EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Breaking: Coalfield Uprising Grows, More Sit-ins: Will Feds Take Down WVA's Embarrassing DEP?
This might be a first in the country: The failed West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection is emerging as such an embarrassingly pro-coal anti-mountain public relations nightmare for Gov. Joe Manchin that even retired coal miners have taken to the streets against the state's environmental regulators, calling on the federal EPA and Office of Surface Mining to take over the key duties of the dysfunctional state agency.
The uprising in the Appalachian coalfields against failed state government action on mining policy is growing--today, coalfield residents took their protests directly to ground zero of the state's regulatory failure.
Following 12 previous protests and civil disobedience actions in the Appalachian coalfields this spring and summer, a contingent of four protesters locked themselves to the WV DEP doors in a nonviolent sit-in. Four protesters were reportedly arrested.
While the WVA Department of Environmental Protection carried out the "Blaster's Exam" today, as part of its unfettered support for mountaintop removal mining and the daily detonation of 3.5 million pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives in historic mountain communities, scores of fed up coal miners and coalfield residents also rallied at the agency's office this morning. The protesters presented an embarrassingly long list of the agency's failure to hold up its mandate to protect and restore the environment, ensure water quality, and enforce strip mining, and demanded the resignation of WV DEP Secretary Randy Huffman.
According to the coalfield residents, the DEP has failed to hold mining operators accountable for violations, refused to thoroughly address the potential dangers of coal slurry injection and to set permit limits for abandoned mine site discharge, and misled residents on regulatory actions.
The protestors posted condemnation signs: "Closed Due to Incompetence" and "Department of Encouraging Pollution."
"The WVDEP ignores or dismisses citizen complaints and refuses to exercise their duty to shut down operations with repeat violations or to deny permits to operators with outstanding violations," retired West Virginia coal miner Chuck Nelson declared. "It is imperative that we restore the enforcement of all mining laws, so that citizen's civil and human rights are upheld, and our families and homes are protected from the impacts of mining, and from the hazards of industrial waste."
On Monday, August 10, in a rare call for federal intervention in this growing national emergency, coalfield citizen groups including Coal River Mountain Watch, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, along with the Sierra Club and the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment, formally petitioned the OSMRE to withdraw approval of the state's surface mining program and substitute federal enforcement. The petition concludes:
"Given West Virginia's refusal to enforce the law in the face of coal industry interests, we believe that the only remedy that will protect the State's essential environmental resources is for OSM to substitute federal enforcement, in whole or in part, of the state's surface mining program."
The entire petition can be seen here: http://wvgazette.com/static/coal%20tattoo/bufferzonepetition.pdf
Earlier this month, the EPA actually announced its intention to exert greater scrutiny over the WVDEP process of permit applications received for surface mining operations "with valley fills".
Testifying last month at the first bipartisan US Senate hearing on mountaintop removal in a generation, DEP Secretary Huffman stunned the crowd by chucking his environmental protection mandate out the window and openly defended the reckless part of West Virginia's Big Coal economy beholden to devastating mountaintop removal operations. Huffman defiantly lectured the US Senators: "West Virginia and the nation need jobs and coal. Nothing in the debate over mountaintop mining debate is going to change that in the short term."
As if offended by the ancient mountain range and lush hardwood deciduous forests in our nation's carbin sink of Appalachia, the mountain state's top environmental regulator then depicted West Virginia mountains as "steep, hostile terrain."
Hostile terrain? What happened to "Wild and Wonderful"? Or the state motto, montani semper liberi?
This was not the first time for Huffman to declare his horror of the mountains--in the mountain state.
On April 20, Huffman made an extraordinary admission in an interview with the West Virginia Public Radio, declaring that the mountains impeded the state's development, and therefore, needed to be destroyed through mountaintop removal.
"Mainly what we're concerned about as regulators is the ability to develop land after mining," he said. "You need valley fills if you're going to have a viable post mining economy. You need flat land. And in order to have flat land you need to have valley fills, and one of our biggest concerns is that EPA is wanting to reduce the size and number of valley fills in Appalachia."
The radio interview is here:http://www.wvpubcast.org/newsarticle.aspx?id=9248
As the state's top environmental regulator, Huffman apparently failed to read the EPA's 2002 EIS report that "it is unlikely that any more than 2 to 3% of the future post-mining land uses will develop land uses such as housing, commercial, industrial, or public facility development" after mountaintop removal operations.
In fact, Huffman and the WVDEP have apparently failed to consider a lot of basic environmental and human rights issues in the coalfields, none more critical than the impact of injecting coal slurry in underground mines. In the face of overwhelming scientific evidence of contaminated leakages of toxic coal slurry into watersheds and wells, Huffman brazenly told an AP reporter this spring: ""We studied specifically the possibility the slurry injection had migrated into the water, and there's not a geologic connection between where it was stored and where their problem is."
Despite Huffman's denial, scientific tests on water samples contaminated by coal slurry this spring " found six metals--antimony, arsenic, lead, barium, cadmium and chromium--in levels that exceeded federal standards for primary drinking water at one or more sites."
The study is at the Coal Tattoo blog: http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/03/19/citizen-slurry-study-ii/
Charleston Gazette reporter Ken Ward has filed numerous stories on Huffman's "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy on coal slurry injections:
http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/05/29/wvdeps-dont-ask-dont-te...
http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/07/15/citizens-say-wvdep-inco...
Here's a chart of coal slurry injection sites:
For more information on coal slurry issues, see: http://www.sludgesafety.org/coal_slurry_inj.html
"The WVDEP simply fails to adequately regulate the coal industry," said Rock Creek resident Lorelei Scarbro. "When WVDEP Secretary Randy Huffman runs off to lobby the EPA to grant illegal valley fill permits, he's abdicated his responsibility to the people. Corporate coal influence has become so great inside the WVDEP that he has become a public relations spokesperson for the coal industry instead of an enforcer of mining laws and regulations."
"We will not sit idly by today while the WVDEP is granting blasting certifications for coal companies to demolish our mountains and ruin our homes and communities," said Bo Webb of Naoma. "It is time for Huffman to resign or be fired. He's derelict in his duties and grossly incompetent at best. Quite possibly a case for criminal negligence could be made."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


19 Comments so far
Show AllJeez, I think that Huffman is lucky nobody shot him yet. That's even more arrogant and blatant dictatorship than Bush and Cheney.
Jeff Biggers' reporting is to be commended.
This article addresses the important issue of development being promoted as the end-all-be-all for the West Virginia economy. It is part of a larger problem, which is that our policymakers are equating widespread commercial, industrial and residential development as necessary for a decent quality of life and American "progress."
Livable communities must be created from the bottom-up, by residents themselves.
The sort of widespread development being promoted by federal, state and local policymakers- a model that includes mass-produced buildings constructed with largely cheap, often toxic materials, by unskilled or minimally-skilled labor- needs to be halted by new policies.
This is true whether the state in reference is West Virginia, New York or Arizona.
Despicable, horrendous, unconscionable...whatever adjectives you wish to apply.
But it's futile, because it doesn't go to the heart of the matter--the "perceived" need for coal to fuel power plants.
Remove this need by replacing coal technology to produce electricity with a cleaner, cheaper one based on renewables, and the problem will be solved.
http://vortexengine "Plan B" for clean, renewable and inexhaustible supplies of electricity.
http://vortexengine.ca
Can renewable energy sources provide a steadily increasing demand for electric v coal, natural gas or nuclear plants?
Can people do without 60 inch plasma TVs, iPods that run movies, books in electronic form?
zmann, I seriously feel you should remove "books in electronic form" from your list :)
While you may have your own preference for paper books over electronic, I truly feel that electronic readers can be extremely beneficial to the environment. I'm not just talking about Amazon's 'Kindle' or Sony's 'Reader' - both of which do not require battery power except when loading the book or turning a page - I'm talking about the whole concept. Even more so for magazines and daily newspapers. I feel it's a great disrespect to nature to cut down so many trees, add in all those chemicals and dump the waste during paper manufacture - all for what? To print trash or trivial matter that nobody cares about the next day. Wouldn't it be better to have these appear on your screen? Of course, I don't recommend making electronic products that would need to be replaced every year or so - these should have far longer lifetimes and should be completely recyclable.
Well, I mostly just included it because of the Kindle and its ilk are a new class of electronic gadgets that were never really needed, and will now require extra fossil fuels or nuclear power to keep running, as long as we use those power sources.
I take your point about how wasteful so much paper media is. I wonder how much of it uses recycled paper? Do books use recycled paper?
While I prefer to read periodicals online, I think books are as great as trees and can last longer than trees if cared for properly. I buy all my books used and of hundreds I have owned only a couple fell apart and ended up in a landfill.
If I were a tree I'd be proud to become a book, if it was a good one. I think most paper waste comes from business and industry. Lawyers also waste so much paper it's not funny.
Check out geothermal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power
I propose an online voter initiative and referendum to make coal companies pay for damages to health, environment and economy.
Zmann - control of what others are allowed to enjoy, means control of what you are allowed to enjoy.
Ezeflyer - organize the online voter initiatives and referendums yourself. Don't wait for somebody else to get it going.
You too can be reported to flag@whitehouse.gov (that ought to be .stazi, or kgb, etc)
Mr. Shaws,
Do you believe that a thing called "society" exists? Do you not believe that as a member of a society, that there are implied obligations to that society? Are you not a freeloader or a leech otherwise?
Have you ever thought that the end-stage of your "libertarian" philosophy can be seen in places like El Salvador, or Honduras, where all wealth concentrates in very few hands and the rest live in misery and virtual slavery? What homeostatic mechanisms exist in a dog-eat-dog libertarian society that prevent wealth from concentrating in very few hands? Remember wealth = power (to obtain more wealth) = more wealth = more power, without limit.
Conversely, how do you explain the obviously superior standard of living, freedom, leisure, and educational and cultural attainment enjoyed in "socialist" counties like Scandinavia, France, or the UK?
These monsters are making such a gigantic carbon footprint that we will need to eat our children just to ballance it out.
What happened to "Wild and Wonderful"?
That slogan has been retired, hasn't it?
The new slogan, seen on huge signs on interstate routes crossing into the state is "West Virginia - Open for Business" The big letters being superimposed over a panorama of the rugged southern coalfield terrain - not, say, the Charleston downtown financial district or the Morgantown "high tech corridor" - making it clear exactly what kind of business they are promoting.
The idea of a State DEP Secretary lobbying for the businesses he regulates is a breathtaking conflict of interest - right out of a banana republic.
Gee pjd you are really off the reservation! Do you propose that your fellow citizens should be told how to be what to have.
You prefer totalitarian states, oligarchies as in such failed states in Russia.
You better define libertarian if we are to continue this discourse.
And gee golly wiz, wva is and has been controlled by dem's - Sens Byrd and Rockeffler.
Individual liberty to pursue one's enlightened best interest is the best hope for us or any other society.
Your over reliance on gvt will continually leave you disappointed.
What's so great about Sweden, France and etc. Do live in either or similar?
I'm all for individual liberty. But I suppose your freedom ends where my nose begins, right? That's why we have laws against littering, polluting, heck, even against spitting in public places.
Alcyon
Yup, personal liberty to swing your hand stops at another's nose.
Societies organize themselves to specify what they (Christian/Judaic) consider to be acceptable behavior - no spitting, littering, etc.
Some societies (Islamic) think honor killings are okay, that females are property. Makes "...ends where my nose begins..." seem small potatoes.
But I much prefer an "at my nose.." society, how about you?
>>>Cran Shaws wrote: Societies organize themselves to specify what they (Christian/Judaic) consider to be acceptable behavior - no spitting, littering, etc. Some societies (Islamic) think honor killings are okay, that females are property.
What's your point? I'm scratching my head. Because my screen-name has "Al" as the first syllable, are you assuming I'm a Muslim? Like Aljazeera or Alqaeda? That would be hilarious indeed.