of stars and planets in the sky could affect human affairs in the least is profound ignorance and superstition.
Of course.
For a site of 'progressive' articles (lots of which are great or at least good), it's nothing short of depressing to have this medieval, superstitious gobbledygook continously being bleated.
And it's a lot worse than just the alignment of heavenly bodies--as bad as that is. It's back to the old medieval Christian crap of having a all-powerful, vindictive, micro-managing god behind the clouds who notes what all of us do and he's going to serve us our just desserts sometime in the future if we're not good. And to call this braindead, twisted gibberish... karma!!! of all silliness.
No wonder the 'left' is such a mess.
Sioux Rose
You two earth-bound babboons can kiss my cosmic ass.
As I progressive, I consider your comment to be what is indeed destroying the left.
You choose to attack their person, not their argument. How does that make you better than the likes of Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and their fellow nut jobs?
Unless you can come up with scientific proof that astrology and Buddhism actually have any effect on earth, you are in your own little world. And that is the exact opposite of what the left should be ... the left should use real facts and evidence, not spirituality without the backing of objective science.
Indeed, that is what distinguishes the left from the right; the left uses real fact. The right just uses emotion, instinct, and conclusions arrived before fact to seduce people. Not to mention the left generally use these facts for the common good.
Sioux Rose
CHRIS: I don't know if you're new to the forum, or one of the troll tag team's accomplices using a new screen name. I am a PAID professional in this field, and I have already spelled out these items MANY times in the forum. That's MY time and energy freely shared. However, I get tired of repeating myself, and those who have read the comments (many have liked them enough to post as much) get tired, too.
Your "scientific proof" demand is ludicrous. The mystical realm does not conform to the metrics of materialistic science. And anyone who "introduces" themselves to me by attacking me is not going to win my time or explanations.
What have you published lately? My field has been castigated for centuries. Those, like myself, who commit themselves to this line of research, counseling, and inquiry deserve respect. Your condescension is NOT earned. You are NOT my peer. I defer to those who know more than I do about certain fields of science, history, mechanical engineering. I am an expert (there are two or three others with some knowledge of this subject who occasionally post) in a field that is misunderstood. You sound ignorant, too, by conflating astrology with Buddhism. My point was about reincarnation.
Opinions are not all equivalent. Those who haven't traveled, studied, or seriously read up on subjects are not prepared to debate those with knowledge. You have insulted me, and I will remember you. Don't expect me to respond to your posts with grace. If you have been on this site for any length of time you would have seen that I have PATIENTLY put forth very well-constructed arguments. Check the archives.
Sioux Rose
P.S. Your comment that my post is "destroying the left" is a classic Rush Limbaugh/ Fox news level of response. First of all, it's intolerant. Are you sure you don't want to also blame gays, lesbians, and feminists? Or how about burning witches, that's probably up your alley. Interesting that instead of defending me when two males attacked me, one of which has done so on REPEATED occasions, you take THEIR defense. Have a Mommie Dearest problem, do you?
And the word it's is not possessive. It is the contraction for it is, genius girl.
Your comment was totally reasonable, and right on the mark. Part of the problem of the left is that it attracts all kinds of cranky, self-serving weirdos (to be frank) who make it next to impossible for all the rest who simply want to work reasonably at improving democracy and the sharing of available resources to improve the lives of the billions who have difficult or awful lives.
Siouxrose attacked you viciously and stupidly, accusing you of nasty bigotry and trying to associate your reasonable comment to racism, etc. That is projection on her part, all done with her usual total lack of logic.
Siouxrose is indeed, as she grandiosely and pompously claims, a professional. She earns her living (such as it is, by her own admission) by selling ridiculous superstitious ‘services’ and she trolls Common Dreams for clients. Here is her website: http://www.siouxrose.com/astrological.services.html
************************************
Following is off her website:
“She is an extremely accurate astrologer. Her sessions usually last one hour and in that time she will carefully explain planetary influences of the various aspects of your life. If time allows, she will also do tarot reading and some numerology.
Sioux prefers to do most readings during the day but for people with an inflexible work schedule, she is willing to do evening or weekend readings.
Understand your natal chart
Career guidance
Yearly transit profile
Relocation services
Relationship compatibility
Career issues”
******************************************
It doesn't require an Einstein to figure out that you don't get help with the basic difficult aspects of your life with 'reading' cards and looking at the planets
Also, I obviously have deep problems with people who claim that the problems with the planet are due to our bad relationship with the gods, and that by some happy coincidence, these same people can make life better if we will give them $$$. No difference between that and the ugly nastiness of ‘traditional’ religion that scares the crap out of people with their vindictive heavenly divinity, hell, etc., and the obvious scam of promising salvation (or whatever) for a price.
Check out the pompous UPPER CASE declarations of her importance, that pretty much amount to delusions of grandeur.
If you’re new to Commondreams, you may not know that she posts enough to make you suspect that there’s not a lot else going on in her life, and she has a laughable ‘mother hen’ sense of proprietary entitlement on the site, as if we have to bow to her ‘seniority’ and seek her approval because in the last decade she has posted the equivalent word count of War and Peace in ridiculous, superstitious gibberish.
This should be a site of reasonable comments on the articles. She drags everything to the level of her new-age superstitious silliness and uses CD as free advertising for her superstitious point of view, and therefore indirectly for her ‘services’.
Hilarious, simply hilarious. I thank you for it because I had a deep belly laugh that doesn't come often enough. Absolutely seriously, you are hilarious with your insults.
I honestly think you missed your calling: comedian.
Actually, i enjoyed Avatar. But i didn't find it particularly profound.
Dances With Wolves said about the same thing and i recognized some exact parallels. And also.
Violence was still 'the way'. High tech versus low tech. Masculine principle vs. feminine principle. In violence. It could have avoided this and been truly innovative and creative. But audiences like fighting.
My favorite piece was when the heroic figure was imploring the nature goddess to be on 'their' side. And he was told that she doesn't take sides. She just supports the 'Balance'.
I think District Nine, which i am happy to find is nominated as well, is far more substantial.
Just my two cents.
Avatar was a sham -though I still enjoyed it- I hope it doesn't win anything. Like you said, "District Nine" was a hundred fold better...as was the "Hurt Locker." Ill be rooting for both of them, instead.
"Actually, i enjoyed Avatar. But i didn't find it particularly profound."
I agree with both observations, enjoying the movie even though I am 3D defective (strabismus). I did have a few 3D experiences of the extreme foreground, the first being when the camera pans back to Colonel Quaritch weight lifting.
What I particularly enjoyed was the biology depicted for Pandora. Also it was good to see a society that treated the planet and its resources as sacred, much as "primitive" human cultures did before a priesthood class developed that found a route to power by developing other foci for the human numinous experience.
"The priesthood class....." Well said, Prof!
All so called authorities on the nature of reality. Always taking our own direct experiences away - through negation and undermining our trust in ourselves.
What Klare describes was put into print in Richard Heinberg's first two books about Peak Oil--"The Party's Over" and "Power Down," and is called the "Last Man Standing" scenario. Heinberg recently wrote about that scenario, which can be read here, http://heinberg.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/213-china-or-the-u-s-which-will-be-the-last-nation-standing/
IMO, Klare places the events he describes too far into the future. Even in our Great Recession, the amount of net-oil exports is declining, a phenomena that has pushed crude oil back to the $80 level. The pool of available exports is predicted to continue to shrink and will likely cause a major crisis by 2020, if not earlier. For info about net exports and the Export Land model (ELM) detailing it, this link is the place to start, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_Land_Model
It should be followed by going to this link, http://www.theoildrum.com/tag/export_land_model which houses an achive of postings related to ELM.
There's another line of discussion I want to address regarding Klare's essay, but that will have to wait until later today. For others short on time, the first linked item is the place to start. It confrims we face a very dangerous situation given how the US federal government is being used unless we can regain control over it and dismantle the US Empire. This is very serious stuff, which cannot be emphasized enough.
If we cannot stop global climate change and hit a climate tipping point that catastrophically alters the entire atmosphere, the planet will be a hell of a lot LESS inhabitable than in Klare's scenario far sooner than 134 years from now.
Actually, I was thinking it will take longer. As someone with geology training and an interest in history, I always find it amusing that Americans find 140 years to be a long period of time. There are pubs in the UK that have been open for more than a 1000 years.
The challenge of addressing AGW and even more serious global ocean acidification will be to get people and institutions to care about the consequences of their actions, even when those consequences are thousands of years in the future.
I don't think that either geology or history has a very good track record for either quantifying or even giving a qualitative sense of the rate of change, and this applies as equally to the rate of change of geological changes as it does to social changes.
So while I appreciate your argument that change often takes much longer than most people recognize, my opinion at this point is that the rate of environmental change is vastly accelerating, and so past performance is not necessarily a good predictor of future results, to steal a line investment bankers often use.
Thousands of years in the future? You're dreaming. I'd be surprised if the entire planet wasn't a wasteland of dust by the year 2144. Geologically it will look pretty much the same, but the life living on the surface will be dramatically changed, and probably will be lacking many, if any humans.
Sioux Rose
WILDCARD: Great post although your argument (as per the inability to make sound predictions based on factors applicable to the past) challenges the conclusion set forth in your final paragraph. I think the capacity for change, both on the human end ("Necessity is the Mother of invention" style) as well as on the part of the natural world will generate some surprises. Good and bad.
You completley misunderstood my point. My point is that few people seem to have any sense of deep-time. So, you are misinterpreting my remarks about it taking 1000 years as playing down the seriousness of the problem. I am saying nothing of the sort!
The unadaptable consequences of our present-day economy - ocean acidifications and the death of nearly all aerobic sea life, runaway methane-release driven global heating and de-oxygenizaton of the atmosphere, will take longer than 130 years. Ther are analogues to this in the geologic record. But, It does not matter in the least if the irreversable consequences of our actions take several million years. The action we take NOW is exactly as important.
"There are pubs in the UK that have been open for more than a 1000 years."
Not many, my local when I lived there only dated back to 1634 and so was 26 years younger than the high school I attended.
But I agree with wildcard that we are seeing an accelerating rate of change that is noticeable within a single lifetime. While I appreciate your comment about geological time some changes are thought to have been geologically instantaneous, such as the refilling of the Mediterranean basin when the Straits of Gibralter reopened about 5 million years ago.
Yes, but, aside fron volcanic eruptions and asteroid impacts, "geologically instantaneous" can still mean a thousand years. Even with stupendous flowage through the straits, the Mediteranean must have still taken at least a couple hundred years to fill up.
I think you'd find "Noah's Flood" by Ryan and Pitman very interesting; I certainly did. Alibris has used copies under $3.
I picked olives on a tree on Crete in 1979 that very likely was around at the time of Jesus. The tree was not that high--12 to 15ft., but it was extremely big... like 6 to 8ft. in diameter.
I agree with you that here in N. America, we have such tight little time frames. The earth likely still has a few centuries, at least of life, likely humans as well, regardless of what happens. We're in trouble but I wouldn't be surprised if we still had centuries left, admittedly with increasing choas and devastation.
I was on Crete in 1998; it's an historian's Mecca. What I learned there I never read in any text or heard in any lecture. And the many ruins there will stand long after our "civilization" turns into something else. But the Minoans didn't rely on fossil fuels for the basis of their economy and life-support systems; their societal complexity was several orders of magnitude less than ours of today. Indeed, the Minoan civilization will outlast fossil fuel-based industrial civilization by many centuries.
The vast majority of people fail to appreciate the importance of energy in the form of fossil fuels for our "civilization." It/they is/are even more fundamental than money--the imense amounts of circulated money and accumulated wealth wouldn't exist without energy, for it was enegy that created both. As the amount of energy available for use declines, the amounts of circulated money and accumulated wealth will also decline. This decline can be mitigated by constructing energy generating machines powered by the planet and its sun, but the total energy available to use will still decline, and thus money and wealth. This is a major part of the future missing from Klare's scenario. Capitalist growth must have an ever expanding energy/money supply or else it collapses upon itself. The post-WW2 UK Depression is an example of this. The most energy dependent country on the planet is the USA, and its reduced energy flows are already causing a decline in living standards.
There's still more to say about this, but it will have to wait until morning.
pjd412 and others will enjoy this website, http://www.scotese.com/Default.htm It's the Paleomap Project which illustrates the tectonic evolution of the continents and the evolution of climate, both of which are linked to where hydrocarbon deposits developed in the past and their likely locations today. This knowledge is required to understand what sort of fossil fuels if any are to be found in the Arctic Ocean Basin or under Greenland's ice sheet. This site provides us with two maps of the Arctic region showing potential locations of recoverable oil and NatGas, http://benmuse.typepad.com/arctic_economics/2008/07/arctic-oil-and-gas.html To complete the picture, this site gives us a wonderful Arctic Ocean Bathymetry Map that allows us to see where the continental crust ends and the ocean basin begins, http://geology.com/world/arctic-ocean-bathymetry-map.shtml
Arctic Ocean Sea Bed territorial claims are based on the extent of continental crust. You will recall in 2007 Russia planted its flag at the bottom of the Actic Ocean at the North Pole, claiming the Lomonosov Ridge to be an extension of Russia (This shows where the ridge is and has a good discussion of implications, http://benmuse.typepad.com/ben_muse/2007/08/the-race-for-th.html ). After viewing the various maps, it's clear why they planted their flag. But just what will they find? USGS studies are greatly flawed due to political influence based on the percieved need to discount the reality and timing of the Peak Oil phenomenon; so, the two referenced maps must be viewed skepticly. Deposits will be found and already have in Russia's region, while the Norwegians are busy in the northern end of the North Sea trying to extend their operations. In regards to all this, the US Empire is at a great disadvantage for not ratifying the Law of the Sea, which is what gives Norway, Russia and the UK the basis for their claims and those of others in non-Actic regions.
So competition over this last remaining hydrocarbon frontier has already begun. This last component renders the timeline espoused by Klare to be too far into the future. The Last Man Standing scenario we already appear to be following will likely foment a crisis before 2020 unless the belligerent path of the US Empire can be derailed, curtailed, ended, or whatever word you'd like to use for it to STOP. The coming crisis relates to energy and its underpinning of the financial basis for capitalism and will decimate jobs related to descresionary income, a process already occurring. And there is absolutely no way the vast overextension of the financial system's derivatives will ever be made whole as there's not enough enegy resources to fuel the additional economic growth required. This will have quite different effects on nations's societies depending on their complexity, reliance on fossil fuels, and dependence on the current global financial achitecture.
I can understand why Klare used Avatar as the vehicle for his message. And while the environmental aspects are placed somewhat appropriately time-wise, the energy and related financial crises that will cause the collapse of capitalism are very realistic in the next decade; so, his placement of them too far in the future is not helpful at all.
I may not completely agree with your conclusions and timelines but, excellent comments and great references. Thank you.
Thanks for taking the time to reply as I often wonder if anyone bothers to look at the refernces I post; if one does, then I deem the effort worthwhile.
I found it disappointing that Pandora had precisely the necessary native animal life to counter the foreign transported weaponry...too easy...not a resolution...
yes, Dances With Wolves was vastly superior, and wonderfully free of digital crapola...much more honest...painfully...
Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee...
Two people I know well made similar comments to me about the film. I did not see Avatar, and therefore, I can't comment on the film -- here in NYC, the price tag is $20 per ticket. That is, I believe, a corporate price tag!
Tell me, again, the message of the film!?!
You are only seeing half the movie. The 3d effects were especially useful in communicating the spiritual aspects of the film. Our problem is not just that we are ecologically destructive, it is that we are so BECAUSE we have so lost touch with true spirituality that we are...well...an insane species.
I understand your complaint. That part of the film was simply meant to point to the idea that the planet itself - Gaia, in its more mystical connotations as the Anima Mundi or World Soul - is intelligent and conscious, and we humans are like neurons in the planetary mind. You might not like such an idea, but millions of us do and find the film inspiring. The 3d world of Pandora is an intimation of the entheogenic shamanic cosmos, or can be, and is, looked at that way by many. There have been many blogs and threads online about the spiritual aspects of the film.
Kitaj, while i agree with you in principle, i think the film itself didn't do enough with the concepts of planetary consciousness. It was overpowered by other aspects of the film.