Revisit Carter's Energy Speech
Thirty years ago, on July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter went on national television to give a jolting speech. Billed as an address about the "energy crisis" -- the recent cutoff of Iranian fuel that generated long and angry gas lines at home -- it wound up lashing out at the American way of life. Carter decried Americans' "self-indulgence and consumption" as well as their "fragmentation and self-interest." This was a "crisis that strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will," he asserted.
Today, we should listen to his words again, especially as debates about climate change legislation turn tough and confrontational in the Senate.
Carter, who thought of himself as a moral leader and not just a politician, believed Americans couldn't solve the energy crisis if they didn't move beyond their own self-interest and embrace a common good. He called on Americans to unify themselves around a sense of shared purpose, as they did during a war. "Every act of energy conservation is more than just common sense -- I tell you it is an act of patriotism."
Since then, Carter's speech has been widely condemned for laying the blame for his own failures on the backs of ordinary citizens. Far from it. For a speech that sounded as if it castigated the American way of life, it won Carter huge amounts of support. Immediately after the speech, Carter's poll numbers shot up, something that rarely happened during his presidency. He got more letters than he ever had before, almost all of them positive. Citizens pledged they would ride a bike to work or cut down on unnecessary trips. The counterintuitive happened: The president criticized his fellow citizens but gained their support.
What better time than now to revisit Carter's speech? The Senate is just about to debate a climate change bill that barely squeaked through the House in late June. Many conservative politicians have complained the bill would wind up taxing citizens for the sake of decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels. President Barack Obama's retort has been that the bill would cost less than a postage stamp a day for the average American.
Now's the time for political leaders who support climate change legislation to return to the language Jimmy Carter used and that Obama himself used during his inaugural address. There, Obama warned about economic and environmental crises and then diagnosed "a sapping of confidence across our land." He went on to say: "The challenges we face are real, they are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time."
The language rang with a challenge and with realism and toughness. Obama sounded like a leader who expected something from the American people more than the cost of a postage stamp.
Carter's speech teaches us that this sort of rhetoric can actually work to build political will. Americans are not afraid to hear the tough truths about the problems of unlimited consumerism. They have reservations about how, in Carter's words, "human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns." Good leadership requires tough talk like this; it requires and can succeed if it is honest and realistic.
Unfortunately for us, we understand Carter's speech as one about "malaise," a word that doesn't appear in the speech. Many historians argue that the president was looking for a way to blame citizens for his own problems. But Carter shared the blame in the speech, admitting to his own faults. "I realize that more than ever as president I need your help," he explained, with a sense of humility.
Remembering Jimmy Carter's "Crisis of Confidence" speech (its actual title) today reminds us of important lessons: Tough rhetoric can actually mobilize citizens to action, and leaders can demand and expect sacrifice from citizens.
Most important of all, though, it reminds us that to solve our energy crisis, we need to examine our way of life and confront a culture of consumerism and self-interest. That Carter spoke honestly and found praise for doing so should give Obama grounds for taking Americans into his confidence and arousing them to follow him on moral grounds. Jimmy Carter tried that. His successors can do so, too.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
35 Comments so far
Show AllJimmy Carter was the last true leader of the American people. Since then it has been a downward spiral and probably it is too late now to undue much of the damage. Had we listened to Carter instead of sticking our heads in the Sand and putting Reagan in - so we could go backwards in time - we might be in a position of hope today.
Carter was not perfect but I think he had the best interests of the American people and humanity as a whole at heart. Will we ever have leaders like him again in elected office?
He has done so much since leaving office. Imagine, a president who leads by saying what is right not by saying what people want to hear. TRUE LEADERSHIP!
I read all the comments, no one mentioned possibly Carter's most important legacy: the Carter Doctrine. In a 1980 state of the union address Jimmy Carter proclaimed what was to become known as the "Carter Doctrine":
"Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force* to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force."
*This statement should be amended to include "and any Mid-east country attempting to control its own oil resources contrary to the interests of the US..."
G.H.W. Bush, Clinton, G.W. Bush and continuing now with Obama, all have followed the Carter doctrine.
I agree that Jimmy Carter was better than subsequent presidents, but as he was getting energy from solar panels mounted on top the White House, he was ensuring US control of (via subsequent sanctions, wars and occupations), and our addiction to - oil. We should not look at our history (like this article does) with rose-tinted glasses.
no one mentioned possibly Carter's most important legacy: the Carter Doctrine.
july 15 6:56 pm:
Right - that's why the man laid claim to all Middle East oil with his "doctrine"
>:O(
Jimmy Carter environmental goals were contrary to those of the right wing and energy cartels. Hence they assaulted him with deceptive slander (often subtle) that was unprecidented against a president. Sadly they succeeded by unseating him with a president far more cooperative with their agenda, who then trashed Carter's vital environmental measures through indifference and ignorance.
The damage to our planet resulting from Reagan’s environmental neglect & abuses, followed by those of Bush 1 & especially Bush 2, are incalculable. Unfortunately Clinton, the one president who otherwise might had achieved vital environmental reforms, had to tread lightly to avoid Carter’s fate.
Americans now have a president who appears willing to focus toward countering the snowballing environmental destruction. He must be assured that the vicious assaults that had undone President Carter will not again succeed against him if he is to be effective.
Diesel designed his engine to run on peanut - or hemp - oil.
Carter was a peanut farmer.
I guess there was a conflict of interest issue here.
Right - that's why the man laid claim to all Middle East oil with his "doctrine"
I don't think the man had a conflict of interest. However, his altruistic interests conflicted with American public.
Carter's presidency was sabotaged. He may have been the only honestly altruistic person to hold the office in recent history. Carter had the clarity of vision to recognize the need for sane energy policies. He just made the mistake of speaking honestly to the American public, who were not willing to hear that we should be behaving responsibly. We liked Ronnie Reagan's promise that we could spend our way out of debt -- no matter what lunacy that obviously was. We may have had a chance back in the 1970s to avoid complete disaster, we just weren't willing to change.
LOL ! Carter was nothing but a big talker on energy but it wasn't until Ronald Reagan came in that the energy crisis was solved. If it weren't for Reagan, you Carter lovers would still be complaining about higher gas and energy costs. And to the idiot quickstepper who says Obama has no courage, STFU ! Obama won the liberals, moderates, and conservatives over. Obama has every right to praise Reagan for saving the economy from the disasterous 1970s. Solar panels and wind turbines don't give diddly squat. We need more oil, coal, and natural gas and we're going to get it even if we have to scorch the fucking planet to get it ! Nuclear energy is also a powerful solution to keep up with the world's growing energy demands. Nobody believes in Carter so enough with that sorry loser !
This is amazing- it's hard to fathom these Reagan-worshippers. Reagan laid the path to the disaster we are in today! I agree that only W & Cheney were worse. How divided we really are- it's almost impossible to imagine a good conversation with any of these neo-conservative wingnuts!
Sure, Reagan solved the problem by promising the Islamic revolution in Iran weapons if they would hold the hostages through election day. He assisted in bringing Saddam Hussein to power in Iraq. He helped the mujahadeen in Afghanistan, establishing the CIA training camp that came to be known as al Qaeda. This was how he "solved" the energy crisis, after cutting off funding for solar research on day one of his presidency.
Can you seriously advocate burning the planet in order to keep it powered?
Don't waste your time trying to talk sense to Encino. He's a dyed in the wool right wing fool who I am convinced spends all day worshiping Reagan's dead ass and listening to Limbaugh's BS. He hasn't made sense in a single posting since I've been seeing his name on them.
Those of us with a brain KNOW that Reagan was the second worst president in our lifetimes, beaten out for the post only by W, and that Reagan put us on the path or living in the toilet. He destroyed sectors of this country, stole our wages and our jobs, and drove business into the ultimate greed fest that it is today. If it weren't for the Alzheimer's president, we would never be in the dumpster we are in today.
Carter was a FAR better president than that scum bag Reagan was. Hell, Reagan couldn't even out act the chimp in Bedtime for Bonzo. He sure didn't fool me once during his entire time in office. He sure doesn't do much for my digestion even today. May he rot in a very well deserved hell.
I think Encino is a middle school student whose mother put a block on the channels that carry PG-13 movies, so s/he likes to come here and get a rise out of harassing liberals.
Ignore the little snot.
In 1980 I had come to understand the vision that Jimmy Carter had for this nation and, like many others, I was devastated by the results of the election. It was like the last hope for a better world had been snuffed out. Carter's Christian faith influenced him greatly in recognizing that the world could only survive if nations acted for the greater good of the planet instead of catering only to narrow national interests. The greater good required that we no longer behave as a colonizing power whose ships and planes bring treasures here from all over the world. Instead Carter saw the US as potentially the leading nation in bringing democracy and peace to the world beyond our borders (much in the spirit of the Marshall Plan). In contrast Reagan preached the type of selfishness that spawned the neocon movement--use our military to grab whatever we want. The selfish can easily portray decency as weakness, which is exactly what they did. To this day they cast Carter as a nice guy weak leader who did not know where he was going. The 80 election, I believe, will be remembered by historians 50 years from now as the watershed moment when American voters turned away from nobility and chose Bozo the Clown in a suit of armor.
The "Crisis of Confidence" speech is replayed in the film "Miracle." The plotline gives one the impression that the 1980 US Olympic Hockey Team restored the confidence. But, as Jeremiah claimed, one cannot preach peace when there is none.
This crisis is still being seen in our attachment to militarism, fear of terrorists, and rising gun sales. Will Obama be wise enough to step forward and try to restore our confidence?
The thing about Jimmy was that he spoke to us like we were adults. I appreciated his honesty and his calls for responsibility. He also walked the walk, turning down the thermostats in the white house during winter and actually wearing the sweater that he told us to wear as well. He told the truth, and it didn't matter whether he thought we would like it or not. His own popularity wasn't the first thing on his mind.
Then Reagan came along, telling us to just go ahead and be as wasteful as we could, to hate each other, and to screw each other as much as we wanted for the almighty dollar. To this day I don't understand why he is so worshiped, as he turned us all against each other for the next quarter century.
Jimmy was right, we needed to start acting more responsibly. We needed to get off of foreign oil, we needed to work on alternative energy, we needed to start looking at ourselves as part of the world, instead of the rulers of it all. If we had done that, we would be FAR better off than we are today. Better late than never, but really, it's time to get rid of the idiocy and selfishness of the last 29 years. Until we start heeding the words in this speech, we are doomed to become even more enslaved to big money, who is the ONLY group to be doing well under this system.
Jimmy Carter toasted the Shah of Iran for his commitment to human rights as tear gas deployed against Irani protestors drifted into the White House. Jimmy Carter told the public to blame itself for America's problems and not the government or corporate decision makers. Jimmy Carter increased military spending to the highest levels ever seen, playing the Soviet fear card which enhanced the strength of his political rivals. Jimmy Carter shamed his progressive audience while reaching out for help from Wall Street, making both sides see him as weak – just like Bill Clinton did, and just as Barak Obama is doing.
Bragadoccio persists in politics, but it seems genuine courage in the White House perished on November 22, 1963.
I agree with you on the Shah thing, and at this point, I suspect that Carter would as well. As to the "blaming itself rather than the gov't or the corporate decision makers", it wasn't until Reagan that the serious reversals of corporate responsibilities began to be lifted. As to the increase in defense spending, you do mean UNTIL REAGAN, right? And as to the reaching out to wall street, I can't really comment on that. I wasn't privy to his private conversations.
Was Carter perfect? No, of course not. But he was far better than anyone we've had since. He didn't sell us out to the highest corporate bidder. He didn't lie us into wars. He didn't sit back and let us get attacked on our own soil with out own aircraft. He didn't preside over the greatest deregulation of every industry and environmental safeguard we every put in place. He didn't turn us against ourselves and privatize everything that should be the responsibility of gov't.
Carter's biggest flaw as a leader was that he wasn't enough of an SOB to do things that needed to be done. He tried to run things with cooperation, not realizing that it's blackmail and browbeating that carries the day in DC. He at least tried to be honest with the people of the country, which is a hell of a lot more than ANY of them since have done.
As to Kennedy, I am also a fan of his, but don't forget that there are lots of people around who consider him to be a real problem and a weak minded fool who would rather chase skirts and do drugs than actually run the country. I consider him to be a great president, and in fact, I see the differences between the last two generations to be the difference between the Kennedy era kids and the Reagan era kids. We in the Kennedy era were told to ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. The Reagan era kids were told to go out and get theirs and to hell with everyone else. A rather fundamental difference.
Carter wasn't perfect, none of us is, but he wasn't as bad as you make him out to be.
Carter may not have had perfect energy policies and he may not have fought for hemp but I strongly applaud him for making the valiant efforts to go green and push for it. Ronnie Raygun may have taken down the solar panels off the White House roof but tell me what Democratic president has bothered to restore them. Certainly not Clinton or Obama.
Our country is filled with energy guzzlers who are in total denial mode because they're used to believing that fossil fuels is their life. Deep down though, I'll bet a lot of them know that they're guilty for causing bloodshed on other nations just to steal the oil to continue their blissful ignorance. Global Peak Oil is coming at us and not even the pie-in-the-sky estimates on how much oil is available in Iraq or here or wherever will stop that. It's time to pull our selves out of denial mode and prepare for sustainable ideas by listening to Carter's speech and improving upon it.
Thank you Jimmy Carter !
Papa Bush, Clinton, Dubya and Obomber have all latched on to Raygun's coattails, hoping that some of that charisma will rub off. After all, Raygun is more popular today than he was as president.
raydelcamino: So is Carter more popular than ever today. (America's best former President). Why do you reckon HIS charisma didn't rub off on Obama? Hmm.
I can never forgive Obama for endlessly lionizing Raygun and yet badmouthing the 1960s and 70s back when he was campaigning for president. He's a slick Dubya and Raygun in one !
"The Limits of Power; The End of Amercan Exceptionalism" By Andrew J. Bacevich, Metropolitan Books, N.Y.2008
Mr. Bacevich covers this speech very well in this book, contrasting it directly with the speech Reagan gave a short time later announcing his intention to run for President: the "morning in America" thing. Need-less-to say, no matter how many cards and letter's Carter got in support of what he said, the speech doomed his chances for re-election: a lesson not lost to every politician since which is why Obama is "hotter" to reproduce the Clinton legacy than he is the Carter one.
Americans didn't want to hear about sacrifice or putting their shoulders to the plow then, they don't want to hear about it now.
johnshaplin:
"Americans didn't want to hear about sacrifice or putting their shoulders to the plow then, they don't want to hear about it now."
I'm not so sure about this, I wouldn't want to sell "Americans" short on this issue. Thing about Carter (and not Obama so far) was that he "practiced what he preached" (turned off lights in the White House, ha, ha; rode a bike to work, ha,ha)whereas Obama as usual is all talk and no action. (How much "energy" has he expended in his almost non-stop jet trips to capitols around the world where he basically just gives speeches and garners the applause of breathless admirers?) There's a thing called propaganda of the deed (letting your actions speak for you, the kind of thing that Cynthia McKinney has been doing in Gaza while the President has only speecified about caring for the plight of the Palestinian people.) Before you say Americans won't respond to sacrifice appeals, couldn't our leaders at least to try serving as examples for what they want the public to do, rather than simply preaching at them?
"he (0) basically just gives speeches and garners the applause of breathless admirers"
you nailed him!
In his pre-politics(?) book Dreams From My Father, 0 tells the story of a demo he took part in during his first year at college.
He was to give a speech and be dragged off by some authoritarian types.
(I forget the point of the demo)
As he's speechifying he gets hooked on the adulation of the crowd and, although aware that it was to happen, is most upset when he is hauled away.
He's been moving from one clap-o-meter fix to the next ever since.
vdb: thanks for the anecdote, very apropos. Now I (almost) wish I had read Dreams of My Father; maybe I'll get a round tuit.
I never finished it.
Carter's election prospects looked good until the bottom fell out from under negotiations with Iranians for the hostages. And of course it was the interferance of the Regan team that led to the collapse of those talks. And that treasonous act was what led to Iran/Contra.
Manifest Destiny (endless expansion and aquisition) has been the guiding light for Americans for nearly 200 years. Ronny Raygun drove that point home by removing the photovoltaic panels that Carter had installed on the white house as soon as Raygun became president.
"That Carter spoke honestly and found praise for doing so should give Obama grounds for taking Americans into his confidence and arousing them to follow him on moral grounds."
Unfortunately, Obama has nowhere near the personal courage that Jimmy Carter has exhibited throughout his life.
Whether you agree with Carter or not (and I don't always), you must admit that the man puts his faith into practice.
Whether calling out political thuggery (the Bush/Cheney administration, Israel, etc.) or helping to build houses for the poor (Habitat), Carter has never shied away from what he considers to be the truth. He's right far more often than he's wrong.
He was probably too good a man to be President.
q
I agree with you on Obama having nowhere the courage of Carter. I don't think that any Democratic president or presidential nominee has had any courage since Walter Mondale of 1984. I got to look at Walter Mondale's speeches and debates and I thought that he was braver than even Carter.
Sioux Rose
Perhaps we are confusing courage with integrity? I think the latter has gone missing and is currently a candidate for the "Endangered Species" designation.
I thought Walter Mondale had both of them. I only know so much about him but his honesty in saying that taxes had to be raised was courage in my book even if our electorate fell for reelecting Raygun in 1984 once again. It was sad to watch Mondale lose again in 2002 thanks to the Wellstone tragedy. I'm happy that Franken beat that creep Coleman for now though we'll have to see how Franken does as senator. I hope he doesn't pull another "Obama".
On your last sentence, are you referring to Mondale or integrity in general?
Jennifer: Don't hold your breathe on Franken; from what I've been able to hear he's quite a pro-Israeli war-hawk and quite likely to "pull another Obama." We'll see.
Sioux Rose
I was referring to integrity. Your recall of recent political history is much clearer than mine! Of course I tend to focus on the stellar stuff more.
Thanks Sioux for the clarification. Recent? And I thought 1984 was a real long time ago just comparing it to today. I was 3 in 1984 so I had to look up more information. Something still tells me that there's more to Walter Mondale than I found out about him. My parents would mention Raygun once in a while but only on worshipping him as if he were a "saint" when he was a slick devil though not as slick as Clinton, Dubya, and Obama. Mention Mondale to them and they always call him a "tax raising Satan". I saw the election results of 1984 on uselectionatlas.org and MO was 60% red while FL was 65% red !
Jerry, thanks for letting me know about Franken and Israel. If I see Franken playing kissyface with AIPAC like Obama did last year, then I'll have an uneasy feeling that Franken's also screwed.